Skip to main content

Creating a Common Home? Indo-Pakistan Relations and the Search for Security in South Asia

  • Chapter
The Post-Colonial States of South Asia
  • 64 Accesses

Abstract

Indo-Pakistan relations present the analyst and the policy maker with one of the most intransigent cases of mistrust, suspicion and threat to be found in the contemporary world. The early 1990s witnessed a series of diplomatic expulsions, mutual accusations of spying, the closing of consular offices, and allegations of covert support for separatist groups and militants operative in Kashmir, Sindh (especially Karachi), India’s northeast and Baluchistan. In March 1993, a series of bomb explosions in the Indian city of Bombay killed 250 people, and led to the accusation that Pakistan was behind the carnage. In early 1996, a bomb explosion in Lahore led to similar accusations by the Pakistanis against India. In mid-1999, following incursions from the Pakistani side, the two countries fought a short war in the Kargil area of Kashmir.

I would like to thank my colleagues Eric Herring and Richard Little for reading over this chapter and making various comments and suggestions. Both brought my attention to a particularly useful set of articles and books.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. BJP, Manifesto 1998: Vote For a Stable Government and an Able Prime Minister (New Delhi: 1998), 31, ‘Policies on National Defence’.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Perhaps the most revealing statement on the wider context in which the BJP-led government decided to test can be gleaned from Jaswant Singh’s book, Defending India (New Delhi: Macmillans, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  3. For a fascinating study of the problems faced by the boundary commission, see R. J. Moore, Making the New Commonwealth (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987). Moore notes that ‘the essential conditions of [Radcliffe’s] brief [from the government] which he took up on 8 July was that he must exercise independent judgment to bring down the awards by 15 August (p. 25).

    Google Scholar 

  4. The Afghan claims on Pakistan primarily involved the province of Baluchistan. As late as 1969, the Afghan government issued a postage stamp that showed the borders of Afghanistan as incorporating Baluchistan and parts of the Pakistan tribal belt. See M. Z. Ispahani, Roads and Rivals: The Politics of Access in the Borderlands of Asia (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ayesha Jalal, The State of Martial Rule: The Origins of Pakistan’s Political Economy of Defence (Cambridge University Press, 1990), 25.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sajjad Hyder, Reflections of an Ambassador (Lahore: 1988), 75.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Z. A. Khan, Pakistan’s Security (Lahore: 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Space precludes a full discussion of the immensity of this subject. See Alastair Lamb’s two books Kashmir, A Disputed Legacy 1846–1990 (Roxford: 1992), and Kashmir Birth of a Tragedy: Kashmir 1947 and my own Reclaiming the Past: The Search for Political and Cultural Unity in Jammu and Kashmir (1995) for a good overview of the controversies.

    Google Scholar 

  9. See Ayesha Jalal, Democracy and Authoritarianism in South Asia: A Comparative and Historical Perspective (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. A. Vanaik and P. Bidwai, ‘India and Pakistan,’ in R.C. Karp, ed., Security With Nuclear Weapons? Differing Perspectives on National Security, (London: 1991), 263.

    Google Scholar 

  11. P. N. Haksar, India’s Foreign Policy and its Problems (New Delhi: Patriot Publishers, 1989), 53.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  13. While I recognise the vagueness of this term, it seems to me to convey the right sense of urgency about defence expenditure, and weapon system procurements currently witnessed in Indo-Pakistan relations. I am convinced that the current position between India and Pakistan fits both Martin Wight’s definition of an arms race (in Power Politics, 239), and Colin Gray’s discussion of an arms race in ‘The Arms Race Phenomenon’, World Politics 24, 1974, 41. Note Gray’s fourth point that ‘there must be a rapid increase in quantity and/or improvements in quality of weapons,’ Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  14. IISS, The Military Balance 1989–90, (London: OUP, 1990). Put another way, however, India still spends less on defence as a percentage of her GNP (about 4 percent) compared to Pakistan’s estimated 7 percent. There are difficulties in calculating or estimating China’s defence expenditure, and quotes vary from 4–8 percent: see Brassey’s Asian Security (London: 1989), 43.

    Google Scholar 

  15. See my mimeo ‘Containing Shiva? India and the Politics of Nuclear Non-proliferation’, in IISS, The Military Balance 1998/9 (London: OUP, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  16. S. C. Gangal, India and the Commonwealth (Agra, India: Shiv Lal Agarwal, 1970), 63.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2001 Amita Shastri and A. Jeyaratnam Wilson

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hewitt, V. (2001). Creating a Common Home? Indo-Pakistan Relations and the Search for Security in South Asia. In: Shastri, A., Wilson, A.J. (eds) The Post-Colonial States of South Asia. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-11508-9_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics