Abstract
Toxoplasma gondii has emerged as an important etiology in waterborne protozoa outbreaks, this organism has an evolutionary form, known as oocysts, capable of maintaining viability for a long time in the environment and water. The diagnosis of this protozoan in water samples is difficult, mainly because of variability in the water physical parameters which makes the development of a standard technique difficult. Some advances in methodologies have been described for the diagnosis of T. gondii oocysts in water; nevertheless, there are yet no official and/or commercial kits for this diagnostic. Here we describe a method to be applied in water matrices to concentrate, purify, and detect T. gondii oocysts, and this protocol aims to be simple to establish in common laboratories with basic molecular biology equipment (DNA extraction and PCR).
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Key words
1 Introduction
Toxoplasma gondii is a zoonotic parasitic protozoan, capable of infecting humans and other homeothermic animals. Several forms of transmission occur in the toxoplasmosis cycle, among them, waterborne transmission emerges as an important transmission route capable of causing large-scale outbreaks [1, 2].
Felids, especially domestic cats, are the T. gondii definitive hosts, so in them parasite sexual development occurs, this infection culminates in oocyst production, which are shed through feces into the environment. Under temperature and humidity suitable conditions, oocysts become infectious and can be carried to watersheds [3]. T. gondii oocysts are highly resistant to environmental conditions and can remain viable for months to years in the environment; this evolutionary form is also resistant to the main disinfectants widely used, including those based on chlorine widely used in water treatment [4, 5].
Among waterborne diseases, several etiologies are known [6]. Among protozoa, Cryptosporidium , Giardia , and T. gondii are the main etiologies in protozoa waterborne outbreaks [7, 8]. Toxoplasmosis outbreaks have historically been described as restricted and commonly related to community food transmission mainly through the ingestion of tissue cysts ; however, since 2000, waterborne transmission has been described more frequently [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9].
The diagnostic of T. gondii in water matrices, mainly in raw and treated water, is essential for the characterization of occurrence and distribution of this protozoa in different locations, from this knowledge parameters based in risk assessment can be estimated to provide a better control of toxoplasmosis dissemination [10]. In epidemic situations, specifically when a water source is considered suspected in an outbreak, a positive outcome in a water test can confirm the evaluated source as the outbreak cause. Nevertheless, T. gondii oocyst detection in water samples is complex as the known methods lack sensitivity and specificity [10, 11].
The main factor that negatively impact the diagnostic techniques applied to water testing is the diversity of the physical-chemical characteristics of water in the environment, especially turbidity; this provide a great variation in the performance of the methods used for diagnosis [12, 13].
Different protocols for T. gondii diagnostic in water samples are known, from simple techniques whose are mainly applied to direct diagnostic in fecal samples from definitive hosts to techniques more adapted to inherent necessities of methods applied to environmental investigations [14]. Between the most modern techniques stand out the immunomagnetic separation efficiency, the purification of concentrated samples, and the diagnostic/quantification ability of qPCR; however, there is still no commercial availability of kits for wide use in routine diagnostic [15, 16, 27]. Specifically with respect to T. gondii, morphological identification methods are not able to distinguish T. gondii oocysts from at least four other coccid species (Hammondia hammondi, H. heydorni, Neospora caninum, and Besnoitia); therefore, the simple direct transposition of methods routinely used in hosts may not be suitable for environmental matrices [3, 17].
Considering the absence of commercial kits that include these new diagnostic advances, the methods used as a routine to investigate the presence of T. gondii oocysts in water samples still consist of sample concentration by filtration, elution with surfactant solution (Tween® 80 0.1%), later centrifugal concentration of the eluted material, with or without a fluctuation purification step in a dense solution (sucrose, cesium chloride) [18,19,20]. For visualization and identification of parasitic forms by microscopy, UV light microscopy is superior when compared with brightfield microscopy since coccid oocysts present a characteristic autofluorescence when exposed to this wavelength [20, 21].
This technique, based on concentration by filtration, surfactant elution and microscopic visualization, was adapted from methodologies applied to diagnosis and monitoring of Cryptosporidium and Giardia . The different methodologies applied to T. gondii oocyst diagnosis and monitoring in water samples lacks efficiency, especially when compared to the reported efficiencies of methods applied to other protozoa such as Cryptosporidium and Giardia , for these ones worldwide standardized and validated methods are available [22]. Filter cartridges eluted by agitation indicated for Cryptosporidium and Giardia , when applied for concentration of T. gondii oocysts in high-turbidity samples, present a recovery efficiency 10 times lower than the recommended [10].
Since the popularization of molecular techniques is applied to diagnosis , detection by PCR started to be commonly applied as it has a greater sensitivity and specificity and can differentiate T. gondii from other coccids. However, the relative resilience of oocysts to methods generally applied to cell disruption, in addition to the known presence of PCR inhibitors in environmental and fecal samples, represents a challenge for obtaining pure DNA [23, 24]. In order to overcome the occurrence of inhibition on genetic material amplifications, studies have demonstrated a greater robustness of the loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) technique, which is not inhibited by the main inhibitors present in the environment; however, it is not yet a widely known and used technique like PCR [25, 26].
Therefore, to avoid occurrence of false negatives due to analytical inadequacy, an extensive method validation must be performed, as well as an internal amplification control (IAC) must be employed in the PCR . Methods used to monitor the presence of pathogens in water and food for human consumption must be thoroughly tested, and the extent of the influence of pre-analytical factors must be known since these data provide greater reliability of the obtained results [22].
Molecular diagnostic techniques such as conventional PCR and LAMP do not allow oocyst quantification within a sample, so techniques that allow quantification such as qPCR must be validated for a better understanding of the occurrence and contamination dimension [10, 27,28,29].
2 Materials
-
1.
Distilled water
-
2.
Tween 80 (Polysorbate 80) 0.1% (V/V).
-
3.
Vacuum pump.
-
4.
Silicone tubes.
-
5.
Kitassate 4 L.
-
6.
Filtration system for 47 mm diameter membrane.
-
7.
47 mm Mixed cellulose esters (MCE) membranes, maximum porosity of 5 μm.
-
8.
Disposable petri dishes.
-
9.
Calibrated loop.
-
10.
Disposable Pasteur pipettes.
-
11.
Conical tubes for centrifugation (50 mL).
-
12.
Centrifuge with rotor for conical tubes.
-
13.
Crystal sugar.
-
14.
Densimeter.
-
15.
Phenol.
-
16.
Aqueous sucrose solution (sp.g. 1208 g/L).
-
17.
Microtubes.
-
18.
Brightfield microscope.
Optional: Phase-contrast, differential interference contrast (DIC), UV light microscope (330–380 nm excitation and 400 nm barrier).
-
19.
DNA Extraction kit (including all materials required from the manufacturer).
-
20.
General PCR reagents and equipment.
-
21.
General DNA electrophoresis reagents and equipment.
3 Methods
3.1 Indication
This protocol is indicated for the concentration, purification , and detection of T. gondii oocysts in raw, treated, spring, and ground water samples.
3.2 Sampling
When the water is piped, sampling can occur directly from the tap. If it is not, sampling can occur directly in the watershed or fountain, in this case the sampler must be cautious to not revolve the soil/sediment. The minimum water volume to be processed by this technique is described below:
-
1.
Raw water: at least 3 L.
-
2.
Treated water: 100 L.
-
3.
Spring and groundwater: 100 L.
3.3 Concentration
A high oocyst dilution is expected in water matrices, this can drive to a low oocyst concentration on collected sample, so a concentration step aims to concentrate the oocysts to a low volume for detection ; as there is not a concentration technique able to concentrate only T. gondii oocysts , it is important to take into account that other samples constituents (e.g., organic/inorganic matter, soil, etc.) will be also concentrated (see Note 1).
3.4 Filtration
-
1.
Using the silicone tubes, plug the vacuum pump to the kitassate.
-
2.
Connect the filter system to the kitassate, ensure that the system is well placed to not lose vacuum pressure during filtration.
-
3.
Place the membrane in the designed space of the filter system and lock with the filter system clamp.
-
4.
Turn on the vacuum pump.
-
5.
Rinse the whole filter system with Tween® 80 (0.1%).
-
6.
Add sample in the filter system cup and continue adding the sample during the filtration.
-
(a)
Whenever the filtration speed dramatically decreases, change the membrane, as the filter membrane pores have saturated (the frequency of the membrane change will depend on the turbidity of the water sample).
-
(b)
If the membrane has saturated and some sample is still in the filtration cup, use a disposable pipette to remove the sample until the membrane appears dry.
-
(c)
Be careful with the vacuum pump temperature ; long period filtration can cause a pump overheat.
-
(d)
Be careful with the filtrate volume and kitassate capacity; whenever the kitassate reaches the capacity, remove the vacuum pressure, remove the filtration system and drain out the kitassate.
-
(a)
-
7.
Place used membranes, with the concentrated matter, in a disposable petri dish and add Tween 80 0.1% until it is covered.
-
(a)
If membrane filtration and membrane elution are not performed in the same place, the membranes can be packaged in a plastic bag with Tween 80 0.1% and kept under refrigeration (4 °C).
3.5 Membrane Elution and Centrifuge Concentration
-
1.
With the loop part of a calibrated loop, perform a smooth membrane scraping in different directions during 20 min in each membrane.
-
(a)
If membranes are placed in a plastic bag, carefully remove the membrane and place them in a disposable petri dish with Tween 80 0.1% for scraping, and save the liquid.
-
(a)
-
2.
After scrapping, transfer the Tween 80 0.1% solution from the petri dish to a centrifuge conical tube.
-
(a)
If membranes are placed in a plastic bag with Tween 80 0.1%, also transfer the plastic bag liquid to the centrifuge conical tube.
-
(a)
-
3.
Centrifuge the tubes (2100 × g/10 min).
-
4.
Carefully remove the supernatant using a disposable Pasteur pipette. Leave a minimum quantity of supernatant for pellet resuspension. Resuspend the pellet using the Pasteur pipette.
-
(a)
If more than one tube is necessary to fit all the liquid generated in the elution, transfer all the resuspended pellets from the same sample to a single conical tube.
-
(a)
-
5.
Centrifuge the tubes (2100 × g/10 min).
-
6.
Carefully remove the supernatant using a disposable Pasteur pipette. Leave a minimum quantity of supernatant for pellet resuspension.
-
7.
When the final sediment is greater than 500 μL, purification must be performed before detection .
3.6 Purification
During the membrane elution and centrifuge–concentration step, various organisms and environmental compounds were concentrated in addition to the oocysts , so when a high pellet volume is obtained in concentration, the purification step is necessary to remove as many components as possible that could interfere with the detection phase.
-
1.
Resuspend the concentrated sample (0.5–5 mL) in 40 mL of sucrose solution (g.sp. = 1.208 g/mL) in a 50-mL conical tube.
-
(a)
T. gondii oocyst density is 1.11 ~ 1.14 g/mL.
-
(a)
-
2.
Centrifuge at 1250 × g for 10 min.
-
3.
Collect 5 mL of the superficial meniscus using a Pasteur pipette, and transfer it to a new 50-mL conical centrifuge tube.
-
4.
Add 40 mL of distilled water and mix vigorously.
-
5.
Centrifuge at 2100 × g for 10 min.
-
6.
Carefully discard the supernatant using a Pasteur pipette and resuspend the formed sediment with 0.5–1.5 mL of distilled water (uses the sufficient volume necessary to resuspend the sediment and form a homogeneous appearance mixture).
-
7.
Place the purified material in a sterile microtube and store under refrigeration (4 °C) until detection .
-
(a)
Detection steps must be performed within 48 h.
-
(a)
3.7 Detection
In the detection step, there is a direct parasite diagnostic, through evaluation of microscopic morphological structure, or through PCR DNA amplification.
3.7.1 Microscopic Detection (See Note 2)
-
1.
Wet-mount 20 μL of the concentrate/purified on slide and coverslip.
-
2.
Screen the slide in brightfield microscopy, phase contrast or UV light microscopy with 330–380 nm excitation and 400 nm barrier in the 40× objective.
-
3.
When positive, the sample will present oocysts of approximately 12 μm, when not sporulated, characterized by a spherical shape with a modulated interior, and when sporulated, a spherical to elliptical shape containing two sporocysts with four sporozoites inside (see Note 3).
3.7.2 PCR Detection
3.7.2.1 DNA Extraction
To obtain more accurate results in the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) , it is suggested to extract DNA by means of commercial kits. The most efficient DNA extraction and purification are those indicated for extracting nucleic acids from faces and environmental samples (e.g., soil, water, soil, and plants; water, for drinking water, raw water).
A method validation should be carried out to assure that the kit protocol is able to extract DNA from T. gondii oocysts .
3.7.2.2 PCR Targeting the rep529
A PCR targeting the non-codified 529 bp repeated sequence from T. gondii genome based on primers tox4 and tox5 described by Homan et al. (2000) is indicated.
-
1.
Assembly reaction components (Table 1) in an identified PCR microtube (200 μL) or in each PCR microplate well.
-
2.
Allocate microtubes in thermocycler. Check reagents’ manufacturer’s instructions regarding PCR cycle. A cycle example is described in Table 2.
After PCR amplification, run an electrophoresis for DNA detection as follows:
-
1.
Prepare 1.5% (w/v) agarose gel with TBE or TAE buffers.
-
2.
Run the electrophoresis with DNA dye and loading buffer of preference following the manufacturer’s instructions.
-
3.
Expose the gel to indicated wavelength of the DNA dye used, a sample is considered positive when a DNA band of 529 bp is observed (see Note 3).
4 Notes
-
1.
High turbidity levels negatively affect technique efficiency.
-
2.
T. gondii oocysts are microscopically indistinguishable from those of Neospora and Hammondia genus. Oocysts of coccids when exposed to UV light emit fluorescence in blue color, facilitating their visualization in complex samples. Due to the difficulty of microscopy detection mainly caused by low final volume of the sample analyzed, presence of confounding structures and the non-differentiation between Neospora and Hammondia and T. gondii oocysts , concomitant use of molecular methods is recommended.
-
3.
In outbreak situations, laboratory tests results should be evaluated together with epidemiological analysis, as a negative test does not exclude the possibility of T. gondii oocysts presence, so T. gondii diagnostic techniques applied to environmental samples can present low sensitivity among other causes due to the difficulty in collecting and/or concentrating large volumes. Time elapsed between the first clinical signs, case notification, and sample collection should always be accounted in outbreak situations.
References
Pinto-Ferreira F, Caldart ET, Pasquali AKS, Mitsuka-Breganó R, Freire RL, Navarro IT (2019) Patterns of transmission and sources of infection in outbreaks of human toxoplasmosis. Emerg Infect Dis 25:2177–2182. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2512.181565
Minuzzi CE, D’ambroso Fernandes F, Portella LP, Bräunig P, Sturza DAF, Giacomini L et al (2020) Contaminated water confirmed as source of infection by bioassay in an outbreak of toxoplasmosis in South Brazil. Transbound Emerg Dis 68(2):767–772. https://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.13741
Jones JL, Dubey JP (2010) Waterborne toxoplasmosis--recent developments. Exp Parasitol 124:10–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exppara.2009.03.013
VanWormer E, Fritz H, Shapiro K, Mazet JAK, Conrad PA (2013) Molecules to modeling: toxoplasma gondii oocysts at the human-animal-environment interface. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis 36:217–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cimid.2012.10.006
Dubey JP (2004) Toxoplasmosis - a waterborne zoonosis. Vet Parasitol 126:57–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2004.09.005
Percival S, Chalmers R, Embrey M, Hunter P, Sellwood J, Wyn-Jones P (2004) Microbiology of waterborne diseases, 1st edn. Academic Press, Boston
Karanis P, Kourenti C, Smith H, Karanis P, Smith H, Kourenti C et al (2007) Waterborne transmission of protozoan parasites: a worldwide review of outbreaks and lessons learnt. J Water Health 5:1–38. https://doi.org/10.2166/wh.2006.002
Efstratiou A, Ongerth JE, Karanis P (2017) Waterborne transmission of protozoan parasites: review of worldwide outbreaks - an update 2011–2016. Water Res 114:14–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.01.036
Dias RAF, Freire RL (2005) Surtos de toxoplasmose em seres humanos e animais. Semin Ciências Agrárias 26:239–248
Galvani AT, Christ APG, Padula JA, Barbosa MRF, de Araújo RS, Sato MIZ et al (2019) Real-time PCR detection of toxoplasma gondii in surface water samples in São Paulo, Brazil. Parasitol Res 118:631–640. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-018-6185-z
Yan C, Liang LJ, Zheng KY, Zhu XQ (2016) Impact of environmental factors on the emergence, transmission and distribution of toxoplasma gondii. Parasit Vectors 9:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-016-1432-6
Franco RMB, Branco N, Leal DAG (2012) Parasitologia ambiental: Métodos de concentração e detecção de Cryptosporidium spp. e Giardia spp. em amostras de água. Rev Patol Trop 41:119–135. https://doi.org/10.5216/rpt.v41i2.19320
Franco RMB, Hachich EM, Naveira RML, de Carvalho Silva E, Campos MMDC, Cantusio Neto R et al (2012) Avaliação da performance de metodologias de detecção de Cryptosporidium spp. e Giardia spp. em água destinada ao consumo humano, para o atendimento às demandas da Vigilância em Saúde Ambiental no Brasil. Epidemiol e Serviços Saúde 21:233–242. https://doi.org/10.5123/S1679-49742012000200006
Dumètre A, Dardé ML (2003) How to detect toxoplasma gondii oocysts in environmental samples? FEMS Microbiol Rev 27:651–661. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-6445(03)00071-8
Harito JB, Campbell AT, Tysnes KR, Robertson LJ (2017) Use of lectin-magnetic separation (LMS) for detecting Toxoplasma gondii oocysts in environmental water samples. Water Res 127:68–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.10.012
Dumètre A, Dardé ML (2005) Immunomagnetic separation of toxoplasma gondii oocysts using a monoclonal antibody directed against the oocyst wall. J Microbiol Methods 61(2):209–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2004.11.024
Shapiro K, Mazet JAK, Schriewer A, Wuertz S, Fritz H, Miller WA et al (2010) Detection of toxoplasma gondii oocysts and surrogate microspheres in water using ultrafiltration and capsule filtration. Water Res 44:893–903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2009.09.061
Pinto-Ferreira F, Mitsuka-Breganó R, Monica TC, Martins FDC, de Matos RLN, Mareze M et al (2019) Investigation and environmental analysis of samples from outbreak of toxoplasmosis at research institution in Londrina, Paraná, Brazil, 2016. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet 28:518–521. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1984-29612019044
Dumètre A, Dardé M-L (2004) Purification of toxoplasma gondii oocysts by cesium chloride gradient. J Microbiol Methods 56:427–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2003.11.020
Pineda CO, Leal DAG, da Silva Fiuza VR, Jose J, Borelli G, Durigan M et al (2020) Toxoplasmagondii oocysts, Giardia cysts and Cryptosporidium oocysts in outdoor swimming pools in Brazil. Zoonoses Public Health 67(7):785–795. https://doi.org/10.1111/zph.12757
Lindquist HDA, Bennett JW, Hester JD, Ware MW, Dubey JP, Everson WV (2003) Autofluorescence of toxoplasma gondii and related coccidian oocysts. J Parasitol 89:865–867. https://doi.org/10.1645/GE-3147RN
USEPA (2012) US EPA method 1623.1 EPA 816-R-12-001
Sidstedt M, Rådström P, Hedman J (2020) PCR inhibition in qPCR, dPCR and MPS—mechanisms and solutions. Anal Bioanal Chem 412:2009–2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-020-02490-2
Herrmann DC, Maksimov A, Pantchev N, Vrhovec MG, Conraths FJ, Schares G (2011) Comparison of different commercial DNA extraction kits to detect toxoplasma gondii oocysts in cat faeces. Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr 124:497–502. https://doi.org/10.2396/0005-4366-124-449
Lalle M, Possenti A, Dubey JP, Pozio E (2018) Loop-mediated isothermal amplification-lateral-flow dipstick (LAMP-LFD) to detect toxoplasma gondii oocyst in ready-to-eat salad. Food Microbiol 70:137–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2017.10.001
Lin Z, Zhang Y, Zhang H, Zhou Y, Cao J, Zhou J (2012) Comparison of loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) and real-time PCR method targeting a 529-bp repeat element for diagnosis of toxoplasmosis. Vet Parasitol 185:296–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.10.016
Harito JB, Campbell AT, Tysnes KR, Dubey JP, Robertson LJ (2017) Lectin-magnetic separation (LMS) for isolation of Toxoplasma gondii oocysts from concentrated water samples prior to detection by microscopy or qPCR. Water Res 114:228–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.02.044
Varlet-Marie E, Sterkers Y, Perrotte M, Bastien P, Working group of the French National Reference Centre for Toxoplasmosis “Molecular Biology” (2018) A new LAMP-based assay for the molecular diagnosis of toxoplasmosis: comparison with a proficient PCR assay. Int J Parasitol 48:457–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2017.11.005
Gallas-Lindemann C, Sotiriadou I, Mahmoodi MR, Karanis P (2013) Detection of Toxoplasma gondii oocysts in different water resources by Loop Mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP). Acta Trop 125:231–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2012.10.007
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Martins, F.D.C., Ladeia, W.A., Pinto-Ferreira, F., Navarro, I.T., Freire, R.L. (2021). Protocol for the Detection of Toxoplasma gondii Oocysts in Water Samples. In: Magnani, M. (eds) Detection and Enumeration of Bacteria, Yeast, Viruses, and Protozoan in Foods and Freshwater. Methods and Protocols in Food Science . Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-1932-2_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-1932-2_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-0716-1931-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-0716-1932-2
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols