Drama has been a key mode of learning and meaning making throughout recorded history; however, drama's role in teacher education is peripheral at best. Both teacher educators and pre-service teachers, because they often lack drama experience themselves, become fearful of extending themselves through such activities as creative dramatics or process drama in their classrooms. Yet creative drama is an ideal medium for developing literacy, particularly within a multi literacies paradigm. With simple, structured and progressive creative drama techniques, teacher educators can encourage pre-service teachers to become aware of the aesthetic and multi literacy benefits of drama use in their classrooms. A sample unit designed for the teacher education classroom is included.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
References
Bang, M. (1999). When Sophie gets angry—really, really angry…. New York: Scholastic Inc
Bany-Winters, L. (1997). On stage: Theater games and activities for kids. Chicago: Chicago Review Press
Barone, T. (2001). Touching eternity: The enduring outcomes of teaching. New York: Teachers College Press
Bentley, E. (1964). The life of drama. New York: Applause Theater Books
Berghoff, B. (1998). Inquiry about learning and learners. The Reading Teacher, 51(6), 520–523
Bolton, G. (1996). Afterward: Drama as research. In P. Taylor (Ed.) Researching drama and arts education: Paradigms & possibilities (pp. 187–194). Washington, DC: Falmer Press
Bolton, G. (2007). A history of drama education: A search for substance. In L. Bresler (Ed.), International handbook of research in arts education (pp. 45–61). Dordrecht, The Netherlands:Springer
Booth, D. (2003). Towards an understanding of theater in education. In K. Gallegher & D. Booth (Eds.), How theater educates convergences & counterpoints (pp. 14–22). Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press
Cecil, N. L., & Lauritzen, P. (1994). Literacy and the arts for the integrated classroom: Alternative ways of knowing. White Plains, NY: Longman
Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. New York: Capricorn Books
Eisner, E. (1988). The primacy of experience and the politics of method. Educational Researcher, 17(5), 15–20
Eisner, E. (2005). The role of intelligence in the creation of art in D. A. Breault & R. Breault (Eds.) Experiencing Dewey: Insights for today's classroom (pp. 106–108). Indianapolis, IN:Kappa Delta Pi
Gallego, M., & Hollingsworth, S. (2000). Introduction: The idea of multiple literacies. In M.Gallego & S. Hollingsworth (Eds.), What counts as literacy: Challenging the school standard (pp. 1–23). New York: Teachers College Press
Gibbs, J. (2001). Tribes: A new way of learning and being together. Windsor, CA: Center Source Systems
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday
Greene, M. (1995). Releasing the imagination: Essays on education, the arts, and social change.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
Hull, G. & Nelson, M. (2005). Locating the semiotic power of multimodality. Written Communication, 22(2), 224–261
Kress, G. (1997). Before writing: Rethinking the paths to literacy. New York: Routledge
Latta, M. (2001). The possibilities of play in the classroom. New York: Peter Lang
McCaslin, N. (2005). Seeking the aesthetic in creative drama and theatre for young audiences.Journal of Aesthetic Education, 39(4), 12–19
Mavers, D. (2007). Semiotic resourcefulness: A young child's email exchange as design. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 7(2), 155–176
Moll, L., & Greenberg, J. (1990). Creating zones of possibilities: Combining social contexts for instruction. In L. Moll (Ed.), Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology (pp. 319–348). Melbourne, Australia: Cambridge University Press
Norris, J., McGammon, L., & Miller, C. (2000). Learning to teach drama: A narrative approach.Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann
Saldaña, J. (1995). Drama of color: Improvisation with multiethnic folklore. Portsmouth, NH:Heinemann
Sendak, M. (1963). Where the wild things are. New York: Harper Collins
Short, K. G., & Kauffman, G. (2000). Exploring sign systems within an inquiry system. In M.A.Gallego & S. Hollingsworth (Eds.), What counts as literacy: Challenging the school standard (pp. 42–61). New York: Teachers College Press
Siegel, M. (2006). Rereading the signs: Multimodal transformations in the field of literacy education. Language Arts, 84(1), 65–77
Spolin, V. (1986). Theater games of the classroom: A teacher's handbook. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press
Viorst, J. (1987). Alexander and the terrible, horrible, no good, very bad day (2nd ed.). New York: Alladdin Paperbacks
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Wagner, B. J. (1999/1976). Dorothy Heathcote: Drama as a learning medium (Rev. Ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heineman
Wertsch, J. (1990). The voice of rationality in a sociocultural approach to mind. In L. Moll (Ed.),Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology (pp. 111–126). Melbourne, Australia: Cambridge University Press
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kerry-Moran, K.J., Meyer, J.M. (2009). Lighting the Fires Within:. In: Narey, M. (eds) Making Meaning. Educating the Young Child, vol 2. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-87539-2_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-87539-2_12
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-87537-8
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-87539-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)