Concluding Remarks
When poverty is viewed as a matter of degree in contrast to the conventional poor/non-poor dichotomy, that is, as a fuzzy state, two additional aspects are introduced into the analysis.
-
(i)
The choice of membership functions i.e. quantitative specification of individuals’ or households’ degrees of poverty and deprivation.
-
(ii)
And the choice of rules for the manipulation of the resulting fuzzy sets, rules defining their complements, intersections, union and aggregation. Specifically, for longitudinal analysis of poverty using the fuzzy set approach, we need joint membership functions covering more than one time period, which have to be constructed on the basis of the series of cross-sectional membership functions over those time periods.
This Chapter has discussed approaches and procedures for constructing fuzzy measures of income poverty and of combining them with similarly constructed measures of non-monetary deprivation using the fuzzy set approach. In fact, the procedures for combining fuzzy measures in multiple dimensions at a given time are identical, in formal terms, to the procedures for combining fuzzy cross-sectional measures over multiple time periods. We have proposed a general rule for the construction of fuzzy set intersections, that is, for the construction of a longitudinal poverty measure from a sequence of cross-sectional measures under fuzzy conceptualization. This general rule is meant to be applicable to any sequence of “poor” and “non-poor” sets, and it satisfies all the marginal constraints. On the basis of the results obtained, various fuzzy poverty measures over time can be constructed as consistent generalizations of the corresponding conventional (dichotomous) measures.
Numerical results of these procedures applied to measures of multidimensional poverty and deprivation, and to combinations of such measures have been presented elsewhere.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
References
Betti G, Cheli B, Cambini R (2004) A statistical model for the dynamics between two fuzzy states: theory and an application to poverty analysis. Metron 62:391–411.
Betti G, Cheli B, Lemmi A, Verma V (2005a) On the construction of fuzzy measures for the analysis of poverty and social exclusion. Presented at the International Conference in Memory of two Eminent Social Scientists: C. Gini and M.O. Lorenz, Siena, Italy, May 2005
Betti G, Cheli B, Lemmi A, Verma V (2005b) On longitudinal analysis of poverty conceptualised as a fuzzy state. Presented at the First Meeting of the Society for the Study of Economic Inequality (ECINEQ), Palma de Mallorca, Spain, July 2005
Betti G, Verma V (1999) Measuring the degree of poverty in a dynamic and comparative context: a multi-dimensional approach using fuzzy set theory. Proceedings ICCS-VI, Vol. 11, pp. 289–301, Lahore, Pakistan
Betti G, Verma V (2002) Non-monetary or Lifestyle Deprivation. In: Eurostat, European Social Statistics: Income, Poverty and Social Exclusion: 2nd Report, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, pp 76–92.
Betti G, Verma V (2004) A methodology for the study of multi-dimensional and longitudinal aspects of poverty and deprivation. Universitá di Siena, Dipartimento di Metodi Quantitativi, Working Paper 49
Cerioli A, Zani S (1990) A Fuzzy Approach to the Measurement of Poverty. In: Dagum C, Zenga M (eds) Income and Wealth Distribution, Inequality and Poverty, Studies in Contemporary Economics, Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp 272–284.
Cheli B (1995) Totally Fuzzy and Relative Measures in Dynamics Context. Metron 53:183–205.
Cheli B, Betti G (1999) Fuzzy Analysis of Poverty Dynamics on an Italian Pseudo Panel, 1985–1994. Metron 57:83–103.
Cheli B, Lemmi A (1995) A “Totally” Fuzzy and Relative Approach to the Multi-dimensional Analysis of Poverty. Economic Notes 24:115–134.
Chiappero-Martinetti E (2000) A multidimensional assessment of well-being based on Sen’s functioning approach. Rivista Internazionale di Scienze Sociali 108:207–239.
Clark D, Qizilbash M (2002) Core poverty and extreme vulnerability in South Africa. The Economics Research Centre, School of Economic and Social Studies, University of East Anglia, Discussion Paper 2002/3
Eurostat (2002) European Social Statistics: Income, Poverty and Social Exclusion: 2nd Report. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities
Hagenaars AJM (1986) The Perception of Poverty. North Holland, Amsterdam
Klir G J, Yuan B (1995) Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Logic. Prentice Hall, New Jersey
Lelli S (2001) Factor Analysis vs. Fuzzy Sets Theory: Assessing the Influence of Different Techniques on Sen’s Functioning Approach. Discussion Paper Series DPS 01.21, November 2001, Center for Economic Studies, Catholic University of Louvain
Maasoumi E, Nickelsburg G (1988) Multivariate measures of well-being and ananalysis of inequality in the Michigan data. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 6:326–334.
Nolan B, Whelan CT (1996) Resources, deprivation and poverty. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Ram R (1982) Composite indices of physical quality of life, basic needs fulfillment and income. A principal component representation. Journal of Development Economics 11:227–248.
Verma V, Betti G (2002) Longitudinal measures of income poverty and life-style deprivation. Universith degli Studi di Padova, Dipartimento di Scienze di Statistiche, Working Paper 50
Whelan CT, Layte R, Maitre B, Nolan B (2001) Income, deprivation and economic strain: an analysis of the European Community Household Panel. European Sociological Review 17:357–372.
Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Information and Control 8:338–353.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Betti, G., Cheli, B., Lemmi, A., Verma, V. (2006). Multidimensional and Longitudinal Poverty: an Integrated Fuzzy Approach. In: Lemmi, A., Betti, G. (eds) Fuzzy Set Approach to Multidimensional Poverty Measurement. Economic Studies in Inequality, Social Exclusion and Well-Being, vol 3. Springer, Boston, MA . https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-34251-1_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-34251-1_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-34249-8
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-34251-1
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)