Skip to main content

Responses of Small Mammals to Habitat Edges

  • Chapter
Landscape Ecology of Small Mammals

Abstract

Ecologists understand the world as a seamless fabric in space and time and are fond of saying that everything is connected to everything else. They also know, however, that said fabric is not homogeneous nor necessarily changing only gradually. Discontinuities are rampant, and so we have “things” defined by those discontinuities or boundaries. Habitat edges are one such type of discontinuity. These edges are critical features in the life of organisms and are essential components to our understanding of how they respond to habitat heterogeneity (Lidicker and Koenig 1996). Although edges have always been important in the functioning of the biosphere, their prevalence is accelerating in a world increasingly dominated by anthropogenic influences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Andreassen, H.P., S. Halle, and R.A. Ims. I 996a. Optimal width of movement corridors for root voles: Not too narrow and not too wide. Journal of Applied Ecology 33: 63–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andreassen, H.P., R.A. Ims, and O.K. Steinset. 1996b. Discontinuous habitat corridors: effects on male root vole movements. Journal of Applied Ecology 33: 555–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andreassen, H.P., K. Hertzberg, and R.A. Ims. 1998. Space use responses to habitat fragmentation and connectivity in the root vole Microtus oeconomus. Ecology 79: 1223–1235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, K.W. 1995. Space use responses of root voles (Microtus oeconomus) to a habitat fragmentation gradient. M.S. Thesis, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, M.A., K. Gregario, C.J. Brame, S.F. Matter, and J.L. Dooley, Jr. 1996. Use of space and habitats by meadow voles at the home range, patch and landscape scales. Oecologia 105: 107–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, R.J. and G.W. Barrett, 1997. Effects of habitat fragmentation on the meadow vole (Microtus pennsylvanicus) population dynamics in experiment landscape patches. Landscape Ecology 12: 63–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duelli, P., M. Studer, I. Marchand, and S. Jakob. 1990. Population movements of arthropods between natural and cultivated areas. Biological Conservation 54: 193207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman, R.T.T., and P.N. Moore. 1992. Theoretical foundations for understanding boundaries in landscape mosaics. Pages 236–258 in A.J. Hansen and F. di Castri, editors. Landscape boundaries, consequences for biotic diversity and ecological flows. Ecological Studies Vol. 92, Springer-Verlag, New York, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, A.J., and F. di Castri (editors). 1992. Landscape boundaries, consequences for biotic diversity and ecological flows. Ecological Studies Vol. 92, Springer-Verlag, New York, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, A.J., P.G. Risser, and F. di Castri. 1992. Epilogue: biodiversity and ecological flows across ecotones. Pages 423–438 in A.J. Hansen and F. di Castri, editors. Landscape boundaries, consequences for biotic diversity and ecological flows. Ecological Studies Vol. 92, Springer-Verlag, New York, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heske, E.J. 1995. Mammalian abundances on forest-farm edges versus forest interiors in southern Illinois: is there an edge effect? Journal of Mammalogy 76: 562–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, C.A., J. Pastor, and G. Pinay. 1992. Quantitative methods for studying landscape boundaries. Pages 107–125 in A.J. Hansen and F. di Castri, editors. Landscape boundaries, consequences for biotic diversity and ecological flows. Ecological Studies Vol. 92, Springer-Verlag, New York, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenward, R. 1987. Wildlife radio tagging: equipment, field technique and data analysis. Academic Press, London, United Kingdom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold, A. 1933. Game management. Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lidicker, W.Z., Jr. 1976. Experimental manipulation of the timing of reproduction in the California vole. Researches on Population Ecology 18: 14–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lidicker, W.Z., Jr. 1979. Analysis of two freely-growing enclosed populations of the California vole. Journal of Mammalogy 60: 447–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lidicker, W.Z., Jr. 1988. Solving the enigma of microtine “cycles.” Journal of Mammalogy 69: 225–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lidicker, W.Z., Jr. 1995a. The landscape concept: something old, something new. Pages 3–19 in W.Z. Lidicker, Jr., editor. Landscape approaches in mammalian ecology and conservation. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lidicker, W.Z., Jr. (editor). 1995b. Landscape approaches in mammalian ecology and conservation. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lidicker, W.Z., Jr., and W. D. Koenig. 1996. Responses of terrestrial vertebrates to habitat edges and corridors. Pages 85–109 in D.R. McCullough, editor. Metapopulations and wildlife conservation. Island Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lidicker, W.Z., Jr., J.O. Wolff, L.N. Lidicker, and M.H. Smith. 1992. Utilization of a habitat mosaic by cotton rats during a population decline. Landscape Ecology 6: 259–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, L.S. 1996. Fragmentation of a natural area: dynamics of isolation for small mammals on forest remnants. Pages 199–218 in R.G. Wright, editor. National parks and protected areas: their role in environmental protection. Blackwell Science Publications, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murcia, C. 1995. Edge effects in fragmented forests: implications for conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 10: 58–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Odum, E.P. 1971. Fundamentals of ecology. W.B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, J.A. 1996. Gray-tailed vole population responses to inbreeding and environ mental stress. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T.B., R.K. Wayne, D.J. Girman, and M.W. Bruford. 1997. A role for ecotones in generating rainforest biodiversity. Science 276: 1855–1857.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stamps, J.A., M. Buechner, and V.V. Krishnan. 1987. The effects of habitat geometry on territorial defense costs: intruder pressure in bounded habitats. American Zoologist 27: 307–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiens, J.A. 1992. Ecological flows across landscape boundaries: a conceptual view. Pages 217–235 in A. J. Hansen and F. di Castri, editors. Landscape boundaries, consequences for biotic diversity and ecological flows. Ecological Studies Vol. 92, Springer-Verlag, New York, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiens, J.A., C.S. Crawford, and J.R. Gosz. 1985. Boundary dynamics: a conceptual framework for studying landscape ecosystems. Oikos 45: 421–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, J.O., and E.M. Schauber. 1996. Space use and juvenile recruitment in gray-tailed voles in response to intruder pressure and food abundance. Acta Theriologica 41: 3543.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, J.O., E.M. Schauber, and W.D. Edge. 1996. Can dispersal barriers really be used to depict emigrating small mammals? Canadian Journal of Zoology 74: 1826–1830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, J.O., E.M. Schauber, and W.D. Edge. 1997. Effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on the behavior and demography of gray-tailed voles. Conservation Biology 11: 945–956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lidicker, W.Z., Peterson, J.A. (1999). Responses of Small Mammals to Habitat Edges. In: Barrett, G.W., Peles, J.D. (eds) Landscape Ecology of Small Mammals. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-21622-5_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-21622-5_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-5640-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-21622-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics