Summary
The potential role of food and water in determining 1) the timing of the normal breeding season in the California vole, and 2) two frequently occurring exceptions to this normal pattern, are explored by using experimentally manipulated enclosed populations. Hypotheses derived from field observations were tested in the enclosed populations by the manipulation of green food, dry food, water, and vole density. The results of three experiments involving five populations are reported. In all populations densities were maintained at near-normal levels (475 to 1750 per ha).
In all three experiments, it was shown that breeding was possible in the summer if sufficient food and water were available, although perhaps with reduced litter sizes and rates of growth and reproductive maturation of young. In two cases, severe weight losses and high mortality were induced by insufficient water. When water was provided, survivors recovered weight and reproductive competency in between five weeks and eight months. In three populations, starvation induced weight losses and mortality. In these cases recovery of the voles took only one month or less. In two of these last, the inadequate food situation was produced during the normally wet season by outbreaks of a European slug.
It is concluded that available moisture is the most important factor in triggering both the end and beginning of the normal breeding season. Of course, inadequately fed mice do not breed at any season. Summer (dry season) breeding can occur when food and water conditions are adequate due to locally favorable conditions or very low population densities. Prolonged delays in growth and reproduction following the return of favorable conditions are most likely the consequence of chronic and severe water deprivation.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Batzli, G. O. andF. A. Pitelka (1971) Condition and diet of cycling populations of the California vole,Microtus californicus.J. Mamm. 52: 141–163.
Brant, D. H. (1962) Measures of the movements and population densities of small rodents.Univ. Calif. Publ. Zool. 62: 105–184.
Chitty, D., D. Pimentel andC. J. Krebs (1968) Food supply of overwintered voles.J. Anim. Ecol. 37: 113–120.
Church, R. L. (1966) Water exchanges of the California vole,Microtus californicus.Physiol. Zool. 39: 326–340.
Clarke, J. R. (1955) Influence of numbers on reproduction and survival in two experimental vole populations.Proc. Roy. Soc. London (Ser. B)144: 68–85.
Frank, F. (1954) Beiträge zur Biologie der Feldmaus,Microtus arvalis (Pallas). Teil I. Gehegeversuche.Zool Jahrb (Abt. Syst., Ökol. u. Geog. der Tiere)82: 354–404.
Gentry, J. B. (1968) Dynamics of an enclosed population of pine mice,Microtus pinetorm.Res. Pop. Ecol. 10: 21–30.
Greenwald, G. S. (1957) Reproduction in a coastal California population of the field mouseMicrotus californicus.Univ. Calif. Publ. Zool. 54: 421–446.
Hoffmann, R. S. (1958) The role of reproduction and mortality in population fluctuations of voles (Microtus).Ecol. Monogr. 28: 79–109.
Houlihan, R. T. (1963) The relationship of population density to endocrine and metabolic changes in the California voleMicrotus californicus.Univ Calif. Publ. Zool. 65: 327–362.
Krebs, C. J. (1966) Demographic changes in fluctuating populations ofMicrotus californicus.Ecol. Monogr. 36: 239–273.
Krebs, C. J. andK. T. De Long (1965) AMicrotus population with supplemental food.J. Mamm. 46: 566–573.
Krebs, C. J., B. L. Keller andR. H. Tamarin (1969)Microtus population biology: demographic changes in fluctuating populations ofM. ochrogaster andM. pennsylvanicus in southern Indiana.Ecology 50: 587–607.
Lidicker, W. Z., Jr. (1973) Regulation of numbers in an island population of the California vole, a problem in community dynamics.Ecol. Monogr. 43: 271–302.
Lidicker, W. Z., Jr. andP. K. Anderson (1962) Colonization of an island byMicrotus californicus, analyzed on the basis of runway transects.J. Anim. Ecol. 31: 503–517.
Louch, C. D. (1956) Adrenalcortical activity in relation to the density and dynamics of three confined populations ofMicrotus pennsylvanicus.Ecology 37: 701–713.
Lund, M. (1970) Diurnal activity and distribution ofArvicola terrestris terrestris L. in an outdoor enclosure.EPPO Public. Ser. A, no. 58: 147–158.
Myers, J. H. andC. J. Krebs (1971) Sex ratios in open and enclosed vole populations: demographic implications.Amer. Nat. 105: 325–344.
Pearson, O. P. (1960) Habits ofMicrotus californicus revealed by automatic photographic recorders.Ecol. Monogr. 30: 231–249.
Pearson, O. P. (1963) History of two local outbreaks of feral house mice.Ecology 44: 540–549.
Pearson, O. P. (1964) Carnivore-mouse predation: an example of its intensity and bioenergetics.J. Mamm. 45: 177–188.
Pinter, A. J. andN. C. Negus (1965) Effects of nutrition and photoperiod on reproductive physiology ofMicrotus montanus.Amer. J. Physiol. 208: 633–638.
Weigert, R. G. (1972) Population dynamics of cotton rats (Sigmodon hispidus) and meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus) in field enclosures in South Carolina.Bull. Georgia Acad. Sci. 30: 103–110.
Wijngaarden, A. Van (1960) The population dynamics of four confined populations of the Continental voleMicrotus arvalis (Pallas).R. I. V. O. N. Mededeling no. 84: 1–28.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lidicker, W.Z. Experimental manipulation of the timing of reproduction in the California vole. Res Popul Ecol 18, 14–27 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02754079
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02754079