Abstract
There are many sources of variability in gene–phenotype associations. During the measurement of genotype and phenotype and during selection, researchers must deal with experimental error in trials; gene-gene interaction (epistasis) for sub-traits and observed traits; trait-trait interaction (pleiotropy) and gene- or genotype-by-environment interaction. These effects can be structured in a framework that allows simulation of the entire gene-environment ‘landscape’. Studies of these landscapes have been published by others. Here we aim to explain with simple examples some of the types of insights that can be made. A current challenge for breeders working with simple marker–phenotype associations is to design selection strategies that can rapidly create new combinations of multiple marker-based traits. For a real-world example in wheat, we have used simulation to show how gene enrichment during early generations (selection of homozygotes and heterozygotes with desirable alleles) can greatly reduce resource requirements when combining 9 genes into one genotype through marker-assisted selection. Another wheat example compares phenotypic and QTL-based selection for coleoptile length where the QTL also had a pleiotropic association with plant height. These simulations show the relative negative effects of either low heritability, or less than complete detection of QTL associated with traits. Finally, we revisit a marker-assisted selection (MAS) example whereby a QTL study is undertaken on a population for a complex trait, and then those QTL are used in selection. This process is subject to all sources of error described above. If the trait is complex, then interactions among sub-traits; between sub-traits and the environment; or between the chromosomal locations of controlling genes, create an extremely ‘rugged’ selection landscape that slows breeding progress. In this situation, a detailed understanding of some of these interactions is required if MAS is to be able to exceed the progress of conventional breeding.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
References
Bernardo, R. and Charcosset, A., 2006. Usefulness of gene information in marker-assisted recurrent selection: a simulation appraisal. Crop Science, 46 (2), 614-621.
Bonnett, D.G., Rebetzke, G.J. and Spielmeyer, W., 2005. Strategies for efficient implementation of molecular markers in wheat breeding. Molecular Breeding, 15 (1), 75-85.
Chapman, S.C., Cooper, M., Podlich, D., et al., 2003. Evaluating plant breeding strategies by simulating gene action and dryland environment effects. Agronomy Journal, 95 (1), 99-113.
Cooper, M., Podlich, D.W. and Smith, O.S., 2005. Gene-to-phenotype models and complex trait genetics. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 56 (9), 895-918.
Duvick, D.N., Smith, J.S.C. and Cooper, M., 2004. Long-term selection in a commercial hybrid maize breeding program. Plant Breeding Reviews, 24 (2), 109-152.
Eagles, H.A., Bariana, H.S., Ogbonnaya, F.C., et al., 2001. Implementation of markers in Australian wheat breeding. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 52 (11/12), 1349-1356.
Ellis, M.H., Spielmeyer, W., Gale, K.R., et al., 2002. “Perfect” markers for the Rht-B1b and Rht-D1b dwarfing genes in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 105 (6/7), 10381042.
Hammer, G.L., Chapman, S., Van Oosterom, E., et al., 2005. Trait physiology and crop modelling as a framework to link phenotypic complexity to underlying genetic systems. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 56 (9), 947-960.
Ogbonnaya, F.C., Subrahmanyam, N.C., Moullet, O., et al., 2001. Diagnostic DNA markers for cereal cyst nematode resistance in bread wheat. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 52 (11/12), 1367-1374.
Openshaw, S. and Frascaroli, E., 1997. QTL detection and marker-assisted selection for complex traits in maize. Annual Corn Sorghum Research Conference Proceedings, 52, 44-53.
Podlich, D.W. and Cooper, M., 1998. QU-GENE: a simulation platform for quantitative analysis of genetic models. Bioinformatics, 14 (7), 632-653.
Podlich, D.W., Winkler, C.R. and Cooper, M., 2004. Mapping as you go: an effective approach for marker-assisted selection of complex traits. Crop Science, 44 (5), 1560-1571.
Rebetzke, G.J., Appels, R., Morrison, A.D., et al., 2001. Quantitative trait loci on chromosome 4B for coleoptile length and early vigour in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 52 (11/12), 1221-1234.
Rebetzke, G.J., Ellis, M.H., Bonnett, D.G., et al., in press. Molecular mapping of genes for coleoptile growth in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics .
Wang, J., Van Ginkel, M., Podlich, D., et al., 2003. Comparison of two breeding strategies by computer simulation. Crop Science, 43 (5), 1764-1773.
Wang, J., Eagles, H.A., Trethowan, R., et al., 2005. Using computer simulation of the selection process and known gene information to assist in parental selection in wheat quality breeding. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 56 (5), 465-473.
Wang, J., Chapman, S.C., Bonnett, D.B., et al., in press. Application of population genetic theory and simulation models to efficiently pyramid multiple genes via marker-assisted selection. Crop Science .
Xu, Y., Beachell, H. and McCouch, S.R., 2004. A marker-based approach to broadening the genetic base of rice in the USA. Crop Science, 44 (6), 1947-1959.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer
About this paper
Cite this paper
Chapman, S., Wang, J., Rebetzke, G., Bonnett, D. (2007). Accounting for Variability in the Detection and Use of Markers for Simple and Complex Traits. In: Spiertz, J., Struik, P., Laar, H.V. (eds) Scale and Complexity in Plant Systems Research. Wageningen UR Frontis Series, vol 21. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-5906-X_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-5906-X_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-5904-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-5906-3
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)