Abstract
Agricultural policies are increasingly replaced by agro-environmental and rural-development polices. The rationale behind this evolution is that the policies seek to enhance the sustainability of agricultural systems and contributions from these systems to sustainable development at large. The same can be argued for agricultural innovations; they are increasingly aimed at serving a range of sustainability objectives, rather than only improving productivity and quality. As a result, resource use issues related to agriculture must be analysed and addressed from an integrated and multi-scale perspective. Both the introduction of alternative agricultural resource use options and agro-environmental policies would benefit from their ex ante assessment. Contributions from agronomy to such integrated assessment have strong implications for its research agenda. This chapter presents an extensive example of a multi-scale assessment methodology (SEAMLESS) in which agronomy plays a significant but partial role. The methods allow the investigation of different kinds of policies and innovations and their effects on economic, environmental and social objectives of stakeholders and decision makers at farm, regional and sector level.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
References
Barbier, B. and Bergeron, G., 1999. Impact of policy interventions on land management in Honduras: results of a bioeconomic model. Agricultural Systems, 60 (1), 1-16.
Belhouchette, H., Wery, J., Thérond, O., et al., 2006. Design of scenarios to assess the interactions between EU policies and the adoption of agro-ecology by integrated impact assessment using the SEAMLESS-IF framework. In: Proceedings of the IXth ESA congress, 4-6 September 2006, Warsaw, Poland . 11-20. Bibliotheca Fragmenta Agronomica no. 11.
Bland, W.L., 1999. Toward integrated assessment in agriculture. Agricultural Systems, 60 (3), 157-167.
Bouman, B.A.M., Jansen, H.G.P., Schipper, R.A., et al., 1999. A framework for integrated biophysical and economic land use analysis at different scales. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 75 (1/2), 55-73.
Brouwer, F. and Lowe, P. (eds.), 2000. CAP regimes and the European countryside: prospects for integration between agricultural, regional and environmental policies . CABI Publishing, Wallingford.
Dalgaard, T., Hutchings, N.J. and Porter, J.R., 2003. Agroecology, scaling and interdisciplinarity. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 100 (1), 39-51.
Deybe, D., 1998. Can agricultural sector models be a tool for policy analysis? An application for the case of Burkina Faso. Agricultural Systems, 58 (3), 367-380.
Deybe, D. and Flichman, G., 1991. A regional agricultural model using a plant growth simulation program as activities generator: an application to a region in Argentina. Agricultural Systems, 37 (4), 369-385.
Dogliotti, S., Rossing, W.A.H. and Van Ittersum, M.K., 2003. ROTAT, a tool for systematically generating crop rotations. European Journal of Agronomy, 19 (2), 239-250.
EC, 2002. Mid-term review of the Common Agricultural Policy . European Commission, Brussels. COM (2002) 294.
EC, 2003. Reform of the common agricultural policy: a long-term perspective for sustainable agriculture: impact analysis . European Commission, Directorate-General for Agriculture, Brussels. [http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/publi/reports/reformimpact/rep_en.pdf]
EC, 2005. Impact assessment guidelines . European Commission, Brussels. SEC (2005) 791. [http://ec.europa.eu/governance/impact/docs/key_docs/sec_2005_0791_en.pdf]
EuroCARE, 2002. Towards an analytical capacity in costing the abatement options for forestry and agricultural carbon sinks . EuroCARE, Bonn. [http://ec.europa.eu/environment/climat/pdf/eurocare.pdf]
Ewert, F., Van Keulen, H., Van Ittersum, M.K., et al., 2006. Multi-scale analysis and modelling of natural resource management. In: Voinov, A., Jakeman, A. and Rizzoli, A. eds. Proceedings of the iEMSs third biannual meeting “Summit on Environmental Modelling and Software”, July 9-13, 2006, Burlington, Vermont, USA . International Environmental Modelling and Software Society, Burlington. [http://www.iemss.org/iemss2006/papers/s9/128_Ewert_0.pdf]
Gallopin, G.C., 1997. Indicators and their use: information for decision-making. In: Moldan, B., Billhartz, S.B. and Matravers, R. eds. Sustainability indicators: a report on the project on indicators of sustianble development . John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, 13-27.
Guan, Z.F., Oude Lansink, A., Van Ittersum, M., et al., 2006. Integrating agronomic principles into production function specification: a dichotomy of growth inputs and facilitating inputs. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 88 (1), 203-214.
Harris, G., 2002. Integrated assessment and modelling: science for sustainability. In: Constanza, R. and Jørgensen, S.E. eds. Understanding and solving environmental problems in the 21 st century . Elsevier, Amsterdam, 5-17.
Heckelei, T. and Britz, W., 2001. Concept and explorative application of an EU-wide, regional agricultural sector model (CAPRI-Project). In: Heckelei, T., Witzke, H.P. and Henrichsmeyer, W. eds. Agricultural sector modelling and policy information systems: proceedings of the 65th European seminar of the European Association of Agricultural Economists EAAE, Bonn, Germany, 29-31 March, 2000 . Wissenschaftsverlag Vauk Kiel KG, Kiel, 281-290.
IMAGE team, 2001. The IMAGE 2.2 implementation of the SRES scenarios: a comprehensive analysis of emissions, climate change and impacts in the 21 st century . RIVM, Bilthoven. RIVM CD-ROM Publication no. 481508018.
Jansen, H.G.P., Bouman, B.A.M., Schipper, R.A., et al., 2005. An interdisciplinary approach to regional land use analysis using GIS, with applications to the Atlantic Zone of Costa Rica. Agricultural Economics, 32 (1), 87-104.
Janssen, S., Hengsdijk, H. and Van Ittersum, M.K., 2006. Agricultural management module of FSSIM: procedures to identify and quantify alternative agricultural activities: project deliverable of the SEAMLESS project . Wageningen University, Wageningen. [http://www.seamless-ip.org]
Keating, B.A., Carberry, P.S., Hammer, G.L., et al., 2003. An overview of APSIM, a model designed for farming systems simulation. European Journal of Agronomy, 18 (3/4), 267-288.
Kruseman, G., Ruben, R., Hengsdijk, H., et al., 1995. Farm household modelling for estimating the effectiveness of price instruments in land use policy. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science, 43 (1), 111-123.
Laborte, A.G., Van Ittersum, M.K and Van den Berg, M.M., in press. Multi-scale analysis of agricultural development: a modeling approach for Ilocos Norte. Agricultural Systems .
Lehtonen, H., Peltola, J. and Sinkkonen, M., 2006. Co-effects of climate policy and agricultural policy on regional agricultural viability in Finland. Agricultural Systems, 88 (2/3), 472-793.
López-Ridaura, S., Van Keulen, H., Van Ittersum, M.K., et al., 2005. Multi-scale sustainability evaluation of natural resource management systems: quantifying indicators for different scales of analysis and their trade-offs using linear programming. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 12 (2), 81-97.
Lu, C.H. and Van Ittersum, M.K., 2004. A trade-off analysis of policy objectives for Ansai, the Loess Plateau of China. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 102 (3), 235-246.
McIntosh, B.S., Voinov, A., Smith, C., et al., 2006. Bridging the gaps between design and use: developing appropriate tools for environmental management and policy. In: Voinov, A., Jakeman, A. and Rizzoli, A. eds. Proceedings of the iEMSs third biannual meeting “Summit on Environmental Modelling and Software”, July 9-13, 2006, Burlington, Vermont, USA . International Environmental Modelling and Software Society, Burlington. [http://www.iemss.org/iemss2006/papers/w6/pp.pdf]
Ojiem, J.O., De Ridder, N., Vanlauwe, B., et al., in press. Socio-ecological niche: a conceptual framework for integration of legumes in smallholder farming systems. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability .
Rapidel, B., Defèche, C., Traoré, B., et al., 2006. In-field development of a conceptual crop functioning and management model: a case study on cotton in southern Mali. European Journal of Agronomy, 24 (4), 304-315.
Rizzoli, A.E., Davis, J.R. and Abel, D.J., 1998. Model and data integration and re-use in environmental decision support systems. Decision Support Systems, 24 (2), 127-144.
Roetter, R.P., Hoanh, C.T., Laborte, A.G., et al., 2005. Integration of Systems Network (SysNet) tools for regional land use scenario analysis in Asia. Environmental Modelling and Software, 20 (3), 291-307.
Spangenberg, J.H., Pfahl, S. and Deller, K., 2002. Towards indicators for institutional sustainability: lessons from an analysis of Agenda 21. Ecological Indicators, 2 (1), 61-77.
Stöckle, C.O., Donatelli, M. and Nelson, R., 2003. CropSyst, a cropping systems simulation model. European Journal of Agronomy, 18 (3/4), 289-307.
Van der Wal, T., Knapen, R., Svensson, M., et al., 2005. Trade-offs in the design of cross-disciplinary software systems. In: Zerger, A. and Argent, R.M. eds. MODSIM 2005 international congress on modelling and simulation . Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand, 732737. [http://www.mssanz.org.au/modsim05/papers/van_der_wal.pdf]
Van Ittersum, M.K. and Rabbinge, R., 1997. Concepts in production ecology for analysis and quantification of agricultural input-output combinations. Field Crops Research, 52 (3), 197-208.
Van Ittersum, M.K. and Donatelli, M. (eds.), 2003. Modelling cropping system: science, software and applications, Florence, Italy, 16 July-18 July 2001 . Special issue of European Journal of Agronomy, 18(3/4).
Van Ittersum, M.K., Leffelaar, P.A., Van Keulen, H., et al., 2003. On approaches and applications of the Wageningen crop models. European Journal of Agronomy, 18 (3/4), 201-234.
Van Ittersum, M., Ewert, F., Alkan Olsson, J., et al., 2006. Integrated assessment of agricultural and environmental policies: towards a computerized framework for the EU (SEAMLESS-IF). In: Voinov, A., Jakeman, A. and Rizzoli, A. eds. Proceedings of the iEMSs third biannual meeting “Summit on Environmental Modelling and Software”, July 9-13, 2006, Burlington, Vermont, USA . International Environmental Modelling and Software Society, Burlington. [http://www.iemss.org/iemss2006/papers/s10/280_vanIttersum_1.pdf]
Van Tongeren, F., Van Meijl, H. and Surry, Y., 2001. Global models applied to agricultural and trade policies: a review and assessment. Agricultural Economics, 26 (2), 149-172.
Verburg, P.H., Rounsevell, M.D.A. and Veldkamp, A. (eds.), 2006. Scenario-based studies of future land use in Europe . Special issue of Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 114(1).
Veysset, P., Bebin, D. and Lherm, M., 2005. Adaptation to Agenda 2000 (CAP reform) and optimisation of the farming system of French suckler cattle farms in the Charolais area: a model-based study. Agricultural Systems, 83 (2), 179-202.
Wery, J. and Ahlawat, I.P.S., in press. Analysing and improving the role of grain legumes in cropping systems: a system approach illustrated on chickpea in India and Europe. In: Kharkwal, M.C. ed. Proceedings of the IV international food legumes research conference, 18-22 October 2005, New Delhi, India .
Wolf, J., Hack-ten Broeke, M.J.D. and Roetter, R.P., 2005. Simulation of nitrogen leaching in sandy soils in The Netherlands with the ANIMO model and the integrated modelling system STONE. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 105 (3), 523-540.
World Commission on Environment and Development, 1987. Our common future [Brundtland report] . Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ittersum, M.V., Wery, J. (2007). Integrated Assessment of Agricultural Systems at Multiple Scales. In: Spiertz, J., Struik, P., Laar, H.V. (eds) Scale and Complexity in Plant Systems Research. Wageningen UR Frontis Series, vol 21. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-5906-X_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-5906-X_23
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-5904-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-5906-3
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)