Abstract
The participatory mode of fisheries governance is based on effective communications that are able to bring together the viewpoints of many stakeholders so that management decisions can be generated. This chapter offers a discussion of the relationship between stakeholder participation as it is taking place on a European scale and the generation of formal scientific knowledge for the management of fish stocks under the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP). It examines the demersal stocks in the North Sea in particular. Stakeholder participation has been an important factor leading to demands for changes on the ways in which formal scientific advice is generated and communicated. The impacts on scientific deliberations of three such demands are examined: a) a demand that advice shift from the fish stock to the fishery as its basic unit of reference; b) a demand that advice not be open to different interpretation by the various stakeholders; and c) a demand that the results of existing technical fisheries management measures be examined when preparing advice. The chapter concludes that a flatter decision making hierarchy could make possible both a richer knowledge base and greater public support for management decisions.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
References
Bernstein, BB and Iudicello, S (2000) National Evaluation of Cooperative Data Gathering Efforts in Fisheries: A Report to the National Marine Fisheries Service, National Fisheries Conservation Center
Collins, H and Pinch, T (1998) The Golem: What You Should Know about Science, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
Festinger, L, Shachter, S and Back, S (1950) Social Pressures in Informal Groups, Stanford: Stanford University Press
Freudenburg, WR, Frickel, S and Gramling, R (1995) ‘Beyond the nature/society divide: learning to think about a mountain’ Sociological Forum 10(3):361–392
Gieryn, TF (1983) ‘Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists’ American Sociological Review 48:781–795
Guston, DH (2001) ‘Toward a ‘best practice’ of constructing’ servicable truths’” in M Hisschemoller, R Hopper, WN Dunn & JR Ravetz (eds) Knowledge, Power and Participation in Environmental Policy and Risk Assessment, New Brunswick NJ, Transaction Press
Habermas, J (1984) The Theory of Communicative Action: Volume I Reason and the Rationalization of Society, Boston, Beacon Press
Habermas, J (1987) The Theory of Communicative Action: Volume II Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reasoning, Boston, Beacon Press
Habermas, J and Nielsen, TH (1990) ‘Jurgen Habermas: Morality, society, and ethics-an interview with Torben Hviid Nielsen’ Acta Sociologia 33:93–114
Heritage, J (1984) Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology, Cambridge, Polity Press
ICES [International Council for the Exploration of the Sea] (2003a) ACFM Annual Report, Copenhagen, Denmark
ICES [International Council for the Exploration of the Sea] (2003b) Report of the Study Group on the Development of Fishery-based Forecasts, ICES CM 2003/ACFM:08 Ref. D
ICES [International Council for the Exploration of the Sea] (2003c) Report of the Working Group on the Assessment of Demersal Stocks in the North Sea and Skagerrak, ICES CM 2003/ACFM:02
ICES [International Council for the Exploration of the Sea] (2004) Working Group for Fishery Systems (WGFS) Annual Report, Copenhagen, Denmark
Jasanoff, S (2002) ‘Citizens at risk: cultures of modernity in the US and EU’ Science as Culture 2(3):363–380
Latour, B (1987) Science in Action, Cambridge, Harvard University Press
Loomis, DK and Ditton, RB (1993) ‘Distributive justice in fisheries management’ Fisheries 18(2):14–18
McEvoy, A (1986) The Fisherman’s Problem, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
Merton, RK (1968) ‘Science and democratic social structure’ in RK Merton (ed.) Social Theory and Social Structure, New York, The Free Press
Ostrom, E (1990) Governing the Commons, New York, Cambridge University Press
Peterson, MJ (1993) ‘International fisheries management’ in PM Haas, RO Keohane and MA Levy (Eds) Institutions for the Earth: Sources of Effective International Environmental Protection, Cambridge, MIT Press
Porter, TM (1995) Trust in Numbers: the Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life, Princeton, Princeton University Press
Rosenberg, AA, Fogarty, MJ, Sissenwine, MP, Beddington, JR and Shepherd, JG (1993) ‘Achieving sustainable use of renewable resources’ Science 262:828–829
Rozwadowski, HM (2002) The Sea Knows No Boundaries: A Century of Marine Science under ICES, Copenhagan Denmark, The International Council for the Exploration of the Sea
Scott, R (1995) Institutions and Organizations, Thousand Oaks CA, Sage Publications
STECF [Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries] (2003) Plenary Report #17, European Commission, Brussels
White, S (1988) The Recent Work of Jurgen Habermas: Reason, Justice and Modernity, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
Wilson, DC (1999) ‘Fisheries science collaborations: the critical role of the community’, a keynote presentation at the Conference on Holistic Management and the Role of Fisheries and Mariculture in the Coastal Community, November, Tjärnö Marine Biological Laboratory, Sweden
Wilson, DC and McCay, BJ (1998) ‘A governance model for environmental policy’, presented at Crossing Boundaries, The Seventh Conference of the International Association for the Study of Common Property, Vancouver BC, 10–14 June
Wilson, DC and Jentoft, S (1999) ‘Structure, agency and embeddedness: sociological approaches to fisheries management institutions’ in D Symes (ed) Alternative Management Systems for Fisheries, Oxford, Blackwell Science
Wilson, DC (2000) ‘Fisheries Management as a Social Problem’ in C Sheppard (ed) Seas at the Millennium Vol III, London, Elsevier
Wilson DC, McCay, Bonnie J, Rowan, V and Grandin, B (2002) ‘Institutional differences among marine fisheries scientists’ views of their working conditions, discipline, and fisheries management’ Fisheries 27(8):14–24
Wilson, DC and Degnbol, P (2002) ‘The effects of legal mandates on fisheries science deliberations: the case of Atlantic Bluefish in the United States’ Fisheries Research 58:1–14
Wilson, DC (2003) ‘Conflict and scale: a defence of community approaches in fisheries management’ in DC Wilson, JR Nielsen and P Degnbol (eds) The Fisheries Co-management Experience: Accomplishments, Challenges and Prospects, Dordrecht The Netherlands, Kluwer Academic Publishers
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wilson, D.C., Delaney, A.E. (2005). Scientific Knowledge and Participation in the Governance of Fisheries in the North Sea. In: Gray, T.S. (eds) Participation in Fisheries Governance. Reviews: Methods and Technologies in Fish Biology and Fisheries, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3778-3_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3778-3_19
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-3777-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-3778-8
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)