Abstract
This article argues for a limited role of the text in Greek mathematics, in two senses of “text”: the verbal as opposed to the visual; and the literate as opposed to the “oral” (understood in a wide sense). The Greek mathematical argument proceeds not within the confines of the verbal alone, but essentially relies upon diagrams. On the other hand, it does not use other specific techniques, such as those of the modern cross-reference, relying instead upon verbal echoes. The two, taken together, suggest a model of scientific writing radically different from what we associate with our own mathematics. In methodological terms, the article surveys its evidence in detail, and makes comments concerning the methodology of studying ancient texts through the evidence of those texts alone.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
References
Heath, T.L. 1913. Aristarchus of Samos, the ancient Copernicus. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.
Heiberg, J.L. 1883. Euclidis Elementa, 5 vols. Leipzig: Teubner.
Heiberg, J.L. 1891–1893. Apollonii Pergaei quae Graece exstant cum commentariis antiquis. Leipzig: Teubner.
Heiberg, J.L. 1910–1915. Archimedis opera omnia cum commentariis Eutocii, 3 vols. Leipzig: Teubner.
Mogenet, J. 1950. Autolycus de Pitane: histoire du texte suivie de l’édition critique des traités De la sphère en mouvement et Des levers et couchers. Louvain: Bibliothèque de l’Université.
Morrow, G.R. 1970. Proclus / A Commentary on the First Book of Euclid’s Elements. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Netz, R. 1999. The Shaping of Deduction in Greek Mathematics: a Study in Cognitive History. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
Taisbak, C.M. 2003. “Exceeding and Falling Short: Elliptical and Hyperbolical Application of Areas.” Science in Context 16: 299–318.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Netz, R. (2004). The Limits of Text in Greek Mathematics. In: Chemla, K. (eds) History of Science, History of Text. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 238. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2321-9_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2321-9_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-2320-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-2321-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawHistory (R0)