Abstract
In the scientific work of L. Vanhecke, the notion of curvature is never more than a step away, if not studied explicitly. This is only right, since, in the words of R. Osserman, “curvature is the central concept (in differential geometry and, more in particular, in Riemannian geometry), distinguishing the geometrical core of the subject from those aspects that are analytic, algebraic or topological”. The reason for this can be seen as follows:
-
if we equip a differentiable manifold M with a metric g, then its curvature is completely determined. If the metric g has nice properties (e.g., a large group of isometries), then this is reflected in a ‘nice’ curvature;
-
conversely, we can often deduce information about the metric from special properties of the curvature. In some cases, knowledge about the curvature even suffices to completely determine the metric (at least locally). Locally symmetric spaces are the prime example here: they are distinguished from non-symmetric spaces by their parallel curvature and, starting from the curvature, one can reconstruct the manifold and its metric (locally).
The curvature information is contained in the Riemannian curvature tensor R. This is an analytic object, a (0, 4)-tensor which is not easy to handle, in general, despite its many symmetries. It is often very difficult to extract the geometrical information which is, as it were, encoded within. For this reason, the famous geometer M. Gromov calls the curvature tensor “a little monster of multilinear algebra whose full geometric meaning remains obscure”.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
J. Berndt, E. Boeckx, P. Nagy and L. Vanhecke, Geodesics on the unit tangent bundle, Proc. Royal Soc. Edinburgh 133A (2003), 1209–1229.
J. Berndt and L. Vanhecke, Two natural generalizations of locally symmetric spaces, Differential Geom. Appl. 2 (1992), 57–80.
E. Boeckx, When are the tangent sphere bundles of a Riemannian manifold reducible?, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 355 (2003), 2885–2903.
E. Boeckx and L. Vanhecke, Characteristic reflections on unit tangent sphere bundles, Houston J. Math. 23 (1997), 427–448.
E. Boeckx and L. Vanhecke, Geometry of Riemannian manifolds and their unit tangent sphere bundles, Publ. Math. Debrecen 57 (2000), 509–533.
B.Y. Chen and T. Nagano, Totally geodesic submanifolds of symmetric spaces II, Duke Math. J. 45 (1978), 405–425.
P.T. Nagy, On the tangent sphere bundle of a Riemannian 2-manifold, Tôhoku Math. J. 29 (1977), 203–208.
P.T. Nagy, Geodesics on the tangent sphere bundle of a Riemannian manifold, Geom. Dedicata 7 (1978), 233–243.
S. Sasaki, On the differential geometry of tangent bundles of Riemannian manifolds II, Tôhoku Math. J. 14 (1962), 146–155.
S. Sasaki, Geodesics on the tangent sphere bundles over space forms, J. Reine Angew. Math. 288 (1976), 106–120.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Additional information
Dedicated to Professor Lieven Vanhecke
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Birkhäuser Boston
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Boeckx, E. (2005). A Case for Curvature: the Unit Tangent Bundle. In: Kowalski, O., Musso, E., Perrone, D. (eds) Complex, Contact and Symmetric Manifolds. Progress in Mathematics, vol 234. Birkhäuser Boston. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-8176-4424-5_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-8176-4424-5_2
Publisher Name: Birkhäuser Boston
Print ISBN: 978-0-8176-3850-4
Online ISBN: 978-0-8176-4424-6
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)