Abstract
In extremely low-dose protocols to reduce radiation dose to patients, computed tomography (CT) images suffer from increased bias and low signal-to-noise ratio in measurements. In this study, we consider three different non-positive corrections, flip, truncation and mean-preserving filter (MPF), affecting the measurement mean, propose a new variance expression for weights in weighted least-squares (WLS) reconstruction, and evaluate the impact on changes in the mean and variance of measurements. We simulated 1000 polychromatic CT sinograms of a chest phantom, including realistic levels of quantum and electronic noises. For the simulated scenario of 80 kVp and 0.5 mAs, compared to the conventional threshold and flip methods, the mean-preserving filter reduced the bias in post-log sinogram values by up to five times. Simple weights in WLS reconstruction that neglected the effect of non-positive correction limited improvements in the image quality. The advanced variance estimates considering electronic noise and the effect of pre-processing on the variance change made both WLS and penalized WLS reconstructions improve. Although the image quality improvement from a WLS reconstruction based on a Gaussian post-log distribution is inherently limited, the proposed method for estimating the post-log variance including electronic noise and the effect of pre-corrections from a single measurement leads to some improvements in variance estimates for post-log CT data and showed the feasibility of post-log iterative reconstruction for extremely low-dose CT imaging.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
N. Buls, J. Pagés, J. de Mey and M. Osteaux, Health Phys. 85, 165 (2003).
J. R. Mayo, J. Aldrich, N. L. Muller and S. Fleischner, Radiology 228, 15 (2003).
E. J. Hall and D. J. Brenner, Br. J. Radiol. 81, 362 (2008).
W. W. Mayo-Smith et al., Radiology 273, 657 (2014).
L. Zhou, S. Bai, Y. Zhang and J. Deng, Med. Phys. 42, 3265 (2015).
M. M. Rehani, Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 165, 3 (2015).
H. Imhof et al., Eur. J. Radiol. 47, 29 (2003).
J. F. Paul and H. T. Abada, Eur. Radiol. 17, 2028 (2007).
M. Mahesh, Pediatr. Radiol. 41, 493 (2011).
A. K. Hara et al., AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 201, 33 (2013).
S. Trattner et al., J. Am. Coll. Radiol. 11, 271 (2014).
J. Lambert, J. D. MacKenzie, D. D. Cody and R. Gould, J. Am. Coll. Radiol. 11, 262 (2014).
T. Xia et al., Phys. Med. Biol. 57, 309 (2012).
J. Hsieh, Med. Phys. 2, 139 (1998).
J. Wang, T. Li, H. Lu and Z. Liang, IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 25, 1272 (2006).
J. Wang, H. Lu, J. Wen and Z. Liang, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 55, 1022 (2008).
A. Manduca et al., Med. Phys. 36, 4911 (2009).
H. Zhang et al., Med. Phys. 41, 031906 (2014).
M. Bai et al., Med. Phys. 36, 95 (2009).
Z. Li et al., Med. Phys. 41, 011908 (2014).
I. A. Elbakri and J. A. Fessler, IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 21, 89 (2002).
J. B. Thibault, K. D. Sauer, C. A. Bouman and J. Hsieh, Med. Phys. 45, 4526 (2007).
B. Kataria and O. Smedby, Acta Radiol. 54, 540 (2013).
N. Buls, et al., Eur. Radiol. 25, 1023 (2014).
T. Klink et al., Eur. J. Radiol. 83, 1654 (2014).
E. Hérin et al., Eur. Radiol. 25, 2362 (2015).
J. Nuyts et al., Phys. Med. Biol. 58, R63 (2013).
L. Fu et al., IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 36, 707 (2017).
B. R. Whiting, Proc. SPIE Med. Imaging 4682, 53 (2002).
B. R. Whiting et al., Med. Phys. 33, 3290 (2006).
S. Zabić, Q. Wang, T. Morton and K. M. Brown, Med. Phys. 40, 031102 (2013).
K. Sauer and C. Bouman, IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 41, 534 (1993).
J. B. Thibault, C. A. Bouman, K. D. Sauer and J. Hsieh, Proc. SPIE Comput. Imaging IV 6065, 60650X (2006).
B. De Man et al., Proc. SPIE Med. Imaging: Phys. Med. Imaging 6510, 65102G (2007).
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge the helpful discussions of Adam Alessio, Jean-Baptiste Thibault and Ruoqiao Zhang and the CatSim from Bruno De man. This work is supported by the National Institutes of Health [grant numbers R01-CA115870, R01-HL109327], and by the National Research Foundation of Korea [grant number NRF-2018R1D1A1B07049296].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, S.M., Lee, TC. & Kinahan, P.E. Non-Positive Corrections and Variance Models for Iterative Post-Log Reconstruction of Extremely Low-Dose CT Data. J. Korean Phys. Soc. 77, 177–185 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.77.177
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.77.177