1 INTRODUCTION

Metal matrix composites (MMCs) are an exciting area of research, improving properties of elastic modulus, wear resistance, and strength of unreinforced metals and alloys [1, 2], as well as, titanium carbide (TiC) matrix composites receive constantly great attention because of their excellent hardness [3, 4], high flexural strength [4, 5], high thermal conductivity [4, 6], and extreme thermal [4, 5] and erosion stability [4, 7]. TiC is progressively used as reinforcing particles in composites due to its excellent performance, such as high melting point, high modulus, high hardness, high conductivity, low density [8, 9], excellent high-temperature strength [10, 11], thermal [12, 13] and mechanical stability [14, 15], excellent thermal shock and ablation resistance [5, 16]. Thus, according to the famous inherent characteristics, TiC matrix composites are considered a material of choice in many areas, such as cutting tools [4, 17], rocket nozzles [4, 9], and others [4].

It is confirmed that TiC is considered as an ideal candidate to strengthen the tungsten matrix [10, 11]. Then the addition of TiC can play an active role in improving the comprehensive properties of tungsten matrix composites [20] As well TiC is one of the popular reinforcing phases for iron matrix [12, 13]. The utility of adding TiC as a reinforcement element is explored by many works. Results showed that higher relative content of TiC can significantly enhance the electrical conductivity of Si/TiC–SiC/C composites [15]. In another study, the increase in the fracture toughness of NiAl by adding ceramic phases is confirmed by reference [21]. Researchers found that the ceramic reinforcement of 2TiB2 + TiC is more effective than that of TiB2 + 2TiN [21]. Adding that in ceramic matrix composites, TiC as reinforcing material exhibits large elastic modulus induced by its unique structure of the metal-like carbides, thus compensating for higher toughness of the ZrO2 [22, 23]. Among the carbides of transition metals, TiC has the highest room temperature hardness. TiC is one of the most wear-resistant materials used at room temperature [24, 25] However, the hardness of TiC decreases sharply with the increase in the temperature. TiC–TiB2 composite ceramics have been prepared in recent years due to the excellent plastic deformation resistance of TiB2 at high temperature and compared to single-phase TiC and TiB2 ceramic materials, the hardness of composite ceramic materials containing TiC and TiB2 is increased greatly [25, 26].

The size, distribution, and morphology of TiC particles have a great influence on the mechanical properties of final composites. Reference [8] reported the combustion synthesis and hot-pressing of TiC/Fe composites in the Fe–Ti–C system with different carbon source and molar ratio. The results showed that the size of TiC particles decreases with increase of Fe content in Fe–Ti–C systems produced by the same carbon source, while the particles change from spherical shapes to cubic shapes which can reduce stress concentration between the ceramic particles and the matrix [8]. Reference [27] investigated that the Fe particles in the thermal explosion of Fe-TiC composite layers on a steel substrate lead to a lack of exothermic heat for the completion of the reaction. Even in case of incomplete reactions, the distribution of hard particles in the iron matrix can improve the overall hardness of the sheath layer [27]. A notable TiC particle coarsening was induced by the Cr addition in the thermal explosion synthesis of TiC–Ni-based cermets, but adding Mo or W inhibited the grain growth and the final cermet had a lower relative density. The highest hardness value (18 000 MPa) was recorded for TiC–Ni cermet containing Mo. Hardness was 16 320 MPa and 15 110 MPa for cermets with W and Cr additions, respectively [28].

In another study, the reduction in the mechanical properties of TiC–Al cermets at room temperature after adding 5 vol % Nb and 5 vol % Zr elements produced by combustion synthesis and hot-pressing method, respectively, was due to the presence of intermediate phases and TiC grain refinement. Crystal mismatch at the Al–TiC interface improved the mechanical properties of final products [29], and the increase of TiC content, the hardness of cermets gradually increased as demonstrated by Hongwei Zhao and Jinhong Li in their work [30].

Another way to produce TiC-based composites is SHS involving thermite reactions. Thermite reactions play an important role in their reactive performance [31] and then for this reason, termites have become the focus of much research on the synthesis of materials and composites by several methods of elaboration. In this regard, Pavel A. Miloserdov and Vladimir A. Gorshkov [32] reported the metallothermic SHS of Al2O3–Cr2O3 ceramic reinforced with TiC particles from mixture containing 80–85% (TiO2 + Al + C) and 20–15% (CrO3 + Al) in order to prepare materials promising for use as tools in the machining high-strength steels with a hardness of up to 49 HRC. They showed that Al2O3–Cr2O3 + TiC final ceramic composite is colored bright red typical of ruby. This indicated that the Cr2O3 content in Al2O3 is more than 6%. They also found that Al2O3–Cr2O3 + TiC composite after 24-h milling followed by pressing and sintering is very dense and has density of 4.55 g/cm3, hardness of 20 GPa, flexural strength of 680 MPa, and crack resistance of 4.2 MPa m1/2 [32].

In this brief review, we studied the self-propagating high-temperature synthesis of TiC-based composites including the influence of using thermite reactions on the combustion process. The effect of mechanical activation before combustion synthesis, particle size of raw powders, stoichiometry, and additives was investigated, in terms of the combustion reaction kinetics, ignition and adiabatic temperatures, phase composition of final samples and formation mechanism of TiC-based composites. The relationship between structure, microstructure, and mechanical properties of final SHS products was presented.

2 COMBUSTION SYNTHESIS OF TiC-BASED COMPOSITES INVOLVING THERMITE REACTIONS

The SHS reactions involving aluminothermic reduction of metal oxides were greatly used to produce TiC-based composites [31]. In this topic, the synthesis of TiC–MgO composite according to the reaction (1) TiO2 + 2Mg + C = TiC + 2MgO can be viewed as the sum of two sequential reactions, the first is a thermite reaction in which titanium oxide is reduced by the metal and the second involves the reaction between titanium and carbon, consequently the product of reaction (1) is multiphase [33]. Reactions such as Eq. (1) include highly exothermic thermite reactions and thus are associated with high adiabatic temperatures, as a result the formation of products occurs in the liquid phase [33].

A large number of investigations on the use of thermite reactions and SHS process to prepare TiC-based composites have been reported such as:

$$\begin{gathered} 3{\text{Ti}}{{{\text{O}}}_{2}} + 3{\text{C}} + \left( {4 + x} \right){\text{Al}} \\ = 3{\text{TiC}} + 2{\text{A}}{{{\text{l}}}_{{\text{2}}}}{{{\text{O}}}_{{\text{3}}}} + x{\text{Al }}\left[ {34,{\text{ }}35} \right], \\ \end{gathered} $$
(2)
$$\begin{gathered} 3{\text{Ti}}{{{\text{O}}}_{2}} + 4{\text{Al}} + 3{\text{C}} + x{\text{Fe}} \\ = \,\,3{\text{TiC}} + 2{\text{A}}{{{\text{l}}}_{{\text{2}}}}{{{\text{O}}}_{3}} + x{\text{Fe }}\left[ {36,{\text{ }}37} \right], \\ \end{gathered} $$
(3)
$$\begin{gathered} 5{\text{Al}} + 3{\text{NiO}} + {\text{Ti}} + {\text{C}} \\ = 3{\text{NiAl}} + {\text{A}}{{{\text{l}}}_{{\text{2}}}}{{{\text{O}}}_{3}} + {\text{TiC }}\left[ {38} \right], \\ \end{gathered} $$
(4)
$$2{\text{Al}} + 3{\text{NiO}} + {\text{Ti}} + {\text{C}} = 3{\text{Ni}} + {\text{A}}{{{\text{l}}}_{{\text{2}}}}{{{\text{O}}}_{3}} + {\text{TiC }}\left[ {39} \right],$$
(5)
$${\text{Ti}}{{{\text{O}}}_{2}} + {\text{C}} + 2{\text{Mg}} = {\text{TiC}} + {\text{2MgO }}\left[ {40} \right],$$
(6)
$$3{\text{Ti}}{{{\text{O}}}_{{\text{2}}}} + 3{\text{C}} + 4{\text{Al}} = 3{\text{TiC}} + 2{\text{A}}{{{\text{l}}}_{{\text{2}}}}{{{\text{O}}}_{{\text{3}}}}\left[ {40} \right].$$
(7)

When the aim of the study is the production of a specific material, thermites are used to produce some additional energy to favor a particular synthesis reaction [41]. For example, in the case where the thermite mixture surrounds the sample, it is only its exothermic aspect that is interesting, and therefore there is no interaction between the sample and the thermite blend [41] as seen in Fig. 1. Such an approach was demonstrated by the authors of [42]. They used the highly exothermic thermite reaction (8) Fe2O3+ 2Al = 2Fe + Al2O3 as a match to ignite another reaction (Ti + C) to form TiC. Reference [42] reported that the addition of alumina (Al2O3) as diluent is used to avoid explosion of materials. As for the other case where the thermite powders mixed with the other reactants, in that case, it is difficult to separate the products of the thermite reaction from the others [41] and the interest in these composites is focused on their intrinsic properties [33]. For example, the self-propagating high-temperature synthesis of TiC–Ni–Al2O3 cermet presented by reference [39] (Fig. 2). The authors used Ni addition to the (Ti + C) powders as the result of the aluminothermic reduction of NiO according to the reaction (9) 3NiO + 2Al = 3Ni + 2Al2O3. After (3NiO + 2Al) addition, reactions were highly exothermic and propagated rapidly through the raw samples. They found that the use of 5 and 10% of Al2O3 as a diluent slows down the reaction and the combusted pellets are not fractured. Alumina does not cause the extinction of the combustion front and the morphologies of all samples with additives are characterized by a lamellar structure (Fig. 3) [39]. We can add the aluminothermic reaction

$$\begin{gathered} 7 \times 73{\text{Al}} + {\text{C}}{{{\text{o}}}_{{\text{2}}}}{{{\text{O}}}_{{\text{3}}}} + {\text{C}}{{{\text{r}}}_{{\text{2}}}}{{{\text{O}}}_{3}} + {\text{F}}{{{\text{e}}}_{{\text{2}}}}{{{\text{O}}}_{3}} + 2{\text{NiO}} \\ \to 3 \times 66{\text{A}}{{{\text{l}}}_{{\text{2}}}}{{{\text{O}}}_{3}} + 2{\text{CoCrFeNiA}}{{{\text{l}}}_{{0.2}}}, \\ \end{gathered} $$
(10)

studied by Guannan Zhang and Xiao Yang [43]. They used this reaction to produce CoCrFeNiAl0.2(TiC)x (x = 0, 0.06, 0.12, and 0.20) by high-gravity combustion synthesis (HGCS). CoCrFeNiAl0.2 high-entropy alloys (HEAs) were obtained by inducing a thermic reaction between the several low-cost metal oxides (Co2O3, Cr2O3, Fe2O3, NiO) and Al powders. Then Ti reacts with C to form TiC followed by the dissolution and precipitation principle. The in-situ synthesized TiC and the small amount of BCC phase are accompanied by enhancing the compressive strength, bending strength, and hardness of composites by refining the grain of HEAs [43].

Fig. 1.
figure 1

Ti–C sample surounded by a ball-milled thermite mixture [42].

Fig. 2.
figure 2

XRD patterns of the sample 95%(Ti + C) +5%(3NiO + Al) + 10%Al2O3 [39].

Fig. 3.
figure 3

TiC–Ni–Al2O3 cermets with different initial composititions [39]: (a) 80%(Ti + C) + 20%(3NiO + Al) + 5%Al2O3, (b) 75%(Ti + C) + 15%(3NiO + Al) + 5%Al2O3, (c) 90%(Ti + C) + 10%(3NiO + Al) + 5%Al2O3, and (d) 95%(Ti + C) + 5%(3NiO + Al) + 5%Al2O3.

3 THE IGNITION BEHAVIOR OF TiC-BASED CERMET

In the combustion synthesis, the ignition characteristics are determined through the use of different experimental parameters, and understanding the ignition behavior of TiC-based composites requires understanding all the data surrounding the experiences. Various ignition methods result in various combustion processes. The ignition temperature is found to be sensitive to the particle size, using the thermite reactions, sintering additives, mechanical activation, surrounding atmosphere for samples, Hadi Ghazanfari and Carl Blais [21] demonstrated the thermal explosion of Fe3Al–TiC cermet from elemental powders in a furnace for 5 min with a heating rate of approximately 500°C/min. In this approach, pre-milling of reactants allowed not only the synthesis of the desired products (Fe3Al–TiC) without intermediate phases but also reduced the furnace preheat temperature from 1200 to 1100°C. They demonstrated that TiC reaction is ignited at 1100°C [21]. Moreover, it was found that using fine particles is beneficial to avoid the formation of undesirable phases and leads to lowering the ignition temperature [21]. When the Ti particle size was about 100 μm, the (Ti + C) reaction started at around 1450°C, but this temperature decreased to 1206°C with using finer Ti particles (between 40 and 100 μm) [21, 44].

Likewise, the C particle sizes play an important role in the ignition behavior and combustion characteristics in the Ti–C–20 wt % Ni system as presented in Fig. 4. Coarse C particles (∼38 and ∼75 μm) led to the appearance of two different combustion stages, the first and second ones were related to the formation of Ni–Ti compounds and TiC ceramic, respectively. The SHS reactions were incomplete with a few Ni–Ti compounds and unreacted C. In contrast, using fine C particle (∼1 μm), led to only one combustion stage and the final products consisted of TiC and Ni without any intermediate phase. Note that reducing C particle size caused an increase in the wave velocities and the ignition time became shorter. In addition to that, the morphology of TiC particles became almost spherical when decreasing the C particle sizes [45].

Fig. 4.
figure 4

Temperature–time profiles of 20 wt % Ni–Ti–C systems with C particle size of ~1, ~38, and ~75 μm during the SHS reaction [45].

In another investigation, the ignition temperature of TiC–TiB2/Ni cermet prepared by pressure assisted SHS from Ni–Ti–B4C in air was 415°C that was lower than that in vacuum (1040°C). This result was due to the heat generated from the oxidation and nitrification of Ti and the nitrification of B4C on the surface of compact at low temperature. In this study, the ignition temperature both in air and vacuum decreased with decreasing Ni content and Ti and B4C particle sizes. The authors added that low Ni content and fine B4C particle size is beneficial to the completion of the reaction [46].

The addition of metallic phase (as a binder) in the Ti–C system was considered in [47]. Cu addition serves as diluent and binder and as consequence plays an important role in the ignition behavior of the SHS process. It was found that the combustion temperature decreases with increasing Cu content, the ignition time decreases first and increases later (Fig. 5), and the system exhibits the shortest ignition time with the addition of 20 wt % Cu. The increase in the Cu content decreased the dwell time at high temperatures, and therefore the size of the particles turned to be finer (Fig. 6). Moreover, an increase in the metallic liquid phase surrounding ceramic particles rose the diffusion, reduced the driving force for ceramic particle growth, and prevented the sintering among ceramic particles to form larger ones [47].

Fig. 5.
figure 5

The variation of the ignition time in the Cu–Ti–C systems with various Cu contents [47].

Fig. 6.
figure 6

The fracture surfaces of SHS products from Cu–Ti–C systems with (a) 10, (b) 30, and (c) 50 wt % Cu [47].

A typical example of the influence of mechanical activation on the ignition temperature can be found in the following study. References [48, 49] reported that in the combustion synthesis of TiC composite from thermite mixture (3TiO2–4Al–3C), the ignition temperature decreases from 1079 to 698°C after 24-h ball-milling of initial reactants [48, 49]. In [36], it was observed too that the addition of Fe to (3TiO2–4Al–3C) mixture decreases the ignition temperature of the reaction between Ti and C when using the thermite reaction to obtain TiC–Al2O3–Fe cermet by SHS process.

Reference [50] reported that the ignition temperature of NiAl–TiC–Al2O3 composites obtained using Ni/Al with 0, 10, 20, 30, and 40 wt % TiO2/Al/C as additives is approximately 813.3, 852.6, 1005.3, 1039.6, and 1133.4 K, respectively. This means that the ignition can occur at a temperature below the melting point of Al (933 K), as the lowest melting point in the system. Authors explained this raise of the ignition temperature by that increasing the content of TiO2/Al/C absorbs more heat released by the NiAl reaction as consequences the heat required to initiate the exothermic reaction of the system increases, it reduces the thermal conductivity of the sample due to the addition of low thermal conductivity material TiO2, and results in a slower reaction rate of Ni/Al and it also reduces the contact between Ni and Al. Increasing the TiO2/Al/C content led also to a longer ignition time. This was because a lower amount of TiO2/Al/C had a higher content of the liquid NiAl in the product which, in turn, increased the thermal conductivity of the reactant [50].

4 ADIABATIC TEMPERATURE CHARACTERISTICS

The variations of the adiabatic temperatures of TiC-based materials synthesized by SHS are collected in Table 1. Literature cited that the experimental parameters such as stoichiometry [51, 52], particle size of raw materials [21, 44], increasing the TiC percentage [21] or additional component in the final cermets [53], mechanical activation before combustion synthesis [52] affect not only the heat release but also the kinetics of the reaction and the adiabatic temperature of the SHS process.

Table 1.   Adiabatic temperatures Tad of TiC-based composites synthesized by SHS method.

Results showed that the adiabatic temperature increases from 2102 K for Fe3Al–30TiC to 2887 K for Fe3Al–70TiC (Table 1, nos. 2–4) and the values are well greater than the melting point of Fe3Al (1723 K) [21, 58], then, an increase in TiC contents in the final cermets leads to rising in the adiabatic temperature values of the combustion synthesis considering that the titanium carbide formation reaction is an exothermic reaction, however the addition of Fe–Al to the initial mixture acts as a diluent for this reaction [21].

Mechanically activated Ti–xC powder mixtures (x = 1.0, 2.1, 4.2, and 6.3 wt %) were synthesized in thermal explosion mode in a furnace preheated to 800°C by G.A. Pribytkov and A.V. Baranovskiy [51]. Combustion products were (metal matrix) Ti–TiC composites containing different quantities of reinforcement agent (Table 1, nos. 5–8). Tad was found (Fig. 7) to grow linearly with increasing the mass percentage of C in the starting powder and reach its maximum at 1516°C, which is 164°C below the Ti melting point. This implies that combustion reaction occurred in a solid state reaction. Reference [51] also reported that the maximum combustion temperature Tmax grows with increasing the mass proportion of C in the initial powder but always remains below Tad by 490–530°C.

Fig. 7.
figure 7

Measured (1) and adiabatic (2) combustion temperatures as a function of x in the Ti–xC powder mixtures [51].

The researchers of [53] studied the effect of the addition of binder–polyvinyl butyral (PVB) on the adiabatic temperature and burning velocity of granulated (Ti + C) + xNi (x ≤ 20 wt %) mixtures. Figure 8 shows measured burning velocities U for mixtures 1 containing 2 wt % PVB and mixture 2 with 1 wt % PVB in comparison with burning velocity U0 of granules containing no PVB (curves 1, 2, and 4, respectively). One can see that, for both mixtures, the burning velocity decreases with increasing Ni content, which correlates with a reduction in adiabatic temperature (Table 1, nos. 9–13) [53].

Fig. 8.
figure 8

Burning velocities as a function of x of granulated (Ti + C) + xNi. U for blends 1 (solid curve 1) and blends 2 (solid curve 2); U0 for granules containing no PVB (solid curve 4); Uf calculated values for blends 1 (dashed line 3) [53].

In another work, S. Rogachev and S.G. Vadchenko [59] reported the SHS of TiC–high entropy alloy (HEA) CoCrFeNiMe (Me = Mn, Ti or Al). They found that both adiabatic temperature and burning velocity decrease with increasing mass fraction of CoCrFeNiMe binder (mb) as represented in Fig. 9. Such dependencies were predictable because only the reaction (Ti + C) had strong exothermic effect, while the HEA binder did not produce significant heat release. When the adiabatic temperature decreased below the melting point of Ti, self-propagating synthesis became impossible. This limit occurred at mb = 55 wt % for CoCrFeNiMn binder, 60 wt % for CoCrFeNiTi, and 45 wt % for CoCrFeNiAl. The combustion became unsteady, oscillating or spinning, near combustibility limits (dashed lines in Fig. 9) [59].

Fig. 9.
figure 9

The adiabatic temperatures (13) and burning velocities (46) for TiC–HEA systems with different HEA binders: (1, 4) CoCrFeNiMn, (2, 5) CoCrFeNiTi, and (3, 6) CoCrFeNiAl. The horizontal dashed lines show the melting temperatures of starting reagents [59].

The WC‒TiC‒Al2O3 composite was the result of the self-propagating high-temperature synthesis of the double thermite reactions of WO3‒TiO2‒Al‒C. The adiabatic temperature of the WO3‒Al‒C system was 3995 K; this value is higher than those previously reported in Table 1. However, Tad reached the minimum which corresponds to 2351 K for the TiO2‒Al‒C system. Bowen and Derby [60, 61] showed that the combustion front velocity in the TiO2‒Al‒C system decreases with the addition of the Al2O3 diluent because it reduces the adiabatic temperature [60, 61]. It was found in [61] that replacement of WO3 with TiO2 in the reactants decreases both the adiabatic temperature and combustion front velocity in a similar manner.

During SHS processing of the TiC‒Al cermet according to the reaction Ti + C + xAl = TiC + xAl, Al additive played an important role in determining the size, morphology, and formation path of TiC particles. But with Al content increasing, the adiabatic temperature, combustion temperature and sizes of TiC particles decreased greatly (Table 1, nos. 14‒16) [55]. The Tad values as a function of Al content in the blends are shown in Fig. 10. As seen, Tad rapidly decreases with Al content increasing except for a plateau with Al content ranging from 10–20 mass %, where Tad stays at 2767 K corresponding to the boiling point of Al. The appearance of the plateau resulted from the absorption of heat from the evaporation of Al. Once Al content reaches 50 mass %, Tad is just 1660 K, which is much lower than 1800 K. When Al content is up to 50 mass %, Tc is only 1630 K, leading to the failure of SHS reaction in Al–Ti–C system [55] but reaction can be ignited and self-sustaining combustion without external heat supply if Tad > 1800 K [62].

Fig. 10.
figure 10

Adiabatic temperature Tad and combustion temperature Tc as a function of Al content [55].

It was found in [36] that adding Fe to the (3TiO2 + 4Al + 3C) thermite mixtures from 0 to 15 wt % decreases the combustion front velocity and the SHS reaction auto quenches at 20 wt % Fe addition. Thus, the SHS reaction became unstable when the amount of added Fe increased from 15 to 20 wt %, (i.e.,1.21–1.71 mol). The adiabatic temperatures of samples containing 15 and 20 wt % Fe were 2157 and 1790 K, respectively. The last one appears lower than 1800 K (Fig. 11) [36].

Fig. 11.
figure 11

Simultaneous effects of Fe addition on combustion velocity and adiabatic temperature of reaction (3TiO2 + 4Al + 3C + xFe) [36].

The SHS method combined with direct consolidation for simultaneous synthesis and densification of TiC/Al2O3 composite from TiO2, Al and C powders presented a linear relation between the calculated adiabatic temperature Tad and different initial temperatures T0 [63]. Results showed that the adiabatic temperature of the reaction at 298 K is 2403 K. This temperature increased linearly with increasing initial temperature T0. These calculations indicated that the value of Tad is higher than that of the empirical value (1800 K) which means that the reaction between TiO2, Al and C proceeds in a self-sustaining mode. Also, this temperature exceeded that of the melting point of Al2O3 (2323 K) which indicates that the alumina phase was in the molten state during combustion. On the other hand, TiC phase was in the solid state because the adiabatic temperature is lower than the melting point of TiC (3100 K) in this study [63].

5 DIFFERENTIAL THERMAL ANALYSIS STUDY

M. Rezaeezadeh and M. Shafiee Afarani [61] reported the self-propagating high temperature synthesis of WC‒TiC‒Al2O3 composite powder. Their thermal analysis results confirmed that the aluminothermic reductions of WO3 and TiO2 are the first exothermic reactions initiated the SHS process. DSC curves of 2WO3‒4Al‒2C, 3TiO2‒4Al‒3C, and 0.8WO3‒1.8TiO2‒4Al‒2.6C systems are shown in Fig. 12. We can see several thermal events in these curves; endothermic peaks at around 657°C relating to the melting point of Al, exothermic ones are exposed in Fig. 12 and explained in Table 2 (nos. 1‒3). There is a difference of interpretation about the nature of the exothermic event at 1170°C (Table 2, no. 2). References [61, 64] showed that this peak results from the reaction between Ti and C and consequently the formation of TiC, but others [36, 61, 65, 70, 71] showed that this peak is related to the formation of titanium aluminides in the form of intermediate phases, with no evidence of TiC formation. We add from references [36, 61] that no TiC was obtained while heating the 3TiO2‒4Al‒3C system up to 1250°C. To obtain TiC during SHS, it was indispensable for the formation of a molten phase rich in Ti or even in Ti3Al. The melt accelerated the dissolution of carbon and facilitated the reaction between Ti and carbon, because the diffusion of solid carbon into Ti-rich solid phase needed long times which was beyond the SHS reaction time (a few seconds) [44, 61]. The DSC curve of 0.8WO3‒1.8TiO2‒4Al‒2.6C is presented in the curve (c). One can see a little overlapped events at 936 and 966°C which are caused by the aluminothermic reduction of WO3 and TiO2 in that order. In [61], the exothermic event at 1020°C was associated with the formation of WC, and the last one at 1221°C was due to the formation of titanium aluminide [57].

Fig. 12.
figure 12

DSC curves of (a) 2WO3‒4Al‒2C, (b) 3TiO2‒4Al‒3C, and (c) 0.8WO3‒1.8TiO2‒4Al‒2.6C systems [61].

Table 2.   DSC results of number of blends used to produce TiC-based composites by the SHS method

We note that the DSC results (Table 2) of systems are slightly varied, and this is mainly due to the raw mixtures used, as well as the operating conditions. Mixtures are heated at much slower heating rates in the DSC measurement than that in the SHS process that may make a significant difference in the determination of the reaction sequence and the formation of final products or intermediate phases, especially in the synthesis of complex phases by SHS. In another hand, the authors of references [21, 36, 44, 61, 64‒66, 70, 71] agreed and stated that no reaction is observed before melting of Al when using aluminothermic reduction of oxides to produce TiC composite materials.

6 FORMATION MECHANISMS

6.1 Solid‒Solid Reaction Mechanism

Heating rate has a significant influence on the mechanism and kinetics of the combustion synthesis method [21, 72‒74]. In the SHS of (Ti + C) at heating rate lower than 250°C/min, it was found that the samples are not ignited even after reaching 1550°C [21, 44] This occurred due to the formation of TiC interfacial layer around Ti particles by solid-state reaction with carbon. But TiC phase formation was observed at 1165°C before the formation of the TiC interfacial layer at a higher heating rate (350°C/min), The close contact between carbon and Ti led to the formation of TiC either from solid-solid reaction or from reaction of carbon with Ti containing liquid solution according to equation (11) Ti + C= TiC [21, 75, 76].

6.2 Dissolution‒Precipitation Mechanism

To understand this behavior, the researchers investigated the combustion of the Cu‒Ti‒C system. The SHS reaction starts with the solid diffusion reaction between the Cu and Ti particles, then the melting of TixCuy compounds occurs, the Cu‒Ti liquid form and spread over the C particles. The C particles dissolve into the Cu‒Ti liquid, resulting in the formation of the Cu‒Ti‒C ternary liquid; next, some TiC particles form firstly at the interface between the liquid and the C particles, where the carbon concentration is relatively high. With the increase in the temperature, carbon particles continue to diffuse into the Cu‒Ti‒C liquid and then TiC particles are gradually precipitated out from the liquid until the total consumption of carbon. So, the formation mechanism of TiC in the Me(metal)‒Ti‒C systems is always dissolution‒precipitation (Fig. 13) [69].

Fig. 13.
figure 13

The model corresponding to the mechanism of Cu‒Ti‒C system in the SHS process: (a) initial reactants, (b) formation of TixCuy compounds, (c) formation of Cu‒Ti liquid, (d) and (e) TiC particles were gradually precipitated out of the liquid, and (f) fully reacted region [69].

In the same subject, another example is that of the combustion synthesis of the cermet TiC–high-entropy alloy (HEA). The reaction mechanism of the cermet TiC–HEA CoCrFeNiMe (Me = Mn, Ti or Al) involves three stages. First, all metallic components melt when the temperature in the combustion wave exceeds their melting points and form the Ti–Co–Cr–Fe–Ni–Me multi-component melt surrounded by solid carbon particles. After that, during the second stage, carbon dissolves in the melt and crystalline TiC grains precipitate and grow in the molten matrix. At the last stage, crystallization of the HEA binder occurs, when the sample temperature decreases below the melting point of this binder [59].

6.3 Mechanism Involving Thermite Reactions

6.3.1 System with one thermite reaction

During the SHS of NiAl–TiO2–C systems, the composition of reactants was determined according to the following equations:

$${\text{Ni}} + {\text{Al}} = {\text{NiAl}},$$
(12)
$$3{\text{Ti}}{{{\text{O}}}_{2}} + {\text{4Al}} + 3{\text{C}} = 2{\text{A}}{{{\text{l}}}_{{\text{2}}}}{{{\text{O}}}_{3}} + 3{\text{TiC}}.$$
(13)

In this study, the product formation mechanism has three stages. The first one is initiated by the melting of Al and after the decomposition of the intermediate phase NiAl3 at 854°C, the reaction mechanism is the dissolution of solid Ni in the liquid Al. Other intermediate phases such as Ni2Al3 and Ni5Al3 can also be formed at this stage. In the second stage, the dissolution of Ni in the liquid Al occurs from 854°C to 1300°C. The third stage is dominated by the exothermic reaction of Ni + Al (heat of formation of reaction is ΔHf (kJ/mol) = –118.4 [77, 78]). After the Ni + Al reaction is complete, the heat released by the formation of NiAl becomes the ignition agent to initiate further reactions in the TiO2/Al/C system (ΔHf (kJ/mol) = –1074.7 [69, 7478]) to form TiC–Al2O3 phase. References [7880] reported that the combustion process of TiO2/Al/C systems involves two reactions: the metallothermic reduction of the oxide (TiO2) to form an elemental Ti, and the reaction between Ti and C to form TiC. These reactions are described in equations:

$$4{\text{Al}} + 3{\text{Ti}}{{{\text{O}}}_{2}} = 2{\text{A}}{{{\text{l}}}_{{\text{2}}}}{{{\text{O}}}_{3}} + 3{\text{Ti}},$$
(14)
$${\text{Ti}} + {\text{C}} = {\text{TiC }}\left( {\Delta {{H}_{{\text{f}}}}\left( {{\text{kJ/mol}}} \right) = -184.5{\text{ }}\left[ {46} \right]} \right).$$
(15)

6.3.2 System with double thermite reactions

The complexity of the mechanism of formation of ceramic–metal composites is illustrated by the result of the self-propagating high-temperature synthesis of the FeAl–TiC–Al2O3 cermet involving the double thermite reactions:

$$\begin{gathered} 0.6{\text{F}}{{{\text{e}}}_{{\text{2}}}}{{{\text{O}}}_{{\text{3}}}} + 0.6{\text{Ti}}{{{\text{O}}}_{2}} + \left( {y + 2} \right){\text{Al}} + (y-1.2){\text{Fe}} \\ + \,\,0.6{\text{C}} \to y{\text{FeAl}} + 0.6{\text{TiC}} + {\text{A}}{{{\text{l}}}_{{\text{2}}}}{{{\text{O}}}_{3}}. \\ \end{gathered} $$
(16)

The formation mechanism can be described by a series of steps as presented below. Aluminothermic reduction of Fe2O3 is considered as the initiation step as seen in reaction (17) Fe2O3 + 2Al → 2Fe + Al2O3 followed by reduction of TiO2 by Al in reaction (18) TiO2 + 4/3Al → Ti + 2/3Al2O3. Two reduction reactions do not only produce metal elements (Fe and Al), but also generate a substantial amount of heat to facilitate subsequent reactions. They include metal combustion between Fe and Al to form FeAl in reaction (19) Fe + Al → FeAl, as well as the reaction of Ti with carbon in reaction (15) to yield TiC [49].

7 RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN STRUCTURE, MICROCTRUCTURE, AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES

TiC is one of the promising reinforcements used in Mg matrix to augment and ameliorate its mechanical and physical properties [81, 82]. And in this regard, Mg–TiC@NiO nanocomposite powders were synthesized by combustion technique and the magnesiothermic reduction:

$$3{\text{Mg}} + {\text{Ti}}{{{\text{O}}}_{{\text{2}}}} + {\text{C}} = {\text{Mg}} + {\text{TiC}} + 2{\text{MgO}}.$$
(20)

This preparation is made through depositing a thin layer of NiO on the Mg–TiC composite. The starting powders were milled at 360 rpm for a maximum of 70 h. The hardness of Mg–TiC nanocomposite ball-milled for 60 h (Fig. 14a) shows a 42.37% increase as compared to that in pure magnesium and as stated in [81, 82], the presence of TiC particles inhibits dislocation motion and increases the hardness of the Mg matrix composite. An increase in the milling time to 70 h (Fig. 14b) decreased the hardness from 73.69 to 68.72 HV. However, the results showed that the maximum value of hardness (96.9 HV) was observed in the Mg–TiC@NiO combusted powders (Fig. 14c).

Fig. 14.
figure 14

SEM micrographs of Mg‒TiC nanocomposite after (A) 60 h and (B) 70 h of mechanical alloying and (C) combusted powders (C) [82].

The compressive test (Fig. 15) showed that the deposition of a thin (approximately 3 to 4 nm) layer of NiO (Fig. 16) on Mg–TiC particles manages to improve the strength up to 625 MPa but for the Mg–TiC nanocomposite ball-milled for 70 h the value (499 MPa) was lower than that of specimen ball-milled for 60 h (532 MPa). This result can be attributed to the overall particle size of the TiC reinforcements, which is 20 and 49 nm for 60-h and 70-h milling, respectively (Figs. 14a and 14b). The increase in particle size is related to the agglomerates formed during contact between the molten magnesium and other particles during milling [82].

Fig. 15.
figure 15

Compressive stress–strain curves of 60- and 70-h milled Mg‒TiC nanocomposite and Mg‒TiC@NiO combusted specimens [82].

Fig. 16.
figure 16

TEM image of Mg‒TiC@NiO [82].

Changing the amount of the TiC compound in the final composites has a significant effect on their mechanical behavior. In this view, reference [50] reported that the higher content of the TiC and Al2O3 in the combusted product NiAl–TiC–Al2O3 cermet as the result of the addition of TiO2/Al/C into Ni/Al mixtures improves their microhardness as revealed in Fig 17. Reference [49] reported that ceramic phases, TiB2/Al2O3 and TiC/Al2O3, increase the hardness of FeAl composites from 12.8 to 16.6 GPa while maximum fracture toughness values of the TiB2/Al2O3- and TiC/Al2O3-added FeAl composites are 9.84 and 9.16 MPa m1/2, respectively. Hongwei Zhao and Jinhong Li [30] demonstrated that the content of TiC has an important influence on the hardness of the ZTA–TiC–FeCrNi cermet samples prepared by high-gravity combustion synthesis. With increasing content of TiC the hardness gradually increases as shown in Fig. 18 [43] and this is the result of two factors. The first is the intrinsic high hardness of TiC, and the second is microstructure refinement and thus enhanced interfacial area with increasing TiC content. In the range from 5 to 20% the hardness increases slowly with increasing TiC content and the volume fraction of TiC is lower than that of FeCrNi, and then the FeCrNi/TiC phase keeps ductile. However, the hardness increases quickly in the range from 20 to 30% because at a higher TiC content, the volume fraction of TiC exceeds that of FeCrNi, and the FeCrNi/TiC phase become brittle, thus resulting in a clearly improved hardness. In contrast to the hardness, the strength and toughness of the ZTA–TiC–FeCrNi cermets do not always increase with increasing content of TiC and the maximum strength and toughness are obtained with 20% TiC [30]. In the study of CoCrFeNiAl0.2(TiC)x  (x = 0, 0.06, 0.12, and 0.2) composites prepared by high-gravity combustion synthesis (HGCS) and as shown in Fig. 18a, the compressive strength of CoCrFeNiAl0.2(TiC)x increases with the enlarged content of TiC from 1083 MPa at x = 0 to 2133 MPa at x = 0.2, but the fracture elongation decreases. The Vickers hardness tends to increase from 263 HV at x = 0 to 1183 HV at x = 0.2, and the bending strength of the composites firstly increases then decreases with increasing TiC content (Fig. 18b). However, the raise in TiC content is not always positive and favorable. It is seen that when this value increases, many cleavage fracture surfaces appears and the fracture mechanism of the CoCrFeNiAl0.2(TiC)0.2 changes to the brittle fracture.

Fig. 17.
figure 17

Microhardness of synthesized products prepared from (1 ‒ x)Ni/Al + x(TiO2/Al/C) with x = 0, 10, 20, 30, and 40 wt % [50].

Fig. 18.
figure 18

Mechanical properties of CoCrFeNiAl0.2(TiC)x (x = 0, 0.06, 0.12, 0.2) by HGCS with σ = 1200 g: (a) compressive stress‒strain curves; (b) bending strength and hardness [43].

The size and distribution of the synthesized TiC were sensitive to the change of the value of the high-gravity field σ (Figs. 19b and 19c) and it was found that the rate of micro-pores in the composites decreases significantly with the increase in σ which can significantly improve the mechanical strength of the material. In another result, when increasing the content of Ti, C and enlarging the value of the high-gravity field, the TiC precipitate sizes increase from submicron to micron, which means that the grain refinement of the alloy matrix decreases, resulting in the decrease of the mechanical properties of composites. Figure 19a presents the relationship between the value of σ and the formation of BCC phase in final samples. It was found that the synthesized TiC and the small amount of BCC phase are accompanied by enhancing the compressive strength, bending strength, and hardness of composites by refining the grain of HEA [43].

Fig. 19.
figure 19

(a) XRD patterns and SEM images of CoCrFeNiAl0.2(TiC)0.12 prepared by HGCS with different high-gravity field σ: (b) σ = 1800 g, (c) σ = 600 g [43].

It can be seen from Fig. 20 that the workhardening rate of the composite 50 vol % (TiC + TiB2)/Al with Mg addition prepared by combustion synthesis and hot-pressing method is the highest, and this can improve the workhardening ability of the cermet, which makes it more capable of accumulating dislocations and hindering deformation. The solution strengthening resulted in severe dislocation multiplication and improved work hardening capacity, at the same time it reduced the rate of movable dislocations and the ability of the soft phase α-Al to coordinate the composite deformation, and consequently, reducing the plasticity and toughness. The dislocation multiplication caused by work hardening leads to an important reduction in plasticity and ultimately decreases in the toughness of the composites [83].

Fig. 20.
figure 20

Workhardening rate curves [83].

Results revealed that the fracture mechanism of the composites 50 vol% (TiC + TiB2)/Al composites with different alloy elements (Mg, Zn) is mainly the interface cracking between ceramic particles and Al matrix (Fig. 21). So, the interface plays an important role in the initiation and propagation of cracks. The ceramic particles were refined and increased as a result of the addition of Mg, and the stress concentration at the tip of crack was minimized by a big number of small ceramic particles evenly dispersed to prevent the crack initiation. In addition, ceramic particles can change the direction of the propagation path of the main crack and during the propagation process, micro cracks are formed. So, the crack elongates along the path of interface propagation and consumes more fracture energy, which ameliorates the toughness of the composite. Adding alloy elements reduce the fracture strain of the composite and consequently decrease the toughness, and the reason of this is the lattice distortion caused by solid solution strengthening and the stress concentration caused by dislocation accumulation [83].

Fig. 21.
figure 21

Schematic of strengthening and fracture mechanism for (a) 50 vol % (TiC + TiB2)/Al‒6 wt % Mg and (b) 50 vol % (TiC + TiB2)/Al‒6 wt % Zn [83].

The addition of 5 vol % Ta, Nb, and Zr to 70 vol % TiC/Al cermets prepared by combustion synthesis and hot-pressing method, respectively, refines the size of TiC ceramic particles. This can significantly reduce the rate and size of cracks and pores in the cermet microstructure too. Reference [29] reported that the main strengthening mechanisms of adding alloying elements to improve the mechanical properties of these cermets are solid solution strengthening, TiC grain refinement, and crystal mismatch at the Al/TiC interface. The decrease in mechanical properties at room temperature is mainly due to the generation of intermediate phases. Ta, Nb, and Zr elements generate (Ti,X)C (X = Ta, Nb, and Zr) solid solutions and Al3X (X = Ta, Nb, and Zr) intermediate phases during the reaction process, changing the lattice parameters of Al and TiC. As shown in Fig. 22, both (111) TiC and (111) Al diffraction lines shift to a lower degree as compared to cermet TiC/Al. It indicates that the solution of alloying elements into the aluminum matrix and TiC lattice may cause the lattice distortion of Al and TiC. TiC lattice expands, and its lattice constant becomes larger. The addition of Ta and Nb reduces the crystal mismatch at the Al/TiC interface [29].

Fig. 22.
figure 22

The XRD patterns of (1) TiC/Al, (2) TiC/Al‒Ta, (3) TiC/Al‒Nb, and (4) TiC/Al‒Zr samples: (a) diffraction peak of TiC (111); (b) diffraction peak of Al (111) [29].

Figure 23 shows the room temperature and high temperature (300°C) compression engineering stress–strain curves of TiC/Al, TiC/Al–Ta, TiC/Al–Nb, and TiC/Al–Zr. The yield strength (σ0.2), ultimate compression strength (σUCS), and fracture strain (εf) of TiC/Al cermet at room temperature are 880.6 MPa, 978 MPa, and 8.47%, respectively, but results show that adding Ta and Zr at room temperature can increase σ0.2 and σUCS and damage the εf value. In contrast, the addition of Nb reduces the σ0.2, σUCS and εf of the combusted cermet. As for high-temperature (300°C) compression properties, the addition of Ta and Zr elements significantly increases σ0.2, σUCS and εf. By comparison, the addition of Nb element can improve σUCS and εf of the cermet, although slightly decreasing σ0.2 [29].

Fig. 23.
figure 23

Compressive engineering stress‒strain curves of (1) TiC/Al, (2) TiC/Al‒Ta, (3) TiC/Al‒Nb, and (4) TiC/Al‒Zr samples: (a) room temperature, (b) high temperature (300°C) [29].

According to [26, 84, 85], the strengthening and toughening of the ceramic are dependent on the defect size controlled by the refined microstructure, and also determined by fracture behavior of the ceramic able to present intensive toughening mechanisms. Due to the highest elastic modulus of TiB2 as compared to TiC and Al2O3 (the average modulus of elasticity of TiB2, TiC, and Al2O3 are 570, 450, and 400 GPa, respectively [26, 85]), TiB2 phase releases the highest elastic strain energy among all phases in the solidified TiC–TiB2 composite ceramics with a series of TiB2 mole content, prepared by combustion synthesis in high-energy field, during fracture. That intercrystalline fracture usually takes place at the boundaries of TiB2 platelets, except that transgranular fracture sometimes happens in some coarsened TiB2 platelets containing defects and microcracks. Fine TiB2 platelets play a predominant role in strengthening and toughening ceramic by initiating an intensive coupled toughening mechanism of crack deflection, crack-bridging and pull-out. The highest flexural strength of the TiC–50% TiB2 (860 ± 35 MPa) benefits from the presence of the lowest content of Al2O3 inclusions, low content of minor Cr–W–Ti borides, and high-volume fraction of TiB2. The achievements of fine-grained even ultrafine-grained microstructure in the nearfull-density ceramic (98.7%) and high fracture toughness (13.5 ± 1.5 MPa m0.5 for TiC–66.7% TiB2 composite) contributed from an intensive coupled mechanism by a large number of fine TiB2 platelets (Fig. 24) [85]. In similar study, Figure 25 presents the fracture surfaces of the (TiCxNy–TiB2)/Ni composites with 0 and 5 wt % Al prepared by combustion synthesis and hot press. Without the addition of Al, most of the cracks propagate along the ceramics–matrix interface, while with the addition of 5 wt % Al, most of the cracks propagate in the matrix and traverse some of the ceramic particles. This means that the addition of Al can improves the matrix strength between the ceramic particles and the matrix. The enhancement of the strength of final products when enlarging the Al addition is the result of the refinement of the ceramic microstructures, the solid solution of Al in the Ni matrix, as well as the improvement of the interfacial bonding strength between the ceramics and the Ni matrix [86].

Fig. 24.
figure 24

Crack propagation paths of TiC–TiB2 composite ceramics: (a) TiC–30% TiB2; (b) TiC–40% TiB2; and (c) TiC–66.7% TiB2 [85].

Fig. 25.
figure 25

Fracture surfaces of the (TiCxNy–TiB2)/Ni composites with (a) 0 and (b) 5 wt % Al [86].

CONCLUSIONS

TiC-based composites can be successfully synthesized by self-propagating high-temperature synthesis (SHS) because of its numerous advantages such as dynamic of the combustion wave and high reaction rate that make reaction sequence possible, especially for the synthesis of complex phases like reactions including thermite ones.

Pre-milling of reactants increases the reaction kinetics, allows the synthesis of the desired products without intermediate phases, and reduces preheating and ignition temperatures of initial reactants.

Due to the large difference between the heating rate for DSC measurement and that required for combustion synthesis, determining the sequence of reactions varies according to the method adopted, particularly for complicated systems. Using low heating rates leads sometimes to the appearance of intermediate phases.

SHS exothermic reactions such as (Ti + C) involving thermite reactions are associated with high energy liberated and high adiabatic temperatures, consequently, the formation of the products occurs in the liquid phases.

Thermites are used to produce some additional energy to assist a particular synthesis reaction and Al2O3 can be employed as a diluent witch slows down the exothermic reactions.

The addition of metallic elements Cu and Al as a binder in the SHS of TiC to form cermets, serves as diluents and consequently, it affected the ignition behavior and adiabatic temperature, determining the size, morphology and formation of TiC particles.

Literature cited that the value of the adiabatic combustion temperature of TiC is in the region of 3210–3300 K. This value can be reduced when added metallic elements: Cu, Ni, Fe, Al.

The formation mechanism in the Metal–Ti–C systems is always dissolution–precipitation.

The formation mechanism of SHS process involving thermite reaction of TiC-based cermets can be described by a series of steps, and aluminothermic reduction of oxides is considered firstly. This reaction produces metal elements and generates a considerable amount of energy to assist subsequent reactions as well as the (Ti + C) reaction to form TiC.

TiC is one of the promising reinforcements used in metal matrix in the combustion synthesis of TiC-based composites in order to ameliorate their mechanical properties. The main strengthening mechanisms of adding alloying elements to improve these ones are solid solution strengthening and TiC grain refinement.

The strengthening and toughening of the final composite are also determined by its fracture behavior able to present intensive toughening mechanisms.