Abstract
The utility of antibacterials in the management of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB) and the related lung pathology, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), has been debated for decades. Data presented in this article document that more expensive antimicrobials may be favored in AECB treatment to prevent adverse outcomes to patients, namely antimicrobial failure and hospitalization. Identified patient-specific variables that may lead to treatment failure include right- or left-sided heart failure and ≥4 exacerbations/year. Risk factors for hospitalization include age ≥65 years and severe pulmonary and nonpulmonary dysfunction. However, these risk factors have never been formally validated in a prospective, randomized trial. Drug-resistant organisms have not been documented to cause antimicrobial failure or hospitalization, however, more data are needed in this growing area.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
It has been reported that chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the fourth leading cause of death in the US.[1] Estimates show COPD results in 14 million office visits and 500 000 hospitalizations annually.[2] Costs associated with treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB) are in excess of $US2 billion/year (1994 values). The goals of treatment of AECB are the prompt resolution of symptoms and the minimization of failure rates.
1. Causes of Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Bronchitis (AECB)
The organisms most implicated as causes of exacerbations are based on the severity of the disease. Nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis and Streptococcus pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, viruses (rhinoviruses, influenza A and B virus, parainfluenza, coronavirus, herpes simplex virus, respiratory syncytial virus, and adenovirus), Gram-negative pathogens including Pseudomonas aeruginosa and, in recent years, atypical pathogens (Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Chlamydia pneumoniae) have all been reported in investigations of AECB.[3] The three bacterial pathogens, H. influenzae, S. pneumoniae and M. catarrhalis, were estimated to account for 70% of all episodes of AECB in one report.[4] Other Gram-negative pathogens are recovered less commonly from bronchial secretions of patients with mild to moderate lung dysfunction and AECB; however, these organisms indicate particularly severe impairment of lung function, with forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) values ≤35% of predicted.[5,6] Viral causes of AECB have been estimated to cause up to 30% of exacerbations.[7] The common pathway for viral pathogenesis is to disrupt respiratory mucal defenses, allowing bacteria to attach to damaged epithelial cells in patients with AECB.[8] Chronic Chlamydia pneumoniae infection has been shown to occur in patients with COPD. In one report where C. pneumoniae was determined by two of three methods (namely serum antibodies to C. pneumoniae, sputum immunoglobulin A antibodies to C. pneumoniae and polymerase chain reaction of sputum for C. pneumoniae DNA), the incidence was 71% in severe COPD and 46% in mild to moderate COPD.[9] Finally, other atypical bacteria can precipitate up to 10% of bronchial exacerbations.[10]
2. Antibacterial Use in AECB
Current questions regarding the use of antibacterials for the treatment of AECB are whether all AECB are pathophysiologically similar to each other, and whether antibacterials used to treat AECB can prevent hospitalization and its associated morbidity and mortality? Furthermore, in patients that require hospitalization for their AECB treatment, is this because of patient-specific variables or an antibacterial-resistant pathogen? A vicious cycle of infection, inflammation and injury promoting further infection has been proposed, but the contribution of repeated episodes of infection to the progressive loss of lung function remains controversial.[11,12]
The use of antibacterials in the treatment of AECB has been under considerable debate since the early 1970s. Some placebo-controlled antibacterial trials for this condition have shown no positive results for antibacterials and some have shown moderate results in favor of antibacterials.[13] Certainly, economic variables enter into the decision-making process when selecting an antibacterial for AECB. As discussed by other investigators, the use of older agents — which have low per-dose costs — may in turn increase the total costs of treating this condition because of more office visits, noncompliance, treatment failure and adverse events.[14,15]
In 1987, a landmark study was reported by Anthonisen et al.[16] In this study, patients with a diagnosis of AECB and COPD were randomized to antibacterial therapy or placebo for the treatment of their chronic bronchitis exacerbation. Upon subsequent exacerbations, patients enrolled in this study were crossed over to the other arm of the study. The antibacterials used in this trial included cotrimoxazole (trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole), amoxicillin (amoxycillin) or doxycycline in standard doses. Patients were stratified in the study by severity of exacerbation based on clinical criteria. The results demonstrated that the success rate in antibacterial-treated exacerbations was 1.24 times higher than in the placebo-treated arm. Of importance from an outcome standpoint, 34% of placebo-treated patients experienced deterioration of their condition compared with 18% in the antibacterial-treated arm. Additionally, differences in the success rate between the antibacterial arm and the placebo arm were greatest in patients with the most severe disease (type I or II) and deterioration was more than twice as much with placebo compared with antibacterials. The authors present their interpretation of the study results and a comparison with previously published AECB antibacterial trial results.[17–23] In 1995, Saint et al.[13] published the results of a meta-analysis of nine randomized, placebo-controlled antibacterial trials that demonstrated a small statistically significant benefit with the use of antibacterials in the treatment of AECB. Currently, there are numerous antibacterials that are approved for the treatment of AECB.
Previous studies of antibacterials for AECB have not accounted for differences in disease severity among patients. Additionally, several randomized, controlled clinical trials investigating the usefulness of antibacterials for AECB were performed in the early 1980s and could not account for the current rates of antimicrobial resistance. The utility of bronchial specimens for culture has been questioned. Antibacterial selection for AECB is often empiric.
Destache et al.[24] have published a retrospective review of 60 outpatients treated for AECB. Pulmonologists categorized the antibacterial used to treat patients with AECB on initial, second and third presentations if they were separated by 2 to 4 weeks. Correspondingly, antibacterials were categorized as first-line (amoxicillin, cotrimoxazole, tetracyclines and erythromycin), second-line (cefradine, cefuroxime, cefaclor and cefprozil), and third-line (amoxicillin clavulanic acid, azithromycin and ciprofloxacin). Antibacterial failure was defined as failure of the patient to respond to initial antibacterials and requirement of further antibacterials within 2 weeks. Hospitalization rates were gathered from the records of patients who were hospitalized within 2 weeks of initial outpatient treatment for AECB. Economic variables and time between AECB intervals were also captured.
Medical records indicated that approximately 95% of patients received first-line antibacterials at their first outpatient visit. Twenty-three percent of patients who were given second-line antibacterials on the second visit were switched to third-line agents if conditions required a third visit.
Data analysis revealed that 34% of patients who were treated failed to respond within 2 weeks of treatment initiation. Patients who received first-line agents failed to respond significantly more often than those receiving third-line antibacterials (19 vs 7%). Patients who received first-line antibacterials were hospitalized significantly more often within 2 weeks of outpatient treatment than those given third-line agents (18 vs 5.3%). Finally, the use of third-line antibacterials was associated with significantly longer time intervals between exacerbations compared with both first-line and second-line antibacterials (34 vs 17 weeks). There was a statistically insignificant trend toward lower mean total cost of AECB treatment with the use of third-line agents, although the pharmacy cost alone was significantly lower for first-line antibacterials.
This was the first study to document possible differences between patients based on the antibacterial prescribed to them. Adams et al.[25] have documented in their study that patients relapse significantly more often when not given antibacterials compared with patients who received an antibacterial. Additionally, this study also documented that the highest relapse rates were in those patients who received amoxicillin. Therefore, these two studies suggest that the choice of certain antibacterials may decrease relapse rates and hospitalizations and their associated high costs.
Subsequent to the Destache et al. study,[24] Grossman[26] published a review of the treatment of AECB. In the article, he presented evidence that treatment success or failure may be based on specific patient variables. Patient-specific variables that have been identified include cardiopulmonary disease and the number of exacerbations/year. The cardiopulmonary diseases of importance include right— or left-sided heart failure. It appears from other studies, that patients with four or more exacerbations/year may be at risk of antibacterial failure and may require a third-line antibacterial, namely azithromycin, amoxicillin clavulanic acid or ciprofloxacin.[27,28] Additionally, there are identified risk factors that place a patient at increased risk of hospitalization during an acute exacerbation, e.g. age ≥65 years. Finally, significantly compromised lung function and severe nonpulmonary dysfunction places a patient at increased risk for hospitalization.[5,6] In his article, Grossman[26] offered a proposed classification of patients and suggested treatment options for patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis. However, it is important to realize that none of the patient-specific factors have been prospectively determined to present an increased risk of antibacterial failure or prevent hospitalization. Indeed patients with the most severe exacerbations (type I from Anthonison et al.[16]) were more likely to experience a benefit from antibacterials compared with patients with less severe exacerbations.[29]
Additionally, no study to date has documented whether the risk of hospitalization is related to the prevalence of a resistant pathogen. This needs to be determined, as it will have a major impact on the prescription of more costly antibacterials for patients that have severe lung dysfunction and are ≥65 years.
Several studies were presented at the 40th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (ICAAC) meeting. Ball et al.[30] presented an abstract comparing gemifloxacin, a new investigational quinolone, with clarithromycin. This study was a double-blind, randomized trial in patients with AECB who were followed for 26 weeks after enrollment. Patients who received gemifloxacin for AECB treatment had significantly fewer relapses compared with patients who received clarithromycin (71% success compared with 59%, p < 0.02). Additionally, 5 of 214 gemifloxacin recipients compared with 14 of 224 clarithromycin recipients required hospitalization (p = 0.059). Differences between the treatment groups may have been related to the isolation of Haemophilus influenzae; more study is necessary to confirm these results. Niederman et al.[31] presented an abstract comparing the antibacterial treatment intervals in patients with AECB receiving antimicrobial therapy. Patients were divided into those that received β-lactams (n = 185), macrolides (n = 180) and quinolones (n = 131). When the prescribing physician documented that the antimicrobial was used to treat a relapse, there was a significant difference in treatment intervals between patients who received quinolones compared with the other groups (27.5, 17.5 and 18 days for quinolones, macrolides and β-lactams, respectively, p = 0.03).
3. Conclusion
The research described points to a need to evaluate further the effect that exacerbation severity has on making an appropriate choice of antibacterial for the treatment of AECB. Certainly, an infection-free interval may be appropriate to use to compare differences between antibacterials in this patient population. Anuezto et al.[32] have written an editorial that outlines a protocol to test whether the infection-free interval is a valid outcome measurement for patients with AECB.
The choice of antibacterial in the treatment of an AECB episode remains controversial (see table I). More research needs to be gathered on whether newer antimicrobials prevent treatment failure and hospitalization to a greater extent than older antimicrobials. Finally, if newer antimicrobials do have a positive effect on outcomes, is this because of better coverage of the resistant organisms that may be causing the exacerbation? Investigating whether resistant organisms cause AECB as frequently as sensitive organisms, and determining whether resistance is a factor in the outcome of AECB would be of interest to all who treat these patients.
References
Celli BR, Snider GL, Heffher J, et al. Standards for the diagnosis and care of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995; 152 Suppl.: 77–120.
Morbidity and mortality: chartbook on cardiovascular, lung, and blood diseases. Publication no. 96-50. Rockville (MD): National Heart Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health; 1996 May.
Sethi S. Infectious exacerbations of chronic bronchitis: diagnosis and management. J Antimicrob Chemother 1999; 43 Suppl. A: 97–105.
Ball P. Epidemiology and treatment of chronic bronchitis and its exacerbations. Chest 1995; 108 Suppl. 2: 43–52S.
Eller J, Ede A, Schaberg T, et al. Infective exacerbations of chronic bronchitis. Chest 1998; 113: 1542–8.
Soler N, Torres A, Ewig S, et al. Bronchial microbial patterns in severe exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) requiring mechanical ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998; 157: 1498–505.
Buscho RO, Saxtan D, Shulz PS, et al. Infections with viruses and m. pneumoniae during exacerbations of chronic bronchitis. J Infect Dis 1978; 137: 377–83.
Hogg JC. Chronic bronchitis: the role of viruses. Semin Respir Infect 2000; 15: 32–40.
von Hertzen L, Alakarppa H, Koskinen R, et al. Chlamydia pneumoniae infection in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Epidemiol Infect 1997; 118: 155–64.
Beaty CD, Grayston JT, Wang SP, et al. Chlamydia pneumoniae, strain TWAR, infection in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am Rev Respir Dis 1991; 144: 1408–10.
Cole PJ. Microbial-host interactions in chronic respiratory infection. Clin Ther 1991; 13: 194–8.
Cole PJ. Bronchiectasis. In: Brewis RAL, Gibson GJ, Geddes DM, et al., editors. Textbook of respiratory medicine. 2nd ed. London: Bailliere Tindall, 1995: 1286–316.
Saint S, Bent S, Vittinghoff E, et al. Antibiotics in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations: a meta-analysis. JAMA 1995; 273: 957–60.
Ballow CH. Cost considerations in oral antibiotic therapy. Adv Ther 1995; 12: 199–206.
Pechere J-C, Lacey L. Optimizing economic outcomes in antibiotic therapy of patients with acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis. J Antimicrob Chemother 2000; 45: 19–24.
Anthonisen NR, Manfreda J, Warren PW, et al. Antibiotic therapy in exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Ann Intern Med 1987; 106: 196–204.
Tager I, Speizer FE. Role of infection in chronic bronchitis. N Engl J Med 1975; 292: 563–70.
Pines A, Raafat H, Greenfield JSB, et al. Antibiotic regimens in moderately ill patients with purulent exacerbations of chronic bronchitis. Br JDis Chest 1972; 66: 107–15.
Pines A, Raafat H, Greenfield JSB, et al. Antibiotic regimens in severe and acute with purulent exacerbations of chronic bronchitis. BMJ 1968; 2: 735–8.
Elmes PC, Fletcher CM, Dutton AAC. Prophylactic use of oxytetracycline for exacerbations of chronic bronchitis. BMJ 1957; 2: 1272–5.
Wade OL, Wilson TS. Value of ampicillin in the hospital treatment of exacerbations of chronic bronchitis. BMJ 1965; 2: 904–8.
Berry DG, Fry J, Hindley CP, et al. Exacerbations of chronic bronchitis — treatment with oxytetracycline. Lancet 1960; 1: 137–9.
Petersen ES, Esmann V, Honche P, et al. A controlled study of the effect of treatment on chronic bronchitis: an evaluation using pulmonary function tests. Acta Med Scand 1967; 182: 293–305.
Destache CJ, Dewan NA, O’Donohue WJ Jr, et al. Clinical and economic considerations in acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis. J Antimicrob Chemother 1999; 43 Suppl. A: 107–13.
Adams SG, Melo J, Luther M, et al. Antibiotics are associated with lower relapse rates in outpatients with acute exacerbations of COPD. Chest 2000; 117: 1345–52.
Grossman RF. Guidelines for the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis. Chest 1997; 112 Suppl.: 310–13S.
Snow V, Lascher S, Mottur-Pilson C. Evidence base for management of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Ann Intern Med 2001; 134: 595–9.
Baiter MS, Hyland RH, Low DE, et al. Recommendations on the management of chronic bronchitis. CMAJ 1994; 151 Suppl.: 7–23.
Wilson R, Tillotson G, Ball P. Clinical studies in chronic bronchitis: a need for better definition and classification of severity. J Antimicrob Chemother 1996; 37: 205–7.
Ball P, Wilson R, Mandell L, et al. Gemifloxacin long-term outcomes in bronchitis exacerbations (GLOBE) study — an assessment of health outcome benefits in AECB patients following 5 days gemifloxacin therapy [Abstract 812]. 40th International Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy; 2000 Sep 17–20; Toronto.
Niederman MS, Nickolson SC, Russo RL. Antibiotic use and antibiotic treatment intervals in patients with exacerbations of chronic bronchitis [Abstract 2222]. 40th International Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy; 2000 Sep 17–20; Toronto.
Anzueto A, Rizzo JA, Grossman RF. The infection-free interval: its use in evaluating antimicrobial treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis. Clin Infec Dis 1999; 28: 1344–5.
Grossman RF. The value of antibiotics and the outcomes of antibiotic therapy in exacerbations of COPD. Chest 1998; 113: 249S–255S.
Acknowledgements
There were no sources of funding or conflicts of interest for this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chock, A., Gong, V. & Destache, C.J. Antibacterials and Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Bronchitis. Dis-Manage-Health-Outcomes 10, 333–336 (2002). https://doi.org/10.2165/00115677-200210060-00001
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00115677-200210060-00001