Abstract
Background
Associated factors for frailty development according to age group remain unclear.
Objectives
To identify frailty score trajectories among community-dwelling older Japanese individuals and examine their associated factors.
Design
13-year longitudinal study.
Setting
Kusatsu Town in Gunma Prefecture, Japan.
Participants
1706 older adults aged ≥ 65 years who completed an annual frailty assessment at least once between 2007 and 2019.
Measurements
Frailty status was determined using an index based on the Fried frailty phenotype criteria. Potential associated factors for frailty trajectory included physical, biological, lifestyle-related, and psychological factors, as well as comorbidities.
Results
We identified five trajectory patterns in the frailty score from age of 65 to 90 years —individuals who were robust (Group 1, 10.5%) as well as individuals with late-onset frailty (Group 2, 16.1%), middle-onset frailty (Group 3, 25.6% and Group 4, 35.2%), and early-onset frailty (Group 5, 12.7%). Compared with the other groups, the early-onset group showed a higher prevalence of cerebrovascular diseases, bone and joint diseases, poor nutrition, sarcopenia, hospitalization, low cognitive function, and smoking at the end of follow-up. Associated factors in the middle-onset group largely overlapped with those of the early-onset group. The late-onset frailty group tended to have a higher association with heart disease and bone and joint diseases compared with the robust group.
Conclusion
Our findings from a 13-year longitudinal study identified five frailty trajectory patterns and seven associated factors for frailty trajectory. Proposed effective population-based frailty prevention strategies in each age group may contribute to effective strategies to extend healthy life expectancy in aging, aged, and super-aged communities.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Frailty is characterized by multisystem dysregulation of homeostatic mechanisms, including reduced physiological reserves and increased vulnerability due to age-related deficits (1). Frailty is an important risk factor for adverse health outcomes, including dementia (2), long-term care, and mortality (3–7). It is a reversible condition, with a previous study reporting that 13.7% and 56.5% of community-dwelling older adults improved and maintained their frailty status, respectively, within a mean follow-up period of 3.9 years (8). Moreover, frailty status can be improved by nutritional (9, 10), physical (9, 11), cognitive (9), and combined interventions (9, 10, 12, 13).
A previous study (14) described protective and risk factors for frailty in community-dwelling older adults. Specifically, several sociodemographic factors (education level and income), physical and biological factors (sex, obesity, albumin level, white cell count, and monocytes), lifestyle factors (dietary patterns, smoking, and alcohol consumption), and psychological factors (depression and cognitive function) were identified. Moreover, a recent review of frailty trajectories reported that the gradient of frailty progression was influenced by several factors, i.e., socioeconomic factors, social support, physical activity, diabetes, and brain pathologies (15). Although previous studies have revealed risk factors that affect the onset or progression of frailty over time, associated factors in frailty progression according to age at frailty onset remain unclear. Identifying modifiable associated factors for early-and middle-onset frailty would contribute to effective frailty prevention strategies to extend healthy life expectancy in aging, aged, and super-aged communities.
The present prospective study of community-dwelling older adults used repeated measures data on frailty status from a 13-year longitudinal study of rural Kusatsu Town, Japan. The present study had two objectives: to identify aging trajectories in frailty status from age 65–90 years among community-dwelling older Japanese; and to identify factors associated with this trajectory among these people.
Materials and Methods
Participants
In 2001, a longitudinal study was initiated in collaboration with the government of Kusatsu Town in Gunma Prefecture, Japan. This municipality had the census population of 6694, among whom 37% are older people aged 65 years or older. The main industry is hot spas and resorts (16). Annual preventive health check-ups were offered to all residents aged ≥40 years. In addition, participants aged ≥65 years underwent geriatric assessments. All older residents were invited to participate in annual geriatric assessments, which were all carried out in the same manner. The details of the Kusatsu study have been described previously (3, 6, 16–18). We reported the associations of frailty trajectories with mortality and medical and long-term care costs in Kusatsu town using the close methodology to the current study (18). The present study included those participants who underwent geriatric assessment and provided written informed consent under the conditions approved by the Ethics Committee of the Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology.
We included only individuals with complete data regarding the frailty score index obtained at least once between 2007 and 2019. Finally, we included 1706 adults aged ≥ 65 years. Average and total number of follow-up assessments were 4.4 and 7446, respectively (Figure 1).
Frailty assessment
Frailty status was determined based on the Fried frailty phenotype criteria (18, 19), which included slowness (usual gait speed <1.0 m/s) (6, 18, 20, 21); weakness (grip strength < 26 kg for men and < 18 kg for women) (6, 18, 20, 21); exhaustion (“no” response to the question, “Do you feel full of energy?” and a score of ≥5/15 on the Geriatric Depression Scale, short version) (18, 22); low physical activity (response of “less than once a day” to the question, “How often do you usually go outdoors?” (6, 18, 20)), and weight loss (responses of “yes” to the question, “Have you lost 2–3 kg or more in the past 6 months? (from 2007–2015)” and “Have you lost ≥ 3 kg in the past 6 months? (from 2016–2019)”) (6, 18, 20). Gait speed was measured over a straight 11 m walkway marked with tape at 3 m and 8 m. Using a stopwatch, well-trained examiners assessed the time required to walk 5 m at a natural speed and calculated the usual gait speed. Handgrip strength was measured twice in the dominant hand: the participant squeezed a Smedley-type handgrip dynamometer (Yagami Co., Tokyo, Japan) as hard as possible, and the higher of the two measured values was included in the analysis. The frailty score ranged from 0–5 (0 = robust, 1 or 2 = prefrail, and 3–5 = frail).
Demographic and health characteristics
We assessed the following potential associated factors for frailty trajectories concurrently at the end of follow-up for frailty assessment. For example, for individuals who underwent frailty assessment 2 times during the follow-up period, the potential associated factors data collected at second time were used. Variables were sex (14), age (14), smoking status (23), alcohol drinking status (24), dietary variety score (25), chronic diseases (26) (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, cerebrovascular disease, heart disease, and bone and joint disease), body mass index (BMI) (14), obesity (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2) (14), limb skeletal muscle mass (27), sarcopenia (27), hospitalization during the past year (28), albumin levels (14), hemoglobin levels (29), and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score (14). The dietary variety score comprises 10 food-based components, including meat, fish/shellfish, eggs, milk, soybean products, green/yellow vegetables, potatoes, fruit, seaweed, and fats/oils (30), which constitute a large proportion of daily-life main and side dishes in Japanese people. Regarding chronic diseases, cerebrovascular diseases included cerebral infarction, cerebral hemorrhage, and subarachnoid hemorrhage. Heart diseases included angina, myocardial infarction, and arrhythmia. Bone and joint diseases included arthritis of the knee and hip joints. For each of these conditions, participants were asked if they had received a physician’s diagnosis or medical treatment (yes or no). Limb skeletal muscle mass was measured in the arms and legs through direct segmental multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (InBody 720 analyzer; InBody Co., Ltd., Seoul, Korea (31)) and divided by the height squared (m2). Sarcopenia was assessed based on the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia (AWGS) 2019 criteria (32), with cutoff values for appendicular lean mass of <7.0 kg/m2 for men and <5.7 kg/m2 for women. Non-fasting blood samples were collected using standard procedures, followed by analysis of albumin and hemoglobin levels at Sanaikai Clinic, which is regularly monitored by several domestic authorities (33). The MMSE assesses orientation, memory, concentration, language, and praxis based on 11 items scored from 0–30, with lower scores indicating poorer global cognitive ability (34). The MMSE was administered by well-trained investigators (35).
Statistical analysis
First, we identified trajectory patterns in frailty scores calculated between the ages of 65 and 90 years using latent class trajectory models in PROC TRAJ (SAS Institute, Inc.) (36, 37), with each latent class comprising individuals who follow an approximately homogeneous growth trajectory and individual trajectory can be estimated despite prospective missing values. Cubic trajectory models were fitted to a fixed number of latent classes. Moreover, the posterior probabilities for class assignment were calculated for each individual. Model selection for the number of trajectory groups and functional form was based on the following criteria: Bayesian information criterion for the models, precision of group proportion, interpretability of the clinical trajectory, and average posterior probability of group assignment (37–38). Subsequently, we performed among-group comparisons of demographic and health characteristics at the end of follow-up using the χ2 test or analysis of variance, with the results presented as proportions, mean values, and standard deviations. Finally, multinomial logistic regression analysis was used to examine the association between health characteristics and frailty trajectory. The dependent variable was the frailty trajectory group and the independent variables were health characteristics at the end of follow-up, with the lowest trajectory pattern used as reference group. All multinomial logistic regression analyses were performed after adjusting for age and sex. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS (version 25.0; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) and SAS (version 9.4; SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).
Results
The mean (standard deviation) age of participants was 71.1 (6.2) years, and 44.5% were women. Among participants, 17.6% and 25.3% were current and past smokers, respectively, while 40.5% and 19.3% were current and past alcohol consumers, respectively. The mean dietary variety score was 3.8 (2.5). Among participants, 38.6% had hypertension, 11.1% had diabetes mellitus, 4.9% had cerebrovascular disease, 10.1% had heart disease, 10.2% had bone and joint diseases, and 8.7% had been hospitalized within the past year. Average BMI, limb skeletal muscle mass, albumin level, hemoglobin level, and MMSE score was 23.1 (3.2) kg/m2, 16.4 (4.0) kg/m2, 4.20 (0.25) g/dL, 14.01 (1.36) g/dL, and 27.5 (2.5), respectively.
We identified five trajectory patterns: robust (Group 1, 10.5%), late-onset frailty (Group 2, 16.1%), middle-onset frailty (Group 3, 25.6% and Group 4, 35.2%), and early-onset frailty (Group 5, 12.7%) (Figure 2). Cubic trajectory models with 5 groups showed small BIC value, appropriate SE, the posterior probability, and interpretability of the clinical trajectory (Supplemental Table 1). The robust group (Group 1) was consistently robust until the age of 90 years. The late-onset frailty group (Group 2) comprised individuals who became prefrail after the age of 80 years. The middle-onset frailty group (Groups 3 and 4) became pre-frail after the late 70s, but not frailty even at age of 90. Although Group 3 had lower frailty scores at age 65 than Group 4, they showed rapid progression of frailty after the age of 70 years. Group 3 had higher score than Group 4 after the late 70 years old. The early-onset frailty group (Group 5) comprised individuals who were already pre-frail at the age of 65 years, and their frailty score gradually progressed to frail status around the age of 85 years.
Table 1 shows the proportions and mean values of demographic and health characteristics at the end of follow-up. Participants in the early-onset frailty group (Group 5) were more likely to be current smokers and/or past alcohol consumers as well as to have cerebrovascular disease, bone and joint disease, sarcopenia, and hospitalization during the past year compared with those in other groups. Additionally, participants in the early-onset frailty group (Group 5) were less likely to be women and current alcohol consumers, and also less likely to have favorable dietary variety scores, limb skeletal muscle mass, albumin levels, hemoglobin levels, and MMSE scores. Compared with participants in the robust group (Group 1), those in middle-onset frailty group (Groups 3 and 4) were more likely to have current smoking habits, heart disease, bone and joint disease, hospitalization during the past year, lower dietary variety scores, and lower MMSE scores. Further, compared with Group 1, Group 2 tended to have higher proportions of participants with diabetes mellitus, heart disease, and bone and joint diseases.
Table 2 shows the age- and sex-adjusted odds ratios of health characteristics for each frailty trajectory compared with the robust group (Group 1). The early-onset frailty group (Group 5) showed significantly higher odds ratios for current smoking, sarcopenia, and hospitalization during the past year, as well as non-significantly higher odds ratios for cerebrovascular disease and bone and joint diseases. In contrast, they showed significantly lower odds ratios for current alcohol consumption, dietary variety score, limb skeletal muscle mass, albumin levels, hemoglobin levels, and MMSE score. Results of multinomial logistic regression analysis for the middle-onset frailty group (Group 3 and Group 4) largely overlapped those in early-onset frailty group, although ORs for poor dietary variety and sarcopenia were not significant in Group 3. Of interest, the late-onset frailty group (Group 2) showed high odds ratios for heart disease and bone and joint diseases.
Discussion
This study identified various factors associated with frailty trajectories (early-, middle-, and late-onset frailty), including cerebrovascular disease, poor nutrition, sarcopenia, low cognitive function, smoking, heart disease, bone and joint disease, and recent hospitalization. Seven associated factors for early-onset frailty were identified, namely cerebrovascular disease, heart disease, bone and joint disease, poor nutrition, sarcopenia, low cognitive function, and smoking. This evidence is consistent with the findings of the Whitehall II study, which indicated that risk factors at age 50 years for subsequent frailty included hypertension, cardiovascular disease, current smoking, and poor nutrition (39). Further, we revealed that associated factors largely overlapped between middle-onset and early-onset frailty groups, and included poor nutrition, sarcopenia, low cognitive function, smoking, heart disease, and bone and joint diseases. Among middle-onset frailty groups, it seems that poor nutrition and sarcopenia accelerate the onset of frailty progression. In contrast, the only associated factors for late-onset frailty were heart disease and bone and joint diseases.
The Women’s Health Initiative Observational Study reported that coronary heart disease, stroke, diabetes mellitus, and arthritis were significantly related to incident frailty among women aged 65–79 years (40). The Whitehall II study reported that the cardiovascular disease risk score was associated with the risk of future frailty occurrence among patients aged 45–69 years (41). Additionally, frailty trajectories have been reported to be associated with several risk and protective factors, including Alzheimer’s disease, diabetes, injury, osteoporotic fractures, increased physical activity, and social support (42). Other risk factors for frailty development include poor nutrition, sarcopenia, low cognitive function, and smoking (14, 15, 23, 25, 27, 43). However, the association of these factors with frailty progression by age at frailty onset remains unclear. To our knowledge, this is the first study to identify associated factors for early-, middle-, and late-onset frailty.
Based on the present evidence, we propose effective population-based frailty prevention strategies in each age group in Figure 3. First, population-based interventions from middle age to youngest-old for lifestyle-related diseases, including stroke and its risk factors such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, smoking, heart disease, bone and joint disease, poor nutrition, sarcopenia, and low cognitive function, are important to prevent early-onset frailty. Second, population-based strategies from middle age to middle-old targeting poor nutrition, sarcopenia, low cognitive function, smoking, heart disease, and bone and joint diseases are necessary to protect against middle-onset frailty. Third, population-based approaches from middle age to oldest-old targeting heart, bone, and joint diseases should be conducted to prevent late-onset frailty. Future community-based intervention studies are needed to verify the effectiveness of these population-based frailty prevention strategies.
This study has several strengths. First, we obtained longitudinal and repeated-measures data of community-dwelling older adults, which allowed the use of a group-based semiparametric mixture model to yield potential trajectories in frailty score for up to 13-time points. Second, we included a wide range of variables, which allowed a comprehensive examination of the potential risk factors for frailty trajectories. However, this study also has several limitations. First, we did not include some variables due to limited data, including education level, household income, neighborhood, living arrangements, and immune-endocrine biomarkers (44). Second, given the small size of each trajectory group, the odds ratio of cerebrovascular disease in Group 5, as well as the odd ratios of heart disease and bone and joint disease in Group 2, might not have reached statistical significance. Third, we only included individuals who underwent health checkups in a rural Japanese town. The rate of participation in health checkups in this town was 50–60% of the census population. In Japan, most patients who receive treatment for chronic diseases from their primary care physician do not undergo community-based health checkups. Therefore, the proportions of each trajectory group might not represent the general population, with potential underestimation and overestimation of early-onset and late-onset frailty. Fourth, as for frailty criteria for the exhaustion, unfortunately, we did not have commonly used indexes, e.g. by using the Center for Epidemiologic Studies depression scale (19). Thus, exhaustion was defined by using the Geriatric Depression Scale-15 including self-reported exhaustion. Finally, we assessed the following potential associated factors for frailty trajectories at the end of follow-up by using multinomial logistic regression analysis. Further study is needed to consider potential changes in wide range of health characteristics during the follow-up period and to determine the clinical impact and utility of distinguishing between trajectory groups.
In conclusion, this 13-years longitudinal study among community-dwelling older Japanese identified five trajectory patterns of frailty and seven associated factors for frailty trajectory, including cerebrovascular disease, heart disease, bone and joint disease, poor nutrition, sarcopenia, low cognitive function, and smoking. We propose effective population-based frailty prevention strategies in each age group: specifically, population-based interventions for lifestyle-related diseases should be covered from middle age to youngest-old; strategies targeting poor nutrition, sarcopenia, low cognitive function, smoking, heart disease, and bone and joint diseases are important for middle age to middle-old; and approaches targeting heart, bone, and joint diseases should be conducted from middle age to oldest-old. As Japan has one of the longest life expectancies in the world, the present findings may contribute to effective frailty prevention strategies to extend healthy life expectancy in aging, aged, and super-aged communities.
References
Clegg A, Young J, Iliffe S, Rikkert MO, Rockwood K. Frailty in elderly people. Lancet (London, England). 2013 Mar 2;381(9868):752–62. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(12)62167-9
Kojima G, Taniguchi Y, Iliffe S, Walters K. Frailty as a Predictor of Alzheimer Disease, Vascular Dementia, and All Dementia Among Community-Dwelling Older People: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association. 2016 Oct 1;17(10):881–8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2016.05.013
Shinkai S, Watanabe N, Yoshida H, Fujiwara Y, Amano H, Lee S, et al. [Research on screening for frailty: development of «the Kaigo-Yobo Checklist»]. [Nihon koshu eisei zasshi] Japanese journal of public health. 2010 May;57(5):345–54. doi: https://doi.org/10.11236/jph.57.5_345
Chang SF, Lin PL. Frail phenotype and mortality prediction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. International journal of nursing studies. 2015 Aug;52(8):1362–74. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.04.005
Vermeiren S, Vella-Azzopardi R, Beckwée D, Habbig AK, Scafoglieri A, Jansen B, et al. Frailty and the Prediction of Negative Health Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association. 2016 Dec 1;17(12):1163.e1–.e17. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2016.09.010
Kitamura A, Shinkai S, Taniguchi Y, Amano H, Seino S, Yokoyama Y, et al. [Impact of frailty and metabolic syndrome on the incidence of loss of independence in community-dwelling older Japanese: the Kusatsu-town study]. [Nihon koshu eisei zasshi] Japanese journal of public health. 2017;64(10):593–606. doi: https://doi.org/10.11236/jph.64.10_593
Kojima G. Frailty Defined by FRAIL Scale as a Predictor of Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association. 2018 Jun;19(6):480–3. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2018.04.006
Kojima G, Taniguchi Y, Iliffe S, Jivraj S, Walters K. Transitions between frailty states among community-dwelling older people: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ageing research reviews. 2019 Mar;50:81–8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2019.01.010
Ng TP, Feng L, Nyunt MS, Feng L, Niti M, Tan BY, et al. Nutritional, Physical, Cognitive, and Combination Interventions and Frailty Reversal Among Older Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial. The American journal of medicine. 2015 Nov;128(11):1225–36.e1. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2015.06.017
Kim H, Suzuki T, Kim M, Kojima N, Ota N, Shimotoyodome A, et al. Effects of exercise and milk fat globule membrane (MFGM) supplementation on body composition, physical function, and hematological parameters in community-dwelling frail Japanese women: a randomized double blind, placebo-controlled, follow-up trial. PloS one. 2015;10(2):e0116256. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116256
Chan DC, Tsou HH, Yang RS, Tsauo JY, Chen CY, Hsiung CA, et al. A pilot randomized controlled trial to improve geriatric frailty. BMC geriatrics. 2012 Sep 25;12:58. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-12-58
Seino S, Nishi M, Murayama H, Narita M, Yokoyama Y, Nofuji Y, et al. Effects of a multifactorial intervention comprising resistance exercise, nutritional and psychosocial programs on frailty and functional health in community-dwelling older adults: A randomized, controlled, cross-over trial. Geriatrics & gerontology international. 2017;17(11):2034–45. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.13016
Serra-Prat M, Sist X, Domenich R, Jurado L, Saiz A, Roces A, et al. Effectiveness of an intervention to prevent frailty in pre-frail community-dwelling older people consulting in primary care: a randomised controlled trial. Age and ageing. 2017 May 1;46(3):401–7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afw242
Feng Z, Lugtenberg M, Franse C, Fang X, Hu S, Jin C, et al. Risk factors and protective factors associated with incident or increase of frailty among community-dwelling older adults: A systematic review of longitudinal studies. PloS one. 2017;12(6):e0178383. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178383
Welstead M, Jenkins ND, Russ TC, Luciano M, Muniz-Terrera G. A Systematic Review of Frailty Trajectories: Their Shape and Influencing Factors. The Gerontologist. 2020;61(8):e463–e75. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaa061.
Shinkai S, Yoshida H, Taniguchi Y, Murayama H, Nishi M, Amano H, et al. Public health approach to preventing frailty in the community and its effect on healthy aging in Japan. Geriatrics & gerontology international. 2016 Mar;16Suppl 1:87–97. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.12726
Kitamura A, Seino S, Abe T, Nofuji Y, Yokoyama Y, Amano H, et al. Sarcopenia: prevalence, associated factors, and the risk of mortality and disability in Japanese older adults. Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle. 2020 Nov 25. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jcsm.12651
Taniguchi Y, Kitamura A, Abe T, Kojima G, Shinozaki T, Seino S, et al. Associations of aging trajectories for an index of frailty score with mortality and medical and long-term care costs among older Japanese undergoing health checkups. Geriatrics & gerontology international. 2020;20(11):1072–8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.14049.
Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, Newman AB, Hirsch C, Gottdiener J, et al. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001 Mar;56(3):M146–56. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/56.3.m146
Kitamura A, Taniguchi Y, Seino S, Yokoyama Y, Amano H, Fujiwara Y, et al. Combined effect of diabetes and frailty on mortality and incident disability in older Japanese adults. Geriatrics & gerontology international. 2019 May;19(5):423–8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.13637
Yuki A, Otsuka R, Tange C, Nishita Y, Tomida M, Ando F, et al. Epidemiology of frailty in elderly Japanese. The Journal of Physical Fitness and Sports Medicine. 2016;5(4):301–7. doi: https://doi.org/10.7600/jpfsm.5.301
Veronese N, Stubbs B, Fontana L, Trevisan C, Bolzetta F, De Rui M, et al. Frailty Is Associated with an Increased Risk of Incident Type 2 Diabetes in the Elderly. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association. 2016 Oct 1;17(10):902–7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2016.04.021
Kojima G, Iliffe S, Walters K. Smoking as a predictor of frailty: a systematic review. BMC geriatrics. 2015 2015/10/22;15(1):131. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-015-0134-9
Kojima G, Iliffe S, Liljas A, Walters K. Non-linear association between alcohol and incident frailty among community-dwelling older people: A dose-response meta-analysis. BioScience Trends. 2017;11(5):600–2. doi: https://doi.org/10.5582/bst.2017.01237
Yokoyama Y, Nishi M, Murayama H, Amano H, Taniguchi Y, Nofuji Y, et al. Association of Dietary Variety with Body Composition and Physical Function in Community-dwelling Elderly Japanese. The journal of nutrition, health & aging. 2016;20(7):691–6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-015-0632-7
Weiss CO. Frailty and chronic diseases in older adults. Clin Geriatr Med. 2011 Feb;27(1):39–52. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cger.2010.08.003
Bernabei R, Martone AM, Vetrano DL, Calvani R, Landi F, Marzetti E. Frailty, Physical Frailty, Sarcopenia: A New Conceptual Model. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2014;203:78–84.
Marchiori GF, Dos Santos Tavares DM, Martins SPV, Dias CC, Fernandes L. Frailty syndrome among older adults after hospitalization: A structural equation modeling analysis. Appl Nurs Res. 2022 Oct;67:151601. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnr.2022.151601
Palmer K, Vetrano DL, Marengoni A, Tummolo AM, Villani ER, Acampora N, et al. The Relationship between Anaemia and Frailty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies. The journal of nutrition, health & aging. 2018;22(8):965–74. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-018-1049-x
Kumagai S, Watanabe S, Shibata H, Amano H, Fujiwara Y, Shinkai S, et al. [Effects of dietary variety on declines in high-level functional capacity in elderly people living in a community]. [Nihon koshu eisei zasshi] Japanese journal of public health. 2003 Dec;50(12):1117–24.
Kim M, Shinkai S, Murayama H, Mori S. Comparison of segmental multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for the assessment of body composition in a community-dwelling older population. Geriatrics & gerontology international. 2015;15(8):1013–22. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.12384
Bhasin S, Travison TG, Manini TM, Patel S, Pencina KM, Fielding RA, et al. Sarcopenia Definition: The Position Statements of the Sarcopenia Definition and Outcomes Consortium. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Jul;68(7):1410–8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.16372
Taniguchi Y, Kitamura A, Kaito S, Yokoyama Y, Yokota I, Shinozaki T, et al. Albumin and Hemoglobin Trajectories and Incident Disabling Dementia in Community-Dwelling Older Japanese. Dementia and geriatric cognitive disorders. 2019 Jul 17:1–10. doi: https://doi.org/10.1159/000499837
Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. «Mini-mental state». A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of psychiatric research. 1975 Nov;12(3):189–98.
Taniguchi Y, Kitamura A, Murayama H, Amano H, Shinozaki T, Yokota I, et al. Mini-Mental State Examination score trajectories and incident disabling dementia among community-dwelling older Japanese adults. Geriatrics & gerontology international. 2017 Nov;17(11):1928–35. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.12996
Jones B, Nagin D, Roeder K. A SAS procedure based on mixture modelling for estimating developmental trajectories. Social Methods Res. 2001;29:374–93. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124101029003005
Nagin DS, Jones BL, Passos VL, Tremblay RE. Group-based multi-trajectory modeling. Statistical methods in medical research. 2018 Jul;27(7):2015–23. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0962280216673085
Taniguchi Y, Yamazaki S, Nakayama SF, Sekiyama M, Michikawa T, Isobe T, et al. Maternal Metals Exposure and Infant Weight Trajectory: The Japan Environment and Children’s Study (JECS). Environmental health perspectives. 2022 Dec;130(12):127005. doi: https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp10321
Brunner EJ, Shipley MJ, Ahmadi-Abhari S, Valencia Hernandez C, Abell JG, Singh-Manoux A, et al. Midlife contributors to socioeconomic differences in frailty during later life: a prospective cohort study. The Lancet Public health. 2018 Jul;3(7):e313–e22. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(18)30079-3
Woods NF, LaCroix AZ, Gray SL, Aragaki A, Cochrane BB, Brunner RL, et al. Frailty: emergence and consequences in women aged 65 and older in the Women’s Health Initiative Observational Study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Aug;53(8):1321–30. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53405.x
Bouillon K, Batty GD, Hamer M, Sabia S, Shipley MJ, Britton A, et al. Cardiovascular disease risk scores in identifying future frailty: the Whitehall II prospective cohort study. Heart. 2013 May;99(10):737–42. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2012-302922
Zaslavsky O, Walker RL, Crane PK, Gray SL, Larson EB. Glucose Levels and Risk of Frailty. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2016 Sep;71(9):1223–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glw024
Lorenzo-López L, Maseda A, de Labra C, Regueiro-Folgueira L, Rodríguez-Villamil JL, Millán-Calenti JC. Nutritional determinants of frailty in older adults: A systematic review. BMC geriatrics. 2017 2017/05/15;17(1):108. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-017-0496-2
Baylis D, Bartlett DB, Syddall HE, Ntani G, Gale CR, Cooper C, et al. Immune-endocrine biomarkers as predictors of frailty and mortality: a 10-year longitudinal study in community-dwelling older people. Age (Dordr). 2013 2013/06//;35(3):963–71. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11357-012-9396-8
Acknowledgements
We thank the staff members of the Public Health Center and town office of Kusatsu and our colleagues in the Research Team for Social Participation and Community Health, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology (TMIG).
Funding
Funding: This work was supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B) (Grant Numbers JP20390190, JP21390212, JP24390173, JP26310111, 17H04140, and 20H03953) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology, Japan, and Research Funding for Longevity Sciences from the National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology (Grant Number 29–42), Japan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Author Contributions: AK and YT: study concept and design, data analysis and interpretation, and drafting of the manuscript. TH, KF, TA, YN, SS, YY, and YF: Data acquisition and critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content. SS: Study concept and coordination, data acquisition, and data interpretation. All the authors approved the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no potential conflicts of interest related to this research.
Ethical standards: The present study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology.
Additional information
How to cite this article: Y. Taniguchi, A. Kitamura, T. Hata, et al. Frailty Trajectories and Its Associated Factors in Japanese Older Adults. J Frailty Aging 2024; https://doi.org/10.14283/jfa.2024.51
Electronic Supplementary Material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Taniguchi, Y., Kitamura, A., Hata, T. et al. Frailty Trajectories and Its Associated Factors in Japanese Older Adults. J Frailty Aging 13, 233–239 (2024). https://doi.org/10.14283/jfa.2024.51
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14283/jfa.2024.51