Erratum
After publication of this work [1], we noted that we inadvertently failed to include the complete list of all coauthors and that sample sizes of some of the trials listed in Table two were incorrect.
The full list of authors has now been added and includes the names of all authors within the i-WIP Collaborative Network. The Authors’ contributions and competing interests section modified accordingly. We are publishing this erratum to update the author list, which is as follows:
Anneloes E Ruifrok, Ewelina Rogozinska, Mireille NM van Poppel, Girish Rayanagoudar, Sally Kerry, Christianne JM de Groot, SeonAe Yeo, Emma Molyneaux, Fionnuala McAuliffe, Lucilla Poston, Tracy Roberts, Richard D Riley, Arri Coomarasamy, Khalid Khan, Ben Willem Mol, Ruben Barakat Carballo, Maria Perales, Annick Bogaerts, Jose G Cecatti, Fernanda Surita, Jodie Dodd, Julie Owens, Nermeen El Beltagy, Roland Devlieger, Helena Teede, Cheryce Harrison, Lene Haakstad, Garry X Shen, Alexis Shub, Narges Motahari, Janette Khoury, Serena Tonstad, Riitta Luoto, Tarja I Kinnunen, Kym Guelfi, Fabio Facchinetti, Elisabetta Petrella, Suzanne Phelan, Tânia T Scudeller, Kathrin Rauh, Hans Hauner, Kristina Renault, Linda Reme Sagedal, Ingvild Vistad, Signe Nilssen Stafne, Siv Mørkved, Kjell Åsmund Salvesen, Christina Vinter, Marcia Vitolo, Arne Astrup, Nina Rica Wium Geiker and Shakila Thangaratinam.
The sample sizes of trials included in Table two have been corrected (Table 1). We are publishing this erratum to update these trial sample sizes, which include Dodd 2014 (n = 2212), Prevedel 2003 (n = 41), Renault 2013 (n = 425), Stafne 2012 (n = 855), Vinter 2011 (n = 360), Walsh 2012 (n = 800) and Wolff 2008 (n = 66).
References
Ruifrok AE, Rogozinska E, van Poppel MNM, Rayanagoudar G, Kerry S, de Groot CJM, et al. Study protocol: differential effects of diet and physical activity based interventions in pregnancy on maternal and fetal outcomes individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis and health economic evaluation. Syst Rev. 2014;3:131.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
AR was involved in the concept and the design of the study and planned and wrote the initial protocol. She also participated in face-to-face meetings and/or teleconferences to discuss protocol, design of the meta-analysis, the choice of outcome measures and analysis strategies. ST was involved in the concept and the design of the study, and planned and wrote the initial protocol. She also participated in face-to-face meetings and/or teleconferences to discuss protocol, design of the meta-analysis, the choice of outcome measures and analysis strategies. RR was involved in the concept and the design of the study, and wrote a significantly part of the protocol. He also participated in face-to-face meetings and/or teleconferences to discuss the protocol, design of the meta-analysis, the choice of outcome measures and analysis strategies. KK was involved in the concept and the design of the study, and contributed significantly to the planning and writing of the protocol. He also participated in face-to-face meetings and/or teleconferences to discuss the protocol, design of the meta-analysis, the choice of outcome measures and analysis strategies. BWM was involved in the concept and the design of the study, and contributed significantly to the planning and writing of the protocol. He also participated in face-to-face meetings and/or teleconferences to discuss the protocol, design of the meta-analysis, the choice of outcome measures and analysis strategies. ER was involved in the concept and the design of the study, and contributed significantly to the planning and writing of the protocol. She also participated in face-to-face meetings and/or teleconferences to discuss the protocol, design of the meta-analysis, the choice of outcome measures and analysis strategies. MvP contributed significantly to the planning and writing of the protocol. She also participated in face-to-face meetings to discuss the protocol, design of the meta-analysis, the choice of outcome measures and analysis strategies. GR contributed significantly to the planning and writing of the protocol. He also participated in face-to-face meetings and/or teleconferences to discuss the protocol, design of the meta-analysis, the choice of outcome measures and analysis strategies. SK contributed significantly to the planning and writing of the protocol. She also participated in face-to-face meetings and/or teleconferences to discuss the protocol, design of the meta-analysis, the choice of outcome measures and analysis strategies. CdG was involved in the concept and the design of the study, and contributed significantly to the planning and writing of the protocol. SY contributed significantly to the planning and writing of the protocol. EM contributed significantly to the planning and writing of the protocol. She also participated in face-to-face meetings and/or teleconferences to discuss the protocol, design of the meta-analysis, the choice of outcome measures and analysis strategies. FM contributed significantly to the planning and writing of the protocol. She also participated in face-to-face meetings and/or teleconferences to discuss the protocol, design of the meta-analysis, the choice of outcome measures and analysis strategies. LP was contributed significantly to the planning and writing of the protocol. She also participated in face-to-face meetings and/or teleconferences to discuss the protocol, design of the meta-analysis, the choice of outcome measures and analysis strategies. TR contributed significantly to the planning and writing of the protocol. She also participated in face-to-face meetings and/or teleconferences to discuss the protocol, design of the meta-analysis, the choice of outcome measures and analysis strategies. AC contributed significantly to the planning and writing of the protocol. He also participated in face-to-face meetings and/or teleconferences to discuss the protocol, design of the meta-analysis, the choice of outcome measures and analysis strategies. All listed authors critically reviewed the subsequent versions of the manuscript and approved the final manuscript.
The online version of the original article can be found under doi:10.1186/2046-4053-3-131.
Rights and permissions
This article is published under an open access license. Please check the 'Copyright Information' section either on this page or in the PDF for details of this license and what re-use is permitted. If your intended use exceeds what is permitted by the license or if you are unable to locate the licence and re-use information, please contact the Rights and Permissions team.
About this article
Cite this article
Ruifrok, A.E., Rogozinska, E., van Poppel, M.N.M. et al. Erratum to: Study protocol: differential effects of diet and physical activity based interventions in pregnancy on maternal and fetal outcomes: individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis and health economic evaluation. Syst Rev 4, 101 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-015-0079-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-015-0079-2