Abstract
A standard critique of attempts to apply entropy-maximizing perspectives to income distribution phenomena in economics is that they do not have appropriate characterizations of individuals making choices, which is at the core of economic modeling. This paper presents a possible bridge between these two seemingly separate universes of discourse. With a specific illustration we show that a conventional model of choice between occupations by individuals can lead to an economic equilibrium which can also be characterized as an outcome which maximizes the entropy of the distribution of individuals across occupations (and hence across incomes). This occupational choice interpretation can provide economic and institutional basis to what has, up to now, often been characterized as somewhat mechanical translation of methods from one discipline to another, without substantive content. The illustrations provided in the paper are a first step in exploring the possible linkages between occupational choice and maximum entropy approaches in modelling income distribution outcomes.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
A. Banerjee, V.M. Yakovenko, New J. Phys. 12, 1 (2010)
A. Basu, N. Chau, G. Fields, R. Kanbur, Oxford Econ. Pap. 71, 119 (2019)
L. Christiaensen, J. De Weerdt, R. Kanbur, J. Econ. Inequality 17, 543 (2019)
S. DellaVigna, J. Econ. Literature 47, 315 (2009)
D.K. Foley, J. Econ. Theory 62, 321 (1994)
D.K. Foley, E. Smith, J. Econ. Dyn. Control 32, 7 (2008)
M. Friedman, J. Political Econ. 4, 277 (1953)
G. Gigerenzer, R. Selten, Bounded Rationality: The Adaptive Toolbox (MIT Press, Cambridge, 2002)
J. Harris, M. Todaro, Am. Econ. Rev. 40, 126 (1970)
D. Kahneman, A. Tversky, Econometrica 47, 263 (1979)
D. Kahneman, Am. Econ. Rev. 93, 1449 (2003)
R. Kanbur, J. Political Econ. 87, 769 (1979)
R.D. McKelvey, T.R. Palfrey, Games Econ. Behav. 10, 6 (1995)
D. Monderer, L.S. Shapley, Games Econ. Behav. 14, 124 (1996)
S.Y. Park, A.K. Bera, J. Income Inequality 16, 461 (2018)
W.H. Sandholm, Population Games and Evolutionary Dynamics (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2010)
E. Scharfenaker, D.K. Foley, Entropy 19, 444 (2017)
H. Simon, A behavioral model of rational choice, in Models of Man, Social and Rational: Mathematical Essays on Rational Human Behavior in a Social Setting (Wiley, New York, 1957)
H. Simon, Org. Sci. 2, 125 (1991)
C.A. Sims, J. Monet. Econ. 50, 665 (2003)
A. Smith, An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (Oxford University Press, New York, 1776)
R.H. Thaler, C.R. Sunstein, Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness (Yale University Press, 2008)
M.P. Todaro, Am. Econ. Rev. 59, 138 (1969)
A. Tversky, D. Kahneman, Science 185, 1124 (1974)
V. Venkatasubramanian, Y. Luo, J. Sethuraman, Physica A 435, 120 (2015)
V. Venkatasubramanian, How Much Inequality is Fair? Mathematical Principles of a Moral, Optimal and Stable Capitalist Society (Columbia University Press, New York, 2017)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
The EPJ Publishers remain neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kanbur, R., Venkatasubramanian, V. Occupational arbitrage equilibrium as an entropy maximizing solution. Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 229, 1661–1673 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2020-900140-9
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2020-900140-9