Abstract
We present the first study on the quantity and diversity of the mycobiota in bottom sediments of the Chukchi Sea. During implementation of the RUSALCA-2012 program, 22 samples of bottom sediments from depths of 44–110 m were collected in late August–early September 2012. Fungi were isolated on agarized media (salinity 35 psu, temperature 6°C). Species identification was performed by morphological-cultural and molecular-genetic methods based on the nucleotide sequences of ITS1-ITS2 rDNA. A total of 128 colonies of mycelial fungi were isolated; 0 to 22 propagules were obtained from each 1 cm3 sample. The overall diversity was represented by 48 morphotypes belonging to 32 genera in 15 orders of ascomycetes and basidiomycetes. Ascomycetes predominated both in number and diversity. A number of species were found in marine ecosystems for the first time. The taxonomic position of nonsporulating isolates (13% of the total) was established using molecular techniques. Among them, high diversity was observed in the orders Pleosporales and Helotiales (Ascomycota).
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
INTRODUCTION
Marine mycology is developing fairly rapidly; however, fungi of the Arctic seas have been given little attention thus far. More than 30 works presenting the results of studies of fungi in the Arctic seas [27] have been published since the middle of the 19th century. Most investigations were conducted in the European sector of the Arctic. Only three works are known for the seas to the north of Siberia. One work provides data on fungi in water of the Arctic seas, including the Kara and Laptev seas [4]; the other two deal with fungi in bottom sediments of some areas of the Barents and Kara seas [2, 9]. The cultivated mycobiota of bottom sediments of the Arctic seas has a number of characteristic features: a low density of fungal propagules and a large proportion of nonsporiferous cultures, as well as of species of the genera Tolypocladium, Penicillium, and Cladosporium [2, 9, 27]. The taxonomic position of up to 30−40% of sterile isolates is difficult to determine by routine morphological-cultural methods. Their identification requires molecular genetic analysis, which has not been used in studies on the diversity of mycobiota in bottom sediments of the Arctic seas.
The purpose of the present research was to investigate the diversity of mycobiota in bottom sediments of the previously unstudied Chukchi Sea using morphological-cultural and molecular genetic methods of identification.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The material was 22 samples of bottom sediments collected during the period from August 30 to September 13, 2012 in the Chukchi Sea during the cruise of the R/V Professor Khromov within the framework of the RUSALCA-2012 program (Fig. 1). Sampling was carried out at depths of 44 to 110 m in two areas: northeast of Wrangel and Herald islands and in the southern part of the sea closer to the Bering Strait. The sediments studied were silts. The Chukchi Sea is characterized by harsh conditions, relatively small freshwater discharge, and a marked influence of two oceans, that is, the Arctic and Pacific [3, 21].
A 1 cm3 sample from an upper 1-cm layer of bottom sediments was taken three times with a sterile syringe and placed in a sterile paper bag. Bags with samples were dried at room temperature. Inoculation was carried out every 60 days after final collection. For isolation of fungi, all sediment in sample was mixed and 1 cm3 of the sediment from each sample was inoculated by the method of Warcup [10] on a malt–agar medium (total sugar content 0.2%, salinity 35 psu, ampicillin 1 g/L). After two months of incubation at a temperature of 6°C, pure cultures were isolated.
Primary identification was carried out based on morphological and cultural features in pure culture [10]. Apart from the identified cultures, nonsporulating and nonconforming morphotypes were fairly numerous in the samples.
Representatives of all morphotypes that could not be identified based on the morphological and cultural features were used for molecular genetic analysis. DNA was isolated from 40 pure cultures with a Diatom Pro kit (Isogen, Moscow). The polymerase chain reaction of the ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 region was carried out using a ScreenMix kit (Evrogen, Moscow) and the ITS1-F and ITS4 primers (http://lutzonilab. org/nuclear-ribosomal-dna/) on a Verity thermocycler (Applied Biosystems, United States). The amplification products were sequenced in two directions according to the BigDye protocol using an ABI Prism 3500 sequencer (Applied Biosystems, United States). Sequence assembly and alignment, as well as hylogenetic tree construction, were performed using the CodonCod Aligner software package (www.codoncod.org). Sequence identity was determined with the BLAST program (blast.ncbi.nih.gov). Twelve sequences of ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 of isolates that were identified to species were deposited to GenBank under the accession numbers from KP739870 to KP739881. For taxonomic identification of the other sequences, phylogenetic trees based on the ITS1-ITS2 region were constructed in two variants for Ascomycota and Basidiomycota, respectively, using the MUSCLE [14] and statistically supported by the neighbor-joining method [15] in the MEGA 6.0 program [31, 32].
RESULTS
Number of Isolated Fungi
A total of 128 colonies of mycelial fungi were isolated (Table 1). We obtained from 0 to 22 propagules from a sample; most samples yielded no more than 10 propagules and several samples yielded one propagule each.
Morphological Diversity
According to morphological features, 48 morphotypes were distinguished (Table 1). Among them, 17 were identified: most species (16) were from the anamorphic ascomycete genera Penicillium, Cladosporium, Tolypocladium, Aspergillus, Fusicolla, Pseudogymnoascus, Lecanicillium, and Trichoderma; only one species, Pseudeurotium hygrophilum, produced telomorphic sporulating structures. Seventy-two isolates belonged to morphotypes that were identified by this method. The genus Penicillium was the most frequent and abundant (44 colonies in 19 samples). P. glabrum (21 colonies in 10 samples), P. aurantiogriseum (13 colonies in 9 samples), and P. nalgiovense (6 colonies in 4 samples) were more frequent than others. For species of the genus Cladosporium (C. cladosporioides and C. macrocarpum), we isolated 12 colonies in six samples, while for Aspergillusflavus we isolated 8 colonies in three samples. Other species were found less frequently and 11 of them were only encountered as single colonies in some samples.
The remaining 56 isolates were assigned to 31 unidentified morphotypes (Table 1). Of these, 16 isolates were sterile, 6 isolates had teleomorphic structures of ascomycetes, 2 were anamorphic picnidial sporulating, and 7 had structures resembling the hyphomycete-type anamorphs. Despite the fact that the number of unidentified isolates was lower, their morphological diversity was higher than that of known species.
Molecular Identification and Taxonomic Diversity
Using molecular genetic methods, we identified 40 cultures that were referred to 31 doubtful morphotypes. For species-level identification, GenBank data were only available for 14 morphotypes (Figs. 2, 3). Most of the cultures that were identified to species, except the Pleosporales ascomycete Nematostoma parasiticum (Herpotrichia parasitica) and the polypore basidiomycete Bjerkandera adusta, had any spore-bearing structures (Table 1). For 17 morphotypes, only genus- or even order-level identification was available. In some cases, identity was found with phylotypes that were earlier unknown as morphotypes. Isolates that were identified using molecular techniques were mostly represented by single colonies in one to two samples, but sometimes by several colonies in two to three samples. The most frequent were the anamorphic ascomycete Pseudoscopulariopsishibernica (seven colonies in three samples), the basidiomycete B. adusta (five colonies in three samples), Lachnum sp. FR-F3 (five colonies in two samples), as well as two species of the genus Chaetomium (C. globosum and Chaetomium sp. E02) with a total of six colonies in five samples.
DISCUSSION
Number of Isolated Fungi
The number of the obtained fungal colony-forming units approximately corresponded to the data reported for off-shore remote Arctic areas [2, 9]. Closer to the shore, the number of fungal propagules is generally higher [9], as is the case for marine bottom sediments of warmer regions [1, 5–7]. The high number of fungal propagules in the ocean is connected with the proximity to the coastline and the presence of permanent freshwater runoff. Samples for our study were collected far from the coast; the freshwater discharge into the Chukchi Sea is smaller than in the other Arctic seas. Therefore, a low number of fungal propagules was expected. Surprisingly, there was no north–south gradient in the number of fungal propagules. We believed that the southern area of the Chukchi Sea might have a higher diversity of fungi due to the exchange with the Pacific Ocean via the Bering Strait [3, 17]. It is well known that the temperate Pacific seas are rich in fungi [5, 7]. However, the input of material, particularly fungal spores, to the southern area of the Chukchi Sea is probably not as large as was thought. Another explanation may be low survival rates of fungal propagules that were transferred from the south into the harsh Arctic conditions.
Taxonomic Diversity of Mycobiota
On the whole, the picture of mycobiota identified by morphological methods was typical for the bottom sediments of the northern seas [1, 2, 6, 9]. This also applies to the presence of a large number of sterile and ambiguous cultures [27].
We discovered 32 species of fungi using morphological-cultural and molecular methods. The taxonomic structure of the mycobiota consists of species of basidiomycetes (3 orders of one class) and ascomycetes (11 orders of four classes), as well as one group of uncertain taxonomic position. Ascomycetes predominated both in the number of isolates and in the diversity of morphotypes. Species of the order Eurotiales were the most abundant, followed by species of the orders Helotiales and Pleosporales. Moreover, the order Eurotiales was the most diverse; the orders Helotiales and Pleosporales, as well as Hypocreales and Sordariales showed a marked diversity. Using molecular methods, we were able to reveal the high diversity of the Pleosporales and Helotiales, to which a large number of sterile and unidentified isolates were assigned. Helotiales species probably play a significant but underestimated role in Arctic marine ecosystems. They are, as a rule, rare in morphological–cultural studies; however, their relatively high taxonomic diversity and number was demonstrated using molecular methods [27, 36]. Members of the division Basidiomycota, which were only revealed by molecular methods, are a minor component of the total species complex.
Autecology of the Isolated Fungi
All the fungi found in the present study can be divided into two large groups: common species to various marine habitats, which are mentioned in numerous publications on marine mycobiota, as well as unusual “guests” that were found in the ocean for the first time. The first group mainly includes abundantly sporulating anamorphs of ascomycetes identified based on morphological features. These all are typical inhabitants of soils and other substrates [13] and are also frequently encountered in marine habitats [1, 4–7, 9]; some of them were identified by molecular methods [25, 27]. Interestingly, most of these fungi do not generally occur in cold regions; they might be transferred via a current from the Pacific Ocean rather than via river runoff.
The second group of fungi were mainly sterile isolates and were identified by molecular methods (Table 2). Information on most of them is scarce, and the geographic distribution is wide and ambiguous; some were previously known only as phylotypes from molecular studies. Many of these fungi are xylotrophs, parasites, or endophytes associated with higher plants (Table 2). It may be the remains of plants (from wood fragments to microscopic pieces of grass and leaves) that provide the opportunity for these fungi to travel long distances through the Pacific Ocean from the Antarctic and Australia to the Arctic. The Pacific Ocean is the most likely source of these interesting species. Currently, too little information is available on the diversity of mycobiota in different geographic localities, and there are many isolates that do not correspond to any of the described species; therefore, the ranges of the fungi we found seem to be disjunct.
Thus, the mycobiota in bottom sediments of the harsh Chukchi Sea demonstrates similar features to those of the previously studied Arctic seas. These are the extremely low number of fungal propagules and the abundance of species of the genus Penicillium and nonsporulating isolates. Using molecular genetic methods, we were able to determine the systematic position of nonsporulating and other ambiguous cultures, which substantially expands the understanding of the taxonomic structure of the studied mycobiota. In particular, members of Basidiomycota, as well as Pleosporales and Helotiales of Ascomycota were revealed. Remarkably, a noticeable part of the identified fungi are known from various localities from the Antarctic and Australia to China and Japan but were not known from the Arctic. Hence, it can be supposed that the current from the Pacific Ocean influences the mycobiota of the Arctic seas, increasing its species richness. Some of the transferred species can survive and possibly propagate under the Arctic conditions.
REFERENCES
Bubnova, E.N., Fungi in sediments of the Kandalaksha Bay (White Sea, NW Russia), Mikol. Fitopatol., 2009, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 4–11.
Bubnova, E.N. and Nikitin, D.A., Fungi in bottom sediments of the Barents and Kara seas, Russ. J. Mar. Biol., 2017, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 400−406.
Zenkevich, L.A., Biologiya morei SSSR (Biology of the Seas of the USSR), Moscow: Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1963.
Kirtsideli, I.Yu., Vlasov, D.Yu., Barantsevich, E.P., et al., Distribution of terrigenous microfungi in Arctic seas, Mikol. Fitopatol., 2012, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 306–310.
Pivkin, M.V., Khudyakova, Yu.V., Kuznetsova, T.A., et al., Fungi from aquasoils of coastal waters of the south part of Primorye Territory (the Sea of Japan), Mikol. Fitopatol., 2005, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 50–61.
Sogonov, M.V. and Marfenina, O.E., Characteristics of mycobiota of coastal marshes of Kandalaksha Bay, the White Sea, Vestn. Mosk. Univ., Ser. 16: Biol., 1999, no. 3, pp. 42–47.
Khudiakova, Yu.V., Pivkin, M.V., Kuznetsova, T.A., and Svetashev, V.I., Fungi in sediments of the Sea of Japan and their biologically active metabolites, Microbiology (Moscow), 2000, vol. 69, no. 5, pp. 608−611.
Alves, A., Crous, P.W., Correia, A., and Philips, A.J.L., Morphological and molecular data reveal cryptic speciation in Lasiodiplodia theobromae, Fungal Diversity, 2008, vol. 28, pp. 1–13.
Bubnova, E.N., Fungal diversity in bottom sediments of the Kara Sea, Bot. Mar., 2010, vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 595–600.
Carlile, M.J., Watkinson, S.C., and Gooday, G.W., The Fungi, 2nd ed., San Diego, Calif.: Academic, 2001.
Damm, U., Fourie, P.H., and Crous, P.W., Coniochaeta (Lecythophora), Collophora gen. nov. and Phaeomoniella species associated with wood necroses of Prunus trees, Persoonia, 2010, vol. 24, pp. 60–80.
De Hoog, G.S., Göttlich, E., Platas, G., et al., Evolution, taxonomy and ecology of the genus Thelebolus in Antarctica, Stud. Mycol., 2005, vol. 51, pp. 33–76.
Domsch, K.H., Gams, W., and Anderson, T.-H., Compendium of Soil Fungi, Eching, Ger.: IHW, 1993.
Edgar, R.C., MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput, Nucleic Acids Res., 2004, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 1792–1797.
Felsenstein, J., Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap, Evolution, 1985, vol. 39, pp. 783–791.
Fröhlich-Nowoisky, J., Pickersgill, D.A., Després, V.R., and Pöschl, U., High diversity of fungi in air particulate matter, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2009, vol. 106, no. 31, pp. 12814–12819.
Johansen, S. and Hytteborn, H., A contribution to the discussion of biota dispersal with drift ice and driftwood in the North Atlantic, J. Biogeogr., 2001, vol. 28, pp. 105–115.
Kotiranta, H. and Larsson, K.-H., Sistotrema luteoviride sp. nov. (Cantharellales, Basidiomycota) from Finland, Acta Mycol., 2013, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 219–225.
Kowalski, T. and Andruch, K., Herpotrichia needle browning on Abies alba in the Lesko forest district stands: disease intensity and associated fungi, Phytopathologia, 2010, vol. 55, pp. 21–34.
Leotta, G.A., Paré, J.A., Sigler, L., et al., Thelebolus microsporus mycelial mats in the trachea of wild brown skua (Catharacta antarctica lonnbergi) and South Polar skua (C. maccormicki) carcasses, J. Wildl. Dis., 2002, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 443–447.
Marchenko, N., Russian Arctic Seas: Navigation Conditions and Accidents, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2012.
Marincowitz, S., Crous, P.W., Groenewald, J.Z., and Wingfield, M.J., Microfungi Occurring on Proteaceae in the Fynbos, CBS Biodiversity Series, vol. 7, Utrecht, Neth.: CBS Fungal Biodiversity Centre, 2008, pp. 1–166.
Menkis, A. and Vasaitis, R., Fungi in roots of nursery grown Pinus sylvestris: ectomycorrhizal colonisation, genetic diversity and spatial distribution, Microb. Ecol., 2011, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 52–63.
Moore, R.T., Index to the Helicosporae: addenda, Mycologia, 1957, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 580–587.
Nagano, Y., Nagahama, T., Hatada, Y., et al., Fungal diversity in deep-sea sediments – the presence of novel fungal groups, Fungal Ecol., 2010, vol. 3, pp. 316–325.
Porras-Alfaro, A., Herrera, J., Natvig, D.O., et al., Diversity and distribution of soil fungal communities in a semiarid grassland, Mycologia, 2011, vol. 103, no. 1, pp. 10–21.
Rämä, T., Hassett, B.T., and Bubnova, E., Arctic marine fungi: from filaments and flagella to operational taxonomic units and beyond, Bot. Mar., 2017, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 433–452.
Rittenour, W.R., Ciaccio, C.E., Barnes, C.S., et al., Internal transcribed spacer rRNA gene sequencing analysis of fungal diversity in Kansas City indoor environments, Environ. Sci.: Processes Impacts, 2014, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 33–43.
Rossman, A.Y., Farr, D.F., Castlebury, L.A., et al., Setomelanomma holmii (Pleosporales, Phaeosphaeriaceae) on living spruce twigs in Europe and North America, Can. J. Bot., 2002, vol. 80, no. 11, pp. 1209–1215.
Sandoval-Denis, M., Gené, J., Sutton, D.A., et al., Redefining Microascus, Scopulariopsis and allied genera, Persoonia, 2016, vol. 36, pp. 1–36.
Tamura, K., Nei, M., and Kumar, S., Prospects for inferring very large phylogenies by using the neighbor-joining method, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2004, vol. 101, pp. 11030–11035.
Tamura, K., Stecher, G., Peterson, D., et al., MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 6.0, Mol. Biol. Evol., 2013, vol. 30, pp. 2725–2729.
Thorn, R.G., Reddy, C.A., Harris, D., and Paul, E.A., Isolation of saprophytic basidiomycetes from soil, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 1996, vol. 62, no. 11, pp. 4288–4292.
Unterseher, M. and Schnittler, M., Species richness analysis and ITS rDNA phylogeny revealed the majority of cultivable foliar endophytes from beech (Fagus sylvatica), Fungal Ecol., 2010, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 366–378.
Wirsel, S.G.R., Leibinger, W., Ernst, M., and Mendgen, K.W., Genetic diversity of fungi closely associated with common reed, New Phytol., 2001, vol. 149, no. 3, pp. 589–598.
Zhang, T., Wang, N.F., Zhang, Y.Q., et al., Diversity and distribution of fungal communities in the marine sediments of Kongsfjorden, Svalbard (High Arctic), Sci. Rep., 2015, vol. 5, no. 14524, pp. 1–11.
Zhao, G.Z., Liu, X.Z., and Wu, W.P., Helicosporous hyphomycetes from China, Fungal Diversity, 2007, vol. 26, pp. 313–524.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors are sincerely grateful to the colleagues who collected material for the study: A. Bosin and A. Kolesnik from the Pacific Oceanological Institute, Far East Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences (Vladivostok), as well as to K. Kosobokova from the Institute of Oceanology, Russian Academy of Sciences (Moscow).
Funding
This research was performed with support from the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project no. 15-04-02722а for morphological identification of cultures and partially for molecular identification and processing) and from the Russian Science Foundation (project no. 14-50-00029 partly for molecular identification and processing).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. This article does not contain any studies involving animals or human participants performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Translated by T. Koznova
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bubnova, E.N., Konovalova, O.P. Fungi in Bottom Sediments of the Chukchi Sea. Russ J Mar Biol 45, 86–95 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063074019020020
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063074019020020