Abstract
Notch is a conserved cell-signaling pathway involved in spermatogenesis regulation. This study firstly evaluated the presence, localization patterns, acquisition origin and relation to acrosome reaction of Notch proteins in bull sperm. Western Blot analysis detected all Notch proteins in ejaculated bull sperm, and immunostaining described their specific sperm localization. Recovery of sperm from different segments showed that Notch proteins have testicular origin (NOTCH1, NOTCH2, DLL4), are sequentially acquired during sperm maturation along epididymal transit (NOTCH3, DLL3, JAGGED1-2), or post-ejaculation (DLL1, NOTCH4). Testis NOTCH2 is ubiquitously expressed in all germ-cell lines, whereas DLL4 is expressed in round and elongated spermatids during the Golgi, Cap, Acrosome and Maturation phases. In vitro spontaneous and induced sperm acrosome reaction induce consistent sperm regional relocation of NOTCH2, DLL4 and JAGGED1, and these relocation patterns are significantly associated to sperm acrosome status. NOTCH2 and JAGGED1 are relocated from the head apical to the post-equatorial regions, whereas DLL4 is lost along with the acrosome, evidencing that sperm spatial redistribution of NOTCH2 and JAGGED1 is linked to acrosome reaction onset, whereas DLL4 loss is linked to AR completion. Overall, results prompt for a relevant Notch role in bull sperm acrosome testicular development, epididymal maturation and acrosome reaction.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
In mammals, following spermatogenesis, sperm cells undergo post-testicular maturation in the epididymis to acquire forward motility and fertilizing ability1,2. This maturation involves extensive remodeling of the sperm membrane3, with relocation of surface proteins4,5, and being other proteins modified, masked, or replaced by proteins of epididymal origin6,7. Epididymosomes, extracellular vesicles released from the epididymal epithelium, are a major vehicle of epididymal protein transfer to maturing sperm8. Additionally, during urethral transit and in the female reproductive tract, sperm cells come into contact with seminal plasma and utero-oviductal proteins, which lead to sperm capacitation9. Sperm acrosome reaction, a late capacitation pre-requisite for sperm-oocyte fusion, is a Ca2+-dependent exocytotic event involving the fusion of sperm acrosomal and plasma membranes10,11. Following acrosome exocytosis, the post-acrosomal segments remain intact, exposing the site for sperm-egg fusion12. Acrosome exocytosis is also accompanied by a translocation of proteins to the equatorial segment. In particular, the plasma membrane of the equatorial segment becomes denser with protein complexes that are redistributed from the apical region13,14. These changes in the equatorial segment of the sperm are essential for the sperm to penetrate the egg and complete fertilization.
The Notch signaling pathway is an evolutionarily conserved mechanism that regulates a broad spectrum of cell fates and developmental processes8,15. In mammals, four receptors (NOTCH1-4) and five ligands (JAGGED1-2; Delta-like1, 3 and 4) are identified16. Notch canonical signaling is activated by biding of a membrane ligand with the transmembrane receptor of a neighboring cell. Notch non-canonical signaling is either dependent or independent of a ligand, acting through cross-talking with Wnt/β-Catenin or other signaling pathways17,18. Notch signaling components were identified in testis germ and Sertoli cells in several mammalian species19,20,21,22,23,24,25, evidencing a regulatory role in the spermatogenic cycle. The team’s previous studies in a mouse model demonstrated the presence of Notch proteins in testis germ, Sertoli and Leydig cells25, the epithelium of the epididymis and the vas deferens, within epididymosomes epididymal sperm cells26. In vivo Notch signaling blocking resulted in apoptosis of germ cells, generation of abnormal spermatozoa, and a significant decrease in the proportion of sperm with progressive forward motility27. Although Notch involvement in spermatogenesis has been subject of several studies, the relationship between Notch proteins and sperm capacitation and acrosome reaction remains unknown. Also, studies mainly addressed lab rodents and humans19,20,21,22,23,24,25, whereas the picture in farm species, namely in bull sperm, is largely fragmental. Novel knowledge on sperm capacitation may pave the way to improvement of assisted reproductive techniques (ART).
The objective of this study was to evaluate the dynamic localization of Notch proteins in bull sperm cells, from their germ cell origin during spermatogenesis, to their epididymal and vas deferens transit, up to ejaculated cells. Additionally, the study evaluated the localization and relocation of Notch proteins during acrosome reaction.
Results
Presence and localization patterns of Notch components in bull ejaculated sperm cells
To firstly assess the presence and localization of Notch components in bull sperm cells, Notch proteins were analyzed by western blot and immunolocalized using antibodies with known bovine reactivity or here tested for cross-reactivity (Supplementary Figure S1 and Supplementary Figure S2). The western blot analysis demonstrated the presence of all Notch receptors and ligands in ejaculated bull sperm cells (Fig. 1), whereas the immunostaining evidenced that Notch proteins exhibit specific localization patterns (Fig. 2).
NOTCH1 is mainly present in the post-equatorial head segment and weaker in apical ridge and tail (91% of cells; Fig. 2A), whereas NOTCH2 displays three localization patterns, being present in the apical and post-equatorial head segments (64% of cells), or only in the apical region (17%) or in the post-equatorial regions (14%) (Fig. 2B). Additionally, NOTCH2 is detected in the neck region, midpiece and tail of all stained spermatozoa (Fig. 2B). NOTCH3 is present in the equatorial and neck regions, midpiece and tail (93% of cells) or in the post-equatorial head segment (Fig. 2C). NOTCH4 is present in the head equatorial region (70% of cells) or at head base (23%), and in the tail (Fig. 2D).
Regarding Notch ligands, DLL1 is only present in the tail (95% of cells, Fig. 2E), whereas DLL3 is present in the acrosome region, the midpiece and tail (94% of cells, Fig. 2F). DLL4 immunostaining is detected in the acrosome, neck region and midpiece, and a weak signal in the tail (92% of cells, Fig. 2G). JAGGED1 is present in the acrosome apical region (53% of cells), or in both the apical and post-equatorial regions (44%), and in the neck region, midpiece and tail of all sperm cells (Fig. 2H). JAGGED2 is detected in the post-equatorial head region (95% of cells), with a weak signal in the acrosome ridge (Fig. 2I).
Presence and localization patterns of Notch components in bull sperm cells along the testis, epididymis and vas deferens
To evaluate the local origin of Notch components in bull sperm cells, the immunostaining analysis was conducted in spermatozoa recovered from the testes, epididymis and vas deferens. This analysis revealed that Notch proteins are acquired by bull sperm cells in a sequential specific pattern (Fig. 3; Table 1). NOTCH1, NOTCH2 and DLL4 are first detected in testicular sperm cells (Fig. 3A). NOTCH1 is detected in the head apical region and tail, NOTCH2 in the head apical and post-equatorial regions, midpiece and tail, and DLL4 in the acrosome and neck regions, midpiece and tail. NOTCH1 and DLL4 maintain this pattern along the epididymis and vas deferens, whereas NOTCH2 also acquires a head post-equatorial region localization in the vas deferens. In contrast, NOTCH3, DLL3, JAGGED1 and JAGGED2 are first detected along the sequential epididymis segments (Fig. 3B). DLL3 is first detected in sperm acrosome region in the epididymis head and detected in midpiece and tail in the vas deferens. JAGGED1 is first detected in sperm apical and post-equatorial head regions, midpiece, neck and tail in the epididymis body. NOTCH3 is first detected in sperm equatorial and/or post-equatorial region, sperm midpiece and tail in the tail epididymis. JAGGED2 is first detected in sperm post-equatorial region in the epididymis tail. DLL1 and NOTCH4 are not detected in pre-ejaculated sperm cells. Overall, these results evidence that sperm NOTCH1, NOTCH2 and DLL4 have a testicular origin, NOTCH3, JAGGED1, JAGGED2 and DLL3 are acquired during epididymal transit, and DLL1 and NOTCH4 are acquired from secretions of accessory glands.
Relocalization patterns of Notch proteins during sperm acrosome reaction
Following the detection of the above dynamic localization of Notch proteins, the study proceeded to the evaluation of their potential relocalization during sperm acrosome reaction. This was assessed during both the spontaneous, as well as during the Calcium (Ca2+) Ionophore induced acrosome reaction. Acrosome status was assessed using peanut agglutinin (PNA) and classified as follows: (1) non-reacted (NR), representing an intact acrosome with green fluorescence in whole acrosomal cap; (2) reacting (R), indicating a slightly to severely deformed acrosome with a bright or weak fluorescence signal; and (3) acrosome-reacted (AR), representing an acrosome with a fluorescence signal restricted to the acrosomal outline, to the equatorial segment or with no fluorescent signal at all28 (Supplementary Figure S3). Induction of acrosome reaction significantly decreased the number of NR sperm and increased the number of AR sperm (p < 0.05; Fig. 4).
Receptor NOTCH2 and ligands DLL4 and JAGGED 1 exhibit a relocalization pattern associated with sperm acrosome status. As acrosome reaction progresses, NOTCH2 (Fig. 5) and JAGGED 1 (Fig. 6) are relocated from the head apical (Ap) to the post-equatorial (PE) regions, in both spontaneous and induced acrosome reactions. In NR sperm cells, NOTCH2 and JAGGED1 show Ap + PE localization, while AR sperm cells have only a PE detection. The tail detection pattern remains unchanged during acrosome reaction.
In NR sperm cells, DLL4 is detected in the acrosome, neck region and midpiece. While detection in the neck region and midpiece remains unchanged during acrosome reaction, DLL4 detection in the acrosome region decreases in R sperm, being absent in AR sperm (Fig. 7). These results evidence that the sperm spatial redistribution of NOTCH2 and JAGGED1 is linked to acrosome reaction onset, whereas DLL4 loss is linked to acrosome reaction completion.
Presence and localization patterns of NOTCH2, DLL4 and JAGGED1 in the testis and epididymis
Due to the association between NOTCH2, DLL4 and JAGGED1 detection and the course of sperm acrosome reaction, the study proceeded with the evaluation of expression of these Notch components in the testis (NOTCH2, DLL4) and epididymis (JAGGED1). NOTCH2 is detected in the cytoplasm of all germline cells (Fig. 8A), and despite the cytoplasm loss operated in round and elongated spermatids, its expression is kept in the sperm head at the acrosome region (maturation phase). DLL4 is expressed in spermatocytes, round, and elongated spermatids, both in the cytoplasm and in the developing acrosome. Particularly, expression of DLL4 in the developing acrosome of round and elongated spermatids is mainly observed during the Golgi, Cap, Acrosome and Maturation phases (Fig. 8B). In accordance with the detection pattern in intraluminal spermatozoa, JAGGED1 is not expressed in testicular and epididymis head epithelia, being first expressed in the epididymis body epithelium and its intraluminal spermatozoa (Fig. 8C).
Discussion
This study firstly identified the presence, localization patterns and acquisition origin of Notch proteins in testicular, epididymal, vas deferens and ejaculated bull spermatozoa. The study also evidenced for the first time a relationship between the relocation patterns of sperm Notch proteins and the course of sperm acrosome reaction. Finally, the study characterized the sperm-acquisition tissue localization of Notch proteins related to acrosome reaction.
Western Blot analysis results showed that all Notch proteins are detected in bull ejaculated sperm, and immunocytochemistry analysis revealed that all Notch proteins show sperm specific localization patterns. Sperm protein localization is related with specific cellular functions29. NOTCH2, DLL4 and JAGGED1 show a strong signal on the apical ridge or the acrosome. Other bull sperm proteins displaying similar detection patterns, such as SPACA130 and P25b31 are functionally related to acrosome reaction and sperm-oocyte interaction. NOTCH1-4 and JAGGED1-2 show immunostaining in the sperm head equatorial and/or post-equatorial regions. Proteins located in these regions are often associated with zona-binding and penetration32 and sperm-oocyte fusion33. NOTCH2-4, DLL1-4 and JAGGED1 exhibit immunostaining in the sperm neck, midpiece and/or tail, protein localizations associated with sperm motility, metabolism, and capacitation34,35,36. As example, bull sperm ADCY10 regulates sperm hyperactivation through a signaling cascade between the sperm neck/midpiece, and the tail37, and sperm neck proteins often display immunological functions, probably related to sperm survival in the female genital tract32. These results prompt the potential role of Notch proteins in multiple sperm functions. In fact, sperm proteins are known to play critical roles in sperm motility, capacitation, acrosome reaction and fertilization38.
Proteins may be added to sperm during spermatogenesis, epididymis/vas deferens transit, and following ejaculation through secretions from accessory sexual glands. By recovering sperm cells from these different segments, this study characterized the acquisition origin of sperm Notch proteins. NOTCH1-2 and DLL4 are first detected in testicular spermatozoa, whereas NOTCH3, DLL3 and JAGGED1-2 are first detected during sperm maturation along epididymal transit, and DLL1 and NOTCH4 are only detected in ejaculated sperm, denoting acquisition through secretions of accessory glands39.
Sperm maturation is a conserved mammalian event, and epididymal sperm protein binding is well preserved among species4. As other sperm proteins2,29,31, Notch proteins may also be transferred to spermatozoa through epididymosomes, as evidenced by26 in the mouse. In this latter study, JAGGED1 was detected in epididymosomes in different segments of the epididymal lumen. By this process, Notch proteins may be transferred remotely, sequentially contributing to sperm maturation and competence. This concept is in accordance with results of this study, as Notch proteins are acquired in a sequential form along the transit in the epididymis. In fact, DLL3 is first detected in the epididymis head, JAGGED1 in the epididymis body, and NOTCH3 and JAGGED2 in the epididymis tail. Also, detection in different sperm regions is acquired sequentially along sperm transit, as NOTCH3 and DLL3 are first detected in sperm in the epididymis (tail and head respectively) acquiring staining in the sperm midpiece and tail in the vas deferens. Protein modifications occurring during sperm transit are often related to sperm tail structural stabilization and increased tyrosine phosphorylation of signaling pathway-related proteins40. Acrosome proteins rearranged during epididymal transit may reflect later individual differences among bulls in acrosome stability30.
This study evaluated the detection and relocation patterns of Notch proteins during in vitro spontaneous and induced acrosome reaction. Immunofluorescence analysis revealed that NOTCH2, JAGGED1 and DLL4 undergo clear consistent spatial rearrangements during acrosome reaction. NOTCH2 and JAGGED1 are relocated from the head apical to post-equatorial regions, whereas DLL4 is lost along with the acrosome. The immunostaining also allowed the localization of the above proteins on the sperm cell surface, as described for proteins involved in acrosome reaction. Sperm capacitation involves changes in the distribution of sperm membrane proteins41, and acrosome reaction results in the fusion of the sperm acrosome and plasma membranes5. Upon leaving the testis, sperm plasma membrane contains both membrane-integrated and surface-adsorbed proteins, but during epididymal maturation, surface proteins change their location from one membrane domain to the other7, while others are altered, masked, or replaced by new proteins of epididymal origin8. Therefore, the sperm surface protein localization of NOTCH2, DLL4 and JAGGED1, and their acrosome status-related relocation patterns during acrosome reaction, points to a relevant role in sperm capacitation. In this context, NOTCH2 and JAGGED1 may be involved in acrosome reaction regulation and DLL4 in acrosome stability. Several bull sperm proteins have already been implicated in sperm-oocyte interactions, such as ADAM1-242, IZUMO114 and E-cadherin43, and sperm capacitation results from the interaction of multiple proteins. This requires tiny regulation, and Notch signaling is known for its pivotal role in the regulation of cell-fate and pace of reproductive and developmental events, namely spermatogenesis19,20,21,22,23,24,44,45. In this context, it is noteworthy that all Notch signaling components are present in bull sperm cells. Nevertheless, it's important to highlight that this study used cryopreserved semen, which may have been impacted by cryopreservation-induced changes, such as capacitation-like changes, affecting the sperm protein content and localization patterns. In accordance, Fukuda et al., (2016)14 reported that IZUMO1 aberrantly relocalized to whole equatorial segment or whole acrosomal region in bull cryopreserved spermatozoa with damaged acrosomes, a pattern similar to that found in acrosome-reacted spermatozoa. Therefore, we cannot exclude the hypothesis that NOTCH proteins might exhibit a different abundance and/or localization pattern in fresh semen.
As sperm NOTCH2 and DLL4, which are related to acrosome reaction, have testicular origin, this study evaluated their testis cell expression. NOTCH2 is expressed in the cytoplasm of all germline cells, similarly to results described by25 in the mouse model. The expression of Notch components in germline cells is linked to spermatogenesis regulation, namely spermatogonia fate45, and germline cell fate decisions leading to self-renewal or differentiation24,25,44,45. In bull testis, DLL4 is expressed in the cytoplasm of round and elongated spermatids co-localized with the early-stage acrosome development, also similarly to previous findings in the mouse model25. The cytoplasmic expression is further confirmed by presence of NOTCH2 and DLL4 in the residual bodies of immature spermatozoa. This points to DLL4 involvement in the regulation of acrosome development, likewise SPACA1, a acrosome membrane protein involved in spermatid acrosome maturation during spermiogenesis37,46. Acrosome biogenesis is a crucial phase of spermatid differentiation into a spermatozoon47, and Notch signaling was implicated in acrosome formation from the Golgi complex during spermatid maturation22,44.
In conclusion, all Notch proteins are present as surface proteins in bull ejaculated sperm. These proteins are already expressed in germ-line cells during spermatogenesis (NOTCH2 and DLL4) or are sequentially acquired by sperm during maturation in epididymal transit (NOTCH3, DLL3 and JAGGED1-2) or through accessory glands following ejaculation (DLL1 and NOTCH4). All these proteins show specific sperm localization patterns, and NOTCH2, DLL4 and JAGGED1 show distinct relocation patterns in the course of spontaneous and induced sperm acrosome reaction. Notch, as major highly conserved signaling pathway involved in regulation of spermatogenesis and other reproductive and developmental events, is by results of this study also prompted for a relevant role in bull sperm physiology and acrosome reaction.
Methods
Bull sperm and testicular, epididymal and vas deferens samples
Bull ejaculated sperm samples for the evaluation of the presence and localization patterns of Notch proteins, were selected from cryopreserved semen doses from 4 bulls with proven in vitro and in vivo fertility, stored at the licensed Animal Germplasm Bank of the Reproduction & Development Laboratory. Semen doses were thawed (37 °C, 20 s) and incubated with sperm TALP medium supplemented with pyruvic acid (0.8 mg/mL; P3662, Sigma) and gentamycin (0.1 mg/mL; G1522, Sigma) for 1 h at 39 °C in a 5% CO2 humidified atmosphere. The upper two thirds of the medium column were recovered and centrifuged for 10 min at 200 × g and spermatozoa with high forward motility was recovered from the pellet.
Bull testicular, epididymal and vas deferens intraluminal sperm and tissue samples were recovered postmortem from 4 mature bulls. Reproductive tracts were collected at a local slaughterhouse, transported at 4 °C within 3 h to the laboratory, cleaned with ethanol 70%, and the testes, epididymis and vas deferens individualized. To recover testicular sperm, testes were dissected, tissue infused with 5 mL of saline and gently squeezed, and spermatozoa enriched fluid recovered. To recover epididymal sperm, the epididymis was first divided in its three segments (head, body and tail). Epididymis head spermatozoa were recovered as testicular sperm, whereas epididymis body and tail, and vas deferens spermatozoa were recovered using an intraluminal flushing technique. Recovered intraluminal fluids were centrifuged for 1 min at 300 × g at RT, the supernatant collected and centrifuged for 10 min at 300 × g, and the sperm pellet washed twice in PBS.
To obtain tissue samples, testes, epididymis and vas deferens were cut into sections, fixed in 10% formalin for 24–48 h at room temperature, embedded in paraffin, and 3 μm thick tissue sections used for immunohistochemistry.
Bull ejaculated sperm and tissue protein extraction and SDS-PAGE immunoblotting (Western Blot)
Following swim-up, sperm cell suspensions were centrifuged for 10 min at 400 × g, and 30 × 106 sperm cells lysed in RIPA buffer (RIPA Buffer, cat. 89,901, Thermo Scientific) supplemented with protease inhibitors (A32953, Pierce™, Thermo Scientific) for 30 min in ice, under gentle stirring. Suspensions were then centrifuged (10 min, 16,000 × g, 4 °C) to recover the supernatant (soluble protein fraction), to quantify total protein concentrations using the Bradford method (MB19801, Nzytech). To extract tissue proteins (mouse and bovine liver and heart, from a tissue bank), 20 mg of each tissue was lysed as above, plus a disruption step using TissueLyser (3 cycles of 25HZ, 30 s each), and protein recovery and quantification performed as described above. For SDS-PAGE, 60 µg of total protein was boiled with Laemmli Buffer (M11701, Nzytech), samples run on 4% stacking and 10% separating polyacrylamide gel (Bio-Rad electrophoresis system), and proteins transferred to a PVDF membrane (LC2007, Invitrolon™/Invitrogen™). After blocking with 5% skim milk and 0.05% Tween-20, membranes were incubated with the primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C and incubated with the secondary antibody HRP labeled (Table 1) for 1 h at RT, being the signal detected by the Super Signal™ chemiluminescence substrate (34,580, Thermo Scientific). DLL1 validation western blot the chemiluminescent signal was detected via the use of X-ray films. Otherwise, a digital detection system was use (Chemidoc Image Lab Software XRS + , Bio-Rad).
Immunolocalization of Notch components in bull ejaculated sperm
Following swim-up, motile spermatozoa were cytospin centrifuged (4 min at 1500 rpm), dropped on a slide and air dried for 10 min. After fixation with 1% PFA (paraformaldehyde, 8.18715, Sigma) for 30 min at 4 °C, slides were washed twice with PBS 1 × for 5 min and blocked with 2.5% BSA (bovine serum albumin, A7906, Sigma) and 0.05% Tween-20 (EC-607, National Diagnostics, USA) for 1 h in a humidified dark chamber at room temperature (RT). Slides were then incubated with the primary antibodies (Supplementary Table S4) overnight at 4 °C. The Rabbit control IgG (Supplementary Table S4) was used as a negative control. After washing with PBS 1x, slides were incubated with the secondary antibody (Alexa Fluor™ 594 goat anti-rabbit, ab150080, Abcam) for 30 min at RT, washed and incubated with Peanut Agglutinin (3 µg/mL; Lectin PNA Alexa Fluor™ 488, L21409, Invitrogen™) for 15 min to evaluate acrosome status (non-reacted—NR, reacting—R, acrosome reacted—AR). Slides were then washed and incubated with bisBenzimide H 33,258 (1 µg/mL; b2883, Sigma) for 10 min for nuclear staining, again washed, and mounted with ProLong™Gold antifade mounting medium (P36934, Invitrogen™). Images were acquired in an inverted epifluorescence microscope (Leica, DMR), and analyzed and treated with Adobe Photoshop (CS5 21.1.1). For each Notch protein, 8 fields were acquired per slide and 900 spermatozoa counted.
In vitro sperm capacitation and acrosome reaction
Following swim-up, sperm cells were incubated in TALP medium supplemented with heparin (60 µg/mL; H3393, Sigma), and incubated for 3 h at 39 °C in 5% CO2 for in vitro capacitation. Capacitated sperm cells were then centrifuged at 200 × g for 10 min, the pellet resuspended in TALP medium and divided into two aliquots (2 × 106 spermatozoa/mL). The first aliquot was left untreated to evaluate the spontaneous acrosome reaction, while the second aliquot was incubated with Ca2+ ionophore (0.7 µM; C7522, Sigma) to evaluate the induced acrosome reaction. Both aliquots were then incubated for 1 h at 39 °C in 5% CO2, processed for Immunocytochemistry as described above, using PNA lectin and the anti-Notch primary antibodies. A minimum of 300 spermatozoa per Notch protein and bull were analyzed.
Tissue sections immunohistochemistry (IHC)
Tissue slides were deparaffinized by heating at 56 °C for 5 min and incubation in xylol for 20 min, and rehydrated in serial ethanol solutions (100%, 95%, 70% and H2O final step). Antigen retrieval was performed in a microwave (3 × 5 min) in citrate buffer (10 mM; pH 6.0), and the thereafter blocking step and the remaining IHC protocol, as well as image acquisition, performed as described above.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Data availability
All data supporting the findings of this study are included in this paper and its additional files.
References
Staub, C. & Johnson, L. Review: Spermatogenesis in the bull. Animal 12, s27–s35 (2018).
Caballero, J., Frenette, G. & Sullivan, R. Post testicular sperm maturational changes in the bull: Important role of the epididymosomes and prostasomes. Vet. Med. Int. 2011, 1–13 (2011).
Skerget, S., Rosenow, M. A., Petritis, K. & Karr, T. L. Sperm proteome maturation in the mouse epididymis. PLOS One. 10, e0140650 (2015).
Belleannée, C. et al. Identification of luminal and secreted proteins in bull epididymis. J. Proteom. 74, 59–78 (2011).
Nandi, P., Ghosh, S., Jana, K. & Sen, P. C. Elucidation of the Involvement of p14, a sperm protein during maturation, capacitation and acrosome reaction of caprine spermatozoa. PLoS One 7, e30552 (2012).
Björkgren, I. & Sipilä, P. The impact of epididymal proteins on sperm function. Reproduction 158, R155–R167 (2019).
Eccleston, E. D., White, T. W., Howard, J. B. & Hamilton, D. W. Characterization of a cell surface glycoprotein associated with maturation of rat spermatozoa. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 37, 110–119 (1994).
Zhou, Y. et al. An epididymis-specific secretory protein HongrES1 critically regulates sperm capacitation and male fertility. PLoS One 3, e4106 (2008).
Rodriguez-Martinez, H., Martinez, E. A., Calvete, J. J., Peña Vega, F. J. & Roca, J. Seminal plasma: Relevant for fertility?. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22, 4368 (2021).
Rossato, M. Intracellular calcium store depletion and acrosome reaction in human spermatozoa: Role of calcium and plasma membrane potential. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 7, 119–128 (2001).
Fraser, L. R., Abeydeera, L. R. & Niwa, K. Ca2+—regulating mechanisms that modulate bull sperm capacitation and acrosomal exocytosis as determined by chlortetracycline analysis. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 40, 233–241 (1995).
Wolkowicz, M. J. et al. Equatorial segment protein defines a discrete acrosomal subcompartment persisting throughout acrosomal biogenesis1. Biol. Reprod. 69, 735–745 (2003).
Leung, M. R., Ravi, R. T., Gadella, B. M. & Zeev-Ben-Mordehai, T. Membrane remodeling and matrix dispersal intermediates during mammalian acrosomal exocytosis. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 9, 765673 (2021).
Fukuda, M., Sakase, M., Fukushima, M. & Harayama, H. Changes of IZUMO1 in bull spermatozoa during the maturation, acrosome reaction, and cryopreservation. Theriogenology 86, 2179-2188.e3 (2016).
Artavanis-Tsakonas, S., Rand, M. D. & Lake, R. J. Notch signaling: Cell Fate control and signal integration in development. Sci. New Ser. 284, 770–776 (1999).
Borggrefe, T. & Oswald, F. The Notch signaling pathway: Transcriptional regulation at Notch target genes. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 66, 1631–1646 (2009).
Takam Kamga, P. et al. The role of Notch and Wnt signaling in MSC communication in normal and leukemic bone marrow niche. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 8, 599276 (2021).
Gao, J., Fan, L., Zhao, L. & Su, Y. The interaction of Notch and Wnt signaling pathways in vertebrate regeneration. Cell Regen. 10, 11 (2021).
Garcia, T. X. & Hofmann, M.-C. NOTCH signaling in Sertoli cells regulates gonocyte fate. Cell Cycle 12, 2538–2545 (2013).
Dirami, G., Ravindranath, N., Achi, M. V. & Dym, M. Expression of Notch pathway components in spermatogonia and Sertoli cells of Neonatal Mice. J. Androl. 22, 944–952 (2001).
Hasegawa, K., Okamura, Y. & Saga, Y. Notch signaling in Sertoli cells regulates cyclical gene expression of Hes1 but is dispensable for mouse spermatogenesis. Mol. Cell. Biol. 32, 206–215 (2012).
Hayashi, T. et al. Requirement of Notch 1 and its ligand Jagged 2 expressions for spermatogenesis in rat and human testes. J. Androl. 22, 999–1011 (2001).
Hayashi, T. et al. Expression of the p63 and Notch signaling systems in rat testes during postnatal development: Comparison with their expression levels in the epididymis and vas deferens. J. Androl. 25, 692–698 (2004).
Mori, S., Kadokawa, Y., Hoshinaga, K. & Marunouchi, T. Sequential activation of Notch family receptors during mouse spermatogenesis. Dev. Growth Differ. 45, 7–13 (2003).
Murta, D. et al. Dynamics of Notch pathway expression during mouse testis post-natal development and along the spermatogenic cycle. PLoS ONE 8, e72767 (2013).
Murta, D. et al. Notch signaling in the epididymal epithelium regulates sperm motility and is transferred at a distance within epididymosomes. Andrology 4, 314–327 (2016).
Murta, D. et al. In vivo Notch signaling blockade induces abnormal spermatogenesis in the mouse. PLoS One 9, e113365 (2014).
Harayama, H., Nishijima, K., Murase, T., Sakase, M. & Fukushima, M. Relationship of protein tyrosine phosphorylation state with tolerance to frozen storage and the potential to undergo cyclic AMP-dependent hyperactivation in the spermatozoa of Japanese black bulls. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 77, 910–921 (2010).
Girouard, J., Frenette, G. & Sullivan, R. Compartmentalization of proteins in epididymosomes coordinates the association of epididymal proteins with the different functional structures of Bovine Spermatozoa1. Biol. Reprod. 80, 965–972 (2009).
Arai, M. M. et al. Variation among individual bulls in the distribution of acrosomal tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins in epididymal and ejaculated spermatozoa. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 29, 1297 (2017).
Frenette, G. & Sullivan, R. Prostasome‐like particles are involved in the transfer of P25b from the bovine epididymal fluid to the sperm surface. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 59, 115–121 (2001).
Baldi, E., Luconi, M., Bonaccorsi, L. & Forti, G. Signal transduction pathways in human spermatozoa. J. Reprod. Immunol. 53, 121–131 (2002).
Fujihara, Y. et al. Sperm equatorial segment protein 1, SPESP1, is required for fully fertile sperm in mouse. J. Cell Sci. 123, 1531–1536 (2010).
Ashrafzadeh, A., Karsani, S. A. & Nathan, S. Mammalian sperm fertility related proteins. Int. J. Med. Sci. 10, 1649–1657 (2013).
Buffone, M. G. et al. Heads or tails? Structural events and molecular mechanisms that promote mammalian sperm acrosomal exocytosis and motility. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 79, 4–18 (2012).
Noda, T., Sakase, M., Fukushima, M. & Harayama, H. Novel approach for the detection of the vestiges of testicular mRNA splicing errors in mature spermatozoa of Japanese black bulls. PLoS ONE 8, e57296 (2013).
Harayama, H. Flagellar hyperactivation of bull and boar spermatozoa. Reprod. Med. Biol. 17, 442–448 (2018).
Garrido, N. et al. Contribution of sperm molecular features to embryo quality and assisted reproduction success. Reprod. Biomed. 17, 855–865 (2008).
Mostek, A. et al. Differences in sperm protein abundance and carbonylation level in bull ejaculates of low and high quality. PLOS One 13, e0206150 (2018).
Seligman, J., Zipser, Y. & Kosower, N. S. Tyrosine phosphorylation, thiol status, and protein tyrosine phosphatase in rat epididymal spermatozoa. Biol. Reprod. 71, 1009–1015 (2004).
Patrat, C., Serres, C. & Jouannet, P. The acrosome reaction in human spermatozoa. Biol. Cell 92, 255–266 (2000).
Waters, S. I. & White, J. M. Biochemical and molecular characterization of bovine fertilin α and β (ADAM 1 and ADAM 2): A candidate sperm-egg binding/fusion complex. Biol. Reprod. 56, 1245–1254 (1997).
Caballero, J. N. et al. Epithelial cadherin is present in bovine oviduct epithelial cells and gametes, and is involved in fertilization-related events. Theriogenology 81, 1189–1206 (2014).
Sahin, Z. et al. Effect of experimental varicocele on the expressions of notch 1, 2, and 3 in rat testes: An immunohistochemical study. Fertil. Steril. 83, 86–94 (2005).
Hofmann, M.-C., Braydich-Stolle, L. & Dym, M. Isolation of male germ-line stem cells; influence of GDNF. Dev. Biol. 279, 114–124 (2005).
Fujihara, Y. et al. SPACA1-deficient male mice are infertile with abnormally shaped sperm heads reminiscent of globozoospermia. Development 139, 3583–3589 (2012).
Khawar, M. B., Gao, H. & Li, W. Mechanism of acrosome biogenesis in mammals. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 7, 195 (2019).
Funding
This study was supported by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT), under projects UIDB/00276/2020 (CIISA) and LA/P/0059/2020 (AL4AnimalS). ES is funded by FCT (https://doi.org/10.54499/CEECINST/00140/2021/CP2807/CT0001). The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
PD and IL: Investigation, methodology, formal analysis, and writing—original draft preparation. MRB: Investigation, methodology and formal analysis; ACT and LM: review and editing. ES and LLC: conceptualization, supervision, and funding acquisition, methodology and validation, formal analysis, writing—review and editing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Diniz, P., Leites, I., R. Batista, M. et al. Characterization of expression patterns and dynamic relocation of Notch proteins during acrosome reaction of bull spermatozoa. Sci Rep 14, 14925 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-65950-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-65950-0
- Springer Nature Limited