Abstract
A total of 176 homestead forests at three altitudes in the Chittagong Hill Tracts, Bangladesh were randomly surveyed to estimate carbon (C) stocks and how stand structure affects the biomass C. All woody vegetations were measured, and litter and soil (0–30 cm depth) were sampled. The tree biomass C stock in the top two altitude forests was up to 37–48% higher than in low altitude, owing to significantly higher tree density and species diversity. An increase in species diversity index by one unit increased the biomass stock by 23 Mg C ha−1. The C stock of litterfall in low altitude forests was 22–28% higher than in the top two altitude due to the deposition of litters downslope and deliberate use of mulch for soil improvement and conservation, resulting in up to 5% higher total soil C. The topsoil C was 10–25% higher than the deeper soil, depending on the altitude. The forest stored 89 Mg C ha−1, indicating a potential for C sequestration in trees outside forest. This study would help policymakers to strengthen the recognition of small-scale forests for mitigation in REDD + (reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation, the role of conservation, sustainable management of forests, and enhancement of forest carbon stocks) and support owners through C credits from sustainably managed forests.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Introduction
In Bangladesh, CO2 emissions increased by 609% from 1990 to 2017 due to increased energy consumption and land use change1. A gradual increase in the emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) is believed to be a major contributor to global warming2,3,4. Although Bangladesh makes up only a small contribution to global emissions, the country is expected to be among the most vulnerable to climate change5,6. Tropical forests have the potentials of removing atmospheric CO2 emissions7,8,9 and store up to one-fourth of the global terrestrial carbon (C)10. Tropical homestead forests, are rich in biodiversity, sequester, and store C in biomass and soil11,12,13,14. Management strategies also affect C sequestered in homestead forests15. Assessing the C sequestration potential of homestead forests is essential to understand their mitigation potentials against climate change. Nevertheless, the potential of homestead forests in sequestering C has not yet been fully recognized and researched13,16 due to their diverse nature and thus the difficulty in the assessment.
In Bangladesh, homestead forests are some of the most productive systems and unique land uses17. About 80–90% of the demand for timber and fuelwood is met from the homestead forests18,19. Homestead forests cover 0.27 million hectares, which makes up 10% of the total tree-based land cover and 2% of the total land area20,21. Homestead forests thus possess the potential to sequestrate a considerable quantity of C22,23,24. However, the structural variation in a forest (e.g., tree height, diameter at breast height DBH, density, basal area BA, and species diversity) affects the C dynamics23,25,26.
In addition to above-ground-biomass (AGB), litter also contribute to soil organic carbon (SOC). Litter includes leaves, fine roots, and woody debris of diameter 2–5 cm27. The litterfalls store a small fraction of C to the AGB in forest ecosystems28, depending on the amount of litterfalls, forest type, and tree species29,30. Studies on the estimation of litterfalls C in tropical forests have been sporadic31. However, as it is an important C pool32, it needs to be taken into account when estimating the entire C dynamics of homestead forests33. Litters of homestead forests have traditionally been managed to form mulch and manure for reducing evaporation, conserving soil, and maintaining fertilty31,34,35. Moreover, litter is one of the traditional energy sources in rural households of Bangladesh36.
Forest soils represent a significant amount of Earth`s terrestrial C37. The concentration and stock of C are affected by using land for either forest or agriculture in the tropics. Previous studies found variation in soil organic carbon (SOC) in forested and degraded sites38,39,40 and in tropical agroforestry or home garden systems41,42,43,44, depending on AGB, tree density, and species richness. For example, tree species diversity and litter input affect SOC potential, which may also depend on other environmental factors e.g. availability of moisture34,45. With the slow decomposition of litter, organic matter accumulates and SOC increases, but increased water and nutrient enhance decomposition of litter and thereby decrease SOC stock under relatively dry conditions while releasing CO2 to the atmosphere46,47. Management of home garden in the form of tillage, mulching, and soil compaction may be another driving force for C exchange48,49,50. The variation in SOC stock is influenced by addition and removal of biomass due to management activities, an underlying processes in the soil51,52.
Under such backdrops, our study aims to estimate the carbon stocks in the hill homestead forest ecosystem (trees, litterfall, and soil) as mitigation potential to climate change. We hypothesized that this homestead forest will show similar soil C status compared to neighbouring secondary hill forests and a differential potential of C stock in variable altitude position in the hill. Moreover, homestead forests of variable altitude position may have a difference in stand structure and species diversity, which would affect the litter deposition and C stocks. Hence our second hypothesis was that tree species diversity and stand structure affect the tree biomass C stocks and as well as soil C stocks in the homestead forests. This research is a pilot study of carbon in one of the most common anthropogenic environments in Bangladesh.
Results
Carbon stocks of tree biomass (above ground and living roots) and fallen litter in homestead forests
The tree biomass C stock was higher in the high and medium altitude than in the low altitude homestead forests, though the difference among the altitudes was not significant (p ≤ 0.05) (Table 1). The C in fallen litter biomass decreased with increasing altitude (Table 1).
Stand structure of homestead forests
We sampled a total of 2873 individuals of a total of 71 tree species in the homestead forests across the three altitudes. A total of 968, 981, and 924 individuals belonging to 64, 63, and 64 species were recorded in the low, medium, and high-altitude ranges, respectively, within an average homestead forest area of only 0.04 ha.
Mean tree height 6.1 m, DBH 17.6 cm, density 478.9 trees ha−1, BA 19.2 m2 ha−1, species diversity 1.8, and richness 2.39 in the homestead forests. Mean tree height, DBH, BA, and species richness in homestead forests did not vary significantly (p ≤ 0.05) among the altitudes (Fig. 1). The tree density of homestead forests was significantly (p ≤ 0.05) higher in the high altitude than in the low altitude, while in the medium altitude it was not significantly different from that in the other two altitudes. The tree species diversity of homestead forests was significantly (p ≤ 0.05) higher in the medium-altitude range than that in the high altitude, while in the low altitude it was not significantly different from the other two altitudes (Fig. 1).
Stand structure influencing tree biomass carbon stock in homestead forests
Figure 2 shows the significant (p ≤ 0.05) positive association between the tree biomass C and the stand structure of homestead forests. Multiple regression analysis depicted that 88% of the variability in biomass C stock was explained by the factors including the tree height, DBH, density, BA, species diversity, and richness together (Table A.1). Specifically, BA explained 85% of the total variation in C stocks (Fig. 2).
Bulk density (BD) and soil organic carbon (SOC) concentrations and stocks in the soil
In the homestead forests, mean values in soil BD increased with depth while C concentration decreased (Fig. 3). Regarding the range, the highest BD and SOC concentration across the soil depths were in the high and low altitude, respectively (Fig. 3).
The SOC stock decreased in the homestead forests with depth (Fig. 4). Regarding the range, the highest total SOC stocks across the depths were at the low altitude forests (Fig. 4).
Discussion
In this study, the highest tree biomass (above ground and living roots) C stock was found in the top two altitude homestead forests, which was up to 37–48% higher than at low altitude. This may be ascribed to the higher tree density, species diversity, and richness in top two altitude forests. An increase in species diversity and richness, each by one unit increased the tree biomass C stock by 23 and 12 Mg C ha−1, respectively (Fig. 2e,f). Our findings corroborate with other studies on homestead forests in Bangladesh and tropical forests of Asia and Africa, in which, higher tree biomass C was related to higher species diversity, richness, and tree density23,26,40,53,54. However, an insignificant variation in tree DBH and BA might have resulted in the insignificant differences in C stocks of biomass among three altitude homestead forests.
The estimated average tree biomass carbon (36.35 Mg C ha−1) in this homestead forest may be compared to Kumar12 estimating 16–36 Mg C ha−1 in Kerala home gardens in India. Conversely, these findings were only about 1/3 of those reported from the hill and mangrove forests of Bangladesh55,56, where the natural forests have a higher tree density, BA, and DBH. For example, compared to the findings of this study, a higher tree DBH of 10–56 cm contributed 84% of the total biomass C in mangrove forest56 and higher tree density (4258 ha−1) and BA (52.6 m2 ha−1) resulted in higher C stocks in roadside plantation55. Our study also revealed a significantly strong positive relationship between tree biomass C stock and BA and DBH. An increase in BA and DBH by 1 m2 and 1 cm, respectively increased the biomass C stock by 2 and 4 Mg C ha−1 (Fig. 2b,d). This was because homestead forest owners tended to reduce the tree size (height and BA) due to their small fields. Moreover, the thinning of trees and bamboo to meet the demand of timber for their consumption and household income was a regular practice, decreasing tree BA.
We found the highest C stock of litterfall in low altitude homestead forests, which was 22–28% higher than at the other two altitudes due to the deposition of litters. This may be explained by the fact that the homesteads are located on the sloping ground, where trees deposit litterfalls downslope by gravity. Litter in the low altitude had a deliberate function of pruned materials being used as mulch for erosion mitigation. Regardless of the altitude, the average C stock in litterfall was about 1% of the total tree biomass C, which was approximately half of the reported 1.8% in the hill forests of Bangladesh29. While litter accumulates in the natural hill forests, homestead forests, which were traditionally well managed providing branches e.g. for fuel, had much lower litter accumulation. However, litter C was not addressed as much as required in assessing ecosystem C stocks, specifically in tropical forests due to a small fraction of AGB33.
The bulk density (BD) of this soil (1.18–1.25 g cm−3) is within the range (1.22–1.58 g cm−3) observed in the forested and degraded area in the Chittagong hill tract38. The BD increased due to a reduction in litterfall deposition on the soil surface. This has also occurred in our case, a relatively smaller amount of litter and organic matter increased BD at high altitude homestead forests and in soils of the middle and deepest layers. This is consistent with Asok and Sobha57 indicating BD increased with depth. Périé and Ouimet58 found a close relation between BD and organic matter. The lower BD of the topmost layer in our samples may thus be ascribed to the accumulation of litters59.
We found an apparent vertical decline in concentration and stocks of SOC in three homestead forest ranges. The total SOC stock was highest (54.5 Mg ha−1) at the low altitude forests and the topsoil C was 10–25% higher than the deeper soil, depending on the altitude, due to the deposition of litterfall. Litter addition may enhance decomposition and trapping SOC in forests60,61,62. The overall SOC stock (52.83 Mg ha−1) in our study site is in line with the hill (50.5–57.6 Mg ha−1) and sal (58.5 Mg ha−1) forests of Bangladesh21,29,62,63,64, homestead forests (61.6 Mg ha−1), and woodlot agroforestry (48.6 Mg ha−1) in Ethiopia65. The resulted mineralization and underlying processes may influence the stabilization of C in tropical soil51,66. Since leaves, twigs, and branches store a significant proportion of nutrients, their removal causes a reduction in the supply of nutrients to the soil, which may lead to diminished growth. This lower growth of trees, in turn, is likely to reduce C sequestration potential and litter input in the soil. However, a long-run experimental study to observe the growth after removal of litter, branches, and performing thinning would be necessary to establish the link between litter and growth.
Policy implications and concluding remarks
The relatively high-altitude homestead forests with higher tree density, BA, and species diversity stored 37–48% higher tree biomass (above ground and living roots) C compared to the low altitude. However, low altitude homestead forests stored up to 5% higher total SOC compared to the relatively high altitude forests due to higher deposition of litter and management of trees and litters in soil conservation. The C stock of litterfall was highest in low altitude homestead forests. The homestead forest ecosystems stored a total of 89 Mg C ha−1, which was higher than degraded natural forests (at 10 cm depth of soil)40, indicating a significant reservoir of C in the trees outside forest (TOF). The integration of indigenous management into scientific management of homestead forests can augment the potentials of C sequestration in TOF while conserving floral biodiversity, moisture, and hill soil from erosion.
Upscaling the amount of C stock to be 24 Mt for the total area of the homestead forests of Bangladesh, would have a great potential for climate change mitigation through using REDD + and CDM mechanisms. Total annual emissions in Bangladesh are 78 Mt of CO21. The applicability of REDD + in C financing for the conservation of forests is wider, especially in tropical forests67, but the potentials of small scale forests such as homestead forests are ignored due to a lack of documentation of estimated C. The present documentation may help policymakers strengthening their recognition for mitigation in REDD+ and thereby support the livelihood of small-scale forest owners through ensuring sustaianble conservation and management of forest.
Materials and methods
Study site and sampling strategy
We conducted this study in the homestead forests of Bandarban Sadar Upazila (sub-district) under Bandarban district located in the Chittagong Hill Tracts, Bangladesh (Fig. 5). Bandarban is a very remote and least populous district at 526–1003 masl covering an area of 4479 km268. It enjoys a tropical climate, with a mean annual rainfall of 2630 mm and a temperature of 28 °C69. It comprises public forests of 322,753 ha, which are managed by the Bangladesh Forest Department (BFD) and district administration20. Homestead forests are owned and managed by the households. The landscape consists of steep mountains with 90% of the texture ranging from sandy loamto clay loam soil70. The soil is erosion-prone during rainfall; especially in connection with shifting cultivation, which is a prevalent practice. Amongst the top 10 vulnerable districts in Bangladesh, Bandarban is rated as the second most vulnerable on direct and indirect impacts of climate change5. The district is added as a new hotspot and will likely be the worst affected region by 2050 in terms of deforestation which has recently brought in major landslides and destruction of properties5.
Bandarban Sadar Upazila is situated between 21°55′ and 22°2′ N latitude and 92°08′ and 92°20′ E longitude68. It has a total population of around 70,000 and occupies an area of 502 km2, of which 85 km2 is forest68. The land is classified as a high, medium-high, low hill, and valley and high land, where dominant landuses are forest, agriculture, and shifting cultivation71. The local inhabitants are predominantly dependent on local natural resources for their livelihoods. Biodiversity is high but threatened by overexploitation of the resources.
Three Unions out of five selected for sampling were Rajbila, Swalak, and Tankabati, the areas of which were 10,360, 7511, and 15,281 ha, respectively72. We categorized Rajbila, Swalak, and Tankabati Unions as low, medium, and high ranges, respectively (Fig. 5), as they are located in the altitude of 28–43, 134, and 410 masl72. We assumed that every household owns a homestead forest of variable size. A total of 176 homestead forests proportionately comprising 56, 54, and 66 in low, medium, and high altitudes (Fig. 5), respectively, were randomly surveyed at a sampling intensity of 5% from the lists supplied by the Bandarban Sadar Upazila office.
Woody vegetation survey in homestead forests
Every homestead forest, based on the size and the direction from the house, was divided into 1–15 quadrats of (5 m × 5 m) size. All woody plants except seedlings were identified and measured in height (m) and DBH (cm) in 2019 (September-December). The areas of the homestead forests (ha) were measured. We identified the tree species by the local name with the assistance of the owners of the homestead forests, and in a few cases, prepared herbarium to ensure the proper identification. A rangefinder for measuring height and a diameter tape for DBH was used. The coordinates of each sampling point were recorded by GPS.
Sampling of soil and fallen litters
Fallen litters were collected once using a metallic frame at each of 5 points of an area of 1 m2 (1 m × 1 m) depending on the availability for each of the three different altitudes, thus comprising a total of 15 samples. For soil sampling, a pit of 30 cm depth, under the litter layer, was dug by using a soil auger (height 40 cm), and soil samples at 0–10, 10–20, and 20–30 cm depth were collected. Hence 15 (3 depths × 5 points) samples from each altitude-forest thus making a total of 45 (15 × 3) samples collected. Following the same procedure, 45 unaltered soil samples to measure BD were collected using a core (volume 100 cm3) at the same three depths in each soil sampling point73. The litter and soil samples collection were performed in accordance to the approval of The Director, Institute of Forestry and Environmental Sciences, University of Chittagong, Bangladesh.
Data analyses
Estimation of tree biomass
Above-ground biomass (AGB) was estimated by using allometric equations for tropical trees, Cocos nucifera, Areca catechu, and Phoenix dactylifera (Eqs. 1–4; Table 2). Living root biomass was estimated as 15% of AGB75. Both AGB and living roots were summed up to estimate tree biomass and 50% C of dry mass was used to quantify total C stock (Mg ha−1) (Eq. 5). To estimate AGB, wood density (g cm−3), a required variable, was collected from Bangladesh Forest Research Institute (BFRI)76. For those not found in BFRI publications, we used the global wood density database77,78.
Estimation of tree density, basal area, and biodiversity indices
The tree species richness and diversity were calculated by Margalef index and Shannon-Weiner index, respectively (Eqs. 6 and 7; Table 2). The higher indices indicate higher species richness and diversity of the population. The tree density (tree ha−1) and BA (m2 ha−1) were also calculated (Eqs. 8–10; Table 2). Mean values of the tree height, DBH, density, BA, and all indices were compared among homestead forests of three altitudes.
Laboratory analysis for litterfall and mineral soil
Soil organic carbon (SOC) was determined by the loss on ignition (LOI) method following Ball. Firstly, soils were oven-dried at 105 °C for 72 h. Secondly, silica crucibles were cleaned and oven-dried by heating (at 105 °C for 30 min) and cooled in desiccators, and then weighed. Dried soils were ground by pestle and then exactly 5 g of grind soils were reweighed on an electric balance and kept in silica crucibles. The crucibles with soil were then transferred to an electric muffle furnace for igniting at 850 °C for one and half an hour. Then crucibles with soils were cooled in the desiccator and reweighed to determine LOI (%), from which, SOC (%) was calculated (Eqs. 11 and 12; Table 2). Stocks of SOC (Mg ha−1) were estimated using BD (g cm−3) (Eq. 13). To determine BD, the soil samples collected in the core segment were weighed, air-dried, and passed through a sieve (2 mm) accordingly to remove all the foreign materials, and thereafter oven-dried at 105 °C for 72 h. We calculated soil BD as the quotient between the dry mass of the fine fraction in the core segment and the volume of that soil sample.
For the estimation of C in the fallen litter, we used following method: after taking the fresh mass of the sample collected from each point, we made and labelled adequate subsamples from the weighted original sample. We then measured the wet masses of all the subsamples. Subsamples were oven-dried at 65 °C until reaching a constant mass which was recorded. Then, the dry mass of the original sample from the wet to dry ratio of the subsamples was estimated (Eqs. 14 and 15; Table 2). The C concentration was considered to be 45% of the dry mass of litter89 (Coleman 1972). The process was carried out for all 15 original samples collected from homestead forests across three different altitudes. C stocks (Mg C ha−1) in litterfalls were calculated for three different altitudes.
Statistical analyses
For statistical analysis, the normality of data was verified by using Kolmogorov–Smirnov (K–S) Test. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) determined the significant difference in mean values of tree height, DBH, density, BA, all indices, and biomass C stocks of homestead forests among three altitudes. Duncan's Multiple Range Test (DMRT) was performed to determine which homestead forest of an altitude significantly differed from the other categories of the altitudes. For mineral soil, two-way ANOVA was used to determine any statistically significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) of concentration and stock of SOC and BD against three altitude homestead forests and three soil depths. We also performed correlation and regression analyses to determine the effects of tree mean height, DBH, density, BA, species diversity, and richness on biomass C. For performing statistical analysis, we used statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) 20.
References
IEA. Renewables information 2019 overview. Clim. Change 2013 Phys. Sci. Basis 53, 1–30 (2019).
IPCC. Summary for Policymakers. In: Global warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. [V. Masson-Delmotte, P. Zhai, H. O. Pörtner, D. Roberts, J. Skea, P. R. Shukla, A. Pirani, W. Moufouma-Okia, C. Péan, R. Pidcock, S. Connors, J. B. R. Matthews, Y. Chen, X. Zhou, M. I. Gomis, E. Lonnoy, T. Maycock, M. Tignor, T. Waterfield (eds.)]. (2018).
IPCC. Foreword, Preface, Dedication and In Memoriam. Clim. Chang. 2014 Mitig. Clim. Chang. Contrib. Work. Gr. III to Fifth Assess. Rep. Intergov. Panel Clim. Chang. 1454 (2014).
Shakoor, A. et al. Biogeochemical transformation of greenhouse gas emissions from terrestrial to atmospheric environment and potential feedback to climate forcing. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 27, 38513–38536 (2020).
Mani, M., Bandyopadhyay, S., Chonabayashi, S., Markandya, A. & Mosier, T. South Asia’s Hotspots: The Impact of Temperature and Precipitation Changes on Living Standards. South Asia’s Hotspots: The Impact of Temperature and Precipitation Changes on Living Standards (2018). https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1155-5.
Sarkar, M. S. K., Sadeka, S., Sikdar, M. M. H. & Badiuzzaman. Energy consumption and CO2 emission in Bangladesh: Trends and policy implications. Asia Pac. J. Energy Environ. 5, 41–48 (2018).
Mitchard, E. T. A. The tropical forest carbon cycle and climate change. Nature 559, 527–534 (2018).
Dixon, R. K. et al. Carbon pools and flux of global forest ecosystems. Science 263, 185–190 (1994).
Adame, M. F. et al. Carbon stocks of tropical coastal wetlands within the Karstic landscape of the Mexican Caribbean. PLoS ONE 8, e56569 (2013).
Bonan, G. B. Forests and climate change: Forcings, feedbacks, and the climate benefits of forests. Science 320, 1444–1449 (2008).
Henry, M. et al. Biodiversity, carbon stocks and sequestration potential in aboveground biomass in smallholder farming systems of western Kenya. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 129, 238–252 (2009).
Kumar, B. M. Species richness and aboveground carbon stocks in the homegardens of central Kerala, India. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 140, 430–440 (2011).
Mattsson, E., Ostwald, M., Nissanka, S. P. & Pushpakumara, D. K. N. G. Quantification of carbon stock and tree diversity of homegardens in a dry zone area of Moneragala district, Sri Lanka. Agrofor. Syst. 89, 435–445 (2015).
Nair, P. K. R., Kumar, B. M. & Nair, V. D. Agroforestry as a strategy for carbon sequestration. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 172, 10–23 (2009).
Murthy, I. K. Carbon sequestration potential of agroforestry systems in India. J. Earth Sci. Clim. Change 4, 1–7 (2013).
Delgado, J. A. et al. Conservation practices to mitigate and adapt to climate change. J. Soil Water Conserv. 66, 118–129 (2011).
Kabir, M. E. & Webb, E. L. Can homegardens conserve biodiversity in Bangladesh?. Biotropica 40, 95–103 (2008).
FD [Forest Department]. Bangladesh Forestry Master Plan 2017–2036, 2036 (2017).
Mather, A. Global forest resources assessment 2000 main report. Land Use Policy 20, 195 (2003).
FD [Forest Department]. District wise forest area of Bangladesh 2016. Preprint at http://www.bforest.gov.bd/ (2020).
Mukul, S. A. et al. A new estimate of carbon for Bangladesh forest ecosystems with their spatial distribution and REDD+ implications. Int. J. Res. Land-use Sustain. 1, 33–41 (2014).
Nath, T. K., Aziz, N. & Inoue, M. Contribution of homestead forests to rural economy and climate change mitigation: A study from the ecologically critical area of Cox’s Bazar—Teknaf Peninsula, Bangladesh. Small-scale For. 14, 1–18 (2015).
Jaman, M. S. et al. Quantification of carbon stock and tree diversity of homegardens in Rangpur District, Bangladesh. Int. J. Agric. For. 6, 169–180 (2016).
Wang, S. & Huang, Y. Determinants of soil organic carbon sequestration and its contribution to ecosystem carbon sinks of planted forests. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 3163–3173 (2020).
Khan, M. N. I. et al. Allometric relationships of stand level carbon stocks to basal area, tree height and wood density of nine tree species in Bangladesh. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 22, e01025 (2020).
Shen, Y. et al. Tree aboveground carbon storage correlates with environmental gradients and functional diversity in a tropical forest. Sci. Rep. 6, 25304 (2016).
Petrokofsky, G. et al. Comparison of methods for measuring and assessing carbon stocks and carbon stock changes in terrestrial carbon pools. How do the accuracy and precision of current methods compare? A systematic review protocol. Environ. Evid. 1, 1–21 (2012).
Dondini, M., Hastings, A., Saiz, G., Jones, M. B. & Smith, P. The potential of Miscanthus to sequester carbon in soils: Comparing field measurements in Carlow, Ireland to model predictions. GCB Bioenergy 1, 413–425 (2009).
Ullah, M. R. & Al-Amin, M. Above- and below-ground carbon stock estimation in a natural forest of Bangladesh. J. For. Sci. 58, 372–379 (2012).
Nouvellon, Y. et al. Age-related changes in litter inputs explain annual trends in soil CO2 effluxes over a full Eucalyptus rotation after afforestation of a tropical savannah. Biogeochemistry 111, 515–533 (2012).
Krishna, M. P. & Mohan, M. Litter decomposition in forest ecosystems: A review. Energy Ecol. Environ. 2, 236–249 (2017).
Patra, P. K. et al. The carbon budget of South Asia. Biogeosciences 10, 513–527 (2013).
Ostertag, R., Marín-Spiotta, E., Silver, W. L. & Schulten, J. Litterfall and decomposition in relation to soil carbon pools along a secondary forest chronosequence in Puerto Rico. Ecosystems 11, 701–714 (2008).
Nair, P. K. R. & Garrity, D. Afroforestry—The Future of Global Land Use, Advances in Agroforestry (Springer, 2012) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4676-3_1.
Abrar, M. M. et al. Variations in the profile distribution and protection mechanisms of organic carbon under long-term fertilization in a Chinese Mollisol. Sci. Total Environ. 723, 138181 (2020).
Baul, T. K., Datta, D. & Alam, A. A comparative study on household level energy consumption and related emissions from renewable (biomass) and non-renewable energy sources in Bangladesh. Energy Policy https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.12.037 (2018).
Mackey, B. et al. Understanding the importance of primary tropical forest protection as a mitigation strategy. Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Change 25, 763–787 (2020).
Zaman, M. A., Osman, K. T. & Sirajul Haque, S. M. Comparative study of some soil properties in forested and deforested areas in Cox’s Bazar and Rangamati Districts, Bangladesh. J. For. Res. 21, 319–322 (2010).
Akhtaruzzaman, M., Osman, K. T. & Sirajul Haque, S. M. Soil properties in two forest sites in Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh. J. For. Environ. Sci. 31, 280–287 (2015).
Islam, M., Deb, G. P. & Rahman, M. Forest fragmentation reduced carbon storage in a moist tropical forest in Bangladesh: Implications for policy development. Land Use Policy 65, 15–25 (2017).
Nair, P. K. R., Nair, V. D., Kumar, B. M. & Haile, S. G. Soil carbon sequestration in tropical agroforestry systems: A feasibility appraisal. Environ. Sci. Policy 12, 1099–1111 (2009).
Aryal, D. R., Gómez-González, R. R., Hernández-Nuriasmú, R. & Morales-Ruiz, D. E. Carbon stocks and tree diversity in scattered tree silvopastoral systems in Chiapas, Mexico. Agrofor. Syst. 93, 213–227 (2019).
Islam, M., Dey, A. & Rahman, M. Effect of tree diversity on soil organic carbon content in the homegarden agroforestry system of North-Eastern Bangladesh. Small-scale For. 14, 91–101 (2015).
Saha, S. K., Nair, P. K. R., Nair, V. D. & Kumar, B. M. Soil carbon stock in relation to plant diversity of homegardens in Kerala, India. Agrofor. Syst. 76, 53–65 (2009).
Kothandaraman, S., Dar, J. A., Sundarapandian, S., Dayanandan, S. & Khan, M. L. Ecosystem-level carbon storage and its links to diversity, structural and environmental drivers in tropical forests of Western Ghats, India. Sci. Rep. 10, 1–15 (2020).
Youkhana, A. & Idol, T. Tree pruning mulch increases soil C and N in a shaded coffee agroecosystem in Hawaii. Soil Biol. Biochem. 41, 2527–2534 (2009).
Flessa, H. et al. Storage and stability of organic matter and fossil carbon in a Luvisol and Phaeozem with continuous maize cropping: A synthesis. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 171, 36–51 (2008).
Semere, M. Biomass and soil carbon stocks assessment of agroforestry systems and adjacent cultivated land, in Cheha Wereda, Gurage Zone, Ethiopia. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Nat. Resour. 20, 119–125 (2019).
Ramachandran Nair, P. K., Nair, V. D., Mohan Kumar, B. & Showalter, J. M. Carbon sequestration in agroforestry systems. Adv. Agron. 108, 237–307 (2010).
Mustafa, A. et al. Soil aggregation and soil aggregate stability regulate organic carbon and nitrogen storage in a red soil of southern China. J. Environ. Manag. 270, 110894 (2020).
Sayer, E. J. et al. Tropical forest soil carbon stocks do not increase despite 15 years of doubled litter inputs. Sci. Rep. 9, 1–9 (2019).
Rahman, M., Biswas, J., Maniruzzaman, M., Choudhury, A. & Ahmed, F. Effect of tillage practices and rice straw management on soil environment and carbon dioxide emission. Agriculture 15, 127–142 (2017).
Day, M., Baldauf, C., Rutishauser, E. & Sunderland, T. C. H. Relationships between tree species diversity and above-ground biomass in Central African rainforests: Implications for REDD. Environ. Conserv. 41, 64–72 (2014).
Poorter, L. et al. Diversity enhances carbon storage in tropical forests. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 24, 1314–1328 (2015).
Rahman, M. M., Kabir, M. E., Jahir Uddin Akon, A. S. M. & Ando, K. High carbon stocks in roadside plantations under participatory management in Bangladesh. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 3, 412–423 (2015).
Kamruzzaman, M., Ahmed, S., Paul, S., Rahman, M. M. & Osawa, A. Stand structure and carbon storage in the oligohaline zone of the Sundarbans mangrove forest, Bangladesh. For. Sci. Technol. 14, 23–28 (2018).
Asok, S. & Sobha, V. Analysis of variation of soil bulk densities with respect to different vegetation classes, in a tropical rain forest—A study in Shendurney Wildlife Sanctuary, S. Kerala, India. Glob. J. Environ. Res. 8, 17–20 (2014).
Périé, C. & Ouimet, R. Organic carbon, organic matter and bulk density relationships in boreal forest soils. Can. J. Soil Sci. 88, 315–325 (2008).
Biswas, A., Alamgir, M., Haque, S. M. S. & Osman, K. T. Study on soils under shifting cultivation and other land use categories in Chittagong Hill Tracts, Bangladesh. J. For. Res. 23, 261–265 (2012).
Leff, J. W. et al. Experimental litterfall manipulation drives large and rapid changes in soil carbon cycling in a wet tropical forest. Glob. Change Biol. 18, 2969–2979 (2012).
Wang, Q., He, T., Wang, S. & Liu, L. Carbon input manipulation affects soil respiration and microbial community composition in a subtropical coniferous forest. Agric. For. Meteorol. 178–179, 152–160 (2013).
Ali Shah, S. A. et al. Long-term fertilization affects functional soil organic carbon protection mechanisms in a profile of Chinese loess plateau soil. Chemosphere 267, 128897 (2021).
Miah, D., Uddin, M. F., Bhuiyan, M. K., Koike, M. & Shin, M. Y. Carbon sequestration by the indigenous tree species in the reforestation program in Bangladesh-aphanamixis polystachya Wall. and Parker. Forest Sci. Technol. 5, 62–65 (2009).
Kibria, M. G. & Saha, N. Analysis of existing agroforestry practices in Madhupur Sal forest: An assessment based on ecological and economic perspectives. J. For. Res. 22, 533–542 (2011).
Mikrewongel Tadesse, A. B. Estimation of carbon stored in agroforestry practices in Gununo Watershed, Wolayitta Zone, Ethiopia. J. Ecosyst. Ecogr. 05, 1–5 (2015).
Abrar, M. M. et al. Carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus stoichiometry mediate sensitivity of carbon stabilization mechanisms along with surface layers of a Mollisol after long-term fertilization in Northeast China. J. Soils Sediments 21, 705–723 (2021).
Ahmed, N. & Glaser, M. Coastal aquaculture, mangrove deforestation and blue carbon emissions: Is REDD+ a solution?. Mar. Policy 66, 58–66 (2016).
BBS [Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics]. Statistical yearbook of Bangladesh 2018. Statistics Division, Ministry of Planning, Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh (2019).
BMD [Bangladesh Metereological Department]. Cox’s Bazar region, Chittagong, Bangladesh (2020).
Osman, K. S., Jashimuddin, M., Haque, S. M. S. & Miah, S. Effect of shifting cultivation on soil physical and chemical properties in Bandarban hill district, Bangladesh. J. For. Res. 24, 791–795 (2013).
SRDI. Soil resource development institute. Annu. Report. Soil Resour. Dev. Institute, Dhaka, Bangladesh (2018).
Upazila Parishad Office. Bandarban Sadar Upazila, Bandarban District, Chittagong Hill Trcats, Bangladesh (2019).
Blake, G. R. Bulk density. In Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1 (eds Black, C. A. et al.) 894–895 (American Society of Agronomy Inc., 1965).
Chave, J. et al. Improved allometric models to estimate the aboveground biomass of tropical trees. Glob. Change Biol. 20, 3177–3190 (2014).
Macdicken, K. G. A guide to monitoring carbon storage in forestry and agroforestry projects (2015).
Sattar, M. A., Bhattacharje, D. K. & Kabir, M. F. Physical and Mechanical Properties and Uses of Timbers of Bangladesh (Bangladesh Forest Research Institute, 1999).
Chave, J. et al. Towards a worldwide wood economics spectrum. Ecol. Lett. 12, 351–366 (2009).
Data Set. Definitions (2020). https://doi.org/10.32388/5b0dft.
Hairiah, K. Measuring carbon stocks: Across land use systems: a manual. Published in close cooperation with Brawijaya University and ICALRRD (Indonesian Center for Agricultural Land Resources Research and Development) (2011).
Frangi, J. L., Lugo, A. E., Forest, F., Frangi, J. L. & Service, F. Ecosystem dynamics of a subtropical floodplain forest published by: Ecological Society of America. Ecosyst. Dyn. Subtrop. 55, 351–369 (2016).
Issa, S., Dahy, B., Ksiksi, T. & Saleous, N. Development of a new allometric equation correlated WTH RS variables for the assessment of date palm biomass. Proc. 39th Asian Conf. Remote Sens. Remote Sens. Enabling Prosper. ACRS 2018 2, 730–739 (2018).
Brown, S. Estimating biomass and biomass change of tropical forests: A Primer. FAO For. Pap. 134, 13–33 (1997).
Margalef, R. Information theory in ecology. Gen. Syst. 3, 36–71 (1958).
Michael, P. Ecological Methods for Field and Laboratory Investigation (Tata Mc Graw Hill, 1990).
Shukla, R. S. & Chandel, P. S. Plant Ecology and Soil Science 9th edn. (S. Chand and Company, 2000).
Ball, D. F. Loss-on-ignition as an estimate. J. Soil Sci. 15, 84–92 (1964).
Pearson, T., Walker, S. & Brown, S. Sourcebook for Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry Projects 29 (Winrock International and the BioCarbon Fund of the World Bank, 2005).
Pearson, T. R. H., Brown, S. L. & Birdsey, R. A. Measurement guidelines for the sequestration of forest carbon. Gen. Tech. Rep. NRS-18. Delaware United States Dep. Agric. For. Serv. 18, 42 (2007).
Coleman, D. C. Soil carbon balance in a successional grassland. Oikos 24, 195–199. https://doi.org/10.2307/3543875 (1973).
Acknowledgements
Authors are highly thankful to the homestead forest owners for their permissions to survey the forests and giving valuable time. In addition, relevant offices of the government offices and key informants of the study area are greatly acknowledged. This work was mainly funded by the Research Cell and Publication of University of Chittagong, Bangladesh.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
T.K.B. conceived the research idea and design, made analyses, interpretation of the results, and preparation of the manuscript. T.A.P. did the fieldwork and organized collected data and was involved in analyses of soil and litter data in the lab. R.N. was involved in research conception, design of data acquisition, and involved in revising the manuscript. L.H.S. made a substantial contribution to editing and revising the manuscript rigorously. S.K. was involved in editing and revising the manuscript critically. All authors read and approved the submitted version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Baul, T.K., Peuly, T.A., Nandi, R. et al. Carbon stocks of homestead forests have a mitigation potential to climate change in Bangladesh. Sci Rep 11, 9254 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-88775-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-88775-7
- Springer Nature Limited