Abstract
Liver X receptors (LXRs) are transcriptional regulators of cellular and systemic cholesterol homeostasis. Under conditions of excess cholesterol, LXR activation induces the expression of several genes involved in cholesterol efflux1, facilitates cholesterol esterification by promoting fatty acid synthesis2, and inhibits cholesterol uptake by the low-density lipoprotein receptor3. The fact that sterol content is maintained in a narrow range in most cell types and in the organism as a whole suggests that extensive crosstalk between regulatory pathways must exist. However, the molecular mechanisms that integrate LXRs with other lipid metabolic pathways are incompletely understood. Here we show that ligand activation of LXRs in mouse liver not only promotes cholesterol efflux, but also simultaneously inhibits cholesterol biosynthesis. We further identify the long non-coding RNA LeXis as a mediator of this effect. Hepatic LeXis expression is robustly induced in response to a Western diet (high in fat and cholesterol) or to pharmacological LXR activation. Raising or lowering LeXis levels in the liver affects the expression of genes involved in cholesterol biosynthesis and alters the cholesterol levels in the liver and plasma. LeXis interacts with and affects the DNA interactions of RALY, a heterogeneous ribonucleoprotein that acts as a transcriptional cofactor for cholesterol biosynthetic genes in the mouse liver. These findings outline a regulatory role for a non-coding RNA in lipid metabolism and advance our understanding of the mechanisms that coordinate sterol homeostasis.
Similar content being viewed by others
Main
It is well established that the cholesterol biosynthetic pathway is downregulated under conditions in which sterols are abundant through the inhibition of sterol regulatory element-binding protein (SREBP) processing4. Notably, however, under conditions in which hepatic cholesterol content was not enriched, activation of LXRs with the selective synthetic agonist GW3965 also acutely suppressed the expression of sterol synthesis genes in mouse liver (Fig. 1a and Extended Data Fig. 1a). The effect could not be explained by changes in intracellular cholesterol levels, as LXR activation has been shown to lower hepatic cholesterol content5, which would lead to upregulation of the SREBP-2 pathway.
To investigate the mechanism by which LXRs suppress cholesterol biosynthesis, we performed genome-wide transcriptional profiling on primary mouse hepatocytes treated with vehicle or GW3965 (Extended Data Fig. 1b). The most robustly induced gene in our RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) analysis was a predicted non-coding RNA annotated as 4930412L05Rik (Extended Data Fig. 1c). Parallel profiling of non-coding and protein-coding transcripts using microarrays also identified 4930412L05Rik as the highest induced transcript (Extended Data Fig. 1d). We named this transcript LeXis (liver-expressed LXR-induced sequence). Notably, the LeXis gene locus lies in close proximity to the canonical LXR target gene Abca1 in mouse. Analysis of chromatin structure from The ENCODE Project6,7 indicated that LeXis and Abca1 were distinct genes with separate promoters (Fig. 1b). We defined the transcripts produced from the LeXis gene using rapid amplification of complementary DNA ends (RACE) (Extended Data Fig. 2). LeXis and Abca1 were induced by LXR and retinoid X receptor (RXR) agonists (LG268 and GW3965, respectively) in primary hepatocytes in an LXR-dependent manner (Fig. 1c and Extended Data Fig. 3a). LeXis was induced in LXRα−/− and LXRβ−/− (also known as Nr1h3−/− and Nr1h2−/−, respectively) hepatocytes, indicating that both LXR isotypes are capable of regulating LeXis (Extended Data Fig. 3b). Induction of LeXis was not sensitive to the protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide, and was not dependent on SREBPs, since 25-hydroxycholesterol (which blocks SREBP processing) also induced LeXis (Extended Data Fig. 3c, d).
Administration of GW3965 to mice induced the expression of LeXis in several metabolically active tissues (Fig. 1d and Extended Data Fig. 3e). We also observed a prominent, LXR-dependent induction of LeXis expression in response to Western diet feeding, consistent with a potential role for LeXis in the response to cholesterol excess (Fig. 1e). Despite being physically adjacent, the LeXis and Abca1 loci are regulated independently. LeXis was neither expressed at baseline nor induced by LXR in mouse peritoneal macrophages, a cell type in which Abca1 expression is prominent (Fig. 1f). A luciferase reporter containing the LeXis promoter was induced by LXR and RXR in co-transfection assays (Extended Data Fig. 3f), and we identified an LXR-response element within the LeXis promoter region that was bound by LXRα in chromatin immunoprecipitation and quantitative PCR (ChIP-qPCR) assays (Extended Data Fig. 3g). The coding potential calculator and coding-non-coding index algorithms predict low coding potential of LeXis (Extended Data Fig. 3h, i). In addition, we found no evidence of production of a protein product from LeXis using in vitro transcription–translation assays (Extended Data Fig. 3j).
To explore the function of LeXis in vivo, we transduced mice with adenoviral vectors encoding green fluorescent protein (GFP) control or LeXis (Fig. 2a and Extended Data Fig. 4a). Remarkably, LeXis expression decreased serum cholesterol, but not triglycerides, in chow-fed C57BL/6 mice (Fig. 2a, b). No differences in liver function tests were observed between the two groups, and there was no evidence of ER stress or inflammation (Fig. 2b and Extended Data Fig. 4b, c). Fractionation of lipoproteins revealed reduced cholesterol in both the low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) fractions in LeXis-expressing mice (Fig. 2c). The effects of LeXis were distinct from the consequences of hepatic expression of other LXR target genes, such as Abca1 and Idol (also known as Mylip), which raise serum cholesterol8,9.
Unbiased pathway analysis of global gene expression revealed that the cholesterol biosynthetic pathway was strongly downregulated in LeXis-transduced livers (Extended Data Fig. 4d). These results were validated by qPCR (Fig. 2d). These results suggested that the cholesterol lowering effects of LeXis were due, at least in part, to suppression of cholesterol biosynthesis. Consistent with this interpretation, we observed a strong trend towards lower cholesterol content in the livers of mice overexpressing LeXis (Extended Data Fig. 4e). For reasons that are not yet clear, treatment of isolated primary hepatocytes did not reflect the effects of either LXR agonist treatment or LeXis expression on genes linked to sterol synthesis (Extended Data Fig. 4f, g).
A reduction in plasma cholesterol suggests an increase in lipoprotein clearance or a decrease in sterol production10. To assess the contribution of the low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) to the actions of LeXis, we transduced Ldlr−/− mice with control or LeXis-expressing adenovirus. We observed decreases in plasma cholesterol levels and hepatic cholesterol content in response to LeXis in Ldlr−/− mice, suggesting that the LDLR is not required for LeXis effects (Fig. 2e and Extended Data Fig. 4h, i). To assess the contribution of SREBP-2 signalling to LXR-mediated inhibition of cholesterologenesis, we administered GW3965 to control or liver-specific SCAP (L-SCAP) knockout mice11. Consistent with previous studies12, GW3965 treatment did not alter serum cholesterol levels in control mice (Fig. 2f). Notably, however, GW3965 increased serum cholesterol levels in L-SCAP knockout mice, suggesting the loss of a suppressive effect (Fig. 2f, g). LXR target genes, including LeXis itself, were induced by GW3965 in both groups; however, the suppression of steroidogenic genes was abrogated in L-SCAP knockout mice (Extended Data Fig. 4j). Furthermore, expression of LeXis also failed to lower serum cholesterol or suppress cholesterogenic gene expression in L-SCAP knockout mice (Fig. 2h and Extended Data Fig. 4k).
To address the role of LeXis in the setting of dietary cholesterol challenge, we used adenoviral vectors to express short hairpin RNA (shRNA) constructs targeting LeXis in mouse liver13,14. Knockdown of LeXis with either of two different shRNA constructs increased serum HDL cholesterol levels in mice fed a Western diet (Extended Data Fig. 5a–d). There was also an increase in liver cholesterol content in shLeXis-transduced mice (Extended Data Fig. 5e). Gene expression analysis revealed increased expression of cholesterol biosynthetic genes in response to LeXis knockdown (Extended Data Fig. 5f). Similar effects of LeXis knockdown were observed in mice treated with GW3965 (Extended Data Fig. 5g, h). There was no consistent evidence of ER stress or inflammation in these experiments (Extended Data Fig. 5i–k).
As a complementary acute loss-of-function approach, we used antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) to target LeXis expression15,16. Three different ASOs that potently blocked hepatic LeXis, but not saline or non-targeting ASO controls, increased serum cholesterol levels in the setting of LXR activation, with no evidence of hepatotoxicity (Fig. 3a, b and Extended Data Fig. 5l, m). Furthermore, LeXis ASO administration increased cholesterogenic gene expression (Fig. 3c).
We generated LeXis-deficient mice to determine the consequences of chronic loss of LeXis function (Extended Data Fig. 6a–c). Although serum cholesterol levels in LeXis-deficient mice in the setting of LXR activation were not different from controls (Fig. 3d), the expression of sterol synthesis genes in the liver was increased (Fig. 3e). Furthermore, LeXis-null mice had increased hepatic cholesterol content when challenged with a Western diet (Fig. 3f). Gross and histological examination of livers from LeXis-deficient null mice showed changes consistent with lipid accumulation (Fig. 3g, h). In contrast to the acute LXR agonist studies above, gene expression analysis of LeXis−/− mice maintained on Western diet showed a trend towards decreased sterol synthetic gene expression, probably reflecting the marked increased hepatic cholesterol content in this setting (Extended Data Fig. 6d).
To begin to understand how LeXis was influencing hepatic metabolism, we analysed its subcellular localization. LeXis was almost exclusively located in the insoluble nuclear pellet in fractionation studies, along with the known nuclear long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) XIST and histone H3 (Fig. 4a). Single molecule RNA fluorescence in-situ hybridization with LeXis-specific probes further confirmed its nuclear localization (Fig. 4b).
Owing to the presence of LeXis in the nucleus, we tested its ability to affect RNA polymerase II-dependent transcription. Expression of LeXis in mouse liver reduced RNA polymerase II engagement at the promoters of Srebf2 and its target genes (Fig. 4c). Previous work has shown that nuclear lncRNAs can affect transcription by modifying the recruitment of proteins to chromatin17. We used an unbiased lncRNA–chromatin affinity capture technique to pull-down LeXis from mouse liver and identify interacting proteins18 (Extended Data Fig. 7a). Analysis of the LeXis interactome by mass spectrometry identified the heterogeneous ribonucleoprotein RALY19 as a binding partner. Similar to LeXis, RALY was located in the nuclear pellet (chromatin) fraction of hepatocytes (Extended Data Fig. 7b). Moreover, an antibody to RALY retrieved LeXis in co-immunoprecipitation studies (Extended Data Fig. 7c, d).
RALY contains both an RNA-binding domain and a leucine-zipper coiled domain, suggesting it may act as a regulatory factor20. Notably, previous unbiased analysis of gene coexpression networks has identified Srebf2 as one of the top genes positively coregulated with Raly21. Other studies have shown direct binding of SREBP-2 at the Raly promoter22. Unbiased protein homology analysis revealed extensive structural conservation between RALY and RNA binding motif protein 14 (RBM14, also known as CoAA)23 (Extended Data Fig. 7e), a known steroid receptor coactivator24. This led us to hypothesize that RALY may act as transcriptional cofactor for genes involved in cholesterol biosynthesis. In line with this idea, adenovirus-mediated knockdown of RALY in mouse liver reduced serum cholesterol, mimicking the effect of LeXis expression (Fig. 4d and Extended Data Fig. 7f). This effect was correlated with reduced expression of Srebf2 and its target genes (Fig. 4e and Extended Data Fig. 7g). Unbiased gene expression profiling of liver revealed that RALY knockdown preferentially affected cholesterol biosynthetic pathways (Extended Data Fig. 8a, b). The effects of RALY were independent of LDLR expression, since they were preserved in Ldlr-null mice (Extended Data Fig. 9a, b). The actions of LeXis in vivo were dependent on RALY, since the ability of LeXis to alter serum cholesterol levels and hepatic gene expression was impaired in the setting of RALY knockdown (Fig. 4f and Extended Data Fig. 9c). Finally, ChIP–qPCR analysis of mouse liver revealed that RALY associated with cholesterol biosynthetic gene promoters, and that RALY occupancy was reduced in the setting of LeXis expression (Extended Data Fig. 9d).
This work identifies the non-coding RNA LeXis as an additional mediator of the complex effects of LXR signalling on hepatic lipid metabolism. Our data suggest that LeXis contributes to the ability of LXRs to inhibit cholesterol synthesis. It is important to acknowledge, however, that the involvement of additional pathways in this crosstalk is not excluded by the present work. The demonstration that LeXis expression is responsive to dietary cues and can modulate physiological pathways with links to common diseases expands our understanding of the regulatory potential of non-coding RNA. Notably, the consequences of acute and chronic loss of LeXis expression are only partially overlapping, perhaps reflecting compensation in the setting of developmental deletion25.
Although the rapid sequence evolution of lncRNAs presents a challenge to identifying functional counterparts between species26, batch coordinate conversion between mouse and human assemblies revealed moderate conservation of the LeXis genomic sequence in a region adjacent to the human ABCA1 gene. An annotated putative lncRNA (TCONS_00016452) in this region was robustly induced by LXR activation in human hepatocyte cell lines (Extended Data Fig. 10). In the future it will be of interest to assess whether this sequence or an as yet to be identified lncRNA is a functional orthologue of LeXis.
Methods
Reagents, plasmids and gene expression
GW3965 was synthesized as previously described27. LG268 was from Ligand Pharmaceuticals. Oxysterols were purchased from Sigma and used as described28. Simvastatin sodium salt was from Calbiochem. Ligands were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide before use in cell culture. LeXis was amplified from GW3695-treated primary mouse hepatocytes using KOD polymerase (Millipore) and primers designed to provide flanking attB sequences and a SacI site at the immediate 3′ end. The fragments were then cloned into pDONR221 using the Gateway system and the minimal SV40 polyadenylation sequence was inserted at the SacI site. For transient transfections and viral vector production the entry clone was transferred into the pAd/CMV/V5-DEST Gateway vector by LR recombination. We estimate transcription from this vector to append 109 nucleotides at the 5′ end, and 29 nucleotides at the 3′ end of the cloned LeXis sequence. To obtain the shLeXis adenovirus, we used BLOCK-iT kit as described (Invitrogen)3. In brief, Invitrogen based software was used for original nucleotide generation targeting the LEXIS fragment and cloned into pENTR/U6. The resulting pENTR/U6-LEXIS shRNA plasmids were tested for their ability to inhibit overexpressed LEXIS in transient transfection experiments in HEK293T cells and then transferred by Gateway recombination into the pAd/BLOCK-iT-DEST destination vector for viral particle generation. Viruses were amplified, purified and titred by Viraquest. For gene expression analysis, RNA was isolated using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) and analysed by qPCR using an Applied Biosystems 7900HT sequence detector or Applied Biosystems Quant Studio 6 Flex. Results are normalized to 36B4 or cyclophilin (also known as Ppia). Immunohistochemical staining of paraffin-embedded livers were done by the UCLA Translational Pathology Core Laboratory.
Animals and diets
All animals (C57BL/6, greater than 10 generations backcrossed) were housed in a temperature-controlled room under a 12-h light/12-h dark cycle and pathogen-free conditions. For adenovirus experiments, aged-matched mice were purchased from Jackson Laboratories. Littermates were manually randomized to different treatment groups. Investigators were blinded to group allocation for some but not all studies. LXRα−/−, LXRβ−/− and LXRαβ−/− mice were originally provided by D. Mangelsdorf. Floxed Scap−/− mice were previously described29. LeXis global knockout mice were generated at UCDavis KOMP using strategy outlined in Extended Data Fig. 6. Mice were fed a chow diet except as indicated, where mice were placed on a Western diet (21% fat, 0.21% cholesterol; D12079B; Research Diets Inc.) or were gavaged with either vehicle or 40 mg kg−1 GW3965. Livers were obtained 4 h after the last gavage. We measured cholesterol and triglycerides as previously described30. For adenoviral infections, age-matched (9–11 weeks old) male mice were injected with 2.0 × 109 p.f.u. by tail-vein injection unless otherwise specified. Mice were euthanized 6 days later after a 6-h fast. At the time of euthanization, liver tissue and blood was collected by cardiac puncture and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C. Liver tissue was processed for isolation of RNA and protein as above. Generation 2.5 constrained ethyl ASOs, synthesized as described previously31, were administered by three 25 mg kg−1 intraperitoneal doses together with 40 mg kg−1 GW3965. Animals were euthanized on day 6 or 8 as indicated in figure legends. Most experiments were performed using male mice. All animal experiments were approved by the UCLA Institutional Animal Care and Research Advisory Committee.
Cell culture
Primary peritoneal macrophages were isolated 4 days after thioglycollate injection and prepared as described32. Mouse primary hepatocytes were isolated as previously described and cultured in William’s E medium with 5% FBS28. Peritoneal cells were incubated in 0.5% FBS in DMEM, with 5 μM simvastatin and 100 μM mevalonic acid. Five to eight hours later, cells were pretreated with dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) or appropriate ligand overnight. In vitro translation assay was performed using TnT Coupled Transcription/Translation System (PROMEGA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The cell lines HEK293T, HEK293A and Hepa1-6 were originally obtained from ATCC. All cells were tested for mycoplasma contamination.
RACE
The 5′ and 3′ ends of the LeXis transcript were defined using mouse liver RNA and the FirstChoice RLM-RACE kit (Ambion) according to manufacturer’s protocol, with modifications. In brief, for the 5′ RACE, degraded messenger RNA 5′ ends were dephosphorylated with CIP, and then full-length mRNA was decapped with TAP. Following 5′ RACE adaptor ligation, reverse transcription was performed using SuperScriptIII First-Strand Synthesis system (Invitrogen) and LeXis-specific primers. For the 3′ RACE, RNA was reverse transcribed using SuperScriptIII First-Strand Synthesis system (Invitrogen) and the adaptor-linked oligo dTs. The resulting cDNA was amplified by nested PCR across a 55–65 °C melting temperature gradient using KOD polymerase (Millipore), with the inner primers containing attB sequences. Aliquots of reactions were inspected on 1% agarose gels for product size and abundance. Products of select PCR reactions were purified using NucleoSpin Gel and PCR Cleanup kit (Clontech) and were inserted into pDONR221 by Gateway cloning. Cloned fragments were sequenced and then aligned to the mouse genome with the BLAST analysis tool.
RNA fractionation
The PAd/CMV-LeXis vector was transfected into Hepa1-6 cells using BioT reagent (Bioland Scientific LLC) and 24 h later subcellular RNA fractions were obtained according to the protocol described previously33. Lysate aliquots were inspected for fractional purity by western blotting with antibodies against α-tubulin, SNRP70 and histone H3 as cytoplasmic, nucleoplasmic and chromatin bound markers, respectively.
RNA-seq
RNA-seq libraries, starting with 500 ng total RNA, were constructed with the TruSeq RNA Sample Prep Kits from Illumina on RNA isolated from primary hepatocytes treated with or without GW3965. Samples were indexed with adapters and submitted for paired-end 2 × 100-bp sequencing in Illumina HiSeq2000. RNA-seq reads were aligned with TopHatv2.0.2 to the mouse genome, version mm9 (ref. 34). The TopHat alignment rate was 85%, resulting in an average of 65 million reads per sample. Transcripts were assessed and quantities were determined by Cufflinks v2.0.2, using a GTF file based on Ensembl mouse NCBI37. Comparison expression levels were made using fragments per kilobase of exon per million fragments mapped (FPKM) values using Cuffdiff from the Cufflinks package35. Data analysis was performed by UCLA DNA Microarray Core.
Lipid analysis
Tissue lipid was obtained using a Folch extraction. In brief, chloroform extracts were dried under nitrogen and solubilized in water. Tissue and serum cholesterol and triglycerides were determined using a commercially available enzymatic kit (Wako). Hepatic cholesterol content was normalized to liver weight and protein concentration. Mice were fasted for at least 6 h before blood collection and euthanization. Plasma lipoprotein fractions were analysed by FPLC.
Microarray
For cDNA microarray analysis, primary hepatocytes cells were treated as indicated above with either DMSO or GW3695. These samples were from an independent cohort from those submitted for RNA-seq. For each condition, two independent samples were processed. Transcriptional profiling was performed at the University of California, Los Angeles, microarray core facility by using Agilent SurePrint G3 Gene Expression array. Data were analysed using GeneSpring software (Agilent Technologies) and David36.
ChIP
ChIP studies were performed as described elsewhere37. In brief, mouse livers were cross-linked using a final formaldehyde concentration of 1% at room temperature for 10 min. The reaction was quenched with the addition of glycine. For sonication, 0.3 ml (1/3) of nuclear lysate was sonicated for 25–30 cycles, 30 s on 30 s off at 4 °C, with BioRuptor twin sonicator (Diagenode). Sonicated Chromatin was incubated overnight at 4 °C with control IgG or 25 μg of anti-LXRα antibody (PPZ0412, ChIP Ggade, Abcam), anti-RALY antibody (EPR10121, Abcam), or Pol II antibody (N-20, Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Protein A dynabeads (50 μl per immunoprecipitation sample) were added for 4 h. After incubation beads were washed with wash buffer A (50 mM HEPES, pH 7.9, 140 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100, 0.1% Na-deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, 1× protease inhibitors freshly added), buffer B (50 mM HEPES, pH 7.9, 500 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100, 0.1% Na-deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS) and finally LiCL buffer (20 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 250 mM LiCl, 1 mM EDTA, 0.5% Na-deoxycholate, 0.5% NP-40). Reverse crosslinking was performed at 60 °C overnight, mixed at 1,000 r.p.m., and DNA was extracted using a phenol–chloroform phase lock tube (5 PRIME) or Nucleospin PCR cleanup column (Macherey-Nagel). A standard curve for PCR was generated from serial dilutions of input samples and data expressed as percentage of input.
Chromatin isolation by RNA purification
Chromatin isolation by RNA purification (ChIRP) was performed as described previously18. In brief, mouse livers were cross-linked using glutaraldehyde. After glycine quenching, the nuclear lysate was sonicated for 25–30 cycles, 30 s on 30 s off at 4 °C, with BioRuptor twin sonicator (Diagenode). LeXis and LacZ pulldown probes with BiotinTEG at 3′ were designed by Biosearch Tecnologies (see Supplementary Information) and allowed to hybridize overnight with sonicated chromatin at 37 °C (100 pmol probe per 1 ml chromatin). After hybridization, C1 Dynabeads (Life Technologies) were added and incubated for 30 min. For protein elution for mass spectrometry analysis, washed beads were resuspended in 3× original volume of DNase buffer (100 mM NaCl and 0.1% NP-40), and protein was eluted with a cocktail of 50 mM triethyl ammonium bicarbonate, 12 mM sodium lauryl sarcosine, and 0.5% sodium deoxycholate supplemented with 100 μg ml−1 RNase A (Sigma-Aldrich) and 0.1 U μl−1 RNase H (Epicentre), and 100 U ml−1 DNase I (Invitrogen). For RNA isolation, beads were resuspended in protensase K buffer (100 mM NaCl, 10 mM TrisCl, pH 7.0, 1 mM EDTA, 0.5% SDS, 5% by volume proteainse K (AM2546, Ambion) 20 mg ml−1) and incubated at 50 °C followed by Trizol isolation and DNase treatment.
Single molecule RNA FISH
Custom Stellaris FISH probes were designed against LeXis. Stellaris probe set labelled with CAL Fluor Red 610 and RNA FISH performed as described previously38. In brief, hepatocytes were fixed with 3.7% formaldehyde in PBS followed by 70% ethanol treatment to permeabilize cells. Cells were washed with 10% formamide in 2× SCC followed by treatment in humidified chamber with addition of probes (125 nM) in hybridization buffer (100 mg ml−1 dextran sulfate and 10% formamide in 2× SSC). Cells were incubated in the dark at 37 °C for 4 h. DAPI nuclear stain (5 ng ml−1) was applied after washing with 10% formamide in 2× SCC. Images obtained using a Zeiss Z1 AxioObserver fluorescent microscope.
Statistical analysis
A non-paired Student’s t-test or ANOVA was used to determine statistical significance, defined at P < 0.05. Unless otherwise noted, error bars represent s.d.. Experiments were independently performed at least twice. Group sizes were based on statistical analysis of variance and prior experience with similar in vivo studies.
References
Tontonoz, P. Transcriptional and posttranscriptional control of cholesterol homeostasis by liver X receptors. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 76, 129–137 (2011)
Repa, J. J. et al. Regulation of mouse sterol regulatory element-binding protein-1c gene (SREBP-1c) by oxysterol receptors, LXRα and LXRβ. Genes Dev. 14, 2819–2830 (2000)
Zelcer, N., Hong, C., Boyadjian, R. & Tontonoz, P. LXR regulates cholesterol uptake through Idol-dependent ubiquitination of the LDL receptor. Science 325, 100–104 (2009)
Brown, M. S. & Goldstein, J. L. The SREBP pathway: regulation of cholesterol metabolism by proteolysis of a membrane-bound transcription factor. Cell 89, 331–340 (1997)
Zhang, Y. et al. Liver LXRα expression is crucial for whole body cholesterol homeostasis and reverse cholesterol transport in mice. J. Clin. Invest. 122, 1688–1699 (2012)
Creyghton, M. P. et al. Histone H3K27ac separates active from poised enhancers and predicts developmental state. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 21931–21936 (2010)
The ENCODE Project Consortium. An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature 489, 57–74 (2012)
Zelcer, N. & Tontonoz, P. Liver X receptors as integrators of metabolic and inflammatory signaling. J. Clin. Invest. 116, 607–614 (2006)
Vaisman, B. L. et al. ABCA1 overexpression leads to hyperalphalipoproteinemia and increased biliary cholesterol excretion in transgenic mice. J. Clin. Invest. 108, 303–309 (2001)
Horton, J. D., Goldstein, J. L. & Brown, M. S. SREBPs: activators of the complete program of cholesterol and fatty acid synthesis in the liver. J. Clin. Invest. 109, 1125–1131 (2002)
Matsuda, M. et al. SREBP cleavage-activating protein (SCAP) is required for increased lipid synthesis in liver induced by cholesterol deprivation and insulin elevation. Genes Dev. 15, 1206–1216 (2001)
Hong, C. et al. The LXR-Idol axis differentially regulates plasma LDL levels in primates and mice. Cell Metab. 20, 910–918 (2014)
Carpenter, S. et al. A long noncoding RNA mediates both activation and repression of immune response genes. Science 341, 789–792 (2013)
Yang, F., Zhang, H., Mei, Y. & Wu, M. Reciprocal regulation of HIF-1alpha and lincRNA-p21 modulates the Warburg effect. Mol. Cell 53, 88–100 (2014)
Raal, F. J. et al. Mipomersen, an apolipoprotein B synthesis inhibitor, for lowering of LDL cholesterol concentrations in patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 375, 998–1006 (2010)
Gaudet, D. et al. Targeting APOC3 in the familial chylomicronemia syndrome. N. Engl. J. Med. 371, 2200–2206 (2014)
Rinn, J. L. & Chang, H. Y. Genome regulation by long noncoding RNAs. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 81, 145–166 (2012)
Chu, C., Quinn, J. & Chang, H. Y. Chromatin isolation by RNA purification (ChIRP). J. Vis. Exp . 61, 3912 (2012)
Michaud, E. J., Bultman, S. J., Stubbs, L. J. & Woychik, R. P. The embryonic lethality of homozygous lethal yellow mice (Ay/Ay) is associated with the disruption of a novel RNA-binding protein. Genes Dev. 7, 1203–1213 (1993)
Jiang, W., Guo, X. & Bhavanandan, V. P. Four distinct regions in the auxiliary domain of heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein C-related proteins. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1399, 229–233 (1998)
Okamura, Y. et al. COXPRESdb in 2015: coexpression database for animal species by DNA-microarray and RNAseq-based expression data with multiple quality assessment systems. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, D82–D86 (2015)
Seo, Y. K. et al. Genome-wide localization of SREBP-2 in hepatic chromatin predicts a role in autophagy. Cell Metab. 13, 367–375 (2011)
Kelley, L. A., Mezulis, S., Yates, C. M., Wass, M. N. & Sternberg, M. J. The Phyre2 web portal for protein modeling, prediction and analysis. Nature Protocols 10, 845–858 (2015)
Auboeuf, D. et al. CoAA, a nuclear receptor coactivator protein at the interface of transcriptional coactivation and RNA splicing. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24, 442–453 (2004)
Rossi, A. et al. Genetic compensation induced by deleterious mutations but not gene knockdowns. Nature 524, 230–233 (2015)
Ulitsky, I., Shkumatava, A., Jan, C. H., Sive, H. & Bartel, D. P. Conserved function of lincRNAs in vertebrate embryonic development despite rapid sequence evolution. Cell 147, 1537–1550 (2011)
Sallam, T. et al. The macrophage LBP gene is an LXR target that promotes macrophage survival and atherosclerosis. J. Lipid Res. 55, 1120–1130 (2014)
Rong, X. et al. LXRs regulate ER stress and inflammation through dynamic modulation of membrane phospholipid composition. Cell Metab. 18, 685–697 (2013)
Tarling, E. J., Ahn, H. & de Aguiar Vallim, T. Q. The nuclear receptor FXR uncouples the actions of miR-33 from SREBP-2. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 35, 787–795 (2015)
Hong, C. et al. LXRα is uniquely required for maximal reverse cholesterol transport and atheroprotection in ApoE-deficient mice. J. Lipid Res. 53, 1126–1133 (2012)
Seth, P. P. et al. Short antisense oligonucleotides with novel 2′–4′ conformationaly restricted nucleoside analogues show improved potency without increased toxicity in animals. J. Med. Chem. 52, 10–13 (2009)
Bradley, M. N. et al. Ligand activation of LXR β reverses atherosclerosis and cellular cholesterol overload in mice lacking LXR α and apoE. J. Clin. Invest. 117, 2337–2346 (2007)
Bhatt, D. M. et al. Transcript dynamics of proinflammatory genes revealed by sequence analysis of subcellular RNA fractions. Cell 150, 279–290 (2012)
Trapnell, C., Pachter, L. & Salzberg, S. L. TopHat: discovering splice junctions with RNA-Seq. Bioinformatics 25, 1105–1111 (2009)
Trapnell, C. et al. Transcript assembly and quantification by RNA-Seq reveals unannotated transcripts and isoform switching during cell differentiation. Nature Biotechnol. 28, 511–515 (2010)
Huang, D. W., Sherman, B. T. & Lempicki, R. A. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nature Protocols 4, 44–57 (2009)
Carey, M. F., Peterson, C. L. & Smale, S. T. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP). Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 2009, pdb.prot5279 (2009)
Raj, A. & Tyagi, S. Detection of individual endogenous RNA transcripts in situ using multiple singly labeled probes. Methods Enzymol. 472, 365–386 (2010)
Acknowledgements
We thank members of the Tontonoz, Nagy, Smale and Black laboratories and the UCLA Atherosclerosis Research Unit for technical assistance and useful discussions. This work was support by NIH grants HL030568, HL066088, DK063491, HL128822, DK102559 and HL69766; American Heart Association grant 13POST17080115; American College of Cardiology Presidential CDA; and the UCLA Cardiovascular Discovery Fund (Lauren B. Leichtman and Arthur E. Levine Investigator Award).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
T.S. and P.T. conceived and designed the study, guided the interpretation of the results and the preparation of the manuscript. P.T. supervised the study and provided critical suggestions. T.S. and X.W. performed most mouse experiments and data analysis. M.C.J., T.G., L.Z., J.S., C.H., T.d.A.V. participated in mouse experiments and data analysis. T.S. performed RNA-seq experiments and validated LeXis as an LXR target. A.E. and D.C. processed and analysed next-generation sequencing data. M.C.J. performed and analysed the RACE experiments. J.W. performed the mass spectrometry analysis. M.K. and R.L. provided and independently validated ASOs targeting LeXis. T.S. and P.T. drafted the manuscript. T.S., M.C.J. and P.T. edited the manuscript with input from all authors. All authors discussed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Extended data figures and tables
Extended Data Figure 1 Identification of LeXis as an LXR-responsive lncRNA.
a, qPCR analysis of gene expression in livers from mice gavaged with 40 mg kg−1 GW3965 for 2 days. Mice were fasted for 4 h before collection (n = 4 per group). Values are mean ± s.e.m. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001 (unpaired two-tailed t-test). b, Volcano plot of RNA-seq results from primary hepatocytes treated for 16 h with 1 μM GW3965. c, Relative expression of selected LXR target genes identified in the RNA-seq study shown in b. Fold change represents ratio of transcript expression in GW3965 compared to DMSO treatment samples. Cut-off fold induction of 1.1 used (total 4,708 transcripts induced). d, Heat map representation of the results of transcriptional profiling (Agilent SurePrint G3 Gene Expression arrays) of primary hepatocytes treated with 1 μM GW3965 for 16 h. Data were analysed using GeneSpring software.
Extended Data Figure 2 Schematic of the LeXis gene locus and its RNA transcripts.
a, UCSC genome browser view of RNA-seq transcriptional signatures at the Abca1 and LeXis locus in mouse primary hepatocytes treated with 1 μM GW3965 for 16 h. b, Exon structure of major and minor LeXis transcripts identified by RACE, aligned for comparison to existing annotation in the indicated databases.
Extended Data Figure 3 Regulation of LeXis expression.
a, qPCR analysis of primary mouse hepatocytes from wild-type or double knockout (LXRα−/− and LXRβ−/−) mice treated with 1 μM GW3965 and/or 50 nM LG268. Results are representative of four independent experiments. b, LeXis expression in primary mouse hepatocytes from wild-type, LXRα−/−, LXRβ−/− or double knockout mice treated with GW3965 and LG268. Results are representative of three independent experiments. c, LeXis expression in primary hepatocytes treated with GW3965 and LG268 in the presence or absence of the protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide (Chx, 1 μg μl−1). Results are representative of three independent experiments. d, LeXis expression in primary hepatocytes treated with GW3965 and LG268 (50 nM) in the presence or absence of 25-hydroxycholesterol (25OH, 2.5 μM). Results are representative of three independent experiments. e, Gene expression in tissues from C57BL/6 mice gavaged with 40 mg kg−1 GW3965 for 3 days (n = 5 per group). *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001 (unpaired two-tailed t-test). f, Relative firefly luciferase activity measured from the pgl4.10 vector or pgl4.10 with the LeXis promoter cloned upstream of luciferase. Reporters were co-transfected in HEK293 cells and treated with GW3965 for 24 h. Activity is normalized to Renilla luciferase internal control. g, Analysis of LXRα binding to the LeXis promoter in mouse liver by ChIP-qPCR. Schematic shows primer pair positions relative to the LXR-response element in the LeXis and Abca1 (positive control) promoters. Primers flanking a region of the MAP kinase I promoter served as a negative control. ChIP values are presented as percentage of input DNA (n = 4 per group). Values are mean ± s.e.m. (e, g) or mean ± s.d. (a–d). h, Prediction of coding potential using the coding-non-coding index (CNCI) software. Negative value indicates low coding potential. i, Comparison of protein coding potential using coding potential calculator (CPC) score for LeXis, the non-coding gene HOTAIR, and control protein-coding transcripts. j, In vitro translation of LeXis and luciferase control RNAs.
Extended Data Figure 4 LeXis modulates the expression of genes liked to sterol synthesis.
a, Gene expression in livers obtained after 6 days of transduction with Ad-GFP or Ad-LeXis (n = 8 per group). b, Serum alanine aminotransferase activity in chow-fed mice transduced with Ad-GFP or Ad-LeXis for 6 days (n = 8 per group). c, Gene expression in livers obtained after 6 days of transduction with Ad-GFP or Ad-LeXis (n = 8 per group). d, Unbiased pathway analysis (GeneSpring software) of the results from transcriptional profiling of livers treated with Ad-GFP or Ad-LeXis (n = 4 per group). e, Hepatic cholesterol content normalized to liver mass in wild-type mice transduced with Ad-GFP or Ad-LeXis (n = 8 per group). f, Gene expression in mouse hepatocytes treated overnight with 1 μM GW3965. Results are representative of two independent experiments. g, Gene expression in mouse hepatocytes treated overnight with Ad-GFP or Ad-LeXis for 24 h. Results are representative of two independent experiments. h, Cholesterol levels in pooled fractionated serum from Ldlr−/− mice transduced with Ad-GFP or Ad-LeXis. i, Hepatic cholesterol content normalized to liver mass in Ldlr−/− mice transduced with Ad-GFP or Ad-LeXis (n = 8 per group). j, Gene expression in livers from chow-fed wild-type or liver-specific Scap−/− mice gavaged with 40 mg kg−1 GW3965 for 2 days (n = 5 (WT Veh), 8 (WT GW), 5 (KO Veh) and 7 (KO GW)). k, Gene expression in livers from Scap−/− chow-fed mice transduced with Ad-GFP or Ad-LeXis for 6 days (n = 5 per group). Values are mean ± s.e.m. (a–c, e, i–k) or mean ± s.d. (f, g). *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01 (unpaired two-tailed t-test).
Extended Data Figure 5 Inhibition of LeXis expression alters serum cholesterol level.
a, In vitro validation of LeXis knockdown using shLeXis1 and shLeXis8 vectors. Results are representative of three independent experiments. b, Total serum cholesterol measured in C57BL/6 mice fed 2 weeks of a Western diet and transduced with adenovirus shCtrl or shLeXis8 for 6 days (n = 6–8 per group). c, Cholesterol levels in pooled fractionated serum from mice transduced with shCtrl or shLeXis adenovirus. d, Total serum cholesterol from male C57BL/6 mice fed a Western diet for 2 weeks and then transduced with control (shCtrl) or adenoviral vectors expressing shRNA targeting LeXis (shLeXis1) (n = 8 per group). e, Hepatic cholesterol content normalized to liver mass for the mice shown in d (n = 8 (shCtrl) and 7 (shLeXis1)). f, Gene expression in livers of mice fed a Western diet for 2 weeks and then transduced with shCtrl or shLeXis (n = 8 (shCtrl) and 7 (shLeXis1)). g, Total plasma cholesterol levels in chow-fed C57BL/6 mice transduced with shCtrl or shLeXis adenovirus and gavaged with 40 mg kg−1 GW3965 for 6 days (n = 8 per group). h, Gene expression in livers of chow-fed C57BL/6 mice transduced with shCtrl or shLeXis adenovirus and gavaged with 40 mg kg−1 GW3965 for 6 days (n = 8 per group). i, Serum alanine aminotransferase activity from mice in h. j, Serum alanine aminotransferase activity from mice in d. k, Gene expression in livers of mice fed a Western diet for 2 weeks and then transduced with shCtrl or shLeXis (n = 8 (shCtrl) and 7 (shLeXis1)). l, Serum alanine aminotransferase activity from C57BL/6 mice on a chow diet administered 25 mg kg−1 ASOs intraperitoneally on days 1, 4 and 7, and gavaged with 40 mg kg−1 GW3965 on days 4, 7 and 8 (n = 5 per group). m, Total serum cholesterol from C57BL/6 mice on a chow diet administered 25 mg kg−1 ASOs intraperitoneally on days 1, 3 and 5, and gavaged with 40 mg kg−1 GW3965 on days 5 and 6 (n = 8 per group). Values are mean ± s.d. (a) or mean ± s.e.m. (f, h–m). *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001 (unpaired two-tailed t-test (b, d–h, j) and ANOVA with multi-group comparison (m)).
Extended Data Figure 6 Generation of global LeXis−/− mice.
a, Schematic of knockout strategy. Vector construct designed to ablate entire LeXis transcript. Targeted mice were crossed with Flp−/−(also known as Hpd−/−) mice to excise the Neo cassette since it contains an active bi-directional promoter. b, c, Gene expression (n = 3 per group) and PCR genotyping strategy for LeXis−/− mice. d, Gene expression from C57BL/6 wild-type or LeXis−/− mice fed on Western diet for 3 weeks (n = 11 (WT) and 7 (LeXis−/−)). All values are mean ± s.e.m. *P < 0.05 (unpaired two-tailed t-test).
Extended Data Figure 7 Identification of RALY as a LeXis-interacting protein.
a, Complimentary biotin-labelled tiling oligonucleotides incubated with cellular extracts from liver. Probes sets designed to retrieve LeXis (Lex 1 and 2) or LacZ (LacZ 1 and 2). Percentage input of retrieved LeXis and 36B4 are shown (n = 4 per group). b, Cellular contents separated into cytoplasmic soluble (C), nuclear soluble (N) and insoluble (pellet, P) fractions were analysed by western blotting with anti-RALY and anti-histone H3 antibodies. c, Antibodies were incubated with cellular lysates from mouse hepatocytes and interaction with endogenous RALY was assessed after immunoprecipitation and western blot. d, Complexes from b were analysed for presence of LeXis or Gapdh by reverse transcription qPCR (RT–qPCR) and signals were normalized to 36B4 (n = 4 per group). e, Sequence alignment, predicted secondary structure, and 3D model of RALY are shown as reported using the Phyre2 (Protein Homology/analogueY Recognition Engine V 2.0) web portal. f, Western blot for RALY from livers transduced with adenoviral vectors expressing control shRNA (shCtrl) or Raly shRNA (shRaly) (n = pooled 4 animals per group). g, Gene expression from liver from 14-week-old chow-fed male C57BL/6 mice transduced with control (shCtrl) or shRaly (n = 8 per group). Values are mean ± s.d. (a) or mean ± s.e.m. (g).
Extended Data Figure 8 Knockdown of RALY preferentially affects pathways link to cholesterol metabolism in mouse liver.
a, b, Most significant Gene Ontology terms from microarray analysis from livers treated with shCtrl or shRaly. Analysis performed using GeneSpring and DAVID.
Extended Data Figure 9 RALY is required for LeXis mediated effects on cholesterogenesis.
a, Total serum cholesterol levels in Ldlr−/− mice transduced with shCtrl or shRaly for 6 days (n = 8 (shCtrl) and 7 (shRaly)). b, Gene expression from liver obtained from Ldlr−/− mice transduced with shCtrl or shRaly for 6 days (n = 8 (shCtrl) and 7 (shRaly)). c, Gene expression from C57BL/6 mice transduced with control (Ad-GFP) or Ad-LeXis (1.0 × 109 p.f.u.) and shCtrl or shRaly (2.0 × 109 p.f.u.) (n = 7 (ctrl/shCtrl and LeXis/shRaly) and 8 (LeXis/shCtrl and Ctrl/shRaly)). d, Recruitment of RALY in promoter regions as determined by ChIP analysis in livers transduced with control (Ad-GFP) or Ad-LeXis. Data expressed as percentage input retrieved normalized to an upstream site (region 1) (n = 3 per group). Values are mean ± s.e.m. (b, c) or mean ± s.d. (d). *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001 (unpaired two-tailed t-test (a, b) and ANOVA with multi-group comparison (c)).
Extended Data Figure 10 Batch genome conversion between mouse and human at LeXis gene locus.
Gene expression for putative human non-coding RNA TCONS_00016452 in hepatocyte cell lines treated with 1 μM GW3965 (n = 3 per group). Values are mean ± s.d. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001 (unpaired two-tailed t-test).
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
This file contains the uncropped scans with size marker indications and primer sequences. (PDF 879 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sallam, T., Jones, M., Gilliland, T. et al. Feedback modulation of cholesterol metabolism by the lipid-responsive non-coding RNA LeXis. Nature 534, 124–128 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature17674
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature17674
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Downregulation of hepatic lncRNA Gm19619 improves gluconeogenesis and lipogenesis following vertical sleeve gastrectomy in mice
Communications Biology (2023)
-
High cholesterol intake remodels cholesterol turnover and energy homeostasis in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus)
Marine Life Science & Technology (2023)
-
Downregulation of MEIS1 mediated by ELFN1-AS1/EZH2/DNMT3a axis promotes tumorigenesis and oxaliplatin resistance in colorectal cancer
Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy (2022)
-
Long non-coding RNAs regulate fatty acid and cholesterol metabolism
Genome Instability & Disease (2022)
-
Hypothalamic long noncoding RNA AK044061 is involved in the development of dietary obesity in mice
International Journal of Obesity (2021)