Main

We first sought to replicate BMT-mediated rescue of male mice derived from the same Mecp2tm1.1Jae/y colony used in the original report4, implementing established standards for conducting preclinical studies2,6. Mice were maintained on a C57Bl/6J background, which was confirmed in recipient animals by genome scanning (see Supplementary Information). Four-week-old Mecp2tm1.1Jae/y mice and wild-type littermates were subjected to the same protocol of lethal split-dose γ-irradiation. Mice were then randomized to receive tail vein injection of bone marrow from Mecp2-deficient male littermates or from Mecp2-proficient animals, including C57Bl/6J male mice ubiquitously expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP) and Mecp2+/y littermates of the recipients. All animals achieved multilineage peripheral blood engraftment as judged by the fraction of donor-derived GFP-expressing cells in peripheral blood 4 and 8 weeks after transplant (Extended Data Fig. 1a). PCR analysis of blood and tail tissue 4 weeks after transplant also confirmed expression of the appropriate mutant or wild-type variant of Mecp2 in blood in all groups (Extended Data Fig. 1b). Microglial engraftment in brain parenchyma 30 and 90 days after transplant was similar in mutant and wild-type recipients engrafted with marrow from wild-type mice ubiquitously expressing a GFP transgene (Fig. 1a, b and Extended Data Fig. 1c), and comparable to engraftment observed by Derecki et al.4 and others7.

Figure 1: Early transplantation of wild-type microglia into the brain does not rescue Mecp2-null mice.
figure 1

a, Transplantation of bone marrow from C57BL/6 (Mecp2+/y-GFP marrow) mice with ubiquitous GFP transgene expression into Mecp2tm1.1Jae/y mice confers robust donor engraftment at the indicated time after transplant (30 or 90 days) shown via immunohistochemical detection of GFP-positive cells of microglial morphology in entorhinal cortex and hippocampus, in both the Mecp2+/y-GFP donors to Mecp2tm1.1Jae/y recipient (right panels) and to Mecp2+/y recipient (left panels) groups. Original magnification, ×400. b, Double immunofluorescent labelling with GFP and the microglia marker Iba1 in cerebellar tissue from Mecp2+/y-GFP donors to Mecp2tm1.1Jae/y recipient mice examined 30 days after BMT confirms early microglial engraftment in brain parenchyma. Quantification of microglial engraftment is shown in Extended Data Fig. 1c. ch, No differences in survival were noted between transfer of Mecp2+/y to Mecp2-null (Mecp2−/y) mice and of Mecp2-null to Mecp2-null mice, indicating that engraftment of wild-type microglia into the brains of Mecp2-null mice did not protect Mecp2-null mice from premature death. In addition, no differences in survival were noted between transfer of Mecp2-null to Mecp2+/y mice and of Mecp2+/y to Mecp2+/y mice, indicating that engraftment of Mecp2-null microglia into the brains of wild-type mice does not shorten survival as seen in Mecp2-null mice. NS, not significant. i, No differences were seen in other outcome measures at 12 weeks of age (8 weeks after BMT) between Mecp2+/y to Mecp2tm1.1Jae/y (also termed Mecp2−/y) mice (n = 31) and Mecp2tm1.1Jae/y to Mecp2tm1.1Jae/y mice (n = 25), including weight, frequency of breathing apneas, locomotor activity (beam breaks), general condition, walking gait, tremor, hindlimb clasping or neurological score. Here, data are presented as relative outcome measure (mean and s.d. for each measure were calculated, and values were divided by the mean value for the Mecp2tm1.1Jae/y to Mecp2tm1.1Jae/y transplantation mice). Specific values obtained for Mecp2tm1.1Jae/y to Mecp2tm1.1Jae/y mice and Mecp2+/y to Mecp2tm1.1Jae/y mice are as follows: weight (in g) (18.22 ± 0.93 versus 18.96 ± 0.8); apneas per 15 min (35.4 ± 5.96 versus 35.2 ± 5.24); beam breaks per 12 h (3,729.2 ± 253.3 versus 4,330.2 ± 305.2); general condition score (0.52 ± 0.1 versus 0.35 ± 0.1); walking gait score (0.24 ± 0.087 versus 0.23 ± 0.076); tremor score (0.24 ± 0.087 versus 0.13 ± 0.061); hindlimb clasping score (0.48 ± 0.12 versus 0.29 ± 0.083); neurological score (1.48 ± 0.29 versus 1.0 ± 0.2). None of the differences were statistically significant.

PowerPoint slide

Contrary to our expectation, Mecp2tm1.1Jae/y mice that received Mecp2+/y marrow had no extension of lifespan compared to Mecp2tm1.1Jae/y marrow recipients (Fig. 1c). No difference in survival was observed in mutant animals that received Mecp2+/y marrow from wild-type littermates or C57Bl/6J animals ubiquitously expressing GFP (Extended Data Fig. 1d). We also observed no benefit in outcome measures at 12 weeks of age, 8 weeks after transplant, including weight, breathing, locomotion, general condition, walking gait, tremor, hindlimb clasping or neurological score (Fig. 1i). Thus, the same BMT procedure with substantially greater numbers of animals, randomly assigned to treatment group, with mice from the same Mecp2tm1.1Jae/y colony did not replicate any aspects of the protective effect reported by Derecki et al.4. Furthermore, histological analysis blind to genotype and treatment group showed no neuropathological evidence of differential apoptosis, microglial response, or tissue degeneration between experimental groups (Extended Data Fig. 1e). There was also no protective effect on survival after BMT in two additional mouse models of Rett syndrome (Fig. 1e, g): Mecp2LucHyg/y mice that contain a Mecp2-firefly luciferase/hygromycin-resistance gene fusion (Extended Data Fig. 2a–e) and Mecp2R168X/y mice8, despite excellent engraftment after BMT (Extended Data Fig. 2f–h). Experiments with these two models were performed in independent laboratories following the same BMT protocol4.

In all models, wild-type mice transplanted with wild-type bone marrow showed no mortality, indicating that the procedure was well tolerated (Fig. 1c, e, g). Likewise, BMT was well-tolerated by mutant animals, as Mecp2 mutant animals receiving mutant marrow exhibited either no change (Mecp2LucHyg/y and Mecp2R168X/y mice), or, surprisingly, slightly reduced mortality (Mecp2tm1.1Jae/y mice) compared to naive mice not subjected to BMT (Fig. 1d, f, h). The small survival extension may be related to a salutary effect of post-irradiation antibiotic treatment of transplanted animals, to which naive animals were not exposed, or to differences in animal handling9.

To address the role for microglia in Rett syndrome reported by Derecki et al.4 further, we used the Cre/lox system and a lox-stop-lox allele of Mecp2 (Mecp2LSL, referred to as Mecp2lox–stop/y in ref. 4) to examine the effect of genetically driven expression of Mecp2 in microglia during development (see Supplementary Information for full Methods details). First, we analysed the suitability of the LysM-Cre transgene (Lysmcre in ref. 4; Lysm is also known as Lyz2), which was used by Derecki et al.4 in their genetic Mecp2LSL/y rescue experiments4, to drive efficient microglia-specific gene restoration. As previously reported10, LysM-Cre-driven dTomato reporter cells accounted for less than 25% of microglia, as assessed using flow cytometry of microglia derived from mice containing the LysM-Cre transgene and a transgene expressing Cre-dependent dTomato (Extended Data Fig. 3a). Furthermore, when we generated LysM-Cre; Mecp2LSL/Y mice (termed Mecp2lox–stop/yLysmcre in ref. 4), we observed MeCP2 expression in neurons (large NeuN+ cells) in many brain regions (Extended Data Fig. 3b).

To identify a Cre transgenic line that drives efficient expression within microglia, we next evaluated the Vav1-Cre transgene, which selectively expresses throughout the haematopoietic compartment11. In contrast to LysM-Cre, the Vav1-Cre transgene targeted microglia with high efficiency (Fig. 2a) and specificity (Fig. 2b). As Vav1-Cre-driven expression in brain proved to be efficient and restricted to microglia, we applied this system to test whether expression of Mecp2 in microglia rescues Mecp2-null mice. To quantify Mecp2 restoration in microglia, we used the fms-GFP transgene, the expression of which within brain is restricted to microglia, for flow sorting11 (Extended Data Fig. 3c). Microglia derived from Vav1-Cre; Mecp2LSL/Y animals expressed Mecp2 messenger RNA at 75% of the level of Mecp2 mRNA in microglia derived from Mecp2+/Y animals (Fig. 2c). Similar to other Mecp2-null mouse models, Mecp2LSL/Y animals showed hypoactivity, poor motor coordination on parallel rod walking, increased basal and hypoxia breathing rate, increased frequency of apneas, and early death, none of which was improved by Mecp2 expression in microglia of Vav1-Cre; Mecp2LSL/Y animals (Fig. 2d–h). We thus conclude that driving Mecp2 expression developmentally in microglia did not ameliorate the phenotype of Mecp2-null mice, in contrast to the data reported by Derecki et al.4.

Figure 2: Genetic reconstitution of Mecp2 in microglia does not rescue Mecp2-null mice.
figure 2

a, b, Evaluation of efficiency and specificity of Vav1-Cre in microglia. a, Representative flow sorting of microglia derived from brains from Vav1-Cre; Rosa26:LSL:tdTomato mice shown on left, with quantification (n = 3) of cells that express both fluorescent reporter (tdTomato) and microglia marker (CD45) shown on right. SSC, side scatter. b, Histological characterization of tdTomato expression in brain from Vav1-Cre; Rosa26:LSL:tdTomato. Top left, low-power image of a mid-sagittal section; bottom left, higher power image of cortex. Right, individual colour channels contributing to merged image (bottom left). Arrows indicate microglia expressing tdTomato (Iba1+/tdTomato+). Scale bars, 5 mm (low power) and 50 μm (high power). c, Quantitative PCR (qPCR) results of Mecp2 expression from flow-sorted microglia derived from wild-type (WT; n = 2), Mecp2LSL/Y (NR; n = 2) and Vav1-CreTg/+; Mecp2LSL/Y (RESC; n = 3) animals. d, Distance travelled in open field assay. CRE denotes Vav1-CreTg/+ mice. e, Number of footslips per distance travelled on parallel rods. f, Breathing rate at baseline and during hypoxia challenge. g, Number of apneas per 10,000 breaths. h, Survival curve. In dh, WT n = 8; CRE n = 10; NR n = 12; RESC n = 13. Data are mean and s.e.m. *P < 0.05. Statistical analyses in cg analysed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with post-hoc pairwise t-test with Bonferroni correction, and in h, Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was used.

PowerPoint slide

In conclusion, our experiments do not support BMT as therapy for Rett syndrome. We observe no benefit of BMT-mediated delivery of wild-type microglia into the brains of three different preclinical models of Rett syndrome, nor do we observe a causative role of microglia in the disease process. Our BMT studies included large numbers of mice derived from the same parent colony used in the original report4, with treatment assigned randomly and analysis conducted blind to genotype and treatment group. Finally, we showed that even early and highly efficient genetically driven Mecp2 expression in the microglia of Mecp2-null mice conferred no protective effect. Restoration of MECP2 in microglia through either BMT or genetics did not rescue the major observed phenotypes in Rett syndrome, which argues against the previously proposed therapeutic potential of BMT in patients with Rett syndrome4.