Abstract
The objective of this work was to describe the status of the assemblages of soil nematodes associated with tomato crops, in a major tomato production area in Argentina, by studying ecological indices of nematode food web and determining which indices describe alterations in horticultural soils. Three agroecosystem types were compared: agroecological, conventional with organic amendments, and conventional with methyl bromide (MeBr) application. A pristine site without anthropogenic intervention was also studied. Abundance, frequency, diversity indices, maturity indices, trophic groups, colonizer-persister values (cp), and guilds of nematodes were analyzed and compared statistically between the sampling sites. The most abundant genera in the agroecosystems were Rhabditis, Helicotylenchus, and Filenchus belonging to the guilds bacterivorous (Ba1), plant feeders (Pl3), and fungivorous (Fu2). Within agroecosystems, the agroecological site showed the highest values of diversity and maturity, while the lowest values were found in the site treated with MeBr. Trophic groups, cp, guilds, and the indices provided useful information on the state of maturity and enrichment that effectively contrasted and differentiated the practices of horticultural management. This updated report of the nematode fauna constitutes one of the most important for the horticultural region of La Plata considering the scarcity of studies on this subject.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Soil is the fundamental system in which agricultural production is maintained and where soil inhabitants provide vital ecosystem services (Bardgett and Van der Putten 2014). However, agroecosystems are generally characterized by having periodic perturbations due to management practices, thus altering the soil structure and influencing the faunal communities (Timper 2014). Agriculture worldwide uses a large percentage of the energy available on our planet, which is considered non-renewable energy and is directly related to greenhouse gas emissions (Platis et al. 2019). This issue is summarized in the use of fertilizers to increase crop yields, affecting the structure of communities of edaphic organisms; and pesticides: their use, continuously increasing, is considered a solution for pest control, without clearly determining the effect they have on accompanying organisms within agroecosystems (Yang et al. 2019, Zaller and Brühl 2019). The main objectives to face these problems must take into account the implementation of practices that are friendly to the environment and develop integral fertilization systems through organic amendments and share and integrate the concept of biological control within all the entities involved in the development of agricultural practices (Quiroz and Céspedes 2019, Wyckhuys et al. 2018). In order to measure and evaluate the impact that anthropic interventions have on soil ecosystems, the development of environmental indicators is necessary. Bioindicators are organisms whose responses to disturbances in the environment can be measured and evaluated using indices of diversity, similarity, and community comparison indices, indicating the biotic and abiotic state of the ecosystem (Gerhardt 2002).
Nematodes are cosmopolitan organisms, found in large abundances and biodiversity in soil. They are involved in nutrient cycles through feeding on microorganisms, and the extent of their functioning is affected by environmental changes and by biological interactions and in the food web, they have specific roles classified into trophic groups and functional guilds (bacterivorous, herbivorous, fungivorous, omnivorous, and predatory nematodes) (Sánchez-Moreno and Talavera 2013). Considering these features, soil nematode abundance, diversity, and role in the trophic web can serve as bioindicators reflecting changes in agroecosystems (Bongers 1999; Neher 2001, 2010; Ferris 2010; Gnamkoulamba et al. 2018). The main parameters studied in order to characterize the soil nematode communities are species abundance and diversity (Sattler et al. 2010). Notwithstanding, such parameters themselves do not explain the effects of pollution in the environment. Therefore, some ecological indices have been proposed, as the maturity index (MI), structural index (SI), enrichment index (EI), and channel index (CI), diversity of Shannon-Weaver (H´), dominance of Simpson, and uniformity of Pielou (J´). These indices reveal descriptive and qualitative information on the soil nematode community and the conditions of the natural and/or agricultural systems (Bongers 1990; Ferris et al. 2001).
In the Province of Buenos Aires, Argentina, horticulture is one of the main agricultural activities, with the highest concentration of production in the La Plata area. This zone with about 5000 ha, cultivated mostly with conventional intensive agricultural systems, contributes 60% of the tomato production consumed at a national level (Ferratto et al. 2010). The agricultural practices alter the structure and characteristics of the community of nematodes in distinguishable patterns, forming networks of nematodes of different structures and composition. Using this framework, the objective of this work was to describe the status of the assemblages of soil nematodes associated with tomato crops, in a major tomato production area in Argentina, by studying ecological indices of nematode food webs to determine those that best describe the alterations suffered in horticultural soils.
2 Materials and Methods
2.1 Study Area
The study area was constituted by orchards associated mainly with tomato cultivation located in the horticultural area of La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina (Fig. 1). The sampling sites were characterized and defined according to the diversity and rotation of crops, the use of organic and inorganic fertilizers, and the application of biocides at the moment prior to the start of data collection (Table 1).
Agroecological site (S1): tomato crop (Solanum lycopersicum var. Platense) with infiltration irrigation (or channels), in which no type of agrochemical input is used. The crop rotation and the conservation of spontaneous weeds are part of the premises of these producers, who seek, increasing the diversity of species to reduce the appearance of organisms considered crop pest. At the beginning of the spring season, the land of the ridges is prepared by removing the weeds with a chisel plow. In the middle of the spring, the tomato seedlings are transplanted. During this season, the spontaneous weed (Matricaria recutita and Silybum marianum) is allowed to grow. In the summer, the crop is characterized by the presence of tomato plants (Solanum lycopersicum var. platense) and broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italica). In the autumn, leeks (Allium ampeloprasum var. Porrum), and scallions (Allium fistulosum L.) are sown. During this season and until half-two of the winter season, the ridges were partially covered by weeds such as purslane (Portulaca oleracea) and thistles (Fam. Asteraceae). In late winter, the land was prepared to sow cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. Capitata), broccoli, and tomato. Soil sampling in this site was carried out for two seasons between spring 2015 and summer 2017.
Conventional site (S2): tomato crop (Solanum lycopersicum var. platense) under cover with drip irrigation. In this system, the use of organic amendments of the Brassicaceae family is applied two times per year as a method of fertilizing the soil based on organic nitrogen, in order to seek alternatives to the use of commercial inputs. Towards the end of the winter, the producers add the preparation of organic amendments (approximately 50 kg per crop ridge). At the beginning of the spring, the land is prepared by conventional plowing and the tomato transplant (Solanum lycopersicum var. platense) is carried out. At the end of summer, the second fertilization is applied after harvest, to prepare a second tomato crop during autumn and winter with crop rotation (Solanum lycopersicum var. elpida). Soil sampling in this site was carried out for two seasons between spring 2015 and summer 2017.
Intensive conventional site (S3): tomato crop (Solanum lycopersicum) under cover with drip irrigation and application of nematicides and nitrogen fertilization. Methyl bromide (MeBr) is applied as a soil disinfection method (nematicide) in order to control Nacobbus aberrans, the main genus of pest phytonematodes in the region. The application of MeBr (32 g/m3) is made at the end of each winter season; then, the greenhouse is closed to prevent the access of people and animals. At the beginning of the spring of the same year, the soil is fertilized (100 kg ha−1 N-NO3−) and tomato seedlings are transplanted (Solanum lycopersicum var. platense). At the end of the summer, the harvest is finished, the land is prepared, and in the autumn and winter season, tomato are transplanted again (Solanum lycopersicum var. elpida and var. cerasiforme). Soil sampling in this site was carried out for two seasons between the ends of spring 2016 and summer 2018.
Pristine site (S4): forest located in the biosphere reserve of Pereyra Iraola Park without any anthropic intervention of any kind, which allowed to collect data from a stable system over time, without structural changes in the soil profile. The physiognomy of this site is characterized by the presence of trees of the genus Quercus, Pinus, Cupressus, and temperate grasslands (fam. Poaceae) which have a high degree of coverage (between 80 and 90%). This physiognomy did not change in the running of the samples. Sampling began during the winter of 2016 and culminated during the autumn season of 2018.
2.2 Obtaining Soil Samples
In order to monitor the edaphic nematode communities, soil sampling was carried out in eight instances every 3 months for each site between spring 2014 and summer 2018. In each of the four sites, a sampling plot of 15 × 30 m was delimited, taking two composite samples consisting of 20 cores (30 cm deep) with a soil auger in a Z-pattern, in the tomato plants’ rhizosphere. Each composite sample was deposited in a bag protecting it from direct sunlight and labeled. In the laboratory, each composite sample was screened and homogenized before being stored in a refrigerator at 4 °C for further analysis.
2.3 Extraction, Identification, and Analysis of the Nematode Community
For the isolation of nematodes, 100 cm3 of soil were taken from each sample and centrifuged, dissolved in water for 3 min at 3000 rpm to eliminate unwanted material that makes it difficult to observe specimens. The resulting supernatant containing residual organic matter was discarded. The decanted material was homogenized again in a sucrose solution (484 g sucrose/L H2O) and centrifuged for 3 min at 3000 rpm (Caveness and Jensen 1955). The supernatant with nematodes in suspension was poured into screens with a 40-μm opening, collecting and depositing the specimens in a final solution of 25 ml: 22 ml of water and 3 ml of TAF (triethanolamine 2% (v/v) and formalin to 7% (v/v) in distilled water). From this final suspension, five random aliquots of 1 ml were taken for the nematode count. The final number of nematodes found was extrapolated to reach the volume of the initial solution (25 ml). Nematodes were identified to genus using the key of Heyns 1971, Manzanilla-López and Marbán-Mendoza 2012 and Chaves et al. 2019. The taxonomic determination was made at 40–100× using a stereoscopic magnifying glass (Hokenn Optik model ZTX E ZOOM) and a stereoscopic microscope (Leica model DM-500). In cases where it was not possible to identify individuals at the genus level, they were located at the family level.
2.4 Structure and Diversity Indices
In each sampling site, the abundance values of nematodes were used for the indices of structure and diversity of the ecosystem. For the calculation of the function indices, the nematodes had to be classified based on the diverse characteristics they present within an ecosystem: whether they are opportunistic colonizer or persistents sensitive to environmental disturbances (value of cp proposed by Bongers 1990); whether they feed on bacteria, fungi, plants, or other nematodes (trophic group, Yeates et al. 1993); and on the basis of what function they fulfill (ecological functional guilds, Ferris et al. 2001). The indices calculated were relative abundance (%) = ns/Ntotal × 100 (where ns is the number of individuals of a given genus and N the total number of individuals in a sample); frequency (%) = 100 × (number of samples where a certain genus was present)/(number of total samples examined); genus richness (S): number of genera present in each sampling site; Margalef’s richness index (Dmg) = S−1/ln N (where S indicates the number of genera and N the total number of individuals in a sample); the Shannon-Weaver diversity index (H′) = – ΣSi = 1pi·log2 (pi) (where pi is the total individuals’ abundance of each genus i that contributes to total diversity); and Pielou Index (J′) = H′/H′max (where H′max = ln S) (Norton 1978). The analysis of ecological index values was carried out using the PRIMER software (Plymouth Routines Multivariate Ecological Research, version 6) (Clarke and Gorley 2001). Nematodes can behave as colonizing or persistent organisms thus reflecting changes in the soil they inhabit. Based on these characteristics, Bongers (1990) assigned families of nematode values of 1–5 on a scale of colonizer-persister (cp). The cp 1 nematodes have short life cycles and are tolerant of environmental disturbances, they are considered colonizers and dominant in soil samples with anthropic intervention. The cp 2 nematodes have longer life cycles and less fertility than cp 1; they are very tolerant against polluting conditions indicating polluted soils. The cp 3, cp 4, and cp 5 nematodes have even longer life cycles than the previous categories and are considered persistent nematodes of great sensitivity to adverse conditions. The cp category for plant feeder nematodes (pp) takes values from 2 to 5 (pp 2–5). This differentiation is used to more adequately interpret the behavior of this group since its adaptive strategies against environmental changes depend to a greater extent on the availability of host plants and not on the state of the soil itself. Ferris et al. (2001) defined functional guild as an assembly of species with biological attributes and responses to similar environmental conditions and classified it as the most robust and informative category for the analysis of nematode communities. This category combines the trophic group of nematodes with their value on the cp scale, forming 16 known functional guilds: bacterivorous with cp 1–4 value (Ba1–4), plant feeders with cp 2–5 value (Pl 2–5), fungivorous with cp 2–4 (Fu 2–4), predators with cp 3–5 value (Pr 3–5), and omnivore nematodes with cp 4–5 value (Om 4–5). Using the NINJA (Nematode INdicator Joint Analysis) software (Sieriebriennikov et al. 2014), maturity indices were determined: maturity index (MI) = Σ (vi × fi)/n (where vi = colonizer-persister value (cp) (assigned to the family, fi = frequency of family i in the sample, n = total number of individuals in a sample); plant-parasitic index (PPI); MI 2–5; ΣMI; and indices based on functional guilds, Enrichment Index (EI), Structure Index (SI), Channel Index (CI), and Basal Index (BI) (Neher, 2001; Neher and Darby 2009). Maturity indices were computed separately from free-living and plant-feeder nematodes.
To compare the different measurements between the sites, an analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used and the data was transformed to Log (x + 1). When the data did not meet the normality criterion, the Kruskal-Wallis test was used. If significant differences were found, post hoc analyses were performed with the HSD method of Tukey with a level of significance of 5%.
3 Results
A total of 47 taxa within 24 families of nematodes were found at the four sampling sites. Among them, 42 were determined at the genus level, while 5 taxa were identified at the family level. In S1, the relative abundances, expressed in percentage, were higher for the genus Helicotylenchus, doubling the value of abundance found for the second and third genus (Tylenchus and Cruznema, respectively). These three genera contributed to approximately 50% of the total nematodes. Rhabditis and Filenchus were the following genera surpassing 5% of relative abundance. Tylenchus, Filenchus, Mesorhabditis, and Panagrolaimus presented a frequency of 100% for this site (Table 2). In S2, the genera Rhabditis, Helicotylenchus, Rhabditidae (unknown genus), and Mesorhabditis were the most abundant, representing, overall, more than 60% of the relative abundance of the total genera in this community. In this site, the frequency analysis of these first three groups was 100% while for Mesorhabditis, it was 87.5% (Table 2). In S3, it was determined that the largest relative abundances were those presented by the genera Rhabditis, Nacobbus, Rhabditidae (unknown genus), and Mesorhabditis, the sum of their values reaching more than 70% of the relative abundance of the total genera analyzed for this site. Coinciding with the most abundant genus, Rhabditis was also the most frequent, reaching 100% in the total number of samples together with Mesorhabditis (Table 2). The genera that showed the greatest abundance in S4 were Helicotylenchus, Filenchus, and Tylenchus, adding up to a percentage of relative abundance exceeding 70% of the total; reaching the same genera a frequency of 100% (together with Aphelenchus and Acrobeles). The fact that these three genera have the highest values of abundance and frequency evidences an apparent dominance of these genera at the site without anthropic intervention (Table 2).
3.1 Trophic Groups
The morphological characterization of the main structures of the digestive system allowed to differentiate the five known trophic groups. The results of the study in this category showed that the highest average abundance of bacterivorous was found in conventional with MeBr and organic amendments (831.9 and 559.38 indv/100 cm3, respectively). The plant parasites were found in a greater proportion in pristine than the agroecological site (1087.5 and 405 indv/100 cm3, respectively). The fungivorous nematodes presented an average abundance of 702.5 indv/100 cm3 in pristine site. Due to the few specimens of predators and omnivores found in each site, their respective abundances were added, finding the highest values of this category in the pristine site (42.5 indv/100 cm3) (Fig. 2). The results of the analysis of variance (ANOVA) found significant differences for the trophic groups of bacterivorous and plant parasites (Fig. 2). Within the plant-feeder category, significant differences were found between those nematodes considered sedentary parasites represented by Nacobbus (p = 0.0249) between pairs of sites S3–S1 and S3–S4, and semi-endoparasites represented almost exclusively by Helicotylenchus between the pairs of sites S1–S2, S3–S4, and S2–S4.
3.2 Colonizer-Persister Scale
The result of the analysis of the adaptive characteristics of the edaphic nematodes determined representatives of the five categories of colonizer-persister proposed by Bongers (1990) to understand the life strategies that these organisms present in the different ecosystems. The result showed that the higher cp 1 average abundance was found in the S3 and S2 crops (805 indv/100 cm3 and 500 indv/100 cm3 respectively); in S4, the highest values of cp 2 (763.75 indv/100 cm3) and cp 3–5 (46.25 indv/100 cm3) were observed. For categories cp 1 and cp 2, significant differences were found between the sites corresponding to the agroecosystems vs the pristine site (Fig. 3). In the pp category of plant feeders, only pp 2 and pp 3 representatives were observed. The result of the global analysis of herbivorous nematodes revealed 74.85% of pp 3 and 25.15% of pp 2, and no significant differences were found for these groups among the different sites.
3.3 Functional Guilds
No significant differences were found for average abundance of Ba1 guild between the sites; however, the greatest values of this guild (805 indv/100 cm3) was found in the crop treated with MeBr, being the dominant guild for this site and its lowest value was found in the pristine site (55 indv/100 cm3) (Fig. 4). Between S4 and the three types of horticultural crops, significant differences were found with respect to the abundances of the guilds Pl3 and Fu2 (p = 0.0114 and p = 0.0124 respectively). For the guild Pl2, significant differences were found (p = 0.0003) between S4–S2 and S3 (Fig. 4).
3.4 Structure Indices of the Community
The results of the analysis of nematode communities showed no significant differences in the number of individuals (N), with the highest values recorded in S4 and the lowest values in S1 (Table 3). Between the S3 and S4 sites, significant differences were found in the number of genera (S) (p = 0.0301), while Margalef’s richness index (Dmg) and the Shannon-Weaver diversity index (H′) showed significant differences (p = 0.0352 and p = 0.0197 respectively) between crops S1 and S3 (Table 3). The Pielou equitability index did not show significant differences between the sites, observing their highest average and maximum value in the agroecological crops (Table 3).
3.5 Ecosystem Function Indices
The statistical analyses found no significant differences for the variables PPI and MI 2–5 (Table 3). The highest average and maximum values for the PPI were observed in the conventional treated crops (S2 and S3). Regarding MI 2–5, the highest average value was determined for S3 without observing large differences with respect to the other sites analyzed. With respect to the MI, the statistical analyses found significant differences between the S2–S4 and S3–S4 sites (p = 0.0009). ΣMI also showed significant differences between S3 and S4 (p = 0.0064). For the indices of the food web EI, CI, and BI, significant differences were determined between S4 and the rest of the horticultural crops (Table 3). The graphic representation of the EI and SI data (Fig. 5) shows that the communities studied are mostly in quadrant A, representing disturbed environments, conductive soils, enriched in nitrogen (N), and present bacterial communities. Only in three sites (S1, S2, and S4), there were samplings where the food web indices showed values within quadrant B, characterizing mature environments, with regulated soils, enriched in N and abundant bacteria communities (Fig. 5).
4 Discussion
The analysis of nematode communities in this study showed the presence of 42 genera of edaphic nematodes, both free-living and plant-parasitic. In the agroecological site (S1), Helicotylenchus was the most abundant genus with a frequency higher than 60%. This genus was also found by other authors in areas with high crop diversity of the agroecological type (Gnamkoulamba et al. 2018). When observing the crop where organic amendments were applied as fertilizers (S2), it was determined that Helicotylenchus also showed a high frequency in the samplings and the highest abundances for this site next to the genus Rhabditis coinciding these results with those obtained by Daneel et al. 2018, where Helicotylenchus was the most abundant nematode within plant feeders in sites where organic fertilizers were applied with plants of the Brassicaceae family. In horticultural systems where inorganic fertilizers are not applied, the presence of bacterivorous nematodes could be a useful way to improve the release of minerals, such as phosphate, from bacterial biomass, improving the absorption by plants (Rehman et al. 2018).
The presence of Rhabditis, as well as other bacterivorous nematodes such as Mesorhabditis in S2, could be due to the effect that the organic amendments have on the opportunists of enrichment of bacterial-feeding, which can rapidly increase their populations as do populations of nitrifying bacteria. This type of amendments based on the addition of O.M. increase the availability of nutrients, such as nitrogen, microbial biomass, and therefore the abundance of bacterivorous (Briar et al. 2007). In this sense, Lavallén and Mondino (2015) determined that the addition of nitrogen in the soil through the addition of organic fertilizers raised bacterivorous populations in crops in the horticultural region of General Pueyrredón, Buenos Aires, as well as (Azpilicueta et al. 2008) in soils with nitrogen fertilization where the community of bacterivorous nematodes reached 100% frequencies in all the samplings carried out.
In S3, dominance of Rhabditis could be related to environmental disturbances due to application of MeBr. According to Zhang et al. (2019), these nematodes are common in soils in early succession stages. Nacobbus presented the second highest value of relative abundance and a frequency of 60% in this site. Regarding Helicotylenchus, these nematodes showed a very low abundance and frequency, demonstrating a possible sensitivity of this genus to settle in soils treated with MeBr (Webster et al. 2001).
In the pristine forest (S4), a clear dominance of Helicotylenchus and Filenchus was observed, agreeing with data obtained by other authors in temperate forests (Sun et al. 2013). The fungal feeder genus Filenchus has been cited in forests as a persistent nematode in structured or late successional environments (Hánel 2001), which feed not only on mycorrhizal fungi but also on abundant saprophytic fungi in environments with high O.M. rich in carbon (Zhang et al. 2015; Mateille et al. 2016). In the S1 and S3 sites, the presence of Diploscapter coronata was the first record of the genus and species in Argentina (Salas et al. 2016). This nematode feeds on soil bacteria and is found in compost, sewage, or agricultural soil. Its importance lies in the facultative ability of parasite insects, vertebrates, and even humans (Athari and Mahmoudi 2008). Clinical symptoms include epigastric sensitivity, diarrhea, abdominal pain, and nausea. In addition, they have been considered potential carriers of pathogenic bacteria on the surface of fruits and vegetables in contact with the soil (Gibbs et al. 2005). The presence of D. coronata in S3 was found in association with root galls, caused by the parasitic nematode of Nacobbus aberrans. The detection of this nematode in greenhouses where dogs, cats, and poultry live together without any health control stresses the importance of applying adequate hygiene measures during agricultural practices to avoid contamination of fruits and vegetables and prevent infections in domestic animals and humans.
Soil fumigation with MeBr has been a common practice for the management of PPNs (Desaeger et al. 2017); but because MeBr was listed as an ozone-depleting substance by the Montreal Protocol in 1992, the production of that agent was largely discontinued by 1995. Nevertheless, in the years 2017 and 2018, countries such as Argentina, Australia, Canada, China, and South Africa have requested exemptions citing the critical use of MeBr in the treatment of strawberry, tomato, and ginger sprouts (UNEP 2016). The use of MeBr, as was observed in the present work, would not constitute a definitive means of eradicating PPNs dangerous to the region, as indicated by the presence of Nacobbus in S3. The persistence of Nacobbus and other PPNs of economic importance could lead to a frequency increase in the application of pesticides, thus altering communities of soil organisms and generating the rapid appearance of pest organisms in the absence of competitors for food. The results obtained for Hemicaloosia and Hoplolaimus (found exclusively at sites S2 and S3) were inconclusive to make inferences about their role as bioindicators. Hoplolaimus in S4 could be related to the presence of grass (dominant in the physiognomy of this site), since species belonging to this genus are cited as grass parasites (Subbotin and Chitambar 2018).
The omnivorous/predatory trophic groups did not show significant differences between the different sites indicating low abundance values; although, in the agroecological crop (S1), the highest abundance was found for this category. The nematodes cp 1 and cp 2 differed significantly between the pristine forest vs agroecosystems, showing a potential sensitivity of these variables as bioindicators of edaphic disturbances. Although the cp 3–5 did not show significant differences, the highest values were found in the pristine forest and in the agroecological crop, which could indicate more complex trophic networks than in the other sampling sites.
The analysis of guilds showed significant differences for guilds of plant feeders and fungivorous. Pl2, represented mainly by the genus Tylenchus, differed between the pristine forest and the crops treated with amendments (S2) and MeBr (S3). This species has been cited as a persistent nematode in conventional horticultural systems, especially in those that maintain monocultures. However, the feeding habits of Tylenchus have not yet been properly understood, requiring a more detailed analysis of the species of this genus and its relationship with the host plants in order to discuss their capacity as an indicator. Within the fungivorous guilds, Fu2 showed significant differences between S4 and the cultivated sites (S1, S2, and S3). Although Ferris et al. (2001) consider the guild Fu2 as an indicator of soils in basal conditions for being general opportunists, in this work, Filenchus has been found in greater abundance in forests and pastures without anthropic interventions that exhibit the fungal-based energy channel as dominant over bacteria-mediated, thus favoring the population growth of fungivorous guilds (Neher et al. 2017).
When considering the structure indices of the nematode community, the results of their values allowed establishing the agroecological crop (S1) as the most equitable and with the highest number of genera found. The significant differences found in genera richness (S), Margalef (Dmg), and Shannon-Weaver (H′) indices showed that the conventional crop treated with MeBr (S3) presented the lowest diversity of nematodes due the permanence of few genera such as Rhabditis and Nacobbus. EI allowed to recognize enriched soils, observing significant differences between the pristine forest (S4) and the three horticultural crops, being most of the samplings located in quadrant A proposed by Ferris et al. (2001) in their classification of the soil profile. The enrichment with nitrogen and the tillage favors the energy channel of decomposition dominated by bacteria which would justify these results that are consistent with those obtained for the analysis of Ba1 guilds and the values of cp 1 genera of opportunistic nematodes. CI values were significantly higher in the pristine forest (S4) due to the high abundance of Fu2, which can be explained by the large amounts of terrigenous particulate organic matter in the soil profile (Fabian et al. 2016). In the three horticultural crops, the main energy channel of decomposition would be mediated by bacteria due to the presence of the Ba1 guild. The soils belonging to the three agroecosystems studied registered disturbance, so the implementation of practices that allow for the development of the highest trophic levels in the trophic network (promoting synergies between the components of biodiversity and thus increasing the ecosystem services that nematodes provide to natural environments, such as the regulation of plant-feeder nematodes by predators, nutrient recycling, and productivity) should be considered. Monitoring of the structure and diversity of nematodes communities, as carried out in the present work, could constitute a practice for preventing the appearance of diverse pests and pathogens along with developing more adequate control strategies that would enhance the sustainability of the environment and protect human health.
5 Conclusion
This updated survey of the nematode fauna constitutes one of the most important for the horticultural region of La Plata, Buenos Aires Province, Argentina, considering the few works carried out so far in this subject. Through the monitoring realized in this work, alterations in the structure of nematode communities were observed in the analyzed sites. As was indicated by other authors, this could be a consequence of environmental disturbance such as horticultural production practices. In the context of this case study, the agroecological crop was considered the least disturbed agroecosystem, presenting the highest value of predatory-omnivorous trophic groups and diversity and equitability indices, not finding sedentary plant-parasitic nematodes of economic importance.
References
Athari A, Mahmoudi MR (2008) Diploscapter coronata infection in Iran: report of the first case and review of literature. Iran J Parasitol 3:42–47
Azpilicueta CV, Aruani MC, Reeb P, Sánchez E (2008) Estructura de la comunidad de nematodos del suelo bajo dos niveles de fertilización nitrogenada en Alto Valle de Rio Negro, Argentina. Nematropica 38:75–86
Bardgett RD, Van Der Putten WH (2014) Soil biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Nature 515:505–511
Bongers T (1990) The maturity index: an ecological measure of environmental disturbance based on nematode species composition. Oecologia 83:14–19
Bongers T (1999) The maturity index, the evolution of nematode life history traits, adaptive radiation and cp-scaling. Plant Soil 212:13–22
Briar SS, Grewal PS, Somasekhar N, Stinner D, Miller SA (2007) Soil nematode community, organic matter, microbial biomass and nitrogen dynamics in field plots transitioning from conventional to organic management. Appl Soil Ecol 37:256–266
Caveness FE, Jensen HJ (1955) Investigations of various therapeutic measures to eliminate root lesion nematodes from Easter lilies. Plant Dis Rep 39:710–715
Chaves EJ, Echeverria MM, Merlo Álvarez H, Salas A (2019) Clave para determinar géneros de nematodos del suelo de la república argentina. Fundación de Historia Natural Félix de Azara Centro de Ciencias Naturales y Antropológicas Universidad Maimónides, Buenos Aires
Clarke KR, Gorley RN (2001) PRIMER user manual: plymouth routines in multivariate ecological research. Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Plymouth
Daneel M, Engelbrecht E, Fourie H, Ahuja P (2018) The host status of Brassicaceae to Meloidogyne and their effects as cover and biofumigant crops on root-knot nematode populations associated with potato and tomato under south African field conditions. Crop Prot 110:198–206
Desaeger J, Dickson DW, Locascio SJ (2017) Methyl bromide alternatives for control of root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne spp.) in tomato production in Florida. J Nematol 49:140–149
Fabian J, Zlatanovic S, Mutz M, Premke K (2016) Fungal–bacterial dynamics and their contribution to terrigenous carbon turnover in relation to organic matter quality. The ISME Journal 11:415–425
Ferratto J, Mondino M, Grasso R, Ortiz Mackinson M, Longo A, Carrancio L, Firpo I, Rotondo R, Zembo J, Castro G, García M, Rodriguez M, Iribarren M (2010) Buenas Prácticas Agrícolas para la agricultura familiar. Cadena de las principales hortalizas de hojas en Argentina. FAO, Rome, pp 535
Ferris H (2010) Form and function: metabolic footprints of nematodes in the soil food web. Eur j soil boil 46:97–104
Ferris H, Bongers T, De Goede RGM (2001) A framework for soil food web diagnostics: extension of the nematode faunal analysis concept. Appl Soil Ecol 18:13–29
Gerhardt A (2002) Bioindicator species and their use in biomonitoring. Environmental Monitoring I. Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems. UNESCO
Gibbs DS, Anderson GL, Beuchat LR, Carta LK, Williams PL (2005) Potential role of Diploscapter sp. strain LKC25, a bacterivorous nematode from soil, as a vector of food-borne pathogenic bacteria to preharvest fruits and vegetables. J Appl Environ Microb 71:2433–2437
Gnamkoulamba A, Tounou AK, Tchab IA, Kolombia YA, Agboka K, Tchao M, Adjevi AKM, Batawila K (2018) Occurrence, abundance and distribution of plant-parasitic nematodes associated with rice (Oryza spp.) in different rice agroecosystems in Togo. Int J Biol Chem Sci 12:618–635
Hánel L (2001) Succession of soil nematodes in pine forests on coal-mining sands near Cottbus, Germany. Appl Soil Ecol 16:23–34
Heyns J (1971) A guide to the plant and soil nematodes of South Africa. Balkema Academic and Technical Publications, Cape Town
Lavallén C, Mondino E (2015) Nematodos edáficos en verduras y frutas provenientes cinturón frutihortícola del partido de General Pueyrredón, Provincia de Buenos Aires. Ciencia del Suelo 33:167–171
Manzanilla-López RH, Marbán-Mendoza N (2012) Practical plant nematology. Biblioteca básica de agricultura. México
Mateille T, Tavoillot J, Martiny B, Dmowska E, Winiszewska G, Ferji Z, El Mousadik A (2016) Aridity or low temperatures: what affects the diversity of plant parasitic nematode communities in the Moroccan argan relic forest? Appl Soil Ecol 101:64–71
Neher DA (2001) Role of nematodes in soil health and their use as indicators. J Nematol 33:161–168
Neher DA (2010) Ecology of plant and free-living nematodes in natural and agricultural soil. Annu Rev Phytopathol 48:371–394
Neher DA, Darby BJ (2009) General community indices that can be used for analysis of nematode assemblages in: Wilson, M., and Kakouli-Duarte, T. (eds) Nematodes as Environmental Bioindicators. CABI: 107–123
Neher DA, Williams KM, Lovell ST (2017) Environmental indicators reflective of road design in a forested landscape. Ecosphere 8. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1734
Norton Don C (1978) Ecology of plant-parasitic nematodes. Soil Sci 127:63
Platis DP, Anagnostopoulos CD, Tsaboula AD, Menexes GC, Kalburtji KL, Mamolos AP (2019) Energy analysis, and carbon and water footprint for environmentally friendly farming practices in agroecosystems and agroforestry. Sustainability 11
Quiroz M, Céspedes C (2019) Bokashi as an amendment and source of nitrogen in sustainable agricultural systems: a review. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 19:237–248
Rehman P, Nazir R, Naqvi TA, Pervez A, Irshad U (2018) Bacterial feeder nematodes: facilitator or competitor for plant phosphorus in soil. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 18:1173–1186
Salas A, Rusconi JM, Camino NB, Eliceche D, Achinelly MF (2016) First record of Diploscapter coronata (Rhabditida), a possible health significance nematode associated with tomato crops in Argentina. Revista Facultad de UNCUYO 49:167–173
Sánchez-Moreno S, Talavera M (2013) Los nematodos como indicadores ambientales en agroecosistemas. Ecosistemas 22:50–55
Sattler T, Duelli P, Obrist MK, Arlettaz R, Moretti M (2010) Response of arthropod species richness and functional groups to urban habitat structure and management. Landsc Ecol 25:941–954
Sieriebriennikov B, Ferris H, De Goede RGM (2014) NINJA: an automated calculation system for nematode-based biological monitoring. Eur J Soil Biol 61:90–93
Subbotin SA, Chitambar JJ (2018) Plant parasitic nematodes in sustainable agriculture of North America. Sustain Plant Crop Protection
Sun X, Zhang X, Zhang S, Dai G, Han S, Liang W (2013) Soil nematode responses to increases in nitrogen deposition and precipitation in a temperate forest. PLoS One 8:e82468
Timper P (2014) Conserving and enhancing biological control of nematodes. J Nematol 46:75–89
UNEP (Naciones Unidas para el Medio Ambiente) (2016) Exenciones para usos críticos del bromuro de metilo en 2017 y 2018. Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Medio Ambiente: 28ª Reunión de las Partes en el Protocolo de Montreal relativo a las Sustancias que Agotan la Capa de Ozono, Kigali
Webster TM, Csinos AS, Johnson AW, Dowler CC, Sumner DR, Fery RL (2001) Methyl bromide alternatives in a bell pepper–squash rotation. Crop Prot 20:605–614
Wyckhuys KAG, Bentley JW, Lie R, Nghiem LTP (2018) Maximizing farm-level uptake and diffusion of biological control innovations in today’s digital era. BioControl 63:133–148
Yang F, Tian J, Fang H, Gao Y, Xu M, Lou Y, Zhou B, Kuzyakov Y (2019) Functional soil organic matter fractions, microbial community, and enzyme activities in a mollisol under 35 years manure and mineral fertilization. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 19:430–439
Yeates GW, Bongers T, De Goede RGM, Freckman DW, Georgieva SS (1993) Feeding habits in soil nematode families and genera: an outline for soil ecologists. J Nematol 25:315–331
Zaller JG, Brühl CA (2019) Editorial: non-target effects of pesticides on organisms inhabiting agroecosystems. Front Env Sci 7:75
Zhang XK, Guan PT, Wang YL, Li Q, Zhang SX, Zhang ZY, Bezemer M, Liang WJ (2015) Community composition, diversity and metabolic footprints of soil nematodes in differently-aged temperate forests. Soil Biol Biochem 80:118–126
Zhang S, Cui S, McLaughlin NB, Liu P, Hu N, Liang W, Wu D, Liang A (2019) Tillage effects outweigh seasonal effects on soil nematode community structure. Soil Tillage Res 192:233–239
Acknowledgments
This study was carried out thanks to the support of the National Council of Scientific and Technical Research (CONICET) and National University of La Plata (UNLP). We want to thank Dr. Eliseo Chaves for identification of soil nematodes, Lic, Graciela Minardi for her contribution in the statistical analysis, D.c.v. Laura Morote for the preparation of graphics and figures, and Certified Translator Soledad García Añón for her contribution to the translation of the manuscript. We want to especially thank Professor Deborah A. Neher, from the Dept. Plant and Soil Science, Soil Ecology and Biological Indicators Laboratory, Vermont University, for constructive comments on the manuscript.
Funding
This study was funded by the National Council of Scientific and Technical Research (CONICET) and National University of La Plata (UNLP) (grant number PIP 142).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
Augusto Salas and Achinelly María Fernanda have received research grants from CONICET.
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Salas, A., Achinelly, M.F. Community Structure of Soil Nematodes Associated with the Rhizosphere of Solanum Lycopersicum in a Major Production Area in Argentina: a Case Study Among Agroecosystem Types. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 20, 43–54 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-019-00099-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-019-00099-8