Abstract
In this note, we investigate the existence of the Drazin inverse for the anti-triangular operator matrix \(M= \left( {\begin{matrix} A &{} B \\ C &{} 0 \end{matrix}}\right) \) with \(A^2=A\) and \( CAB=0\), and the explicit representation of \(M^D\) is given in term of \(A, A^D, B,C \) and \((CB)^D\). In addition, it is shown that \(\mathrm {ind} (M)\le 2 \ \mathrm {ind} (CB)+2\), which is important to prove the existence and representation of the Drazin inverse for M.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Let \(\mathcal {X}\) and \(\mathcal {Y}\) be Banach spaces. Denote by \({\mathcal B}(\mathcal {X, Y})\) the set of all bounded linear operators from \(\mathcal {X}\) to \(\mathcal {Y}\), and \({\mathcal B}(\mathcal {X, X})\) is simplified to \({\mathcal B}(\mathcal {X})\). For the operator \(T\in {\mathcal B}(\mathcal {X})\), if there exists an operator \(T^D\in {\mathcal B}(\mathcal {X})\) such that
then T is said to be Drazin invertible, and \(T^D\) is called the Drazin inverse of T. The Drazin index of T, written by \(\mathrm {ind}(T)\), is the smallest integer k such that the previous system of equations holds. In particular, if \( \mathrm {ind}(T)=0\), it can be seen that T is invertible and \(T^D=T^{-1}\). Moreover, \(T^D\) may not exist. For example, the right shift operator \(A: l^2[1,\infty )\rightarrow l^2[1,\infty )\) given by
is not Drazin invertible, since \(R(A^{k+1})\subset R(A^{k})\) and \(R(A^{k+1})\ne R(A^{k})\) for any integer k.
In 1983, Campbell [4] showed that the solutions of some second-order singular linear differential equations can be expressed by the Drazin inverse of the anti-triangular matrix \(M= \left( {\begin{matrix} A &{} B \\ C &{} 0 \end{matrix}}\right) \). From then on, many researchers began to consider the representation of the Drazin inverse for M under various conditions on A, B or C [2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 12, 14]. However, it is difficult to obtain the representation without any restriction, and it is still an open problem up to now. For more general Drazin inverse problems, we refer the reader to [1, 6, 8,9,10, 13, 15,16,17,18,19] and their references.
In this paper, the existence of the Drazin inverse for the anti-triangular operator matrix \(M= \left( {\begin{matrix} A &{} B \\ C &{} 0 \end{matrix}}\right) \) under the conditions \(A^2=A\) and \( CAB=0\) is proved. The explicit expression of \(M^D\) is further given, and the Drazin index of M is not more than \(2\ \mathrm {ind} (CB)+2\). Finally, an example is given to illustrate the obtained result.
Throughout the paper, assume that \(A\in \mathcal {B}(\mathcal {X}), B\in {\mathcal B}(\mathcal {Y, X}), C\in {\mathcal B}(\mathcal {X, Y})\) and CB is Drazin invertible with \(\mathrm {ind}(CB)=s\). We define a sum to be zero if its lower limits are larger than its upper limits. Write \(A^\pi =I-AA^D\) and
2 Main Results
We start with the following lemmas, which is necessary to prove our main results.
Lemma 2.1
If \(A^{2}=A\) and \(CAB=0\), then
-
(i)
\(F_{11}A+F_{12}C=AF_{11}+BF_{21},\)
-
(ii)
\(F_{11}B+AB=AF_{12}.\)
Proof
-
(i)
From \(A^{2}=A\), it follows that the operator A is Drazin invertible and \(A=A^{D}\), and hence, \(AA^{\pi }=0\). Thus,
$$\begin{aligned}&\begin{aligned} F_{11}A+F_{12}C&= \sum _{k=1}^{s}{A^{\pi }B(CB)^{k-1}(CB)^{\pi }CA}-\sum _{k=1}^{s}{2kAB(CB)^{k-1}(CB)^{\pi }CA}\\&\quad -\,A^{\pi }B(CB)^{D}CA+A^{\pi }B(CB)^{D}C +\sum _{k=1}^{s}{AB(CB)^{k-1}(CB)^{\pi }C}, \end{aligned} \end{aligned}$$(2.1)$$\begin{aligned}&\begin{aligned} AF_{11}+BF_{21}&= \displaystyle \sum _{k=1}^{s}{AB(CB)^{k-1}(CB)^{\pi }CA^{\pi }} -\sum _{k=1}^{s}{2kAB(CB)^{k-1}(CB)^{\pi }CA}\\&\quad -\,AB(CB)^{D}CA^{\pi }+B(CB)^{D}CA^{\pi }+\sum _{k=1}^{s}B{(CB)^{k-1}(CB)^{\pi }CA}. \end{aligned} \end{aligned}$$(2.2)By \(A^{\pi }=I-A\) and (2.1), we get
$$\begin{aligned} \begin{aligned}&F_{11}A+F_{12}C \\&\quad = \sum _{k=1}^{s}{B(CB)^{k-1}(CB)^{\pi }CA}-\sum _{k=1}^{s}{AB(CB)^{k-1}(CB)^{\pi }CA}\\&\qquad -\,\sum _{k=1}^{s}{2kAB(CB)^{k-1}(CB)^{\pi }CA}-B(CB)^{D}CA+AB(CB)^{D}CA\\&\qquad +\,B(CB)^{D}C-AB(CB)^{D}C+\sum _{k=1}^{s}{AB(CB)^{k-1}(CB)^{\pi }C}\\&\quad = \sum _{k=1}^{s}{B(CB)^{k-1}(CB)^{\pi }CA}+\sum _{k=1}^{s}{AB(CB)^{k-1}(CB)^{\pi }CA^{\pi }}\\&\qquad -\,\sum _{k=1}^{s}{2kAB(CB)^{k-1}(CB)^{\pi }CA}+B(CB)^{D}CA^{\pi }-AB(CB)^{D}CA^{\pi }. \end{aligned} \end{aligned}$$(2.3)This together with (2.2) shows that \(F_{11}A+F_{12}C=AF_{11}+BF_{21}\).
-
(ii)
From \(CAB=0\), we have \(CA^{\pi }B=CB\). Note that \((CB)^{s}(CB)^{\pi }=0\) by \(\text{ ind }(CB)=s\). Then
$$\begin{aligned} F_{11}B+AB= & {} \sum _{k=1}^{s}{AB(CB)^{k-1}(CB)^{\pi }CB}-AB(CB)^{D}CB+AB\\= & {} \sum _{k=1}^{s}{AB(CB)^{k}(CB)^{\pi }}+AB(CB)^{\pi }\\= & {} \sum _{k=0}^{s}{AB(CB)^{k}(CB)^{\pi }}\\= & {} \sum _{k=0}^{s-1}{AB(CB)^{k}(CB)^{\pi }}. \end{aligned}$$Obviously, \(F_{11}B+AB=AF_{12}\) is obtained. \(\square \)
Lemma 2.2
If \(A^{2}=A\) and \(CAB=0\), then, for \(l=2,3,\ldots \), we have
where if \(l=2m\), then
if \(l=2m+1\), then
Proof
We prove it by induction on integer \(l \ge 2\). For \(l =2\), the conclusion can be easily checked. Assume that the conclusion is satisfied for l. Next we will check it for \(l + 1\).
If \(l=2m\), then
By the given conditions, we have
Note that
and
So, it follows that
Similarly, by \(CAB=0\), we get
On the other hand, the equalities \(M^{2m}_{21}A+M^{2m}_{22}C=M^{2m+1}_{21}\) and \(M^{2m}_{21}B=M^{2m+1}_{22}\) are obvious. Therefore, the conclusion holds for \(l+1\).
If \(l=2m+1\), then the proof is analogous, and we omit it. \(\square \)
Lemma 2.3
If \(A^{2}=A\) and \(CAB=0\), then the following statements are true:
-
(i)
\( M^{2(s+1)+1}_{11}(F_{11}+A)+M^{2(s+1)+1}_{12}F_{21}= M^{2(s+1)}_{11},\)
-
(ii)
\(M^{2(s+1)+1}_{21}(F_{11}+A)+M^{2(s+1)+1}_{22}F_{21}=M^{2(s+1)}_{21}.\)
Proof
-
(i)
By \(AA^{\pi }=0, (CB)^{s}(CB)^{\pi }=0\) and \( (CB)^{s+1}(CB)^{D}=(CB)^{s},\) we obtain
$$\begin{aligned} {} \begin{aligned}&M^{2(s+1)+1}_{11}(F_{11}+A)+M^{2(s+1)+1}_{12}F_{21}\\&\quad =\sum _{k=1}^{s}{AB(CB)^{k-1}(CB)^{\pi }CA^{\pi }}-\sum _{k=1}^{s}{2kAB(CB)^{k-1}(CB)^{\pi }CA}-AB(CB)^{D}CA^{\pi }\\&\qquad +\,\sum _{k=1}^{s+1}{A(BC)^{k}}\cdot \sum _{k=1}^{s}{A^{\pi }B(CB)^{k-1}(CB)^{\pi }CA}-\sum _{k=1}^{s+1}{A(BC)^{k}}\cdot A^{\pi }B(CB)^{D}CA\\&\qquad +\,\sum _{k=0}^{s+1}{(BC)^{k}A}+\sum _{k=1}^{s+1}{A(BC)^{k}A}+\sum _{k=1}^{s}{2kA(BC)^{s+1-k}A}\\&\qquad +\sum _{k=0}^{s}{AB(CB)^{k}(CB)^{D}CA^{\pi }}\\&\qquad +\,\sum _{k=0}^{s}{AB(CB)^{k}}\cdot \sum _{k=1}^{s}{(CB)^{k-1}(CB)^{\pi }CA}+B(CB)^{s}CA^{\pi }. \end{aligned} \end{aligned}$$(2.4)From \((CB)^{\pi }=I-CB(CB)^{D}\), it follows that
$$\begin{aligned} {}\nonumber&\sum _{k=1}^{s}{AB(CB)^{k-1}(CB)^{\pi }CA^{\pi }}-AB(CB)^{D}CA^{\pi }+\sum _{k=0}^{s}{AB(CB)^{k}(CB)^{D}CA^{\pi }}\\\nonumber&\quad =\sum _{k=1}^{s}{AB(CB)^{k-1}(I-CB(CB)^{D})CA^{\pi }}+\sum _{k=1}^{s}{AB(CB)^{k}(CB)^{D}CA^{\pi }}\\&\quad =\sum _{k=1}^{s}{AB(CB)^{k-1}CA^{\pi }}. \end{aligned}$$(2.5)Since \(CA^{\pi }B=CB \), we have
$$\begin{aligned}&\sum _{k=1}^{s+1}{A(BC)^{k}}\cdot \sum _{k=1}^{s}{A^{\pi }B(CB)^{k-1}(CB)^{\pi }CA}\nonumber \\&\qquad +\sum _{k=0}^{s}{AB(CB)^{k}}\cdot \sum _{k=1}^{s}{(CB)^{k-1}(CB)^{\pi }CA}\nonumber \\&\quad =\sum _{k=1}^{s-1}{AB(CB)^{k}}\cdot \sum _{k=1}^{s}{(CB)^{k-1}(CB)^{\pi }CA}\nonumber \\&\qquad +\sum _{k=0}^{s-1}{AB(CB)^{k}}\cdot \sum _{k=1}^{s}{(CB)^{k-1}(CB)^{\pi }CA}\nonumber \\&\quad =\sum _{k=1}^{s-1}{AB(CB)^{k}}\cdot \sum _{k=1}^{s}{(CB)^{k-1}(CB)^{\pi }CA}\nonumber \\&\qquad +\sum _{k=1}^{s-1}{AB(CB)^{k}}\cdot \sum _{k=1}^{s}{(CB)^{k-1}(CB)^{\pi }CA}\nonumber \\&\qquad +\,\sum _{k=1}^{s}{AB(CB)^{k-1}(CB)^{\pi }CA}\nonumber \\&\quad =2\sum _{k=1}^{s-1}{AB(CB)^{k}}\cdot \sum _{k=1}^{s}{(CB)^{k-1}(CB)^{\pi }CA}+\sum _{k=1}^{s}{AB(CB)^{k-1}(CB)^{\pi }CA}\nonumber \\ \end{aligned}$$(2.6)and
$$\begin{aligned} \nonumber \sum _{k=1}^{s+1}{A(BC)^{k}}\cdot A^{\pi }B(CB)^{D}CA= & {} \sum _{k=1}^{s+1}{AB(CB)^{k}(CB)^{D}CA}\nonumber \\= & {} \sum _{k=1}^{s}{AB(CB)^{k}(CB)^{D}CA}+AB(CB)^{s}CA\nonumber \\= & {} \sum _{k=1}^{s}{AB(CB)^{k}(CB)^{D}CA}+A(BC)^{s+1}A.\nonumber \\ \end{aligned}$$(2.7)Again,
$$\begin{aligned} \nonumber&\sum _{k=1}^{s+1}{A(BC)^{k}A}+\sum _{k=1}^{s}{2kA(BC)^{s+1-k}A}\\\nonumber&\quad =A(BC)^{s+1}A+2\sum _{k=1}^{s}{A(BC)^{k}A}+\sum _{k=1}^{s}{(2k-1)A(BC)^{s+1-k}A}\\&\quad =A(BC)^{s+1}A+2\sum _{k=1}^{s}{A(BC)^{k}A}+\sum _{k=0}^{s-1}{(2k+1)A(BC)^{s-k}A}. \end{aligned}$$(2.8)Thus, instituting (2.5), (2.6), (2.7) and (2.8) into (2.4) yields
$$\begin{aligned} \nonumber&M^{2(s+1)+1}_{11}(F_{11}+A)+M^{2(s+1)+1}_{12}F_{21}\\\nonumber&\quad =\sum _{k=1}^{s}{AB(CB)^{k-1}CA^{\pi }}-\sum _{k=1}^{s}{2kAB(CB)^{k-1}(CB)^{\pi }CA}\\\nonumber&\qquad +\,2\sum _{k=1}^{s-1}{AB(CB)^{k}}\cdot \sum _{k=1}^{s}{(CB)^{k-1}(CB)^{\pi }CA}+\sum _{k=1}^{s}{AB(CB)^{k-1}(CB)^{\pi }CA}\\\nonumber&\qquad -\,\sum _{k=1}^{s}{AB(CB)^{k}(CB)^{D}CA}+\sum _{k=0}^{s}{(BC)^{k}A}+(BC)^{s+1}A\\&\qquad +\,\sum _{k=0}^{s-1}{(2k+1)A(BC)^{s-k}A}+2\sum _{k=1}^{s}{A(BC)^{k}A}+B(CB)^{s}CA^{\pi }. \end{aligned}$$(2.9)Note that
$$\begin{aligned} \nonumber&2\sum _{k=1}^{s}{AB(CB)^{k-1}(CB)^{\pi }CA}+2\sum _{k=1}^{s-1}{AB(CB)^{k}}\cdot \sum _{k=1}^{s}{(CB)^{k-1}(CB)^{\pi }CA}\\&\quad =\sum _{k=1}^{s}{2kAB(CB)^{k-1}(CB)^{\pi }CA} \end{aligned}$$(2.10)and
$$\begin{aligned}&\sum _{k=1}^{s}{AB(CB)^{k-1}CA^{\pi }}+\sum _{k=1}^{s}{AB(CB)^{k-1}(CB)^{\pi }CA}-\sum _{k=1}^{s}{AB(CB)^{k}(CB)^{D}CA}\nonumber \\&\qquad +\,2\sum _{k=1}^{s}{A(BC)^{k}A}\nonumber \\&\quad =\sum _{k=1}^{s}{AB(CB)^{k-1}C}-2\sum _{k=1}^{s}{AB(CB)^{k}(CB)^{D}CA}+2\sum _{k=1}^{s}{A(BC)^{k}A}\nonumber \\&\quad =\sum _{k=1}^{s}{A(BC)^{k}}-2\sum _{k=1}^{s}{AB(CB)^{k}(CB)^{D}CA}+2\sum _{k=1}^{s}{AB(CB)^{k-1}CA}\nonumber \\&\quad =\sum _{k=1}^{s}{A(BC)^{k}}+2\sum _{k=1}^{s}{AB(CB)^{k-1}(CB)^{\pi }CA} \end{aligned}$$(2.11)by \(A^{\pi }=I-A\) and \((CB)^{\pi }=I-CB(CB)^{D}\). Combining (2.9), (2.11) and (2.10), we have
$$\begin{aligned}&M^{2(s+1)+1}_{11}(F_{11}+A)+M^{2(s+1)+1}_{12}F_{21}\\&\quad =\sum _{k=0}^{s}{(BC)^{k}A}+(BC)^{s+1}A+\sum _{k=1}^{s}{A(BC)^{k}}+\sum _{k=0}^{s-1}{(2k+1)A(BC)^{s-k}A}\\&\qquad +(BC)^{s+1}A^{\pi }\\&\quad =\sum _{k=0}^{s-1}{(BC)^{k}A}+\sum _{k=1}^{s}{A(BC)^{k}}+\sum _{k=0}^{s-1}{(2k+1)A(BC)^{s-k}A}+(BC)^{s+1}\\&\quad =M^{2(s+1)}_{11}. \end{aligned}$$ -
(ii)
The facts
$$\begin{aligned} \begin{aligned} M^{2(s+1)+1}_{21}F_{11}&=-(CB)^{s+1}CA,\\ M^{2(s+1)+1}_{21}A&=\sum _{k=0}^{s}{(CB)^{k}CA}+(CB)^{s+1}CA,\\ M^{2(s+1)+1}_{22}F_{21}&=0 \end{aligned} \end{aligned}$$can be obtained from \(CAB=0, AA^{\pi }=0, (CB)^{s}(CB)^{\pi }=0\) and \((CB)^{s+1}(CB)^{D}=(CB)^{s}\). Thus, claim (ii) follows immediately. The proof is completed. \(\square \)
The following is the main result of this section.
Theorem 2.1
For the anti-triangular operator matrix \(M=\left( \begin{array}{ll} A &{} B\\ C &{} 0 \\ \end{array} \right) \), if \(A^{2}=A\), \(CAB=0\), and CB is Drazin invertible, then M is Drazin invertible, and the representation of the Drazin inverse \(M^D\) is given by
\(M^{D}=\left( \begin{array}{ll} F_{11}+A &{} \quad F_{12} \\ F_{21}&{} \quad 0\\ \end{array} \right) \).
Moreover, \(\mathrm {ind} (M)\le 2s+2\).
Proof
Let \(X=\left( \begin{array}{ll} F_{11}+A &{} F_{12} \\ F_{21} &{} 0 \\ \end{array}\right) \). In the following, we prove that X satisfies the definition of Drazin inverse, namely \(X = M^D\).
Firstly, we verify \(MX=XM\). By computation,
By \(CA^{\pi }B=CB\), we get
Moreover, \(F_{21}A=\sum _{k=0}^{s-1}{(CB)^{k}(CB)^{\pi }CA}\) from \(AA^{\pi }=0\). It is clear that \(CF_{11}+CA= F_{21}A\). So, \(MX=XM\) follows from Lemma 2.1 together with \(CF_{12}=CB(CB)^{D}=F_{21}B.\)
Secondly, we verify \(XMX = X\). By (2.12),
where \(T =F_{11}A+A+F_{12}C,\ \ P =F_{11}B+AB,\ \ R =F_{21}A \) and \(Q =F_{21}B.\)
We only prove \(TF_{11}+TA+PF_{21}=F_{11}+A\) and \(TF_{12}=F_{12}\). In the same way, \( RF_{11}+RA+QF_{21} =F_{21}\) and \( RF_{12} =0\) can be proved.
Since \((CB)^{\pi }(CB)^{\pi }=(CB)^{\pi }\), by (2.10), we obtain
Again, from \(((CB)^{D})^{2}CB=(CB)^{D}\), it follows that
Thus, we conclude that \(XMX=X\).
Finally, we prove that there exists an integer r such that \(M^{r+1}X=M^{r}\). We set \(r=2s+2\), then
By Lemma 2.3, we only need to prove that
A simple computation shows that
and
So, \(M^{r+1}X=M^{r}\) holds for \(r = 2s+2\)
Hence, by the definition of Drazin inverse, we have \(X=M^{D}\), which shows that the operator matrix M is Drazin invertible and \(\mathrm {ind} (M)\le 2s+2\). This completes the proof. \(\square \)
The following corollaries are obvious by Theorem 2.1.
Corollary 2.1
For the anti-triangular operator matrix \(M=\left( \begin{array}{ll} A &{} B\\ C &{} 0 \\ \end{array} \right) \), if \(A^{2}=A\), \(CA=0\), and CB is Drazin invertible, then M is Drazin invertible, and
Corollary 2.2
For the anti-triangular operator matrix \(M=\left( \begin{array}{ll} A &{} B\\ C &{} 0 \\ \end{array} \right) \), if \(A^{2}=A\), \(AB=0\), and CB is Drazin invertible, then M is Drazin invertible, and
3 Numerical Example
In order to illustrate the representation of \(M^D\) in Theorem 2.1, we give the following example.
Example
Let \(M=\left( \begin{array}{ll} A &{} B\\ C &{} 0 \\ \end{array} \right) \), where
By computation, it follows that \(A^2=A, CAB=0\). So all the conditions of Theorem 2.1 are satisfied. On the other hand,
Thus,
Therefore, by Theorem 2.1, the Drazin inverse of M is
Remark
In the above example, \(ABC\ne 0 \) and \(BCA\ne 0 \). So the Drazin inverse of M cannot be obtained by [9, Theorem 3] and [6, Theorem 4.5].
References
Ben-Israel, A., Greville, T.N.E.: Generalized Inverses: Theory and Applications, 2nd edn. Springer, New York (2003)
Bu, C., Zhang, K., Zhao, J.: Representations of the Drazin inverse on solution of a class singular differential equations. Linear Multilinear Algebra 59, 863–877 (2011)
Bu, C., Zhao, J., Tang, J.: Representation of the Drazin inverse for special block matrix. Appl. Math. Comput. 217, 4935–4943 (2011)
Campbell, S.L.: The Drazln inverse and systems of second order linear differential equations. Linear Multilinear Algebra 14, 195–198 (1983)
Castro-González, N., Dopazo, E.: Representations of the Drazin inverse for a class of block matrices. Linear Algebra Appl. 400, 253–269 (2005)
Castro-González, N., Dopazo, E., Martínez-Serrano, M.F.: On the Drazin inverse of the sum of two operators and its application to operator matrices. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 350, 207–215 (2009)
Castro-González, N., Dopazo, E., Robles, J.: Formulas for the Drazin inverse of special block matrices. Appl. Math. Comput. 174, 252–270 (2006)
Cvetković-Ilić, D.S.: A note on the representation for the Drazin inverse of 2 \(\times \) 2 block matrices. Linear Algebra Appl. 429, 242–248 (2008)
Cvetković, A.S., Milovanović, G.V.: On Drazin inverse of operator matrices. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 375, 331–335 (2011)
Dajicć, A., Koliha, J.J.: The weighted g-Drazin inverse for operators. J. Aust. Math. Soc. 82, 163–181 (2007)
Deng, C.: Generalized Drazin inverses of anti-triangular block matrices. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 368, 1–8 (2010)
Deng, C., Wei, Y.: A note on the Drazin inverse of an anti-triangular matrix. Linear Algebra Appl. 431, 1910–1922 (2009)
Hartwig, R., Li, X., Wei, Y.: Representations for the Drazin inverse of \(2 \times 2 \) block matrix. SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl. 27, 757–771 (2005)
Huang, J., Shi, Y., Chen, A.: The representation of the Drazin inverse of anti-triangular operator matrices based on resolvent expansions. Appl. Math. Comput. 242, 196–201 (2014)
Kolundžija, M.Z., Mosić, D., Djordjević, D.S.: Further results on the generalized Drazin inverse of block matrices in Banach algebras. Bull. Malays. Math. Sci. Soc. 38, 483–498 (2015)
Ljubisavljević, J., Cvetković-Ilić, D.S.: Additive results for the Drazin inverse of block matrices and applications. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 235, 3683–3690 (2011)
Mosiá, D.: More results on generalized Drazin inverse of block matrices in Banach algebras. Linear Algebra Appl. 439, 2468–2478 (2013)
Robles, J., Martinez-Serrano, M.F., Dopazo, E.: On the generalized Drazin inverse in Banach algebras in terms of the generalized Schur complement. Appl. Math. Comput. 284, 162–168 (2016)
Višjić, J.: On additive properties of the Drazin inverse of block matrices and representations. Appl. Math. Comput. 250, 444–450 (2015)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Poom Kumam.
This work is supported by the NNSF of China (Nos. 11261034 and 11461049), and the NSF of Inner Mongolia (No. 2017MS0118).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, H., Wu, C. & Huang, J. Drazin Inverse of Anti-triangular Operator Matrices. Bull. Malays. Math. Sci. Soc. 42, 1071–1083 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40840-017-0533-5
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40840-017-0533-5