Abstract
Let P be a nonzero integer and let \((U_{n})\) and \((V_{n})\) denote Lucas sequences of first and second kind defined by \(U_{0}=0, U_{1}=1; V_{0}=2, V_{1}=P;\) and \(U_{n+1}=PU_{n}+U_{n-1},V_{n+1}=PV_{n}+V_{n-1}\) for \( n\ge 1.\) In this study, when P is odd, we show that the equation \( U_{n} =7\square \) has only the solution \((n,P)=(2,7\square )\) when 7|P and the equation \(V_{n}=7\square \) has only the solution \( (n,P)=(1,7\square )\) when 7|P or \((n,P)=(4,1)\) when \(P^{2}\equiv 1( \text{ mod } 7).\) In addition, we show that the equation \(V_{n}=7V_{m}\square \) has a solution if and only if \(P^{2}=-3+7\square \) and \( (n,m)=(3,1).\) Moreover, we show that the equation \(U_{n}=7U_{m} \square \) has only the solution \((n,m,P,\square )=(8,4,1,1)\) when P is odd.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Let P and Q be nonzero integers. Lucas sequence of first kind \(\left( U_{n}\left( P,Q\right) \right) \) and Lucas sequence of second kind \(\left( V_{n}\left( P,Q\right) \right) ,\) with parameters P and Q, are defined as follows:
and
Lucas sequences of first and second kind for negative subscripts are defined as
respectively. Assume that \(P^{2}+4Q\ne 0.\) Explicitly, if \(\alpha =\left( P+ \sqrt{P^{2}+4Q}\right) /2\) and \(\beta =\left( P-\sqrt{P^{2}+4Q}\right) /2\) are the roots of \(x^{2}-Px-Q=0,\) then we have the following well-known expressions named Binet’s formula
for all \(n\in \mathbb {Z} .\) Special cases of the sequences \((U_{n})\) and \((V_{n})\) are known under different names. The names under which they are known are Fibonacci, Pell, etc. When \(Q=-1,\) we present \((U_{n})\) and \((V_{n})\) by \(\left( U_{n}(P,-1)\right) \) and \(\left( V_{n}(P,-1)\right) ,\) respectively. For more information about Lucas sequences of first and second kind, see [1].
Investigations of the properties of second-order linear sequences have a very long history and literature. These investigations have given rise to questions concerning whether, for certain pairs \(\left( P,Q\right) , U_{n}\), or \(V_{n}\) is a square \(\left( =\square \right) \) or \(k\square .\) There are several results when the terms of these sequences are square. Now we summarize briefly the relevant known facts. In [2, 3], Cohn determined the square and twice the squares in \((U_{n})\) and \((V_{n})\) when P is odd and \(Q=\pm 1.\) Ribenboim and McDaniel [4] determined all indices n such that \(U_{n}=\square ,2U_{n}=\square , V_{n}=\square ,\) and \(2V_{n}=\square \) for all odd relatively prime integers P and Q. In [5], the same authors solved the equations \(V_{n}=3\square \) for \( P\equiv 1,3(\text{ mod } 8),Q\equiv 3(\text{ mod } 4), (P,Q)=1\) and solved the equation \(U_{n}=3\square \) for all odd relatively prime integers P and Q. Bremner and Tzanakis [6] extended the result of the equation \( U_{n}=\square \) by determining all sequence \((U_{n})\) with \(U_{12}=\square ,\) subject only to the restriction that \((P,Q)=1.\) In a later paper, the same authors [7] showed that for \(n=2,\ldots ,7\), \(U_{n}\) is a square for infinitely many coprime P, Q and determined all sequences \((U_{n})\) with \( U_{n}=\square , n=8,10,11.\) And also in [8], they discussed the more general problem of finding all integers n, P, Q for which \(U_{n}=k\square \) for a given integer k. Cohn [9] dealt with the equations \(V_{n}=V_{m}\square \) and \(V_{n}=2V_{m}\square \) when P is odd and \(Q=1.\) McDaniel and Ribenboim [10] dealt with the equations \( V_{n}=V_{m}\square \) and \(U_{n}=U_{m}\square \) for general odd Q with \( (P,Q)=1.\) Şiar and Keskin [11], assuming \(Q = 1\), showed that there are no integer solutions to the equations \(V_{n}=3\square \) and \(V_{n}=6\square \) when P is odd and they also gave solutions to the equations \( V_{n}=3V_{m}\square \) and \(V_{n}=6V_{m}\square .\) In [12], when \( Q=1, \) Keskin and Karaatlı solved the equations \(U_{n}=5\square \) and \( U_{n}=5U_{m}\square \) under some assumptions on P. They solved the equations \(V_{n}=5\square \) with P odd and \(Q=1\) and they also showed that the equation \(V_{n}=5V_{m}\square \) has no solutions. Interested readers can also consult [11] or [12] to see the survey of such results.
In this study, using congruences, with extensive reliance upon the Jacobi symbol, we will solve the equations \(U_{n}=7\square ,V_{n}=7\square , U_{n}=7U_{m}\square ,\) and \(V_{n}=7V_{m}\square \) under the conditions that P is odd and \(Q=1.\) Our method of proof is similar to that presented by Cohn, McDaniel, and Ribenboim [2–4, 9].
2 Preliminary Facts, Some Lemmas, and Theorems
In this section, we state the necessary identities, lemmas, and theorems. Throughout the paper, unless otherwise stated, \(Q=1\) and m, n are positive integers. Also, \(\left( \frac{*}{*}\right) \) will denote the Jacobi symbol. The proofs of the following four theorems can be found in [13].
Theorem 1
Let \(n\in \mathbb {N} \cup \left\{ 0\right\} , m,r\in \mathbb {Z}\) and m be a nonzero integer. Then
Theorem 2
Let \(n\in \mathbb {N} \cup \left\{ 0\right\} \) and \(m,r\in \mathbb {Z} .\) Then
The following congruences are valid for the numbers \(U_{n}=U_{n}(P,-1)\) and \( V_{n}=V_{n}(P,-1).\)
Theorem 3
Let \(n\in \mathbb {N} \cup \left\{ 0\right\} , m,r\in \mathbb {Z} \) and m be a nonzero integer. Then
Theorem 4
Let \(n\in \mathbb {N} \cup \left\{ 0\right\} \) and \(m,r\in \mathbb {Z} .\) Then
The following lemmas can be proved by using Theorems 1 and 2.
Lemma 5
Lemma 6
Lemma 7
We state the following lemma without proof.
Lemma 8
All positive integer solutions to the equation \(x^{2}-7y^{2}=-3\) are given by \((x,y)=\left( 2U_{m+1}(16,-1)+5U_{m}(16,-1),U_{m+1}(16,-1)-2U_{m}(16,-1)\right) \) with \( m\ge 0\) or \((x,y)=\left( 5U_{m}(16,-1)+2U_{m-1}(16,-1),2U_{m}(16,-1)-U_{m-1}(16,-1)\right) \) with \( m\ge 1.\)
We omit the proofs of the following lemma, as it is based a straightforward induction.
Lemma 9
If n is even, then \(V_{n}\equiv 2 (\text{ mod } P^{2})\) and if n is odd, then \(V_{n}\equiv nP (\text{ mod } P^{2}).\)
The following theorem can be obtained from Theorem 11 given in [9].
Theorem 10
Let P be an odd integer, \(m\ge 1\) be an integer, and \( V_{n}=V_{m}x^{2}\) for some integer x. Then \(n=m\) or \(n=3, m=1, P=1.\)
Now we begin by listing the properties which will be used.
Let \(m=2^{a}k,n=2^{b}l, k\) and l odd, \(a,b\ge 0,\) and \(d=(m,n).\) Then
By using (2.10), we readily obtain from (2.18) that
If 7|P and n is odd, then \(7|V_{n}\) from Lemma 6 and therefore from (2.19), it follows that
If P is odd, then \(V_{2^{r}}\equiv 3 (\text{ mod } 8)\) if \(r=1\) and \( V_{2^{r}}\equiv 7(\text{ mod }8)\) if \(r>1,\) which can be found in [4]. And so, it is clear that
for \(r\ge 1.\) Moreover,
If P is even, then
Properties between (2.11)–(2.18) can be found in [5, 14, 15]. The others are well known.
3 Main Theorems
In this section, we shall establish some theorems and lemmas which will be required later.
Theorem 11
The equation \(x^{4}-7y^{2}=-3\) has no positive integer solution.
Proof
Assume that \(x^{4}-7y^{2}=-3\) for some \(x,y>0.\) If y is odd, then it follows that \(x^{4}\equiv 4\left( \text{ mod }\text { }8\right) ,\) which is impossible. Thus, y is even and therefore x is odd. Note that the equation \(x^{4}-7y^{2}=-3\) implies that
By Lemma 8, we get \(x^{2}=2U_{m+1}(16,-1)+5U_{m}(16,-1)\) or \( x^{2}=5U_{m}(16,-1)+2U_{m-1}(16,-1).\) Assume that
Since x is odd, it is seen from (2.23) that m is odd. Besides,
which implies that \(5|U_{m+1}.\) It can be easily shown that \(5|U_{m}(16,-1)\) iff 3|m. Thus, we get \(m+1=3k\) for some \(k>0.\) Since m is odd, k is even and therefore \(k=2q.\) Hence, we have \(m=6q-1\) with \(q\ge 0.\) And so, by (2.5), we get
implying that \(x^{2}\equiv -5 \left( \text{ mod }\text { }17\right) ,\) because \(17|U_{3}(16,-1).\) But this is impossible since \(\left( \frac{-5}{17} \right) =-1.\)
Similarly, we prove that the equation \(x^{2}=5U_{m}(16-1)+2U_{m-1}(16,-1)\) is impossible. This completes the proof. \(\square \)
Lemma 12
The equation \(9x^{4}-21y^{2}=-3\) has no positive integer solution.
Proof
Dividing both sides of the equation by 3 gives \(7y^{2}-3x^{4}=1.\) Now let us consider the equation
Since the fundamental solution to (3.1) is \(2\sqrt{7}+3\sqrt{3},\) it can be shown that all positive integer solutions to (3.1) are given by \((u,v)=(2(U_{n+1}-U_{n}),3(U_{n+1}+U_{n})),\) where \(U_{n}=U_{n}(150,-1).\) Therefore, we have \(x^{2}=3(U_{n+1}+U_{n}).\) It can be easily seen that
Hence, if n is odd, then \(x^{2}\equiv -3n-3+3n\equiv -3(\text{ mod } 8),\) a contradiction. If n is even, then \(x^{2}\equiv 3n+3-3n\equiv 3(\text{ mod } 8),\) a contradiction. This completes the proof. \(\square \)
We begin with the following theorem. This result will be used in the solution to the equation \(U_{n}=7\square .\)
Theorem 13
If P is an odd integer, then there is no integer x such that \(V_{n}=14x^{2}.\)
Proof
Assume \(V_{n}=14x^{2}\) and P is odd. Since \(2|V_{n}, 3|n\) by (2.12 ). The remainder of the proof is split into two cases.
Case I: Assume 7|P or \(P^{2}\equiv 4 (\text{ mod } 7).\) Since \( 7|V_{n}, \) it is seen from Lemma 6 that \(2\not \mid n.\) Since 3|n, we get \(n=3t\) and therefore \(2\not \mid t.\) Thus we can write \(n=12q\pm 3.\) And so, by (2.2), we obtain \(V_{n}=V_{12q\pm 3}\equiv \pm V_{3} (\text{ mod } U_{6}),\) which implies that \(14x^{2}\equiv \pm 4P\equiv 4 (\text{ mod } 8).\) This shows that \(x^{2}\equiv 2 (\text{ mod } 4),\) a contradiction.
Case II: Assume \(P^{2}\equiv 1 (\text{ mod } 7)\) or \(P^{2}\equiv 2 ( \text{ mod } 7).\) Since \(7|V_{n},\) it follows that \(n=4t\) for some odd t by Lemma 6. Since 3|n, we see that 3|t and therefore \(t=6q+3.\) Thus we can write \(n=24q+12.\) Let \(P^{2}\equiv 1 (\text{ mod } 7).\) And so, by (2.4), we get
which implies that \(14x^{2}\equiv -2 (\text{ mod } P^{2}+2).\) Hence, we obtain \(1=\left( \frac{-7}{P^{2}+2}\right) \) . But this is impossible since
Now let \(P^{2}\equiv 2(\text{ mod } 7).\) Since \(n=24q+12,\) it follows from ( 2.2) that
which implies that \(14x^{2}\equiv 2 (\text{ mod } P^{2}+1),\) i.e., \( 7x^{2}\equiv 1 (\text{ mod }(P^{2}+1)/2).\) But this is also impossible since
This completes the proof. \(\square \)
Theorem 14
Let P be odd. If 7|P, then \(V_{n}=7x^{2}\) is possible if and only if \((P,n)=(7\square ,1).\) If \(7\not \mid P,\) then \(V_{n}=7x^{2}\) is impossible, except for the case \((P,n)=(1,4).\)
Proof
Assume that \(V_{n}=7x^{2}, 7|P\) and P is odd. Then by Theorem 3.4 given in [11], we get \(n=1\) or \(n=3.\) If \(n=1,\) then \( V_{1}=P=7x^{2}\) is a solution. If \(n=3,\) then \(V_{3}=P(P^{2}+3)=7x^{2}.\) Since 7|P, it follows that \(\left( P/7\right) \left( P^{2}+3\right) =x^{2}. \) Clearly, \(d=\left( P/7,P^{2}+3\right) =1\) or 3.
Let \(d=1.\) Then, \(P^{2}+3=b^{2}\) gives \(3=(b-P)(b+P)\) and the only positive integer solution is \((b,P)=(2,1),\) which is not convenient since we must have 7|P.
Let \(d=3.\) Then we have
It is seen from (3.3) that 3|P and therefore
for some \(c>0.~\)Substituting (3.4) into (3.3), we immediately have the Pell equation \(b^{2}-3c^{2}=1.\) It is well known that all positive integer solutions to the equation \(b^{2}-3c^{2}=1\) are given by \(\left( b,c\right) =\left( V_{m}\left( 4,-1\right) /2,U_{m}\left( 4,-1\right) \right) \) with \(m\ge 1.\) On the other hand, since \(3c=21a^{2},\) we get \( c=7a^{2}.\) So, we are looking for the solutions \(U_{m}\left( 4,-1\right) =7\square .\) Since \(7|U_{4}(4,-1),\) it can be easily shown that \( 7|U_{m}(4,-1)\) iff \(m=4k\) for some \(k\ge 1.\) Then by (2.9), it follows that
From (2.14) and (2.23), it is seen that \(\left( U_{2k}\left( 4,-1\right) ,V_{2k}\left( 4,-1\right) \right) =2.\) Then either
or
From now on and until the end of this paragraph, instead of \(U_{n}(4,-1)\) and \(V_{n}(4,-1),\) we will write \(U_{n}\) and \(V_{n},\) respectively. Suppose ( 3.5) is satisfied. Clearly, \(7|V_{2k}.\) Since \(7|V_{2},\) it can be easily shown that k is odd. Let \(k=4q\pm 1.\) By (2.5), we get
Since \(8|U_{4},\) the previous congruence becomes \(2u^{2}\equiv \pm 4 ( \text{ mod } 8),\) which is impossible. Suppose (3.6) is satisfied. We show that if \(V_{n}=2v^{2},\) then 3|n. Let \(n=6q+r, 0\le r\le 5.\) Then by (2.6), it follows that \(V_{n}\equiv V_{r} (\text{ mod } U_{3}),\) implying that \(2v^{2}\equiv V_{r} (\text{ mod } 5)\) since \(5|U_{3}.\) From this, it follows that \(r=0\) or 3. This shows that 3|n. Returning to the equation \(V_{2k}=2v^{2},\) we have \(k=3r.\) Thus \(V_{6r}=V_{3\cdot 2r}=V_{2r}(V_{2r}^{2}-3)=2v^{2}\) by (2.11). This implies that \(v^{2}= \frac{V_{2r}}{2}(V_{2r}^{2}-3).\) On the other hand, since \( V_{n}^{2}-12U_{n}^{2}=4\) by (2.22), we see that \(3\not \mid V_{n}.\) Thus, \(\left( \frac{V_{2r}}{2},V_{2r}^{2}-3\right) =1.\) Then, we have \( V_{2r}^{2}-3=a^{2},\) which is impossible.
Now we consider the case \(P^{2}\equiv 1 (\text{ mod } 7).\) Since \(7|V_{n},\) it follows from Lemma 6 that \(n=4t\) for some odd integer t. Let \( t>1.\) We can write \(t=4q\pm 1\) with \(q\ge 1\) and therefore \(n=4t=2\cdot 2^{r}a\pm 4,\) with a odd and \(r\ge 3.\) Thus by (2.4), we get \( V_{n}\equiv -V_{4} (\text{ mod } V_{2^{r}}).\) If \(r=3,\) then
and if \(r>3,\) then
Since \(V_{8}=V_{4}^{2}-2\) by (2.10), it follows that \(V_{8}\equiv -2 (\text{ mod } V_{4})\) and therefore \(V_{2^{r}}\equiv 2 (\text{ mod } V_{4}).\) Note that \(V_{4}=P^{4}+4P^{2}+2.\) Since \(P^{2}\equiv 1 (\text{ mod } 7),\) we see that \(7|V_{4}\) and therefore by (2.10), we have \( V_{8}\equiv -2 (\text{ mod } 7)\) and \(V_{2^{r}}\equiv 2 (\text{ mod } 7). \) Besides, since P is odd, it follows that \(V_{4}\equiv 7 (\text{ mod } 8)\) and \(V_{8}\equiv 7 (\text{ mod } 8).\) Also, \(\left( \frac{-1}{ V_{2^{r}}}\right) =-1\) by (2.21). Assume that \(r=3,\) so that, by (3.7 ), we have \(\left( \frac{7}{V_{8}}\right) =\left( \frac{-1}{V_{8}}\right) \left( \frac{V_{4}}{V_{8}}\right) .\) But this is impossible since
and
because \(V_{4}+2=(P^{2}+2)^{2}.\)
Now assume that \(r>3,\) so that, (3.8) is satisfied. Then, it follows that \(\left( \frac{7}{V_{2^{r}}}\right) =\left( \frac{-1}{V_{2^{r}}}\right) \left( \frac{V_{4}}{V_{2^{r}}}\right) .\) But this is also impossible since
and
Hence, we conclude that \(t=1.\) Then \(n=4\) and therefore \( V_{4}=(P^{2}+2)^{2}-2=V_{n}=7x^{2}.\) Now, we consider the equation \( u^{2}-7v^{2}=2\) with \(u=P^{2}+2.\) It can be easily shown that all positive integer solutions to the equation \(u^{2}-7v^{2}=2\) are given by
with \(m\ge 0.\) And so, we get \(P^{2}+2=3(U_{m+1}(16,-1)-U_{m}(16,-1)).\) From now on and until the end of the case \(P^{2}\equiv 1 (\text{ mod } 7),\) instead of \(U_{m}(16,-1),\) we will write \(U_{m}.\) Let \(m=4q+r, 0\le r\le 3.\) Then by (2.5), it follows that \(U_{4q+r}\equiv U_{r} (\text{ mod } U_{2}),\) implying that \(P^{2}+2\equiv 3(U_{r+1}-U_{r}) (\text{ mod } 16) \) since \(16|U_{2}.\) A simple calculation shows that \(r=0\) and therefore 4|m. So, we can write \(m=12q, 12q+4\) or \(12q+8.\) If \(m=12q+4,\) then we obtain \(P^{2}+2\equiv 3(U_{12q+5}-U_{12q+4})\equiv 3(U_{5}-U_{4}) (\text{ mod } U_{3})\) by (2.5). Since \(5|U_{3},\) we immediately have \( P^{2}+2\equiv 0 (\text{ mod } 5),\) which is impossible. Now the remainder of the proof is split into two cases.
Case I: Let \(m=12q\) with \(q\ge 0.\) If \(q>0,\) then we can write \(m=12q=2\cdot 2^{r}\cdot 3a,\) with a odd and \(r\ge 1.\) Thus by (2.7 ), we get
leading to
If \(r\ge 2,\) then a simple calculation shows that \(V_{2^{r}}\equiv 2 ( \text{ mod } 8)\) and \(V_{2^{r}}\equiv -1 (\text{ mod } 5).\) Thus, \( V_{2^{r}}/2\equiv 1 (\text{ mod } 4)\) and \(V_{2^{r}}/2\equiv 2 (\text{ mod } 5).\) From (3.9), it is seen that \(1=\left( \frac{-1}{V_{2^{r}}/2} \right) \left( \frac{5}{V_{2^{r}}/2}\right) .\) But this is impossible since
and
Hence, we get \(r=1.\) By (2.7), it follows that \(P^{2}+2=3(U_{2\cdot 6a+1}-U_{2\cdot 6a}) \equiv -3 (\text{ mod } V_{6}),\) i.e., \( P^{2}\equiv -5 (\text{ mod } V_{6}/2).\) This implies that \(1=\left( \frac{ -1}{V_{6}/2}\right) \left( \frac{5}{V_{6}/2}\right) .\) Using the fact that \( V_{6}/2\equiv 1 (\text{ mod } 5)\) and \(V_{6}/2\equiv 3 (\text{ mod } 4),\) we readily obtain
a contradiction. Thus, we get \(q=0.\) Then \(m=0\) and therefore \(P^{2}+2=3.\) This gives that \(P=1.\)
Case II: Let \(m=12q+8\) with \(q\ge 0.\) This implies that \(m=12u-4.\) Then by (2.7), we get
A simple calculation shows that \(11|V_{3}, U_{4}\equiv 5 (\text{ mod } 11),\) and \(U_{3}\equiv 2 (\text{ mod } 11).\) Thus, it is seen that \( P^{2}\equiv 7 (\text{ mod } 11),\) which is impossible since \(\left( \frac{7 }{11}\right) =\left( \frac{-4}{11}\right) =-1.\)
Assume that \(P^{2}\equiv 2 (\text{ mod } 7).\) Since \(7|V_{n},\) it follows from Lemma 6 that \(n=4t\) for some odd integer t. Similar arguments used for the case when \(P^{2}\equiv 1 (\text{ mod } 7)\) show that \(P=1.\) But this is impossible since \(P^{2}\equiv 2 (\text{ mod } 7).\)
Assume that \(P^{2}\equiv 4 (\text{ mod } 7).\) Since \(7|V_{n},\) it follows that \(n=3t\) for some odd integer t by Lemma 6. Hence, \( V_{n}=V_{3t}=V_{t}(V_{t}^{2}+3)\) from (2.11). Clearly, \(\left( V_{t},V_{t}^{2}+3\right) =1\) or 3.
Let \(\left( V_{t},V_{t}^{2}+3\right) =1.\) Then either
or
for some positive integers a and b. But the two relations (3.11) lead to \(b^{2}\equiv 3 (\text{ mod } 7)\) which is impossible, hence (3.10) is satisfied. Solving the systems of equations \(V_{t}=a^{2}, V_{t}^{2}+3=7b^{2}\) gives \(a^{4}-7b^{2}=-3,\) which has no positive integer solution by Theorem 11.
Let \(\left( V_{t},V_{t}^{2}+3\right) =3.\) This implies that either
or
for some \(a,b>0.\) Assume that (3.12) is satisfied. Then we get \( 9a^{4}-21b^{2}=-3,\) which has no positive integer solution by Lemma 12. Now assume that (3.13) is satisfied. Since \(3|V_{t}\) and t is odd, it follows from Lemma 5 that 3|P. On the other hand, it is seen that \(V_{t}^{2}=V_{2t}-2\) by (2.10). Combining the equation \( V_{t}^{2}=V_{2t}-2\) with \(V_{t}^{2}+3=3b^{2}\) gives \(V_{2t}=3b^{2}-1.\) Let \( t>1.\) Then we can write \(t=4q\pm 1=2^{r}z\pm 1\) with z odd and \(r\ge 2.\) And so by (2.4), we get
implying that
This means that
We have \(\left( \frac{-1}{V_{2^{r}}}\right) =-1\) and \(\left( \frac{U_{3}}{ V_{2^{r}}}\right) =1\) by (2.21) and (2.15), respectively. On the other hand, \(V_{2^{r}}\equiv 2 \left( \text{ mod } \text { }3\right) \) by (2.13), leading to
Therefore,
which contradicts the displayed relation a few lines above. Hence, \(t=1\) and therefore \(V_{1}=P=21\square .\) But this contradicts the fact that \( P^{2}\equiv 4 \left( \text{ mod } \text { }7\right) .\) This completes the proof. \(\square \)
Theorem 15
If P is odd, then, a relation of the form \(V_{n}=7V_{m}x^{2}\) with \(V_{m}\ne 1,\) is possible if and only if \(P^{2}=-3+7\square ,\) (hence P is given by Lemma 8) and \((n,m)=(3,1).\) If P is even and \( P^{2}\equiv 2(\text{ mod } 7),\) then a relation of the form \( V_{n}=7V_{m}x^{2}\) with \(V_{m}\ne 1,\) is impossible.
Proof
The strategy of the proof is as follows. Let \(V_{n}=7V_{m}x^{2},\) where \( V_{m}\ne 1.\) Under the assumption that, either \(P\equiv 0,\pm 1(\text{ mod } 7)\) and P is odd, or \(P^{2}\equiv 2(\text{ mod } 7)\) (independently of the parity of P), we will arrive at a contradiction. Finally, if \( P^{2}\equiv 4(\text{ mod } 7)\) and P is odd, we will prove that \( (n,m)=(3,1).\) In the last case, \(V_{3}=7V_{1}x^{2},\) which is equivalent to \( P^{2}-7x^{2}=-3;\) hence P is obtained by applying Lemma 8.
Case I: Assume that 7|P and \(V_{n}=7V_{m}x^{2}.\) Since \(7|V_{n},\) it follows from Lemma 6 that \(n\ge 3\) is odd. Furthermore, since \( V_{m}|V_{n},\) there exists an odd integer t such that \(n=mt\) by (2.16 ). Thus, m is odd. Therefore, we have \(V_{n}\equiv nP \left( \text{ mod } \text { }P^{2}\right) \) and \(V_{m}\equiv mP \left( \text{ mod } \text { } P^{2}\right) \) by Lemma 9. This shows that \(nP\equiv 7mPx^{2} \left( \text{ mod } \text { }P^{2}\right) ,\) i.e., \(n\equiv 7mx^{2} \left( \text{ mod } \text { }P\right) .\) Since 7|P, it is obvious that 7|n. Since 7|n and \(n=mt,\) it is seen that 7|mt.
Assume that 7|t. Then \(t=7s\) for some odd positive integer s and therefore \(n=mt=7ms.\) By (2.18), we immediately have
by (2.18). This implies that 7 divides the parenthesis, i.e.,
Hence, we get \(x^{2}=\frac{V_{ms}}{V_{m}}\left( \frac{ V_{2ms}^{3}+V_{2ms}^{2}-2V_{2ms}-1}{7}\right) .\) We have,
Then
for some \(a,b>0.\) By Theorem 10, we have \(ms=3, m=1,\) and \(P=1\) or \( ms=m.\) If \(m=1\) and \(P=1,\) then, we see that \(V_{m}=V_{1}=P=1,\) which is impossible since \(V_{m}\ne 1.\) If \(ms=m,\) then, \(s=1.\) Since \(n=7ms,\) we get \(n=7m.\) By Theorem 2, it follows that
implying that
Since \(V_{4}\) is odd, it follows by (2.14) that \((U_{2m},V_{4})=1.\) But \(U_{2m}=U_{m}V_{m},\) by (2.9), hence \((V_{m},V_{4})=1.\) Therefore, the congruence becomes \(7x^{2}\equiv 1 (\text{ mod } V_{4}).\) Using the fact that 7|P, we have
a contradiction.
Now assume that \(7\not \mid t,\) so that 7|m. So, we can write \(m=7^{r}a\) with \( 7\not \mid a\) and \(r\ge 1.\) By (2.20), we get \( V_{m}=V_{7^{r}a}=7V_{7^{r-1}a}\left( 7a_{1}+1\right) \) for some positive integer \(a_{1}.\) Thus, we conclude that
for some \(a_{i}>0\) with \(1\le i\le r.\) Let \(A=\left( 7a_{1}+1\right) \left( 7a_{2}+1\right) \cdot \cdot \cdot \left( 7a_{r}+1\right) .\) As a consequence, \(V_{m}=7^{r}V_{a}A.\) It is clear that \(7\not \mid A.\) In a similar way, we see that
for some \(b_{j}>0\) with \(1\le j\le r.\) Thus, we have \(V_{n}=7^{r}V_{at}B,\) where \(B=\left( 7b_{1}+1\right) \left( 7b_{2}+1\right) \cdot \cdot \cdot \left( 7b_{r}+1\right) .\) Clearly, \(7\not \mid B.\) Upon substituting the values of \(V_{n}\) and \(V_{m}\) into \(V_{n}=7V_{m}x^{2},\) we obtain
implying that \(V_{at}B=7V_{a}Ax^{2}.\) By Lemma 9, it is seen that \( atPB\equiv 7aPAx^{2} \left( \text{ mod }\text { }P^{2}\right) ,\) which gives that \(atB\equiv 7aAx^{2} \left( \text{ mod } \text { }P\right) .\) Since 7|P, it follows that 7|atB. But this is impossible since \(7\not \mid a, 7\not \mid t,\) and \(7\not \mid B.\)
Case II: Assume that \(P^{2}\equiv 1 (\text{ mod } 7).\) From Lemma 6, it is seen that \(n=4t\) for some odd positive integer t. Therefore, we can write \(n=12q\) for some odd q or \(n=12q\pm 4\) for some even q. Firstly, let \(n=12q\). And so by (2.2), we get
Since \(U_{6}=P^{5}+4P^{3}+3P\) and P is odd, it is easily seen that \( 8|U_{6}.\) Hence, we have \(V_{n}\equiv 2\left( \text{ mod } \text { }8\right) .\) Secondly, let \(n=12q\pm 4.\) Then we immediately have from (2.2) that
implying that \(V_{n}\equiv V_{4} \left( \text{ mod } \text { }8\right) .\) Using the fact that \(V_{4}=P^{4}+4P^{2}+2\) and P is odd, we obtain \( V_{4}\equiv 7 \left( \text{ mod } \text { }8\right) \) in this case. Hence, we conclude that \(V_{n}\equiv 2,7 \left( \text{ mod } \text { }8\right) .\) On the other hand, since \(V_{m}|V_{n},\) we get \(n=ms\) for some odd s by (2.16). It is known that 4|n and s is odd. Hence, we see that 4|m and therefore \(m=4u\) for some odd u. And so, with arguments similar to those a few lines above, we have \(V_{m}\equiv 2,7 \left( \text{ mod } \text { } 8\right) .\) Thus, \(7V_{m}\equiv 14,49\equiv 6,1 \left( \text{ mod } \text { } 8\right) .\) As a consequence,
But this contradicts the fact that \(V_{n}\equiv 2,7 \left( \text{ mod } \text { }8\right) .\)
Case III: Assume that \(P^{2}\equiv 2 \left( \text{ mod } \text { }7\right) .\) Since \(7|V_{n},\) it follows from Lemma 6 that \(n=4t\) for some odd t. Furthermore, since \(V_{m}|V_{n},\) there exists an odd integer \(s(>1)\) such that \(n=ms\) by (2.16). Thus, we can write \(s=4q\pm 1\) for some \( q\ge 1.\) Since 4|n and s is odd, it is seen that m is even and also 4|m. Upon substituting \(n=ms\) and \(s=4q\pm 1\) into \(V_{n},\) we get
by (2.2). This implies that \(7V_{m}x^{2}\equiv V_{m} \left( \text{ mod } \text { }U_{m}V_{m}\right) \) by (2.9). Dividing both sides of the congruence by \(V_{m}\) gives \(7x^{2}\equiv 1\left( \text{ mod } \text {~} U_{m}\right) .\) Since 4|m, it is clear from (2.17) that \( U_{4}|U_{m}. \) Since \(U_{4}=U_{2}V_{2}\) by (2.9), the preceding congruence becomes \(7x^{2}\equiv 1 \left( \text{ mod } \text { }V_{2}\right) ,\) i.e.,
Assume that P is odd. Using \(P^{2}\equiv 2 \left( \text{ mod } \text { } 7\right) ,\) we get from (3.14) that
a contradiction. Now assume that P is even. If 2|P and \(4\not \mid P,\) then from (3.14), we obtain \(7x^{2}\equiv 1 \left( \text{ mod } \text { }\frac{P^{2}+2}{2}\right) ,\) implying that \(1=\left( \frac{7}{\left( P^{2}+2\right) /2}\right) .\) Since \(P^{2}\equiv 2 \left( \text{ mod } \text { } 7\right) ,\) it can be seen that \(\left( P^{2}+2\right) /2\equiv 2 \left( \text{ mod } \text { }7\right) .\) Hence, we get
a contradiction. For the case when 4|P, we turn back again to the congruence \(7x^{2}\equiv 1 \left( \text{ mod } \text { }U_{4}\right) .\) Since \( P|U_{4}\) we have \(7x^{2}\equiv 1 \left( \text{ mod } \text { }P\right) ,\) which implies that \(7x^{2}\equiv 1 \left( \text{ od } \text { }4\right) ,\) a contradiction.
Case IV: Assume that \(P^{2}\equiv 4 \left( \text{ mod } \text { }7\right) .\) Since \(7|V_{n},\) it follows from Lemma 6 that \(n=3t\) for some odd positive integer t. Moreover, since \(V_{m}|V_{n},\) it is obvious that \( n=ms \) for some odd \(s(>1)\) by (2.16). And so, we can write \(s=4q\pm 1\) with \(q\ge 1.\) Thus, we get \(n=ms=4qm\pm m.\) From now on, we divide the proof into two subcases.
Subcase i Let 3|m. Then by (2.17), \(U_{3}|U_{m}.\) Substituting \( n=4qm\pm m\) into \(V_{n}\) and using (2.2) and (2.9), we obtain \( V_{n}=V_{4qm\pm m}=V_{2\cdot 2mq\pm m}\equiv V_{\pm m}\left( \text{ mod } \text { }U_{m}V_{m}\right) ,\) i.e., \(7x^{2}\equiv \pm 1 \left( \text{ mod } \text { } U_{m}\right) .\) Since \(U_{3}|U_{m}\) and \(U_{3}=P^{2}+1,\) we conclude that
It is clear from (3.15) that \(7x^{2}\equiv \pm 1 \left( \text{ mod } \text { }\frac{P^{2}+1}{2}\right) .\) Let \(7x^{2}\equiv 1 \left( \text{ mod } \text { } \frac{P^{2}+1}{2}\right) .\) This shows that \(1=\left( \frac{7}{\left( P^{2}+1\right) /2}\right) .\) Since \(P^{2}\equiv 4 \left( \text{ mod } \text { } 7\right) ,\) it follows that \(\frac{P^{2}+1}{2}\equiv -1 \left( \text{ mod } \text { }7\right) .\) Hence, we get
a contradiction. Similarly \(7x^{2}\equiv -1 \left( \text{ mod } \text { }\frac{ P^{2}+1}{2}\right) \) leads to a contradiction.
Subcase ii Let \(3\not \mid m.\) Since 3|n and \(n=ms,\) it follows that 3|s and therefore \(s=3k\) for some odd k. Thus, we get \(n=ms=3mk.\) Substituting this into \(V_{n}\) gives \(V_{n}=V_{3mk}=V_{mk}\left( V_{mk}^{2}+3\right) \) by (2.11). This implies that \(7V_{m}x^{2}=V_{mk}\left( V_{mk}^{2}+3\right) ,\) i.e., \(7x^{2}=\frac{V_{mk}}{V_{m}}\left( V_{mk}^{2}+3\right) .\) Clearly, \(d=\left( \frac{V_{mk}}{V_{m}} ,V_{mk}^{2}+3\right) =1\) or 3.
Let \(d=1.\) Then either
or
for some \(a,b>0.\) We immediately see that (3.17) does not hold. Because the only possible value of \(V_{mk}\) for which \(V_{mk}^{2}+3=b^{2}\) is \(V_{mk}=1,\) which is impossible. Assume that (3.16) holds. Then by Theorem 10, we obtain \(mk=3, m=1,\) and \(P=1\) or \(mk=m.\) If \(mk=3\) and \(P=1,\) then, \(V_{mk}^{2}+3=V_{3}^{2}+3=(P^{3}+3P)^{2}+3 =19=7b^{2},\) which is impossible. If \(mk=m,\) then, \(k=1.\) So, it is sufficient to consider the equation \(V_{m}^{2}+3=7b^{2}.\) From (2.10), it follows that \(V_{2m}+1=7b^{2}.\) Assume that \(m>1.\) Since m is odd, we can write \( 2m=2\left( 4q\pm 1\right) =2\left( 2^{r}z\right) \pm 2\) with z odd and \( r\ge 2.\) Then by (2.4),
implying that
This means that \(1=\left( \frac{-7U_{3}}{V_{2^{r}}}\right) .\) We have \( \left( \frac{-1}{V_{2^{r}}}\right) =-1\) and \(\left( \frac{U_{3}}{V_{2^{r}}} \right) =1\) by (2.21) and (2.15), respectively. On the other hand, it is easy to see that \(V_{2^{r}}\equiv 6 \left( \text{ mod } \text { }7\right) \) when \(P^{2}\equiv 4 \left( \text{ mod } \text { }7\right) .\) Thus, we get
This concludes that \(1=\left( \frac{-7U_{3}}{V_{2^{r}}}\right) =\left( \frac{ -1}{V_{2^{r}}}\right) \left( \frac{7}{V_{2^{r}}}\right) \left( \frac{U_{3}}{ V_{2^{r}}}\right) =(-1)(1)(1)=-1,\) a contradiction. Hence, \(m=1\) and therefore \(n=3m=3.\) It is clear that \(m=1\) and \(n=3\) is a solution by Lemma 8.
Let \(d=3.\) Then, we obtain
or
for some \(a,b>0.\) Assume that (3.18) is satisfied. Then, by Theorem 3.7 given in [11], the only possible values of mk and m for which \(V_{mk}=3V_{m}a^{2}\) are \(mk=3\) and \(m=1.\) This implies that \( V_{3}^{2}+3=21b^{2}.\) Thus, we get \(V_{3}^{2}\equiv 4 \left( \text{ mod } \text { }7\right) .\) This is impossible since \(7|V_{3}.\) Now assume that (3.19) is satisfied. Since \(3|V_{mk}\) and mk is odd, it is seen that 3|P by Lemma 5. On the other hand, \(V_{mk}^{2}=V_{2mk}-2\) by (2.10). Combining the equations \(V_{mk}^{2}=V_{2mk}-2\) and \( V_{mk}^{2}+3=3b^{2},\) we get \(V_{2mk}=3b^{2}-1.\) Let \(mk=4q\pm 1=2^{r}z\pm 1\) with odd z and \(r\ge 2.\) And so by (2.4), we obtain
implying that
This shows that \(1=\left( \frac{-3U_{3}}{V_{2^{r}}}\right) .\) We have \( \left( \frac{-1}{V_{2^{r}}}\right) =-1\) by (2.21), \(\left( \frac{U_{3}}{ V_{2^{r}}}\right) =1\) by (2.15), and \(V_{2^{r}}\equiv 2 \left( \text{ mod }\text { }3\right) \) by (2.13). Thus,
Combining the above, we see that
a contradiction. This completes the proof. \(\square \)
Theorem 16
If P is odd, then \(U_{n}=7x^{2}\) is possible if and only if \( P=7\square \) and \(n=2.\)
Proof
Assume that \(U_{n}=7x^{2}\) for some \(x>0.\) Since \(7|U_{n}, n=2t\) for some positive integer t by Lemma 7. And so by (2.9), we get \( U_{n}=U_{2t}=U_{t}V_{t}=7x^{2}.\) Clearly, \(\left( U_{t},V_{t}\right) =1\) or 2 by (2.14).
Let \(\left( U_{t},V_{t}\right) =1.\) Then either
or
for some \(a,b>0.\) Assume that (3.20) is satisfied. Then by Theorem 14, the possible values of t for which \(V_{t}=7x^{2}\) are \(t=1\) when 7|P and \(t=4,P=1\) when \(P^{2}\equiv 1 ( \text{ mod } 7).\) If \(t=1,\) then \( n=2\) and therefore \(P=7\square \) is a solution. If \(t=4\) and \(P=1,\) then \( U_{4}=P^{3}+2P=3=a^{2},\) which is impossible in integers. Now assume that ( 3.21) is satisfied. Since \(7|U_{t},\) it is seen from Lemma 7 that t is even. Let \(t=2m.\) Then by (2.10), we see that \( b^{2}=V_{t}=V_{2m}=V_{m}^{2}\pm 2,\) which is impossible.
Let \(\left( U_{t},V_{t}\right) =2.\) Then either
or
for some \(a,b>0.\) According to Theorem 13, (3.22) cannot hold. Assume that (3.23) is satisfied. Then by Theorem 2 given in [2] and [4], we have \(t=6\) and \(P=1,5.\) But this is also impossible. For, otherwise we would have \(14a^{2}=U_{6}=U_{3}V_{3}=\left( P^{2}+1\right) \left( P^{3}+3P\right) \) which is impossible for \(P=1,5.\) This completes the proof. \(\square \)
Theorem 17
Let P be odd, \(m>1\) and \(U_{m}\ne 1.\) The equation \( U_{n}=7U_{m}x^{2}\) has solution only when \(P^{2}\equiv 1 ( \text{ mod } 7),\) in which case, the only solution is given by \((n,m,P,x)=(8,4,1,1).\)
Proof
Assume that \(U_{n}=7U_{m}x^{2}\) with \(m>1.\) Since \(U_{m}|U_{n},\) it follows from (2.17) that m|n. Thus, \(n=mt\) for some positive integer t. It is easy to see that \(n\ne m.\) Then, we have \(t>1.\) On the other hand, since \(7|U_{n},\) it is seen that n is even by Lemma 7. Since n is even and \(n=mt,\) either m or t is even.
Case I: t is even. Then \(t=2s\) for some \(s>0.\) By (2.9), we have \( U_{n}=U_{2ms}=U_{ms}V_{ms}=7U_{m}x^{2}.\) This yields that \(\left( U_{ms}/U_{m}\right) V_{ms}=7x^{2}.\) Clearly, \(\left( U_{ms}/U_{m},V_{ms}\right) =1\) or 2 by (2.14). If \(\left( U_{ms}/U_{m},V_{ms}\right) =1,\) then either
or
for some positive integers a and b. By Theorem 14, (3.24) is impossible when \(P^{2}\equiv 2 ( \text{ mod } 7)\) or \(P^{2}\equiv 4 ( \text{ mod } 7).\) If 7|P, then by Theorem 14, we have \(ms=1.\) But this contradicts the fact that \(m>1.\) If \(P^{2}\equiv 1 ( \text{ mod } 7),\) then by Theorem 14, it follows that \(ms=4\) and \(P=1.\) Since \(m>1,\) we get \(m=4, s=1\) or \(m=2, s=2.\) Let \(m=4, s=1.\) Since \(t=2s\) and \( n=mt,\) we get \(n=8.\) Hence, \(U_{8}=7U_{4}x^{2},\) implying by (2.9) that \(V_{4}=7x^{2}.\) Since \(P=1,\) we obtain \(x=1.\) So, \((n,m,P,x)=(8,4,1,1)\) is a solution. Now, let \(m=2, s=2.\) Then we readily obtain \(n=8\) and therefore \(U_{8}=7U_{2}x^{2}.\) By (2.9), it follows that \( V_{2}V_{4}=7x^{2}.\) Since \(7|V_{4},\) we get \(V_{2}\frac{V_{4}}{7}=x^{2}.\) Clearly, \(\left( V_{2},\frac{V_{4}}{7}\right) =1\) by (2.14) and (2.12). Then \(V_{2}=a^{2}, V_{4}=7b^{2}\) for some \(a,b>0.\) Since \(P=1,\) there is no integer a such that \(V_{2}=P^{2}+2=3=a^{2}.\)
If (3.25 ) holds, then by Theorem 1 given in [2] and [4], we have \(ms=3\) and \(P=1\) or 3. Since \(m>1\) and \(ms=3,\) it follows that \( m=3.\) This implies that \(U_{3}=7U_{3}x^{2},\) which is impossible.
If \(\left( U_{ms}/U_{m},V_{ms}\right) =2,\) then either
or
Clearly, (3.26) is excluded by Theorem 13. Suppose (3.27) is satisfied. Then by Theorem 2 given in [2] and [4], we have \(ms=6\) and \(P=1,5.\) Since \(m>1,\) it follows that \(m=2,3\) or 6. If \( m=2,\) then \(U_{6}=14U_{2}a^{2},\) implying that \(\left( P^{2}+1\right) \left( P^{2}+3\right) =14a^{2}\) which is impossible in integers for the case when \( P=1,5.\) If \(m=3,\) then \(U_{6}=14U_{3}a^{2},\) implying that \(\left( P^{3}+3P\right) =14a^{2},\) which is impossible. Lastly, if \(m=6,\) then \( U_{6}=14U_{6}a^{2},\) implying that \(1=14a^{2},\) which is also impossible.
Case II: t is odd. Since \(n=mt\) and n is even, it follows that m is even. Let \(m=2s.\) Then \(n=2st\) and so by (2.9), we get \( U_{n}=U_{2st}=U_{st}V_{st}=7U_{2st}x^{2}=7U_{st}V_{st}x^{2}.\) This implies that \(\frac{U_{st}}{U_{s}}\frac{V_{st}}{V_{s}}=7x^{2}.\) Clearly, \(d=\left( \frac{U_{st}}{U_{s}},\frac{V_{st}}{V_{s}}\right) =1\) or 2.
Let \(d=1.\) Then either
or
Suppose (3.28) is satisfied. Then by Theorem 15, we get \(s=1\) and \(st=3.\) This implies that \(U_{3}=U_{1}a^{2},\) that is \(P^{2}+1=a^{2},\) which is impossible. Suppose (3.29) is satisfied. Then by Theorem 10, we obtain \(st=3, s=1,\) and \(P=1\) or \(st=s.\) If \(st=3, s=1,\) and \(P=1,\) then from \(U_{st}=7U_{s}a^{2},\) we have \(U_{3}=7U_{1}a^{2},\) leading to \( 2=7a^{2}, \) which is impossible. If \(st=s,\) then again from \( U_{st}=7U_{s}a^{2},\) we have \(1=7a^{2},\) which is impossible.
Let \(d=2.\) Then either
or
Assume that (3.30) is satisfied. Then, by Theorem 6 given in [9], the only possible values of P, st, and s for which \( U_{st}=2U_{s}a^{2}\) are \(st=3, s=2, P=1; st=6, s=2, P=1; st=12, s=3, P=1; st=12, s=6, P=1;\) or \(st=12, s=6, P=5.\) A simple computation shows that \(V_{st}=14V_{s}b^{2}\) is impossible under all the conditions that when \(P=1.\) If \(P=5,\) then, this is impossible for the case when 7|P or if \(P^{2}\equiv 1,2 \left( \text{ mod } \text { }7\right) .\) On the other hand, since \(7|V_{st},\) it follows from Lemma 6 that \( st=3r \) with r odd for the case when \(P^{2}\equiv 4 \left( \text{ mod } \text { }7\right) .\) This means that st is odd. But this contradicts the fact that \(st=12\) is even. Assume that (3.31) is satisfied. Then by Theorem 12 given in [9], we get \(s=1\) and \(P=1.\) Since \( m=2s,\) it follows that \(m=2.\) Substituting this value of m into \( U_{n}=7U_{m}x^{2}\) gives \(U_{n}=7U_{2}x^{2}=7x^{2}.\) By Theorem 16, the equation \(U_{n}=7x^{2}\) is possible if and only if \(n=2.\) As a consequence \(m=2\) and \(n=2.\) But this is impossible since \(n\ne m.\) This completes the proof. \(\square \)
References
Ribenboim, P.: My Numbers, My Friends. Springer-Verlag, New York (2000)
Cohn, J.H.E.: Eight Diophantine equations. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 16(3), 153–166 (1966)
Cohn, J.H.E.: Five Diophantine equations. Math. Scand. 21, 61–70 (1967)
Ribenboim, P., McDaniel, W.L.: The square terms in Lucas sequences. J. Number Theory 58, 104–123 (1996)
Ribenboim ,P., McDaniel, W.L.: On Lucas sequences terms of the form \(kx^{2}\). In: Number Theory: Proceedings of the Turku Symposium on Number Theory in Memory of Kustaa Inkeri (Turku, 1999), Walter de Gruyter (Berlin, 2001), pp. 293–303
Bremner, A., Tzanakis, N.: Lucas sequences whose 12th or 9th term is a square. J. Number Theory 107, 215–227 (2004)
Bremner, A., Tzanakis, N.: On squares in Lucas sequences. J. Number Theory 124, 511–520 (2007)
Bremner, A., Tzanakis, N.: Lucas sequences whose \(nth\) term is a square or an almost square. Acta Arith. 126, 261–280 (2007)
Cohn, J.H.E.: Squares in some recurrent sequences. Pacific J. Math. 41, 631–646 (1972)
McDaniel, W.L., Ribenboim, P.: Square classes in Lucas sequences having odd parameters. J. Number Theory 73, 14–27 (1998)
Şiar, Z., Keskin, R.: The square terms in generalized Lucas sequences. Mathematika 60, 85–100 (2014)
Keskin, R., Karaatlı, O.: Generalized Fibonacci and Lucas numbers of the form \(5x^{2},\) Int. J. Number Theory 11(3), 931–944 (2015)
Şiar, Z., Keskin, R.: Some new identities concerning generalized Fibonacci and Lucas numbers. Hacet. J. Math. Stat. 42(3), 211–222 (2013)
Ribenboim, P., McDaniel, W.L.: Squares in Lucas sequences having an even first parameter. Colloq. Math. 78, 29–34 (1998)
McDaniel, W.L.: The g.c.d in Lucas sequences and Lehmer number sequences. Fibonacci Quart. 29, 24–30 (1991)
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to extend their sincere thanks to the anonymous referees for their extremely careful reading, helpful comments, and suggestions that improved the presentation of the paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Dr. Miin Huey Ang.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Karaatlı, O., Keskin, R. On The Lucas Sequence Equations \(V_{n}=7\square \) and \(V_{n}=7V_{m}\square \) . Bull. Malays. Math. Sci. Soc. 41, 335–353 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40840-015-0295-x
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40840-015-0295-x