1 Introduction

Hydrogen-free amorphous carbon generally called as a tetrahedral amorphous carbon (ta-C) contains high fraction of sp 3 content, and this carbon is known as hydrogenated amorphous carbon (ta-C:H) when it is hydrogenated [1, 2]. The ta-C and ta-C:H have been used as coating materials and show interesting properties such as high hardness, chemical inertness and wear resistance because of high sp 3 content [1,2,3,4,5] leading to its wide range of applications including optical, mechanical and electronics [6,7,8]. Their beneficial properties arise from sp 3 content of their bonding, and these carbons are frequently called diamond-like carbon (DLC). This coating has widely been prepared by filtered cathodic vacuum arc techniques for industrial and laboratory scale. It provides highly ionized plasma and high deposition rate of high tetrahedrally bonded amorphous carbon coating [9,10,11,12,13]. However, high residual stress in amorphous carbon limits the coating thickness which leads to poor adhesion to the substrate, resulting in the peeling off of the coating or delaminating. These problems can be overcome by metal incorporation into the coating and multilayered coating [14, 15]. It has also been found that incorporation of metals in amorphous carbon is one of the effective ways to enhance its mechanical and tribological properties. Recently, numerous metal dopants such as Ti, Mo, W, Si, Cr and Al have been used to enhance the properties of the ta-C coatings [16, 17]. Among these dopant elements, Ti has much attention in industrial and laboratory sectors because of the good adhesion with all substrates and easy reaction with carbon [18]. Ti-incorporated carbon surface acts as a diffusion barrier for impeding the diffusion of oxygen into the sublayer [19], thus preventing the incursion and destruction of oxygen to the crosslinked carbon network. Titanium-incorporated DLC coatings have extensively been studied by many researchers. Zhao et al., Cui et al. and Qiang et al. have demonstrated that diamond-like carbon coatings with different concentrations of titanium show superior tribological performance [20,21,22]. However, higher concentration of titanium leads to break up the continuity of the carbon network in coating resulting in lower hardness [23,24,25].

Several techniques are available to deposit amorphous carbon coatings such as filtered cathodic vacuum arc (FCVA) [24,25,26], filtered pulsed arc discharge (FPAD) [27], sputtering deposition [28], plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) [29,30,31], metal vapor vacuum arc (MeVVA) [32,33,34] and plasma source ion implantation (PSII) [35]. In this study, Ti/ta-C multilayered coating has been deposited by combination of unfiltered cathodic arc evaporation and magnetron sputtering. The coating has been characterized by FESEM, EDS, AFM, Raman spectroscopy and XPS. Corrosion and wear behaviors of the coating have also been investigated.

2 Materials and Methods

2.1 Preparation of Substrates

In the present work, silicon wafers (100) and glass slides were cut into appropriate sizes and cleaned in acetone ultrasonically. These samples were used for thickness measurement, nanohardness testing, Raman spectroscopy and XPS studies. Stainless steel (SS) 202 sheets were cut into 2.5 × 2.5 cm2 pieces, and they were ground by different grit sized silicon carbide emery papers to smoothen the surface and then polished by 0.3 μm alumina powder mixed with distilled water to get mirror-like finish. The polished stainless steel samples were then ultrasonically cleaned for 20 min in acetone and then loaded in the vacuum chamber for coating deposition. These samples were used for corrosion and wear studies.

2.2 Deposition of Ti/ta-C Multilayered Coating

Ti/ta-C multilayered coating was deposited with combination of cathodic arc evaporation and magnetron sputtering. The deposition chamber was made of stainless steel. The chamber was evacuated to base vacuum of 5.7 × 10−6 mbar by a turbomolecular pump backed by a rotary pump. After the base pressure was reached, the chamber and gas lines were purged with argon and hydrogen gas. These gases were introduced into the chamber by a showerhead-type distributor, and flow rates were controlled by mass flow controllers (MSK Instruments, USA) and a throttle valve. Prior to deposition, the surfaces of the silicon and stainless steel (SS 202) substrates were etched with hydrogen plasma for 20 min with substrate bias of −110 V. Ti deposition over ta-C coating was carried out in the same vacuum system. The vacuum chamber consists of magnetron sputtering head with titanium target of 3 in. diameter and 6 mm thickness. A graphite target of 3 in. diameter was used for cathodic arc evaporation (CAE) for the deposition of tetrahedral amorphous carbon coating. Magnetron sputtering and CAE were employed alternatively to deposit multilayered coatings consisting of Ti and ta-C layers. Sputter deposition was carried by 10 sscm of Ar gas with 350 V bias voltage, and constant 80 A arc current was applied to the cathodic arc target. Negative bias of −110 V DC was applied to substrate via substrate holder.

2.3 Characterization

The thickness of Ti/ta-C multilayered coating deposited on glass substrate was measured by NanoMap500LS profilometer. FESEM image of the coating was obtained using Carl Zeiss SUPRA 40VP, and elemental analysis was performed by EDS using IncaPentaFETx3 from Oxford Instruments attached to the FESEM. Surface topography was investigated by AFM with CSEM Instruments (Model SSI) operated in contact mode. Raman spectroscopy of the coating was carried out by confocal micro-Raman spectrometer using DILOR-JOBIN-YVON SPEX (LABRAM 010A) with He–Ne laser source having wave length of 632.8 nm. XPS of multilayered coating was recorded with a SPECS spectrometer, Germany, using non-monochromatic AlKα radiation (1486.6 eV) as an X-ray source operated at 150 W (12 kV, 12.5 mA). The binding energies reported here were referenced with C1s peak at 284.6 eV. All the individual spectra were recorded with a pass energy and step increment of 40 and 0.05 eV, respectively. For XPS recording, the sample was mounted on a sample holder and placed into a load-lock chamber with an ultrahigh vacuum (UHV) of 8 × 10−8 mbar for 5 h in order to desorb any volatile species present on the surface. After 5 h, the sample was transferred into the analyzing chamber with UHV of 5 × 10−10 mbar and spectra were recorded. Before collecting spectra, surface of the coating was sputtered mildly as oxidized species can be formed on the surface layer in course of deposition process.

2.4 Properties

Nanohardness of the multilayered coating was measured by Nano Hardness Tester (CSM Instruments) with a Berkovich diamond indenter at 1 and 2 mN loads.

Electrochemical studies were performed in 3.5% NaCl solution on bare SS 202 substrate and multilayered Ti-incorporated ta-C samples at 37 ± 1° C. The test was conducted using CH 604 D electrochemical workstation (CH Instruments, USA) and a conventional three-electrode cell consisting of saturated calomel electrode (SCE), Pt and coated and uncoated SS sample as reference, counter and working electrodes, respectively. In order to get steady-state potential, samples were immersed in 3.5% NaCl solution for 1 h and continuously monitored. Electrochemical measurements have resulted in Tafel plot which is represented as log i versus potential plot. The corrosion potential (E corr) and corrosion current density (i corr) are obtained from the Tafel plot. The corrosion rates (CR) of substrate and multilayered coating were evaluated using following equation [36, 37]:

$$ {\text{CR}} = \frac{{K \times i_{\text{corr}} \times {\text{EW}}}}{\rho } $$
(1)

where CR, K, i corr, EW and ρ are corrosion rate in mils per year (mpy), constant that defines the unit of the corrosion rate, corrosion current density in A cm−2 and density in g cm−3, respectively. The value of K is 0.13. The equivalent weight (EW) of SS is 20.43 g eq−1. The density of corroding species which is SS in the present study is 7.9 g cm−3. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) of substrate and coated samples was carried out in 3.5% NaCl solution over a frequency range of 10 mHz to 100 kHz with sinusoidal perturbation potential amplitude of 10 mV on the E OCP. After each experiment, the impedance data were displayed as Bode plots. The Bode plot is a plot of |Z| versus f and phase angle (θ) versus f where |Z| and f are absolute impedance and frequency, respectively. The acquired data were curve-fitted and analyzed using ZSimpwin program (Princeton Applied Research, USA) to obtain suitable equivalent circuit parameters. The detailed procedure of electrochemical studies and their analyses have been reported elsewhere [38,39,40].

Wear studies were carried out in a reciprocating-type wear tester (model CM 9084 DuCom) according to ASTM G133-02 standard [41]. However, these tests are not in full compliance with the provisions of Test Method G 133, Procedure A, because the normal forces in these experiments were 2, 5, 7 and 10 N instead of 25 N as prescribed by the standard. Also, the stroke length was 10 mm and an alumina ball of 6 mm diameter was used as the counter surface. Further, the experiments were carried out at a frequency of 100 Hz, and duration of each experiment was 20 min. After the experiments, the samples were examined for wear profile by a profilometer. The wear loss was calculated from the cross-sectional area of the wear profile according to ASTM G133-02 method [41].

3 Results and Discussion

3.1 Thickness, Surface Morphology and Chemical Composition

The thickness of Ti/ta-C multilayered coating has been evaluated from profilometry by masking a small portion of the glass substrate. The obtained total thickness of the coating is 936 nm, and approximate individual thicknesses of the titanium and tetrahedral amorphous carbon layers are less than 10 and ~30 nm, respectively.

Figure 1a shows surface morphology of Ti/ta-C multilayered coating on silicon substrate by FESEM. The non-homogeneous surface is observed over the coating with macrodroplets whose sizes approximately vary from 50 to 220 nm range, and it might be emitted from graphite target during the deposition. Figure 1b displays the typical cross-sectional view of the multilayered Ti-incorporated ta-C coating which consists of dark and thin bright layers corresponding to tetrahedral amorphous carbon and titanium layers.

Fig. 1
figure 1

FESEM images of Ti/ta-C multilayered coating: a surface morphology and b cross-sectional view of the multilayer

The chemical composition of Ti/ta-C multilayered coating has been deduced by EDS. Titanium and carbon concentrations are 9.44 and 90.56 at%, respectively, in the multilayered coating.

3.2 Surface Roughness

The surface topography of the Ti/ta-C multilayered coating is shown in Fig. 2 as three-dimensional (3D) AFM image. The AFM image reveals that coated sample has rough surface with macrodroplets. It has been observed that macrodroplets are not in same size. The average surface roughness (R a ) and root mean square surface roughness (R q ) values have been calculated using the following formulas [42]:

Fig. 2
figure 2

Surface topography of Ti/ta-C multilayered coating

$$ R_{a} = \frac{1}{L}\mathop \smallint \limits_{0}^{L} \left| {Z\left( x \right)} \right|{\text{d}}x $$
(2)
$$ R_{q} = \sqrt {\frac{1}{L}\mathop \smallint \limits_{0}^{L} \left| {Z(x)} \right|^{2} {\text{d}}x} $$
(3)

where Z(x) is a function that describes the surface profile analyzed in terms of height (Z) and position (x) of the sample over evaluation length L. The observed average roughness and root mean square roughness values of the multilayered coating are 21 and 36 nm, respectively, over an area of 10.0 × 10.0 μm2.

3.3 Raman Spectroscopy Studies

Figure 3 shows Raman spectrum of multilayered coating in the range of 900–1800 cm−1 range. The broad spectrum of the coating is deconvoluted into four Gaussian peaks in order to get good fit of the DLC coating [43]. The Raman spectrum consists of D and G bands located at 1345 and 1573 cm−1, respectively. The D and G bands are attributed to the bond angle disorder of the sp 2 band and E 2g symmetric vibration mode of the sp 2 band [44, 45]. ID/IG ratio is significantly used to evaluate the degree of disorder in the carbon network in the coating. However, Li et al. have observed that more layers have lower ID/IG value due to less sp 2 sites conversion process at thinner sublayers [46]. In the present work, the ID/IG value (obtained from integral areas under the D and G bands) of the coating is approximately 0.51.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Raman spectrum of Ti/ta-C multilayered coating

3.4 XPS Studies

XPS of Ti/ta-C multilayered coating has been carried out to understand the surface nature of the coating. Oxidation states of constituent elements and concentrations of several component species of respective elements have been evaluated from the XPS that would reflect the characteristics of the coating. Broad and asymmetrical envelopes of C1s and Ti2p core level spectra of Ti/ta-C multilayer coating indicate the presence of multiple species of carbon and titanium in the coating. Accordingly, they are decomposed into different component species. In Fig. 4, curve-fitted C1s and Ti2p core level spectra of the multilayered coating are presented. Observed peaks at 282.2, 284.4 and 285.2 eV in the layer correspond to titanium carbide, sp 2C (C=C) and sp 3C (C–C), respectively [39, 47]. Component peaks observed at 286.8 and 289.7 eV are attributed to C–O and CO3 2− species, respectively [48, 49]. Relative amounts of carbidic carbon, sp 2C, sp 3C, C–O and CO3 2− are 8.8, 28.6, 46.1, 12.2 and 4.3%, respectively. Ti2p core level spectrum is also resolved into sets of spin–orbit doublet peaks. Ti2p 3/2,1/2 peaks observed at 454.9 and 461.2 eV in the curve-fitted spectrum are assigned for Ti carbide species. Observed doublet peaks at 457.1 and 463.1 and 458.4 and 464.6 eV stand for oxidized Ti3+ and Ti4+ species, respectively. All these values for Ti carbide, Ti3+ and Ti4+ species are close to the values reported in the literature [39, 47, 50]. Comparing the intensity of Ti carbide-, Ti3+- and Ti4+-related peaks in the curve-fitted spectrum, it has to be noted that around 41% of total Ti is present as Ti carbide form, 29% of Ti is in Ti3+ form, and 30% of Ti is in Ti4+ species in Ti/ta-C multilayered coating. Thus, XPS studies demonstrate the presence of Ti carbide and oxidized Ti species and different carbon species in the surface of the multilayered coating.

Fig. 4
figure 4

XPS of C1s and Ti2p core levels of Ti/ta-C multilayered coating

3.5 Nanoindentation Studies

The mechanical property of the Ti/ta-C multilayered coating is shown in Fig. 5 as a load and displacement curve. The hardness and elastic modulus are evaluated from nanoindentation tests at different places under 1 and 2 mN loads in order to check uniformity of the coating. It has been noticed that due to macrodroplet and non-homogenous surfaces, the hardness and Young’s modulus vary place to place. The average hardness at 1 mN load is 15.6 ± 1.7 and 17 ± 3.6 GPa for 2 mN load, and values of Young’s modulus are 146.8 and 189.1 GPa at 1 and 2 mN loads, respectively. Maximum penetration depth is 97 nm at 2 mN load.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Load versus displacement curves of Ti/ta-C multilayered coating

3.6 Corrosion Studies

The corrosion studies have been carried out on SS 202 substrate and Ti/ta-C multilayered coated SS 202 substrate in 3.5% NaCl solution. The potentiodynamic polarization curves of the SS substrate and Ti-incorporated ta-C sample are presented in Fig. 6. The electrochemical parameters, namely corrosion potential (E corr), corrosion current density (i corr) and corrosion rate, were obtained for SS 202 substrate and multilayered ta-C coated samples. The corrosion current density (i corr) and corrosion potential (E corr) were deduced from the Tafel plot. The corrosion rates are calculated from Eq. (1). The observed i corr values are 0.05 and 0.02 μA cm−2 for SS 202 substrate and multilayered coated sample, respectively. Figure 6 shows that corrosion potential value of multilayered sample is shifted to more positive value of −0.038 V compared to that of −0.163 V for SS 202 substrate. Therefore, Ti/ta-C shows better corrosion resistance characteristics as compared to the uncoated SS 202 substrate. Corrosion rates of SS 202 substrate and multilayered coated substrate sample are 0.017 and 0.007 mpy, respectively. This indicates the enhanced corrosion resistance behavior of the multilayered coating.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Potentiodynamic polarization curves for a SS 202 substrate and b Ti/ta-C multilayered coating samples

Results obtained from EIS with 3.5% NaCl solution are shown in Fig. 7a in the form of Bode plots. For uncoated SS 202 substrate, there is a small change in phase angle occurring from −10o to 0o in the high-frequency range of 10–100 kHz. In the mid-frequency range from 1 to 100 Hz, the phase angle is nearly constant around −80° and decreases to −55o at low-frequency range (0.01–1 Hz), which is less than −90o, the value for an ideal capacitor. In the case of multilayered Ti/ta-C-coated sample in Fig. 7b, the phase angle in the frequency range of 0.1–1000 Hz is −80o and decreases to −75o in the lower-frequency range. However, in order to get EIS parameters, impedance data are fitted with equivalent circuit (EC) diagram. EC is used for understanding the physical process taking place in the system under investigation. Multilayered coated sample and uncoated sample (SS 202) have same two-time-constant equivalent circuit diagram which is presented in Fig. 7c. The EC diagram consists of R s , R 1 and R 2 representing the solution resistance, outer pores layer resistance and inner layer resistance, respectively. Q 1 represents the capacitance of the outer layer and Q 2 represents the capacitance of the inner layer. The values of the electrical parameters obtained by fitting the impedance data of the substrate and multilayered coating are given in Table 1. The resistance of outer porous layer (R 1) of the substrate is 15.67 Ω cm2. High corrosion resistance associated with inner oxide layer on the substrate (R 2) is 9.16 × 105 Ω cm2. The value of N for the constant phase element representing the outer layer is 0.67 and that is 0.94 for inner layer. In the case of titanium-incorporated ta-C sample, the outer layer resistance (R 1) is 5.88 × 105 Ω cm2 and inner layer resistance (R 2) is 8.88 × 107 Ω cm2 which are higher than the uncoated SS substrate. Thus, multilayered coating demonstrates good corrosion resistance compared to that of uncoated substrate.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Bode plots of a SS 202 substrate and b Ti/ta-C multilayered coating samples, and c equivalent circuits (EC)

Table 1 Electrochemical impedance parameters obtained by fitting equivalent circuit model for SS substrate and multilayered Ti/ta-C coated samples

3.7 Wear Studies

The wear behaviors of substrate (SS 202) and Ti/ta-C multilayered coating have been evaluated by reciprocating wear test against with 6 mm Al2O3 ball. The wear tests have been carried out at room temperature (relative humidity of 65%) without any lubricant medium. In order to evaluate the coefficient of friction (COF) of the uncoated and coated samples, wear tests have been conducted at different loads such as 2, 5, 7 and 10 N. Figure 8 shows the coefficient of the friction of substrate and coated samples with different applied loads as a function of testing time. Figure 8 shows that, for bare substrate, the friction coefficient possesses stable values of 0.72, 0.72, 0.69 and 0.70 at 2, 5, 7 and 10 N loads, respectively, over time. In the case of Ti/ta-C multilayered coating, the coefficient of friction shows almost constant values of 0.07, 0.08, 0.08 and 0.2 at 2, 5, 7 and 10 N loads, respectively. Figure 9 presents the average coefficient of friction values of bare SS 202 substrate and Ti/ta-C multilayered coating as a function of load.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Coefficient of friction (COF) versus testing time on SS 202 substrate and Ti/ta-C multilayered coating samples at 2, 5, 7 and 10 N loads

Fig. 9
figure 9

Plots of COF versus load and wear volume versus load over substrate and Ti/ta-C multilayered coating

In order to calculate wear volume of bare substrate and coated samples, 3D and 2D profilometries have been carried out on the wear tracks of 2, 5, 7 and 10 N loads on substrate and Ti/ta-C multilayered coated samples. Figure 10 shows the 3D images of the wear tracks of substrate and Ti/ta-C multilayered coating. It can be seen from the figures that the wear profiles on the substrate have deep grooves while the wear tracks on the Ti/ta-C multilayered coated samples have less deep. The average wear volumes calculated from wear profiles of substrate and multilayered coating are also shown in Fig. 9. In the case of substrate, the wear volumes are 0.0005, 0.0003, 0.0007 and 0.00115 mm3 at 2, 5, 7 and 10 N loads, respectively. However, in the case of Ti/ta-C multilayered coating, the wear volumes are 0.00003, 0.00004, 0.00007 and 0.00010 mm3 at 2, 5, 7 and 10 N loads, respectively. Compared to uncoated substrate, Ti/ta-C multilayered coated sample shows very low COF values as well as wear volumes and wear marks are also shallower. Thus, Ti/ta-C multilayered coating reduces the wear volumes.

Fig. 10
figure 10

3D profiles of wear tracks at 2, 5, 7 and 10 N loads on SS 202 substrate and Ti/ta-C multilayered coating samples

4 Conclusions

Ti/ta-C multilayered coating has been deposited by combination of magnetron sputtering and cathodic arc evaporation alternatively on silicon, glass and stainless steel (SS 202) substrates. Obtained coating thickness is ~936 nm. Raman spectroscopy studies show the features of DLC coating. XPS studies show the presence of titanium carbide species in the coating along with oxidized species. Average hardness values of 15.6 ± 1.7 and 17 ± 3.6 GPa at 1 and 2 mN loads are obtained in the coating. The electrochemical studies demonstrate that the Ti/ta-C multilayered coating exhibits better corrosion resistance compared to that of the SS 202 substrate. Wear studies show that Ti/ta-C multilayered coated substrate has very low coefficient of friction and low wear volumes at 2, 5, 7 and 10 N loads studied in the present work.