Abstract
The kidney is frequently involved by autoimmune rheumatic diseases. The renal manifestations may be variable, ranging from asymptomatic proteinuria and microscopic haematuria to nephrotic syndrome and rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis or vasculitis. In a number of cases the kidney involvement is related to the treatment of the original disease and may represent a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Thus, it is important for nephrologists and rheumatologists to remember that dysfunction of the kidney may be part of the primary systemic disorder or consequence of its pharmacotherapy. In the first part of this review we will analyse the kidney involvement in four autoimmune connective tissue diseases: systemic lupus erythematosus, Sjögren syndrome, polymyositis/dermatomyositis, and systemic sclerosis. Renal disease is common in lupus and is a main cause of morbidity and mortality. About 10% of patients with Sjögren syndrome may present interstitial nephritis or, more rarely, glomerulonephritis. Myoglobinuria and acute kidney injury is a frequent complication of polymyositis. Renal disease is one of the most serious complications of systemic sclerosis and may present with a dramatic renal crisis, characterized by malignant hypertension, oligo-anuria, and microangiopathic thrombocytopenic anaemia.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Many rheumatologic diseases may have important renal manifestations that may present with microscopic haematuria, proteinuria, hypertension, acute kidney injury (AKI), or chronic kidney disease (CKD). In a number of cases the kidney involvement may be extremely severe and life-threatening. The pathogenesis is extremely variable and may depend on the rheumatic disease or on the drugs used in these instances. In the last few years, the clinical presentation, the prognosis and the treatment of renal disorders in rheumatologic diseases is changed and the physiopathology of kidney involvement and original disease have been better elucidated.
In this review we report an updated review of renal involvement in systemic autoimmune connective diseases including systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), Sjögren syndrome, polymyositis and dermatomyositis (PM,DM), and systemic sclerosis (SS).
Lupus nephritis (LN)
Kidney involvement is common in patients with SLE and is usually called lupus nephritis. LN is initiated by the glomerular deposition of immune complexes including circulating anti-nuclear, anti-C1q, and cross-reactive anti-glomerular autoantibodies. Recent studies employing laser microdissection of glomeruli and/or of single cells from tubulointerstitial areas followed by elution and characterization of renal antibodies by proteomics allowed a significant progress in definition of renal autoimmune components in human lupus biopsies and sera. The innovative approach highlighted different panels of autoantibodies deposited in glomeruli and in tubulo-interstitial areas [1]. IgG2 was the major isotype; new podocyte proteins (α-enolase, annexin AI) and already known implanted molecules (DNA, histone 3, C1q) were their target antigens in glomeruli [2]. Vimentin, is an intermediate filament protein expressed in mesangial matrix. Epitopes of native vimentin are antigenic and may be involved in several autoimmune disease. Anti-vimentin antibodies are often associated with therapy-resistant LN [3]. Matching renal autoantibodies with serum allowed the definition of a typical autoantibody serum map of LN that included the same anti-α-enolase, anti-annexin AI, anti-DNA, and anti-histone 3 IgG2 already detected in renal tissue. Anti-histone 3 and anti-α-enolase IgG2 levels had the most remarkable increase in LN serum and represented a discriminating feature of LN versus SLE without renal involvement and rheumatoid arthritis. Serum levels of these specific autoantibodies were tenfold increased in patients with lupus nephritis allowing a clear differentiation from both rheumatoid arthritis and other glomerulonephritis [4].
These immune complexes can access the whole glomerulus and can deposit in subendothelium or subepithelium. Immune deposits may trigger the complement cascade, or may activate intrinsic glomerular cells inducing the release of inflammatory chemokines and cytokines [5]. Subendothelial lesions cause endothelial injury and through a direct contact between endothelial and mesangial cells [6] can cause proliferative lesions that can be amplified by several mechanisms, including toll-like receptors 7 and 9 activation, dendritic cells maturation and endothelin-1 secretion. Instead, subepithelial deposits cause podocyte and glomerular basement membrane injury but both mesangial cells and podocytes have limited regenerative capacity and their loss is associated with glomerulosclerosis. On the other hand, tubulointerstitial inflammatory cells include mature myeloid and plasmacytoid dendritic cells. These may recognize cell debris as danger associated molecular pattern and may present them as autoantigens to the quiescent cells of the adaptive immunity. Activated T cells proliferate and differentiate in Th1 and Th17. The cooperation between T cells and B cells can promote B cells to differentiate into plasmacells with production of autoantibodies to renal antigens [7]. Plasmacytoid dendritic cells can also stimulate the production of interferon-α which has a critical role in inflammation and contributes to many of the immune system alterations that characterize SLE to the tissue manifestations of disease [8].
An emerging aspect in the development of LN is the role of protective autoantibodies including the recently identified anti-PTX3 antibodies [9]. PTX3 is an acute phase protein involved in opsonization of invading pathogens and/or apoptotic cells with an overall anti-inflammatory activity under physiological conditions. However, in case of extensive tissue damage, e.g., ischaemia–reperfusion injury, or in presence of an exaggerated burden of exposed antigens, PTX3 may be shifted towards a pro-inflammatory phenotype resulting in an uncontrolled complement activation and inflammation [10]. Accordingly, PTX3 deposition was observed in kidneys of patients with LN where it correlated with the extent of fibrosis and proteinuria [11], while anti-PTX3 antibodies were inversely associated with LN occurrence in both patients and lupus models. Indeed, immunization with PTX3 dampens production of nephritogenic antibodies and ameliorates disease in lupus nephritis models. Notably, it has been shown that PTX3 is preferentially deposited in glomerular electron dense deposits [12].
The clinical manifestations of LN varied from asymptomatic urinary abnormalities to nephrotic syndrome, nephritic syndrome and rapidly progressive renal insufficiency. The histological lesions are extremely variable too. According to the revisited classification of LN [13], LN histology is classified as minimal or mesangial proliferative LN (class I or II), focal or diffuse proliferative LN (class III and IV), membranous LN (class V) and advanced sclerosis LN (class VI). In a number of cases a combination of class III or IV with class V can occur. Other histological pictures triggered by SLE or its treatment may include lupus podocytopathy, thrombotic microangiopathy, acute tubulo-interstitial nephritis. The positivity for antipospholipid antibodies (aPL Abs) may aggravate the outcome of LN. It is often associated with thrombotic microangiopathy or vascular complications. In this setting, aβ2GPI-D1 antibody detection might provide a second-line assay to be performed in aβ2GPI positive patients with LN, allowing more accurate stratification of the renal vascular involvement risk [14]. Anti-aPL Abs may also play a role in the damage caused by proliferative LN. In a study LN patients positive for aPL Abs had lower serum complement C3 and C4 levels and higher intensity of C1q deposition in kidney tissue than aPL antibody negative proliferative LN patients [15].
The prognosis of Class I and II is good unless there is a transformation into more severe class; class III and IV had a course punctuated by renal or extra-renal flares alternating with periods of quiescence. When untreated or undertreated, particularly when associated with class V, most patients with proliferative LN progress to ESRD or die within few years from clinical onset. The natural course of Class V may be slowly progressive with about 50% of patients developing end stage renal disease (ESRD) if not treated appropriately. Although class I and II in the great majority of cases present with only asymptomatic proteinuria and microhaematuria and proliferative forms (Class III and IV) tend to present with the most severe clinical presentation (nephritic syndrome or rapidly progressive renal disease), renal biopsy is very useful in patient with signs of renal involvement [16] since in most cases, clinical, serological or laboratory tests cannot accurately predict renal biopsy findings [17]. Although any decision should always be taken by considering the clinical conditions of the patient, there are no doubts that repeat renal biopsy may represent an useful tool to evaluate the response to therapy, to modulate the intensity of treatment, and to predict the long-term renal outcome both in quiescent lupus and in flares of activity (Fig. 1). The value of renal biopsy in patients without clinical renal manifestations is debated. Except for few reported cases of class III and IV diagnosed without clinical renal manifestations who had a worse outcome, in all the other biopsies of patients with the so-called silent LN, class I and II are diagnosed.
In the last few years, several changes occurred in the clinical presentation of LN. More cases with mild clinical involvement are diagnosed in comparison to the past. This is probably due to a more diffuse use of LN markers, such as proteinuria, urine sediment, serum creatinine [18,19,20]. By reviewing our own experience, in 71 patients with LN diagnosed 1969 and 1989, the clinical presentation was characterized by urinary abnormalities in 28% of cases, by nephrotic syndrome in 30%, nephritic syndrome in 27% and rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis in 15%. Instead, in 131 patients with LN diagnosed between 2000 and 2015, the number of cases presenting with urinary abnormalities increased to 54% of cases, nephrotic syndrome reduced to 23%, nephritic syndrome to 18% and rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis to 5% [21]. Despite changes in clinical presentation, the distribution of the histological classes did not change between the two periods, the proportion of patients with class III and IV was similar [22].
Compared to the past a number of complications or new treatments may cause renal disease in SLE patients. A substantial and increasing proportion of kidney pathology might not directly relate to LN but instead might be explained by non-immune mediated factors such as diabetes, hypertension, and obesity [23]. The presence of anti-phospholipid antibodies can cause thrombosis at any level of kidney vasculature [24]. Drugs currently in use such as quinolones, antiviral agents, proton pump inhibitors (PPI), and especially non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents( NSAIDs) can cause kidney injury nowadays [25,26,27], while in the past the most frequent nephrotoxic drugs were captopril, aminoglycosides, radiocontrast agents or amphotericin B which are now used with more caution.
The prognosis of LN is progressively improved over the time [21, 28]. This was recently confirmed in a large multicentre study [29]. The analysis of the outcome of 499 LN patients diagnosed from 1970 to 2016 demonstrated a progressive and significant increase in patient age at LN diagnosis, and a longer time between SLE onset and LN development. The frequency of renal insufficiency at the time of LN presenation progressively decreased and that of urinary abnormalities increased. No changes in histological class and activity index were observed, while chronicity index significantly decreased from 1970 to 2016. The 10-year survival without end-stage renal disease (ESRD) improved from 87% between 1970 and 1985 to 94% between 1986 and 2001 and to 99% between 2002 and 2016. At multivariate analysis, male gender, arterial hypertension, absence of maintenance immunosuppressive therapy, increased serum creatinine, and high activity and chronicity index were independent predictors of ESRD.
Treatment of LN is also changed in the last years (Table 1). The complications of immunosuppressive therapy- including infections, osteoporosis, cardiovascular disease and reproductive effects -impaired the life expectancy and the quality of life of many patients with LN. In the induction therapy, the high- dose intravenous (iv) pulses of cyclophosphamide have been replaced by low-dose pulses [30] or by oral administration [31]. A meta-analysis showed that in comparison with iv cyclophosphamide, tacrolimus could significantly increase complete remission, serum albumin level and decrease urine protein [32]. Rituximab has been frequently used to reduce the use of corticosteroids both in induction therapy and in frequently flaring or persistent active LN [33]. Although the randomized phase III trial in patients with class III and IV LN, failed to demonstrate the superiority of Rituximab over standard therapy in improving the clinical outcome at 1 year [34], targeting B cell and reducing autoantibody production represents a promising therapeutic approach in LN, particularly in difficult cases [35].
In the maintenance phase, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) allowed to avoid the long-term use of cyclophosphamide and proved to be superior than azathioprine in maintaining renal response [36]. Low-dose cyclosporine proved to be safe and effective in reducing proteinuria [37, 38], but there is no data about the long-term effects of cyclosporine [39]. Voclosporin is a novel calcineurin inhibitor, a trans isomer of cyclosporine,which possesses most of the beneficial effect of the drug. In a recent randomized trial in lupus the addition of low-dose voclosporin to mycophenolate mofetil and corticosteroids for induction therapy of active LN resulted in a superior renal response compared to mycophenolate mofetil and corticosteroids alone, but higher rates of adverse events including death were observed [40]. Although not seen on trials, in real life the addition of belimumab to the conventional therapy in lupus nephritis obtained steroid-sparing effects [41]. In a randomized controlled trial of maintenance treatment, a multitarget therapy based on tacrolimus, MMF and low-dose prednisone in lupus nephritis resulted in lower renal relapse rate and fewer adverse events in comparison with azathioprine and low-dose prednisone [42]. Ancillary treatment with hydroxychloroquine [43] may reduce the doses of glucocorticoids and the risk of lupus flares. It has also been reported the possibility of progressive tapering of immunosuppressive therapy until its complete withdrawal in patients with clinically stable LN. This allowed to significantly improve renal survival and treatment-related side effect in the long term [44]. Others suggested a more careful approach based on the absence of renal activity at kidney biopsy, in order to reduce the risk of flares [45]. In summary, earlier diagnosis and treatment, refinement in monitoring and managing LN and availability of new drugs led to progressive improvement of LN over the time.
Sjögren syndrome
Sjögren syndrome is an autoimmune disease characterized by inflammation and destruction of exocrine glands, principally lachrymal, parotid, and salivary glands as well as by involvement of multiple organ systems. The syndrome may be classified as primary Sjögren when it is isolated or secondary when associated with other autoimmune rheumatic disease, especially rheumatoid arthritis, delineating a condition named overlap connective tissue disease. In Sjögren syndrome infiltration of lymphocytes and plasma cells can be observed in glands and in other organs, including kidney. Indeed, renal involvement has been reported in less than 10% of patients and is characterized by interstitial nephritis or, more rarely, glomerulonephritis [46].
Interstitial nephritis is the prevalent kidney disease. In a large multicentre French study; 98% of 95 patients showed tubulointerstitial nephritis at renal biopsy [47]. The interstitial nephritis may remain asymptomatic for a long period and may eventually present with fatigue, muscular weakness, or polyuria [48]. Skeletal manifestation is also a common finding in patients with Sjögren syndrome [49]. Initial biochemical analysis shows hypokalaemia, hyperchloremia and reduced kidney function. Further investigations demonstrate the presence of an underlying tubular acidosis. Type I distal tubular acidosis is the most frequent disorder. It is characterized by a reduced hydrogen ions secretion by the alpha intercalated cells in the distal convoluted tubules leading to hyperchloremic acidosis and hypokalaemia. Metabolic acidosis may also affect bone by exchanging hydrogen ions for sodium, potassium, calcium, carbonate and phosphate [50]. The continuous sequestration of protons in bone stimulates both osteoclast differentiation and osteoclast activity. Eventually, this mechanism leads to net bone loss and hypercalciuria, that coupled with alkaline urine may lead to stunted growth and bone abnormalities in children or in nephrocalcinosis and nephrolithiasis in adults [51].
Type II tubular acidosis is less frequent. It involves proximal tubules and is caused by poor reabsorption of bicarbonate [52]. Tubular acidosis may occur without involvement of other solutes [53] or may be associated with urinary loss of phosphate, uric acid, glucose, amino acids and low-molecular-weight proteins as part of the Fanconi syndrome [54, 55]. Renal biopsy shows tubulointerstitial nephritis with infiltrate of lymphocytes, macrophages and plasma cells around the tubules with complete sparing of the glomeruli [56, 57]. In advanced cases severe pathological changes with extensive interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy are present.
Glomerulonephritis is a rare kidney complication in Sjögren syndrome. It may present with proteinuria associated with microscopic haematuria or, rarely, with a nephrotic syndrome. Deterioration of kidney function is frequent [58, 59]. Membranous nephropathy [60] and IgA nephritis [61] are frequent forms of glomerulonephritis in Sjögren syndrome; however, endocapillary and extracapillary proliferative glomerulonephritis [62, 63] have also been described. In a number of cases membranoproliferative glomerular lesions are related to an associated disease such as vasculitis, SLE, mixed cryoglobulinaemia or occult hepatitis C infection [64,65,66].
The long‐term renal prognosis varies in patients with primary Sjögren syndrome who have clinically significant kidney involvement. Patients with interstitial nephritis display a favourable prognosis, although occasional cases of renal failure may occur as a consequence of diffuse tubule-interstitial lesions or nephrocalcinosis. Appropriate screening must be performed at least once a year in patients with Sjögren syndrome in order to facilitate the early detection of renal complications. More severe is the prognosis of patients with glomerulonephritis, which may progress to ESRD [67, 68].
Treatment depends on the nature of the underlying kidney disease. In case of chronic interstitial nephritis, some studies reported that treatment with glucocorticoids alone or associated with mycophenolate improved the renal function in few patients [69], others found only marginal or no benefit of glucocorticoids and other immunosuppressive agents [70]. If hypokalaemic distal tubular acidosis is present, alkali administration equivalent to the sum of endogenous acid production and bicarbonate wastage is needed. In general, the total replacement is 1–2 mEq/kg per day of sodium bicarbonate or citrate, which is its metabolic equivalent. Greater amount may be needed in children who have larger wastage of bicarbonate than adults. Correction of acidosis may improve hypokalaemia and hypercalciuria and can increase the citrate excretion, with decreased incidence of nephrocalcinosis and nephrolithiasis. In children with proximal tubular acidosis, sodium bicarbonate 5–15 mEq/kg per day is enough to compensate for the urinary bicarbonate loss and the endogenous acid production (Table 2). The management of glomerular diseases secondary to SLE, vasculitis, or cryoglobulinemia is that of the associated systemic disease.
The recent EULAR guidelines recommended that the use of glucocorticoids, synthetic immunosuppressive agents (cyclophosphamide, azathioprine, methotrexate, leflunomide, mycophenolate), intravenous immunoglobulins and biologics should be restricted to patients with active systemic disease but only after a careful evaluation of both severity and organ damage. Recommendations on the need for/duration of induction and maintenance therapies should be decided on case-by-case [71].
Polymyositis and dermatomyositis
The idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) are a group of rare and heterogeneous acquired diseases affecting striated skeletal muscles, which include polymyositis (PM), dermatomyositis (DM), necrotizing autoimmune myopathy (NAM), and inclusion body myopathy (IBM). They are all characterized by elevation of muscle enzymes levels in serum and distinctive findings on electromyography and muscle biopsy. The pathogenesis is still unknown, but immune-mediated and non-immune mediated mechanisms can contribute to tissue damage. In the last few years, a number of myositis- specific and myositis-associated antibodies have been found. It has been hypothesized that endogenous antigens, i.e., aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase enzyme, may trigger activation of signalling pathways inducing the expression of multiple genes involved in the inflammatory response [72].
Predominant symptoms are proximal muscle weakness and typical skin finding in DM (heliotrope rash and Gottron’s papules). The disease may also afflict oesophagus, lung, and rarely myocardium. Pulmonary manifestations are major life-threatening events in IIMs and are frequent in patients with positive anti-synthetase antibodies. Overlap with systemic sclerosis is frequent accounting for approximately 40% of all cases of myositis overlap. IIMs have a high morbidity, and not infrequently are the first sign of an associated malignancy [73]. The first line therapy consist of glucocorticoids that proved to be effective in many patients. Immunosuppressants, IVIg and plasma-exchange are used as rescue therapy in patients with refractory manifestations, but no randomized controlled trials are available to guide efficacy and safety.
Data regarding the kidney involvement in patients with IIMs are scarce. Two large retrospective series of patients with IIMs reported a prevalence of renal disease between 21 and 23% [74, 75]. The most frequent type of kidney lesions in IIMs is acute renal failure that may be caused by rhabdomyolysis, drug toxicity or infection. Less frequent is an association with chronic glomerulonephritis.
Myoglobinuria may occur in as many as 20% of patients with IIMs [76]. When great amounts of myoglobin are released, an acute kidney injury may occur. It can be caused by casts formation and obstruction of the tubular lumen, and by the toxic effects of myoglobinuria on kidney tubules, including iron-induced oxidative stress and the development of a third space into the injured muscles [77,78,79,80,81]. The latter event causes vasoconstriction that in turn activates renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system, sympathetic nervous system and vasopressin release. All of them converge in causing profound vasoconstriction, ischaemia and oliguria [82]. The output of reddish to brown urine is the main clinical manifestations of rhabdomyolysis-induced acute renal failure. The microscopic examination of urinary sediment is necessary for the differential diagnosis with macroscopic haematuria, in which red blood cells are found, while only pigmented granular cells can be observed in rhabdomyolysis. However, in the cohort of Couvrat-Desvergnes et al. [75] only few cases of rhabdomyolysis were observed, the main cause of acute kidney injury was drug toxicity (40% of all the cases), mainly due to IV immunoglobulins, but also related to the use of tacrolimus or cisplatin for associated cancer. Other clinical situations such as intercurrent sepsis and dehydration can contribute to kidney injury [83].
A wide range of immune-complex glomerulonephritis has been reported in patients with IIMs submitted to renal biopsy. The results of around 50 renal biopsies performed in IIMs have been reported in the literature [revised in 76, 78, 84]. IgA nephropathy was the most frequent glomerular disease, followed by membranous nephropathy, minimal change disease and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Few cases of membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis, pauci-immune crescentic glomerulonephritis and tubulointerstitial nephritis have been reported. A peculiar pattern of severe acute renal vascular damage consisting mainly of oedematous thickening of the intima of arterioles has been described in five patients [75]. The occurrence of such a variegate phenotypes of glomerular diseases may be related to a dysregulated generation of different autoantibodies in inflammatory myopathies. The mechanisms underlying this dysregulated generation of autoantibodies remain unclear. The clinical presentation of IIMs-associated glomerulonephritis varies from mild urinary abnormalities to nephrotic syndrome or rapidly progressive renal insufficiency. Probably, glomerular diseases in IIMs are underestimated because not all cases of mild proteinuria or microscopic haematuria are submitted to renal biopsy. In some cases, the development of glomerular disease is concomitant to the myopathy diagnosis.
The renal prognosis depends on the type of kidney injury and comorbidity. The outcome of acute kidney injury was poor in a series: of 16 patients 13 (81%) progressed to CKD and 2 (12.5%) reached ESRD. Age at IIMs onset, male gender, a history of cardiovascular events, and a previous episode of kidney injury were associated with the risk of CKD. The prognosis of glomerular diseases depends on the histological and clinical features at presentation. It is usually good for patients with normal renal function and mild proteinuria. It may be severe for patients with deteriorated kidney function, nephrotic syndrome and a picture of extracapillary glomerulonephritis at renal biopsy.
The choice of treatment is based on the type of kidney disease (Table 3). In case of rhabdomyolysis-associated acute renal failure, treatment consists of aggressive alkalinisation and hydration and rapid reduction of hyperkalaemia to prevent cardiac arrhythmias [77]. Patients with mild proteinuria and normal renal function may benefit from ACE-inhibitors or angiotensin-receptor blockers. The steroids schedule in use for IIMs includes prednisone 1 mg/kg/day for 4–6 weeks [72], which can be effective for kidney and muscles. In cases of nephrotic syndrome, the addition of another immunosuppressive drug-cyclophosphamide, azathioprine, cyclosporine, tacrolimus, mycophenolate or rituximab- may be considered. However, no randomized controlled trial could confirm the validity of these treatments. Regular renal follow-up of these patients is recommended.
Systemic sclerosis
Systemic sclerosis (SS), also called scleroderma, is an immune-mediated rheumatic disease of unknown aetiology that is characterized by fibrosis of the skin, blood vessels and visceral organs including the gastrointestinal tract, lungs, heart, and kidneys. It primarily affects women and there are two clinical subsets according to the extent of skin involvement: diffuse cutaneous SS and limited cutaneous SS. The pathogenesis of SS is extremely complex, but there is now evidence that immunogenetics, immune dysfunction, inflammatory mediators, fibroblasts, extracellular matrix and the endothelial damage can interact and affect each other eventually leading to the pathological and clinical manifestations of SS [84]. Several studies reported that both non-HLA genes, KIAA0319L, PXK, and JAZF1 [85] and HLA genes, especially B35 [86, 87], are associated with SS susceptibility. Of note, B35 influences the production of endothelin-1, a potent vasoconstrictor and profibrotic factor, while decreases nitric oxide synthase which catalyses the production of the vasodilator nitric oxide. In this permissive genetic background, abnormalities of the innate and adaptive immune systems lead to production of autoantibodies and cell-mediated autoimmunity that coupled with increased expression of endothelin-1 [88] and reduced production of nitric oxide synthase [89] cause hypoxia, vasoconstriction, intimal proliferation and endothelial injury. In the meantime, endothelin-1 activates and re-programs the functional phenotypes of vascular smooth muscle cells, microvascular pericytes and tissue fibroblasts into pro-fibrogenic cell populations with myofibroblasts-like properties [90]. Platelets are also activated in SS and can release chemokines, cytokines and growth factors, including TGF-β1 that increases the production of collagen and extracellular matrix [91]. Thus, the disease targets the vasculature, connective tissue-producing fibroblasts/myofibroblasts components, microvascular endothelial cell/small vessel fibroproliferative vasculopathy, and fibroblast dysfunction eventually generating excessive accumulation of collagen and other matrix components in skin and internal organs.
Renal disease is one of the most serious complications of SS. It is more often observed in the context of extensive diffuse skin disease. Some individuals are initially asymptomatic or show only mild proteinuria, microscopic haematuria and occasional casts. These patients may follow an indolent course until hypertension and progressive deterioration of kidney function develop. Histologically, renal vessels show intimal proliferation, medial thinning and increased collagen deposition in the adventitial layer. Both post- and antemortem studies suggest that endothelial lesions occur before the clinical diagnosis of renal disease and precede the histological evidence of fibrosis [92].
In almost 10% of diffuse cutaneous SS patients and in rare cases of limited cutaneous SS a scleroderma renal crisis (SRC) may develop, sometimes preceding the clinical diagnosis of SS [93]. The clinical presentation is dramatic, SRC being one of the few emergencies in clinical rheumatology. It is characterized by a malignant hypertension, oliguric acute renal failure, pulmonary oedema, microangiopathic haemolytic anaemia in about 40% of cases, and central nervous system involvement with encephalopathy and seizures. In around 15% of cases, SRC may present with normal blood pressure and is termed normotensive SRC. In these cases, the clinical picture is very severe with haemolytic anaemia in 90% of patients, thrombocytopenia in 83%, and frequent lung haemorrhage. Almost 2/3 of patients received glucocorticoids before the development of normotensive SRC [94]. This clinical presentation is similar to that of thrombotic microangiopathy and the differential diagnosis may be difficult. Typical SRC exhibits prominently elevated blood pressure and worsening of renal function initially, followed by mild thrombocytopenia. Conversely, normotensive SRC and thrombotic microangiopathy presents first with severe thrombocytopenia, followed by elevated blood pressure and renal function deterioration [95]. Microscopically arterial lesions predominate. Small interlobular and arcuate arteries as well as small arteries and arterioles are affected (Fig. 2). The early changes consist in marked proliferation of intimal cells and accumulation of mucoid ground substance composed by glycoproteins and mucopolysaccharides. This proliferation may damage the internal elastic lamina allowing muscle-like cells to migrate into the intima. There is also a fibrous thickening of adventitia. Gross narrowing of the blood levels leads to ischaemia which may be aggravated by vascular thrombosis with consequent atrophy of the nourished tissues. Fibrinoid changes in the walls or arterioles and microinfarct are also frequent.[96, 97]. Glomeruli may be normal but may be necrotic or ischaemic in the area with infarct. In cases of thrombotic microangiopathy, there are mesangiolysis, thickening of capillary walls, intracapillary thrombosis and areas of fibrinoid necrosis. Juxtaglomerular apparatus is hypertrophic. Tubular atrophy and interstitial fibrosis are frequent [98]. The aetiopathogenesis of SRC is presumed to be a series of insults to the kidneys resulting in the narrowing of renal arterioles. An important role is played by the renin-angiotensin system which is overactivated as shown by the markedly increased levels of plasma renin [99] leading to decreased blood flow, hyperplasia of the juxtaglomerular apparatus, hyperreninemia, and accelerated hypertension. Risk factors include rapid skin thickening, use of certain medications such glucocorticoids or cyclosporine, new-onset microangiopathic haemolytic anaemia and/or thrombocytopenia, cardiac complications (pericardial effusion, congestive heart failure, and/or arrhythmias), large joint contractures, and presence of anti-RNA polymerase III antibody [100].The clinical impression is that the prevalence of SRC seems reduced over the time: however, a meta-analysis of studies reported from 1983 to 2011 found no statistical reduction in the temporal prevalence of SRC patients with diffuse cutaneous SS (7–9%), or patients with limited cutaneous SS (0.5–0.6%) based on either the start date of the cohort or publication date [101].
The prognosis of renal SS largely depends on the rapid control of malignant hypertension and improvement of the ongoing renal ischaemia. The advent of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) allowed to reverse the dreadful outcome of SRC (Table 4). In a pivotal prospective study carried out in a cohort of 108 SRC patients, the 1-year survival rate was 76% in those treated with ACEI and 15% in those who were ACEI free [102]. Despite the improvement, SRC remains a life-threatening manifestation characterized by a high rate of mortality and progression into permanent dialysis [103,104,105]. In a retrospective study, the clinical charts of 606 patients, affected with SS were reviewed. Twenty (3.3%) patients developed SRC. One year after SRC onset, 55% of patients developed ESRD. The survival rate was 70% at 1 year and 50% at 5 years, the mortality rate related to SRC was 35% [106]. In summary, short-term prognosis of SRC has improved, but long-term prognosis remains disappointing particularly in patients in renal replacement therapy [107]. Mortality is reduced but a substantial number of patients with SRC still die of cardiac or lung complications. Some patients may progress to ESRD and need dialysis. Scleroderma recurrence after renal transplantation is possible [108] but the risk is low [109].
Immunosuppression may improve many aspects of SS, but it is not curative [109]. Treatment of SRC is mainly based on anti-hypertensive drugs. Early treatment is mandatory to prevent irreversible organ damage. However, blood pressure should not be reduced below the limit of cerebral autoregulation to prevent the risk of iatrogenic ischemia. It is also recommended not to lower blood pressure too fast in order to prevent relative or actual hypovolemia associated with vasodilatation of constricted vessels which can further decrease kidney perfusion. Thus intravenous antihypertensives such as nitroprusside and labetalol or powerful drugs such as minoxidil should be avoided. For the majority of hypertensive emergencies, mean arterial pressure should be reduced by approximately 10–20% within the first hour and by another 5–15% over the next 24 h. This often results in a target blood pressure of less than 180/120 mm Hg for the first hour and less than 160/110 mm Hg for the next 24 h, but rarely less than 130/80 mm Hg during that time frame [110,111,112]. The decision of which drug to use depends on numerous factors including the clinical indications, pharmacokinetics, toxicity and drug interactions. Furthermore, more than one of the recommended drugs is often required for the successful lowering of the patient’s blood pressure. ACE-inhibitors remain the mainstay in the therapy of SRC due to the critical role of renin-angiotensin system in the pathogenesis of SRC [113]. Dihydropyridine calcium-channel blockers, such as nifedipine, can also reverse SRC and even prevent its development [114]. In refractory cases a combination of ACE inhibitors with endothelin receptor blockers [115] and agents targeting the complement component five has been proposed [88]. Plasma-exchange seems to give some benefits in patients with SRC and microangiopathy or in subjects intolerant to ACE-inhibitors [106, 116, 117]. SRC may lead to complement system activation through the classical pathway. Early administration of Eculizumab, a monoclonal antibody blocking C5, has been used with success in patients with SRC complicated by thombotic microngiopathy [118,119,120].
References
Bonanni A, Vaglio A, Bruschi M, Sinico RA, Cavagna L, Moroni G et al (2015) Multi-antibody composition in lupus nephritis: isotype and antigen specificity make the difference. Autoimmun rev 14(8):692–702
Bruschi M, Sinico RA, Moroni G, Pratesi F, Migliorini P, Galetti M et al (2014) Glomerular autoimmune multicomponents of human lupus nephritis in vivo: α-enolase and annexin AI. J Am Soc Nephrol 25(11):2483–2498
Kinloch AJ, Chang A, Ko K, Dunand CJH, Henderson S, Maienschein-Cline M et al (2014) Vimentin is a dominant target of in situ humoral immunity in human lupus tubulointerstitial nephritis arthritis. Rheumatol 66(12):3359–3370
Bruschi M, Galetti M, Sinico RA, Moroni G, Bonanni A, Radice A et al (2015) Glomerular autoimmune multicomponents of human lupus nephritis in vivo (2): planted antigens. J Am Soc Nephrol 26(8):1905–1924
Davidson A (2016) (2016) What is damaging the kidney in lupus nephritis? Nat Rev Rheumatol 12:143–153
Fu J, Lee K, Chuang PY, Liu Z, He JC (2015) Glomerular endothelial cell injury and cross talk in diabetic kidney disease. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 308(4):F287–F297
Maria NI, Davidson A (2020) Protecting the kidney in systemic lupus erythematosus:from diagnosis to therapy. Nat Rev Rheumatol 12:67. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41584-020-0401-9
Crow MK (2014) Type I interferon in the pathogenesis of lupus. J Immunol 192:5459–5468
Bassi NA, Ghirardello A, Blank M, Zampieri S, Sarzi-Puttini P, Mantovani A et al (2010) IgG anti-pentraxin 3 antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann Rheum Dis 69:1704–1710
de Oliveira T, Souza DG, Teixeira MM, Amaral FA (2019) Tissue dependent role of PTX3 during ischemia-reperfusion injury. Front Immunol 10:1461
Bassi N, Del Prete D, Ghirardello A, Gatto M, Ceol M, Zen M et al (2015) PTX3, anti-PTX3, and anti-C1q autoantibodies in lupus glomerulonephritis. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol 49:217–226
Gatto M, Radu C, Luisetto R, Ghirardello A, Bonsembiante F, Trez D et al (2020) Immunization with pentraxin3 prevents transition from subclinical to clinical lupus nephritis in lupus-prone mice: insights from renal ultrastructural findings. J Autoimmun. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaut.2020.102443
Weening JJ, D’Agati VD, Schwartz MM, Seshan SV, Alpers CE, Appel GB et al (2004) The classification of glomerulonephritis in systemic lupus erythematosus revisited. J Am Soc Nephrol 15(2):241–250
Sciascia S, Radin M, Cecchi I, Fenoglio R, De Marchi A, Besso L, Baldovino S et al (2020) Anti-beta-2-glycoprotein I domain 1 identifies antiphospholipid antibodies-related injuries in patients with concomitant lupus nephritis. J Nephrol 1:8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40620-019-00698-9
Ding X, Chen C, Zhang J, Lu G (2020) Antiphospholipid antibodies in patients with proliferative and membranous lupus nephritis. Clin Rheumatol 39(5):1531–1535
Fanouriakis A, Kostopoulou M, Cheema K, Anders HJ, Aringer M, Bajema I et al (2020) 2019 Update of the Joint European League Against Rheumatism and European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association (EULAR/ERA-EDTA) recommendations for the management of lupus nephritis. Ann Rheum Dis 79:713–723
Wakasugi D, Gono T, Kawaguchi Y, Hara M, Koseki Y, Katsumata Y et al (2012) Frequency of class III and IV nephritis in systemic lupus erythematosus without clinical renal involvement: an analysis of predictive measures. J Rheumatol 39(1):79–85
Christopher-Stine L, Siedner M, Lin J, Haas M, Parekh H, Petri M, Fine DM (2007) Renal biopsy in lupus patients with low levels of proteinuria. J Rheumatol 34(2):332–335
Almaani S, Meara A, Rovin BH (2017) Update on lupus nephritis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 12(5):825–835
Moroni G, Depetri F, Ponticelli C (2016) Lupus nephritis: when and how often to biopsy and what does it mean? J Autoimmun 74:27–40
Moroni G, Quaglini S, Gallelli B, Banfi G, Messa P, Ponticelli C (2013) Progressive improvement of patient and renal survival and reduction of morbidity over time in patients with lupus nephritis (LN) followed for 20 years. Lupus 22(8):80–88
Parodis I, Tamirou F, Houssiau FA (2020) Prediction of prognosis and renal outcome in lupus nephritis. Lupus Sci Med 18(1):389. https://doi.org/10.1136/lupus-2020-000389
Falasinnu T, O’Shaughnessy M, Troxell ML, Charu V, Weisman H, Simard JF (2019) A review of non-immune mediated kidney disease in sytemic lupus erythematosus: a hypothetical model of putative risk factors. Semin Arthritis Rheum 49(19):30702–30704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2019.10.006
Sciascia S, Cuadrado MJ, Khamashta M, Roccatello D (2014) Renal involvement in antiphospholipid syndrome. Nat Rev Nephrol 10(5):279–289
Hajji M, Jebali H, Mrad A, Blel Y, Brahmi N, Kheder R et al (2018) Nephrotoxicity of ciprofloxacin: five cases and a review of the literature. Drug Saf Case Rep 18(1):17
Milburn J, Jones R, Levy JB (2017) Renal effects of novel antiretroviral drugs. Nephrol Dial Transplant 32(3):434–439
Bakhriansyah M, Souverein PC, van den Hoogen MWF, de Boer A, Klungel OH (2019) Risk of nephrotic syndrome for non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug users. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 14(9):1355–1362
Jorge A, Wallace ZS, Zhang Y, Lu N, Costenbader KH, Choi HK (2019) (2019) All-cause and cause-specific mortality trends of end-stage renal disease due to lupus nephritis from 1995 to 2014. Arthritis Rheumatol 71(3):403–410
Moroni G, Vercelloni PG, Quaglini S, Gatto M, Gianfreda D, Sacchi L et al (2018) Changing patterns in clinical-histological presentation and renal outcome over the last five decades in a cohort of 499 patients with lupus nephritis. Ann Rheum Dis 77(9):1318–1325
Houssiau FA, Vasconcelos C, D’Cruz D, Sebastiani GD, Garrido R, Danieli MG et al (2002) Immunosuppressive therapy in lupus nephritis: the Euro-Lupus Nephritis Trial, a randomized trial of low-dose versus high-dose intravenous cyclophosphamide. Arthritis Rheum 46(8):2121–2131
Ponticelli C, Glassock RJ, Moroni G (2010) Induction and maintenance therapy in proliferative lupus nephritis. J Nephrol 23(1):9–16
Deng J, Huo D, Wu Q, Yang Z, Liao Y (2012) A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing tacrolimus with intravenous cyclophosphamide in the induction treatment for lupus nephritis. Tohoku J Exp Med 227(4):281–288
Moroni G, Raffiotta F, Trezzi B, Giglio E, Mezzina N, Del N et al (2014) Rituximab vs. mycophenolate and vs. cyclophosphamide pulses for induction therapy of active lupus nephritis: a clinical observational study. Rheumatology (Oxford) 53(9):1570–1577
Rovin BH, Furie R, Latinis K, Looney RJ, Fervenza FC, Sanchez-Guerrero J et al (2012) Efficacy and safety of rituximab in patients with active proliferative lupus nephritis: the lupus nephritis assessment with rituximab study. Arthritis Rheum 64:1215–1226
Almaani S, Rovin BH (2019) B-cell therapy in lupus nephritis: an overview. Nephrol Dial Transplant 34(1):22–29
Dooley MA, Jayne D, Ginzler EM, Isenberg D, Olsen NJ, Wofsy D et al (2011) ALMS group mycophenolate versus azathioprine as maintenance therapy for lupus nephritis. N Engl J Med 365(20):1886–1895
Moroni G, Doria A, Mosca M, Alberighi OD, Ferraccioli G, Todesco S et al (2006) A randomized pilot trial comparing cyclosporine and azathioprine for maintenance therapy in diffuse lupus nephritis over 4 years. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 1(5):925–932
Sheikholeslami M, Hajialilo M, Rasi Hashemi SS, Malek Mahdavi A, Gojazadeh M, Khabbazi A (2018) Low dose cyclosporine a in the treatment of resistant proliferative lupus nephritis. Mod Rheumatol 28(3):523–529
Ayoub I, Rovin BH (2017) Calcineurin inhibitors in the treatment of lupus nephritis: a hare versus turtle story? J Am Soc Nephrol 28(12):3435–3437
Rovin BH, Solomons N, Pendergraft WF, Dooley MA, Tumlin J, Romero-Diaz J, Lysenko L, Navarra SV, Huizinga RB (2019) A randomized, controlled double-blind study comparing the efficacy and safety of dose-ranging voclosporin with placebo in achieving remission in patients with active lupus nephritis. Kidney Int 95(1):219–231
Binda V, Trezzi B, Del Papa N, Beretta L, Frontini G, Porata G et al (2020 Jan 30) 2020) Belimumab may decrease flare rate and allow glucocorticoid withdrawal in lupus nephritis (including dialysis and transplanted patient. J Nephrol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40620-020-00706-3
Zhang H, Liu Z, Zhou M, Liu Z, Chen J, Xing C et al (2017) Multitarget therapy for maintenance treatment of lupus nephritis. J Am Soc Nephrol 28(12):3671–3678
Ponticelli C, Moroni G (2017) Hydroxychloroquine in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Expert Opin Drug Saf 16(3):411–419
Moroni G, Longhi S, Giglio E, Messa P, Ponticelli C (2013) What happens after complete withdrawal of therapy in patients with lupus nephritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 31(4 Suppl 78):S75–81
Malvar A, Alberton V, Lococo B, Ferrari M, Delgado P, Nagaraja HN, Rovin BH (2020) Kidney biopsy-based management of maintenance immunosuppression is safe and may ameliorate flare rate in lupus nephritis. Kidney Int 97(1):156–162
Francois H, Mariette X (2016) Renal involvement in primary Sjögren syndrome. Nat Rev Nephrol 12(2):82–93
Jasiek M, Karras A, Le Guern V, Krastinova E, Mesbah R, Faguer S et al (2017) A multicentre study of 95 biopsy-proven cases of renal disease in primary Sjögren’s syndrome. Rheumatology (Oxford) 56(3):362–370
Evans RD, Laing CM, Ciurtin C, Walsh SB (2016) Tubulointerstitial nephritis in primary Sjögren syndrome: clinical manifestations and response to treatment. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 5(17):2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-015-0858-x
Sandhya P, Danda D, Rajaratnam S, Thomas N (2014) Sjögren’s, renal tubular acidosis and osteomalacia–An Asian Indian Series. Open Rheumatol J 8:103–109
Krieger NS, Frick KK, Bushinsky DA (2004) Mechanism of acid-induced bone resorption. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 13(4):423–436
Vallés PG, Batlle D (2018) Hypokalemic Distal renal tubular acidosis. Hypokalemic distal renal tubular acidosis. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis 25(4):303–320
Haque SK, Ariceta G, Battle D (2012) Proximal renal tubular acidosis: a not so rare disorder of multiple etiologies. Nephrol Dial Transplant 27(12):4273–4287
Rodriguez Soriano J (2002) Renal tubular acidosis: the clinical entity. J Am Soc Nephrol 13:2160–2170
Yang YS, Peng CH, Sia SK, Huang CN (2007) Acquired hypophosphatemia osteomalacia associated with Fanconi’s syndrome in Sjögren’s syndrome. Rheumatol Int 27(6):593–597
Kobayashi T, Muto S, Nemoto J, Miyata Y, Ishiharajima S, Hironaka M et al (2006) Fanconi’s syndrome and distal (type 1) renal tubular acidosis in a patient with primary Sjögren’s syndrome with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. Clin Nephrol 65(6):427–432
Bredberg A, Henriksson G, Larsson A et al (2003) A role of the macrophage in Sjögen’s syndrome? Scand J Rheumatol 32:255
Maripuri S, Grande JP, Osborn TG, Fervenza FC, Matteson EL, Donadio JV, Hogan MC (2009) Renal involvement in primary Sjögren’s syndrome: a clinicopathologic study. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 4(9):1423–1431
Bossini N, Savoldi S, Franceschini F, Mombelloni S, Baronio M et al (2001) Clinical and morphological features of kidney involvement in primary Sjögren’s syndrome. Nephrol Dial Transplant 16(12):2328–2333
Kidder D, Rutherford E, Kipgen D et al (2015) Kidney biopsy findings in primary Sjögren syndrome. Nephrol Dial Transplant 30(8):1363–1369
Yang HX, Wang J, Wen YB, Fei YY, Jiang MD, Zhou MY (2018) Renal involvement in primary Sjögren’s syndrome: a retrospective study of 103 biopsy-proven cases from a single center in China. Int J Rheum Dis 21(1):223–229
François H, Mariette X (2016) (2016) Renal involvement in primary Sjögren syndrome. Nat Rev Nephrol 12(2):82–93
Dabadghao S, Aggarwal A, Arora P, Pandey R, Misra R (1995) Glomerulonephritis leading to end stage renal disease in a patient with primary Sjogren syndrome. Clin Exp Rheumatol 13:509–511
Cortez MS, Sturgill BC, Bolton WK (1995) Membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis with primary Sjogren’s syndrome. Am J Kidney Dis 25:632–636
Pasoto SG, de Adriano V, Bonfa E (2019) Sjögren’s syndrome and systemic lupus erythematosus: links and risks. Open Access Rheumatol 11:33–45
Imgenberg-Kreuz J, Almlöf JC, Leonard D, Sjöwall C, Syvänen AC, Rönnblom L et al (2019) Shared and unique patterns of dna methylation in systemic lupus erythematosus and primary Sjögren’s syndrome. Front Immunol 10:1686
Anand A, Krishna GG, Sibley RK, Kambham N (2015) Sjögren syndrome and cryoglobulinemic glomerulonephritis. Am J Kidney Dis 66(3):532–535
Goules AV, Tatouli IP, Moutsopoulos HM, Tzioufas AG (2013) Clinically significant renal involvement in primary Sjögren’s syndrome: clinical presentation and outcome. Arthr Rheum 65(11):2945–2953
Kidder D, Rutherford E, Kipgen D, Fleming S, Geddes C, Stewart GA (2015) Kidney biopsy findings in primary Sjögren syndrome. Nephrol Dial Transplant 30(8):1363–1369
Evans RDR, Laing CM, Ciurtin C, Walsh SB (2016) Tubulointerstitial nephritis in primary Sjögren syndrome: clinical manifestations and response to treatment. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 17:2
Jain A, Srinivas BH, Emmanuel D, Jain VK, Parameshwaran FS, Negi VS (2018) Renal involvement in primary Sjogren’s syndrome: a prospective cohort study. Rheumatol Int 38(12):2251–2262
Ramos-Casals M, Brito-Zerón P, Bombardieri S, Bootsma H, Dörner T et al (2020) EULAR-Sjögren syndrome task force group. EULAR recommendations for the management of Sjögren’s syndrome with topical and systemic therapies. Ann Rheum Dis 79(1):3–18
Dalakas MC (2015) Inflammatory muscle diseases. N Engl J Med 373:393–394
Christopher-Stine L, Plotz PH (2004) Myositis: an update on pathogenesis. Curr Opin Rheumatol 16:700–706
Yen TH, Lai PC, Chen CC, Hsueh S, Huang JY (2005) Renal involvement in patients with polymyositis and dermatomyositis. Int J Clin Pract 59(2):188–193
Couvrat-Desvergnes G, Masseau A, Benveniste O, Bruel A, Hervier B, Mussini JM et al (2014) The spectrum of renal involvement in patients with inflammatory myopathies. Medicine (Baltimore) 93(1):33–41
Kim HW, Choi JR, Jang SJ, Chang YS, Bang BK, Park CW (2005) Recurrent rhabdomyolysis and myoglobinuric acute renal failure in a patient with polymyositis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 20(10):2255–2258
Cucchiari D, Angelini C (2017) Renal involvement in Idiopathic inflammatory Myopathies. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol 52(1):99–107
Thakur V, DeSalvo J, McGrath H, Weed S, Garcia C (1996) Case report: Polymyositis-induced myoglobinuric acute renal failure. Am J Med Sci 312:85–87
Lewington AJ, D’Souza R, Carr S, O’Reilly K, Warwick GL (1996) Polymyositis: a cause of acute renal failure. Nephrol Dial Transplant 11:699–701
Zager RA (1996) Rhabdomyolysis and myohemoglobinuric acute renal failure. Kidney Int 49:314–326
Marisiddappa L, Desai AM, Kedlaya PG, Sathish R (2018) Recurrent Episodic myoglobinuric acute kidney injury as presenting manifestation of idiopathic polymyositis. Saudi J Kid Dis Transpl 29(1):210–213
Bosch X, Poch E, Grau JM (2009) Rhabdomyolysis and acute kidney injury. N Engl J Med 2(1):62–72
Mantoo MR, Tripathy SK, Phulware RH, Bagri NK, Hari P, Barwad A (2019) Juvenile dermatomyositis with IgA nephropathy: case-based review. Rheumatol Int 39(3):577–581
Pattanaik D, Brown M, Postlethwaite BC, Postlethwaite AE (2015) Pathogenesis of systemic sclerosis. Front Immunol 6:272
Santaniello A, Salazar G, Lenna S, Antonioli R, Colombo G, Beretta L et al (2006) HLA-B35 upregulates the production of endothelin-1 in HLA-transfected cells: a possible pathogenetic role in pulmonary hypertension. Tissue Antigens 68(3):239–244
Lenna S, Townsend DM, Tan FK, Kapanadze B, Markiewicz M, Trojanowska M et al (2010) HLA-B35 upregulates endothelin-1 and downregulates endothelial nitric oxide synthase via endoplasmic reticulum stress response in endothelial cells. J Immunol 84(9):4654–4661
Martin JE, Assassi S, Diaz-Gallo LM, Broen JC, Simeon CP, Castellvi I et al (2013) A systemic sclerosis and systemic lupus erythematosus pan-meta-GWAS reveals new shared susceptibility loci. Hum Mol Genet 22(19):4021–4029
Penn H, Quillinan N, Khan K, Chakravarty K, Ong VH, Burns A, Denton CP (2013) Targeting the endothelin axis in scleroderma renal crisis: rationale and feasibility. QJM 106(9):839–848
Takagi K, Kawaguchi Y, Hara M, Sugiura T, Harigai M, Kamatani N (2003) Serum nitric oxide (NO) levels in systemic sclerosis patients: correlation between NO levels and clinical features. Clin Exp Immunol 134(3):538–544
Shiwen X, Leask A, Abraham DJ, Fonseca C (2009) Endothelin receptor selectivity: evidence from in vitro and pre-clinical models of scleroderma. Eur J Clin Invest 39(Suppl 2):19–26
Postlethwaite AE, Chiang TM (2007) Platelet contributions to the pathogenesis of systemic sclerosis. Curr Opin Rheumatol 19(6):574–599
Prescott RJ, Freemont AJ, Jones CJ, Hoyland J, Fielding P (1992) Sequential dermal microvascular and perivascular changes in the development of scleroderma. J Pathol 166(3):255–263
Penn H, Howie AJ, Kingdon EJ, Bunn CC, Stratton RJ, Black CM, Burns A, Denton CP (2007) Scleroderma renal crisis: patient characteristics and long-term outcomes. QJM 100(8):485–494
Helfrich DJ, Banner B, Steen VD, Medsger TA (1989) Normotensive renal failure in systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Rheum 32(9):1128–1134
Yamashita H, Kamei R, Kaneko H (2019) Classifications of scleroderma renal crisis and reconsideration of its pathophysiology. Rheumatology (Oxford) 58(12):2099–2106
Black CM, Denton CP (2005) The patient with scleroderma-systemic sclerosis. In: Davison AM, Cameron JS, Grunfeld JP, Ponticelli C, Ritz E, Winearls CG, van Ypersele C (eds) Oxford Textbook of Clinical Nephrology, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 843–854
Batal I, Domsic RT, Medsger TA, Bastacky S (2010) Scleroderma crisis: a pathology perspective. Int J Rheumatol 5:4–37. https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/543704
Ichikawa K, Konta T, Sato H, Ueda Y, Yokoyama H (2017) The clinical and pathological characteristics of nephropathies in connective tissue diseases in the Japan Renal Biopsy Registry (J-RBR). Clin Exp Nephrol 21(6):1024–1029
Traub XM (1983) Hypertension and renal failure (scleroderma renal crisis) in progressive systemic sclerosis. Review of 25 year experience with 68 cases. Medicine 62:335–352
Bose N, Chiesa-Vottero A, Chatterjee S (2015) Scleroderma renal crisis. Semin Arthritis Rheum 44(6):687–694
Turk M, Pope JE (2016) The frequency of scleroderma renal crisis over time: a metaanalysis. J Rheumatol 43(7):1350–1355
Steen JP, Shapiro AP, Medsger TA (1990) Outcome of renal crisis in systemic sclerosis: relation to availability of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. Ann Intern Med 113:352–357
Walker JG, Ahern MJ, Smith MD, Coleman M, Pile K, Rischmueller M et al (2003) Scleroderma renal crisis: poor outcome despite aggressive antihypertensive treatment. Intern Med J 33(5–6):216–220
Steen VD, Medsger TA (2000) Long-term outcomes of scleroderma renal crisis. Ann Intern Med 133:600–603
Penn H, Howie AJ, Kingdon EJ, Bunn CC, Stratton RJ, Black CM et al (2007) Scleroderma renal crisis: patient characteristics and long-term outcomes. QJM 100(8):485–494
Cozzi F, Marson P, Cardarelli S, Favaro M, Tison T, Tonello M et al (2012) Prognosis of scleroderma renal crisis: a long-term observational study. Nephrol Dial Transplant 27(12):4398–4403
Lavergne A, Pladys A, Couchoud C, Lassalle M, Vigneau C (2020) Systemic sclerosis and end-stage renal disease: study of patient characteristics, follow-up and outcomes in France. J Nephrol. 24:12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40620-020-00746-9
Caplin NJ, Dikman S, Winston J, Spiera H, Uribarri J (1999) Recurrence of scleroderma in a renal allograft from an identical twin sister. Am J Kidney Dis 33(4):7
Saxena N, Djamali A, Astor BC, Mohamed M, Mandelbrot D, Parajuli S (2017) A single center kidney transplant experience among ten Caucasian females with end-stage renal disease due to scleroderma. Clin Nephrol 88(1):40–44
Denton CP, Khanna D (2017) Systemic sclerosis. Lancet 390(10103):1685–1699
Brokmann JC, Rossaint R, Müller M, Fitzner C, Villa L, Beckers SK, Bergrath S (2017) Blood pressure management and guideline adherence in hypertensive emergencies and urgencies: a comparison between telemedically supported and conventional out-of-hospital care. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 19(7):704–712
Shah M, Patil S, Patel B, Arora S, Patel N, Garg L (2017) Trends in hospitalization for hypertensive emergency, and relationship of end-organ damage with in-hospital mortality. Am J Hypertens 30(7):700–706
van der Merwe W, van der Merwe V (2013) Malignant hypertension: a preventable emergency. N Z Med 126(1380):39–45
Zanatta E, Polito P, Favaro M, Larosa M, Marson P, Cozzi F, Doria A (2018) Therapy of scleroderma renal crisis: State of the art. Autoimmun Rev 17(9):882–889
Montanelli G, Beretta L, Santaniello A, Scorza R (2013) Effect of dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers and glucocorticoids on the prevention and development of scleroderma renal crisis in an Italian case series. Clin Exp Rheumatol 31(2 Suppl 76):135–139
Nagaraja V (2019) Management of scleroderma renal crisis. Curr Opin Rheumatol 31(3):223–230
Kfoury Baz EM, Mahfouz RA, Masri AF, Jamaleddine GW (2001) Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura in a case of scleroderma renal crisis treated with twice-daily therapeutic plasma exchange. Ren Fail 23(5):737–742
Shimizu T, Iwamoto N, Okamoto M, Endo Y, Tsuji S, Takatani A et al (2019) Scleroderma renal crisis complicated with thrombotic microangiopathy triggered by influenza b virus infection. Intern Med 58(3):441–445
Devresse A, Aydin S, Quintrec M, Demoulin N, Stordeur P, Lambert C, Gastoldi S, Pirson Y, Jadoul M, Morelle J (2016) Complement activation and effect of eculizumab in scleroderma renal crisis. Medicine (Baltimore) 95(30):44–59
Allinovi M, Cirami CL, Caroti L, Antognoli G, Farsetti S, Amato MP, Minetti EE (2017) Thrombotic microangiopathy induced by interferon beta in patients with multiple sclerosis: three cases treated with eculizumab. Clin Kidney J 10(5):625–631
Asif A, Nayer A, Haas CS (2017) Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome in the setting of complement-amplifying conditions: case reports and a review of the evidence for treatment with eculizumab. J Nephrol 30(3):347–362
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors do not have any actual or potential conflict of interest including any financial, personal or other relationships with other people or organizations within 3 years of beginning the submitted work that could inappropriately influence, or be perceived to influence, their work.
Ethical approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed consent
This type of study formal consent is not required.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ponticelli, C., Doria, A. & Moroni, G. Renal disorders in rheumatologic diseases: the spectrum is changing (Part 1: connective tissue diseases). J Nephrol 34, 1069–1080 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40620-020-00772-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40620-020-00772-7