Abstract
Purpose
Research on the engagement of fathers in the treatment of childhood psychiatric disorders is scarce. This study aims to investigate differences between mothers and fathers of adolescents with anorexia nervosa regarding parental burden and effectiveness of a parental skills training.
Methods
Ninety-one mother–father dyads caring for a child with anorexia nervosa participated in an 8-week parental skills training and completed a set of questionnaires assessing parental psychopathology, eating disorder related burden, caregiver skills and expressed emotion at baseline and post-intervention.
Results
Fathers showed lower levels of general psychological distress, depression, anxiety and eating disorder related burden as well as lower emotional overinvolvement compared to mothers. The skills training was effective in reducing parental psychopathology, eating disorder-related burden and emotional overinvolvement as well as in increasing caregiver skills with no differences between mothers and fathers. However, session adherence and the willingness to practice skills between the sessions were slightly lower in fathers.
Conclusions
These findings show that fathers are a great resource for the child’s eating disorder treatment as they may counterbalance maternal emotional overinvolvement and over-protection. Furthermore, this is the first study demonstrating that fathers can profit from a parental skills training for anorexia nervosa in a similar way as mothers.
Level III
Evidence obtained from well-designed cohort or case–control analytic studies.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
There is no doubt that parents of children and adolescents with a psychiatric disorder often face high burden, are at risk to develop own psychopathological symptoms and may show maladaptive behavior impeding the child’s recovery. Parents of adolescent patients with eating disorders, particularly anorexia nervosa, report high levels of own depression and anxiety [1, 2], accommodating behavior (e.g., maladaptive adjustment to the child’s eating behavior) [3] and adverse communication patterns, such as high criticism and overflowing emotions, summarized as "High-expressed emotion" section [4] which might maintain anorexia nervosa symptoms.
Strong parental involvement in the treatment of adolescent anorexia nervosa, for example, in family-based treatment (FBT) [5], multi-family therapy (MFT) [6] or parental skills trainings [7] is recommended to provide parents with skills supporting their child, reduce maladaptive parental behavior and parental burden. Due to their important role for recovery, parents are also often seen as co-therapists [8]. Indeed, interventions for parents of adolescents with eating disorders have shown to reduce parental distress and improve outcomes in patients [7, 9,10,11]. However, the great majority of intervention research in parents is focused on mothers. For example, a systematic review on the efficacy of caregiver intervention in eating disorders [7] revealed that the number of fathers included in the studies was very low (< 10) in most of the studies. Other studies that included a larger number of fathers did not differentiate between mothers and fathers with regard to effects calculations. Similarly, in the most recent review on caregiver interventions for eating disorders including 28 studies [9], no study reported parental differences regarding intervention effectiveness. Thus, research on the benefit of caregiver interventions for fathers is extremely scarce. This may have different reasons: fathers usually spend less time caring for their child diagnosed with an eating disorder than mothers, are often absorbed in the work role and, in this regard, often hand over responsibility to care for the mentally ill child to the mother [12, 13]. Furthermore, some fathers show difficulties in conceptualizing the child’s eating disorder as an illness which may hinder them to engage in treatment appropriately [13, 14]. Moreover, even when fathers are involved in the eating disorder treatment, they are often not included in research studies as they tend to focus on ‘primary caregivers’ (defined as the parent spending most of the time with the child, mostly mothers) and thus, systematically exclude fathers [7, 9, 10].
Stronger involvement of fathers in the treatment of adolescents with eating disorders apart from FBT and their inclusion in research is needed for the following reasons: first, there is evidence that fathers show similar eating disorder related burden and criticism towards their child as mothers [12, 15]. Second, differences in caregiving behavior between mothers and fathers (e.g., over-protective behavior in the mother, avoidant behavior in the father) may lead to a fragmented approach towards the child which in turn may contribute to the maintenance of the eating disorder pointing to the importance of developing a common understanding and coordinated care strategies between the parents [13, 14]. Third, fathers of patients with eating disorders tend to report lower levels of anxiety, depression, stress and emotional overinvolvement [12, 16, 17] as well as similar subjective skills in coping with the child’s eating disorder [18] and less fear to engage in treatment [19] compared to mothers. Moreover, it has been reported that father’s perception of family functioning was generally more realistic and more similar to the perception of the child [20]. Forth, particularly the involvement of fathers in the treatment was associated with a better outcome in the patients [15, 21]. Altogether, this literature underlines the great resource fathers may represent for the eating disorder treatment.
Currently, there is no study available that systematically investigated mother–father differences in the effectiveness of skills trainings for parents of children and adolescents with eating disorders. However, a case report pointed to the potential of skills trainings in fathers to gain understanding of the eating disorder and to improve father–child communication [14]. A qualitative study described the fathers’ change in the understanding of their parental role in the course of FBT from low involvement in the child’s care to the realization that parental collaborative care is important for the child’s recovery [22]. Few quantitative studies in parents involved in FBT or MFT showed that the reduction in high expressed emotion and eating disorder-related burden during the course of treatment was similar for mothers and fathers [15, 23, 24]. Moreover, no differences between mothers and fathers were observed regarding satisfaction with FBT [25], while FBT session adherence was lower in fathers compared to mothers [21]. However, in view of the importance of the fathers‘ involvement in the eating disorder treatment and the limited literature on the efficacy and acceptability of parental interventions in fathers, more studies are needed investigating potential parental differences.
Considering the lack of research in fathers, in the present paper we aim to analyze the differences between mothers and fathers regarding the level of parental psychopathological symptoms, eating-disorder-related burden, expressed emotion and the perceived skills level in caring for a child with anorexia nervosa. Furthermore, we aimed to investigate parental differences regarding the pre–post-effectiveness of SUCCEAT (Supporting Carers of Children and Adolescents with Eating disorders in Austria), a skills training intervention for parents of adolescents with anorexia nervosa implemented in the clinical routine at two treatment centers specialized in eating disorders in Austria. Moreover, we explored differences between mothers and fathers regarding session adherence and adherence to different intervention components as well as regarding satisfaction and acceptability with the training. The overall aim is to find out whether fathers can benefit from SUCCEAT in the same way as mothers or whether the skills training needs to be adapted for fathers in any way.
Methods
Participants and recruitment
This study used baseline and post-intervention data from routine evaluations of the SUCCEAT skills training (January 2019–July 2022) implemented in the clinical routine in two centers specialized in eating disorders in Austria (Eating Disorders Unit of the Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Medical University of Vienna, 84% of the sample; and Department for Neurology and Psychiatry of Children and Adolescents, Clinic Klagenfurt am Wörthersee, 16% of the sample). We did not find systematic differences between parents recruited from the two centers with regard to sociodemographic characteristics and baseline levels of outcome variables; thus, we reported cross-center analyses only. Parents of adolescents in inpatient or outpatient treatment for anorexia nervosa are invited to participate in the 8-week skills training SUCCEAT (see below for details), while the effectiveness of the intervention is evaluated using standardized questionnaires given to the parents prior to the start of the skills training (baseline) and directly after the intervention (approximately after 3 months). In general, both parents (mothers and fathers) are motivated to participate in the training. In contrast to previous evaluation studies of SUCCEAT [10, 26], both parents were also asked to complete the evaluation assessments. Inclusion criteria were (a) parent willing to participate in the SUCCEAT training, (b) child currently in inpatient or outpatient treatment for anorexia nervosa, (c) sufficient skills of German language to follow the SUCCEAT workshop content. For the purpose of the present study, only mother–father dyads were included. Families from which only the mother or father participated in the SUCCEAT training were excluded. Parental written informed consent was obtained prior to their inclusion in the study. Ethical approval was obtained from the Ethics Commission of the Medical University of Vienna (#1840/2013).
Intervention (SUCCEAT)
SUCCEAT is an eight-session skills training for parents originally developed by the Maudsley Hospital/King’s College London and was translated into German and adapted for parents of adolescent patients with anorexia nervosa. The intervention is based on the cognitive interpersonal maintenance model of eating disorders [27, 28] and incorporates principles of Motivational Interviewing [29]. It aims to increase parental well-being and to reduce parental burden, to provide parents with skills on how to support their child on the way towards recovery and to change intra-familiar communication patterns which may help to reduce the risk of relapse. SUCCEAT includes psychoeducational elements (e.g., etiology of anorexia nervosa and consequences of the disorder for the brain and behavior), reflection of caregiving behavior (e.g., extent of controlling behavior and emotional involvement) based on animal metaphors, a training on Motivational Interviewing skills to facilitate behavioral change in the patients, discussion of supportive parental behavior depending on the child’s motivation for change, and discussion of specific problematic behavior (e.g., vomiting, excessive exercising). Parents are advised to practice newly learned skills between the weekly sessions (called “experiments”). In addition, parents receive session handouts and are advised to read the book by Treasure et al. [30] in which further experiments are suggested. The SUCCEAT training is facilitated by two coaches (usually a psychologist and a child and adolescent psychiatrist) experienced in eating disorders who have received a training in conducting the intervention and a training in Motivation Interviewing techniques. The skills training was offered in one of three formats: (a) as face-to-face group workshops (parents of approximately eight patients each), (b) as group workshops conducted via videoconference (since the onset of COVID-19 pandemic) and (c) as online modules for self-study with weekly contact with and feedback from one of the coaches (this format was only offered until mid of 2019). The parents were not able to choose the format themselves; rather, the delivery format was predetermined by the study team considering the availability of coaches and physical distancing measures during the COVID-19 pandemic. In this study, we did not differentiate between the formats of SUCCEAT as we previously showed that the formats yielded quite similar intervention effects (Truttmann et al., 2020; SUCCEAT Team, unpublished). Moreover, mothers and fathers within a parental dyad received the same intervention format. More details on the SUCCEAT intervention content were published by Franta et al. [31].
Measures and instruments
The following instruments were obtained in parents prior to (baseline) and after (post-intervention) the SUCCEAT skills training using an online questionnaire [32].
General psychopathological distress and parental psychopathology
The General Health Questionnaire, GHQ [33] was used to assess general psychological distress (possible score range: 0–12, α = 0.91). The level of depression was obtained with the Beck Depression Inventory, BDI [34] (possible score range: 0–63, α = 0.90) with scores ≥ 14 indicating a clinically relevant depression. The State/Trait Anxiety Inventory, STAI [35] was used to obtain the current level of anxiety (state score, α = 0.90) and the general level of anxiety (trait score, α = 0.90).
Eating disorder related burden
Eating disorder related burden was measured with the Eating Disorder Symptom Impact Scale, EDSIS [36, 37] which assesses the parental burden related to the child’s eating disorder (mealtime difficulties, illness awareness, feelings of guilt, social isolation, burden related to the child’s confrontational and binge-purging behavior). The total score (α = 0.86; higher scores indicating higher general eating disorder related burden) and subscale scores (0.70 ≤ α ≤ 0.86) indicating burden in specific areas were used in the present study.
Caregiver skills
The subjective level of caregiver skills was assessed with the Caregiver Skills Scale, CASK [38, 39]. Different skills relevant for parents caring for a child with an eating disorder (including emotional intelligence, frustration tolerance, bigger picture thinking, avoidance of nagging conversations—‘Biting-tongue’, accepting the eating disorder as an illness, self-care behavior) are rated on a 0–100 scale (100 = best possible skills level). Mean scores were calculated (range: 0–100) with the total score (α = 0.94) representing the overall subjective skills level and the subscale scores (0.73 ≤ α ≤ 0.85) representing the skills level in specific areas.
High-expressed emotion
The Family Questionnaire, FQ [40] was used to obtain the level of expressed emotion including the level of criticism, CC (α = 0.92) and emotional overinvolvement, EOI (α = 0.79). Cutoff values of 23 (CC) and 27 (EOI) proposed by Wiedemann et al. [40] were used to define high-expressed emotion.
Adherence to and satisfaction with the intervention
Intervention adherence was obtained via records of session participation and by single items assessed post intervention regarding (1) their (subjective) level of active participation during the training sessions, (2) the amount of performed “experiments” between the sessions recommended by the coaches, (3) the amount of manual/book read as well as the amount of performed “experiments” suggestion in the manual/book. These items were rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = not at all/none, 5 = very often/all). Furthermore, satisfaction with the SUCCEAT intervention was assessed using single items regarding (1) general satisfaction with SUCCEAT, (2) how helpful SUCCEAT was in general, (3) the extent to which the content was implementable in contact with the child, subsequently called “practicability”, (4) the comprehensibility of the coaches’ suggestions and (5) the extent to which the intervention was stress-relieving. These items were rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = very low/bad, 5 = very high/good).
Statistical analysis
The statistical analysis was performed with IBM SPSS Statistics 27.0. First, we compared the baseline level of psychological burden, eating disorder-related burden, subjective skills level and expressed emotion between mothers and fathers using t tests for matched samples and calculating Cohen’s d effect sizes for the difference between the parents. Bonferroni-adjusted significance levels were used to account for multiple comparisons. We repeated these analyses using general linear models including the time of parental contact during weekdays as covariate. Furthermore, we calculated the percentage of clinically relevant depression scores as well as the percentage of high criticism and high emotional overinvolvement and compared mothers and fathers using McNemar tests. Second, differences between mothers and fathers regarding the SUCCEAT intervention effects (pre–post change) were analyzed using general linear mixed models (main effects of time and parent, time x parent interaction effect; controlled for the SUCCEAT delivery format). Again, we used Bonferroni-corrected significance levels to account for multiple testing. Third, we investigated mother–father differences regarding intervention adherence and satisfaction using a t test for matched samples (number of workshop sessions completed) and Wilcoxon signed rank tests (single items measuring adherence to different intervention components and satisfaction).
Results
Sample characteristics
The sample consisted of 91 mother–father dyads who have participated in the study between January 2019 and December 2022. The majority of data were obtained during the COVID-19 pandemic period (70.3%), while the remaining data were obtained prior to the start of the pandemic (29.7%). Most parental dyads were married and lived in the same household (89%). The main characteristics of the mother–father dyads are shown in Table 1. Fathers were comparable to mothers with regard to age, educational level, nationality, employment status and the presence of a lifetime psychiatric disorder. However, fathers had more weekly working hours compared to mothers. A higher percentage of mothers was affected by an own lifetime eating disorder and mothers had more contact to the child with the eating disorder during weekdays compared to fathers. The majority of mother–father dyads participated in the videoconference format of SUCCEAT (69.2%), 15.4% received the face-to-face workshop format and 15.4% the online modules format.
The adolescents diagnosed with anorexia nervosa were predominantly female (97.8%), had a mean age of 14.69 (SD: 2.10) and an eating disorder duration of 9.69 months (SD: 8.00) on average. At the timepoint of the parents’ participation in the SUCCEAT intervention, 61.5% of patients received outpatient treatment and 38.5% received inpatient treatment for anorexia nervosa.
Parental burden and skills levels prior to the SUCCEAT intervention
At baseline, fathers showed significantly lower levels of general psychological distress, depression, actual level of anxiety, eating disorder related burden and emotional overinvolvement compared to mothers, while these effects were medium-sized (see Table 2 for details). Fathers further tended to have lower scores on trait anxiety and criticism as well as higher self-rated caregiver skills compared to mothers; however, effect sizes were low and differences did not reach statistical significance on a Bonferroni-corrected significance level. We repeated these analyses using the amount of contact with the child during weekdays as potential confounding variable. Indeed, this variable neither had an impact on the outcome variables, nor changed the pattern of results presented in Table 2.
Looking at the EDSIS subdomains, we observed that mothers showed higher scores in the ‘mealtime difficulties’ (p = 0.001), ‘illness awareness’ (p < 0.001) and ‘guilt’ (p = 0.003) subscales compared to fathers. CASK subscale analyses yielded significantly higher scores in the ‘self-care’ (p < 0.001) and ‘acceptance’ (p < 0.001) subscales for fathers compared to mothers.
With regard to the established cutoff in the BDI questionnaire, a significantly lower percentage of fathers (18.7%) compared to mothers (44.4%) showed clinically relevant depression scores (McNemar: p = 0.004). Regarding high-expressed emotion, a lower percentage of fathers (25.3% vs. 47.8% in mothers) showed elevated emotional overinvolvement (McNemar: p < 0.001), while there was no difference regarding the percentage of elevated criticism scores (fathers: 26.4% vs. mothers: 36.7%, McNemar: p = 0.286).
Differences between fathers and mothers regarding the SUCCEAT intervention effects
The following results are based on a sample of 70 mother–father dyads who have completed both, baseline and post-intervention assessments. The GLMM models revealed a statistically significant effect of time for the majority of outcome variables (except for the STAI trait and FQ CC scores) indicating a baseline-to-post-intervention reduction in parental psychopathology, burden and emotional overinvolvement as well as an increase in caregiver skills. Noteworthy, there were no time x parent interaction effects for any of the outcome variables indicating that the improvements in outcome scores are independent from the caregiver’s sex (see Table 3). The statistically significant main effects of the parent found for most of the outcome scores reflected the mother–father differences observed at baseline (Table 2).
Parental differences regarding intervention adherence and satisfaction
The average number of completed sessions was slightly but significantly lower in fathers (5.96 out of 8 sessions, SD: 2.38) compared to mothers (6.52 out of 8 sessions, SD: 1.84; t = 2.051, p = 0.043). Fathers reported having done less experiments between the workshop session compared to mothers (p = 0.001). No statistically significant differences between mothers and fathers were observed for other adherence variables (extent of active participation during the workshop session, amount of the manual/book read, amount of experiments done suggested by the manual/book, see Fig. 1a). With regard to acceptability and satisfaction, we did not find statistically significant differences between the parents in any of the considered variables (Fig. 1b). Noteworthy, the great majority of mothers (92.7%) and fathers (93.2%) reported to be very satisfied or quite satisfied with the SUCCEAT intervention in general.
Discussion
This paper aimed to investigate differences in mother–father dyads regarding parental burden, caregiving behavior and skills for caring for an adolescent with anorexia nervosa as well as mother–father differences regarding the effectiveness of a parental skills training. Fathers showed lower psychological distress, psychopathology, eating disorder-related burden and emotional overinvolvement compared to mothers which was independent from the amount of time spent for caregiving. Improvements in outcome variables from baseline to the post-intervention assessment were similar for mothers and fathers. Adherence to the intervention sessions and the amount of exercises performed between the sessions were slightly lower in fathers compared to mothers, while there were no parental differences reading satisfaction and acceptability with SUCCEAT.
In line with the literature [12, 17, 24], fathers showed lower levels of adverse emotional reactions (symptoms of depression, anxiety and emotional overinvolvement) compared to mothers. Less paternal emotional involvement might also be reflected by greater self-care behavior and higher acceptance of the child’s eating disorder found in fathers in the present study. Rienecke and Richmond [41] highlighted that mothers and fathers tend to react differently to the child’s eating disorder with mothers often showing more anxious behavior and fathers often using more cognitive and avoiding strategies to cope with the illness. While overly rational behavior may be perceived by the child as rejection, less paternal emotional responses may also be advantageous. As emphasized by Treasure [13], fathers may counterbalance maternal over-protective behavior and emotional overinvolvement and thus, may be well suited to support the child through “calm encouragement” (p. 386). Indeed, the most pronounced parental difference found in the present study was the higher level of emotional overinvolvement in mothers.
In contrast to another study that found similar levels of eating disorder related burden [15], we observed higher levels of burden (including feelings of guilt and perceived difficulties during mealtimes) in mothers compared to fathers. As burden levels were previously associated with the amount of time for caregiving [12], this was not the case in the present study indicating that fathers may feel less burdened by the child’s eating disorder per se. However, general sex differences in disclosing specific negative emotions such as guilt must be taken into account when interpreting these results [42]. Lower paternal levels of burden, stress and psychopathology potentially give father more power to actively engage in the treatment which may counterbalance higher burden levels in mothers. In sum, the current study highlights the potential of fathers for the eating disorder treatment of their child and encourages greater involvement of fathers in the future.
This is the first study showing that fathers can profit from a parental skills training for adolescent anorexia nervosa in a similar way than mothers do. Indeed, the reduction in psychopathology and burden levels as well as in emotional overinvolvement and the increase in caregiver skills levels did not differ between the parents. This is line with previous research on the parental effects of FBT and MFT [15, 23] showing that both parents can similarly profit from the interventions. This study, therefore, expands the literature on the effectiveness of caregiver interventions in eating disorder that had a strong focus on mothers [7, 9]. The level of criticism towards the child, however, did not significantly decrease for both parents which is consistent with other studies showing that criticism was an outcome variable that is difficult to change and prone to rise again in the long-term [23, 24]. Thus, strengthening intervention content on communication skills to reduce critical comments towards the child’s behavior should be considered.
Although fathers tended to participate in less intervention sessions compared to mothers, the overall paternal adherence rate was high which is not self-evident considering the significantly low engagement levels of fathers in behavioral trainings for other childhood psychiatric disorders [43]. Moreover, it should be considered that the participation of mothers and fathers in a skills training at the same time might be difficult per se as other responsibilities (e.g., care for younger children) may be a hindering factor. Thus, the high adherence rates observed in both parents in the present study highlights the high general engagement level of the parents. High paternal adherence to a parental intervention may not only be important for reducing their burden associated with the child’s mental health disorder but also indirectly as outlined by Hughes et al. [21]. This study discussed that high engagement of fathers may signal to the adolescents that they care about them and that they are committed to their recovery. Moreover, also mothers may feel better supported in their caregiver role which may be beneficial for family cohesion in general. The fact that there was no difference between mothers and fathers regarding the extent to which they actively participated during the workshop sessions indicates that fathers have not just been passive listeners handing over the main responsibility to the mothers as previously regarded as a main challenge [22]. However, the findings from this study indicate that fathers, a bit more than mothers, need to be motivated to practice the newly learned skills with the child. To reach the maximum impact of SUCCEAT, this should be considered in future parental trainings. Finally, we found very high satisfaction with SUCCEAT for both parents. Particularly for fathers, this finding is promising as previous research has pointed to paternal difficulties in expressing emotions or reflecting about own emotional reactions to the child’s eating disorder [22] which are key elements of SUCCEAT. This underlies the usefulness of the SUCCEAT skills training for both parents.
Strengths and limitations
Strengths of this study are the inclusion of a relatively large sample of parents with anorexia nervosa and the focus on mother–father dyads which allows a direct comparison between mothers and fathers independent from the child’s symptomatology, the timepoint of inclusion in the study and the intervention format. However, this study also has the following limitations. We do not have data from parents who did not participate in the skills training; thus, particularly the sample of fathers might be restricted to those who were motivated to learn more about the child’s eating disorder and to change their caregiving behavior. Moreover, we only obtained parental burden, caregiver skills and behavior from a subjective level. Thus, general sex differences in expressing psychopathological symptoms and burden might have influenced the results. More objective measures of caregiver skills and behavior, for example, by behavioral observation techniques, may provide additional insight to mother–father differences. Furthermore, we only obtained the short-term effectiveness of SUCCEAT in this study. Therefore, we do not know whether the improvements observed in fathers are sustained as previously shown in a sample of primary caregivers (mostly mothers) [10]. Finally, in the present study we neither obtained the symptomatology of the adolescents with anorexia nervosa, nor its change over the course of treatment. Thus, we cannot answer the question whether the involvement of both parents in the skills training is beneficial for the child’s recovery. SUCCEAT participation of (primarily) mothers has been previously linked to improvements in the child’s eating disorder outcome [32]; however, the specific role of fathers for improvements in the psychopathology of the patients’ needs to be further investigated. Future studies may, for example, focus on how mothers’ and fathers’ involvement in the treatment change their attitudes, insight and behavior regarding the eating disorder and how this, in turn, affects the child’s treatment course.
What is already known on this subject?
Mothers often take on the main responsibility of caring for a child with anorexia nervosa and experience high level of psychological distress. Previous research focusing on mothers has demonstrated high effectiveness of parental skills trainings in reducing burden and improving caregiver skills.
What this study adds?
This study showed that fathers of adolescent patients with anorexia nervosa showed less psychological distress, eating disorder related burden and emotional overinvolvement compared to mothers. It is also one of the fist studies demonstrating that fathers can similarly profit from a specialized parental skills training as mothers. A greater involvement of fathers in the adolescent eating disorder treatment is thus highly encouraged.
Conclusion
To conclude, due to lower levels of emotional overinvolvement, anxiety and depression, fathers are a great resource for the collaborative care in adolescent anorexia nervosa. The present study indicates that fathers can profit from a parental skills training in a similar way as mothers. Thus, they should be involved in the child’s treatment to a greater extent to reach a joint parental understanding of the disorder and how to support the child best on his/her way towards recovery. A greater involvement of fathers may also relieve the burden of mothers who are often under a great deal of strain. Fathers should be motivated to participate in as many intervention sessions as possible and to practice the newly learned skills with the child between the sessions. However, parental differences regarding intervention adherence were small and might not be practically relevant. The present results may also be inspiring for the research on the inclusion of fathers in the treatment of other psychiatric disorders in childhood and adolescence. Burden and suffering of parents, including fathers, when caring for a child with a mental illness might be enormous. Providing professional parental support through structured trainings for both, mothers and fathers, may induce “precious moments with the child” and enables parents to “bring new hope to the affected child” (quotes from a father having participated in the SUCCEAT intervention).
Data availability
The data related to this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Anastasiadou D, Medina-Pradas C, Sepulveda AR, Treasure J (2014) A systematic review of family caregiving in eating disorders. Eat Behav 15:464–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eatbeh.2014.06.001
Kyriacou O, Treasure J, Schmidt U (2008) Understanding how parents cope with living with someone with anorexia nervosa: modelling the factors that are associated with carer distress. Int J Eat Disord 41:233–242. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.20488
Anderson LM, Smith KE, Nuñez MC, Farrell NR (2021) Family accommodation in eating disorders: a preliminary examination of correlates with familial burden and cognitive-behavioral treatment outcome. Eat Disord 29:327–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/10640266.2019.1652473
Zabala MJ, Macdonald P, Treasure J (2009) Appraisal of caregiving burden, expressed emotion and psychological distress in families of people with eating disorders: a systematic review. Eur Eat Disord Rev 17:338–349. https://doi.org/10.1002/erv.925
Couturier J, Kimber M, Szatmari P (2013) Efficacy of family-based treatment for adolescents with eating disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Eat Disord 46:3–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.22042
Baudinet J, Eisler I, Dawson L, Simic M, Schmidt U (2021) Multi-family therapy for eating disorders: a systematic scoping review of the quantitative and qualitative findings. Int J Eat Disord 54:2095–2120. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.23616
Hibbs R, Rhind C, Leppanen J, Treasure J (2015) Interventions for caregivers of someone with an eating disorder: a meta-analysis. Int J Eat Disord 48:349–361. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.22298
Altdorf S, Dempfle A, Heider K, Seitz J, Herpertz-Dahlmann B, Dahmen B. Parents as co-therapists in home treatment for adolescents with anorexia nervosa—factors and mechanisms. Prax Kinderpsychol Kinderpsychiatr. 2022;71:467–86. https://doi.org/10.13109/prkk.2022.71.5.467
Hannah L, Cross M, Baily H, Grimwade K, Clarke T, Allan SM (2022) A systematic review of the impact of carer interventions on outcomes for patients with eating disorders. Eat Weight Disord Stud Anorex Bulim Obes 27:1953–1962. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-021-01338-7
Truttmann S, Philipp J, Zeiler M, Franta C, Wittek T, Merl E, et al. Long-Term Efficacy of the Workshop Vs. Online SUCCEAT (Supporting Carers of Children and Adolescents with Eating Disorders) Intervention for Parents: A Quasi-Randomised Feasibility Trial. J Clin Med. 2020;9:1912. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9061912
Philipp J, Franta C, Zeiler M, Truttmann S, Wittek T, Imgart H et al (2021) Does a skills intervention for parents have a positive impact on adolescents’ anorexia nervosa outcome? Answers from a quasi-randomised feasibility trial of SUCCEAT. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18:4656. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18094656
Rhind C, Salerno L, Hibbs R, Micali N, Schmidt U, Gowers S et al (2016) The objective and subjective caregiving burden and caregiving behaviours of parents of adolescents with anorexia nervosa. Eur Eat Disord Rev 24:310–319. https://doi.org/10.1002/erv.2442
Treasure J (2018) Inclusion of fathers in the treatment of eating disorders. Lancet Child Adolesc Health 2:385–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-4642(18)30136-6
Treasure J, Schmidt U, Kan C (2019) An illustration of collaborative care with a focus on the role of fathers in Maudsley Anorexia Nervosa Treatment for Adults (MANTRA). J Clin Psychol 75:1403–1414. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22789
Dennhag I, Henje E, Nilsson K (2021) Parental caregiver burden and recovery of adolescent anorexia nervosa after multi-family therapy. Eat Disord 29:463–479. https://doi.org/10.1080/10640266.2019.1678980
Le Grange D, Hoste RR, Lock J, Bryson SW (2011) Parental expressed emotion of adolescents with anorexia nervosa: outcome in family-based treatment. Int J Eat Disord 44:731–734. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.20877
Martín J, Padierna A, Aguirre U, González N, Muñoz P, Quintana JM (2013) Predictors of quality of life and caregiver burden among maternal and paternal caregivers of patients with eating disorders. Psychiatry Res 210:1107–1115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2013.07.039
Vintró-Alcaraz C, Mestre-Bach G, Steward T, Lozano-Madrid M, Agüera Z, Jiménez-Murcia S et al (2018) Validation of the caregiver skills (CASK) scale in Catalonia: concordance between caregivers in attitudes and behaviours. Eur Eat Disord Rev 26:329–336. https://doi.org/10.1002/erv.2604
Stillar A, Merali N, Gusella J, Scarborough J, Nash P, Orr E et al (2023) Caring for a child with an eating disorder: understanding differences among mothers and fathers of adolescent and adult children. Eur Eat Disord Rev 31:87–97. https://doi.org/10.1002/erv.2935
Amianto F, Bertorello A, Spalatro A, Milazzo M, Signa C, Cavarero S et al (2014) Adlerian parental counseling in eating disorders: preliminary data of a controlled clinical trial. Eat Weight Disord 19:303–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-013-0079-y
Hughes EK, Burton C, Le Grange D, Sawyer SM (2018) The participation of mothers, fathers, and siblings in family-based treatment for adolescent anorexia nervosa. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 47:S456–S466. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2017.1390756
McMahon K, Stoddart K, Harris F (2022) Rescripting—a grounded theory study of the contribution that fathers make to Family-Based Treatment when a young person has anorexia nervosa. J Clin Nurs 31:1598–1611. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.16013
Moskovich AA, Timko CA, Honeycutt LK, Zucker NL, Merwin RM (2017) Change in Expressed Emotion and Treatment Outcome in Adolescent Anorexia Nervosa. Eat Disord 25:80–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/10640266.2016.125511
Schwarte R, Timmesfeld N, Dempfle A, Krei M, Egberts K, Jaite C et al (2017) Expressed emotions and depressive symptoms in caregivers of adolescents with first-onset anorexia nervosa-a long-term investigation over 2.5 years. Eur Eat Disord Rev 25:44–51. https://doi.org/10.1002/erv.2490
Halvorsen I, Rø Ø (2019) User satisfaction with family-based inpatient treatment for adolescent anorexia nervosa: retrospective views of patients and parents. J Eat Disord 7:12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-019-0242-6
Philipp J, Truttmann S, Zeiler M, Franta C, Wittek T, Schöfbeck G et al (2020) Reduction of high expressed emotion and treatment outcomes in anorexia nervosa—caregivers’ and adolescents’ perspective. J Clin Med 9:2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9072021
Schmidt U, Treasure J (2006) Anorexia nervosa: valued and visible. A cognitive-interpersonal maintenance model and its implications for research and practice. Br J Clin Psychol 45:343–366. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466505x53902
Treasure J, Willmott D, Ambwani S, Cardi V, Clark Bryan D, Rowlands K et al (2020) Cognitive interpersonal model for anorexia nervosa revisited: the perpetuating factors that contribute to the development of the severe and enduring illness. J Clin Med 9:630. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9030630
Miller WR, Rollnick S (2002) Motivational interviewing: Preparing for change, 2nd edn. Guilford, New York
Treasure J, Smith G, Crane A, Karwautz A, Wagner G, Philipp J, et al. Unterstützung für Angehörige von Menschen mit Essstörungen ein Leitfaden für Eltern, Geschwister, Partner und Fachpersonal. Facultas, Routledge; 2020.
Franta C, Philipp J, Waldherr K, Truttmann S, Merl E, Schöfbeck G et al (2018) Supporting Carers of Children and Adolescents with Eating Disorders in Austria (SUCCEAT): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Eur Eat Disord Rev 26:447–461. https://doi.org/10.1002/erv.2600
LimeSurvey GmbH. LimeSurvey: An Open Source survey tool [Internet]. Hamburg: LimeSurvey GmbH; 2017. http://www.limesurvey.org
Goldberg DP, Gater R, Sartorius N, Ustun TB, Piccinelli M, Gureje O et al (1997) The validity of two versions of the GHQ in the WHO study of mental illness in general health care. Psychol Med 27:191–197. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291796004242
Beck AT, Steer RA, Brown GM (1996) Manual for the beck depression inventory-II. Psychological Corporation, San Antonio
Spielberger CD, Gorsuch RL, Lushene R, Vagg PR, Jacobs GA (1983) Manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory. Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto
Sepulveda AR, Whitney J, Hankins M, Treasure J (2008) Development and validation of an Eating Disorders Symptom Impact Scale (EDSIS) for carers of people with eating disorders. Health Qual Life Outcomes 6:28. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-6-28
Zeiler M, Truttmann S, Philipp J, Kahlenberg L, Wittek T, Franta C et al (2023) An investigation of the factor structure of a German version of the Eating Disorder Symptom Impact Scale (EDSIS) among parents of adolescents and young adults with anorexia nervosa. Eat Behav 48:101695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eatbeh.2022.101695
Hibbs R, Rhind C, Salerno L, Lo Coco G, Goddard E, Schmidt U et al (2015) Development and validation of a scale to measure caregiver skills in eating disorders. Int J Eat Disord 48:290–297. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.22362
Zeiler M, Philipp J, Truttmann S, Wittek T, Franta C, Imgart H et al (2021) A German version of the Caregiver Skills scale for caregivers of patients with anorexia nervosa. Eur Eat Disord Rev 29:257–268. https://doi.org/10.1002/erv.2817
Wiedemann G, Rayki O, Feinstein E, Hahlweg K (2002) The Family Questionnaire: development and validation of a new self-report scale for assessing expressed emotion. Psychiatry Res 109:265–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-1781(02)00023-9
Rienecke RD, Richmond RL (2017) Psychopathology and expressed emotion in parents of patients with eating disorders: Relation to patient symptom severity. Eat Disord 25:318–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/10640266.2017.1289795
Else-Quest NM, Higgins A, Allison C, Morton LC (2012) Gender differences in self-conscious emotional experience: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull 138:947–981. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027930
Fabiano GA (2007) Father participation in behavioral parent training for ADHD: review and recommendations for increasing inclusion and engagement. J Fam Psychol 43(21):683–693. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.21.4.683
Funding
Open access funding provided by Medical University of Vienna. The development of the “SUCCEAT” intervention was funded by “Gemeinsame Gesundheitsziele—Pharma Master Agreement” (a cooperation between the Austrian pharmaceutical industry and the Austrian social insurance)—project code: 99901002500.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization: JP, ST, GW; methodology: MZ, JP; investigation: JP, ST, TW, KK, GS, DM, EA-W; formal analysis: MZ, data curation: MZ; visualization: MZ; writing—original draft preparation: MZ; writing—review and editing: JP, TW, KK, GW; project administration: ES; funding acquisition: AK, GW; resources: GS, EA-W, AK; supervision: GW, AK.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
J.P., S.T., T.W., K.K., G.S., D.M., and E. A.-W. conducted the SUCCEAT workshop intervention. A.K., G.W., J.P. and T.W. are translators of the book recommended during the SUCCEAT intervention.
Ethical approval
This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the Ethics Committee of Medical University of Vienna (#1840/2013).
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Zeiler, M., Philipp, J., Truttmann, S. et al. Fathers in the spotlight: parental burden and the effectiveness of a parental skills training for anorexia nervosa in mother–father dyads. Eat Weight Disord 28, 65 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-023-01597-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-023-01597-6