Abstract
Purpose
We aimed to analyze the association between common polymorphisms in dopamine pathways with personality dimensions frequently present in patients with eating disorders (ED).
Methods
A total of 324 patients [210 with anorexia nervosa (AN), 80 with bulimia nervosa (BN) and 34 with binge-eating disorder (BED)] were diagnosed according to DSM-5 criteria and interviewed using the EDI 2 and SCL-90R questionnaires at the eating disorders unit. Blood samples were drawn and the DNA screened for polymorphisms in dopamine receptor genes (DRD2 A2/A1 and DRD3 Ser9Gly) and in the dopamine transporter DAT1 10R/9R.
Results
AN patients who carried the DRD3 Gly9Gly genotype displayed significantly higher EDI-2 total scores than patients with the Ser9 allele (118.09 ± 8.75 vs. 97.23 ± 2.73, p = 0.010). In these patients, Gly9Gly carriers also showed higher scores in all the individuals’ EDI-2 scales. Differences were especially relevant for bulimia (p = 0.004), ineffectiveness (p = 0.044), interpersonal distrust (p = 0.037), interoceptive awareness (p = 0.006) and maturity fears (p = 0.038). Epistasis analyses showed a strong effect of the interaction between DRD3 Ser9Gly and DRD2 A2A1 on the bulimia (p < 0.05), ineffectiveness (p < 0.05) and asceticism (p < 0.01) scales, as well as on the EDI-2 total score (p < 0.05). The scores of the SCL-90R inventory were largely unaffected by the presence of the polymorphisms.
Conclusion
Whilst no associations were found for the BN and BED groups, our results suggest that women with AN carrying the homozygous variant Gly9Gly genotype in the dopamine D3 receptor have significantly worse ED-related symptomatology.
Level of evidence
Level III (evidence obtained from well-designed cohort or case–control analytic studies).
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Twin and family studies have established high heritability estimates for disordered eating behavior; therefore, a significant genetic influence can be assumed for these pathologies [1]. As a result, numerous candidate gene studies have been carried out to assess the implication of neurotransmitters, hormones and proteins in the etiology of eating disorders (ED) and/or in personality dimensions that are often coupled with ED. Amongst these compounds, dopamine, given its participation in the regulation of feeding behavior, motor activity, the distortion of body image and reward and reinforcement processes [2], has been suggested to play a relevant role in anorexia nervosa (AN) [3], bulimia nervosa (BN) [4] and binge-eating disorder (BED) [5]. In consequence, genes involved in dopaminergic routes are considered suitable candidates for association studies in patients with ED.
Most of the initial studies in this setting, including some carried out by our group, focused on the genes coding for catechol-ortho-methyltransferase (COMT) [6, 7], which is responsible for the metabolism of dopamine in the brain, or for the highly polymorphic dopamine D4 receptor [8, 9]. However, there seems to be less available information for the dopamine DAT1 (SLC6A3) transporter and for the D2 or D3 receptors. In this regard, a variable number of tandem repeats in the promoter region of the DAT1 gene (VNTR, rs28363170) has been found, with the 9-repeat (R) variant apparently decreasing the reuptake of this neurotransmitter compared with the 10R allele [10]. With regard to dopamine receptors 2 and 3 (DRD2-3), the TaqIA restriction endonuclease site in the DRD2 gene (A2/A1, rs1800497) has been shown to reduce the density of D2 autoreceptors in the striatum [11]. Finally, a substitution of Serine for Glycine in aminoacid 9 of the DRD3 protein (rs6280) increases the affinity for endogenous dopamine [12].
The available information on the putative clinical implications of these three polymorphisms in patients with ED is scarce, especially from the point of view of their influence on associated personality dimensions. Indeed, psychological traits and comorbid personality disorders are often overlooked in genetic association studies on ED; however, we have previously shown that certain traits in these patients can be influenced by variability in the loci of central genes [13,14,15,16,17,18]. In the present study, we have aimed to analyze the association between the aforementioned three common polymorphisms in the dopaminergic pathways (DAT1 VNTR 10R/9R, DRD2 A2/A1 and DRD3 Ser9Gly) with personality dimensions that are frequently present in patients with AN, BN or BED.
Patients and methods
The study group included 324 consecutive female patients with ED (210 with AN, 80 with BN and 34 with BED). Patients visited the Eating Disorder Unit of the Institute of Mental Disorders (Badajoz, Spain) and were interviewed and diagnosed by one psychiatrist and one psychologist using the ED section of the Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th ed. Diagnosis was blind to genotype and was later re-evaluated to comply with the new DSM-5 guidelines. The patients were referred to the Unit by their general practitioners due to the indications of a possible ED (significant alterations in weight, presence of suggestive psychological characteristics, etc.). Exclusion criteria for the study, determined after screening, included neurological disorders (such as mental retardation, dementia or Turner syndrome) and underlying endocrine pathologies. All the participants were Spanish Caucasian females living in the Health District of Badajoz (Southwest Spain).
The study protocol was approved by the Bioethics Committee of the University of Extremadura and was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and its subsequent revisions. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients for their inclusion in the study.
Psychometric evaluation
The evaluation of the general psychopathological parameters in patients with ED was carried out with the Eating Disorders Inventory Test-2 (EDI-2) and the revised Symptom Checklist 90 (SCL-90R) questionnaire. EDI-2 was designed to evaluate ED-related cognitive and behavioral characteristics by initially measuring eight main subscales: drive for thinness, bulimia, body dissatisfaction, inefficacy, perfectionism, interpersonal distrust, interoceptive awareness and maturity fears [19]. In a second version of the test, three more subscales were added: asceticism, impulse regulation and social insecurity. The EDI-2 test has been validated in the Spanish population showing high consistency between the different subscales [20]. The second inventory utilized, SCL-90R, is composed of three global indices [global severity index (GSI), designed to measure general psychological distress; Positive Symptoms Distress Index (PSDI), designed to measure the intensity of symptoms and total positive symptoms (PST)], which shows the number of self-reported symptoms, in addition to the nine main dimensions of the symptoms (somatization, depression, anxiety, hostility, phobic anxiety, paranoid ideation and psychoticism) [21]. This test has shown a sufficient invariance in the measurement of the items, validated in the Spanish population [22], which is why it is considered a good tool to evaluate the general psychological state in adolescent psychiatric patients [23].
Genotype analysis
Genomic DNA was isolated from whole blood samples using a standard phenol–chloroform extraction method. Standard real-time PCR methods were used for the identification of the polymorphisms considered. Reactions were performed using Taqman probes purchased from Thermofisher (Waltham, Massachusetts, USA). These three polymorphisms, namely DRD2 A2/A1 (rs1800497), DRD3 Ser9Gly (rs6280) and DAT1 10R/9R (rs28363170), were selected based on their reported impact on gene function/expression and/or their involvement in psychiatric conditions [24].
Statistical analysis
Scores obtained for the EDI-2 and SCL-90R questionnaires are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) values. Chi-square or Fisher tests were performed to compare the frequencies of alleles and genotypes. Differences of quantitative variables between ED subgroups were assessed with Student’s t/Mann–Whitney or ANOVA/Kruskal–Wallis tests, depending on the normality of the data and the number of groups involved. Logistic regression models adjusted by age were used to analyze the association of single marker using the SNPassoc R package [25]. This software is available at https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/SNPassoc/index.html and it is used to obtain descriptive statistics, exploratory analyses of missing values, calculation of Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium and analysis of associations based on generalized linear models (either for quantitative or binary traits).
Gene–gene interaction (epistasis) analyses were performed using log-likelihood ratio tests adjusted by age (SNPassoc package) in a codominant model. In the resulting plots, the diagonal line contains the p values from likelihood ratio test for the crude effect of each SNP, which are sorted by their genomic position. The upper triangle in the matrix contains the p values for the interaction (epistasis) log-likelihood ratio test. Finally, the lower triangle contains the p values from likelihood ratio test comparing the two-SNP additive likelihood to the best of the single-SNP models.
Results
Mean weights for AN, BN and BED patients were, respectively, 45.47 ± 6.85, 66.47 ± 21.67 and 94.78 ± 33.51 kg, whilst BMI values were 17.60 ± 2.24, 25.61 ± 8.99 and 35.42 ± 11.52 kg/m2 for the same three groups. As expected, age at onset showed differences between the AN, BN and BED groups, with AN patients being significantly younger than women with BN and BED (Table 1). In addition, the global scores in the inventories that evaluated personality dimensions were found to be consistently higher in BN patients than in patients with AN or BED, with marked differences in the case of the EDI-2 questionnaire (123.2 ± 40.5, 90.1 ± 46.2 and 96.2 ± 40.0 for the three groups; p < 10e−6, Table 1). In this inventory, post hoc tests showed that differences were statistically significant when comparing the BN vs. AN groups (p < 10e−7) and the BN vs. BED groups (p = 0.003), but not when AN and BED patients were compared (p = 0.255).
Table 2 shows the observed genotype distribution for the three polymorphisms assayed, namely DAT1 VNTR, DRD2 A2/A1 and DRD3 Ser9Gly, in the three different diagnosis groups. Obtained frequencies showed no deviations from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium. There were no differences between AN, BN and BED with regard to the distribution of the different genotypes (p > 0.05 in all cases).
With regard to the psychometric evaluation, we observed that while the three indices of the SCL-90R inventory were largely unaffected by the presence of the SNPs (Supplementary Table 1), women with ED who carried the DRD3 Gly9Gly genotype displayed significantly higher EDI-2 total scores than the rest of patients did (118.09 ± 8.75 vs. 97.23 ± 2.73, p = 0.010, Table 3). Furthermore, when the population was stratified by diagnosis, AN patients followed the same pattern, with recessive Gly9Gly genotypes correlating with far higher EDI-2 scores after Bonferroni correction of the data (114.32 ± 12.00 vs. 87.43 ± 3.25 in Ser9 carriers, p = 0.010). The only other significant association was observed in the BED group, as patients with the 9Gly variant also showed higher scores than Ser9Ser carriers (110.18 ± 36.21 vs. 76.42 ± 38.02, p = 0.018). Only two individuals in the BED group harbored the homozygous variant genotype and hence the recessive model could not be formally applied as it was for the other ED. Table 3 shows EDI-2 global scores according to the three SNPs analyzed in all diagnosis groups.
Next, to further investigate the association observed between the Ser9Gly SNP and the psychometric evaluation in AN patients, we assessed the effect of the Gly9Gly genotype on each individual dimension evaluated by the EDI-2 questionnaire. Figure 1 shows that in all 11 scales, Gly9Gly carriers always displayed higher scores than carriers of the Ser9 wild-type allele. These differences were significant for bulimia, ineffectiveness, interpersonal distrust, interoceptive awareness and maturity fears (Fig. 1). After correction for the three SNPs assayed, the associations with bulimia and interoceptive awareness retained significance.
The analysis of how the other two SNPs affected EDI-2 individual scales showed that, in the AN group, DAT1 9R/9R carriers had higher scores for both bulimia and asceticism compared with 10R/10R-10R/9R carriers (6.03 ± 6.12 vs, 5.18 ± 6.20, p = 0.046 and 8.90 ± 5.20, p = 0.004, respectively). Finally, DRD2 A1/A1 carriers displayed elevated scores for perfectionism (7.70 ± 4.45 vs. 5.99 ± 4.10, p = 0.014) and ineffectiveness (14.60 ± 9.74 vs. 11.02 ± 7.95, p = 0.042). Only the associations with asceticism and perfectionism retained significance after Bonferroni correction of the analysis.
Gene–Gene interactions
Figure 2 shows interactions between genetic variability in the three assayed genes with regard to their effect on personality dimensions in the AN patients measured by the EDI-2 questionnaire. Bulimia was the scale mostly affected by these interactions, with significant associations for the DRD3 Ser9Gly–DRD2 A2A1 (p < 0.05) and DRD3 Ser9Gly–DAT1 10R/9R (p < 0.05) SNP pairs. In general, the effect of epistasis was more profound for the interaction between DRD3 Ser9Gly and DRD2 A2A1, as seen in the bulimia (p < 0.05), ineffectiveness (p < 0.05) and asceticism (p < 0.01) scales as well as in the EDI-2 total score (p < 0.05) (Fig. 2).
Discussion
Serotonin was the first neurotransmitter that attracted the researchers’ attention with regard to genetic association studies in ED. However, dopaminergic genes are gradually gaining interest in this field, both because dopamine plays a key function in reward and reinforcement processes [2, 5], and because dopaminergic signaling is pivotal to many of the ED-associated comorbidities. These comorbid disorders are frequently as protracted and impairing as the ED itself is [26,27,28,29]; therefore, the study of how genetic variability can make patients more prone to develop certain psychopathological traits and personality dimensions is of great interest in the ED setting.
Our results show that AN patients carrying the DRD3 Gly9Gly genotype had not only significantly elevated scores for the EDI-2 global results, but also displayed higher scores in all the personality dimensions evaluated with this inventory. To our knowledge, there are no studies that have addressed the effect of this SNP on the psychological features of AN patients. However, in other pathologies, the 9Gly variant has also been related to traits such as impulsive behavior [30] or depression [31] in patients with Parkinson’s disease, suicide behavior in schizophrenics [32], substance dependence [33, 34], novelty seeking [35] or obsessive–compulsive personality trait [36].
Dopamine is involved in the reward system at several levels, being the “wanting” aspect of it, meaning the pursuit of reward through attribution of incentive motivation to reward-related stimuli, where this neurotransmitter seems to be primarily involved [37]. A hypothesis has been formulated in which the stress induced by food deprivation in AN may stimulate dopamine-dependent reward systems. This could in turn sensitize the mesolimbic reward system and amplify cues previously experienced as rewarding (e.g., food restriction or exercise). This would result in a dopamine-mediated pathological drive for illness-related reward eventually leading to anorectic psychopathology [3, 38]. According to this theory, it is food deprivation what triggers this cascade of events; however, the same authors also acknowledge that AN patients could also display elevated dopamine levels before developing the ED [3]. Our findings, pointing to a genetic background that translates into higher dopamine activity in individuals with more marked pathological traits, seem to support this last hypothesis. This higher dopamine activity would be a consequence of the presence of the Gly9 variant, which is a gain-of-function allele with almost fivefold more affinity for endogenous dopamine than the Ser9 allele [12]. This enhanced affinity could, therefore, impair reward-risk assessment in the mesolimbic system and contribute to development of pathological traits in carriers of the homozygous genotype [30]. Also interestingly, D3 receptors have been shown to be widely expressed in these mesolimbic brain areas, which are central to the reward process of addictive behaviors [39].
As we mentioned before, there are no other studies evaluating the association of DRD3 Ser9Gly with personality dimensions in ED patients. However, other authors have also reported how allelic variants also increasing dopamine signaling can be related to these psychopathological features. For instance, Frieling et al. observed the COMT 158Met variant (significantly decreasing dopamine degradation) was associated with higher scores in practically the same EDI-2 scales for which we have observed significant results, including bulimia, ineffectiveness, interoceptive awareness and maturity fears [40]. In the same manner, the scores on ineffectiveness, which assesses feelings of inadequacy, insecurity and worthlessness, have been shown to correlate with a polymorphism in the DRD2 gene. The authors of this study argued, in line with the aforementioned hypothesis, that this association may represent the initial stimulus to take up dieting behavior, which could progress to an ED should other psychopathological characteristics be present [41]. With regard to the bulimia dimension, heavily affected by the Gly9Gly genotype in our study, several lines of evidence support the importance of dopamine in bulimic symptomatology [4]; indeed, polymorphisms in dopaminergic genes have also been shown to contribute to variations in the presentation of these bulimic symptoms [42]. Finally, there are also studies reporting how interoceptive awareness, which measures the ability to discriminate between sensations and feelings, e.g. hunger vs. satiety, and that we also observed to be altered by the same genotype, is related to impairments in dopaminergic pathways [43]. However, we would like to remark that sometimes the link between genetic variability and behaviors or personality traits in psychiatric disorders is based on results of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) [44]. These associations need to be formalized into hypotheses and these tested in ad hoc patients’ cohorts. Moreover, GWAS and genetic association studies, in general, focus on diseases and adverse behaviors, while omitting the study of associations with beneficial behaviors [45], which could also be important to understand the mechanisms underlying psychiatric disorders.
With regard to the other two polymorphisms studied, the DAT1 9R/9R, genotype showed a marginal effect on the psychometric evaluation of the ED patients, mainly affecting the asceticism scale, a finding we had reported previously in a very limited AN population (n = 78). However, in that initial study [46], a significant effect on maturity fears and body dissatisfaction was also observed that could not be confirmed herein. Our gene–gene interaction results also show that the impact of the DAT1 10R/9R SNP seems to be more relevant when in combination with the DRD3 Ser9Gly polymorphism. Interestingly, Hersrud et al. have also shown a significant interaction of the DAT1 10R/9R SNP with the COMT Val158Met SNP to aggravate eating-related psychopathology, again pointing to an increase of dopaminergic activity as the mechanism underlying the association [47]. Finally, the DRD2 A1/A1 genotype was found to significantly affect perfectionism. In the same line, Nisoli et al. [41] reported that the A1 allele correlated with scales of the EDI-2 inventory (although not perfectionism). It should be remarked, however, that this study included obese subjects along with AN and BN patients. Moreover, the number of women with AN was comparatively very low (n = 28), which makes their results hard to compare with those of the present work.
With regard to the epistasis analyses, we showed that the Ser9Gly SNP had a more profound effect on some of the scales when combined with the DAT1 10R/9R or DRD2 A2/A1 polymorphism, as revealed by the p values obtained from likelihood ratio test comparing the two-SNP additive likelihood to the best of the single-SNP models. This finding is not unprecedented, for instance, Loch et al. reported that the Ser9Gly SNP could interact with the widely studied COMT Val158Met to modify cognitive performance on schizophrenia patients [48]. Moreover, there are also reports of clinically significant interactions of the Ser9Gly SNP with a Val66Met mutation in the BDNF gene in relation to suicidal behavior in schizophrenia patients [32] or in association with bipolar and anxiety disorders [49, 50]. Both the DRD3 Ser9Gly and DAT1 10R/9R SNPs are believed to lead to increased dopamine signaling (because of increased affinity for the receptor and decreased reuptake, respectively), which would explain why their interaction is able to aggravate the bulimia symptomatology more than either of the SNPs separately. The rationale for the findings regarding the other significant interaction observed (DRD3 Ser9Gly–DRD2 A2/A1) is similar. The DRD2 A1 variant has been associated with increased activity of a decarboxylase enzyme that is key for dopamine synthesis, as well as decreased autoreceptor function, i.e. less inhibition of dopamine release [11]. Therefore, carriers of the A1 allele would presumably have an elevated dopaminergic activity that, together with the increased affinity conferred by the Gly9 variant, would result in elevated dopaminergic signaling, able to impair the reward systems in these AN patients.
A limitation of the study was its relatively low sample size in the case of the BN or, especially, BED populations. No relevant genetic associations were found for these groups, but we should not underestimate the influence of dopamine genetics on these disorders until larger cohorts are analyzed. On the other hand, all the patients were from the same geographical area and were diagnosed and followed-up at the same facility by the same clinicians, which reduced the chance that the findings may be due to population structure. Finally, we did not consider the different psychopathological scales to correct for multiple testing, as we did with the 3 SNPs assayed, as this procedure has been suggested to be too stringent to detect a moderate correlation with different endophenotypes in similar studies [51].
Our results, taken together, indicate that, while there were no differences between AN, BN and BED patients with regard to the distribution of the different genotypes, women with AN who carried the Gly9Gly genotype in the dopamine D3 receptor had significantly worse symptomatology than those with other genotypes. The fact that this is a gain-of-function variant suggests that increased mesolimbic dopamine activity, an area where the D3 receptor is extensively expressed, impairs the dopamine-mediated reward system, thus precipitating psychopathological features of this disorder. Notwithstanding, further studies evaluating larger cohorts and possibly more genes involved in these pathways are warranted to confirm the results presented herein.
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Hinney A, Volckmar AL (2013) Genetics of eating disorders. Curr Psychiatry Rep 15:423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-013-0423-y
Kontis D, Theochari E (2012) Dopamine in anorexia nervosa: a systematic review. Behav Pharmacol 23:496–515. https://doi.org/10.1097/FBP.0b013e328357e115
Sodersten P, Bergh C, Leon M, Zandian M (2016) Dopamine and anorexia nervosa. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 60:26–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.11.003
Broft AI, Berner LA, Martinez D, Walsh BT (2011) Bulimia nervosa and evidence for striatal dopamine dysregulation: a conceptual review. Physiol Behav 104:122–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.04.028
Bello NT, Hajnal A (2010) Dopamine and binge eating behaviors. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 97:25–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbb.2010.04.016
Gervasini G, Gonzalez LM, Mota-Zamorano S, Gamero-Villarroel C, Carrillo JA, Flores I, Garcia-Herraiz A (2018) Association of COMT Val158Met polymorphism with psychopathological symptoms in patients with eating disorders. Curr Mol Med 18:65–70. https://doi.org/10.2174/1566524018666180608090512
Collantoni E, Solmi M, Gallicchio D, Santonastaso P, Meneguzzo P, Carvalho AF, Stubbs B, Clementi M, Pinato C, Forzan M, Cassina M, Fontana F, Piva I, Siani R, Salvo P, Tenconi E, Veronese N, Correll CU, Favaro A (2017) Catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) Val158Met polymorphism and eating disorders: data from a new biobank and meta-analysis of previously published studies. Eur Eat Disord Rev 25:524–532. https://doi.org/10.1002/erv.2555
Gervasini G, Gonzalez LM, Gamero-Villarroel C, Mota-Zamorano S, Carrillo JA, Flores I, Garcia-Herraiz A (2018) Effect of dopamine receptor D4 (DRD4) haplotypes on general psychopathology in patients with eating disorders. Gene. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2018.02.035
Bachner-Melman R, Lerer E, Zohar AH, Kremer I, Elizur Y, Nemanov L, Golan M, Blank S, Gritsenko I, Ebstein RP (2007) Anorexia nervosa, perfectionism, and dopamine D4 receptor (DRD4). Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 144B:748–756
Heinz A, Goldman D, Jones DW, Palmour R, Hommer D, Gorey JG, Lee KS, Linnoila M, Weinberger DR (2000) Genotype influences in vivo dopamine transporter availability in human striatum. Neuropsychopharmacology 22:133–139
Laakso A, Pohjalainen T, Bergman J, Kajander J, Haaparanta M, Solin O, Syvalahti E, Hietala J (2005) The A1 allele of the human D2 dopamine receptor gene is associated with increased activity of striatal l-amino acid decarboxylase in healthy subjects. Pharmacogenet Genomics 15:387–391
Jeanneteau F, Funalot B, Jankovic J, Deng H, Lagarde JP, Lucotte G, Sokoloff P (2006) A functional variant of the dopamine D3 receptor is associated with risk and age-at-onset of essential tremor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:10753–10758
Gamero-Villarroel C, Gonzalez LM, Gordillo I, Carrillo JA, Garcia-Herraiz A, Flores I, Rodriguez-Lopez R, Gervasini G (2015) Impact of NEGR1 genetic variability on psychological traits of patients with eating disorders. Pharmacogenomics J 15:278–283. https://doi.org/10.1038/tpj.2014.53
Gamero-Villarroel C, Gonzalez LM, Rodriguez-Lopez R, Albuquerque D, Carrillo JA, Garcia-Herraiz A, Flores I, Gervasini G (2017) Influence of TFAP2B and KCTD15 genetic variability on personality dimensions in anorexia and bulimia nervosa. Brain Behav 7:e00784. https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.784
Gamero-Villarroel C, Gordillo I, Carrillo JA, Garcia-Herraiz A, Flores I, Jimenez M, Monge M, Rodriguez-Lopez R, Gervasini G (2014) BDNF genetic variability modulates psychopathological symptoms in patients with eating disorders. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 23:669–679. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-013-0495-6
Gamero-Villarroel C, Rodriguez-Lopez R, Jimenez M, Carrillo JA, Garcia-Herraiz A, Albuquerque D, Flores I, Gervasini G (2015) Melanocortin-4 receptor gene variants are not associated with binge-eating behavior in nonobese patients with eating disorders. Psychiatr Genet 25:35–38. https://doi.org/10.1097/YPG.0000000000000065
Gervasini G, Gamero-Villarroel C (2015) Discussing the putative role of obesity-associated genes in the etiopathogenesis of eating disorders. Pharmacogenomics 16:1287–1305. https://doi.org/10.2217/pgs.15.77
Gervasini G, Gordillo I, Garcia-Herraiz A, Flores I, Jimenez M, Monge M, Carrillo JA (2012) Polymorphisms in serotonergic genes and psychopathological traits in eating disorders. J Clin Psychopharmacol 32:426–428. https://doi.org/10.1097/JCP.0b013e3182539f2b
Garner D (1991) Eating disorder inventory-2: professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa
Guimera E, Torrubia R (1987) Adaptación española del “Eating Disorder Inventory Inventory” (EDI) en una muestra de pacientes anoréxicas. Anal Psiquiatr 3:185–190
Derogaitis LR (1977) SCL-90-R: administration, scoring and procedures manual. Clinical Psychometrics Research, Baltimore
Derogaitis (2002) SCL-90R: cuestinario de 90 síntomas. TEA Ediciones, Madrid
Rytila-Manninen M, Frojd S, Haravuori H, Lindberg N, Marttunen M, Kettunen K, Therman S (2016) Psychometric properties of the Symptom Checklist-90 in adolescent psychiatric inpatients and age- and gender-matched community youth. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health 10:23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-016-0111-x
Dsouza U, Craig I (2008) Functional genetic polymorphisms in serotonin and dopamine gene systems and their significance in behavioural disorders. Prog Brain Res 172:73–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0079-6123(08)00904-7
Gonzalez JR, Armengol L, Sole X, Guino E, Mercader JM, Estivill X, Moreno V (2007) SNPassoc: an R package to perform whole genome association studies. Bioinformatics 23:644–645. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btm025
Miotto P, Pollini B, Restaneo A, Favaretto G, Sisti D, Rocchi MB, Preti A (2010) Symptoms of psychosis in anorexia and bulimia nervosa. Psychiatry Res 175:237–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2009.03.011
Martinussen M, Friborg O, Schmierer P, Kaiser S, Overgard KT, Neunhoeffer AL, Martinsen EW, Rosenvinge JH (2017) The comorbidity of personality disorders in eating disorders: a meta-analysis. Eat Weight Disord 22:201–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-016-0345-x
Gazzillo F, Lingiardi V, Peloso A, Giordani S, Vesco S, Zanna V, Filippucci L, Vicari S (2013) Personality subtypes in adolescents with anorexia nervosa. Compr Psychiatry 54:702–712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2013.03.006
Berkman ND, Lohr KN, Bulik CM (2007) Outcomes of eating disorders: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Eat Disord 40:293–309. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.20369
Krishnamoorthy S, Rajan R, Banerjee M, Kumar H, Sarma G, Krishnan S, Sarma S, Kishore A (2016) Dopamine D3 receptor Ser9Gly variant is associated with impulse control disorders in Parkinson’s disease patients. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 30:13–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parkreldis.2016.06.005
Zhi Y, Yuan Y, Si Q, Wang M, Shen Y, Wang L, Zhang H, Zhang K (2019) The association between DRD3 Ser9Gly polymorphism and depression severity in Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsons Dis 2019:1642087. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/1642087
Zai CC, Manchia M, Sonderby IE, Yilmaz Z, De Luca V, Tiwari AK, Squassina A, Zai GC, Shaikh SA, Strauss J, King N, Le Foll B, Kaplan AS, Finseth PI, Vaaler AE, Djurovic S, Andreassen OA, Vincent JB, Kennedy JL (2015) Investigation of the genetic interaction between BDNF and DRD3 genes in suicidical behaviour in psychiatric disorders. World J Biol Psychiatry 16:171–179. https://doi.org/10.3109/15622975.2014.953011
Huang W, Payne TJ, Ma JZ, Li MD (2008) A functional polymorphism, rs6280, in DRD3 is significantly associated with nicotine dependence in European–American smokers. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 147B:1109–1115. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.b.30731
Kang SG, Lee BH, Lee JS, Chai YG, Ko KP, Lee HJ, Han DM, Ji H, Jang GH, Shin HE (2014) DRD3 gene rs6280 polymorphism may be associated with alcohol dependence overall and with Lesch type I alcohol dependence in Koreans. Neuropsychobiology 69:140–146. https://doi.org/10.1159/000358062
Lin CI, Lee SY, Chang YH, Wu JY, Wu YS, Wu PL, Chen HC, Chen SL, Lee IH, Yeh TL, Yang YK, Ko HC, Lu RB (2010) Temperamentsxgenes in bipolar I and bipolar II disorder patients. Psychiatry Res 177:364–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2010.03.005
Joyce PR, Rogers GR, Miller AL, Mulder RT, Luty SE, Kennedy MA (2003) Polymorphisms of DRD4 and DRD3 and risk of avoidant and obsessive personality traits and disorders. Psychiatry Res 119:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-1781(03)00124-0
O’Hara CB, Campbell IC, Schmidt U (2015) A reward-centred model of anorexia nervosa: a focussed narrative review of the neurological and psychophysiological literature. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 52:131–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.02.012
Zink CF, Weinberger DR (2010) Cracking the moody brain: the rewards of self starvation. Nat Med 16:1382–1383. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm1210-1382
Black KJ, Hershey T, Koller JM, Videen TO, Mintun MA, Price JL, Perlmutter JS (2002) A possible substrate for dopamine-related changes in mood and behavior: prefrontal and limbic effects of a D3-preferring dopamine agonist. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:17113–17118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.012260599
Frieling H, Romer KD, Wilhelm J, Hillemacher T, Kornhuber J, de Zwaan M, Jacoby GE, Bleich S (2006) Association of catecholamine-O-methyltransferase and 5-HTTLPR genotype with eating disorder-related behavior and attitudes in females with eating disorders. Psychiatr Genet 16:205–208
Nisoli E, Brunani A, Borgomainerio E, Tonello C, Dioni L, Briscini L, Redaelli G, Molinari E, Cavagnini F, Carruba MO (2007) D2 dopamine receptor (DRD2) gene Taq1A polymorphism and the eating-related psychological traits in eating disorders (anorexia nervosa and bulimia) and obesity. Eat Weight Disord 12:91–96
Groleau P, Steiger H, Joober R, Bruce KR, Israel M, Badawi G, Zeramdini N, Sycz L (2012) Dopamine-system genes, childhood abuse, and clinical manifestations in women with Bulimia-Spectrum Disorders. J Psychiatr Res 46:1139–1145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2012.05.018
Volkow ND, Wang GJ, Fowler JS, Tomasi D, Baler R (2012) Food and drug reward: overlapping circuits in human obesity and addiction. Curr Top Behav Neurosci 11:1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/7854_2011_169
Boraska V, Davis OS, Cherkas LF, Helder SG, Harris J, Krug I, Liao TP, Treasure J, Ntalla I, Karhunen L, Keski-Rahkonen A, Christakopoulou D, Raevuori A, Shin SY, Dedoussis GV, Kaprio J, Soranzo N, Spector TD, Collier DA, Zeggini E (2012) Genome-wide association analysis of eating disorder-related symptoms, behaviors, and personality traits. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 159B:803–811. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.b.32087
Flack K, Pankey C, Ufholz K, Johnson L, Roemmich JN (2019) Genetic variations in the dopamine reward system influence exercise reinforcement and tolerance for exercise intensity. Behav Brain Res 375:112148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2019.112148
Gervasini G, Gordillo I, Garcia-Herraiz A, Flores I, Jimenez M, Monge M, Carrillo JA (2013) Influence of dopamine polymorphisms on the risk for anorexia nervosa and associated psychopathological features. J Clin Psychopharmacol. https://doi.org/10.1097/JCP.0b013e3182970469
Hersrud SL, Stoltenberg SF (2009) Epistatic interaction between COMT and DAT1 genes on eating behavior: a pilot study. Eat Behav 10:131–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eatbeh.2009.01.003
Loch AA, van de Bilt MT, Bio DS, Prado CM, de Sousa RT, Valiengo LL, Moreno RA, Zanetti MV, Gattaz WF (2015) Epistasis between COMT Val158Met and DRD3 Ser9Gly polymorphisms and cognitive function in schizophrenia: genetic influence on dopamine transmission. Braz J Psychiatry 37:235–241. https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-4446-2014-1553
Chang YH, Lee SY, Chen SL, Tzeng NS, Wang TY, Lee IH, Chen PS, Huang SY, Yang YK, Ko HC, Lu RB (2013) Genetic variants of the BDNF and DRD3 genes in bipolar disorder comorbid with anxiety disorder. J Affect Disord 151:967–972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2013.08.017
Lee SY, Chen SL, Chen SH, Chu CH, Chang YH, Lin SH, Huang SY, Tzeng NS, Kuo PH, Lee IH, Yeh TL, Yang YK, Lu RB (2012) Interaction of the DRD3 and BDNF gene variants in subtyped bipolar disorder. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 39:382–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2012.07.015
Mercader JM, Fernandez-Aranda F, Gratacos M, Ribases M, Badia A, Villarejo C, Solano R, Gonzalez JR, Vallejo J, Estivill X (2007) Blood levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor correlate with several psychopathological symptoms in anorexia nervosa patients. Neuropsychobiology 56:185–190. https://doi.org/10.1159/000120623
Acknowledgements
This work has been supported in part by Grant GR18007 from Junta de Extremadura, Mérida (Spain) and Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER) “Una manera de hacer Europa” and a grant from the Alicia Koplowitz Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Author GG designed and carried out the study conception. Material preparation was performed by EL-N, data collection was performed by SM-Z and AG-H, data analysis was performed by LMG. The first draft of the manuscript was written by LMG. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee (include name of committee + reference number) and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This article is part of topical collection on Personality and eating and weight disorders.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
González, L.M., Mota-Zamorano, S., García-Herráiz, A. et al. Genetic variants in dopamine pathways affect personality dimensions displayed by patients with eating disorders. Eat Weight Disord 26, 93–101 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-019-00820-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-019-00820-7