Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Dear Editor,
We read the recent article by Refalo et al. [1] and congratulate the authors on their discussion about the influence of resistance training (RT) performed to set failure versus non-failure on muscle hypertrophy. This discussion is relevant to coaches, athletes, and the general population aiming at improving neuromuscular function, health, and aesthetics. However, we would like to raise issues about the sample size, volume load (VL) reported, studies included, and the generalized recommendations of the findings.
Regarding studies included, as stated in Sect. 2.4 of their article [1], it was required that “(…) participants were randomized to experimental groups.” Methodological quality assessment was assessed by the TESTEX scale, which awards one point in randomization criteria for “studies that stipulate the method of randomization” [2]. However, some studies included in the analysis [3,4,5,6] did not clearly describe the methods used to determine the allocation process. Additionally, five studies included in their review [1] were not randomized in a classical fashion, using instead intra-individual randomization designs—where each participant’s leg was allocated to a different intervention group [3,4,5, 7, 8]. Allocating both legs of a subject is characterized as a form of clustering, implying dependence between the analyzed groups that can affect meta-analysis results if not treated accordingly [9]. This treatment was done by the authors in an elegant fashion, but we felt a lack of transparency regarding the design of the papers included in the review. Specifically, the only way to find out which studies had intra- or inter-group designs was to read them one by one, since this particularity was not clearly stated by the authors anywhere in the results description, as would be recommended [10].
In Table 2 of their article [1], the authors reported the sample size of the studies. Unfortunately, there is an error when describing two studies [4, 11]. Due to dropouts, the final sample sizes were 38 [11] and 27 [4], not 41 and 32 individuals, respectively. If these wrong sample sizes were used for the effect size calculations, this error may have influenced the results of the meta-analysis.
The sub-analysis of the possible impact of the VL was conducted on the basis of the VL reported in the articles (see Table 3 of their article [1]). Therefore, contrary to the author’s claim, three [5, 12, 13] of the nine studies included did not report the metric (i.e., VL), but the number of sets and repetitions only. The inclusion of these studies may have impacted on the sub-analysis of VL moderator effect.
In Sect. 4.1.1 of their article [1], the authors claim that the equalization of VL would be unnecessary, and that set volume would have a more potent effect on muscle hypertrophy. Unfortunately, the cited study does not support this general conclusion, since it is a systematic review conducted with young trained individuals only [14]. Otherwise, seven [4,5,6, 8, 11, 13, 15] of the nine studies included in the sub-analysis of VL moderator effect [1] were conducted with untrained individuals, with one study investigating older individuals [11]. Additionally, due to the set volume prescribed being lower than those achieved with practice, the authors state that the effect of VL as moderator variable would be limited. However, the cited study [16] to support this statement was conducted with professional bodybuilders, a population that may be performing a greater VL than untrained individuals. Similarly, the authors also recommended that future research should employ set volumes that reflect current scientific guidelines for best practice [17]; however, the cited study investigated young trained participants only.
Due to the expected differences in muscle hypertrophy responses observed between trained, untrained [18], and also young and older participants [19], we believe that some of the references cited by Refalo et al. [1] do not support the overall statements and conclusions. Therefore, we recommend caution concerning the findings and recommendations of their meta-analysis to generalized populations (e.g., trained, untrained, young, or older individuals). We hope that the authors receive our comments and suggestions from a constructive point of view. They were presented to improve discussions around the theme.
References
Refalo MC, Helms ER, Trexler ET, Hamilton DL, Fyfe JJ. Influence of resistance training proximity-to-failure on skeletal muscle hypertrophy: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2023;53(3):649–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-022-01784-y. (Epub 2022 Nov 5. PMID: 36334240; PMCID: PMC9935748).
Smart NA, Waldron M, Ismail H, Giallauria F, Vigorito C, Cornelissen V, Dieberg G. Validation of a new tool for the assessment of study quality and reporting in exercise training studies: TESTEX. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015;13(1):9–18. https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000020. (PMID: 25734864).
Andersen V, Paulsen G, Stien N, Baarholm M, Seynnes O, Saeterbakken AH. Resistance training with different velocity loss thresholds induce similar changes in strengh and hypertrophy. J Strength Cond Res. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000004067. (Epub ahead of print. PMID: 34100789).
Nóbrega SR, Ugrinowitsch C, Pintanel L, Barcelos C, Libardi CA. Effect of resistance training to muscle failure vs. volitional interruption at high- and low-intensities on muscle mass and strength. J Strength Cond Res. 2018;32(1):162–9. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000001787. (PMID: 29189407).
Lacerda LT, Marra-Lopes RO, Diniz RCR, Lima FV, Rodrigues SA, Martins-Costa HC, Bemben MG, Chagas MH. Is performing repetitions to failure less important than volume for muscle hypertrophy and strength? J Strength Cond Res. 2020;34(5):1237–48. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000003438. (PMID: 31809457).
Martorelli S, Cadore EL, Izquierdo M, Celes R, Martorelli A, Cleto VA, Alvarenga JG, Bottaro M. Strength training with repetitions to failure does not provide additional strength and muscle hypertrophy gains in young women. Eur J Transl Myol. 2017;27(2):6339. https://doi.org/10.4081/ejtm.2017.6339. (PMID:28713535;PMCID:PMC5505097).
Santanielo N, Nóbrega SR, Scarpelli MC, Alvarez IF, Otoboni GB, Pintanel L, Libardi CA. Effect of resistance training to muscle failure vs non-failure on strength, hypertrophy and muscle architecture in trained individuals. Biol Sport. 2020;37(4):333–41. https://doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2020.96317. (Epub 2020 Jul 5. PMID: 33343066; PMCID: PMC7725035).
Lasevicius T, Schoenfeld BJ, Silva-Batista C, Barros TS, Aihara AY, Brendon H, Longo AR, Tricoli V, Peres BA, Teixeira EL. Muscle failure promotes greater muscle hypertrophy in low-load but not in high-load resistance training. J Strength Cond Res. 2022;36(2):346–51. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000003454. (PMID: 31895290).
Cheung MW. A guide to conducting a meta-analysis with non-independent effect sizes. Neuropsychol Rev. 2019;29(4):387–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-019-09415-6. (Epub 2019 Aug 24. PMID: 31446547; PMCID: PMC6892772).
Higgins JP, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, et al. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Wiley; 2019.
Bergamasco JGA, da Silva DG, Bittencourt DF, de Oliveira RM, Júnior JCB, Caruso FR, et al. Low-load resistance training performed to muscle failure or near muscle failure does not promote additional gains on muscle strength, hypertrophy, and functional performance of older adults. J Strength Cond Res. 2022;36(5):1209–15.
Karsten B, Fu YL, Larumbe-Zabala E, Seijo M, Naclerio F. Impact of two high-volume set configuration workouts on resistance training outcomes in recreationally trained men. J Strength Cond Res. 2021;35:S136–43.
Sampson JA, Groeller H. Is repetition failure critical for the development of muscle hypertrophy and strength? Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2016;26(4):375–83.
Baz-Valle E, Fontes-Villalba M, Santos-Concejero J. Total number of sets as a training volume quantification method for muscle hypertrophy: a systematic review. J Strength Cond Res. 2021;35(3):870–8.
Terada K, Kikuchi N, Burt D, Voisin S, Nakazato K. Low-load resistance training to volitional failure induces muscle hypertrophy similar to volume-matched, velocity fatigue. J Strength Cond Res. 2022;36(6):1576–81.
Hackett DA. Training, supplementation, and pharmacological practices of competitive male bodybuilders across training phases. J Strength Cond Res. 2022;36(4):963–70.
Baz-Valle E, Balsalobre-Fernández C, Alix-Fages C, Santos-Concejero J. A systematic review of the effects of different resistance training volumes on muscle hypertrophy. J Hum Kinet. 2022;81:199–210.
Lopez P, Radaelli R, Taaffe DR, Newton RU, Galvão DA, Trajano GS, et al. Resistance training load effects on muscle hypertrophy and strength gain: systematic review and network meta-analysis. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2021;53(6):1206–16.
Kosek DJ, Kim JS, Petrella JK, Cross JM, Bamman MM. Efficacy of 3 days/wk resistance training on myofiber hypertrophy and myogenic mechanisms in young vs. older adults. J Appl Physiol (Bethesda, Md: 1985). 2006;101(2):531–44.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Dr. Michael Roberts (Auburn University, AL, USA) for his assistance with English editing.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Funding
During the period of the study, Pedro A. B. Fonseca was supported by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior – Brasil (CAPES) – Finance Code 001.
Author Contributions
P.A.B.F. and B.N.I. conceived the idea for the letter and conducted the literature search. P.A.B.F. and E.P. checked the statistical analysis. P.A.B.F. and B.N.I. wrote the first draft of the letter, which was later revised by B.N.I. and G.R.M. All authors read and approved the final version of the letter.
Conflict of Interest
Pedro A. B. Fonseca, Bernardo N. Ide, Eric Pascher, and Gustavo R. Mota have no potential conflicts of interest in relation to the content of this letter.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fonseca, P.A.B., Ide, B.N., Pascher, E. et al. Comment on “Influence of Resistance Training Proximity-to-Failure on Skeletal Muscle Hypertrophy: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis”. Sports Med 54, 535–536 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-023-01946-6
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-023-01946-6