Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Dear Editor,
We read with pleasure, the recent meta-analysis by Runacres et al. showing that compared to the general population, athletes have lower all-cause mortality, cardiovascular disease mortality and cancer mortality [1]. The authors made a conclusion that the results refute the argument made by some literature, that vigorous exercises give no additional health benefit and may increase the chance of cardiovascular events, and the relationship between exercise volume and longevity may be ‘J’ shaped. We found that studies included in the meta-analysis took former athletes as a study group and the general population as a reference group, and the mortality outcomes in most of the studies were simply adjusted by age, sex and calendar year due to the lack of data of the general population, while most of the studies proposing a ‘J’ curve cited by the meta-analysis or the included literature, were based on the general population cohort, and the mortality outcomes were adjusted by a number of demographic factors, socioeconomic status (SES), lifestyle factors and some risk factors of chronic diseases [2,3,4,5]. Given these differences, we proposed that it is difficult to refute the ‘J’ curve conclusions by the results of this meta-analysis, and the advantage of intensive exercise may not be extendable to the general population.
In addition to lifestyle factors and some risk factors of chronic diseases discussed by the authors, some other confounding may influence the interpretation of findings. Professional athletes have higher level of physical fitness compared to the general population [6]. They usually spend much of their training in controlled environments and receive nutritional guidance during their sporting careers. Thus, they may be adaptable to intensive exercise and even derive some health benefits from it. Moreover, better SES of some professional athletes may have positive effects on their longevity [7]. Genetic factors have recently proved to have significant effects on longevity and cardiovascular aging [8, 9]. However, only a few studies included in the meta-analysis adjusted the mortality outcomes by SES [6, 10,11,12], and only one study tried to control the genetic confounding by taking the age-matched brothers of the athletes as a reference group [10].
Given these differences between athletes and the general population, future research may deliberate over choosing athletes, especially the professional ones, as experimental participants when exploring the relationship between intensive exercise and longevity. It needs to be cautious to extend any conclusion to the general population. A variety of confounding factors needs to be considered to adjust mortality outcomes. Health records collected by health management institutes of the regional or national level may serve as useful data sources. Data related to demographic factors, SES, lifestyle factors such as smoking, alcohol consumption, family history and risk factors of chronic diseases are usually available in health records. Risk adjustment models with those factors could be built to calculated mortality outcomes. Furthermore, intensive exercise may be associated with morbidities of some musculoskeletal diseases. Thus, health outcomes reflecting the quality of life may be considered when exploring the relationship between exercise volume and health.
In addition, populations in the included studies were all from Europe or North America with no studies from Asia, Africa or other continents. This might hinder the generalizability of the study results as well since there was a lack of evidence in the Asian or African population. This also suggests an evidence gap in these areas or regions. Moreover, according to the Table 1 in the paper in question [1], the average follow-up years varied significantly among the included studies and the studies with shorter follow-up years seemed more likely to have better results (lower standardized mortality ratio), future studies should consider doing stratified meta-analysis by average follow-up years (e.g. > 50 years versus ≤ 50 years).
References
Runacres A, Mackintosh KA, McNarry MA. Health Consequences of an Elite Sporting Career: Long-Term Detriment or Long-Term Gain? A Meta-Analysis of 165,000 Former Athletes. Sports Med (Auckland, NZ). 2021;51(2):289–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-020-01379-5.
Armstrong ME, Green J, Reeves GK, Beral V, Cairns BJ. Frequent physical activity may not reduce vascular disease risk as much as moderate activity: large prospective study of women in the United Kingdom. Circulation. 2015;131(8):721–9. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.114.010296.
Ekelund U, Steene-Johannessen J, Brown WJ, Fagerland MW, Owen N, Powell KE, et al. Does physical activity attenuate, or even eliminate, the detrimental association of sitting time with mortality? A harmonised meta-analysis of data from more than 1 million men and women. Lancet (London, England). 2016;388(10051):1302–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(16)30370-1.
Schnohr P, O’Keefe JH, Marott JL, Lange P, Jensen GB. Dose of jogging and long-term mortality: the Copenhagen City Heart Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65(5):411–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.11.023.
Wen CP, Wai JP, Tsai MK, Yang YC, Cheng TY, Lee MC, et al. Minimum amount of physical activity for reduced mortality and extended life expectancy: a prospective cohort study. Lancet (London, England). 2011;378(9798):1244–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(11)60749-6.
Kettunen JA, Kujala UM, Kaprio J, Bäckmand H, Peltonen M, Eriksson JG, et al. All-cause and disease-specific mortality among male, former elite athletes: an average 50-year follow-up. Br J Sports Med. 2015;49(13):893–7. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2013-093347.
Chetty R, Stepner M, Abraham S, Lin S, Scuderi B, Turner N, et al. The Association Between Income and Life Expectancy in the United States, 2001–2014. JAMA. 2016;315(16):1750–66. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.4226.
Pietri P, Stefanadis C. Cardiovascular Aging and Longevity: JACC State-of-the-Art Review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021;77(2):189–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2020.11.023.
Torres GG, Nygaard M, Caliebe A, Blanché H, Chantalat S, Galan P, et al. Exome-wide association study identifies FN3KRP and PGP as new candidate longevity genes. J Gerontol Ser A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glab023.
Kontro TK, Sarna S, Kaprio J, Kujala UM. Mortality and health-related habits in 900 Finnish former elite athletes and their brothers. Br J Sports Med. 2018;52(2):89–95. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2017-098206.
Sarna S, Sahi T, Koskenvuo M, Kaprio J. Increased life expectancy of world class male athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1993;25(2):237–44.
Mackay DF, Russell ER, Stewart K, MacLean JA, Pell JP, Stewart W. Neurodegenerative Disease Mortality among Former Professional Soccer Players. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(19):1801–8. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1908483.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Funding
Beijing Sport University (grant No.2020068) and China Medical Board (grant No. (2018) 17-278) funded.
Conflict of interest
Huixuan Zhou, Xueyan Han, Ningxin Ding and Xiaotong Dai report no potential conflict of interest.
Ethics approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Availability of data and materials
Not applicable.
Code availability
Not applicable.
Additional information
An author’s reply to this letter is available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-021-01507-9.
This letter refers to the article available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-020-01379-5.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhou, H., Han, X., Ding, N. et al. Comment on “Health Consequences of an Elite Sporting Career: Long‑Term Detriment or Long‑Term Gain? A Meta‑Analysis of 165,000 Former Athletes”. Sports Med 51, 2231–2232 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-021-01506-w
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-021-01506-w