Abstract
Rarely has the introduction of an anesthetic agent or adjunct been as anticipated or needed as that of sugammadex. Residual paralysis after neuromuscular blockade (NMB) occurs frequently and is associated with a range of adverse effects ranging from patient discomfort to respiratory complications and death. Residual neuromuscular block is due to a number of factors that include overdosing of neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs), inadequate monitoring of the effect of NMBAs, and the limitations of anticholinesterses to antagonize neuromuscular block (relatively slow onset of effect and inability to antagonize deep levels of NMB. Sugammadex, a selective relaxant binding agent, will, when dosed appropriately, rapidly and completely reverse the effects of vecuronium and rocuronium, steroidal NMBAs, from any depth of NMB. While this approach has the potential to increase safety in the perioperative use of NMBAs, it also allows clinicians to revise dosing paradigms to improve surgical conditions and, importantly, patient outcome.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Discovery and clinical implementation of new practices is frequently accompanied by fits and starts as the impact of the new practice is fully realized. Neuromuscular blocking agents are not exempted from this concept. One year after the introduction of d-tubocurarine, its use was described in 131 surgical patients [1]. Ten years later, Beecher and Todd described a sixfold increase in mortality with the use of neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) [2]. Since this time, despite having been described as enhancing the development of modern surgical practices [3], NMBAs continue to contribute to postoperative morbidity and mortality [4••, 5••, 6].
Morbidity associated with the use of nondepolarizing NMBAs is associated with failed airway management after inducing neuromuscular blockade, awareness during anesthesia, hemodynamic effects due to histamine release, the autonomic effects of the older NMBAs, allergic reactions, and residual weakness after tracheal extubation (with the associated complications). The likelihood of many of these adverse effects can be lessened by either not overdosing, or decreasing the dose of NMBA administered, except when specifically indicated. Typically, large doses of nondepolarizing NMBAs (2× ED95 or the dose that on average will cause 95% depression of a single “twitch” following nerve stimulation) have been recommended for endotracheal intubation. Use of larger doses shortens onset time to maximal effect and increases the likelihood that conditions for intubation will be optimal [7,8,9,10]. While administration of these larger doses of NMBAs will shorten onset of effect, they also prolong the duration of action the NMBAs and increase the time period before administered of an anticholinesterse to reverse their effect. Historically NMBAs have been redosed intraoperatively to maintain 1–3 responses to train-of-four (TOF) stimulation. With this degree of neuromuscular blockade, patients can physically respond with subtle movements (such as furrowing their eyebrows) if they are inadequately anesthetized and residual neuromuscular block is more likely to be completely antagonized at the conclusion of surgery (although anticholinesterase reversal should ideally be administered at a TOF count of 3–4). The introduction of sugammadex into clinical practice has lessened concerns of residual neuromuscular block and may allow clinicians to “push the envelope” as to dosing of NMBAs. Exploration of the need for increased depths of NMB, required monitoring when maintaining profound neuromuscular block, and some of the risks associated with maintaining profound neuromuscular block will be explored in this chapter.
Role of Neuromuscular Blockade in Surgery
The use of NMBAs is evolving as surgical practice changes. The majority of adult patients receiving a general anesthetic with an endotracheal tube receive a NMBA. NMBAs facilitate intubation, inhibit reflex movement to stimulation in procedures where immobility is essential, and assist in the management of some patients in the intensive care unit. However, for many patients, maintenance of neuromuscular blockade (NMB) is not required for intubation or surgery. While it is neither a standard nor recommended technique in adults, NMBAs are frequently not part of the induction/intubation sequence in children. Endotracheal intubation in adults without NMBAs can be being facilitated with different combinations of sedative hypnotics and opioids [11,12,13] and provide good to excellent intubating conditions. Use of total intravenous anesthetics without NMB is routine in neurosurgical procedures where intraoperative electromyography or monitoring of motor evoked potentials is planned. The routine need to maintain NMB in ambulatory surgery patients has been questioned for several reasons including that the incidence of residual paralysis in this patient population (38%) is higher [14], residual NMB is associated with delayed patient discharge and increased cost [15] and, emergence after a total intravenous anesthetic is rapid and not associated with an increased risk of nausea or vomiting [16].
Appropriate dosing of NMBAs as part of a general anesthetic enables care of increasingly ill patients for more complex surgical procedures. Traditionally, when used to maintain intraoperative neuromuscular blockade, NMBAs should be dosed to maintain 1–3 responses to TOF stimulation. The depth of NMB that is maintained depends on the surgery being performed and the anesthetics being administered, with less NMB required during a volatile anesthetic. Volatile anesthetics potentiate NMBAs and may cause fade in the TOF ratio when administered in high concentrations [17]. The presence of volatile anesthetics also slows neostigmine-facilitated recovery of neuromuscular function [18,19,20]. While NMBAs provide muscle relaxation when administered during a general anesthetic, they are only a single component of an anesthetic and do not provide unconsciousness, analgesia or amnesia. A recent retrospective study of electronic health records [21••] described an incidence of just under 1% of inadequate NMB—defined as patient movement, coughing, bucking, or the surgeon’s request for a deeper level of NMB. This may have been the result of an inadequate depth of anesthesia rather than a reflection on the quality of NMB. Diaphragmatic movement is not abolished unless a patient is profoundly paralyzed with a post-tetanic count (PTC) of 3 or less, which is deeper than the traditionally recommended TOFC of 1–3. Recommendations for maintenance of depth of NMB at 1–3 responses to TOF stimulation have been made so that pharmacologic antagonism with an anticholinesterase is possible at the conclusion of a surgical procedure [22, 23]. Now, however, sugammadex—when dosed appropriately with neuromuscular monitoring—allows rapid and complete recovery of neuromuscular function from any depth of neuromuscular block if a patient has received either vecuronium or rocuronium.
When maintaining greater depths of NMB, the risk of awareness may be increased since profoundly paralyzed patients are unable to initiate any movement and patient movement with lesser degrees of NMB likely reflects an inadequate depth of anesthesia [21••]. Importantly, the bispectral index, which may be used as an indicator of awareness during general anesthesia, declines during neuromuscular blockade in the absence of any anesthetic [24]. Awareness during a general anesthetic is uncommon yet may have serious postoperative consequences; it is estimated that between 20,000 and 40,000 patients in the USA experience awareness each year [25]. Recollections of intraoperative events while paralyzed may be vivid and cause fear and a feeling of helpless causing long-term sequelae.
The physiologic and pharmacologic impact of nondepolarizing NMBAs is far greater than simply competitive blockade at the post-junctional nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAchR). While some NMBAs will cause histamine release, vagolysis or ganglionic blockade, there are AchR throughout the body—accounting for some of the other untoward effects of these compounds, such as suppression of the respiratory drive to breathe and discoordination of muscles required for swallowing and airway protection. Additionally NMBAs interact with pre-synaptic neuronal [26] acetylcholine receptors at the neuromuscular junction to decrease the release of acetylcholine from the motor neuron and exacerbate muscle weakness. All of these factors contribute to inadequate recovery of NM function which delays discharge from the post-anesthesia care unit [15] and decreases a patient’s sense of well-being and satisfaction with their care [27].
The risk of residual NMB has been reported to be as high as 60%. When intermediate-acting NMBAs were initially introduced into clinical practice, the incidence of residual paralysis, defined at that time as a TOFR < 0.7, decreased from approximately 40% with long-acting NMBAs to 5% with the intermediate-acting NMBAs, atracurium, and vecuronium [28, 29]. However, as these agents became more commonly used and the familiarity with their perceived recovery profile grew, the frequency of residual NMB associated with their administration increased [30]. Since the definition of adequate recovery of neuromuscular function is now a TOFR ≥ 0.9, residual paralysis with theses NMBAs is reported to occur far more frequently than when they were first introduced into practice.
Although the routine use of quantitative monitors of neuromuscular function decreases the incidence of residual neuromuscular block [31••, 32], quantitative monitors, or any monitor of depth of neuromuscular block, are not commonly used [33]. Clinical tests of neuromuscular function are inadequate to detect residual neuromuscular block [34] and qualitative “twitch” monitors do not allow clinicians to detect fade unless TOF ratios are less than 0.4 and fade with double-burst stimulation is > 40% [35]. While sugammadex should be able to eliminate residual neuromuscular block in patients who have received either vecuronium or rocuronium, its dosing is dependent on the response to neuromuscular stimulation. Studies of routine clinical practice and residual paralysis since the introduction of sugammadex demonstrate that while the occurrence of residual NMB is decreased, it has not been eliminated [36••, 37, 38]. The possibility of eliminating post-operative residual NMB with appropristely dosed sugammadex, however, creates the opportunity to reassess historical dosing recommendations for nondepolarizing NMBAs.
Trends in Surgery and Neuromuscular Blockade
Since the introduction of sugammadex into practice, there have been recommendations to increase the depth of NMB maintained during microlaryngeal, robotic, and laparoscopic surgery. Immobility of the vocal cords is required during microlaryngeal surgery. In patients receiving a remifentanil/propofol anesthetic profound NMB (post-tetanic count of 1–2) was associate with an easier laryngoscopy and exposure of the vocal cords, decreased movement of the vocal cords, better surgical conditions, less coughing during surgery, and less patient movement during surgery when compared to patients receiving the same anesthetic and a lesser degree of NMB (TOFC 1–2) [39]. Depth of anesthesia was monitored with a bispectral index and one surgeon, blinded to the treatment group, assessed surgical conditions. NMB was maintained with rocuronium and reversed with either sugammadex in the profound NMB group or neostigmine in the TOFC 1–2 group. The muscles of the larynx, relative to the adductor pollicis [40], are resistant to nondepolarizing NMBAs. Therefore, less movement of the vocal cords would be expected during profound NMB, as was found in the study. What was notable, though, was that in spite of this difference, the surgeries in both groups required approximately the same amount of time and complications described as nausea, vomiting, and sore throat were not different between the study groups. Patients in the TOFC 1–2 group reported more severe mouth dryness—likely because of the glycopyrrolate administered to the patients with a lesser degree of NMB.
Work has also been conducted to study the potential advantages of profound NMB for laparoscopic gynecologic or urologic surgery. There are a number of physiologic changes that occur with the increased intra-abdominal pressure required for laparoscopic surgery. Cardiac effects include decreased venous return and left ventricular end-diastolic volume, increased right atrial and pulmonary artery occlusion pressures, increased systemic and pulmonary vascular resistance and arterial pressure. The cause of these effects are multifactorial and include carbon dioxide absorption which may result in hypercapnia and acidosis-induced decreases in myocardial contractility, stimulation of the sympathetic nervous system causing release of catecholamines, and vasopressin resulting in increased SVR and MAP. In addition, compression of venous capacitance vessels results in a decrease in preload and compression of arterial vasculature which increases afterload. The resulting decrease in cardiac index is proportional to intra-abdominal pressure, SVR, and left ventricular contractility, and returns toward baseline 30 min after establishing the pneumoperitoneum. Similarly, changes in respiratory effects are multifactorial. Abdominal insufflation decreases pulmonary compliance, increases peak airway pressure and decreases functional residual capacity. Carbon dioxide absorption can result in respiratory acidosis. While renal function is negatively impacted with decreased glomerular filtration rate, renal plasma flow, and urine output because of increased intra-abdominal pressure, the effects of pneumoperitoneum on splanchnic function are a balance of vascular compression and vasodilation. Finally, carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum results in postoperative incisional, intra-abdominal, and referred shoulder pain—likely because of acidification of the pneumoperitoneum by formation of carbonic acid from carbon dioxide.
Given the physiologic changes that occur with pneumoperitoneum, decreasing the amount of intra-abdominal pressure required for surgery would seem a natural goal and a number of studies [41,42,43,44,45,46] have demonstrated that deep NMB allows for either lower intra-abdominal pressures during laparoscopic surgery or greater intra-abdominal volume during laparoscopic procedures where deep NMB was maintained. The impact of these findings on clinical practice, though, is difficult to determine. In these studies, either the anesthetic administered was not described, patients did not receive any volatile anesthetics or, the treatment group was compared to patients receiving no NMBAs. For example, one study [46] compared surgical conditions during a desflurane anesthetic (6–7%) in which only a single dose of rocuronium was administered with surgical conditions during an anesthetic in which deep NMB (described by the authors as a TOFC < 2), was maintained. The patients in whom NMB had been maintained throughout surgery, or reintroduced for inadequate surgical conditions, had improved operating conditions. However, what the authors described as deep NMB is typical of more moderate NMB. Whether or not these results would still apply when compared to patients who had been maintained with a profound (TOFC = 0) depth of NMB is not known.
Other studies are more circumspect in terms of the actual impact of the changes (decreased intra-abdominal pressure and greater intra-abdominal space) on surgical conditions and patient outcome [47,48,49,50]. In these studies, the volume change was found to be small, was not observed in all patients with deep NMB or, there was no improvement in surgical conditions. As described in a recent review [51], peak inspiratory and intra-abdominal pressures during laparoscopic surgery are not impacted by depth of NMB with atracurium. Consistent with this, there is no difference in surgical conditions whether or not NMB is maintained in patients receiving total intravenous anesthesia with ventilation controlled through a laryngeal mask airway for laparoscopic gynecologic surgery [52].
If there is not a clear difference between a profound depth of NMB in patients undergoing laparoscopic procedures and a moderate depth of NMB in surgical conditions, there are other potential advantages such as a decrease in gas embolization, greater hemodynamic stability, improved renal function, and decreased postoperative pain. Although theoretically, the use of a lower inflation pressure could provide some of these beneficial effects, current evidence does not support the use of lower intra-abdominal pressures for these reasons. Oliguria occurs with low pressures [53] and hemodynamic changes are not lessened when lower pressures are used [54]. Similarly, patient satisfaction is not impacted by the use of lower pressures and pain is effectively managed by multimodal therapy that includes acetazolamide, which inhibits carbonic anhydrase to decrease the formation of carbonic acid from carbon dioxide [55] and not reduced by low pressure pneumoperitoneum [56••].
The disadvantages and risks of postoperative paralysis, which have been previously reviewed [57,58,59,60], cannot be overstated and may negate any potential advantage of routinely maintaining profound NMB. Recently, the negative impact of incomplete recovery of neuromuscular function on reintubations and unplanned ICU admissions was described [61]. Residual NMB occurs frequently [62, 63] and even the addition of sugammadex to the clinical armamentarium has not completely eliminated the risk of its occurrence [36••, 38, 64]. It is possible to have incomplete recovery of neuromuscular function even after the administration of sugammadex. Published studies have examined the return of muscle strength from a specific depth of neuromuscular block. When depth of neuromuscular block is not monitored and large doses of NMBAs are administered to eliminate the possibility of patient movement, the appropriate dose of sugammadex necessary to allow full recovery of muscle strength is uncertain. Inadequate recovery of neuromuscular function is associated with an increased rate of readmission within 30 days—especially in ambulatory surgery [65••]. The results are consistent with those in an earlier retrospective study documenting increased morbidity and mortality in patients who had received larger doses of NMBAs [6, 66].
Whenever a NMBA is administered, depth of paralysis should be monitored. Dosing recommendations for administration of additional NMBA and reversal agents are based on the response to TOF stimulation [67, 68]. In spite of the need to determine the depth of NMB to appropriately dose NMBAs and their reversal agents, monitoring is not routine and even when monitors of NMB are available, they are not commonly used [33]. However, just as vasopressors would not be administered without knowing what the blood pressure is, NMBAs should not be administered unless depth of paralysis is monitored. Although the usefulness of available quantitative monitors is limited in clinical practice (response is dependent on position of the extremity being monitored and acceleromyography can overestimate recovery) [69], their use will guide dosing of NMBAs and reversal agents and decrease the incidence of residual neuromuscular block.
Conclusion
While neuromuscular blocking agents have contributed to the development of modern surgical practices, their impact on patient outcome is incompletely understood. Understanding of their effects on patient function and recovery has improved since the time these compounds were first introduced into clinical practice [1, 2], their use though, is still associated with increases in patient morbidity and mortality. What is adequate recovery of neuromuscular function? Until several years ago, it was considered to be recovery to a TOFR ≥ 0.7. Even with this degree of recovery, though, patients are at increased risk for respiratory complications, prolonged PACU stays and greater dissatisfaction with their course of recovery after surgery. These findings contributed to a revision of the definition of adequate recovery of neuromuscular function after administration of a nondepolarizing NMBA to a TOFR ≥ 0.9. However, even this degree of recovery may not be complete. Kopman demonstrated that in volunteers a TOFR > 0.9 was associated with visual disturbances and other indications of inadequate recovery of muscle strength [34] and Eikermann has demonstrated that stressing neuromuscular function, even after complete recovery of the TOFR, brings out previously unrecognized weakness [70]. Administration of sugammadex does not eliminate the motor dysfunction present at a TOFR ≥ 0.9 [71••].
Until a definition of complete recovery is determined and monitoring of depth of NMB is consistent, dosing of NMBAs to maintain profound levels of neuromuscular blockade—except for brief periods and accepted indications such as endotracheal intubation—is difficult to recommend. Justification of a change in practice, such as maintaining profound levels of NMB intraoperatively, that potentially put patients at risk, will require that large, multicenter studies are done to define effective dosing paradigms and that better quantitative monitors are both available and a routine part of clinical practice.
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: •• Of major importance
Cullen S. The use of curare for the improvement of abdominal muscle relaxation during inhalation anesthesia. Surgery. 1943;14:216.
Beecher HK, Todd DP. A study of the deaths associated with anesthesia and surgery: based on a study of 599, 548 anesthesias in ten institutions 1948-1952, inclusive. Ann Surg. 1954;140:2–35.
Foldes FF, B-HJ MNPG, Foldes FF, McNall PG, Borrego-Hinojosa JM. Succinylcholine: a new approach to muscular relaxation in anesthesiology. N Engl J Med. 1952;247:596–600.
•• Sasaki N, Meyer MJ, Malviya SA, Stanislaus AB, MacDonald T, Doran ME, et al. Effects of neostigmine reversal of nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents on postoperative respiratory outcomes: a prospective study. Anesthesiology. 2014;121:959–68. Administration of excessive or unnecessary doses of neostigmine increased postoperative atelectasis but did not impact postoperative oxygenation.
•• Bronsert MR, Henderson WG, Monk TG, Richman JS, Nguyen JD, Sum-Ping JT, et al. Intermediate-acting nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents and risk of postoperative 30-day morbidity and mortality, and long-term survival. Anesth Analg. 2017;124:1476–1483. In this retrospective study, when neostigmine was not administered to patients who had received NMBAs, risk of respiratory complications was increased.
McLean DJ, Diaz-Gil D, Farhan HN, Ladha KS, Kurth T, Eikermann M. Dose-dependent association between intermediate-acting neuromuscular-blocking agents and postoperative respiratory complications. Anesthesiology. 2015;122:1201–13.
Ginsberg B, Glass PS, Quill T, Shafron D, Ossey KD. Onset and duration of neuromuscular blockade following high-dose vecuronium administration. Anesthesiology. 1989;71:201–5.
Koller ME, Husby P. High-dose vecuronium may be an alternative to suxamethonium for rapid sequence intubation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1993;37:465–8.
McCourt KC, Salmela L, Mirakhur RK, Carroll M, Mäkinen MT, Kansanaho M, et al. Comparison of rocuronium and suxamethonium for use during rapid sequence induction of anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 1998;53:867–71.
Heier T, Caldwell JE. Rapid tracheal intubation with large-dose rocuronium: a probability-based approach. Anesth Analg. 2000;90:175–9.
Goo EK, Lee JS, Koh JC. The optimal exhaled concentration of sevoflurane for intubation without neuromuscular blockade using clinical bolus doses of remifentanil: a randomized controlled trial. Med (United States). 2017;96. Published online 2017 Mar 3. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000006235. PMID 28248887.
Stevens JB, Wheatley L. Tracheal intubation in ambulatory surgery patients: using remifentanil and propofol without muscle relaxants. Anesth Analg. 1998;86:45–9.
Schlaich N, Mertzlufft F, Soltész S, Fuchs-Buder T. Remifentanil and propofol without muscle relaxants or with different doses of rocuronium for tracheal intubation in outpatient anaesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2000;44(6):720–6.
Cammu G, De Witte J, De Veylder J, Byttebier G, Vandeput D, Foubert L, et al. Postoperative residual paralysis in outpatients versus inpatients. Anesth Analg. 2006;102:426–9.
Butterly A, Bittner EA, George E, Sandberg WS, Eikermann M, Schmidt U. Postoperative residual curarization from intermediate-acting neuromuscular blocking agents delays recovery room discharge. Br J Anaesth. 2010;105:304–9.
Eikaas H, Raeder J. Total intravenous anaesthesia techniques for ambulatory surgery. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2009;22(22):725–9.
Kelly R, Lien CA, Savarese JJ, Belmont MR, Hartman GS, Russo JRHC. Depression of neuromuscular function in a patient during desflurane anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 1993;76:868–71.
Morita T, Tsukagoshi H, Sugaya T, Saito S, Sato H, Fujita T. Inadequate antagonism of vecuronium-induced neuromuscular block by neostigmine during sevoflurane or isoflurane anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 1995;80:1175–80.
DeLisle SBD. Impaired neostigmine antagonism of pancuronium during enflurane anaesthesia in man. Br J Anaesth. 1982;54:441–5.
Gill SS, Bevan DR, Donati F. Edrophonium antagonism of atracurium during enflurane anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 1990;64:300–5.
•• Dubovoy T, Shanks AM, Devine S, Kheterpal S. Frequency of inadequate neuromuscular blockade during general anesthesia. J Clin Anesth. 2017;36:16–20. This was a rerospective study of 9 years of surgical cases that documented a 0.29% occurrence of patient movement (such as coughing) and 0.71% of surgeons requesting a deepening of the lvel on neuromuscular blockade—each of which increased over the course of the 9 years. Depth of neuromuscular block was monitored in the majority of patients but the depth of NMB was not reported in this study. Whether these results are the result of increased awareness of the risk of residual paralysis and more cautious dosing of NMBAs, inadequate dosing of anesthetic agents or a change in surgical expectations regarding depth of NMB is unknown.
Magorian TT, Lynam DP, Caldwell JE, Miller RD. Can early administration of neostigmine, in single or repeated doses, alter the course of neuromuscular recovery from a vecuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade? Anesthesiology. 1990;73:410–4.
Bevan JC, Collins L, Fowler C, Kahwaji R, Rosen HD, Smith MF, et al. Early and late reversal of rocuronium and vecuronium with neostigmine in adults and children. Anesth Analg. 1999;89:333–9.
Messner M, Beese U, Romstöck J, Dinkel M, Tschaikowsky K. The bispectral index declines during neuromuscular block in fully awake persons. Anesth Analg. 2003;97:488–91.
Avidan MS, Zhang L, Burnside BA, Finkel KJ, Searleman AC, Selvidge JA, et al. Anesthesia awareness and the bispectral index. N Engl J Med [Internet]. 2008;358:1097–108.
Jonsson M, Gurley D, Dabrowski M, Larsson O, Johnson EC, Eriksson LI. Distinct pharmacologic properties of neuromuscular blocking agents on human neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors: a possible explanation for the train-of-four fade. Anesthesiology. 2006;105:521–33.
Murphy GS, Szokol JW, Avram MJ, Greenberg SB, Shear T, Vender JS, et al. Postoperative residual neuromuscular blockade is associated with impaired clinical recovery. Anesth Analg. 2013;117:133–41.
Berg H, Viby-Mogensen J, Roed J, Mortensen CR, Engbaek J, Skovgaard LT, et al. Residual neuromuscular block is a risk factor for postoperative pulmonary complications a prospective, randomised, and blinded study of postoperative pulmonary complications after atracurium, vecuronium and pancuronium. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1997;41:1095–103.
Bevan DR, Smith CE, Donati F. Postoperative meeting abstracts: a comparison between atracurium, vecuronium, and pancuroniun. Anesthesiology. 1988;69:272–5.
Debaene B, Plaud B, Dilly MP, Donati F. Residual paralysis in the PACU after a single intubating dose of nondepolarizing muscle relaxant with an intermediate duration of action. Anesthesiology. 2003;98:1042–8.
•• Todd MM, Hindman BJ, King BJ. The implementation of quantitative electromyographic neuromuscular monitoring in an academic anesthesia department. Anesth Analg. 2014;119:323–31. In this study of the impact of requiring quantitative monitoring of NMB on reintubation in the PACU, the frequency of patients entering the PACU with a TOFR < 0.9 was decreased and no patients required reintubation once routine monitoring was instituted.
Murphy GS, Szokol JW, Avram MJ, Greenberg SB, Marymont JH, Vender JS, et al. Intraoperative acceleromyography monitoring reduces symptoms of muscle weakness and improves quality of recovery in the early postoperative period. Anesthesiology. 2011;115:946–54.
Naguib M, Kopman AF, Lien CA, Hunter JM, Lopez A, Brull SJ. A survey of current management of neuromuscular block in the United States and Europe. Anesth Analg. 2010;111:110–9.
Kopman AF, Yee PS, Neuman GG. Relationship of the train-of-four fade ratio to clinical signs and symptoms of residual paralysis in awake volunteers. Anesthesiology. 1997;86:765–71.
Fruergaard K, Viby-Mogensen J, Berg H, El-Mahdy AM. Tactile evaluation of the response to double burst stimulation decreases, but does not eliminate, the problem of postoperative residual paralysis. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1998;42:1168–74.
•• Nemes R, Fülesdi B, Pongrácz A, Asztalos L, Szabó-Maák Z, Lengyel S, et al. Impact of reversal strategies on the incidence of postoperative residual paralysis after rocuronium relaxation without neuromuscular monitoring: a partially randomised placebo controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2017;34:609–16. When reversal was based on clinical signs, rather than the results of quantitative monitoring of NMB, administration of pharmacologic reversal more effectively guaranteed complete recovery than neuromuscular function. In the absence of monitoring, though, neither neostigmine nor sugammadex guaranteed the elimination of postoperative residual neuromuscular block.
Milne I, Ong S, Ong JS, Cheung KC, Schauer AA, Buttar SB, et al. The influence of introducing unrestricted access to sugammadex and quantitative neuromuscular monitors on the incidence of residual neuromuscular block at a tertiary teaching hospital. An audit of “real-life.”. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2016;44:784.
Kotake Y, Ochiai R, Suzuki T, Ogawa S, Takagi S, Ozaki M, et al. Reversal with sugammadex in the absence of monitoring did not preclude residual neuromuscular block. Anesth Analg. 2013;117:345–51.
Kim HJ, Lee K, Park WK, Lee BR, Joo HM, Koh YW, et al. Deep neuromuscular block improves the surgical conditions for laryngeal microsurgery. Br J Anaesth. 2015;115:867–72.
Laycock JRD, Donati F, Smith CE, Bevan DR. Potency of atracurium and vecuronium at the diaphragm and the adductor pollicis muscle. Br J Anaesth. 1988;61:286–91.
Martini CH, Boon M, Bevers RF, Aarts LP, Dahan A. Evaluation of surgical conditions during laparoscopic surgery in patients with moderate vs deep neuromuscular block. Br J Anaesth. 2014;112:498–505.
Lindekaer AL, Halvor Springborg H, Istre O. Deep neuromuscular blockade leads to a larger intraabdominal volume during laparoscopy. J Vis Exp 2013;(76). PMID: 23851450.
Staehr-Rye AK, Rasmussen LS, Rosenberg J, Juul P, Lindekaer AL, Riber C, et al. Surgical space conditions during low-pressure laparoscopic cholecystectomy with deep versus moderate neuromuscular blockade: a randomized clinical study. Anesth Analg. 2014;119:1084–92.
Blobner M, Frick CG, Stäuble RB, Feussner H, Schaller SJ, Unterbuchner C, et al. Neuromuscular blockade improves surgical conditions (NISCO). Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech. 2014;29:627–36.
Van Wijk RM, Watts RW, Ledowski T, Trochsler M, Moran JL, Arenas GWN. Deep neuromuscular block reduces intra-abdominal pressure requirements during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective observational study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2015;59:434–40.
Dubois PE, Putz L, Jamart J, Marotta ML, Gourdin M, Donnez O. Deep neuromuscular block improves surgical conditions during laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2014;31:430–6.
Madsen MV, Gätke MR, Springborg HH, Rosenberg J, Lund J, Istre O. Optimising abdominal space with deep neuromuscular blockade in gynaecologic laparoscopy—a randomised, blinded crossover study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2015;59:441–7.
Barrio J, Errando CL, San Miguel G, Salas BI, Raga J, Carrión JL, et al. Effect of depth of neuromuscular blockade on the abdominal space during pneumoperitoneum establishment in laparoscopic surgery. J Clin Anesth. 2016;34:197–203.
Baete S, Vercruysse G, Vander LM, De Vooght P, Van Melkebeek J, Dylst D, et al. The effect of deep versus moderate neuromuscular block on surgical conditions and postoperative respiratory function in bariatric laparoscopic surgery: a randomized, double blind clinical trial. Anesth Analg. 2017;124:1469–75.
Bruintjes MH, Van Helden EV, Braat AE, Dahan A, Scheffer GJ, Van Laarhoven CJ, et al. Deep neuromuscular block to optimize surgical space conditions during laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2017;118:834–42.
Kopman AF, Naguib M. Laparoscopic surgery and muscle relaxants: is deep block helpful? Anesth Analg. 2015;120:51–8.
Chen BZ, Tan L, Zhang L, Shang YC. Is muscle relaxant necessary in patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery with a ProSeal LMA™? J Clin Anesth. 2013;25:32–5.
Nishio S, Takeda H, Yokoyama M. Changes in urinary output during laparoscopic adrenalectomny. BJU Int. 1999;83:944–7.
Ido K, Suzuki T, Kimura K, Taniguchi Y, Kawamoto C, Isoda N, et al. Lower-extremity venous stasis during laparoscopic cholecystectomy as assessed using color Doppler ultrasound. Surg Endosc. 1995;9:310–3.
Woehlck HJ, Otterson M, Yun H, Connolly LA, Eastwood D, Colpaert K. Acetazolamide reduces referred postoperative pain after laparoscopic surgery with carbon dioxide insufflation. Anesthesiology. 2003;99:924–8.
•• Özdemir-van Brunschot DMD, Scheffer GJ, van der Jagt M, Langenhuijsen H, Dahan A, Mulder JEEA, et al. Quality of Recovery After Low-Pressure Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy Facilitated by Deep Neuromuscular Blockade: A Randomized Controlled Study. World J Surg. 2017;41:2950–8. The quality of surgical contitions for donor nephrectomy and recovery were compared during a standard laparoscopy and a low pressure laparoscopy facilitated by deep neuromuscular blockade. Surgical conditions were rated as being better in the standard laparoscopy group and almost 25% of low pressure laparoscopies were converted to standard pressures (> 10 mmHg). Postoperative pain was not reduced in the low pressure group and the quality of recovery was not improved.
Brull SJ, Kopman AF. Current status of neuromuscular reversal and monitoring. Anesthesiology. 2017;126:173–90.
Murphy GS. Neuromuscular monitoring in the perioperative period. Anesth Analg. 2018;126:464–8. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002387.
Plaud B, Debaene B, Donati F, Marty J. Residual paralysis after emergence from anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 2010;112:1013–22.
Murphy GS, Brull SJ. Residual neuromuscular block: lessons unlearned. Part I: definitions, incidence, and adverse physiologic effects of residual neuromuscular block. Anesth Analg. 2010;111:120–8.
Belcher AW, Leung S, Cohen B, Yang D, Mascha EJ, Turan A, et al. Incidence of complications in the post-anesthesia care unit and associated healthcare utilization in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery requiring neuromuscular blockade 2005–2013: a single center study. J Clin Anesth. 2017;43:33–8.
Hayes AH, Mirakhur RK, Breslin DS, Reid JE, McCourt KC. Postoperative residual block after intermediate-acting neuromuscular blocking drugs. Anaesthesia. 2001;56:312–8.
Maybauer DM, Geldner G, Blobner M, Puhringer F, Hofmockel R, Rex C, et al. Incidence and duration of residual paralysis at the end of surgery after multiple administrations of cisatracurium and rocuronium. Anaesthesia. 2007;62:12–7.
Eleveld DJ, Kuizenga K, Proost JH, Wierda JMKH. A temporary decrease in twitch response during reversal of rocuronium-induced muscle relaxation with a small dose of sugammadex. Anesth Analg. 2007;104:582–4.
•• Thevathasan T, Shih SL, Safavi KC, Berger DL, Burns SM, Grabitz SD, et al. Association between intraoperative non-depolarising neuromuscular blocking agent dose and 30-day readmission after abdominal surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2017;119:595–605. Administration of greater doses of NMBAs and neostigmine in the retrospective study were associated with an increased risk of 30-day readmission. The adjusted odds ratio of readmission in ambulatory surgical patients for high vs low-dose NMBAs was 2.61. Administration of larger doses of NMBAs also prolonged hospital stay and costs.
Grosse-Sundrup M, Henneman JP, Sandberg WS, Bateman BT, Uribe JV, Nguyen NT, et al. Intermediate acting non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents and risk of postoperative respiratory complications: prospective propensity score matched cohort study. BMJ. 2012;345:e6329–9. Available from:. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e6329.
Kopman AF, Eikermann M. Antagonism of non-depolarising neuromuscular block: current practice. Anaesthesia. 2009;64:22–30.
Fuchs-Buder T, Meistelman C, Alla F, Grandjean A, Wuthrich Y, Donati F. Antagonism of low degrees of atracurium-induced neuromuscular blockade: dose-effect relationship for neostigmine. Anesthesiology. 2010;112:34–40.
Claudius C, Skovgaard LT, Viby-Mogensen J. Is the performance of acceleromyography improved with preload and normalization?: a comparison with mechanomyography. Anesthesiology. 2009;110:1261–70.
Eikermann M, Gerwig M, Hasselmann C, Fiedler G, Peters J. Impaired neuromuscular transmission after recovery of the train-of-four ratio. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2007;51:226–34.
•• Baumüller E, Schaller SJ, Chiquito Lama Y, Frick CG, Bauhofer T, Eikermann M, et al. Postoperative impairment of motor function at train-of-four ratio ≥ 0.9 cannot be improved by sugammadex (1 mg kg−1). Br J Anaesth. 2015;114:785–93. After recovery to a TOFR ≥ 0.9, patients received either placebo or sugammadex. Grip strength was reduced after emergence from anesthesia when compared to baseline. Administration of neither placebo nor sugammadex returned strength to baseline values or improved the quality of recovery.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
Cynthia A. Lien has received compensation from Merck for service as a consultant.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Neuromuscular Blockade
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lien, C.A. Profound Neuromuscular Blockade: Advantages and Challenges for Patients, Anesthesiologists, and Surgeons. Curr Anesthesiol Rep 8, 161–167 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40140-018-0276-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40140-018-0276-3