Abstract
Purpose of Review
While vestibular schwannomas are benign in nature, their treatment carries risk of facial nerve injury. Facial palsy causes significant physical and psychological morbidity. This article focuses on contemporary recommendations for the management of facial palsy in the setting of vestibular schwannoma.
Recent Findings
Approximately 5–15% of patients experience long-term facial palsy following resection of vestibular schwannoma. Facial reanimation should be considered in patients with facial paralysis without evidence of recovery by 6 months post-operatively. Treatment of facial paralysis aims at restoration of facial symmetry and reduction of functional morbidity through wide range of treatment methods, from static procedures and injectable treatments to nerve transfers and regional or free muscle transfers.
Summary
Facial palsy is a dreaded complication of vestibular schwannoma extirpation. Many treatment options exist, and early referral to a facial nerve specialist should be offered to patients with facial palsy for prompt evaluation and treatment.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Vestibular schwannomas may compress, adhere to, or distort the natural course of the facial nerve. The facial nerve is highly susceptible to injury from tumor compression, leading to Wallerian degeneration and prolonged conduction block[1, 2]. Clinical facial function is preserved when only 10% of functioning motor neurons are active due to collateral sprouting of the remaining motor axons [1]. As such, facial palsy is an uncommon presenting symptom of vestibular schwannoma, occurring in 1.8–2.4% of patients [3, 4]. As the vast majority of patients present with normal facial function, the preservation of the facial nerve is critical to the successful treatment of this benign pathology.
In surgical resection of vestibular schwannoma, the facial nerve may have already sustained significant damage and minimal additional insult by means of compression and stretch, or thermal injury may result in significant loss of facial function despite an anatomically intact facial nerve. While neuropraxia or axonotmesis resulting from trauma to the nerve is expected to recover at least partially, severe injury and neurotmesis (complete transection) carry high morbidity [5].
Management of Vestibular Schwannoma
The management of vestibular schwannomas has evolved over time due to the growing awareness of the reduction of quality of life and functional deficits from facial palsy [6]. The goals of treatment have shifted from radical resection to more conservative methods with prioritization of functional preservation of the facial nerve. While current practices vary considerably, treatment strategies include observation, stereotactic radiosurgery, and microsurgery.
Observation with interval imaging for growth monitoring is often elected for small tumors in asymptomatic patients [7]. Growth patterns of vestibular schwannomas are variable [7, 8], but up to 45% of observed tumors ultimately receive treatment [8, 9]. The use of conservative strategies with intervention limited to those with progression of growth or symptoms has not increased the incidence of facial palsy [9]. Observation in large or rapidly growing tumors is not recommended [7, 10] as continued tumor compression may cause further deterioration of nerve function.
The use of stereotactic radiosurgery has increased with wider availability but remains highly dependent on the practices of the treatment facility. Long-term facial nerve preservation is seen in greater than 90–95% of patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery [11, 12] but carries risk of trigeminal paresthesia in 10–20% of patients [11]. In young patients, stereotactic radiosurgery is less frequently utilized due to risk of long-term tumor regrowth, hearing loss, and other cranial nerve deficits.
In studies including all size tumors, post-operative rates of significant facial palsy (HB III–VI) and facial paralysis (HB V–VI) are 11–44% and 1–14%, respectively, which decreases to 5–17% and 0.5–2.4%, respectively, by 1 year. Ultimately, long-term HB I–II function is achieved in 86–95% of patients [3, 13,14,15]. In studies including only large tumors (> 2.5 cm), post-operative rates of significant facial palsy (HB III–VI) and complete paralysis (HB V–VI) are 36–64% and 12–17%, respectively, and decrease to 11–22% and 0.3–4%, respectively, by 1 year. In large tumors, 78–88% of patients ultimately achieved HB I–II function [16, 17•, 18, 19].
The decision to operate depends upon many factors including baseline hearing, tumor size, patient anatomy, and availability of experienced surgical teams [20]. While larger tumors are almost exclusively treated with surgical management, patients with smaller tumors may be surgical candidates. Patients and clinicians must weigh the risk of facial nerve injury, possible hearing loss, and surgical complications with the desire for a chance at total eradication.
Potential Preoperative Risk Factors for Facial Nerve Injury from Vestibular Schwannoma Resection
Age
While age is an important factor in treatment selection, no association between increased age and worse facial nerve outcomes has been demonstrated [21,22,23,24,25]. As increasing age is associated with poor tolerance of long periods of anesthesia, older patients, particularly those with smaller tumors, are more likely to be treated with observation or stereotactic radiosurgery [8, 20]. In those with large tumors, incomplete tumor resection is more frequently utilized to decrease surgical duration [20, 26,27,28], which in turn has resulted in better facial nerve outcomes in these patients[29].
Tumor Size
Many reports correlate increasing tumor size with poor facial outcomes [3, 14, 16, 17•, 29,30,31]. A systematic review revealed that 90% of 2890 tumors < 2 cm demonstrated HB I–II function compared to 67% of 6557 tumors > 2 cm. [31]. Incomplete resection has been used to mitigate risk in the setting of large tumors. Numerous studies have shown merit for near-total and subtotal resection with respect to facial nerve outcome with acceptable rates of tumor regrowth and retreatment [27, 28, 32,33,34,35], yet some variability remains [36•]. In gross total resection, recurrence is possible but rare [14, 33, 34]. In incomplete resection, the risk of tumor regrowth is correlated with the amount of unresected tumor [10, 14, 27, 28, 34], and regrowth occurs in 9–33% of patients, although the incidence of regrowth requiring retreatment is lower [3, 14, 28, 29, 32, 33, 35, 37].
The extent of resection continues to be a matter of debate. Inevitably, the use of less than total resection will result in some cases of recurrence requiring further treatment. Similarly, in some cases, the use of total resection will result in facial palsy, for which treatment may be more challenging. As such, neither technique can be universally applied, and the surgeon is faced with balancing these risks on an individual basis [36•, 38].
Surgical Approach
Bloch et al. found no difference between approaches in the treatment of 624 tumors of all sizes at a single institution [21]. Falcioni et al. evaluated 1151 tumors < 1 cm treated over 20 years at their institution and found that the middle cranial fossa approach was associated with worse facial nerve outcomes compared to retrosigmoid or translabyrinthine approaches [30]. On the contrary, Ansari et al. performed a systematic review of the literature including treatment of 850 tumors < 1.5 cm and found the middle cranial fossa had significantly better facial nerve outcomes than other approaches [20]. Ansari et al. found that the retrosigmoid approach was significantly better than the translabyrinthine approach in 1651 patients with tumors > 1.5 cm (although noted that translabyrinthine approach was used predominantly in the largest size tumors) [20], while in a systematic review of 1156 tumors >2.5 cm, Gurgel et al. found no difference between translabyrinthine and retrosigmoid approaches [35]. Ultimately, the choice of approach should be dictated by the tumor anatomy, hearing status, overall patient health, and surgeon experience [38].
Radiographic Characteristics
Anterior tumor extension is associated with worse facial nerve outcomes, presumably due to stretch or displacement of the facial nerve, leading to higher susceptibility to injury relative to tumors with posterior extension [5, 17•, 24, 39, 40]. Wong et al. reported that tumors extending > 1.5 cm anterior to the internal auditory canal are three times more likely to have post-operative HB III or higher [40] and patients are 16% more likely to have a higher post-operative HB grade for every 1-mm increase in the tumor anterior to the internal auditory canal [17•]. The extent of intrameatal tumor and bony changes of the internal acoustic meatus does not correlate with facial nerve outcome [24, 39]. Improvements in diffusion tensor tractography, a novel MRI technique that uses diffusion-weighted imaging data to reconstruct three-dimensional neural tracts, have allowed for the delineation of the facial nerve along the tumor in 80–100% of studied cases [41, 42]. Future use could improve nerve visualization and may ultimately enhance preservation.
Cystic Vestibular Schwannomas
Cystic vestibular schwannomas represent 12–50% of all vestibular schwannomas [43]. These tumors are unpredictable and may undergo rapid expansion of cystic components [43, 44]. Cystic vestibular schwannomas are frequently larger than solid tumors at presentation [45, 46], and surgical excision is the standard therapeutic approach [43, 44]. A meta-analysis including 821 cystic and 2253 solid vestibular schwannomas demonstrated that cystic tumors were associated with a higher rate of facial palsy and lower rate of anatomic preservation of the facial nerve than solid tumors [43]. Particular caution should be applied in tumors with thin cystic walls, large extrameatal diameter, and cystic structures along the medial or anterior aspect of the tumor [44]. Success is related to surgeon familiarity with cystic tumors and use of subtotal resection when necessary [44].
Surgeon and Institution Experience
Complications rates, including facial nerve injury, decrease as volume of vestibular schwannoma treatment increases at a single institution [47, 48]. Surgical learning curves reveal higher rates of facial palsy occurring in the first 50–56 operations, with gradual improvement and stabilization of outcomes with additional experience as surgeons and their teams acquire sufficient experience to maintain optimal rates of preservation of facial function [49, 50].
Intraoperative Considerations
Intraoperative Neuromonitoring
Intraoperative facial nerve monitoring was developed to provide real-time feedback through continuous electromyography monitoring, typically of the orbicularis oculi and oris muscles. Auditory feedback occurs when distal compound action motor potentials are detected when the facial nerve is inadvertently irritated or directly stimulated.
Various metrics assessing degradation of electric response have been used to predict facial function [32, 51, 52]. In multivariate analysis, patients with electromyographic response of ≥ 100 μV to low-amplitude stimulation (0.05 mA) were eight times more likely to have a good long-term facial nerve outcome [38]. The presence of “A trains,” the electromyographic pattern of prolonged neurotonic discharge, may be related to potential axonal loss and is correlated with poor post-operative and long-term facial nerve dysfunction [53,54,55]. The loss of electromyographic signal in an anatomically intact facial nerve is correlated with immediate post-operative facial palsy; however, recovery is possible as shown by a case series of 11 such patients with HB VI function post-operatively who recovered to HB III or better (64%) by a median time of 9.4 months [56].
No single metric can be used as a perfect predictor of final facial nerve outcome. Patients with normal nerve monitoring may develop long-term facial palsy, while others with concerning neuromonitoring findings may ultimately experience good function [38, 56]. Consideration should be given to the use of intraoperative neuromonitoring as a type of warning sign that may guide intraoperative decision-making. Concerning findings such as increased presence of A trains using electromyography or increased thresholds for stimulation of motor-evoked potentials may indicate higher risk of injury, and aborting further tumor excision should be considered [55, 57].
Facial Nerve Injury Identified at Time of Tumor Resection
Facial nerve interruption or transection occurs in 1–5% of resections of any size tumor [14, 30, 56, 58•, 59] and up to 7–14% when including only large (> 3 cm) tumor resections [18, 29, 37, 60]. When the nerve is transected, and the site of injury is clearly visible, immediate repair is indicated. If the two ends of the transected nerve can be re-approximated without tension, end-to-end anastomosis is preferred using two to three 10-0 nylon sutures and fibrin glue [59, 61, 62•, 63••].
When tensionless repair is not possible, cable interpositional graft repair should be performed with harvest of the sural, greater auricular, or medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve. The absence of epineurium in the intracranial segment of the facial nerve makes anastomotic suturing challenging [2, 5, 64•], particularly given the depth of the working field and the background pulsation of cerebrospinal fluid [64•]. A stitch-less fibrin glue technique has been described to facilitate anastomosis, and outcomes are similar to traditional microsuture methods [61, 64•]. Recovery to HB III is seen in 50–68% of patients with cable graft repair, although paucity of details regarding cable graft length and follow-up time renders the interpretation of ultimate facial nerve recovery challenging [30, 64•, 65, 66]. When the nerve is transected in the cerebellopontine angle and the proximal stump cannot be identified at the brainstem, no intervention can be performed immediately. Instead, subsequent surgical reanimation with nerve transfer or other techniques should be discussed with the patient.
Post-operative Considerations
Anatomically Intact Facial Nerve and Post-operative Facial Palsy
The rate of significant post-operative facial palsy (HB III–VI) is highly variable and is reported in 11–44% of patients following vestibular schwannoma resection [3, 13,14,15]. In two large retrospective reviews of patients with an anatomically intact facial nerve and post-operative facial palsy of HB III or IV, recovery to HB I–II was seen in 70–98% and 50–88% of cases, respectively, when followed for a year or more [15, 67•]. While up to 75% of patients with immediate post-operative facial palsy (HB V) and 50% of those with complete facial palsy (HB VI) may improve, full recovery is less likely [15, 58•, 67•, 68••]. The rate of recovery and earlier onset of recovery, particularly in the first 3–6 months, are associated with better final outcomes [14, 67•].
Predicting likelihood of facial nerve recovery is difficult, and timing of facial reanimation intervention has historically been a source of debate. Traditionally, patients were observed for 12 months prior to discussing facial reanimation procedures to avoid intervention in patients who may spontaneously recover [69]. This delayed approach negatively affects those who fail to spontaneously recover and decreases their chance of success after facial reanimation surgery due to prolonged neural and muscular degeneration. Instead, patients should be considered for reanimation surgery in the absence of any detectable recovery by 6 months [67•, 68••].
This recommendation is supported by a recent study by Albathi et al., which demonstrated that occult facial reinnervation is unlikely if no evidence of facial recovery has occurred within 6 months following vestibular schwannoma resection. These patients are unlikely to recover function without surgical intervention. In their cohort of 62 patients with facial paralysis and an intact facial nerve, 35 patients spontaneously recovered, while 27 patients showed no recovery by 6 months. Of these 27 patients, 10 underwent nerve transfer by 12 months, 9 underwent nerve transfer after 12 months, and 8 patients had no intervention. All patients who underwent nerve transfer had no signs of occult reinnervation on direct intraoperative facial nerve stimulation at the time of nerve transfer, and the patients who declined intervention demonstrated HB V or VI at 18 months of follow-up. Earlier reanimation surgery resulted in reduction in the total duration of paralysis, and masseteric nerve transfer resulted in earlier recovery relative to hypoglossal nerve transfer [68••].
Care of Facial Paralysis Post-operatively
When facial palsy is noted immediately post-operatively, thorough physical examination should be performed and documented with close follow-up after the patient is discharged. Photo and video documentation including appearance at rest and with voluntary facial movements should be tracked at baseline and interval follow-up [63••]. Facial palsy exists on a spectrum ranging from flaccid palsy, with complete absence of tone and movement, to nonflaccid palsy, with variable degrees and patterns of hyperkinetic and synkinetic movement. Several clinician-based assessments are used to characterize divergent patterns of facial palsy, including the Sunnybrook [70] and eFACE [71•] grading systems. However, the House–Brackmann (HB) grading system is most commonly reported in neurotology literature [72].
When incomplete eye closure is noted, ocular care should be initiated immediately. Frequent use of daytime eyedrops, nighttime lubricating ointment, and moisture chambers is recommended to prevent corneal irritation and exposure keratopathy. For patients with significant lagophthalmos or symptoms of exposure keratitis, platinum weight placement in the upper lid is recommended and can be performed under local anesthesia [73, 74•]. Patients with a poor Bell’s phenomenon (the upward and outward roll of the globe with voluntary attempt at eye closure), impaired trigeminal nerve sensation, or diminished tear production are at higher risk for exposure keratitis, and expedited weight placement is indicated [74•]. Platinum is preferred over gold due to lower allergenicity and thinner profile [75].
Early referral to a facial reanimation surgeon and multidisciplinary team is recommended for prompt assessment and intervention. Surgical treatment options are dependent upon duration of paralysis (Table 1), but supportive measures can be initiated at any time. Specialized facial nerve physical therapy programs play a critical role in patient education and facial rehabilitation; although, unfortunately, physical therapy maneuvers have not been shown to accelerate recovery. Treatment is aimed towards the reduction of compensatory hyperactivity of the healthy hemiface and reduction of synkinetic movements on the affected side using a combination of biofeedback, neuromuscular retraining, and soft tissue mobilization[63••, 76].
Delayed Facial Palsy
Delayed facial palsy wherein patients with normal facial function immediately post-operatively develop facial nerve weakness in the days to weeks after surgery is reported in 4–26% of patients following vestibular schwannoma extirpation [14, 17•, 26, 77,78,79,80,81,82]. The mean onset of delayed weakness is reported between 10 and 12 days post-operatively [77, 78, 80], although may begin as early as the first post-operative day. Recovery rates are encouraging; the majority of patients return to baseline post-operative facial nerve function [14, 77,78,79,80, 82]. The etiology of delayed facial palsy is thought to be related to vascular spasm or edema [26, 77]. Treatment with steroids are frequently utilized based on Bell’s Palsy Clinical Guidelines [83], although data supporting efficacy specifically for skull base surgery is lacking [77]. Surgical approach may play a role as the use of the retrosigmoid approach is associated with greater rates of delayed facial palsy relative to the translabyrinthine approach, potentially due to the greater length of facial nerve that is decompressed in the translabyrinthine approach, which may mitigate the effect of edema [77].
Surgical Options for Facial Reanimation in Short-Term Facial Palsy (< 2 Years)
Reinnervation of native facial musculature is feasible within 18–24 months from onset; longer periods of facial paralysis lead to chronic denervation and irreversible muscle fibrosis [63••]. Smile restoration and midfacial function can be restored through a trigeminal to facial nerve (V–VII) transfer. The masseteric branch of the trigeminal nerve is favored due to its close proximity to the facial nerve, similar diameter, and minimal donor-site morbidity [63••, 84, 85]. The masseteric nerve is reliably found in the subzygomatic triangle and is coapted to branches of the facial nerve innervating midface and smile (Fig. 1) [68••]. Advantages of the masseteric nerve transfer include low rates of complication, early recovery of facial movement, good resting tone, volitional smile, increased dynamic symmetry, and commissure excursion [63••, 68••, 85,86,87,88,89,90, 91•]. As only one distal facial nerve branch is used for a trigeminal to facial nerve transfer, concurrent recovery through the native facial nerve remains possible. Dual facial reanimation techniques using both cable grafting at the skull base and masseteric nerve transposition have been published in 13 cases and may improve dynamic movement [92, 93]. Careful assessment of masseter function and a thorough cranial nerve exam should be performed upon discussing facial reanimation surgery options with the patient.
Hypoglossal to facial nerve (XII–VII) transfer differs from the masseteric to facial nerve transfer in that the trunk of the facial nerve is typically sacrificed and thus no native spontaneous facial movement will result. Historically, the XII–VII transfer involved greater post-operative morbidity as the entire hypoglossal nerve was sacrificed for coaptation with the facial nerve. While excellent facial tone can be achieved and newer techniques sparing complete hypoglossal transection have been described to reduce tongue morbidity [68••, 94, 95], any injury to the hypoglossal nerve may be complicated atrophy of the ipsilateral tongue resulting in difficulties with speech, mastication, and swallowing [94, 95]. Caution should be used in patients with multiple cranial nerve deficits; diagnosis of neurofibromatosis II is a contraindication for hypoglossal to facial nerve transfer due to a risk of future dysphagia and dysarthria.
Future advances in nerve identification may augment our ability to identify distal nerve branches in facial nerve reanimation procedures. The use of a fluorescent peptide binding probe has been shown to improve intraoperative visualization of chronically denervated (up to 9 months) nerves in a live mouse model [96]. The development of this technology is ongoing in a multidisciplinary clinical trial.
Treatment of Longstanding Facial Palsy
After 18–24 months, reinnervation of native facial musculature with nerve transfer is no longer a viable option due to chronic denervation and muscle fibrosis. Alternative muscle sources such as regional or free muscle transfers should be considered for smile reanimation.
Regional Muscle Transfer
Temporalis muscle transfers are a good option for restoration of a volitional (non-spontaneous) smile in longstanding facial palsy. In the orthodromic approach, the temporalis tendon is elevated off the mandible and a portion of the coronoid process is transected to release the superior attachment of the tendon. The tendon is pulled inferiorly and inset at the modiolus (fusion of lip elevator and depressor muscles lateral to the oral commissure) [97,98,99]. The antidromic approach involves reflecting the middle third of the temporalis muscle either over the zygomatic arch or following resection of the zygoma but may leave a depression in the temporal fossa and a bulge over the zygomatic arch [97]. While temporalis transfer provides support to the midface and oral commissure, volitional smiling is bite-activated and requires facial rehabilitation for optimal outcomes.[97]
Free Muscle Transfer
Gracilis free muscle transfer is widely regarded as the gold standard smile reanimation procedure for longstanding or irreversible facial paralysis[100, 101] and may be employed in patients without major medical comorbidities who can tolerate microvascular surgery. A reliable procedure with low failure rates, the gracilis free muscle transfer will produce a meaningful smile (at least 3 mm of excursion with smile) in 84% of recipients when driven by the contralateral facial nerve via a cross-face nerve graft and 94% of recipients when driven by the ipsilateral trigeminal nerve [100].
A single-stage gracilis free muscle transfer is driven by the ipsilateral masseteric nerve and produces a volitional smile. As with any trigeminal nerve–driven smile reanimation (similar to the 5–7 nerve transfer or temporalis transfer), facial rehabilitation is key to successful smile outcomes [98].
Spontaneous smile reanimation typically involves a two-stage procedure, whereby a donor branch of the contralateral healthy facial nerve is coapted to a cross-face nerve graft (usually sural nerve) without a distal coaptation. After 6–9 months or advancing onset of a Tinel’s sign (elicited by tapping on the distal end of the cross-face nerve graft with a referred sensation to the neurorrhaphy site), the gracilis free muscle transfer surgery can take place wherein the distal nerve graft is coapted to the donor flap. Patients should be informed that the onset of movement may take up to 12–18 months following the second stage and may strengthen over time [102].
Dual innervation using both methods has also been described [100, 103,104,105]; the optimal neural source, number of stages, and coaptation patterns remain a source of debate [84, 105, 106]. In patients with suboptimal esthetic outcomes from midfacial bulk or oral commissure, malposition may be safely addressed in a small revision surgery without endangering the neurovascular pedicle [107].
Management of Upper Facial Paralysis
Brow ptosis can obstruct vision and worsen ocular irritation. Static correction can be performed with a brow lift using a minimally invasive approach in the office under local anesthesia [108, 109]. Of note, a direct brow lift [63••] may be insufficient to bear the facial soft tissue weight in facial paralysis patients, and the power brow technique with suture suspension to a titanium mini-plate is preferred for optimal outcomes [108]. Treatment of lagophthalmos can be achieved by eyelid weight placement or tarsorrhaphy [73, 74•]. Ectropion caused by lower eyelid laxity can be treated with tarsal strip suspension, lateral or medial canthoplasty [74•], or a fascia lata lower eyelid sling [63••].
Management of Midface Paralysis
Due to the weight of the facial soft tissue in facial paralysis, rhinoplasty techniques to correct external nasal valve collapse may be insufficient [63••]. Static suspension of the nasal accessory cartilages within the nasal ala to the true temporalis fascia with fascia lata provides superior relief of nasal obstruction and improves symmetry of the nasolabial fold, supporting the midface and oral commissure [63••, 76, 110•]. Patients with an overprominent nasolabial fold related to hyperkinetic or synkinetic movement can undergo nasolabial fold effacement procedures [76]. Smile reanimation should be addressed through regional or free muscle transfers as detailed above.
Management of Lower Facial Paralysis
Paralysis of the oral depressor muscles leads to an asymmetric smile as well as deficits in oral incompetence, speech, and emotional expression [111]. In flaccid facial paralysis, the lip and oral commissure are typically inferiorly malpositioned, and philtrum skew may occur in response to pull from the healthy hemiface; this can be corrected with either fascia lata or suture static suspension [63••]. In nonflaccid facial paralysis, hyperkinetic contraction of the oral depressors can be disfiguring. Patients with a prior history of satisfactory response to local anesthesia or botulinum injection of the oral depressors may undergo selective myectomy of the affected depressor anguli oris, mentalis, or buccinator muscles for a permanent effect[112].
Injected Chemodenervation
Injected chemodenervation agents such as botulinum toxin represent a valuable component in the management of facial palsy and may be used on either side of the face to balance facial asymmetry [63••, 113, 114•, 115, 116]. Effects are temporary, but injections can be performed routinely in clinic, are well tolerated, and show significant improvement in facial symmetry and quality of life [114•, 116,117,118]. Complications are rare, including ptosis or facial droop, and are related to larger doses. However, symptoms are often mild and self-resolving as the effect of the toxin decreases [113, 118].
In nonflaccid facial paralysis, injection is used for hyperkinetic or overactive movement of facial muscles and synkinesis. Chemodenervation in appropriately targeted synkinetic muscles has been reported to improve facial symmetry and reduce involuntary muscle contractions [113, 114•, 116, 118]. Assessments on subjective morbidity in nonflaccid facial palsy prior to and after botulinum treatment show significant improvement in quality of life, social function, facial comfort, and perception of self-image [118]. The optimal results of facial function can be gained by timing facial rehabilitation training after chemodenervation and should be coordinated with a physical therapy team specialized in facial nerve management.
Conclusion
Conservative treatment approaches to vestibular schwannoma have been developed and accepted in an effort to prioritize preservation of facial nerve function in the management of this benign condition. The rates of post-operative facial palsy are highly variable, but recovery is expected in the majority of patients over the months following surgery. The absence of any detectable improvement in facial paralysis by 6 months is independently predictive of permanent paralysis, and reanimation procedures should be considered [68••]. Early referral to a facial reanimation surgeon is recommended for prompt assessment and intervention, followed by long-term monitoring for the evolution of symptoms and refinement of individualized treatment plans. The management of facial palsy entails physical therapy, injectable treatments, and various surgical reanimation procedures. Treatment is aimed at optimization of facial symmetry and restoration of smile and has been effective in improving esthetic appearance, functional deficits, and quality of life in patients with facial palsy.
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
Axon PR, Ramsden RT. Facial nerve injury caused by vestibular Schwannoma compression: severity and adaptation to maintain normal clinical facial function. Am J Otol. 1999;20:763–9.
Sun MZ, Oh MC, Safaee M, Kaur G, Parsa AT. Neuroanatomical correlation of the House-Brackmann grading system in the microsurgical treatment of vestibular schwannoma. Neurosurg Focus. 2012;33:1–16.
Killeen DE, Barnett SL, Mickey BE, Hunter JB, Isaacson B, Kutz JW. The association of vestibular schwannoma volume with facial nerve outcomes after surgical resection. Laryngoscope. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.29141.
Mooney MA, Hendricks B, Sarris CE, Spetzler RF, Almefty KK, Porter RW. Long-term facial nerve outcomes after microsurgical resection of vestibular schwannomas in patients with preoperative facial nerve palsy. J Neurol Surg, Part B Skull Base. 2018;79:309–13.
Sampath P, Holliday MJ, Brem H, Niparko JK, Long DM. Facial nerve injury in acoustic neuroma (vestibular schwannoma) surgery: etiology and prevention. J Neurosurg. 1997;87:60–6.
Nellis JC, Ishii M, Byrne PJ, Boahene KDO, Dey JK, Ishii LE. Association among facial paralysis, depression, and quality of life in facial plastic surgery patients. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2017;19:190–6. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamafacial.2016.1462.
Suryanarayanan R, Ramsden RT, Saeed SR, Aggarwal R, King AT, Rutherford SA, et al. Vestibular schwannoma: role of conservative management. J Laryngol Otol. 2010;124:251–7.
Lees KA, Tombers NM, Link MJ, Driscoll CL, Neff BA, Van Gompel JJ, et al. Natural history of sporadic vestibular schwannoma: a volumetric study of tumor growth. Otolaryngol - Head Neck Surg (U S). 2018;159:535–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599818770413.
Jia H, Sterkers O, Pavillon-Maisonnier C, Smail M, Nguyen Y, Wu H, et al. Management and outcomes of sporadic vestibular schwannoma: a longitudinal study over 12 years. Laryngoscope. 2020;131:E970–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.28888.
Jeltema HR, Bakker NA, Bijl HP, Wagemakers M, Metzemaekers JDM, Van Dijk JMC. Near total extirpation of vestibular schwannoma with salvage radiosurgery. Laryngoscope. 2015;125:1703–7.
Tsao MN, Sahgal A, Xu W, et al (2017) Stereotactic radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma: International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society (ISRS) practice guideline. J. radiosurgery SBRT
Lerner DK, Lee D, Naples JG, Brant JA, Bigelow D, Alonso-Basanta M, et al. Factors associated with facial nerve paresis following Gamma Knife for vestibular schwannoma. Otol Neurotol. 2020;41:E83–8.
Bhimrao SK, Le TN, Dong CC, Makarenko S, Wongprasartsuk S, Westerberg BD, et al. Role of facial nerve motor-evoked potential ratio in predicting facial nerve function in vestibular schwannoma surgery both immediate and at 1 year. Otol Neurotol. 2016;37:1162–7.
Ahn J, Ryu NG, Lim J, Kang M, Seol HJ, Cho YS. Prognostic factors of facial nerve function after vestibular schwannoma removal via translabyrinthine approach. Acta Otolaryngol. 2019;139:541–6.
Torres R, Nguyen Y, Vanier A, Smail M, Ferrary E, Sterkers O, et al. Multivariate analysis of factors influencing facial nerve outcome following microsurgical resection of vestibular schwannoma. Otolaryngol - Head Neck Surg (U S). 2017;156:525–33.
Sobieski C, Killeen DE, Barnett SL, Mickey BE, Hunter JB, Isaacson B, et al. Facial nerve outcomes after vestibular schwannoma microsurgical resection in neurofibromatosis type 2. Otolaryngol - Head Neck Surg (U S). 2020:019459982095414. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599820954144.
• Grahnke K, Garst JR, Martin B, Leonetti JP, Anderson DE. Prognostic indices for predicting facial nerve outcome following the resection of large acoustic neuromas. J Neurol Surg, Part B Skull Base. 2017;78:454–60 This article discusses the importance of anterior extension of vestibular schwannomas as a prognostic indicator for predicting facial nerve injury during resection of large (> 2.5 cm) tumors.
Huang X, Xu M, Xu J, Zhou L, Zhong P, Chen M, et al. Complications and management of large intracranial vestibular schwannomas via the retrosigmoid approach. World Neurosurg. 2017;99:326–35.
wen Liu S, Jiang W, qiu Zhang H, peng Li X, Yan Wan X, Emmanuel B, et al. Intraoperative neuromonitoring for removal of large vestibular schwannoma: facial nerve outcome and predictive factors. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2015;133:83–9.
Ansari SF, Terry C, Cohen-Gadol AA. Surgery for vestibular schwannomas: a systematic review of complications by approach. Neurosurg Focus. 2012;33:E14. https://doi.org/10.3171/2012.6.FOCUS12163.
Bloch O, Sughrue ME, Kaur R, Kane AJ, Rutkowski MJ, Kaur G, et al. Factors associated with preservation of facial nerve function after surgical resection of vestibular schwannoma. J Neurooncol. 2011;102:281–6.
Kohlberg GD, Lipschitz N, Raghavan AM, Breen JT, Pensak ML, Zuccarello M, et al. Middle cranial fossa approach to vestibular schwannoma resection in the older patient population. Otol Neurotol. 2020;42:e75–81. https://doi.org/10.1097/mao.0000000000002881.
Jiang N, Wang Z, Chen W, Xie Y, Peng Z, Yuan J, et al. Microsurgical outcomes after gross total resection on vestibular schwannoma in elderly patients: a matched cohort study. World Neurosurg. 2017;101:457–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.01.120.
Gerganov VM, Klinge PM, Nouri M, Stieglitz L, Samii M, Samii A. Prognostic clinical and radiological parameters for immediate facial nerve function following vestibular schwannoma surgery. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2009;151:581–7.
Bowers CA, Gurgel RK, Brimley C, Hawryluk GWJ, Taggart M, Braden S, et al. Surgical treatment of vestibular schwannoma: does age matter? World Neurosurg. 2016;96:58–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2016.08.054.
Brackmann DE, Cullen RD, Fisher LM. Facial nerve function after translabyrinthine vestibular schwannoma surgery. Otolaryngol - Head Neck Surg. 2007;136:773–7.
Haque R, Wojtasiewicz TJ, Gigante PR, Attiah MA, Huang B, Isaacson SR, et al. Efficacy of facial nerve-sparing approach in patients with vestibular schwannomas: Clinical article. J Neurosurg. 2011;115:917–23.
Chen Z, Prasad SC, Di Lella F, Medina M, Piccirillo E, Taibah A, et al. The behavior of residual tumors and facial nerve outcomes after incomplete excision of vestibular schwannomas: Clinical article. J Neurosurg. 2014;120:1278–87.
Grinblat G, Dandinarasaiah M, Braverman I, Taibah A, Lisma DG, Sanna M. Large and giant vestibular schwannomas: overall outcomes and the factors influencing facial nerve function. Neurosurg Rev. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-020-01380-6.
Falcioni M, Fois P, Taibah A, Sanna M. Facial nerve function after vestibular schwannoma surgery: Clinical article. J Neurosurg. 2011;115:820–6.
Sughrue ME, Yang I, Rutkowski MJ, Aranda D, Parsa AT. Preservation of facial nerve function after resection of vestibular schwannoma. Br J Neurosurg. 2010;24:666–71.
Bernardeschi D, Pyatigorskaya N, Vanier A, Bielle F, Smail M, Lamas G, et al. Role of electrophysiology in guiding near-total resection for preservation of facial nerve function in the surgical treatment of large vestibular schwannomas. J Neurosurg. 2018;128:903–10.
Schwartz MS, Kari E, Strickland BM, Berliner K, Brackmann DE, House JW, et al. Evaluation of the increased use of partial resection of large vestibular schwannomas: facial nerve outcomes and recurrence/regrowth rates. Otol Neurotol. 2013;34:1456–64.
Monfared A, Corrales CE, Theodosopoulos PV, Blevins NH, Oghalai JS, Selesnick SH, et al. Facial nerve outcome and tumor control rate as a function of degree of resection in treatment of large acoustic neuromas: preliminary report of the acoustic neuroma subtotal resection study (ANSRS). Neurosurgery. 2016;79:194–200.
Gurgel RK, Dogru S, Amdur RL, Monfared A. Facial nerve outcomes after surgery for large vestibular schwannomas: do surgical approach and extent of resection matter? Neurosurg Focus. 2012;33:1–8.
• Starnoni D, Giammattei L, Cossu G, et al. Surgical management for large vestibular schwannomas: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and consensus statement on behalf of the EANS skull base section. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-020-04491-7This article investigates the optimal management of large vestibular schwannomas (> 3cm) and provides support for functional preservation as the main goal of surgery.
Huang X, Xu J, Xu M, Chen M, Ji K, Ren J, et al. Functional outcome and complications after the microsurgical removal of giant vestibular schwannomas via the retrosigmoid approach: a retrospective review of 16-year experience in a single hospital. BMC Neurol. 2017;17:1–9.
Ren Y, MacDonald BV, Tawfik KO, Schwartz MS, Friedman RA. Clinical predictors of facial nerve outcomes after surgical resection of vestibular schwannoma. Otolaryngol - Head Neck Surg (U S). 2020:019459982096138.
Sharma M, Sonig A, Ambekar S, Nanda A. Radiological and clinical factors predicting the facial nerve outcome following retrosigmoid approach for large vestibular schwannomas (VSs). J Neurol Surg, Part B Skull Base. 2013;74:317–23.
Wong RH, Copeland WR, Jacob JT, Sivakanthan S, Van Gompel JJ, Van Loveren H, et al. Anterior extension of tumor is as important as tumor size to facial nerve outcome and extent of resection for vestibular schwannomas. J Neurol Surg, Part B Skull Base. 2017;78:473–80.
Savardekar AR, Patra DP, Thakur JD, Narayan V, Mohammed N, Bollam P, et al. Preoperative diffusion tensor imaging-fiber tracking for facial nerve identification in vestibular schwannoma: a systematic review on its evolution and current status with a pooled data analysis of surgical concordance rates. Neurosurg Focus. 2018;44:E5. https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.12.FOCUS17672.
Li H, Wang L, Hao S, Li D, Wu Z, Zhang L, et al. Identification of the facial nerve in relation to vestibular schwannoma using preoperative diffusion tensor tractography and intraoperative tractography-integrated neuronavigation system. World Neurosurg. 2017;107:669–77.
Wu X, Song G, Wang X, Li M, Chen G, Guo H, et al. Comparison of surgical outcomes in cystic and solid vestibular schwannomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosurg Rev. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-020-01400-5.
Piccirillo E, Wiet MR, Flanagan S, Dispenza F, Giannuzzi A, Mancini F, et al. Cystic vestibular schwannoma: classification, management, and facial nerve outcomes. Otol Neurotol. 2009;30:826–34.
Han JH, Baek KH, Lee YW, Hur YK, Kim HJ, Moon IS. Comparison of clinical characteristics and surgical outcomes of cystic and solid vestibular schwannomas. Otol Neurotol. 2018;39:e381–6.
Yashar P, Zada G, Harris B, Giannotta SL. Extent of resection and early postoperative outcomes following removal of cystic vestibular schwannomas: surgical experience over a decade and review of the literature. Neurosurg Focus. 2012;33:1–6.
Hatch JL, Bauschard MJ, Nguyen SA, Lambert PR, Meyer TA, McRackan TR. National trends in vestibular schwannoma surgery: influence of patient characteristics on outcomes. Otolaryngol - Head Neck Surg (U S). 2018;159:102–9.
Rezaii E, Li D, Heiferman DM, Szujewski CC, Martin B, Cobb A, et al. Effect of institutional volume on acoustic neuroma surgical outcomes: state inpatient database 2009–2013. World Neurosurg. 2019;129:e754–60.
Grey PL, Moffat DA, Palmer CR, Hardy DG, Baguley DM. Factors which influence the facial nerve outcome in vestibular schwannoma surgery. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1996;21:409–13.
Wang AY, Wang JT, Dexter M, Da Cruz M. The vestibular schwannoma surgery learning curve mapped by the cumulative summation test for learning curve. Otol Neurotol. 2013;34:1469–75.
Tawfik KO, Walters ZA, Kohlberg GD, Lipschitz N, Breen JT, O’Neal K, et al. Impact of motor-evoked potential monitoring on facial nerve outcomes after vestibular schwannoma resection. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2019;128:56–61.
Huang X, Ren J, Xu J, Xu M, Chen D, Chen M, et al. The utility of “low current” stimulation threshold of intraoperative electromyography monitoring in predicting facial nerve function outcome after vestibular schwannoma surgery: a prospective cohort study of 103 large tumors. J Neurooncol. 2018;138:383–90.
Frigeni B, Bivona R, Foresti C, Guazzo E, Danesi G. Predictive value of preoperative and intraoperative neurophysiology in evaluating long-term facial function outcome in acoustic neuroma surgery. Otol Neurotol. 2020;41:530–6.
Ren Y, Sethi RKV, Stankovic KM. National trends in surgical resection of vestibular schwannomas. Otolaryngol - Head Neck Surg (U S). 2020;163:1244–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599820932148.
Prell J, Strauss C, Rampp S. 27. Facial nerve palsy after vestibular schwannoma surgery: dynamic risk-stratification based on continuous EMG-monitoring. Clin Neurophysiol. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2013.12.030.
Carlson ML, Van Abel KM, Schmitt WR, Driscoll CL, Neff BA, Link MJ. The anatomically intact but electrically unresponsive facial nerve in vestibular schwannoma surgery. Neurosurgery. 2012;71:1125–30.
Hendriks T, Kunst HPM, Huppelschoten M, Doorduin J, Ter LM. TcMEP threshold change is superior to A-train detection when predicting facial nerve outcome in CPA tumour surgery. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-020-04275-z.
• Pardo-Maza A, Lassaletta L, González-Otero T, Roda JM, Moraleda S, Arbizu Á, et al. Evolution of patients with immediate complete facial paralysis secondary to acoustic neuroma surgery. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2016;125:495–500 This article follows 50 patients with immediate total facial paralysis after vestibular schwannoma surgery and includes management and outcomes in patients with an intact nerve, partial injury and complete transection. In all groups they report the majority (82%) of patients achieved final HB III function.
Moffat DA, Parker RA, Hardy DG, MacFarlane R. Factors affecting final facial nerve outcome following vestibular schwannoma surgery. J Laryngol Otol. 2014;128:406–15.
Zou P, Zhao L, Chen P, Xu H, Liu N, Zhao P, et al. Functional outcome and postoperative complications after the microsurgical removal of large vestibular schwannomas via the retrosigmoid approach: a meta-analysis. Neurosurg Rev. 2014;37:15–21.
Bacciu A, Falcioni M, Pasanisi E, Di Lella F, Lauda L, Flanagan S, et al. Intracranial facial nerve grafting after removal of vestibular schwannoma. Am J Otolaryngol - Head Neck Med Surg. 2009;30:83–8.
• Hohman MH, Hadlock TA. Etiology, diagnosis, and management of facial palsy: 2000 patients at a facial nerve center. Laryngoscope. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.24542This article reviews the management of facial palsy of all etiologies and provides management algorithms for individualization of treatment based on patient presentation.
•• Jowett N, Hadlock TA. A contemporary approach to facial reanimation. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2015;17:293–300 This article discusses the range of surgical and non-surgical methods for treating acute and long-standing facial palsy. The authors provide an overview of options for each facial zone as well as differing techniques for use in flaccid versus non-flaccid facial palsy.
• Prasad SC, Balasubramanian K, Piccirillo E, Taibah A, Russo A, He J, et al. Surgical technique and results of cable graft interpositioning of the facial nerve in lateral skull base surgeries: experience with 213 consecutive cases. J Neurosurg. 2018;128:631–8 This retrospective review investigates cable interpositional grafting after nerve sacrifice in lateral skull base surgery and shows that half of patients achieved HB III function.
Ricciardi L, Stifano V, Pucci R, Stumpo V, Montano N, Della Monaca M, et al. Comparison between VII-to-VII and XII-to-VII coaptation techniques for early facial nerve reanimation after surgical intra-cranial injuries: a systematic review and pooled analysis of the functional outcomes. Neurosurg Rev. 2020;44:153–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-019-01231-z.
Özmen ÖA, Falcioni M, Lauda L, Sanna M. Outcomes of facial nerve grafting in 155 cases: predictive value of history and preoperative function. Otol Neurotol. 2011;32:1341–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0b013e31822e952d.
• Rivas A, Boahene KD, Bravo HC, Tan M, Tamargo RJ, Francis HW. A model for early prediction of facial nerve recovery after vestibular schwannoma surgery. Otol Neurotol. 2011;32:826–33 This article discusses the use of rate of recovery as a predictor of long-term facial nerve function and demonstrates the trend towards improved final function with early and faster recovery after vestibular schwannoma resection.
•• Albathi M, Oyer S, Ishii LE, Byrne P, Ishii M, Boahene KO. Early nerve grafting for facial paralysis after cerebellopontine angle tumor resection with preserved facial nerve continuity. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2016;18:54–60 This article investigates the use of hypoglossal to facial nerve transfer and masseteric nerve transfer for patients with uninterrupted facial nerves after cerebellopontine angle tumor resections. The authors recommend facial nerve reanimation in patients with no improvement in facial function by 6 months post-operatively.
Knott PD. A facial nerve anniversary-twelve months of treatment time saved. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2016;18:60–1.
Fattah AY, Gurusinghe ADR, Gavilan J, Hadlock TA, Marcus JR, Marres H, et al. Facial nerve grading instruments: systematic review of the literature and suggestion for uniformity. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;135:569–79. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000000905.
• Banks CA, Jowett N, Hadlock TA. (2017) Test-retest reliability and agreement between in-person and video assessment of facial mimetic function using the eFACE facial grading system. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamafacial.2016.1620This article highlights the utility of trigeminal to facial nerve transfer in smile reanimation.
House JW, Brackmann DE. Grading of facial nerve function. In: Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 1985:146–7.
Oh TS, Min K, Song SY, Choi JW, Koh KS. Upper eyelid platinum weight placement for the treatment of paralytic lagophthalmos: a new plane between the inner septum and the levator aponeurosis. Arch Plast Surg. 2018;45:222–8. https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2017.01599.
• Kim IA, Wu TJ, Byrne PJ. Paralytic lagophthalmos: comprehensive approach to management. Curr Otorhinolaryngol Rep. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40136-018-0219-zThis article provides comprehensive review of surgical and nonsurgical management techniques for upper facial palsy.
Silver AL, Lindsay RW, Cheney ML, Hadlock TA. Thin-profile platinum eyelid weighting: a superior option in the paralyzed eye. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;123:1697–703. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181a65a56.
Hadlock TA, Greenfield LJ, Wernick-Robinson M, Cheney ML. Multimodality approach to management of the paralyzed face. Laryngoscope. 2006;116:1385–9.
Carlstrom LP, Copeland WR, Neff BA, Castner ML, Driscoll CLW, Link MJ. Incidence and risk factors of delayed facial palsy after vestibular schwannoma resection. Neurosurgery. 2016;78:251–5.
Gjuric M, Rudic M. What is the best tumor size to achieve optimal functional results in vestibular schwannoma surgery? Skull Base. 2008;18:317–25.
Chang S, Makarenko S, Despot I, Dong C, Westerberg BD, Akagami R. Differential recovery in early- and late-onset delayed facial palsy following vestibular schwannoma resection. Oper Neurosurg. 2020;18:34–40.
Grant GA, Rostomily RR, Kim DK, Mayberg MR, Farrell D, Avellino A, et al. Delayed facial palsy after resection of vestibular schwannoma. J Neurosurg. 2002;97:93–6.
Fenton JE, Chin RYK, Kalamarides M, Sterkers O, Sterkers JM, Fagan PA. Delayed facial palsy after vestibular schwannoma surgery. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2001;28:113–6.
Magliulo G, D’Amico R, Di Cello P. Delayed facial palsy after vestibular schwannoma resection: clinical data and prognosis. J Otolaryngol. 2003;32:400–4.
Baugh RF, Basura GJ, Ishii LE, et al. Clinical Practice Guideline: Bell’s Palsy. Otolaryngol Neck Surg. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599813505967.
Kim L, Byrne PJ. Controversies in contemporary facial reanimation. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2016;24:275–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsc.2016.03.016.
Klebuc MJA. Facial reanimation using the masseter-to-facial nerve transfer. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127:1909–15.
Hontanilla B, Olivas J, Cabello Á, Marré D. Cross-face nerve grafting versus masseteric-to-facial nerve transposition for reanimation of incomplete facial paralysis: a comparative study using the FACIAL CLIMA evaluating system. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;142:179e–91e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000004612.
Zhang S, Hembd A, Ching CW, Tolley P, Rozen SM. Early masseter to facial nerve transfer may improve smile excursion in facial paralysis. Plast Reconstr Surg - Glob Open. 2018;6:e2023. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002023.
Zotov AV, Rzaev JA, Chernov SV, Dmitriev AB, Kalinovsky AV, Spallone A. Masseter-to-facial cranial nerve anastomosis: a report of 30 cases. Oper Neurosurg. 2020;19:502–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/ons/opaa140.
Banks CA, Jowett N, Iacolucci C, Heiser A, Hadlock TA. Five-year experience with fifth-to-seventh nerve transfer for smile. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;143:1060e–71e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000005591.
Chen G, Wang W, Wang W, Ding W, Yang X. Symmetry restoration at rest after masseter-to-facial nerve transfer: is it as efficient as smile reanimation? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;140:793–801. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000003698.
• Murphey AW, Clinkscales WB, Oyer SL. Masseteric nerve transfer for facial nerve paralysis a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamafacial.2017.1780This systematic review investigates the use of masseteric nerve transfer for facial paralysis. The authors found the use of masseteric nerve transfer provided improvement in oral commissure excursion and had favorable results in time required for recovery.
Owusu JA, Truong L, Kim JC. Facial nerve reconstruction with concurrent masseteric nerve transfer and cable grafting. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2016;18:335–9.
Lee YS, Ahn JH, Park HJ, Lee HJ, Bae MR, Roh JL, et al. Dual coaptation of facial nerve using masseteric branch of trigeminal nerve for iatrogenic facial palsy: preliminary reports. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2020;129:505–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003489419893722.
Han JH, Suh MJ, Kim JW, Cho HS, Moon IS. Facial reanimation using hypoglossal-facial nerve anastomosis after schwannoma removal. Acta Otolaryngol. 2017;137:99–105.
Kochhar A, Albathi M, Sharon JD, Ishii LE, Byrne P, Boahene KD. Transposition of the intratemporal facial to hypoglossal nerve for reanimation of the paralyzed face: the VII to XII transposition technique. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2016;18:370–8.
Hussain T, Mastrodimos MB, Raju SC, Glasgow HL, Whitney M, Friedman B, et al. Fluorescently labeled peptide increases identification of degenerated facial nerve branches during surgery and improves functional outcome. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0119600. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119600.
Boahene KDO. Dynamic muscle transfer in facial reanimation. Facial Plast Surg. 2008;24:204–10.
Oyer SL, Nellis J, Ishii LE, Boahene KD, Byrne PJ. Comparison of objective outcomes in dynamic lower facial reanimation with temporalis tendon and gracilis free muscle transfer. JAMA Otolaryngol - Head Neck Surg. 2018;144:1162–8.
Croxson GR, Quinn MJ, Coulson SE. Temporalis muscle transfer for facial paralysis: a further refinement. Facial Plast Surg. 2001;16:351–6. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2000-15544.
Bhama PK, Weinberg JS, Lindsay RW, Hohman MH, Cheney ML, Hadlock TA. Objective outcomes analysis following microvascular gracilis transfer for facial reanimation: a review of 10 years’ experience. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2014;16:85–92. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamafacial.2013.2463.
Harii K, Ohmori K, Torii S. Free gracilis muscle transplantation, with microneurovascular anastomoses for the treatment of facial paralysis: a preliminary report. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1976;57:133–43. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-197602000-00001.
Greene JJ, Tavares J, Mohan S, Jowett N, Hadlock T. Long-term outcomes of free gracilis muscle transfer for smile reanimation in Children. J Pediatr. 2018;202:279–284.e2.
Biglioli F, Bayoudh W, Colombo V, Pedrazzoli M, Rabbiosi D. Double innervation (facial/masseter) sur le lambeau gracile dans les réanimations du tiers moyen de la face lors de la prise en charge des paralysies faciales : nouveau concept. Ann Chir Plast Esthétique. 2013;58:89–95.
Boahene KO, Owusu J, Ishii L, Ishii M, Desai S, Kim I, et al. The multivector gracilis free functional muscle flap for facial reanimation. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2018;20:300–6. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamafacial.2018.0048.
Dusseldorp JR, Van Veen MM, Guarin DL, Quatela O, Jowett N, Hadlock TA. Spontaneity assessment in dually innervated gracilis smile reanimation surgery. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2019;21:551–7. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamafacial.2019.1090.
Vila PM, Kallogjeri D, Yaeger LH, Chi JJ. Powering the gracilis for facial reanimation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes based on donor nerve. JAMA Otolaryngol - Head Neck Surg. 2020;146:429–36. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2020.0065.
Greene JJ, Tavares J, Guarin DL, Jowett N, Hadlock T. Surgical refinement following free gracilis transfer for smile reanimation. Ann Plast Surg. 2018;81:329–34.
Hohman MH, Silver AL, Henstrom DK, Cheney ML, Hadlock TA. The “power” brow ift: efficient correction of the paralyzed brow. ISRN Plast Surg. 2012;2013:1–4.
Crawford KL, Stramiello JA, Orosco RK, Greene JJ. Advances in facial nerve management in the head and neck cancer patient. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020;28:235–40.
• Jowett N, Hadlock TA. Free gracilis transfer and static facial suspension for midfacial reanimation in long-standing flaccid facial palsy. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otc.2018.07.009This article discusses indications and surgical technique for gracilis-free muscle transfer for midfacial reanimation. The authors also discuss concurrent static suspension using fascia lata harvest for improved resting symmetry and improved nasal valve patency.
Bassilios Habre S, Googe BJ, Depew JB, Wallace RD, Konofaos P. Depressor reanimation after facial nerve paralysis. Ann Plast Surg. 2019;82:582–90. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000001616.
Miller MQ, Hadlock TA. Beyond botox: contemporary management of nonflaccid facial palsy. Facial Plast Surg Aesthetic Med. 2020;22:65–70. https://doi.org/10.1089/fpsam.2020.0009.
Mehdizadeh OB, Diels J, White WM. Botulinum toxin in the treatment of facial paralysis. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2016;24:11–20.
• Shinn JR, Nwabueze NN, Du L, Patel PN, Motamedi KK, Norton C, et al. Treatment patterns and outcomes in botulinum therapy for patients with facial synkinesis. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamafacial.2018.1962This article highlights the utility of chemodenervation in the management of synkinesis.
Cabin JA, Massry GG, Azizzadeh B. Botulinum toxin in the management of facial paralysis. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015;23:272–80.
Kim J. Contralateral botulinum toxin injection to improve facial asymmetry after acute facial paralysis. Otol Neurotol. 2013;34:319–24.
Cooper L, Lui M, Nduka C. Botulinum toxin treatment for facial palsy: a systematic review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg. 2017;70:833–41.
Fuzi J, Taylor A, Sideris A, Meller C. Does botulinum toxin therapy improve quality of life in patients with facial palsy? Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2020;44:1811–9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This article is part of the Topical collection on OTOLOGY: Vestibular Schwannomas
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Funk, E.K., Greene, J.J. Advances in Facial Reanimation: Management of the Facial Nerve in the Setting of Vestibular Schwannoma. Curr Otorhinolaryngol Rep 9, 177–187 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40136-021-00343-9
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40136-021-00343-9