Abstract
The root system architecture (RSA) is a highly plastic trait and in evitable for plant growth because of its role in water and nutrient acquisition. Soybean, an important economic leguminous crop of India, but its RSA is largely unknown. The RSA of two popular soybean cultivars grown in central India viz., JS-335 and JS-9560 was investigated to compare their root phenotype in a clay soil under laboratory condition. It has been observed that root length, root surface area and root volume of JS-9560 were significantly higher than that of JS-355; whereas root diameter of JS-9560 was significantly lower compared to JS-335. Further, in JS-9560, number of nodes, primary roots, secondary roots, length of primary roots and secondary roots were 17, 8, 20, 24 and 16% higher than JS-335. Primary and secondary root insertion angle was observed to be 33 and 11% narrower in JS-9560 than in JS-335. Based on the findings, JS-9560 showed superior RSA over JS-335 and thus, the cultivar may be consider for further physiological and molecular studies for its adaptability to moisture stress condition.
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
The first ‘green revolution’ has significantly impacted agricultural practices in many parts of the world. But now, the research is increasingly pointing towards “root system architecture (RSA)” as the key factor for improvement in productivity of the future crops [1]. The plant root plays important role in supplying water and nutrient to the crops. The RSA, the spatial configuration of a root system in soil, is a fundamental component of plant productivity and varies among and within crop species, subjects to genotype and environment interaction [2]. It determines the capacity for a plant to search for, and acquire, resources in the dynamic and variable soil environments [3]. Furthermore, increased drought and changes in climate will also increase stress on crops and hence cultivars need to adapt themselves in sustaining yields under changing climatic scenarios. Much of this adaptation is anticipated to the below ground parts, since they are the sites of soil–plant interactions [4].
A typical RSA has several aspects: root typology, topology, geometry of root elements and their spatial distribution in soils [5]. A range of root architectural traits have been linked to plant performances in specific environment [4]. Root length and surface area play an important role in the uptake of both immobile and mobile soil resources [6], whereas rooting depth has an important role in reducing nitrogen losses through leaching and improving drought tolerance [7]. Ge et al. [8] demonstrated that root angle and the resulting orientation of the root system greatly influenced the phosphorous uptake, while Hammer et al. [9] showed that changes in RSA had a direct effect on exploitation of soil water, which consequently affects the cereal yield and biomass. Roots of different orders such as primary and secondary roots play important role in absorbing (radially) and transporting (longitudinally) water and nutrients [10]. Therefore to understand crop root basic functions such as water and nutrient extraction, it is needed to understand the root architectural patterns of different crops and their cultivars. In India, a few studies have been conducted to analyze root system in terms of root length density and its relationship with water-nutrient uptake in soybean [11, 12], but very scarce information is available on root architectural parameters such as root diameter, root surface area, root angle, primary and secondary root etc. of crops. Hence, the study was undertaken to characterize RSA of two contrasting soybean cultivars i.e. JS-335 and JS-9560 with a view to identify their rooting traits in vertisol under laboratory condition.
The current inability to measure root architecture under field conditions is a major impediment to root studies [13]. Therefore, a twenty-day laboratory study was conducted in acrylic tube of size 25 cm height and 5 cm diameter with six replicates per cultivar (Figs. 1, 2). The soil used to pack the tubes was collected from the research farm of ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil Science, Bhopal and has the following characteristics: clay 52%, silt 30%, sand 18%; pH 7.8, cation exchange capacity 49 cmol (p+) kg−1, organic carbon 4.9 g kg−1, inorganic nitrogen 22 mg kg−1 and available phosphorous 4 mg kg−1. Before packing into the tube, the soil was air dried and sieved to <2 mm. Individual pre germinated seeds were planted 30 mm deep in tube. Each tube was secured at the base with perforated cover, to allow free drainage and air entry. Cylinder walls were covered with black plastic to exclude light. Plants were grown under controlled conditions in the laboratory at a mean temperature of 26 °C with a 12 h illumination. After twenty-days, the soil was carefully removed from the cylinders using 10% sodium hexa meta-phosphate solution and gently washed away from the root system with a fine jet of water. The whole root system of each plant was preserved in a solution of 40% methanol, 5% formaldehyde and 5% glacial acetic acid. Length and number of individual root axes and laterals i.e. primary and secondary root length, root nodes and root angles were measured using scale and protractor; whereas root surface area, root volume, root diameter was measured using Delta-T imaging system. Root penetration rate was calculated by root main axis length divided by total number of days of experiment. For calculating the root biomass, fresh roots were placed in drying oven at 65–70 °C until they attained a constant weight.
The RSA study revealed that phenotypical characteristics such as root length, root surface area and root volume of JS-9560 were significantly higher than JS-355; whereas root diameter of JS-9560 was significantly lower than JS-335 (Table 1 and Figs. 1, 2). Total root length, surface area and volume are known to influence the kinetics of water and nutrient uptake [14], whereas fineness of the root system i.e. root diameter—one of the most important input parameters for rhizospheric modelling- influences net ion influx into roots [15]. Therefore higher root length, surface area, volume and finer root diameter indicated that JS-9560 is a more efficient cultivar compared to JS-335 in terms of better acquisition of water and nutrients. Fitter [16] suggested that thinner root diameter increases water and nutrients uptake in plants. Comparing two cultivars of soybean, it has been observed that lateral root branching parameters such as number of nodes, primary roots, secondary roots, length of primary roots and secondary roots were significantly (17, 8, 20, 24 and 16%, respectively) higher in JG-9560 compared to JS-335 (Figs. 3, 4). Fenta et al. [13] suggested that a soybean cultivar with higher lateral branching density is more suitable for drought prone area. Hence, by virtue of higher root branching density, JS-9560 may be considered to grow in moisture deficit condition. Root biomass of crop cultivar is an important architectural characteristic to assess the overall plant health. A crop/cultivar investing higher biomass in their roots could be healthier than others. In this study, JS-9560 had significantly 23% greater root biomass than JS 335, suggesting robustness of JS 9560 under the studied condition (Table 1). Saxena et al. [17] and Krishnamurthy et al. [18] identified several chickpea genotypes with drought tolerance through increased root biomass. Herrera et al. [19] reviewed genotypic variation in root traits and found higher correlation among root biomass, drought tolerance and nutrient uptake. Sheshshayee et al. [20] have also identified root biomass one of the most relevant trait for drought tolerance and productivity.
The knowledge of the root angle spread at an early growth stage can be useful to predict the root distribution and root biomass of mature plants [21]. Between the two cultivars compared, 33 and 11% narrower primary and secondary root insertion angles were observed in JS-9560 compared to JS-335 (Table 1). The root angle influences the relative exploration of shallow and deep soil domains [22]. Manschadi et al [23] reported narrower root angle of wheat cultivar promotes water use efficiency compared to wider root angle. The vertically oriented roots of wheat crop cultivar were able to extract significantly more water from deeper soil layers by increasing their root length, and thus potentially increasing the amount of accessible soil water when the water availability in the upper soil layers was limited [24]. In the present investigation, narrow root angle of cultivar JS-9560, with higher rooting depth and root penetration rate (Table 1 and Figs. 1, 2), indicated higher capabilities of the cultivar to extract soil water from the deeper layers of soil. Lynch, [25] also suggested that deep soil foraging is important for the acquisition of water and nitrate.
From this investigation, it may be concluded that JS-9560 exhibited a better RSA over JS-335. The rooting behaviors of JS-9560 suggested some favorable traits that can be adapted under water stress situation. However other physiological and molecular characteristics related to water stress in plant could be correlated with the rooting behavior of JS-9560 to consider it for drought situation.
References
Anonymous (2011) Root health—the key to important yield. www.syngenta.com
Lynch J (1995) Root architecture and plant productivity. Plant Physiol 109:7–13
Lynch JP, Brown KM (2012) New roots for agriculture: exploiting the root phenome. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 367:1598–1604
Dunbabin VM, Postma JA, Schnepf A, Pagès L, Javaux M, Wu L, Leitner D, Chen YL, Rengel Z, Diggle AJ (2013) Modelling root–soil interactions using three-dimensional models of root growth, architecture and function. Plant Soil 372:93–124
Zhang WP, Shen XY, Wu P, Hu B, Liao CY (2001) QTLs and epistasis for seminal root length under a different water supply in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Theor Appl Genet 103:118–123
Liao M, Palta JA, Fillery IRP (2006) Root characteristics of vigorous wheat improve early nitrogen uptake. Aust J Agric Res 57:1097–1107
Bernier J, Serraj R, Kumar A, Venuprasad R, Impa S, Gowda RPV, Oane R, Spaner D, Atlin G (2009) The large-effect drought-resistance QTL qtl12.1 increases water uptake in upland rice. Field Crop Res 110:139–146
Ge Z, Rubio G, Lynch J (2000) The importance of root gravitropism for inter-root competition and phosphorus acquisition efficiency: results from a geometric simulation model. Plant Soil 1:159–171
Hammer GL, Dong ZS, McLean G, Doherty A, Messina C, Schusler J (2009) Can changes incanopy and/or root system architecture explain historical maize yield trends in the US Corn Belt? Crop Sci 49:299–312
Doussan C, Vercambre G, Pagès L (1998) Modelling of the hydraulic architecture of root systems: an integrated approach to water absorption–distribution of axial and radial conductance in maize. Ann Bot 81:225–232
Ghosh PK, MohantyM BandyopadhyayKK, PainuliDK MisraAK (2006) Growth, competition, yield advantage and economics in soybean/pigeonpea intercropping system in semi-arid tropics of India: II. Effect of subsoiling. Field Crop Res 96:180–189
Mohanty M, Bandyopadhyay KK, Painuli DK, Ghosh PK, Misra AK, Hati KM (2007) Water transmission characteristics of a Vertisol and water useefficiency of rainfed soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) under subsoiling and manuring. Soil Tillage Res 93:420–428
Fenta AB, Beebe SE, Kunert KJ, Burridge JD, Barlow KM, Lynch JP, Foyer HC (2014) Field phenotyping of soybean roots for drought stress tolerance. Agron J 4:418–435
Himmelbauer ML, Loiskandl W, Kastanek F (2004) Estimating length, average diameter and surface area of roots using two different Image analyses systems. Plant Soil 260:111–120
Tagliavini M, Veto LJ, Looney NE (1993) Measuring root surface area and mean root diameter of peach seedlings by digital image analysis. HortScience 28:1129–1130
Fitter AH (1985) Functional significance of rootmorphology and root system architecture. In: Fitter AH, Atkinson D, Read DJ, Usher MB (eds) Ecological interactions in soil. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 87–106
Saxena NP, Krishnamurthy L, Johansen C (1993) Registration of a drought resistant chickpea germplasm. Crop Sci 33:1424–1426
Krishnamurthy L, Johansen C, Ito O (1996) Genotypic variation in root system development and its implications for drought resistance in chickpea. In: Adu-GyamfiJj, Katayama K, Kumar Rao JVDK, Rego TJ (eds) Roots and nitrogen in cropping systems of the semi-arid tropics. JIRCAR, Ibaraki
Herrer JM, Verhulst N, Govaerts B (2012) Strategies to identify genetic diversity in root traits. In: Reynolds MP, Pask AJD, Mullan DM (eds) Physiological breeding I: interdisciplinary approaches to improve crop adaptation. CIMMYT, Mexico
Sheshshayee MS, Abou-Kheir E, Sreevathsa R, Srivastava N, Mohanraju B, Nataraja KN, Prasad TG, Udayakumar M (2011) Phenotyping for root traits and their improvement through biotechnological approaches for sustaining crop productivity. In: Costa de Oliveira A, Varshney RK (eds) Root Genomics. Springer, Heidelberg. ISBN 978-3-540-85545-3
Singh V, van OosteromE, JordanD, HammeG (2010) Genotypic variability for nodal root angle in sorghum and its implications on potential water extraction. In: Proceedings of the 1st Australian summer grains conference, Gold Coast, Australia, 21st–24th June 2010
York LM, Nord EA, Lynch JP (2013) Integration of root phenes for soil resource acquisition. Front Plant Sci 4:355
Manschadi MA, Christopher J, De Voil P, Hammer GL (2006) The role of root architectureal traits in adaptation of wheat to water-limited environments. Funct Plant Biol 33:823–837
Sanguineti MC, Li S, Maccaferri M, Corneti S, Rotondo F, Chiari T, Tuberosa R (2007) Genetic dissection of seminal root architecture in elite durum wheat germplasm. Ann Appl Biol 1(51):291–305
Lynch JP (2013) Steep, cheap and deep: an ideotype to optimize water and N acquisition by maize root systems. Ann Bot 112:347–357
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sinha, N.K., Mohanty, M., Somasundaram, J. et al. Root Phenotyping of Two Soybean (Glycine max L.) Cultivars in a Vertisol of Central India. Natl. Acad. Sci. Lett. 40, 309–313 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40009-017-0588-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40009-017-0588-8