Abstract
The use of insecticides, especially neonicotinoids (NEOCs), poses a significant threat to honey bees, thus prompting the EU to ban all outdoor uses of clothianidin, imidacloprid, and thiamethoxam. However, due to the persistence of NEOCs, as well as the fact that certain NEOCs are in use in some areas of the world, exposure to them is still an on-going issue. In the present study, we used laboratory acute toxicity test to examine the effects of sublethal concentrations (resulting in consumed doses approximately 50, 20, and 5 times below LD50) of thiacloprid and clothianidin on selected parameters of antioxidative defense (superoxide dismutase, catalase, glutathione S-transferase activities), oxidative status (reduced glutathione, protein thiols, malondialdehyde), neurotoxicity (acetylcholinesterase activity), and immune response (prophenoloxidase and phenoloxidase activities) in honey bees. Results indicated that both neonicotinoids’ sublethal concentrations promote oxidative stress in honey bees and affect their immune defense. NEOCs impair detoxification abilities through reduced glutathione S-transferase activity, as well as disturb immune response due to decreased prophenoloxidase and phenoloxidase activities, which can explain the high toxicity of these substances to honey bees.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
The honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) is one of the most important pollinator species worldwide in both natural and agroecosystems. Through pollination, as an important ecosystem service, they provide biodiversity and have a great impact on global economy (Potts et al. 2010; Khalifa et al. 2021). Over the past decades, losses of managed honey bees’ colonies in Europe and North America had been reported (van Engelsdorp and Meixner 2010; Potts et al. 2010). It is strongly suggested the causes of this are multifactorial, and numerous harmful factors have been suspected as possible reasons for the observed losses. Malnutrition, climate changes, pollution, apicultural practice, pests, and pathogens, as well as use of agrochemicals, are the most prominent risk factors (van Engelsdorp and Meixner 2010; Jacques et al. 2017). The use of insecticides poses a significant threat, especially widespread use of neonicotinoids (NEOCs) (Blacquière et al. 2012; Tosi et al. 2017; Woodcock et al. 2017).
NEOCs are a class of insecticides with high toxicity for insects. They had been commercialized in the 1990s and became the most used insecticides for agricultural pest management (Jeschke et al. 2011). High persistence of NEOCs, with a half-life ranging from few months to years, depending on the compound and conditions, water solubility, and high potential for spreading over to adjacent soils and plants, caused their accumulation and environmental contamination (see the review article by Goulson 2013). Consequently, NEOCs were found in different matrices such as soil, plants, nectar and bee pollen many years after application, not only in cultivated fields, but also in wildflowers, ecological focus areas, and organic fields (Liu et al. 2010; Mullin et al. 2010; Krupke et al. 2012; López-Fernández et al. 2015; Botías et al. 2016; Blacquière and van der Steen 2017; Humann‐Guilleminot et al. 2019; Wintermantel et al. 2020). Thus, many of the non-target insects are exposed to NEOCs, usually manifesting sublethal effects (Blacquière et al. 2012; Brandt et al. 2016, 2017, 2020). Acting as agonists of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor, NEOCs interfere with neuronal cholinergic signal transduction, thus causing abnormal behavior, paralysis, and eventually death of an insect (Tomizawa and Casida 2005; Brandt et al. 2020).
Honey bees are consequently exposed to pollution-contaminated food resources since they cover large areas through their foraging activity (Krupke et al. 2012; Ruschioni et al. 2013). Harmful sublethal effects of NEOCs on the memory (Christen et al. 2016), susceptibility to infections (Alaux et al. 2010), reproduction (Williams et al. 2015), and development (Wu et al. 2011) of honey bees have been reported. Accordingly, there had been concerns about the usage of NEOCs. The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) determined that NEOCs were particularly harmful to bees and in 2013, the EU placed a moratorium on the use of three NEOCs–clothianidin, imidacloprid, and thiamethoxam–for the protection of bee-attractive crops (European Commission 2013). According to the new assessments based on a survey of 1500 studies in 2018, the EU banned all outdoor uses of those NEOCs due to concerns about the adverse effects on pollinators (Blake 2018), but they were still allowed to be used in greenhouses. Subsequently, in January 2020, non-renewal of approval of the neonicotinoid pesticide thiacloprid came into force (European Commission 2020). This was in accordance with scientific advice by the EFSA that thiacloprid presents health and environmental concerns. However, in other areas of the world, such as North America and non-EU countries, NEOCs are still in use due to estimated economic and societal benefits (Blake 2018). Relevant regulatory authorities (European Food Safety Authority 2014) emphasize the importance of assessing the impact of environmental pollution on bee health, pointing out the importance of colony monitoring, field, and laboratory tests, as well as the evaluation of the effects of sublethal doses of various pollutants for bees (European Food Safety Authority 2015). All of that makes the study of the sublethal effects of NEOCs on non-target insects still immensely relevant, particularly in regard to honey bee (Alaux et al. 2010; Blacquière et al. 2012; Di Prisco et al. 2013; Brandt et al. 2016, 2017, 2020).
The immune defense of honey bees can be affected by NEOCs’ sublethal concentrations. One of important components of innate immune insect defense are phenoloxidase (POx) and prophenoloxidase (proPOx). Both enzymes are important components in the defense against wounding and infection in insects (Pham and Schneider 2008). POx catalyzes two reactions in melanogenesis, as a major innate immune defense mechanism of insects and determinant factor for outcome of an infection (Nakhleh et al. 2017). POx is synthesized in hemocytes as zymogen, proPOx, which is activated by a specific proteolytic cleavage. At the same time, this is a limiting factor in melanization (Pham and Schneider 2008). POx does not seem to be an indicator of resistance but rather of host condition, and it has been reported that individuals in better conditions produce higher levels of proPOX and/or POx (González-Santoyo and Córdoba-Aguilar 2012). Due to the complexity of obtaining bee hemolymph, these hemocyte enzymes are mainly analyzed in honey bee tissue homogenates, where a decrease in POx and proPOx activities were usually detected after exposure to NEOCs (Badawy et al. 2015; Zhu et al. 2017).
Furthermore, it is known that exposure to NEOCs is accompanied by the adverse changes in biochemical levels in honey bees, even in sublethal doses (Boily et al. 2013; Gauthier et al. 2018). Thus, an increase in activity of acetylcholinesterase (AChE), a key enzyme involved in the termination of impulse transmission, has been reported in numerous studies and suggested as a potential biomarker of honey bee exposure to NEOCs (Boily et al. 2013; Samson-Robert et al. 2015). Many studies demonstrated that most of NEOCs promote oxidative stress in honey bees (Carvalho et al. 2013; Balieira et al. 2018; Gauthier et al. 2018). This stress leads to damage in the biomolecules and causes changes in the antioxidant defense system (ADS) in both enzymatic and non-enzymatic components. Increasing level of malondialdehyde (MDA), as a marker of lipid peroxidation, is often reported in honey bees after an exposure to NEOCs (Balieira et al. 2018; Gauthier et al. 2018), while activity of key antioxidative enzymes of honey bee, such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), glutathione S-transferase (GST), have also been measured, as usual (Badiou-Bénéteau et al. 2012; Carvalho et al. 2013; Balieira et al. 2018).
To better explain the exposure of honey bees to environmentally realistic concentrations of NEOCs, we tested two NEOCs, clothianidin and thiacloprid, at sublethal concentrations in honey bees, following an acute oral exposure. Taking into account the harmful influence of NEOCs on the honey bee, as well as the importance of revealing consequential changes in the immune response and antioxidant defense in these insects, we determined the activities of AChE, phenoloxidase, prophenoloxidase, SOD, CAT, and GST enzymes, as well as content of known biochemical indicators of oxidative status (reduced glutathione, protein thiols, and MDA) in honey bees, following pesticides exposure.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Honey bee sample collection
Honey bee workers were collected from a beehive of the Faculty of Sciences at the University of Novi Sad (45.2473° N, 19.8539° E) in July 2015. The colony was managed by experienced beekeeper in according to good beekeeper practice (FAO et al. 2021). The bee colony was strong (approximately 20,000 bees), with no clinical signs of infectious diseases. No chemical treatments against Varroa destructor or other diseases were applied during and before the experiment at least 6 months. To reduce the biological variation of the sample, worker honey bees of the same queen and approximately of the same age were used. Adult worker bees were collected from the top super, from frames containing honey and pollen, to ensure sampling of older bees in according to Medrzycki et al. 2013. After collecting the bees in plastic jars, they were immediately transferred to the laboratory.
2.2 Acute toxicity test of pesticides
In the laboratory, honey bees were anesthetized via exposure to carbon dioxide gas for no longer than 3 min and transferred into 1000-mL glass jars covered with nylon mesh, each containing 30 bees. Food was given ad libitum through an inverted plastic container with the small hole in the center of the lid, placed on top of the nylon mesh. Treated groups of honey bees were left to feed with 1 mol/L sucrose solution containing three sublethal concentrations of thiacloprid and clothianidin during 48 h, in controlled conditions at 25 °C, 65% RH, and in the dark. Control bees were fed with the sucrose solution without the addition of pesticides. Sublethal pesticide concentrations were chosen to give consumed doses as approximately 50-, 20-, and fivefold range (LD50/50, LD50/20, and LD50/5) of median lethal dose for thiacloprid (17.94 μg per honey bee) and clothianidin (3.68 ng per honey bee), determined by the acute oral toxicity test for honey bees (US EPA 1991, OPP Pesticide Ecotoxicity Database). The treatments represent concentrations of 2.69 μg/mL (T1), 6.72 μg/mL (T2), and 26.91 μg/mL (T3) of thiacloprid in feeding solution and 0.55 ng/mL (C1), 1.38 ng/mL (C2), and 5.52 ng/mL (C3) for clothianidin. Chosen concentration match to often reported clothianidin residues that were usually over to 2 ng/g, but maximum measurements were reported in the study Humann-Guilleminot et al. (2019) that were up to 18 ng/g in soil and 6.7 ng/g in plant. Reported measurement was published after the EU restricted the use of three NEOCs, including clothianidin (European Commission 2013). On the other hand, manufacturers usually label thiacloprid (LD50 is 17.3 μg/honey bee) as safe for bees and without restrictions on use during the flowering. Even though reported thiacloprid residues in bee pollen were up to 1000 μg/kg (López-Fernández et al. 2015), we chose even higher concentration, because local exposure of honey bees could be higher considering permitted pest treatments of thiacloprid during the bloom (Siede et al. 2017). Each pesticide concentration, as well as control, was tested with three biological replicates of 30 randomly selected bees. The total number of experimental bees was 270 for each tested pesticide, with the addition of 90 control bees.
After 48 h, the bee mortality was recorded, the volume of food consumed was determined as a difference in mass of feeding solution before and after conducted treatment, taking into account the density, and expressed as μL per honey bee. From each of three replicates of control and treatment groups, ten surviving bees were taken for hemolymph isolation. According to the method by Hartfelder et al. (2013), honey bee workers were first calmed at 4 °C for a few minutes. Then, the bee was held with forceps, and hemolymph was isolated from dorsal vascular vessel, by incision between the 5th and 6th abdominal segment with sterile needle and hemolymph was collected with micropipette (volume was approx. 1–5 μL per honey bee). These bees were no longer used for any analysis. The hemolymph samples were immediately frozen using dry ice and stored at −70 °C for further analysis. The remaining surviving bees were collected and transferred into plastic vials which were immediately frozen in dry ice and stored at −20 °C for further homogenization and analysis.
2.3 Sample preparation for biochemical analysis
Homogenization of whole bodies of five intact worker bees per each of three replicates of control and treatment groups was performed in ice-cold 50 mmol/L Tris–HCl buffer pH 7.4 to obtain 10% w/v homogenates. Crude homogenates were centrifuged at 10,000 g (4 °C) for 10 min, and the supernatants were further aliquoted and frozen until enzymatic assays and redox status assessment (Kojić et al. 2019). In this way, for each analyzed parameter, three biological replicates were provided for each experimental group (control and treatments), and further analyses of the samples were performed in a technical duplicate or triplicate.
2.4 Measurement of acetylcholinesterase activity
Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) enzymatic activity was measured spectrophotometrically using the colorimetric method (Ellman et al. 1961), optimized for microplate assay. The Ellman method is based on acetylthiocholine hydrolysis by acetylcholinesterase to give thiocholine and acetate. Thiocholine further reacts with DTNB (5,5′-dithiobis (2-nitrobenzoic acid)) giving yellow color nitrobenzoate, which shows an increase in intensity measured on spectrophotometer at 412 nm during 10 min. The reaction mixture was prepared mixing 100 mM phosphate buffer pH 8.0, 75 mM acetylthiocholine iodide, and 10 mM DTNB in 150:2:5 ratio, and reaction was started by addition of 50 μL of 10% w/v honey bee homogenate, in the final volume of 300 μL. The activity was calculated based on an extinction coefficient of 13.6 mM/cm, in which one unit of AChE is the amount of enzyme that catalyzes the production of 1 μmol of thiocholine per minute, expressed per milligram of protein.
2.5 Measurement of MDA, GSH and -SH groups concentration
MDA levels in bee homogenates were measured according to the method of Slater (1984), which is based on the principle that malondialdehyde, the specific product of lipid peroxidation, reacts with thiobarbituric acid (TBA) to form a colored complex with maximum absorption at 532 nm. Samples of 10% w/v honey bee homogenate (up to 0.5 mL) was mixed with 1 mL of a mixture of 0.375% w/v TBA and 15% w/v trichloroacetic acid and heated on a water bath for 15 min at 90 °C. After cooling the reaction mixture on ice and centrifugation at 1000 g for 10 min, supernatant was further used for spectrophotometric determination of thiobarbituric acid reactive substance (TBARS) concentration. Concentrations in the sample being calculated from a standard curve using MDA as a standard and expressed in nanomole per milligram of protein.
Concentrations of reduced glutathione (GSH) and free thiol (-SH) groups were determined by the Ellman method (Ellman 1959), optimized for microplate assay. Proteins in the samples of 10% w/v honey bee homogenates were precipitated with 4% sulphosalicylic acid. Supernatant was further used for GSH determination, and the pellet, after washing twice with 2% sulphosalicylic acid and resuspension in 6 M guanidine-HCl pH 6.0, was used for determination of protein thiol groups. Using DTNB as substrate, reduced glutathione in supernatant and the free -SH groups in resuspended pellet formed TNB (2-nitro-5-thiobenzoic acid), a product of reaction which is further monitored at 412 nm. Concentrations in the sample being calculated from a standard curve using GSH as a standard and expressed in nanomole per milligram of protein.
2.6 Measurement of antioxidative enzymes activity
The activity of superoxide dismutase was measured by inhibition of cytochrome c reduction by superoxide radical produced in the xanthine-xanthine oxidase reaction at 550 nm (McCord and Fridovich 1968). SOD catalyzes the dismutation reaction of superoxide anion radical, so inhibition of cytochrome c reduction is proportional to the SOD activity present in the sample. The SOD activity required to reduce the rate of cytochrome c reduction by 50%, with a change in absorbance of 0.025/min in initial (uninhibited) xanthine-xanthine oxidase mixture, is defined as the unit of activity of this enzyme, which is further expressed per milligram of protein.
Catalase activity was measured as the rate of hydrogen peroxide decomposition at 240 nm, based on the method by Aebi (1984). The procedure involved adjusting the absorbance of the hydrogen peroxide solution in 50 mM phosphate buffer pH 7.0 to obtaining the range of 0.52 to 0.55. The decrease in absorbance at 240 nm was monitored for 3 min, after addition of 10% w/v honey bee homogenates, which was proportional to the catalase activity in the sample and further expressed per milligram of protein.
Glutathione S-transferase activity was determined by following the formation of the product of the reaction between reduced glutathione and 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene (CDNB) at 340 nm, described by Habig et al. (1974). GST activity is measured as the rate of the formation of CDNB-glutathione conjugate, followed by a change in absorption at 340 nm for 3 min, and further expressed per milligram of protein. Protein concentration was determined using the Bradford method (1976), with bovine serum albumin as a protein standard.
2.7 Measurement of prophenoloxidase and phenoloxidase activity
Phenoloxidase activity in its zymogenic (proPOx) and active form (POx) was determined in honey bee hemolymph by protocol published by Laughton and Siva-Jothy (2011). The method is based on the conversion of DOPA (3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine) as a substrate, by phenoloxidase, resulting in the formation of a red-brown product dopachrome, whose absorbance is measured at 492 nm. The reaction mixture for determining POx activity contained hemolymph sample (40 μL), distilled water (50 μL), and 16 mmol/L L-DOPA (110 μL), which started the reaction. To determine the activity of proPOx, an additional step of activation, incubation of the zymogenic form of the enzyme with chymotrypsin, is required. Therefore, the reaction mixture for proPOx contained 0.5 mg/mL chymotrypsin (50 μL) instead of distilled water. Specific activity of enzymes was expressed as units of enzyme activity per milligram of protein.
2.8 Data analysis
Percent corrected mortality was calculated for each treatment using Abbott’s equation (Abbott 1925). Statistical analysis was performed using Statistica version 13 (StatSoft, Inc., Tulsa, OK, USA) software. All the data are expressed as mean ± SD (standard deviation). Results are tested on normality and homogeneity of variance suggesting that required assumptions for one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) are met; therefore, statistical differences between each treatment and control values of the analyzed parameters were determined by ANOVA, followed by post hoc Tukey test at p < 0.05 (*).
3 Results
3.1 Survival and pesticides consumption
The results regarding the toxicity of thiacloprid and clothianidin, followed acute exposure, on survival and food consumption are summarized in Table I. Three sublethal concentrations in the feeding solution for thiacloprid of 2.69, 6.72, and 26.9 μg/mL (T1, T2, and T3), resulted in consumed doses of 0.295, 0.674, and 1.956 μg/honey bee, respectively. Consumed doses were approximately 60, 25, and 10 times lesser than LD50 (17.94 μg/honey bee). For clothianidin, feeding with three sublethal concentrations of 0.55, 1.38, and 5.52 ng/mL (C1, C2, and C3) resulted in consumed doses of 0.072, 0.191, and 0.664 ng/honey bee, respectively. LD50 for clothianidin is 3.68 ng/honey bee, and the tested doses were LD50/50, LD50/20, and LD50/5. There was uneven consumption of feeding solutions; thiacloprid consumption was significantly (p ≤ 0.01) lower than clothianidin consumption. Mortality of treatment groups was corrected for the mortality rate of the control (4.4%) using Abbott’s formula (Abbott 1925). Mortality is higher than control for all treatments with NEOCs, in the ranges from 1.15 to 8.13% for clothianidin and 5.81 to 9.23% for thiacloprid.
3.2 Acetylcholinesterase activity
After the exposure of the honey bees to thiacloprid and clothianidin for 48 h, the activity of AChE increased in all treated groups compared to control (24.3 mU/mg protein). Statistically significant (p < 0.05) increase in AChE activity was observed only for the middle dose of thiacloprid (30.3 mU/mg protein), as well as the lowest (31.4 mU/mg protein) and the highest (30.0 mU/mg protein) doses of clothianidin (Figure 1).
3.3 Parameters of redox status
To estimate the effects of honey bees’ exposure to thiacloprid and clothianidin on their redox status, we measured levels of malondialdehyde (MDA), reduced glutathione (GSH), and protein thiol (-SH) groups. Results are shown in Table II.
Exposure of honey bees to the highest concentration of both NEOCs (T3, C3) induced a significant (p < 0.05) increase in MDA level (1.39 and 1.49 nmol/mg protein, respectively) in comparison with control (0.84 nmol/mg protein), indicating a high level of lipid peroxidation in honey bees in these groups. GSH level significantly (p < 0.05) increased after exposure to the lowest concentration of thiacloprid (T1) to 14.5 nmol/mg protein and the highest concentrations of both NEOCs (T3, C3) to the levels of 13.6 and 16.1 nmol/mg protein, respectively, in comparison with control (11.1 nmol/mg protein). Treatment with thiacloprid had no effect on protein thiol groups level; however, statistically significant (p < 0.05) increase, was observed after exposure to lower concentrations of clothianidin (C1, C2) to the values of 175 and 185 nmol/mg protein, respectively, in comparison with the control (140 nmol/mg protein).
3.4 Activity of antioxidative enzymes
Thiacloprid had no effect on activities of SOD and CAT, while all sublethal thiacloprid concentration (T1, T2, T3) significantly (p < 0.05) reduced GST activity (142, 145, and 129 U/mg protein, respectively) in honey bees, compared to control (196 U/mg protein) (Fig. 2). Clothianidin significantly (p < 0.05) affected activity of all measured enzymes compared to control (Figure 2) by increasing the SOD activity in C1 and C3 groups (127 and 113 U/mg protein, respectively, compared to 95.3 U/mg protein in control) and CAT activity in C1 and C2 groups (223 and 217 U/mg protein, respectively, compared to 166 U/mg protein in control), while the activity of GST was reduced (148 U/mg protein), but only after exposure to the highest concentration (C3), compared to control (196 U/mg protein).
3.5 Activity of prophenoloxidase and phenoloxidase
Treatment with both NEOCs induced a statistically significant (p < 0.05) decrease in activity of proPOx and POx in honey bees, except for the lowest concentration of thiacloprid (T1) which did not affect these enzymes (Figure 3). Activity of POx was more affected than proPOx. Medium and the highest concentrations of thiacloprid (T2, T3) reduced the activity of proPOx by about 50%, and the activity of POx by about 66% and 87%, respectively, in comparison with control (122 mU/mg protein for proPOx and 87.1 mU/mg protein for POx). Clothianidin induced a reduction of proPOx by about 50% and POx by about 60% in all treatments.
4 Discussion
In the present study, we examined the effects of three sublethal concentrations of two neonicotinoids, thiacloprid, and clothianidin, on selected parameters of oxidative status and AChE activity, as well as on proPOx and POx activities, as they are important enzymes involved in the immune response. Results indicated that both neonicotinoids’ sublethal concentrations promote oxidative stress in honey bees and affect their immune defense inducing increased level of MDA, AChE activity, and reducing activities of proPOx and POx. Activity of SOD and CAT, as first-line antioxidative enzymes, increasing only after exposure of honey bees to clothianidin, but GST activity decreasing in all thiacloprid treated groups and after the highest concentration of clothianidin exposure of honey bees.
In our study both NEOCs, thiacloprid and clothianidin, increased activity of AChE. These results are in accordance with the study of Boily et al. (2013), which proposed that the increased activity of AChE is a potential biomarker of exposure of bees to neonicotinoids. In comparison with exposure for 10 days in chronic study of Boily et al. (2013), increased AChE activity after 48 h in our study suggests that AChE is also a sensitive biomarker of early NEOCs exposure. AChE is an enzyme involved in termination of nerve impulses by catalyzing the hydrolysis of neurotransmitter acetylcholine (Čolović et al. 2013). Boily et al. (2013) explained the increased activity of AChE by NEOCs occupying the binding site of acetylcholine, consequently inducing an accumulation of this molecule in the synapses, and stimulating the activity of AChE in a typical substrate-enzyme cellular response. On the other hand, similar study of Badawy et al. (2015) reported decreasing activity of AChE after 24-h oral exposure of honey bees to NEOCs, which suggested that the effect of NEOCs to AChE activity is probably time-dependent and may have a biphasic response. NEOCs or their metabolites can either entirely inhibit or just reduce AChE activity by unspecific protein binding, which was detected as a decrease in AChE activity in the honey bee after acute oral treatment for 24 h (Badawy et al. 2015). Compounded with the accumulation of acetylcholine in the synapses (Boily et al. 2013), there could be an increase in the expression and synthesis of AChE in the honey bee, which may elevate AChE activity after prolonged treatments.
Many studies predicted that oxidative stress is one of the possible mechanisms of pesticide toxicity (Badiou-Bénéteau et al. 2012; Balieira et al. 2018; Olgun et al. 2020). The results in our study clearly indicated induction of oxidative stress in honey bees after an exposure to sublethal doses of thiacloprid and clothianidin. We found that MDA levels were significantly higher in honey bees after exposures to the highest tested doses (C3 and T3) of both NEOCs in comparison with control, and that CAT and SOD activities were increased only for clothianidin exposure. Malondialdehyde (MDA) is the end product of lipid peroxidation indicating disturbance of cell membrane as a consequence of oxidative stress (Ayala et al. 2014; Balieira et al. 2018). Our results are in accordance with Balieira et al. (2018) that reported increased MDA level about 2.5-fold after exposure of honey bee to imidacloprid, as well as increased SOD, CAT, and GPx activities. Additionally, Abdelkader et al. (2019) reported twofold MDA level increase in drone semen after their exposure to sublethal concentration of clothianidin, also followed by increased SOD, CAT and GPx activities.
Exposure of honey bees to all tested sublethal doses of thiacloprid significantly lowered GST activity, but for the clothianidin, only the highest dose (C3) significantly reduced GST activity. Also, the corrected mortality for abovementioned doses reached high values (above 5%), suggesting that decreased GST activity could be a sensitive biomarker of the adverse effects of NEOCs. GST is one of the major detoxification enzymes in honey bee, but due to glutathione peroxidase (GPx) activities, GST is also considered as part of ADS. There are many studies which reported increased GST activity as a consequence to NEOCs’ exposure (Vidau et al. 2011; Badiou-Bénéteau et al. 2012; Dussaubat et al. 2016). However, Yao et al. (2018) reported no effects on GST activity in honey bee after exposure to clothianidin sublethal dose of 2.6 ng/mL. Our results are in agreement with this study because in our study lower concentrations of clothianidin (C1 and C2) did not have effect on GST activity, but only the highest one (C3). It is very interesting that a reduction of GST activity was accompanied by an increasing level of its cofactor, GSH. Many studies reported a decrease in GSH level in animal tissue after exposure to insecticides (Bebe and Panemangalore 2005; El-Gendy et al. 2010). GSH is an antioxidant and a component of non-enzymatic ADS, but also a reducing equivalent for action of GPx. Possibly, reported increase of GPx activity (Balieira et al. 2018; Abdelkader et al. 2019) and/or decrease in GST activity induced the elevation of GSH level to protect sensitive protein thiol groups (-SH). In our study, the tested sublethal doses of thiacloprid had no effect on protein thiol groups, but lower doses of clothianidin increased protein thiols in honey bees. It could be that some protein thiols have an important role to protect honey bee to sublethal doses of clothianidin such as thioredoxin and glutaredoxin as important part of insect’s thiol-redox homeostasis (Yao et al. 2014). In addition, the two tested lower doses of clothianidin in our study had no effect on MDA level, GST activity, and GSH level in honey bees; also mortality is less than 5% in these experimental groups, which could be in relation to before mentioned increasing of protective protein’s thiol groups.
The exposure of honey bees to sublethal doses of thiacloprid and clothianidin reduced the activities of proPOx and POx in hemolymph of honey bee. All tested doses of clothianidin significantly decrease activity of both enzymes, but thiacloprid only for the two higher doses (T2 and T3). These results correspond to toxicity of examined NEOCs. Decreasing activities of both enzymes are in accordance with the results obtained in the study Brandt et al. (2016) that sublethal doses of NEOCs, including thiacloprid and clothianidin, affected hemocytes count, encapsulation reaction, and antimicrobial activity in honey bee. Also, the study Di Prisco et al. (2013) reported that clothianidin negatively modulates NF-κB immune signaling and adversely affects antiviral immune defenses in honey bee. It could be that the activity of POx and proPOx are under control of the signaling pathway regulated by this transcription factor. In the study of Li et al. (2017), no effect of sublethal dose of clothianidin on proPOx protein expression was observed. Reasons for this disagreement with our result could be due to the author’s measurement of proPOx by ELISA assay which detects only proteins, but no enzyme activities. Also, for assay they used brain and thorax tissues. As proPOx and POx are plasma proteins in insect hemolymph, testing activities of these enzymes in hemolymph in our study is a more representative procedure. Furthermore, there are different mechanisms for control of enzyme activity, and protein expression and activity are not necessarily in direct correlation.
Results obtained in our study clearly indicate that reduced activity of enzymes involved in detoxification (GST) and immune response (proPOx and POx), as well as increased level of lipid peroxidation, could be responsible for vulnerability of honey bee to parasite and virus infection induced by their exposure to sublethal doses of NEOCs and at least partly responsible for the losses of managed honey bee colonies in broader context. Also, neural enzyme (AChE) is modulated by exposure to both NEOCs, leading to neurotransmission disturbance. It is necessary to emphasize that thiacloprid, which is classified as a less toxic NEOC than clothianidin, still has a significant adverse effect on analyzed enzymes. In order to protect the honey bees, complete restrictions of its use in the future should be considered, especially for bee foraging plants. One of the possible solutions could be the transition from a conventional chemical pesticide to use of alternative biopesticides for biological control of pests. Also, regarding the process for assessing risks of pesticides to honey bees based on determination of lethal dose, it is important to mention that an absence of mortality does not always imply a functional integrity of individual bees. In this study, we raised concerns about the NEOCs-mediated effects on enzymes responsible for regulating important physiological processes that may in turn affect the health and survival of individual bees and possibly lead to the colony collapse. Therefore, assessment of recognized honey bee biomarkers at sublethal pesticide doses should be mandatory in the review process of existing pesticides or registration of new formulations.
Data availability
The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
Abbott WS (1925) A method of computing effectiveness of an insecticide. J Econ Entomol 18:265–267
Abdelkader FB, Kairo G, Bonnet M, Barbouche N, Belzunces LP, Brunet JL (2019) Effects of clothianidin on antioxidant enzyme activities and malondialdehyde level in honey bee drone semen. J Apicult Res 58(5):740–745
Aebi H (1984) Catalase in vitro. Methods Enzymol 105:121–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(84)05016-3
Alaux C, Brunet JL, Dussaubat C, Mondet F, Tchamitchan S, Cousin M, Brillard J, Baldy A, Belzunces LP, Le Conte Y (2010) Interactions between Nosema microspores and a neonicotinoid weaken honeybees (Apis mellifera). Environ Microbiol 12(3):774–782. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.02123.x
Ayala A, Muñoz MF, Argüelles S (2014) Lipid peroxidation: production, metabolism, and signaling mechanisms of malondialdehyde and 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2014:360438. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/360438
Badawy MEI, Nasr HM, Rabea EI (2015) Toxicity and biochemical changes in the honey bee Apis mellifera exposed to four insecticides under laboratory conditions. Apidologie 46(2):177–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13592-014-0315-0
Badiou-Bénéteau A, Carvalho SM, Brunet JL, Carvalho GA, Buleté A, Giroud B, Belzunces LP (2012) Development of biomarkers of exposure to xenobiotics in the honey bee Apis mellifera: application to the systemic insecticide thiamethoxam. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 82:22–31
Balieira KVB, Mazzo M, Bizerra PFV, Guimarães ARDJS, Nicodemo D, Mingatto FE (2018) Imidacloprid-induced oxidative stress in honey bees and the antioxidant action of caffeine. Apidologie 49(5):562–572
Bebe FN, Panemangalore M (2005) Pesticides and essential minerals modify endogenous antioxidants and cytochrome P450 in tissues of rats. J Environ Sci Heal B 40(5):769–784
Blacquière T, Smagghe G, Van Gestel CA, Mommaerts V (2012) Neonicotinoids in bees: a review on concentrations, side-effects and risk assessment. Ecotoxicology 21(4):973–992. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-012-0863-x
Blacquière T, van der Steen JJM (2017) Three years of banning neonicotinoid insecticides based on sub-lethal effects: can we expect to see effects on bees? Pest Manag Sci 73(7):1299–1304. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.4583
Blake R (2018) EU neonicotinoid ban removes vital tools in global fight against pests. Outlooks Pest Manag 29(5):197–200. https://doi.org/10.1564/v29_oct_02
Boily M, Sarrasin B, DeBlois C, Aras P, Chagnon M (2013) Acetylcholinesterase in honey bees (Apis mellifera) exposed to neonicotinoids, atrazine and glyphosate: laboratory and field experiments. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20(8):5603–5614
Botías C, David A, Hill EM, Goulson D (2016) Contamination of wild plants near neonicotinoid seed-treated crops, and implications for non-target insects. Sci Total Environ 566:269–278
Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248–254
Brandt A, Gorenflo A, Siede R, Meixner M, Büchler R (2016) The Neonicotinoids Thiacloprid, Imidacloprid and Clothianidin affect the immunocompetence of Honey Bees (Apis mellifera L.). J Insect Physiol 86:40–47
Brandt A, Grikscheit K, Siede R, Grosse R, Meixner MD, Büchler R (2017) Immunosuppression in honeybee queens by the neonicotinoids thiacloprid and clothianidin. Sci Rep 7:4673. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-04734-1
Brandt A, Hohnheiser B, Sgolastra F, Bosch J, Meixner MD, Büchler R (2020) Immunosuppression response to the neonicotinoid insecticide thiacloprid in females and males of the red mason bee Osmia bicornis L. Sci Rep 10(1):1–10
Carvalho SM, Belzunces LP, Carvalho GA, Brunet JL, Badiou-Beneteau A (2013) Enzymatic biomarkers as tools to assess environmental quality: a case study of exposure of the honeybee Apis mellifera to insecticides. Environ Toxicol Chem 32(9):2117–2124
Christen V, Mittner F, Fent K (2016) Molecular effects of neonicotinoids in honey bees (Apis mellifera). Environ Sci Technol 50(7):4071–4081
Čolović MB, Krstić DZ, Lazarević-Pasti TD, Bondžić AM, Vasić VM (2013) Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors: pharmacology and toxicology. Curr Neuropharmacol 11(3):315–335
Di Prisco G, Cavaliere V, Annoscia D, Varricchio P, Caprio E, Nazzi F, Gargiulo G, Pennacchio F (2013) Neonicotinoid clothianidin adversely affects insect immunity and promotes replication of a viral pathogen in honey bees. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110(46):18466–18471. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1314923110
Dussaubat C, Maisonnasse A, Crauser D, Tchamitchian S, Bonnet M, Cousin M, Kretzschmar A, Brunet J-L, Le Conte Y (2016) Combined neonicotinoid pesticide and parasite stress alter honeybee queens’ physiology and survival. Sci Rep 6:31430. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep31430
El-Gendy KS, Aly NM, Mahmoud FH, Kenawy A, El-Sebae AK (2010) The role of vitamin C as antioxidant in protection of oxidative stress induced by imidacloprid. Food Chem Toxicol 48:215–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2009.10.003
Ellman GL (1959) Tissue sulfhydryl groups. Arch Biochem Biophys 82:70–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9861(59)90090-6
Ellman GL, Courtney KD, JrV A, Featherstone RM (1961) A new rapid colorimetric determination of acetylcholinesterase activity. Biochem Pharmacol 7:88–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-2952(61)90145-9
European Commisision (2013) Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 485/2013 of 24 May 2013 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011, as regards the condition of approval of the active substances clothianidin, thiamethoxam and imidacloprid, and prohibiting the use and sale of seeds treated with plant protection products containing those active substances. OJEU L139(56):12-27
European Commission (2020) Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/23 of 13 January 2020 concerning the non-renewal of the approval of the active substance thiacloprid, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market, and amending the Annex to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011. OJEU L8(63):8-12
European Food Safety Authority (2014) Towards an integrated environmental risk assessment of multiple stressors on bees: review of research projects in Europe, knowledge gaps and recommendations. EFSA J 12:3594
European Food Safety Authority (2015) Horizon 2020: EFSA’s priority research topics. EFSA supporting publication 2015, EN-0727
FAO, IZSLT, Apimondia, CAAS (2021) Good beekeeping practices for sustainable apiculture. FAO Animal Production and Health Guidelines No. 25. Rome. https://doi.org/10.4060/cb5353en
Gauthier M, Aras P, Paquin J, Boily M (2018) Chronic exposure to imidacloprid or thiamethoxam neonicotinoid causes oxidative damages and alters carotenoid-retinoid levels in caged honey bees (Apis mellifera). Sci Rep 8(1):1–11
González-Santoyo I, Córdoba-Aguilar A (2012) Phenoloxidase: a key component of the insect immune system. Entomol Exp Appl 142:1–16
Goulson D (2013) An overview of the environmental risks posed by neonicotinoid insecticides. J Appl Ecol 50(4):977–987
Habig WH, Pabst MJ, Jakoby WB (1974) Glutathione S-transferases. J Biol Chem 249:7130–7139
Hartfelder K, Bitondi MMG; Brent CS, Guidugli-Lazzarini KR, Simões ZLP, Stabentheiner A, Tanaka ED, Wang Y (2013) Standard methods for physiology and biochemistry research in Apis mellifera. In: Dietemann V, Ellis JD, Neumann P (eds) The COLOSS BEEBOOK, Vol. I: standard methods for Apis mellifera research. J Apic Res 52. https://doi.org/10.3896/IBRA.1.52.1.06
Humann-Guilleminot S, Binkowski ŁJ, Jenni L, Hilke G, Glauser G, Helfenstein F (2019) A nation-wide survey of neonicotinoid insecticides in agricultural land with implications for agri-environment schemes. J Appl Ecol 56(7):1502–1514. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13392
Jacques A, Laurent M, Epilobee Consortium, Ribière-Chabert M, Saussac M, Bougeard S, Budge GE, Hendrikx P, Chauzat M-P (2017) A pan-European epidemiological study reveals honey bee colony survival depends on beekeeper education and disease control. PLoS ONE 12(3):e0172591
Jeschke P, Nauen R, Schindler M, Elbert A (2011) Overview of the status and global strategy for neonicotinoids. J Agric Food Chem 59(7):2897–2908
Khalifa SA, Elshafiey EH, Shetaia AA, El-Wahed AAA, Algethami AF, Musharraf SG, AlAjmi MF, Zhao C, Masry SHD, Abdel-Daim MM, Halabi MF, Kai G, Naggar YA, Bishr M, Diab MAM, El-Seedi HR (2021) Overview of bee pollination and its economic value for crop production. Insects 12(8):688. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12080688
Kojić DK, Purać JS, Nikolić TV, Orčić SM, Vujanović D, Ilijević K, Vukašinović EL, Blagojević DP (2019) Oxidative stress and the activity of antioxidative defense enzymes in overwintering honey bees. Entomol Gen 39(1):33–44. https://doi.org/10.1127/entomologia/2019/0743
Krupke CH, Hunt GJ, Eitzer BD, Andino G, Given K (2012) Multiple routes of pesticide exposure for honey bees living near agricultural fields. PLoS ONE 7(1):e29268
Laughton AM, Siva-Jothy MT (2011) A standardised protocol for measuring phenoloxidase and prophenoloxidase in the honey bee, Apis mellifera. Apidologie 45:140–149
Li Z, Li M, He J, Zhai X, Chaimanee V, Huang W-F, Nie H, Zhao Y, Su S (2017) Differential physiological effects of neonicotinoid insecticides on honey bees: a comparison between Apis mellifera and Apis cerana. Pestic Biochem Phys 140:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pestbp.2017.06.010
Liu S, Zheng Z, Wei F, Ren Y, Gui W, Wu H, Zhu G (2010) Simultaneous determination of seven neonicotinoid pesticide residues in food by ultraperformance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. J Agric Food Chem 58(6):3271–3278. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf904045j
López-Fernández O, Rial-Otero R, Simal-Gándara J (2015) High-throughput HPLC–MS/MS determination of the persistence of neonicotinoid insecticide residues of regulatory interest in dietary bee pollen. Anal Bioanal Chem 407(23):7101–7110
McCord JM, Fridovich I (1968) The reduction of cytochrome c by milk xanthine oxidase. J Biol Chem 243:5753–5760
Medrzycki P, Giffard H, Aupinel P, Belzunces LP, Chauzat M-P, Claßen C. et al. (2013) Standard methods for toxicology research in Apis mellifera. In: Dietemann V, Ellis JD, Neumann P (eds) The COLOSS BEEBOOK, Vol. I: standard methods for Apis mellifera research. J Apic Res 52. https://doi.org/10.3896/IBRA.1.52.4.14
Mullin CA, Frazier M, Frazier JL, Ashcraft S, Simonds R, VanEngelsdorp D, Pettis JS (2010) High levels of miticides and agrochemicals in North American apiaries: implications for honey bee health. PLoS ONE 5(3):e9754
Nakhleh J, El Moussawi L, Osta MA (2017) The melanization response in insect immunity. Adv Insect Phys 52:83–109
Olgun T, Dayioğlu M, Taşkiran NÖ (2020) Pesticide and pathogen induced oxidative stress in honey bees (Apis mellifera L.). Mellifera 20(2):32–52
Pham LN, Schneider DS (2008) Evidence for specificity and memory in the insect innate immune response. In: Beckage N (ed) Insect Immunology. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 97–128
Potts SG, Biesmeijer JC, Kremen C, Neumann P, Schweiger O, Kunin WE (2010) Global pollinator declines: trends, impacts and drivers. Trends Ecol Evol 25(6):345–353
Ruschioni S, Riolo P, Minuz RL, Stefano M, Cannella M, Porrini C, Isidoro N (2013) Biomonitoring with honeybees of heavy metals and pesticides in nature reserves of the marche region (Italy). Biol Trace Elem Res 154:226–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-013-9732-6
Samson-Robert O, Labrie G, Mercier P-L, Chagnon M, Derome N, Fournier V (2015) Increased acetylcholinesterase expression in bumble bees during neonicotinoid-coated corn sowing. Sci Rep 5:12636. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep12636
Siede R, Faust L, Meixner MD, Maus C, Grünewald B, Büchler R (2017) Performance of honey bee colonies under a long-lasting dietary exposure to sublethal concentrations of the neonicotinoid insecticide thiacloprid. Pest Manag Sci 73:1334–1344. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.4547
Slater TF (1984) Overview of methods used for detecting lipid peroxidation. Meth Enzymol 105:283–293
Tomizawa M, Casida JE (2005) Neonicotinoid insecticide toxicology: mechanisms of selective action. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 45:247–268
Tosi S, Nieh JC, Sgolastra F, Cabbri R, Medrzycki P (2017) Neonicotinoid pesticides and nutritional stress synergistically reduce survival in honey bees. Proc R Soc B 284:20171711
United States Environmental Protection Agency (1991) OPP Pesticide Ecotoxicity Database. https://ecotox.ipmcenters.org/. Accessed 20 Dec 2021
van Engelsdorp D, Meixner MD (2010) A historical review of managed honey bee populations in Europe and the United States and the factors that may affect them. J Invertebr Pathol 103:S80–S95
Vidau C, Diogon M, Aufauvre J, Fontbonne R, Viguès B, Brunet J-L, Texier C, Biron DG, Blot N, El Alaoui H, Belzunces LP, Delbac F (2011) Exposure to sublethal doses of fipronil and thiacloprid highly increases mortality of honeybees previously infected by Nosema ceranae. PLoS ONE 6(6):e21550. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021550
Williams GR, Troxler A, Retschnig G, Roth K, Yañez O, Shutler D, Neumann P, Gauthier L (2015) Neonicotinoid pesticides severely affect honey bee queens. Sci Rep 5:14624. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep14621
Wintermantel D, Odoux JF, Decourtye A, Henry M, Allier F, Bretagnolle V (2020) Neonicotinoid-induced mortality risk for bees foraging on oilseed rape nectar persists despite EU moratorium. Sci Total Environ 704:135400
Woodcock BA, Bullock JM, Shore RF, Heard MS, Pereira MG, Redhead J, Ridding L, Dean H, Sleep D, Henrys P, Peyton J, Hulmes S, Hulmes L, Sárospataki M, Saure C, Edwards M, Genersch E, Knäbe S, Pywell RF (2017) Country-specific effects of neonicotinoid pesticides on honey bees and wild bees. Science 356(6345):1393–1395. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa1190
Wu JY, Anelli CM, Sheppard WS (2011) Sub-lethal effects of pesticide residues in brood comb on worker honey bee (Apis mellifera) development and longevity. PLoS ONE 6(2):e14720
Yao P, Chen X, Yan Y, Liu F, Zhang Y, Guo X, Xu B (2014) Glutaredoxin 1, glutaredoxin 2, thioredoxin 1, and thioredoxin peroxidase 3 play important roles in antioxidant defense in Apis cerana cerana. Free Radic Biol Med 68:335–346
Yao J, Zhu YC, Adamczyk J (2018) Responses of honey bees to lethal and sublethal doses of formulated clothianidin alone and mixtures. J Econ Entomol 111(4):1517–1525
Zhu YC, Yao J, Adamczyk J, Luttrell R (2017) Synergistic toxicity and physiological impact of imidacloprid alone and binary mixtures with seven representative pesticides on honey bee (Apis mellifera). PLoS ONE 12(5):e0176837
Acknowledgements
The authors are thankful to Dr. Pavle Jovanov for providing pesticide analytical standards and valuable suggestions during the planning this research work.
Funding
This study was financially supported by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia, Grant No. 451–03-68/2022–14/200125.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
DKK and JSP designed the study; DKK, TVČ, and SMO performed lab work and experimental analysis; DKK wrote the manuscript with contribution from JSP, SMO, and ELV. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Manuscript editor: Mathieu Lihoreau
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Orčić, S.M., Čelić, T.V., Purać, J.S. et al. Acute toxicity of sublethal concentrations of thiacloprid and clothianidin to immune response and oxidative status of honey bees. Apidologie 53, 50 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13592-022-00959-w
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13592-022-00959-w