Abstract
In this research, the removal of levulinic acid from aqueous solutions was examined by using clay nano-adsorbents, namely montmorillonite and Cloisite 20A. The batch adsorption experiments were exerted at a different contact time (30–210 min), initial levulinic acid concentrations (20–100 g L−1), adsorbent amounts (0.05–0.25 g), and temperatures (25–45 °C). The equilibrium, kinetic, and thermodynamic data were obtained by using the adsorption capacities of clay nano-adsorbents. It was found that Cloisite 20A exhibited a higher adsorption capacity than montmorillonite. Different adsorption isotherm and kinetic models were utilized to explain the adsorption mechanism and the parameters of these models were determined. Moreover, the thermodynamic analysis was performed to express the adsorption process. For the adsorption of levulinic acid on both clay nano-adsorbents, the adsorption equilibrium data were well represented by the Freundlich isotherm model and the adsorption kinetic data were well characterized by the pseudo-second-order kinetic model for the removal of levulinic acid by two clay nano-adsorbents.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Levulinic acid contains a ketone carbonyl group and an acidic carboxyl group and it is called as keto acid. Levulinic acid is a remarkable versatile acid with a wide range of uses in various areas. It is utilized as a coating material, antifreeze, plasticizer, solvent, stabilizer, food flavoring, and animal feed. Furthermore, it has many uses in the polymer, coating, printing, textile, and pharmaceutical industries as well as in the manufacturing of nylon and rubber, glass-like synthetic fibers and resins, and hydraulic brake fluids [1].
Levulinic acid is mostly produced by the hydrothermal degradation of carbohydrate-containing materials. Firstly, the carbohydrate source is hydrolyzed to form hydroxymethyl furfural in the presence of diluted mineral acid. In the next stage, hydroxymethyl furfural is hydrolyzed and levulinic acid occurs. Furthermore, by-products can form during this process and acid production efficiency decreases with by-product formation. So, the cost and complexity of the acid purification and recovery process increase [1]. Thereby, the by-products require to be removed from the final product. However, levulinic acid can be also produced by fermentation of sucrose that is a biotechnological production method of great importance, and it is obtained in the form of aqueous solutions during the fermentation [2, 3]. The obtained acid should be removed from the water to carry out the fermentation process continuously [4]. The purification step of the manufacturing process is important to decrease the production costs and increase energy efficiency and improve economic performance and environmental impact [5, 6]. Hence, it is substantial to remove and purify levulinic acid during the manufacturing processes as well as from aqueous media or wastewater formed in the use of the chemical industries.
A lot of separation techniques, including extraction, adsorption, ion-exchange, precipitation, ultrafiltration, nanofiltration, electrodialysis, reverse osmosis, membrane separation, and distillation have been extensively employed to remove carboxylic acids from water [7,8,9]. Among these techniques, extraction [10], nanofiltration and electrodialysis [11], and adsorption [12, 13] have been employed to remove levulinic acid from aqueous solutions. Adsorption is an effective process, because it has substantial features, like high separation efficiency, quick response, simplicity, absence of sludge, low instrumentation and operation costs, and applicability of diverse adsorbents [14, 15].
Various adsorbents such as activated carbon [16], Amberlite XAD-4 [12], Amberlite IRA-67 [17], basic polymeric adsorbents (335 resin, D301, D315) [13, 18, 19], and microporous hyper-cross-linked polymers [20, 21] have been investigated in the adsorption of levulinic acid. It is noted that the adsorption studies of levulinic acid were limited. Recently, the usage of nano-adsorbents in adsorption processes has gained importance since they exhibit better adsorption properties [22]. Especially, there is a growing demand for testing nano-adsorbents in the removal of organic compounds from aqueous solutions. Clays are natural, environmentally friendly substances with a high specific surface area and are extensively preferred for the adsorption and removal of various substances [23, 24]. Besides, they have a low-cost compared with conventional adsorbents. The most commonly used clay as nano-adsorbent is montmorillonite. Montmorillonite is a kind of clay material that is abundant in nature [25]. Nano-adsorbent Cloisite 20A clay is montmorillonite modified by adding quaternary ammonium salts. Based on these properties of clays, in this study, montmorillonite and Cloisite 20A clays are considered as novel adsorbents for the uptake of levulinic acid from aqueous solutions because montmorillonite and Cloisite 20A (modified montmorillonite) as clay nano-adsorbents have not been examined in levulinic acid adsorption so far. Hence, in this adsorption research, clay nano-adsorbents were tested and compared for the adsorption of levulinic acid. For this purpose, the effects of various adsorption factors like contact time, initial acid concentration, adsorbent amount, and temperature were investigated. So, the equilibrium, kinetic, and thermodynamic data were obtained to characterize the adsorption process.
2 Materials and method
Aqueous acid solutions with different concentrations were prepared by dissolution of levulinic acid (> 98%) in distilled water. Levulinic acid was supplied from ACROS Organics. Montmorillonite (98%) and Cloisite 20A (> 97%) were obtained from Southern Clay Products (Texas, U.S.A.). Montmorillonite is a hydrated aluminum silicate with sodium as the dominant cation exchanger. Cloisite 20A is montmorillonite modified by adding dimethyl dihydrogenated tallow quaternary ammonium chloride. Tallow is derived from beef and is mainly consists of 18 carbon chains (approximately 65% C18, 30% C16, and 5% C14). Hydrogenated tallow is obtained from tallow by the hydrogenation of double bonds. Cloisite 20A consists of 2 tallow groups; hence, it is more hydrophobic [26]. The clays were used without further treatment. The main characteristic properties of clays provided by the supplier were also summarized in Table 1. The operating ranges of adsorption parameters such as initial acid concentration, adsorbent amounts, and temperature were determined from the preliminary experiments. So, batch adsorption experiments were exerted by shaking glass Erlenmeyer flasks containing 5 mL levulinic acid solutions (concentrations of 20–100 g L−1) and adsorbents (amounts of 0.05–0.25 g) in a water bath for the determined equilibrium time (180 min) at different temperatures (25–45 °C). The rate of shaker (Nüve ST 30) was 150 rpm. After adsorption operation, the samples were filtered and the adsorbents were separated from the aqueous solutions by utilizing the filtration procedure. The levulinic acid concentrations before and after the adsorption operation were detected by using SI Analytics automatic titrator using 0.1 N NaOH.
Adsorption capacity (qe, mg g−1) of adsorbents at equilibrium for levulinic acid adsorption were calculated from the following Eq. (1):
where C0 signifies the initial acid concentration (mg L−1); Ce denotes the equilibrium acid concentration (mg L−1); V represents the volume of solution (L); and M symbolizes the quantity of adsorbents (g).
3 Results and discussion
3.1 Determination of equilibrium adsorption time
To determine the equilibrium time, the batch experiments were exerted using an initial concentration of levulinic acid solution of 100 g L−1 and a clay amount of 0.05 g. Figure 1 shows the variation of levulinic acid adsorption over time for both adsorbents. As can be observed from Fig. 1, the levulinic acid adsorption increased as time increased in the initial stages; then, the adsorption slowed until equilibrium was attained because, initially, adsorption is quick owing to the free adsorption zones on the adsorbent surface. The adsorption then slows down because of the reduction in the number of adsorption sites present. Considering the values of the adsorption capacity of both adsorbents depicted in Fig. 1, it was seen that the adsorption had reached the equilibrium between 150 and 180 min. So, the equilibrium adsorption time was determined as 180 min.
3.2 The effect of initial acid concentration
In order to examine the effect of initial acid concentration on adsorption, the experiments were exerted using five concentrations of levulinic acid of about 20, 40, 60, 80, and 100 g L−1 with the period of equilibrium adsorption time at 25 °C. The adsorbent amount utilized was 0.05 g. The results of these experiments were plotted in Fig. 2. When Fig. 2 was examined, it can be seen that the values of adsorption capacity increased from 152.70 to 355.69 mg g−1 for montmorillonite and from 185.99 to 428.63 mg g−1 for Cloisite 20A with the increasing the levulinic acid concentration. Uslu et al. [17] separated levulinic acid from its aqueous solutions by Amberlite IRA-67 and they also found that the adsorption capacity increased with the increased concentration of acid. Similarly, Datta and Uslu [12] investigated the levulinic acid adsorption with Amberlite XAD-4. They reported that the values of adsorption capacity increased with an increase in the initial concentration of levulinic acid in the solution.
3.3 Effect of adsorbent amount
The effect of the adsorbent amount was examined by using various amounts varied between 0.05 and 0.25 g at the initial acid concentration of 100 g L−1 at 25 °C. The effect of adsorbent amount on the adsorption capacity for levulinic acid was depicted in Fig. 3. It was seen from Fig. 3 that the values of adsorption capacity decreased with the increase in the amount of nano-adsorbents. The maximum adsorption capacity values were obtained as 428.63 mg g−1 for Cloisite 20A and 355.69 mg g−1 for montmorillonite in case of using an amount of 0.05 g.
3.4 Effect of temperature
To observe the effect of temperature on levulinic acid adsorption by montmorillonite and Cloisite 20A, the experiments were exerted at three dissimilar temperatures (25, 35, and 45 °C). The initial levulinic acid concentration of about 100 g L−1 and the adsorbent amount of 0.05 g were used. The acquired results were demonstrated in Fig. 4. As can be seen from Fig. 4, the values of adsorption capacity were decreased with an increase in temperature, and the trends were obtained as same for both adsorbents. It was clear from these results that the adsorption of levulinic acid by montmorillonite and Cloisite 20A was exothermic. This result was confirmed by observations from similar studies of levulinic acid [12, 17].
3.5 Equilibrium adsorption models
The equilibrium data were appraised by utilizing the adsorption isotherm models including Langmuir, Freundlich, and Temkin isotherm models. The isotherm models and equations were given in Table 2 [27, 28].
Figures 5 and 6 show the linear plots of Langmuir, Freundlich, and Temkin isotherm models for levulinic acid adsorption by montmorillonite and Cloisite 20A, respectively. Table 3 indicates Langmuir, Freundlich, and Temkin isotherm model parameters and regression coefficients calculated from these illustrated linear plots. When the values of regression coefficients given in Table 3 were examined, the Freundlich isotherm model exhibited the best fit to the equilibrium adsorption data of both adsorbents. The Freundlich isotherm model approach assumes that the adsorption occurs multilayer on the adsorbent surface and implies that the adsorbent surface is heterogeneous [22].
3.6 Adsorption kinetic models
The adsorption kinetic of levulinic acid by montmorillonite and Cloisite 20A were examined by utilizing three kinetic models including pseudo-first-order, pseudo-second-order, and Elovich kinetic models. The kinetic models and equations were given in Table 4 [29, 30]. The kinetic experiments were actualized at different contact time intervals (30–180 min) with initial levulinic acid concentration of 100 g L−1, nano-clay amount of 0.05 g, and temperature of 25 °C.
Figures 7 and 8 demonstrate the linear plots of pseudo-first-order, pseudo-second-order, and Elovich kinetic models for levulinic acid adsorption by montmorillonite and Cloisite 20A, respectively. Table 5 shows the kinetic model parameters and regression coefficients calculated from these depicted linear plots. When the values of the regression coefficient shown in Table 5 were analyzed, the pseudo-second-order kinetic model exhibited the best fit to the kinetic adsorption data for both adsorbents. Pseudo-second-order kinetic model implies that the adsorption mechanism depends on the adsorbent and adsorbate [31, 32].
3.7 Adsorption thermodynamic
To investigate levulinic acid adsorption thermodynamic, three different temperatures (25, 35, and 45 °C) were studied at the initial levulinic acid concentration of 100 g L−1 and adsorbent amount of 0.05 g. The thermodynamic parameters including Gibb’s free energy (ΔG0), enthalpy (ΔH0), and entropy (ΔS0) were determined. ΔG0, ΔH0, and ΔS0 were calculated by means of equations given in Table 6 [33, 34].
Figure 9 shows the linear plots of \( \ln \left({K}_D\right)\ \mathrm{vs}.\kern0.5em \frac{1\ }{T} \) for levulinic acid adsorption by montmorillonite and Cloisite 20A. Table 7 shows thermodynamic parameters (ΔS0 and ΔH0) calculated from the intercept and slope of linear plots. As can be seen from Table 7, the adsorption of levulinic acid was exothermic (ΔH0 < 0) for both nano-adsorbents. It was also found ΔS0 < 0 indicating that there was a decreased randomness at the adsorbent-adsorbate interface during the adsorption process [34]. In addition, the values of ΔG0 based on different temperatures were obtained as shown in Table 8. ΔG0 < 0 implies that adsorption is spontaneous and favorable [34]. Thus, the adsorption of levulinic acid by montmorillonite and Cloisite 20A occurs spontaneously and it is favorable (Cloisite 20A > montmorillonite).
3.8 Comparison of adsorption capacities
The abovementioned studies indicated that Cloisite 20A (modified montmorillonite) exhibited a higher selectivity and adsorption capacity than montmorillonite. The difference in the adsorption performance of absorbents can be attributed to the differences in the surface features of the adsorbents. This conclusion has proved that a surface modifier has a significant impact on the adsorption capacity. The modified montmorillonite surface is preferred due to the presence of quaternary ammonium chloride (cationic compound containing alkyl groups in long carbon chains) compared with the unmodified montmorillonite surface and also modified montmorillonite is more hydrophobic [33]. A clay mineral predominantly performs the adsorption with a cation exchange mechanism. The cations can be bonded with electrostatic forces into the surface of adsorbents [15]. In this context, the adsorption phenomenon of levulinic acid onto clays may be explained by the cation exchange mechanism. Table 9 demonstrates a comparison of the adsorption capacity of nano-adsorbents in the present study with the values of the adsorption capacity of various adsorbents reported in the literature for levulinic acid. As shown in Table 9, the adsorption capacity value obtained in this study was quite high compared with other reported capacity values. These results confirmed that montmorillonite and Cloisite 20A are efficient nano-adsorbents for the removal of levulinic acid from aqueous solutions.
4 Conclusion
The levulinic acid adsorption was tested by utilizing montmorillonite and Cloisite 20A (modified montmorillonite). It was found that these clay nano-adsorbents were effective for the removal of levulinic acid from aqueous solutions. It was also obtained that nano-clay Cloisite 20A exhibited a higher selectivity and adsorption capacity than montmorillonite. The equilibrium, kinetic, and thermodynamic studies were carried out for both adsorbents by investigating the effect of time, acid concentration, and temperature on the adsorption process. The adsorption capacities of adsorbents were increased as the initial levulinic acid concentration increased. The maximum adsorption capacities obtained 428.63 mg g−1 for Cloisite 20A and 355.69 mg g−1 for montmorillonite. The optimal adsorption operating conditions were determined as the contact adsorption time of 180 min, initial levulinic acid concentration of 100 g L−1, the amount of adsorbent of 0.05 g, and the temperature of 25 °C. The equilibrium data for two adsorbents were best described by the Freundlich isotherm model, demonstrating the multilayer adsorption process. The kinetic data showed a good fit by the pseudo-second-order kinetic model for two adsorbents. From the thermodynamic analysis, the adsorption of levulinic acid on the clay nano-adsorbents was found to be exothermic process. This study indicated that these clay nano-adsorbents are effective and can be used in the removal of levulinic acid from aqueous solutions. Besides, this study has suggested that these adsorbents can be used for the removal of other organic acids from the fermentation broths or mixture or waste solutions.
References
Baylan N, Çehreli S (2018) Ionic liquids as bulk liquid membranes on levulinic acid removal: a design study. J Mol Liq 266:299–308
Caballero B, Trugo LC, Finglas PM (2003) Encyclopedia of food sciences and nutrition. Academic .
Guad R, Surana S, Talele G, Talele MS, Gokhale MS (2006) Natural excipients. Pragati Books Pvt. Ltd.
Kumar S, Babu B (2008) Process intensification for separation of carboxylic acids from fermentation broths using reactive extraction. J Fut Eng Technol 3:19–26
Datta D, Marti ME, Pal D, Kumar S (2017) Equilibrium study on the extraction of levulinic acid from aqueous solution with Aliquat 336 dissolved in different diluents: Ssolvent’s polarity effect and column design. J Chem Eng Data 62:3–10
Long NVD, Lee M (2016) Design and optimization of the levulinic acid recovery process from lignocellulosic biomass. Chem Eng Res Des 107:126–136
İnci I, Aydın A (2003) Extraction of hydroxycarboxylic acids with MIBK/Toluene solutions of amines. J Sci Ind Res 62(9):926–930
Aşçı YS, Dramur U, Bilgin M (2017) Investigation of the separation of carboxylic acids from aqueous solutions using a pilot scale membrane unit. J Mol Liq 248:391–398
Lalikoğlu M, Gök A, Gök MK, Aşçı YS (2015) Investigation of lactic acid separation by layered double hydroxide: equilibrium, kinetics, and thermodynamics. J Chem Eng Data 60:3159–3165
Brouwer T, Blahusiak M, Babic K, Schuur B (2017) Reactive extraction and recovery of levulinic acid, formic acid and furfural from aqueous solutions containing sulphuric acid. Sep Purif Technol 185:186–195
Kim JH, Na J-G, Yang J-W, Chang YK (2013) Separation of galactose, 5-hydroxymethylfurfural and levulinic acid in acid hydrolysate of agarose by nanofiltration and electrodialysis. Bioresour Technol 140:64–72
Datta D, Uslu H (2017) Adsorption of levulinic acid from aqueous solution by Amberlite XAD-4. J Mol Liq 234:330–334
Liu B-J, Hu Z-J, Ren Q-L (2009) Single-component and competitive adsorption of levulinic/formic acids on basic polymeric adsorbents. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 339:185–191
Awual MR, Eldesoky GE, Yaita T, Naushad M, Shiwaku H, AlOthman ZA, Suzuki S (2015) Schiff based ligand containing nano-composite adsorbent for optical copper (II) ions removal from aqueous solutions. Chem Eng J 279:639–647
Baylan N, Meriçboyu AE (2016) Adsorption of lead and copper on bentonite and grapeseed activated carbon in single-and binary-ion systems. Sep Sci Technol 51:2360–2368
Liu BJ, Liu SW, Liu TB, Mao JW (2012) Advanced Materials Research. Trans Tech Publ 1691–1695
Uslu H, Datta D, Santos D, Öztürk M (2019) Separation of levulinic acid using polymeric resin, Amberlite IRA-67. J Chem Eng Data 64:3044–3049
Liu B-J, Ren Q-L (2006) Sorption of levulinic acid onto weakly basic anion exchangers: equilibrium and kinetic studies. J Colloid Interface Sci 294:281–287
Liu B, Liu S (2011) Adsorption of levulinic acid from aqueous solution onto basic polymeric adsorbent: experimental and modeling studies. Sep Sci Technol 46:2391–2399
Lin X, Huang Q, Qi G, Xiong L, Huang C, Chen X, Li H, Chen X (2017) Adsorption behavior of levulinic acid onto microporous hyper-cross-linked polymers in aqueous solution: equilibrium, thermodynamic, kinetic simulation and fixed-bed column studies. Chemosphere 171:231–239
Lin X, Huang Q, Qi G, Shi S, Xiong L, Huang C, Chen X, Li H, Chen X (2017) Estimation of fixed-bed column parameters and mathematical modeling of breakthrough behaviors for adsorption of levulinic acid from aqueous solution using SY-01 resin. Sep Purif Technol 174:222–231
Bhatia D, Datta D, Joshi A, Gupta S, Gote Y (2019) Adsorption of isonicotinic acid from aqueous solution using multi-walled carbon nanotubes/Fe3O4. J Mol Liq 276:163–169
Kyzas GZ, Matis KA (2015) Nanoadsorbents for pollutants removal: a review. J Mol Liq 203:159–168
Liu P, Zhang L (2007) Adsorption of dyes from aqueous solutions or suspensions with clay nano-adsorbents. Sep Purif Technol 58:32–39
Hassani A, Kiranşan M, Soltani RDC, Khataee A, Karaca S (2015) Optimization of the adsorption of a textile dye onto nanoclay using a central composite design. Turk J Chem 39:734–749
Kumar P, Sandeep K, Alavi S, Truong V, Gorga R (2010) Effect of type and content of modified montmorillonite on the structure and properties of bio-nanocomposite films based on soy protein isolate and montmorillonite. J Food Sci 75:N46–N56
Mahmoodi NM, Hayati B, Arami M, Lan C (2011) Adsorption of textile dyes on pine cone from colored wastewater: kinetic, equilibrium and thermodynamic studies. Desalination 268:117–125
Yusan S, Gok C, Erenturk S, Aytas S (2012) Adsorptive removal of thorium (IV) using calcined and flux calcined diatomite from Turkey: evaluation of equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamic data. Appl Clay Sci 67:106–116
Yang X, Al-Duri B (2005) Kinetic modeling of liquid-phase adsorption of reactive dyes on activated carbon. J Colloid Interface Sci 287:25–34
Yeddou N, Bensmaili A (2005) Kinetic models for the sorption of dye from aqueous solution by clay-wood sawdust mixture. Desalination 185:499–508
Meroufel B, Benali O, Benyahia M, Benmoussa Y, Zenasni M (2013) Adsorptive removal of anionic dye from aqueous solutions by Algerian kaolin: characteristics, isotherm, kinetic and thermodynamic studies. J Mater Environ Sci 4:482–491
Pavan FA, Dias SL, Lima EC, Benvenutti EV (2008) Removal of Congo red from aqueous solution by anilinepropylsilica xerogel. Dyes Pigments 76:64–69
Freitas A, Mendes M, Coelho G (2007) Thermodynamic study of fatty acids adsorption on different adsorbents. J Chem Thermodyn 39:1027–1037
Pradhan N, Rene E, Lens P, Dipasquale L, D’Ippolito G, Fontana A, Panico A, Esposito G (2017) Adsorption behaviour of lactic acid on granular activated carbon and anionic resins: thermodynamics, isotherms and kinetic studies. Energies 10:665
Çelebican Ö, İnci İ, Baylan N (2020) Investigation of adsorption properties of levulinic acid by a nanotechnological material. J Mol Struct 1203:127454
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Baylan, N. Removal of levulinic acid from aqueous solutions by clay nano-adsorbents: equilibrium, kinetic, and thermodynamic data. Biomass Conv. Bioref. 10, 1291–1300 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-00744-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-00744-8