Abstract
Transforming growth factor β1 (TGF-β1) is a multifunctional cytokine that plays important roles in cervical tumor formation, invasion, progression, and metastasis. TGF-β1 functions as a tumor inhibitor in precancerous lesions and early stage cancers of cervix whereas as a tumor promoter in later stage. This switch from a tumor inhibitor to a tumor promoter might be due to various alterations in TGF-β signaling pathway, such as mutations or loss of expression of TGF-β receptors and SMAD proteins. Additionally, the oncoproteins of human papillomaviruses have been shown to stimulate TGF-β1 expression, which in turn suppresses host immune surveillance. Thus, in addition to driving tumor cell migration and metastasis, TGF-β1 is believed to play a key role in promoting human papillomavirus infection by weakening host immune defense. In this article, we will discuss the role of TGF-β1 in the expression, carcinogenesis, progression, and therapy in cervical cancers. A better understanding of this cytokine in cervical carcinogenesis is essential for critical evaluation of this cytokine as a potential prognostic marker and therapeutic target.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Cervical cancer, the third most frequent cancer and the fourth leading cause of cancer death among women worldwide, accounts for nearly 10 % of the total newly diagnosed cancer cases and 8 % of the total cancer deaths [1]. Although high risk human papillomavirus (HPV) is considered as a major etiologic agent for cervical cancer, only a small number of women exposed to this virus develop cancer, implying that other risk factors should be considered [2]. Molecular alterations of tumor suppressor genes and/or oncogenes play a pivotal role in the development of cervical cancer. Since its discovery in the early 1980s, transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) has emerged as a family of growth factors involved in essential physiological processes, including cell proliferation, apoptosis, differentiation, cell motility, angiogenesis, extracellular matrix turnover, immunosuppression, embryonic development, and wound healing [3]. Also, TGF-β1 has been implicated in the pathogenesis of human diseases, such as cancer. It may function as either a tumor suppressor or a tumor promoter depending on the stage of the tumor [4, 5]. TGF-β1 acts as a potent tumor suppressor during early stages of carcinogenesis because of its ability to induce cell cycle arrest and apoptotic reactions [4, 5]. However, during disease progression, tumor cells escape the inhibitory effects of TGF-β and at later stages of carcinogenesis TGF-β1 exert tumor promoter activities [4, 5]. In this article, we will discuss the expression and the role of TGF-β1 in the carcinogenesis, progression, and therapy in cervical lesions. A better understanding of this cytokine in cervical carcinogenesis is essential for critical evaluation of this cytokine as a potential prognostic marker and therapeutic target.
Biology of TGF-β1
TGF-β belongs to a family of dimeric peptide growth factors including bone morphogenetic proteins, activins, and inhibins [3]. There are three mammalian isoforms of TGF-β ligand, named TGF-β1, TGF-β2, and TGF-β3 with significant homology and similarities in function [3]. TGF-β1 is expressed in epithelial, endothelial, hematopoietic, and connective tissue cells, and TGF-β2 is expressed in epithelial and neuronal cells. While TGF-β3 is expressed primarily in mesenchymal cells [6]. All three isoforms are secreted in a latent form and activated via various mechanisms [3, 4]. Active TGF-β binds to three different cell surface receptors called type I (TβRI), type II (TβRII), and type III (TβR III) receptors. TβRI and TβRII are serine/threonine kinase receptors. TGF-β ligand signals through TβRII, which recruits and phosphorylates the TβRI kinase domain. Recruitment and phosphorylation of TβRI phosphorylate intracellular SMAD2 and SMAD3, which then interact with SMAD4 protein to regulate gene expression in the nucleus [3, 4]. There are several positive and negative feedback mechanisms that control the strength of TGF-β signaling. For example, SMAD7 is stimulated by TGF-β but acts as a negative regulator of this signaling pathway through inhibition of SMAD2 and SMAD3 phosphorylation [4]. TGF-β mediates growth inhibition mainly through this SMAD-dependent pathway. In addition to this canonical signaling pathway, TGF-β binding to its receptors also activates noncanonical signaling pathways such as mitogen-activated protein kinases and the phosphoinositol-3 kinase, as well as small guanosine triphosphatase pathways. These pathways are implicated in epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), tumor cell motility, and migration [4].
Expression of TGF-β1 in cervical lesions
Although there are controversial reports indicating variations in TGF-β1 expression levels among cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) [7–9], cervical cancer [7, 10], and normal tissue specimens, most studies showed decreased TGF-β1 expression in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and increased TGF-β1 expression in cervical cancer in comparison to normal cervical tissue [7, 8, 10]. These data suggests TGF-β1 functions as a tumor inhibitor in precancerous cervical lesions and early stage cervical cancers whereas a tumor promoter in later stage tumors.
Decreased expression of TGF-β1 in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
Decreased expression of TGF-β1 protein was observed commonly in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia [11]. Lower concentrations of plasma TGF-β1 were detected in the patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia than that in normal cervical tissues [7]. Similarly, the mRNA levels of TGF-β1 also decreased in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia [12]. Furthermore, Torng et al. [13] indicated that expression of TGF-β1 decreased as tumor cells progressed from cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 1, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3, to microinvasive carcinoma.
Increased expression of TGF-β1 in cervical cancer
TGF-β1 expression was detected immunohistochemically in about 71.21 % of cervical carcinoma [10], and higher TGF-β1 plasma levels were found in cervical cancer patients compared to healthy control groups [8, 9, 14] and were shown to decrease in patients who underwent surgical resection of their tumors [15]. Additionally, compared with normal cervical tissues, RT-PCR analysis demonstrated an abnormal overexpression of TGF-β1 mRNA in cervical cancer tissues [16].
In some advanced cervical cancers, levels of TGF-β1 are positively associated with clinicopathological features such as tumor size, invasiveness, and dedifferentiation. Interestingly, Farley et al. [17] reported an increase of TGF-β1 and its receptor protein expression during malignant transformation from endocervical epithelium to adenocarcinoma, which was in contrast to findings in squamous cell carcinogenesis and raises the question whether TGF-β1 plays a different role in adenocarcinoma and in squamous cell carcinoma. However, studies comparing TGF-β expression in these two types of cancer have yielded different observations. Santin et al. [18] reported differential TGF-β secretion in adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix in vitro, which was supported by the study by Hazelbag et al. [19]. In contrast, Dickson et al. [20] found no significant difference of TGF-β-1 levels between squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma.
TGF-β1 polymorphisms with cervical cancer
Although genetic alterations of TGF-β signaling components are common in various types of cancer, mutation of TGF-β1 is uncommon in cancers including cervical cancer. Ramos-Flores et al. [21] found that the frequency of the allele A of the polymorphism G-800A was significantly elevated in cervical cancer patients compared with healthy subjects. In another study, although none of the TGF-β1−509C>T genotypes were found to be associated with increased risk of cervical cancer, TGF-β1−509T allele was found to be significantly associated with reduced risk of early stage cervical cancer, as well as the progression of late-stage cervical cancer [22] . However, no significant difference was found in the frequencies of TGF-β1 codon 10 and 25 gene polymorphisms between patients with cervical cancer and healthy women both in a Chinese and a Zimbabwe population [23, 24]. Thus, TGF-β1 polymorphism G-800A and TGF-β1−509T allele may present important genetic determinants that together contribute to risk of cervical cancer.
Roles of TGF-β1 in cervical lesions
TGF-β1 as a tumor inhibitor in early stage of cervical cancer
Markedly decreased TGF-β1 expression in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia suggested that an early event in the neoplastic transformation of cervical epithelial cells may involve the loss of TGF-β1 [11]. TGF-β1 has major tumor-suppressive properties as its primary function. It inhibits proliferation of epithelial, normal stromal, and hematopoietic cells by promoting cell cycle arrest, inducing apoptosis, autophagy, and senescence [3, 6]. Mechanisms by which TGF-β1 inhibits the growth of cervical carcinoma are complex and may include downregulation of proliferative drivers such as c-Myc and upregulation of p27Kip1 protein [25]. In vitro, TGF-β1 downregulated human papillomavirus-16 oncogene E6 and E7 levels, rescued p53 expression and Rb response pathway, and induced cellular senescence in Caski cells [26], while in Rb mutant HT-3 cells, p130, instead of Rb, mediated TGF-β-induced growth inhibition [27]. More recently, in HeLa cell, TGF-β-activated SMAD3 signaling was shown to inhibit telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) gene expression and induced G1/S phase cell cycle arrest and apoptosis [28] (Fig. 1).
TGF-β1 as a tumor promoter in later stage of cervical cancer
TGF-β1 is associated with and promotes metastatic properties
Accumulating evidence showed that TGF-β1 could promote invasion and node metastasis of cervical cancer [5]. Hagemann et al. [29] compared differential gene expression profiles between lymph node micrometastases or recurrent tumors and matched primary cervical cancers by Taqman low-density arrays and found that TGF-β1 was upregulated in lymph node micrometastases, which was further confirmed by immunohistochemistry. A recent study in cervical adenocarcinoma patients with stage Ib~IIa [10] strengthened the evidence that TGF-β1 expression was associated with depth of infiltration and lymphatic metastasis. It can induce remodeling of intratumoral stroma [30] and enhance the interaction between cervical squamous cell carcinoma cells and stromal cells such as cancer-associated fibroblasts [31]. In addition, TGF-β1 promotes tumor invasiveness through matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) induction. For example, MMP-2 and MMP-9 were upregulated in vitro by TGF-β1 [32]. Similarly, in vitro, TGF-β1 treatment significantly increased the invasive behavior of cervical cancer cells [31].
TGF-β1 promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition
TGF-β1 is a major regulator of the epithelial-mesenchymal transition process, a well-known transdifferentiation program that enables epithelial cells to generate a mesenchymal phenotype [3]. It has been demonstrated that TGF-β1 stimulated epithelial-mesenchymal transition in SiHa and HeLa cells, allowing cancer cells to lose polarity and cell-cell contacts and acquiring fibroblast-like properties, which allow the cells to invade surrounding tissues and eventually metastasize [33, 34].
TGF-β1 induces angiogenesis
TGF-β1 plays a pro-tumorigenic role in cervical cancer also by promoting angiogenesis. TGF-β1 can induce angiogenic factors such as vascular endothelial growth factor in cervical epithelial cells. Moon et al. [35] showed that the serum TGF-β1 levels were positively related to the serum vascular endothelial growth factor levels in the cervical cancer patients. Similarly, research by Baritaki et al. [36] revealed a co-expression pattern for vascular endothelial growth factor and TGF-β1 mRNAs in Pap smears in normal cervix and low-grade squamous cervical intraepithelial lesions. In addition, TGF-β1 was shown to facilitate the proliferation of human umbilical vein endothelial cells induced by human papillomavirus-positive epithelial cells [37].
TGF-β1 induces the escape from immune surveillance
A growing number of studies suggest immunoregulation may play an important role in cervical cancer carcinogenesis. TGF-β1 is a potent immunosuppressor and plays a crucial role in the escape of cancer cells from immune surveillance [38]. TGF-β1 inhibited T cell proliferation and CD3zeta expression, which was found essential in T cell activation in cervical cancer patients [39]. TGF-β secreted in vitro by cervical cancer cells inhibited the proliferation of CD4+ lymphocytes and induced them to undergo apoptosis [40]. It also drove the upregulation of CD94+/NKG2A+ cells within the CD8+ CTLs and thus diminished their antitumor effect in the cancer milieu [41]. In addition to impairing T cell effector function, TGF-β is also a potent inducer of regulatory T cells (Tregs), which inhibits the functions of effector T cell [14]. Overall, TGF-β1 generates an immunosuppressive state in the microenvironment of the cervix, especially infected with human papillomavirus, and TGF-β1 inhibition may contribute to restoring anti-tumoral cytotoxic immune response.
Together, these data suggest that TGF-β1 promotes tumor progression by promoting epithelial-mesenchymal transition, cell motility, invasion, and inducing angiogenesis, as well as escaping from host immune surveillance in cervical carcinogenesis (Fig. 1).
Alteration of TGF-β1 pathways in cervical cancer
As alluded above, TGF-β1 can inhibit tumor cell growth in early stage of cervical cancer, but it promotes tumor cell growth and progression at late stages. The molecular mechanism of this TGF-β1 paradox remains largely unexplained. In addition to increasing amounts of TGF-β1 secreted by tumor cells, which itself serves as a pro-malignant factor by suppressing immune surveillance in the cancer host and by augmenting angiogenesis, the loss of responsiveness to TGF-β1-mediated growth inhibition in tumor cells can also contribute to tumor growth. De Gees et al. [42] compared the cells sensitivity to TGF-β1 and found that the cervical carcinoma cell lines were resistant to the growth inhibitory effects of TGF-β1, while the cervical intraepithelial neoplasia cell lines were significantly more sensitive than the carcinoma cell lines but less sensitive than normal cervical cells. Mechanisms related to TGF-β1 responsiveness are thought to be due to alterations of the core elements in TGF-β signaling pathway, the receptors, and the SMADs.
Expression and mutation of TGF-β receptor in cervical carcinogenesis
TGF-β type I receptor (TβRI) gene expression levels were decreased in cervical cancer samples in contrast with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia samples [43]. Furthermore, mutations in TβRI were described in cervical cancer. Chen et al. [44] studied 16 paraffin-embedded primary invasive cervical carcinoma specimens by polymerase chain reaction-single-strand conformation polymorphism (PCR-SSCP) and found that 7 of 16 cases were heterozygous for a G=A polymorphism in intron 7 of TβRI, 6 of 16 cases carried del (GGC) 3 TβRI variant allele, also, in one tumor, a silent A=C transversion mutation that might affect mRNA splicing was present in exon 6 of TβRI.
Mutations or loss of expression of TGF-β type II receptor (TβRII) are the most common mechanism of loss of TGF-β signaling in cervical cancer. A decreased expression of TβRII mRNA was demonstrated not only in several cervical cancer cells [45] but in human cervical cancer tissues as well [16]. Kang et al. [45] examined the expression and structural integrity of TβRII gene in a series of human cervical cancer cell lines and reported ME-180 and C-33 cell failed to express TβRII -specific RNA, which in ME-180 was due to a homozygous deletion of the entire TβRII gene. In addition, in a K14-E7 transgenic mice model, diminished expression of TβRII mRNA and protein levels in cervical cancer was also demonstrated and these levels were further decreased after estrogen treatment [46]. Furthermore, research by Chen et al. [44] found a novel G=T transversion in exon 3 of TβRII that introduced a premature stop codon (E142Stop) and presumably resulted in the synthesis of a truncated soluble exo-receptor.
On the other hand, in regard to cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), levels of TβRI and TβRII stayed the same in CIN1, CIN2, CIN3, and microinvasive carcinoma [13].
Expression and mutation of SMADs in cervical carcinogenesis
SMAD2 gene expression levels were reduced in cervical cancers [16, 43]. Also, research by Maliekal et al. [47] identified a missense mutation in the MH1 domain of SMAD2 in a cervical cancer sample and reported C-terminal of SMAD2 was deleted in human cervical cancer.
The levels of phosphorylated SMAD3 (P-SMAD3) was thought as an indicator of TGF-β signaling activity. Interestingly, Nagura et al. [31], in their study on evaluation of the expression status of TGF-β signaling-associated molecules in 67 cervical cancers, revealed that cases with tumor boundary P-SMAD3 expression were more likely to have node metastasis and stromal expression of thrombospondin-1, which were a noteworthy poor prognostic factor and an activator of TGF-β signaling, respectively. Thus, P-SMAD3 boundary staining could be an indicator not only of active TGF-β signaling but may also serve as a biomarker to predict progression of cervical cancer.
SMAD4 inactivation is one of the most common alterations in cervical cancer, caused by deletion [16, 47], mutation [47], or epigenetic modification [48]. Many studies showed that loss of SMAD4 expression correlated with a worse prognosis [48]. For instance, in a study by Kloth et al., absent nuclear SMAD4 expression was significantly associated with poor disease-free and 5-year overall survival [48]. Also, SMAD4 was negatively correlated with lymph node metastasis and infiltration depth [49]. In vitro, loss of expression and SMAD4 mutations also were found in cervical cancer cell lines [50]. Baldus et al. [51] performed an analysis of SMAD4 in 13 individual cervical cancer cell lines and detected functional inactivation of SMAD4 in four of the 13 cell lines and was due to homozygous loss of 30 exons in two of them and presumably to insertional inactivation in intron 3 in the other two. SMAD4-mediated tumor suppression in cervical cancer cells may be due to tumor cell extracellular matrix interactions [52].
SMAD7 is an important member of the SMAD family that functions as a negative feedback regulator of TGF-β responses [3]. Overexpression of SMAD7 and suppression of TGF-β signaling have been reported in endometrial carcinomas and thyroid follicular tumors [3]. However, a recent study on mutational analysis of SMAD7 exon 4 has shown no mutations or aberrations could be detected in any of the 60 cervical cancer samples [53]. Therefore, mutations of SMAD7 are unlikely to be of etiological significance as far as human cervical cancer is concerned.
Roles of TGF-β1 in human papillomavirus infection
Multiple studies have reported a higher tendency of TGF-β1 expression in human papillomavirus-positive women than human papillomavirus-negative controls [9, 43, 54]. In addition, the expression of TGF-β1 was positively correlated with human papillomavirus oncogenes expression, such as E2 and E7 [13, 55]. Blocking human papillomavirus type 16 oncogene E7 expression could lower the expression of TGF-β1 and induce cells to enter apoptosis [55]. Decreasing TGF-β expression was also observed in HeLa-sphere-forming cells when silencing the human papillomavirus oncogene E6/E7 [56]. The effects of human papillomavirus type 16 oncogenes E6 and E7 on the promoter activity of the human TGF-β1 gene in cervical tumor cell lines may be due to E6 and E7 action on one specific Sp1-binding site (Sp1e) located at positions −108 to −102 in the TGF-β1 core promoter [54].
In a feedback mechanism, TGF-β1 inhibited human papillomavirus type 16 RNA expression at the transcriptional level [57], which was mediated by a decrease in Ski levels and nuclear factor I activity [58], and exerted antiproliferative effects on these human papillomavirus-transformed cells by downregulating expression and function of different proliferation-enhancing molecules [59, 60]. Simultaneously, TGF-β1 downregulated human papillomavirus-16 oncogenes E6 and E7 levels [26], which resulted in a shifted balance (lowered activity of E6) in favor of increased p53 expression, resulting in activation of the cell cycle inhibitory gene, p21 (WAF1). This protein binds and inhibits the cyclin E/CDK2 complex that maintains Rb in a hyperphosphorylated state. Rb then shifts to a hypophosphorylated state, resulting in G1 arrest, presumably by binding E2F transcription factors [61]. Also, TGF-β1 promoted chromosomal instability in human papillomavirus type 16 oncogenes E6- and E7-infected cervical epithelial cells [62]. However, the human papillomavirus type 16 oncogenes E6 and E7 were shown to exhibit an inhibitory effect on TGF-β receptor promoter activity [63]; moreover, the human papillomavirus E7 oncoprotein inhibited TGF-β signaling in the infected cells by blocking binding of the SMAD complex to its target sequence [64]. As such, while TGF-β1 may inhibit the expression of the oncogenes of human papillomaviruses, this activity can be attenuated by the negative effects of the oncoproteins on TGF-β1 signaling pathway.
On the other hand, TGF-β1 plays an important role in generating an immunosuppressive state in the tumor microenvironment, which allows human papillomavirus to evade the host’s immune response [38]. Thus, TGF-β1 plays a key role in promoting high risk human papillomavirus infection, which may be part of mechanism of TGF-β-mediated cervical carcinogenesis in human papillomavirus-infected patients.
Clinical utilities of TGF-β1
Predictive significance of TGF-β1 in radiosensitivity and radiation therapy toxicity
TGF-β1 has been demonstrated to be a key mediator of fibrogenesis in a number of pathologic conditions, including postradiation tissue reactions [65]. Several studies have evaluated the predictive significance of TGF-β1 levels and its polymorphisms in the radiation therapy for cervical cancer (Table 1). Two recent studies reported a negative correlation between pretreatment TGF-β1 levels and radiosensitivity in cervical carcinoma [20, 66], which suggest that lowering pretreatment TGF-β1 levels should increase tumor response to radiation. With respect to radiation therapy toxicity, however, published results are conflicting. Yang et al. [66] studied 42 patients with cervical carcinoma receiving cisplatin-based chemoradiation and reported that a sudden elevation of serum TGF-β1 levels after the first brachytherapy was accompanied with increased vaginal mucositis and proctitis, suggesting that TGF-β1 may be an effective indicator of toxicity to brachytherapy. In addition, De Ruyck et al. [67] found possible associations between TGF-β1 −1552delAGG, −509C>T, and L10P polymorphisms and subsequent toxicity after radiotherapy in 78 patients treated for cervical or endometrial carcinoma. Interestingly, in a similar study, Paulikova et al. [65] found a significant association between TGF-β1 compound homozygosity (−1552delAGG, −509C>T, L10P) and subsequent toxicity after chemoradiotherapy, whereas no relationship in single TGF-β1 polymorphism in their study on 55 patients with FIGO stage IIB and higher without disease recurrence after a 6-year follow-up. However, Dickson et al. [20] suggested that pretreatment plasma TGF-β1 levels are not prognostic for the probability of developing late complications.
Taken together, these data suggest that pretreatment TGF-β1 levels in cervical cancer are a significant predictive factor for radiosensitivity but not for radiation therapy toxicity.
Prognostic significance of TGF-β1 in cervical cancer
Studies evaluating the potential of TGF-β1 for the prognosis and predictor of recurrence of patients with cervical cancer have yielded conflicting results (Table 1). Dickson et al. [20] indicated patients with elevated pretreatment plasma TGF-β1 levels had a significantly decreased local control rate and probability of survival in cervical cancer patients. Furthermore, Fan et al. [68] found that TGF-β1 expression in the vaginal margin had a close association with vaginal recurrence of stage Ib–IIa cervical cancer and was an independent prognostic marker of cervical squamous cell carcinoma. Accordingly, they also demonstrated that the expression of TGF-β1 was a significant prognostic factor for cervical adenocarcinoma and elevated TGF-β1 was associated with a short survival [10]. However, another retrospective study suggested that higher TGF-β1 expression in cervical cancer cells was not associated with worse survival and higher recurrent rates [19]. These apparently conflicting results may arise from the different techniques used to evaluate TGF-β1 alterations and differences in patient epidemiology and treatment history.
Potential role for TGF-β1 inhibitors in the treatment
Anti-TGF-β1-based therapy is being extensively evaluated as an attractive therapeutic target, especially for cancer treatment, due to its aberrant overexpression in tumors and its tumor-promoting activities. Novel drugs blocking the TGF-β pathway, including blocking production of TGF-β ligands with antisense molecules, small-molecule inhibitors of the kinase activity of TβRI and TβRII, monoclonal antibodies that block TGF-β signaling, and soluble forms of TβRII and TβRIII that function as ligand traps [6], have been developed and have shown efficacy in preclinical and clinical studies. Nonetheless, to date, none of these inhibitors have been tested in cervical cancer.
Conclusion
TGF-β1 exerts both anti-oncogenic and pro-oncogenic activities in cervical carcinogenesis. TGF-β1 functions as a tumor inhibitor in precancerous cervical lesions and early stage cervical cancers whereas a tumor promoter in later stage tumors. This switch from a tumor suppressor to a tumor promoter can be due to various alterations in TGF-β signaling pathway, such as mutations or loss of expression of TGF-β receptors and SMAD proteins. Furthermore, the metastasis-promoting activity of TGF-β1 is in part through its action in tumor microenvironment. Additionally, TGF-β1 facilitates the infection of high risk human papillomavirus, which may be part of the mechanisms of TGF-β1-driven carcinogenesis in human papillomavirus-positive cervical cancer. These tumor-promoting roles associated with TGF-β1 warrant future preclinical and clinical testing of anti-TGF-β1 therapy for the prevention and treatment of cervical cancer. Additionally, TGF-β1 may also be a mediator of radiosensitivity and a useful prognostic biomarker and predictor of recurrence after therapy.
References
Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61(2):69–90.
Jensen KE, Thomsen LT, Schmiedel S, et al. Chlamydia trachomatis and risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse in women with persistent human papillomavirus infection: a cohort study. Sex Transm Infect. 2014;90:550–5.
Katz LH, Li Y, Chen JS, et al. Targeting TGF-beta signaling in cancer. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2013;17(7):743–60.
Principe DR, Doll JA, Bauer J, et al. TGF-beta: duality of function between tumor prevention and carcinogenesis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014;106(2):djt369.
Neuzillet C, de Gramont A, Tijeras-Raballand A, et al. Perspectives of TGF-beta inhibition in pancreatic and hepatocellular carcinomas. Oncotarget. 2014;5(1):78–94.
Achyut BR, Yang L. Transforming growth factor-beta in the gastrointestinal and hepatic tumor microenvironment. Gastroenterology. 2011;141(4):1167–78.
Wu HS, Li YF, Chou CI, Yuan CC, Hung MW, Tsai LC. The concentration of serum transforming growth factor beta-1 (TGF-beta1) is decreased in cervical carcinoma patients. Cancer Invest. 2002;20(1):55–9.
Hou F, Li Z, Ma D, et al. Distribution of Th17 cells and Foxp3-expressing T cells in tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in patients with uterine cervical cancer. Clin Chim Acta. 2012;413(23-24):1848–54.
Ding AP, Zhang Y, Wei H, Luo QS, Zhang SL. Correlation study of HPV-16 existential status with Th17/Treg cytokines. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2013;93(37):2957–60.
Fan DM, Tian XY, Wang RF, Yu JJ. The prognosis significance of TGF-beta1 and ER protein in cervical adenocarcinoma patients with stage Ib~IIa. Tumour Biol. 2014;35(11):11237–42.
Comerci Jr JT, Runowicz CD, Flanders KC, et al. Altered expression of transforming growth factor-beta 1 in cervical neoplasia as an early biomarker in carcinogenesis of the uterine cervix. Cancer. 1996;77(6):1107–14.
El-Sherif AM, Seth R, Tighe PJ, Jenkins D. Decreased synthesis and expression of TGF-beta1, beta2, and beta3 in epithelium of HPV 16-positive cervical precancer: a study by microdissection, quantitative RT-PCR, and immunocytochemistry. J Pathol. 2000;192(4):494–501.
Torng PL, Chan WY, Lin CT, Huang SC. Decreased expression of human papillomavirus E2 protein and transforming growth factor-beta1 in human cervical neoplasia as an early marker in carcinogenesis. J Surg Oncol. 2003;84(1):17–23.
Chen Z, Ding J, Pang N, et al. The Th17/Treg balance and the expression of related cytokines in Uygur cervical cancer patients. Diagn Pathol. 2013;8:61.
Chen ZF, Xu Q, Ding JB, Zhang Y, Du R, Ding Y. CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ Treg and TGF-beta play important roles in pathogenesis of Uygur cervical carcinoma. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2012;33(5):502–7.
Ki KD, Tong SY, Huh CY, Lee JM, Lee SK, Chi SG. Expression and mutational analysis of TGF-beta/Smads signaling in human cervical cancers. J Gynecol Oncol. 2009;20(2):117–21.
Farley J, Gray K, Nycum L, Prentice M, Birrer MJ, Jakowlew SB. Endocervical cancer is associated with an increase in the ligands and receptors for transforming growth factor-beta and a contrasting decrease in p27(Kip1). Gynecol Oncol. 2000;78(2):113–22.
Santin AD, Hermonat PL, Hiserodt JC, et al. Differential transforming growth factor-beta secretion in adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Gynecol Oncol. 1997;64(3):477–80.
Hazelbag S, Kenter GG, Gorter A, Fleuren GJ. Prognostic relevance of TGF-beta1 and PAI-1 in cervical cancer. Int J Cancer. 2004;112(6):1020–8.
Dickson J, Davidson SE, Hunter RD, West CM. Pretreatment plasma TGF beta 1 levels are prognostic for survival but not morbidity following radiation therapy of carcinoma of the cervix. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000;48(4):991–5.
Ramos-Flores C, Romero-Gutierrez T, Delgado-Enciso I, et al. Polymorphisms in the genes related to angiogenesis are associated with uterine cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2013;23(7):1198–204.
Singh H, Jain M, Mittal B. Role of TGF-beta1 (-509C>T) promoter polymorphism in susceptibility to cervical cancer. Oncol Res. 2009;18(1):41–5.
Wang Q, Zhang C, Walayat S, Chen HW, Wang Y. Association between cytokine gene polymorphisms and cervical cancer in a Chinese population. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011;158(2):330–3.
Stanczuk GA, Tswana SA, Bergstrom S, Sibanda EN. Polymorphism in codons 10 and 25 of the transforming growth factor-beta 1 (TGF-beta1) gene in patients with invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Eur J Immunogenet. 2002;29(5):417–21.
Kim JW, Kim HS, Kim IK, et al. Transforming growth factor-beta 1 induces apoptosis through down-regulation of c-myc gene and overexpression of p27Kip1 protein in cervical carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 1998;69(3):230–6.
Donalisio M, Cornaglia M, Landolfo S, Lembo D. TGF-beta1 and IL-4 downregulate human papillomavirus-16 oncogene expression but have differential effects on the malignant phenotype of cervical carcinoma cells. Virus Res. 2008;132(1-2):253–6.
Choi HH, Jong HS, Hyun Song S, You Kim T, Kyeong Kim N, Bang YJ. p130 mediates TGF-beta-induced cell-cycle arrest in Rb mutant HT-3 cells. Gynecol Oncol. 2002;86(2):184–9.
Cassar L, Li H, Jiang FX, Liu JP. TGF-beta induces telomerase-dependent pancreatic tumor cell cycle arrest. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2010;320(1-2):97–105.
Hagemann T, Bozanovic T, Hooper S, et al. Molecular profiling of cervical cancer progression. Br J Cancer. 2007;96(2):321–8.
Hazelbag S, Gorter A, Kenter GG, van den Broek L, Fleuren G. Transforming growth factor-beta1 induces tumor stroma and reduces tumor infiltrate in cervical cancer. Hum Pathol. 2002;33(12):1193–9.
Nagura M, Matsumura N, Baba T, et al. Invasion of uterine cervical squamous cell carcinoma cells is facilitated by locoregional interaction with cancer-associated fibroblasts via activating transforming growth factor-beta. Gynecol Oncol. 2015;136:104–11.
Nuovo GJ. In situ detection of PCR-amplified metalloproteinase cDNAs, their inhibitors and human papillomavirus transcripts in cervical carcinoma cell lines. Int J Cancer. 1997;71(6):1056–60.
Yi JY, Hur KC, Lee E, Jin YJ, Arteaga CL, Son YS. TGFbeta1 -mediated epithelial to mesenchymal transition is accompanied by invasion in the SiHa cell line. Eur J Cell Biol. 2002;81(8):457–68.
Kim YM, Cho M. Activation of NADPH oxidase subunit NCF4 induces ROS-mediated EMT signaling in HeLa cells. Cell Signal. 2014;26(4):784–96.
Moon HS, Kim SC, Ahn JJ, Woo BH. Concentration of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and transforming growth factor-beta1 (TGF-beta1) in the serum of patients with cervical cancer: prediction of response. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2000;10(2):151–6.
Baritaki S, Sifakis S, Huerta-Yepez S, et al. Overexpression of VEGF and TGF-beta1 mRNA in Pap smears correlates with progression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia to cancer: implication of YY1 in cervical tumorigenesis and HPV infection. Int J Oncol. 2007;31(1):69–79.
Bequet-Romero M, Lopez-Ocejo O. Angiogenesis modulators expression in culture cell lines positives for HPV-16 oncoproteins. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2000;277(1):55–61.
Torres-Poveda K, Bahena-Roman M, Madrid-Gonzalez C, et al. Role of IL-10 and TGF-beta1 in local immunosuppression in HPV-associated cervical neoplasia. World J Clin Oncol. 2014;5(4):753–63.
Diaz-Benitez CE, Navarro-Fuentes KR, Flores-Sosa JA, et al. CD3zeta expression and T cell proliferation are inhibited by TGF-beta1 and IL-10 in cervical cancer patients. J Clin Immunol. 2009;29(4):532–44.
Lopez-Munoz H, Escobar-Sanchez ML, Lopez-Marure R, et al. Cervical cancer cells induce apoptosis in TCD4+ lymphocytes through the secretion of TGF-beta. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013;287(4):755–63.
Sheu BC, Chiou SH, Lin HH, et al. Up-regulation of inhibitory natural killer receptors CD94/NKG2A with suppressed intracellular perforin expression of tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T lymphocytes in human cervical carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2005;65(7):2921–9.
De Geest K, Bergman CA, Turyk ME, Frank BS, Wilbanks GD. Differential response of cervical intraepithelial and cervical carcinoma cell lines to transforming growth factor-beta 1. Gynecol Oncol. 1994;55(3 Pt 1):376–85.
Iancu IV, Botezatu A, Goia-Rusanu CD, et al. TGF-beta signalling pathway factors in HPV-induced cervical lesions. Roum Arch Microbiol Immunol. 2010;69(3):113–8.
Chen T, de Vries EG, Hollema H, et al. Structural alterations of transforming growth factor-beta receptor genes in human cervical carcinoma. Int J Cancer. 1999;82(1):43–51.
Kang SH, Won K, Chung HW, et al. Genetic integrity of transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta) receptors in cervical carcinoma cell lines: loss of growth sensitivity but conserved transcriptional response to TGF-beta. Int J Cancer. 1998;77(4):620–5.
Diaz-Chavez J, Hernandez-Pando R, Lambert PF, Gariglio P. Down-regulation of transforming growth factor-beta type II receptor (TGF-betaRII) protein and mRNA expression in cervical cancer. Mol Cancer. 2008;7:3.
Maliekal TT, Antony ML, Nair A, Paulmurugan R, Karunagaran D. Loss of expression, and mutations of Smad 2 and Smad 4 in human cervical cancer. Oncogene. 2003;22(31):4889–97.
Kloth JN, Kenter GG, Spijker HS, et al. Expression of Smad2 and Smad4 in cervical cancer: absent nuclear Smad4 expression correlates with poor survival. Mod Pathol. 2008;21(7):866–75.
Noordhuis MG, Fehrmann RS, Wisman GB, et al. Involvement of the TGF-beta and beta-catenin pathways in pelvic lymph node metastasis in early-stage cervical cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17(6):1317–30.
Lee S, Cho YS, Shim C, et al. Aberrant expression of Smad4 results in resistance against the growth-inhibitory effect of transforming growth factor-beta in the SiHa human cervical carcinoma cell line. Int J Cancer. 2001;94(4):500–7.
Baldus SE, Schwarz E, Lohrey C, et al. Smad4 deficiency in cervical carcinoma cells. Oncogene. 2005;24(5):810–9.
Klein-Scory S, Zapatka M, Eilert-Micus C, et al. High-level inducible Smad4-reexpression in the cervical cancer cell line C4-II is associated with a gene expression profile that predicts a preferential role of Smad4 in extracellular matrix composition. BMC Cancer. 2007;7:209.
Hariharan R, Babu JM, P R, Pillai MR. Mutational analysis of Smad7 in human cervical cancer. Oncol Rep. 2009;21(4):1001–4.
Peralta-Zaragoza O, Bermudez-Morales V, Gutierrez-Xicotencatl L, Alcocer-Gonzalez J, Recillas-Targa F, Madrid-Marina V. E6 and E7 oncoproteins from human papillomavirus type 16 induce activation of human transforming growth factor beta1 promoter throughout Sp1 recognition sequence. Viral Immunol. 2006;19(3):468–80.
Xu Q, Wang S, Xi L, et al. Effects of human papillomavirus type 16 E7 protein on the growth of cervical carcinoma cells and immuno-escape through the TGF-beta1 signaling pathway. Gynecol Oncol. 2006;101(1):132–9.
Gu W, Yeo E, McMillan N, Yu C. Silencing oncogene expression in cervical cancer stem-like cells inhibits their cell growth and self-renewal ability. Cancer Gene Ther. 2011;18(12):897–905.
Woodworth CD, Notario V, DiPaolo JA. Transforming growth factors beta 1 and 2 transcriptionally regulate human papillomavirus (HPV) type 16 early gene expression in HPV-immortalized human genital epithelial cells. J Virol. 1990;64(10):4767–75.
Baldwin A, Pirisi L, Creek KE. NFI-Ski interactions mediate transforming growth factor beta modulation of human papillomavirus type 16 early gene expression. J Virol. 2004;78(8):3953–64.
Shier MK, Neely EB, Ward MG, Meyers C, Howett MK. Transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGF beta 1) down-regulates expression and function of proliferation-inducing molecules in HPV-transformed cells. Anticancer Res. 1999;19(6b):4977–82.
Shier MK, Neely EB, Ward MG, et al. Correlation of TGF beta 1 overexpression with down-regulation of proliferation-inducing molecules in HPV-11 transformed human tissue xenografts. Anticancer Res. 1999;19(6b):4969–76.
Rorke EA, Zhang D, Choo CK, Eckert RL, Jacobberger JW. TGF-beta-mediated cell cycle arrest of HPV16-immortalized human ectocervical cells correlates with decreased E6/E7 mRNA and increased p53 and p21(WAF-1) expression. Exp Cell Res. 2000;259(1):149–57.
Deng W, Tsao SW, Kwok YK, et al. Transforming growth factor beta1 promotes chromosomal instability in human papillomavirus 16 E6E7-infected cervical epithelial cells. Cancer Res. 2008;68(17):7200–9.
Hypes MK, Pirisi L, Creek KE. Mechanisms of decreased expression of transforming growth factor-beta receptor type I at late stages of HPV16-mediated transformation. Cancer Lett. 2009;282(2):177–86.
Lee DK, Kim BC, Kim IY, Cho EA, Satterwhite DJ, Kim SJ. The human papilloma virus E7 oncoprotein inhibits transforming growth factor-beta signaling by blocking binding of the Smad complex to its target sequence. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(41):38557–64.
Paulikova S, Petera J, Sirak I, et al. ATM and TGFB1 genes polymorphisms in prediction of late complications of chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. Neoplasma. 2014;61(1):70–6.
Yang YC, Wang KL, Su TH, et al. Concurrent cisplatin-based chemoradiation for cervical carcinoma: tumor response, toxicity, and serum cytokine profiles. Cancer Invest. 2006;24(4):390–5.
De Ruyck K, Van Eijkeren M, Claes K, et al. TGFbeta1 polymorphisms and late clinical radiosensitivity in patients treated for gynecologic tumors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;65(4):1240–8.
Fan DM, Wang XJ, He T, et al. High expression of TGF-beta1 in the vaginal incisional margin predicts poor prognosis in patients with stage Ib-IIa cervical squamous cell carcinoma. Mol Biol Rep. 2012;39(4):3925–31.
Acknowledgments
This work was sponsored by Zhejiang Provincial Program for the Cultivation of High-level Innovative Health talents and Grant of Medical and Technology Project of Zhejiang Province (No. 2016KYA141).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
None
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhu, H., Luo, H., Shen, Z. et al. Transforming growth factor-β1 in carcinogenesis, progression, and therapy in cervical cancer. Tumor Biol. 37, 7075–7083 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-016-5028-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-016-5028-8