Abstract
Animal diseases are among the most debilitating issues in the animal farming industry, resulting in decreased productivity and product quality worldwide. An emerging alternative to conventional injectable vaccines is edible vaccines, which promise increased delivery efficiency while maintaining vaccine effectiveness. One of the most promising platforms for edible vaccines is duckweeds, due to their high growth rate, ease of transformation, and excellent nutritional content. This review explores the potential, feasibility, and advantages of using duckweeds as platforms for edible vaccines. Duckweeds have proven to be superb feed sources, as evidenced by numerous improvements in both quantity (e.g., weight gain) and quality (e.g., yolk pigmentation). In terms of heterologous protein production, duckweeds, being plants, are capable of expressing proteins with complex structures and post-translational modifications. Research efforts have focused on the development of duckweed-based edible vaccines, including those against avian influenza, tuberculosis, Newcastle disease, and mastitis, among others. As with any emerging technology, the development of duckweeds as a platform for edible vaccines is still in its early stages compared to well-established injectable vaccines. It is evident that more proof-of-concept studies are required to bring edible vaccines closer to the current standards of conventional vaccines. Specifically, the duckweed expression system needs further development in areas such as yield and growth rate, especially when compared to bacterial and mammalian expression systems. Continued efforts in this field could lead to breakthroughs that significantly improve the resilience of the animal farming industry against disease threats.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The animal farming industry plays a pivotal role in food production, particularly in meeting global protein demands. Beyond its primary focus on raising chickens, cattle, sheep, goats, birds, and swine (Parisi et al. 2020), the industry also encompasses aquaculture, including fish, shrimp, and shellfish farming (Valenti et al. 2021). While meat and eggs are the predominant products (Henchion et al. 2021), the industry also yields other vital commodities such as milk and leather. Forecasts by Henchion et al. (2021) suggest a continued surge in demand for meat, eggs, and milk until 2050, emphasizing the critical need for sustainable practices within animal farming. This escalating demand for animal protein is driven by the necessity for essential amino acids crucial for human health. Research by Attia et al. (2020) underscores the significance of these amino acids, highlighting their role in supporting various bodily functions. As populations increase and dietary preferences shift, the demand for sustainable animal protein production becomes more pressing (Miassi and Dossa 2023). Consequently, the animal farming industry faces the challenge of meeting increasing demands while minimizing its environmental footprint and ensuring animal welfare. Addressing these complex issues requires interdisciplinary efforts and innovative approaches to ensure the long-term viability of animal farming systems and their contribution to global food security.
Although animal husbandry has evolved over time, it continues to confront significant challenges. Among these challenges, two major issues stand out prominently: feed management and animal health (Buller et al. 2020). These two factors are crucially important, as they directly impact both the productivity and the welfare of animals within the industry. (Buller et al. 2020). Maintaining animal health is crucial, as farm animals are susceptible to various diseases without proper husbandry practices. Common livestock diseases, as outlined in Table 1, pose substantial threats to animal well-being and productivity. The repercussions of these diseases can manifest through a diverse array of symptoms, which can vary widely in severity from mild to severe. These symptoms may include ruffled feathers, which can indicate discomfort or distress, as well as a noticeable loss of appetite that can lead to further complications. Other potential signs include diarrhoea, weight loss, coughing, paralysis, and depression, reflecting a general decline in well-being, all contribute to the complex and challenging nature of managing these diseases effectively (Serbessa et al. 2023). Traditionally, diseases are often addressed through the administration of drugs and antibiotics, primarily as curative measures rather than preventive ones (Palma et al. 2020). However, preventive measures, such as vaccination, are increasingly recognized as more effective and sustainable approaches to disease management. Preventing diseases through vaccination serves multiple critical purposes. It not only reduces the reliance on antibiotics, which can help decrease the potential for developing antibiotic-resistant strains of bacteria, but also significantly lowers the risk of such resistance becoming a widespread problem (Kumar et al. 2020). Therefore, prioritizing vaccination as a preventive measure aligns with the goals of promoting animal welfare, enhancing productivity, and safeguarding public health within the animal farming industry.
Vaccines serve as invaluable tools in enhancing and strengthening immune responses within organisms. They work by stimulating the immune system to produce a targeted response, specifically through the generation of antibodies that provide immunity against particular pathogens (Tammas et al. 2024). By introducing a harmless component or a weakened form of the pathogen, vaccines effectively train the immune system to recognize and combat the actual disease-causing agents should they encounter them in the future (Tammas et al. 2024). These biological products can take various forms, including live-attenuated vaccines containing weakened pathogens, subunit vaccines comprising antigenic components of pathogens, or innovative approaches like mRNA vaccines and DNA vaccines, which encode specific antigens (Ghattas et al. 2021; Cid and Bolívar 2021). The administration of vaccines to animals aims to fortify their resilience and resistance against targeted diseases, ultimately reducing mortality rates and enhancing overall productivity within the animal farming industry (Hu et al. 2020). Despite the significant benefits of vaccination, conventional methods, such as administering individual injections, present a range of challenges. These traditional approaches are often labor-intensive and time-consuming, requiring considerable effort and resources to deliver each vaccine dose to individual animals or individuals (Ghattas et al. 2021). The process involves precise execution, and a substantial amount of time dedicated to ensuring that each recipient receives the correct dosage. This can be particularly demanding in large-scale settings or for populations with a high vaccination coverage requirement. Additionally, the need for trained personnel and the logistical complexities associated with maintaining proper vaccine storage and handling further contribute to the overall burden of these conventional vaccination methods (Ghattas et al. 2021). As a result, there is an ongoing need for more efficient and scalable vaccination strategies to streamline the process and improve overall effectiveness in disease prevention. Among these alternatives, edible vaccines emerge as a promising solution. By incorporating vaccine components into edible materials, such as feed, the process becomes more streamlined and accessible (Tammas et al. 2024). Edible vaccines offer the potential to revolutionize mass vaccination efforts in animal farming, offering a practical and efficient means of disease prevention while minimizing logistical hurdles (Mičúchová et al. 2022). As research in this area advances, the integration of edible vaccines into animal husbandry practices holds promise for enhancing disease management strategies and promoting sustainable agricultural practices.
Edible vaccines
Edible vaccines represent a promising innovation in the farming industry, offering significant advantages in efficiency and convenience. By integrating vaccination and feeding processes, farmers can save considerable time and effort. Many edible vaccines currently under development utilize transgenic plants that have been genetically engineered to express specific antigenic components of pathogens. These specially modified plants are designed to produce proteins or other molecules that mimic the structures of disease-causing agents. When consumed, these plants can stimulate the immune system to recognize and respond to these antigens, thereby inducing the production of antibodies (Sahoo et al. 2020). In addition to the ease of administration, plant-based edible vaccines offer several notable advantages over conventional vaccines. One significant benefit is their improved long-term storage capabilities (Burnett and Burnett 2020). Unlike traditional vaccines that often require stringent refrigeration and handling to maintain their efficacy, plant-based vaccines can be stored at ambient temperatures, which reduces the risk of spoilage and contamination (Burnett and Burnett 2020). This attribute not only enhances the stability of the vaccines but also simplifies the logistics and distribution, particularly in resource-limited settings. Plants have natural mechanisms for preserving their proteins and other compounds. Horn et al. (2004) showed that transformed plants producing heterologous proteins could still accumulate the protein even after the plant biomass had dried. By expressing antigens in plants, these proteins can be stored within the plant tissues, which can help maintain their stability and activity over time. Plants can also be processed into dried forms, which further extends the shelf life. Moreover, the plants offer excellent scalability because they can be cultivated practically anywhere (Obembe et al. 2011). The production costs for plant-based vaccines are generally lower compared to those for conventional vaccines (Rosales-Mendoza et al. 2020). This cost advantage can make vaccines more accessible and affordable, especially in underserved regions. Additionally, plant-based systems have the potential for more complex protein expressions (Burnett and Burnett 2020). Plants can be engineered to produce a variety of proteins with intricate structures that may be difficult to achieve using other production methods. Plant cells have been shown to express fully functional antibodies, including the necessary post-translational modifications (PTMs) (Diamos et al. 2020; Nessa et al. 2020). Diamos et al. (2020) reported that the efficiency of antibody production was 1.5 g/kg of leaf tissue. Although PTMs are currently given low priority in conventional vaccine manufacturing, they are believed to enhance a vaccine’s potential and immunogenicity, making it more effective and efficient (Ojha and Prajapati 2021). This capability allows for the development of vaccines with enhanced immunogenic properties, potentially leading to more effective and diverse vaccine formulations.
Along with their ability to produce more complex and larger proteins, plants can also be utilized in vaccine development and manufacturing due to their capacity for PTMs. This is advantageous in vaccine development because certain moieties integrated by pathogenic organisms are part of their pathogenic mechanisms and contribute to immunogenicity (Watanabe et al. 2019). For example, O-glycosylated proteins play a significant role in antigen display in antigen-presenting cells and the general major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-based immune response (Ojha and Prajapati 2021). Previous discussions have shown that a glycosylated protein produced in a higher-level expression system can induce greater immunogenicity compared to a non-glycosylated protein produced in a bacterial expression system (Feng et al. 2022; Nascimento and Leite 2012; Ojha and Prajapati 2021). Due to the high complexity and diversity of PTMs (Friso and van Wijk 2015), genetically engineered plants, including duckweeds, are capable of producing proteins that mimic the PTMs found in pathogens, potentially leading to more effective vaccines. Additionally, plant-based glycans, such as those resulting from N-glycosylation, may generally enhance vaccine development due to their increased immunogenicity. Specifically, plant-based glycans could improve the detectability of pathogenic antigens, particularly through lectins or mannose/fucose receptors on the surface of dendritic cells (Franconi et al. 2010). This capability allows for the development of vaccines with enhanced immunogenic properties, potentially leading to more effective and diverse vaccine formulations. Overall, these benefits contribute to making plant-based edible vaccines a promising and innovative approach in the field of immunization.
Notably, edible vaccines primarily activate the mucosal immune system of vaccinated animals, which encompasses both innate and adaptive immunity mechanisms (Debnath et al. 2022). Within the gastrointestinal tract, antigenic proteins delivered by edible vaccines are primarily captured by microfold (M) cells, specialized epithelial cells found in the follicle-associated epithelium of Peyer’s patches (Kurup and Thomas 2020). M cells possess the unique ability to transport macromolecules from the intestinal lumen to antigen-presenting cells within Peyer’s patches, facilitating the initiation of immune responses (Clark et al. 2001). This targeted delivery mechanism enhances the efficacy of edible vaccines, contributing to their potential as a practical and effective tool for disease prevention in animal farming. Tobacco has emerged as a prominent candidate for edible vaccine platforms, with transgenic tobacco varieties being developed to express vaccines against various diseases (Kurup and Thomas 2020). Notably, Dow AgroScience LLC has produced transgenic tobacco expressing a vaccine against Newcastle disease, which has received approval from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) (Takeyama et al. 2015). Similarly, Planet Biotechnology Inc. has developed transgenic tobacco expressing a secretory antibody vaccine targeting tooth decay, approved by the European Union (EU) (Kim and Yang 2010). However, despite its utility in vaccine production, tobacco is not suitable for animal feed, prompting the exploration of alternative platforms. Duckweeds, members of the Lemnoideae family, have garnered attention as promising alternatives. These small monocots, typically floating on water surfaces, offer unique advantages. With frond sizes ranging from 0.5 to 4 mm, duckweeds are highly adaptable and possess rapid growth rates (Yang et al. 2021; Yoshida et al. 2021). The Lemnoideae family comprises five identified genera: Landoltia, Lemna, Spirodela, Wolffia, and Wolffiella (Sembada and Faizal 2019). This diversity underscores the potential of duckweeds as versatile platforms for both animal feed and the production of value-added bioproducts (Fig. 1). Exploring the dual-functionality of duckweeds could unlock novel opportunities for sustainable agriculture and biotechnology, offering solutions that integrate nutrition, disease prevention, and production efficiency in animal farming practices.
Duckweeds as nutritious feed sources
Duckweeds, characterized by their small size and aquatic habitat, offer a plethora of advantages that make them highly favorable for various applications, including animal feed production. With frond sizes ranging from 0.5 to 4 mm, depending on the genus, duckweeds exhibit remarkable growth rates, with Wolffia doubling its biomass every 3.28 days at a specific growth rate of 0.21/day (Faizal et al. 2021; Sembada and Faizal 2023). This rapid growth, coupled with their ability to accumulate proteins and starch in substantial amounts—up to 36.2% and 17.2% dry weight, respectively—renders duckweeds an excellent source of nutrition (Li et al. 2016). Moreover, research indicates that duckweeds offer additional health benefits for farm animals. For instance, studies have shown that incorporating duckweeds into the diets of laying hens results in eggs with higher Omega-3 levels, enhancing their nutritional value (Anderson et al. 2011). Similarly, feeding duckweeds to dairy cows has been demonstrated to improve the hematological and antioxidant profiles of their blood plasma, indicating potential health benefits (Tanuwiria and Mushawwir 2020). Notably, duckweeds boast an impressive nutritional profile, containing all essential amino acids at higher levels than several traditional feed sources such as chickpea, corn, lentil, rice, soybean, and wheat (Appenroth et al. 2018). Additionally, duckweeds are rich in sugars in the form of starch, comprising 18–53% of their dry weight, making them an essential component of animal feed formulations (Xu et al. 2023). Furthermore, duckweeds contain a variety of other compounds beneficial for animal health, including fatty acids, minerals, carotenoids, tocopherols, and sterols (Appenroth et al. 2018; Sembada and Faizal 2022). This comprehensive nutritional profile underscores the potential of duckweeds as a sustainable and versatile feed source for enhancing animal health and productivity in the agricultural sector.
Duckweeds boast a diverse array of fatty acids, with polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA), saturated fatty acids (SFA), and monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA) being the most prevalent (Appenroth et al. 2018). Within these groups, various individual fatty acids are found in duckweeds, ranging from capric acid (C10:0) to montanic acid (C28:0), with each contributing to the nutritional profile of these plants. In addition to fatty acids, duckweeds contain essential minerals such as calcium, potassium, magnesium, sodium, phosphorus, as well as microelements like iron, manganese, copper, zinc, and iodine. They also provide carotenoids such as (all-E)-β-carotene, (9Z)-β-carotene, and tocopherols like α-tocopherol, which contribute to their nutritional value. Furthermore, sterols found in duckweeds include phytol, campesterol, and stigmasterol, among others (Appenroth et al. 2018). These compounds, coupled with the ease of cultivation and low cost of production, make duckweeds an exceptional source of nutrition for animals. Several studies have demonstrated the added benefits of incorporating duckweeds into animal feed formulations, highlighting their potential to enhance animal health and productivity (see Table 2 for details). Overall, the comprehensive nutritional profile and versatility of duckweeds make them a promising and sustainable feed option for the agricultural industry.
Duckweeds as edible vaccine platforms
The expression of heterologous proteins via genetic engineering of plant genomes offers numerous advantages over other expression systems (Kulshreshtha et al. 2022). Notably, plant-based production boasts low production costs, scalability, the capacity to synthesize complex proteins, and a reduced risk of contamination by human or animal pathogens (Gerszberg and Hnatuszko-Konka 2022). As genetic engineering continues to advance, an increasing number of plant species are being utilized as platforms for heterologous protein production (Sembada et al. 2024). Among these platforms, duckweeds have emerged as a promising option. Duckweeds offer several characteristics that make them highly suitable for heterologous protein production. They can be easily transformed using Agrobacterium, and they can be induced into callus, which can then be regenerated back into fronds (Li et al. 2004; Yamamoto et al. 2001). This versatility facilitates efficient genetic modification and protein expression in duckweeds, as previously reported in several studies (Fig. 2). Indeed, transgenic duckweeds have demonstrated the ability to produce various valuable bioproducts, including hirudin (Kozlov et al. 2019), highlighting their potential as a platform for heterologous protein expression. As research in this field progresses, duckweeds are likely to become increasingly important for the production of heterologous proteins. Their ease of manipulation, rapid growth, and ability to accumulate high levels of proteins make them attractive candidates for industrial-scale protein production. By harnessing the capabilities of duckweeds, researchers can explore new avenues for the production of valuable bioproducts with diverse applications.
The genomes of duckweed species have been extensively investigated and sequenced (An et al. 2018), with the National Centre for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) hosting a growing database of duckweed sequences. This resource not only aids genetic engineering endeavors but also enhances evolutionary and phylogenetic analyses. Duckweeds’ versatility as heterologous protein production platforms underscore their potential in the animal farming industry, particularly in the production of edible vaccines. Recent studies have confirmed duckweeds’ ability to express antigenic proteins, eliciting immune responses in animals and conferring immunity against pathogens (Bertran et al. 2015). Notably, research has targeted several significant pathogens and diseases (Fig. 3), including avian influenza, tuberculosis, porcine epidemic diarrhea, mastitis, Newcastle disease, hemorrhagic disease, and vibriosis. These findings highlight the promising role of duckweeds in disease prevention within animal populations and underscore their potential as a sustainable solution for enhancing animal health and productivity in agricultural settings.
It is well established that duckweeds are among the fastest-growing plant species, capable of producing a higher yield per area compared to average crop plants. Depending on the species, duckweeds have been shown to achieve a doubling time of 1.34 to 4.54 days (μ = 0.153–0.519/day) (Faizal et al. 2021; Sembada et al. 2019). These doubling times are comparable to those of Human Embryonic Kidney (HEK) 293 cells (1.38 days) and Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cells (0.6–1 day) (Ritacco et al. 2018; Abaandou et al. 2021) and exceed those of important crop plants considered by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) and USDA (Ziegler et al. 2015). Consequently, duckweeds are also known for their higher protein yields per area. These higher protein yields have been observed in comparison to several other crops, including soybean, rice, and corn (Baek et al. 2021). Nevertheless, efforts are ongoing to further increase both biomass and protein yields, involving genetic engineering, environmental manipulations, and their combinations. Environmental manipulations aim to introduce stresses or, conversely, optimize growth conditions to induce specific metabolic processes. For example, growing duckweeds under different light intensity conditions has been shown to affect biomass yield (Femeena et al. 2023). Other environmental parameters include nutrient availability, temperature, air circulation, photoperiod, humidity, and heavy metal concentrations, among others (Coughlan et al. 2022; Femeena et al. 2023).
As discussed above, duckweeds offer exceptional ease of transformation, which benefits both heterologous protein production and other applications. Common genetic engineering approaches include enhancing transcription and translation and downregulating transcriptional and post-transcriptional silencing genes (Feng et al. 2022). For example, one method of regulating extraneous genes is the use of specific promoters. In duckweeds, as in other plant species, the 35S promoter derived from Cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) is one of the most commonly used promoters for constitutive expression of transgenes (Amack and Antunes 2020; Feng et al. 2022). However, recent advances in duckweed biotechnology have identified a constitutive endogenous promoter, LpSUT2, which maintains activity better than CaMV35S in the presence of antibiotics (Wei et al. 2024). In addition to constitutive traits, genetic engineering can introduce inducible traits through the use of inducible promoters, combining genetic engineering and environmental manipulation to elicit specific traits. An example involving duckweeds is the use of MmDGAT2, an estradiol-inducible promoter, for the production of triacylglycerol (Liang et al. 2023).
The introduction of a foreign protein may lead to changes in the balance of endogenous proteins, potentially reducing the concentration of some essential proteins while increasing the overall protein content due to the presence of the recombinant protein (Burnett and Burnett 2020). Recombinant protein expression could also alter the overall protein content of duckweeds. Tan et al. (2022) expressed interleukin-17B in L. minor. This protein reached a concentration of up to 1.89 μg/g, which corresponds to 0.036% of the total soluble protein. In another study, the heterologous expression level reached up to 0.24% of the total soluble protein (Sun et al. 2007). If recombinant proteins represent a small portion of the total soluble proteins, the overall balance of essential nutrients in duckweeds, such as amino acids, vitamins, and minerals, is likely preserved. This means that the nutritional quality of duckweeds as a feed source remains largely intact. Recombinant protein expression could also impact the levels of secondary metabolites in plants. Secondary metabolites, which include vitamins, flavonoids, and phenolics, might be reduced or altered due to the metabolic demands of recombinant protein production. Yao et al. (2022) reported the accumulation of saponins following the heterologous expression of the phenylalanine ammonia lyase gene. In another study, the expression of the transcription factor, LtP1L, in L. turionifera could alter the flavonoid content (Wang et al. 2024).
When comparing antigen production productivity across different platforms, duckweeds generally offer a lower antigen yield per production time compared to conventional systems. Duckweeds, due to their rapid growth and high biomass yield (Faizal et al. 2021), provide a cost-effective and scalable platform, but their overall antigen productivity might not match that of bacteria or mammalian cells. Firsov et al. (2015) reported that the expression of the avian influenza virus antigen in L. gibba yielded up to 40 μg/g of plant fresh weight. Bacteria, particularly E. coli, can produce recombinant proteins in large quantities relatively quickly, often achieving milligrams to grams per liter of culture within days (Aguilar-Yáñez et al. 2010), though they may struggle with complex proteins requiring PTMs. The expression of the avian influenza virus antigen in E. coli could achieve average overall yields of 0.5–1.0 g/L (Aguilar-Yáñez et al. 2010). In contrast, mammalian cell systems, such as CHO cells, can produce complex, properly folded proteins with PTMs at high yields, typically in the range of grams per liter of culture (Chen et al. 2019), but this process is more costly and time-consuming, often taking several weeks. Chen et al. (2019) reported that the expression of the avian influenza virus antigen in CHO cells yielded 18–20 mg/L. Therefore, duckweeds still have the potential to be developed as a platform for antigen expression and could serve as a promising dual-function platform for both feed and vaccine production as also presented in Table 3. Table 3 is a subset of Table 4 and shows the instances in which duckweeds have been used as hosts for the production of antigenic proteins. The studies clearly demonstrate the success of duckweed-based edible vaccines in eliciting proper immune responses in test subjects. They therefore serve as exemplars of duckweeds’ potential in the production of edible vaccines.
At the time of writing, only a few plant-produced vaccines have been approved. Notable examples include the vaccine against Newcastle disease, which was the first plant-made vaccine approved in 2006 (Takeyama et al. 2015), and more recently, the Covifenz vaccine against COVID-19 registered in Canada (Su et al. 2023). This limited number of approved plant-produced vaccines reflects the current state of the art in plant expression systems as platforms for heterologous protein expression on a commercial scale. In comparison to bacterial cells, plant cells generally have a longer doubling time, which leads to lower overall product yields. Historically, most therapeutic proteins were developed with the need for humanized PTMs in mind, making mammalian cells the logical choice for production. Consequently, this focus has driven extensive advancements in the utilization and engineering of bacterial and mammalian expression systems, particularly for the manufacturing of heterologous proteins. Supporting systems for these platforms have also advanced significantly in recent decades, resulting in increased robustness, cost-effectiveness, and compliance with regulatory standards (Schillberg et al. 2019).
Inevitably, the same level of effort has not been applied to the development of plant expression systems, resulting in their underdevelopment and limited utilization compared to conventional platforms. This underdevelopment is evident not only in the biotechnological aspects of protein manufacturing but also in engineering aspects such as downstream processing (Schillberg et al. 2019). This has, in turn, discouraged further development in this area, perpetuating a cycle of underdevelopment and stagnation. The currently established technologies in plant-based protein production still have significant drawbacks compared to more conventional platforms, such as lower yields and less humanized PTMs. However, the use of duckweeds as an expression platform could address the concern of low growth rates, as duckweeds are among the fastest-growing plants, even comparable to HEK293 cells. Additionally, while humanized PTMs are challenging to achieve, their necessity is less critical in vaccine manufacturing compared to the PTMs of pathogens, which are simpler and more feasible to produce. Despite these challenges, extensive research is ongoing in the production of therapeutic proteins for both human applications and other uses.
Duckweeds as edible vaccine platform for avian influenza
Avian influenza, commonly known as bird flu, is a contagious disease that primarily affects birds raised on farms, including chickens, turkeys, ducks, and geese (Palmore 2006). It is caused by viruses belonging to the Orthomyxoviridae family, classified into influenza A, B, and C viruses based on their hemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (NA) proteins (Nuwarda et al. 2021). While most avian influenza viruses do not infect humans, certain strains, such as H5N1, H7N7, and H9N2, have demonstrated zoonotic potential (Kessler et al. 2021). As such, avian influenza viruses pose a significant threat to both animal and human health, underscoring the urgent need for effective vaccines. Vaccination is crucial for mitigating the spread of the disease and preventing potential outbreaks in both poultry and humans. Developing effective avian influenza vaccines is essential for safeguarding public health and ensuring the sustainability of poultry farming practices.
In recent studies, researchers have explored the potential of duckweeds as a platform for expressing candidate proteins, with a particular focus on the hemagglutinin (HA) protein. Bertran et al. (2015) conducted experiments wherein they expressed the haemagglutinin H5 protein from clade 2.1.1 A/chicken/Indonesia/7/2003 (Indo/03) in L. minor, utilizing the Lemna Expression System (LEX System™, Biolex Therapeutics, Pittsboro, NC). Through Western blot analysis, they confirmed successful expression of the H5 protein, with a size of 77 kDa, and estimated its expression to reach 12% of the total dissolved protein, approximately 280 mg/kg of frozen biomass. To evaluate the efficacy of the edible vaccine produced, white leghorn chickens infected with three different types of viruses were tested: clade Indo/03 virus (the same seed virus with antigen originating from), clade 2.3.2.1 A/chicken/Vietnam/NCVD-421/2010 (VN/10) virus, and clade 2.1.3.2 A/chicken/West Java/PWT-WIJ/2006 (PWT/06) virus. Results indicated varying survival rates among the chickens following virus infections (Bertran et al. 2015). Chickens infected with Indo/03 showed full protection, primarily attributed to the virus used in the edible vaccine’s antigen source. These findings highlight the potential of duckweed-based edible vaccines in providing protection against avian influenza viruses and warrant further investigation into their effectiveness and applicability.
In a study by Nguyen et al. (2012), the expression of the avian influenza hemagglutinin (AIV HA) gene was successfully achieved in isoleucine-auxotrophic L. minor 8627. This isoleucine auxotrophy was induced through RNA interference (RNAi) targeting the threonine deaminase (TD) gene. Two vectors, AUXC01 and AUXC02, both containing L. minor TD cDNA (LmTD), were utilized to produce auxotrophic isoleucine plants. These vectors were driven by constitutive promoters, namely the Superpromoter and S. polyrhiza polyubiquitin (SpUBQ), respectively. The AIV HA gene sequence, sourced from the A/chicken/Indonesia/7/2003 H5N1 virus isolate, was inserted into three different vectors: MERB05, MERB06, and MERB07. The results demonstrated successful gene silencing of the TD gene and simultaneous expression of the AIV HA gene in L. minor. Moreover, there was a notable increase in AIV HA expression, robust auxotrophic phenotype, and the plants showed full recovery post-isoleucine supplementation. These findings underscore the feasibility of utilizing genetic engineering techniques to express foreign genes in duckweeds, paving the way for potential applications in vaccine production and biotechnology. Further research is warranted to explore the full potential of this approach in agricultural and medical contexts.
In another study by Thu et al. (2015), the expression of H5N1 HA1 protein was demonstrated in S. polyrhiza. The transformation process involved the use of A. tumefaciens AGL-1 carrying the p6D35S plasmid containing the HA1 gene. PCR analysis confirmed successful transgene insertion, with the expected band position observed at approximately 600 bp for the HA1 gene. Given the potential for antigenic shifts and drifts in influenza viruses, efforts have been made to develop a more universal avian influenza vaccine. One such candidate is the M2e (extracellular domain of the matrix protein 2) peptide-based vaccine, which exhibits greater conservation across avian influenza virus strains (Zhao et al. 2010). By targeting more conserved antigens, researchers aim to create vaccines capable of providing broader protection against diverse strains of avian influenza viruses, thus addressing challenges posed by viral evolution and variability.
In a study by Firsov et al. (2015), M2e protein expression was achieved in L. minor through Agrobacterium-mediated gene transfer. A transformation cassette containing the M130 gene sequence for M2e peptide expression was developed and introduced into L. minor callus via A. tumefaciens mediation, followed by regeneration into fronds. Various analyses, including GUS assays, PCR, Southern blot, Western blot, and ELISA, confirmed successful production of the M2e protein by transgenic L. minor, reaching a titre of 0.97 mg/g frozen weight. Despite successful protein expression, initial trials on mice failed as they did not consume the transgenic duckweed. Consequently, protein extracted from the biomass was administered to the mice, revealing a specific immune response against M2e elicited by the transformed duckweed protein. This suggests the potential of duckweeds as heterologous protein expression systems, particularly for avian influenza virus antigens. These findings underscore the promise of duckweeds in biotechnological applications, offering a sustainable and cost-effective approach to vaccine production and disease prevention in agricultural and medical fields.
Duckweeds as edible vaccine platform for tuberculosis
Tuberculosis (TB) is an infectious disease affecting both humans and animals, caused by bacteria of the genus Mycobacterium. Swine, rabbits, and cattle are particularly susceptible to TB infections among farm animals (Sevilla et al. 2020). Certain mycobacterial species, including Mycobacterium bovis, are zoonotic, posing a threat to both animal and human health. M. bovis primarily infects cattle and can induce TB-like symptoms in humans and other mammals (Damene et al. 2020). Due to its ability to cross species barriers, M. bovis infections in cattle can have significant implications for public health, particularly in regions where consumption of unpasteurized dairy products is common. Therefore, effective surveillance and control measures are essential to prevent the transmission of TB from animals to humans and to mitigate the spread of this infectious disease in both animal and human populations.
In the quest for effective vaccines against mycobacterial infections, numerous mycobacterial antigens have been investigated as potential candidates. Among these, the Early Secreted Antigenic Target 6 (ESAT6), encoded by the esxA gene, and Antigen 85B (Ag85B), encoded by the fpbBTMD gene, have garnered considerable attention. In a study by Peterson et al. (2015), L. minor was genetically modified to express a fusion protein ESAT6-Ag85B(ΔTMD)-6His. The genetic engineering process involved the use of A. rhizogenes, a commonly used Agrobacterium strain known for inducing hairy root cultures. The transformation cassette, constructed on the pCB064 vector, contained the 35S promoter and genes necessary for recombinant fusion protein production. The infection process between plant tissue and A. rhizogenes suspension lasted for 30 min. Confirmation of transgene integration through PCR analysis targeting rolB, nptII, and fbpBTMD genes indicated successful transformation (Matvieieva et al. 2011). These findings underscore the potential of duckweeds as versatile platforms for heterologous protein expression, paving the way for the development of novel vaccines against mycobacterial infections.
Duckweeds as edible vaccine platform for Newcastle disease
Newcastle disease (ND) is a highly contagious viral infection that primarily afflicts birds, particularly domestic poultry and wildfowl. The causative agent, the Newcastle disease virus (NDV), belongs to the Paramyxoviridae family (Rtishchev et al. 2023). ND poses a significant threat to global poultry populations, leading to substantial economic losses and concerns for food security. Transmission primarily occurs through direct contact with infected birds’ bodily fluids, including respiratory secretions, feces, and contaminated feed and water sources (Dzogbema et al. 2021). In poultry, NDV infection can result in severe inflammation, particularly with virulent strains such as genotype VII or "GM" strains (Gao et al. 2022). These strains elicit robust immune responses characterized by the production of proinflammatory cytokines, including interleukin-1β (IL-1β). IL-1β serves as a pivotal proinflammatory cytokine in the innate immune response against NDV (Cai et al. 2023). Immune cells detect the presence of the virus and release IL-1β, orchestrating the inflammatory cascade. This cytokine plays a crucial role in coordinating the immune response by recruiting and activating immune cells, notably macrophages and neutrophils, to the site of infection (Duque and Descoteaux 2014). Through its actions, IL-1β helps to contain viral spread and initiate the adaptive immune response, ultimately contributing to the resolution of NDV infection in affected birds. Understanding the mechanisms underlying the immune response to NDV is essential for developing effective control strategies and vaccines to combat this devastating poultry disease.
Tan et al. (2022) successfully expressed chicken interleukin-17B (chIL-17B) in L. minor. Initially, plant explants were induced to form callus using growth regulators on MS media. Subsequently, the calluses were incubated with A. tumefaciens strain GV3101 containing pCAMBIA2301(p2301). Transformants were selected based on GUS staining and PCR analysis using specific primers. Protein expression was assessed via Western blot analysis with anti-His-Tag monoclonal antibody, and the recombinant IL-17B was purified using Ni–NTA agarose (Tan et al. 2022). Furthermore, they demonstrated that duckweed-based chIL-17B, when used as an adjuvant, effectively enhanced systemic and mucosal immune responses, particularly elevating mucosal sIgA levels at effector sites, and reducing virus load (Tan et al. 2022). These findings underscore the potential of duckweed-based platforms for the production of immunomodulatory proteins and their application as adjuvants in vaccine development, highlighting the importance of such strategies in enhancing immune responses against infectious diseases.
Duckweeds as edible vaccine platform for mastitis
Mastitis, a prevalent and economically consequential ailment in dairy animals, predominantly afflicts cattle but can also impact goats and sheep. This inflammatory malady of the mammary gland is typified by infection and swelling, often induced by various microorganisms, primarily bacteria (Cobirka et al. 2020). The disease manifests in both clinical and subclinical forms, with bacteria such as Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus spp., and E. coli among the culprits (Ashraf and Imran 2020). Clinical mastitis presents observable indications like udder swelling, heat, redness, and tenderness, with milk from affected quarters exhibiting abnormalities such as clots, pus, or blood (Samad 2022). Conversely, subclinical mastitis may lack overt external signs but is discernible through elevated somatic cell counts in milk, indicating an ongoing infection. Effective management and timely intervention are crucial in curbing mastitis’s detrimental effects on animal health and productivity. Implementing rigorous hygiene protocols, employing mastitis control strategies, and promptly treating infections are essential steps in mitigating the impact of this pervasive disease on dairy operations.
Penaeidins 3a, vital antimicrobial peptides present in the hemolymph of shrimp and other crustaceans like penaeid shrimp, constitute an integral component of the shrimp’s innate immune system, serving as a defense mechanism against bacterial and fungal infections (Aweya et al. 2021). These peptides have garnered attention for their potent antibacterial activity against notorious pathogens such as S. aureus and E. coli (Xiao et al. 2021; Wu et al. 2019). In a recent study by Yang et al. (2023), Penaeidins 3a (Pen3a) expressed in L. turionifera 5511 exhibited notable antibacterial efficacies against both E. coli and S. aureus. The transformation process involved the introduction of the Pen3a expression vector pCAMBIA-1301-Pen3a into L. turionifera 5511 through Agrobacterium-mediated transfer. Transformants were successfully identified via GUS testing and PCR analysis. The antibacterial activity of Pen3a duckweed against E. coli was measured to be approximately 19.2 ± 0.6 mm, while it was around 15.5 ± 0.5 mm against S. aureus, as observed in inhibition zone assays (Yang et al. 2023). Furthermore, the expression of genes associated with sphingolipid metabolism and the phagocytosis process was found to be up-regulated in Pen3a-expressing duckweed (Yang et al. 2023). These findings underscore the potential of Penaeidins 3a as promising candidates for enhancing disease resistance in agricultural and aquacultural settings, highlighting the importance of further research in this field.
Duckweeds as edible vaccine platform for porcine epidemic diarrhoea
Porcine epidemic diarrhea (PED) stands as a prevalent affliction in swine, particularly lethal to newborn piglets, posing substantial challenges to swine farming productivity and sustainability (Yu et al. 2024). The causative agent, Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus (PEDV), is an RNA virus classified within the Alphacoronavirus genus of the Coronaviridae family (Turlewicz-Podbielska and Pomorska-Mól, 2021). Among its distinctive features, PEDV harbors a spike protein (PEDV-SpikeI) crucial for viral entry into host cells, thus representing an attractive target for vaccine development against PEDV (Li et al. 2020). Similar to other coronaviruses, PEDV-SpikeI facilitates interaction with host cell receptors, initiating infection processes. Consequently, targeting this protein in vaccine formulations holds promise for mitigating PEDV outbreaks and minimizing associated economic losses within the swine industry. Continuing research efforts aimed at elucidating PEDV pathogenesis and refining vaccine strategies are imperative for effective disease management and safeguarding swine health and welfare.
In a groundbreaking study by Ko et al. (2011), L. minor fronds underwent transformation using A. tumefaciens to incorporate a gene encoding PEDV-SpikeI fused with a c-myc tag, facilitating subsequent protein purification processes. Following transformation, the resultant fronds underwent rigorous antibiotic screening, with successful transformants subsequently subcultured to initiate vegetative growth. Comprehensive analyses utilizing PCR, RT-PCR, and Western blot techniques yielded confirmatory outcomes: PCR analysis revealed the presence of a distinct 330-bp band corresponding to the primer for the PEDV-SpikeI gene, while RT-PCR results validated successful transcription of the inserted gene within the fronds (Ko et al. 2011). Furthermore, Western blot analysis corroborated these findings by demonstrating the presence of a 28-kDa protein, consistent with the anticipated size of the PEDV-SpikeI-myc fusion protein (Ko et al. 2011). This pioneering research showcases the potential of duckweed as a versatile platform for heterologous protein expression, laying the groundwork for further advancements in vaccine development against PEDV and other viral pathogens.
Duckweeds as edible vaccine for haemorrhagic disease
Grass Carp Haemorrhagic Disease (GCHD) stands as a prevalent affliction in grass carp fish, with staggering losses in rearing estimated to reach up to 85% due to its impact (Liang et al. 2014). The causative agent, Grass Carp Reovirus (GCRV), a double-stranded RNA virus classified within the genus Aquareovirus of the Reoviridae family, serves as the primary culprit behind GCHD (He et al. 2017). Among the key antigen candidates investigated for GCRV, the VP35 protein, encoded by the S11 gene, has emerged as a focal point due to its pivotal role in GCRV pathogenesis (Mu et al. 2020; Zeng et al. 2021). Notably, the VP35 protein harbors a conserved putative zinc-binding motif CxxC-n16-HxC sequence, adding to its significance (Gao et al. 2018). In a significant breakthrough, Zhu et al. (2022) succeeded in transforming A. tumefaciens to carry the S11 gene utilizing the pCAMBIA1303 plasmid. This transformed Agrobacterium strain was then introduced to the callus of L. aequinoctialis, induced through the application of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) and thidiazuron (TDZ), serving as a pivotal step in the development of a potential vaccine against GCHD (Zhu et al. 2022). Such advancements underscore the promise of duckweed as a versatile platform for heterologous protein expression, opening new avenues for combating devastating diseases in aquatic ecosystems.
After the successful introduction of the S11 gene into the callus of L. aequinoctialis, select transformants underwent further cultivation to regenerate into fronds (Zhu et al. 2022). The confirmation of transformation efficacy was conducted through a series of assays. GUS assays revealed distinct blue coloration in both roots and leaves of the transformed fronds, contrasting with the absence of color change in non-transformed fronds. PCR analysis provided conclusive evidence of S11 gene integration into the genomic DNA of L. aequinoctialis. Western blot analysis corroborated these findings by detecting a prominent 50 kDa immunoreactive band, indicative of the presence of the VP35 protein (Zhu et al. 2022). Additionally, fluorescence observations unveiled a conspicuous green fluorescent signal in the transformant fronds, further validating the successful expression of the introduced gene (Zhu et al. 2022). This comprehensive validation underscores the robustness of the transformation process and the potential of the engineered duckweed as a promising platform for future research in disease management.
Duckweeds as edible vaccine for vibriosis
Vibriosis poses a significant threat to aquatic animal farming, affecting a wide range of species such as fish, shrimp, prawn, clam, and crab (Arunkumar et al. 2020). Among the various types of aquatic animals susceptible to vibriosis are Barramundi Perch (Lates calcarifer), Summer Flounder (Paralichthys dentatus), Malabar Grouper (Epinephelus malabaricus), Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei), red prawn (Solenocera sub-uda), Indian prawn (Fenneropenaeus indicus), carpet clam (Paphia textile), and mud crab (Scylla serrata) (Ina-Salwany et al. 2019). Vibriosis is primarily caused by gram-negative bacteria belonging to the Vibrio genus, including V. harveyi, V. anguillarum, V. alginolyticus, and V. parahaemolyticus (Zhang et al. 2022). These bacteria commonly infect various internal organs such as the gills, skin, intestinal tract, kidney, and liver of the host organisms (Chin et al. 2020). Traditional methods for preventing vibriosis often involve incorporating prebiotics into the feed. These prebiotic mixtures typically comprise yeast, microalgae, gram-positive bacteria, and gram-negative bacteria (Elias et al. 2023). Incorporating prebiotics into feed has been demonstrated to stimulate the production of antagonistic compounds and organic acids, regulate immune responses, and enhance feed conversion efficiency (Krysiak et al. 2021). Such interventions aim to bolster the overall health and resilience of aquatic animals, reducing the incidence and severity of vibriosis outbreaks in aquaculture settings.
Vaccination offers a promising strategy for more targeted and effective prevention against vibriosis compared to traditional methods like prebiotic supplementation. Vaccines can stimulate the development of specific immune responses tailored to combat Vibrio spp. infections (Kulkarni et al. 2021). One avenue of vaccine development targets Vibrio outer membrane proteins (OMPs), which exhibit high conservation across the Vibrio genus (Goh et al. 2022). Among these OMPs, the LamB protein has garnered attention as a potential vaccine antigen (Lun et al. 2014). To develop an edible vaccine based on LamB, the LamB gene was incorporated into the pMYC plasmid and introduced into disarmed A. tumefaciens EHA105 using a heat shock method (Heenatigala et al. 2020). The transformed agrobacteria were then mixed with W. arrhiza biomass, and transformants were selected using hygromycin. This process allows for the expression of LamB within the duckweed biomass, offering a convenient and potentially cost-effective means of administering vaccines to aquatic organisms susceptible to vibriosis (Heenatigala et al. 2020). Such vaccines hold promise for enhancing the immune defenses of aquatic animals and reducing the incidence and severity of vibriosis outbreaks in aquaculture settings.
The success of the transformation process was confirmed through multiple analyses, including PCR, RT-PCR, and immunoblotting (Heenatigala et al. 2020). PCR and RT-PCR results provided evidence of the integration and heterologous expression of the LamB gene within the plant genome. Immunoblotting further corroborated these findings by detecting a distinct band corresponding to the recombinant LamB protein, measuring approximately 52 kDa. Subsequent clinical trials involved feeding zebrafish (Danio rerio AB strain) challenged with V. alginolyticus, a bacterium responsible for vibriosis (Heenatigala et al. 2020). Remarkably, fish fed a diet comprising half normal feed and half transgenic W. arrhiza exhibited a mortality rate of only 36.7% when infected with vibriosis. In stark contrast, the mortality rate was 100% among fish fed only a normal diet, with all individuals succumbing to the infection after exposure to V. alginolyticus (Heenatigala et al. 2020). These findings underscore the efficacy of edible vaccines in enhancing the survival of fish afflicted with vibriosis, offering a promising avenue for disease management in aquatic ecosystems.
Future directions for the development of edible vaccines from duckweeds
In the animal farming industry, edible vaccines represent a paradigm shift in disease prevention strategies, offering a unique combination of immunization and nutrition in a single delivery system. The development of edible vaccines is highly incentivized, as they could streamline the vaccination process by delivering vaccines while simultaneously providing nutrients (Du et al. 2022). This dual functionality not only simplifies vaccination protocols but also addresses nutritional needs, promoting overall health and well-being in livestock populations. However, edible vaccines are still a nascent concept compared to well-established injectable vaccines. It is evident that more proof-of-concept studies are required to bring edible vaccines closer to the current standards of conventional vaccines. Additionally, as discussed above, duckweeds, and plant expression systems in general, still have several drawbacks that might impede the development of plant-based edible vaccines. The most prevalent of these are limited growth rates and yield. Most of these impediments stem from the underdevelopment of the plant expression system, which is exacerbated by the preference for bacterial and mammalian expression systems. This preference has led to greater research efforts focused on their development, creating a cycle that has overshadowed the plant expression system despite its many advantages and potential.
There are two major areas for future development concerning the use of duckweeds as an edible vaccine platform: the development of edible vaccines using duckweeds and the improvement of duckweeds as a platform for heterologous protein expression. In the first area, a key focus is the stability and storage of duckweed-based edible vaccines. This involves investigating the shelf life of the vaccines and developing methods to enhance their stability during storage and handling (Kumar et al. 2022). Effective post-harvest techniques will be necessary to maintain vaccine efficacy and facilitate ease of use and distribution. Another focus is the economic viability of duckweed-based edible vaccines, especially in comparison to conventional ones. This includes assessing the costs associated with cultivation, harvesting, and processing. Developing strategies for scaling up production will be essential to meet potential commercial demands and ensure the practicality of using duckweeds as a vaccine platform. Establishing clear regulatory pathways for plant-based edible vaccines will also be crucial for their approval and widespread use (Parvathy 2020). Research should focus on developing guidelines that ensure compliance with safety standards and efficacy requirements. Additionally, comprehensive safety assessments are necessary to evaluate any potential toxicity or allergenicity of the vaccine products (EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO) et al. 2022).
In the second area, a critical aspect for future development is optimizing the duckweed expression system to maximize yield, functionality, effectiveness, and safety (Trombetta et al. 2022). Harnessing the potential of duckweed-based edible vaccines will require enhancing genetic engineering techniques to optimize the production of vaccine antigens in duckweeds. This includes refining gene constructs to improve antigen expression, selecting suitable promoters, and utilizing advanced transformation methods for efficient integration of vaccine genes into duckweed genomes (Lee et al. 2023). Exploring innovative genetic modifications could further enhance the effectiveness of the vaccine production process. Additionally, studying how duckweeds manage PTMs will be crucial for ensuring that vaccine proteins are properly folded and functional (Lee et al. 2023). To validate the potential of duckweed-based vaccines, extensive preclinical studies using animal models are essential. These studies should assess the immunogenicity, efficacy, and safety of the vaccines, including determining the optimal dosage and delivery methods (Naasani 2022). Ensuring that the vaccines elicit strong and long-lasting immune responses will be key to their success.
Conclusions
The development of duckweeds as edible vaccines represents a strategic approach to harnessing the full potential of these aquatic plants. Renowned for their versatility, duckweeds have long served as valuable sources of nutrition for various animal species. Their widespread adoption as animal feed stems from their rapid growth rates, ease of cultivation, and nutritional richness. By incorporating duckweeds into animal diets, farmers can not only ensure adequate nutrition for their livestock but also mitigate feed procurement costs. The concept of edible vaccines involves engineering duckweeds to express antigens or immunogenic proteins that, when consumed by animals, stimulate an immune response, thereby providing protection against specific diseases. This approach offers several advantages, including ease of administration, reduced stress on animals, and potentially enhanced vaccine efficacy through mucosal immune stimulation. As research progresses, duckweeds are being genetically engineered to express a diverse array of vaccine antigens targeting various infectious diseases prevalent in livestock and aquaculture. By leveraging the remarkable attributes of duckweeds, scientists aim to revolutionize the field of veterinary medicine by providing a cost-effective, sustainable, and efficient means of disease prevention in animal populations. Through continued innovation and refinement, duckweed-based edible vaccines hold immense promise for safeguarding animal health and welfare in agricultural and aquaculture settings.
Moreover, duckweeds possess inherent capabilities for producing heterologous proteins, making them attractive candidates for vaccine development. Studies have demonstrated that duckweeds can generate heterologous proteins with titers comparable to those achieved in more established plant models. By leveraging these natural protein production capabilities, researchers have embarked on extensive efforts to utilize duckweeds as a versatile platform for edible vaccine production. However, challenges regarding the development of duckweed-based edible vaccines persist. These include the novelty of edible vaccines, which still presents significant gaps between edible and injectable vaccines. Inherent limitations of the plant expression system are also significant obstacles, stemming from the underdevelopment of the platform compared to more conventional systems. Nevertheless, research is ongoing to improve these conditions and maximize the potential of duckweeds as an edible vaccine platform.
References
Abaandou L, Quan D, Shiloach J (2021) Affecting HEK293 cell growth and production performance by modifying the expression of specific genes. Cells 10:1667. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10071667
Abdel-Latif HM, Yilmaz E, Dawood MA, Ringø E, Ahmadifar E, Yilmaz S (2022) Shrimp vibriosis and possible control measures using probiotics, postbiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics: a review. Aquaculture 551:737951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2022.737951
Aguilar-Yáñez JM, Portillo-Lara R, Mendoza-Ochoa GI, García-Echauri SA, López-Pacheco F, Bulnes-Abundis D, Salgado-Gallegos J, Lara-Mayorga IM, Webb-Vargas Y, León-Angel FO, Rivero-Aranda RE, Oropeza-Almazán Y, Ruiz-Palacios GM, Zertuche-Guerra MI, DuBois RM, White SW, Schultz-Cherry S, Russell CJ, Alvarez MM (2010) An influenza A/H1N1/2009 hemagglutinin vaccine produced in Escherichia coli. PLoS One 5:e11694. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0011694
Ahammad MU, Swapon MSR, Yeasmin T, Rahman MS, Ali MS (2003) Replacement of sesame oil cake by duckweed (Lemna minor) in broiler diet. Pak J Biol Sci 6:1450–1453. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2003.1450.1453
Akter M, Chowdhury SD, Akter Y, Khatun MA (2011) Effect of duckweed (Lemna minor) meal in the diet of laying hen and their performance. Bangladesh Res Publ J 5:252–261
Amack SC, Antunes MS (2020) CaMV35S promoter–A plant biology and biotechnology workhorse in the era of synthetic biology. Curr Plant Biol 24:100179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpb.2020.100179
An D, Li C, Zhou Y, Wu Y, Wang W (2018) Genomes and transcriptomes of duckweeds. Front Chem 6:230. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2018.00230
Anderson KE, Lowman Z, Stomp AM, Chang J (2011) Duckweed as a feed ingredient in laying hen diets and its effect on egg production and composition. Int J Poult Sci 10:4–7. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2011.4.7
Apostolakos I, Laconi A, Mughini-Gras L, Yapicier ÖŞ, Piccirillo A (2021) Occurrence of colibacillosis in broilers and its relationship with avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC) population structure and molecular characteristics. Front Vet Sci 8:737720. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.737720
Appenroth KJ, Sree KS, Bog M, Ecker J, Seeliger C, Böhm V, Lorkowski S, Sommer K, Vetter W, Tolzin-Banasch K, Kirmse R, Leiterer M, Dawczynski C, Liebisch G, Jahreis G (2018) Nutritional value of the duckweed species of the genus Wolffia (Lemnaceae) as human food. Front Chem 6:483. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2018.00483
Arunkumar M, LewisOscar F, Thajuddin N, Pugazhendhi A, Nithya C (2020) In vitro and in vivo biofilm forming Vibrio spp: a significant threat in aquaculture. Process Biochem 94:213–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2020.04.029
Ashraf A, Imran M (2020) Causes, types, etiological agents, prevalence, diagnosis, treatment, prevention, effects on human health and future aspects of bovine mastitis. Anim Health Res Rev 21:36–49. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1466252319000094
Aslam S, Zuberi A, Nazir A (2017) Effect of duckweed by replacing soybean in fish feed on growth performance of Grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella) and Silver carp (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix). Int J Fish Aquat Stud 5:278–282
Attia YA, Al-Harthi MA, Korish MA, Shiboob MH (2020) Protein and amino acid content in four brands of commercial table eggs in retail markets in relation to human requirements. Animals 10:406. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10030406
Aweya JJ, Zheng Z, Zheng X, Yao D, Zhang Y (2021) The expanding repertoire of immune-related molecules with antimicrobial activity in penaeid shrimps: a review. Rev Aquac 13:1907–1937. https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12551
Babayemi OJ, Bamikole MA, Omojola AB (2006) Evaluation of the nutritive value and free choice intake of two aquatic weeds (Nephrolepis biserrata and Spirodela polyrhiza) by West African dwarf goats. Trop Subtrop Agroecosyst 6:15–22
Baek G, Saeed M, Choi HK (2021) Duckweeds: their utilization, metabolites and cultivation. Appl Biol Chem 64:73. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13765-021-00644-z
Balaji P, Satheeshkumar PK, Venkataraman K, Vijayalakshmi MA (2016) Expression of anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) single-chain variable fragment (scFv) in Spirodela punctata plants transformed with Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Biotechnol Appl Biochem 63:354–361. https://doi.org/10.1002/bab.1373
Bao W, Tang KF, Alcivar-Warren A (2020) The complete genome of an endogenous nimavirus (Nimav-1_LVa) from the Pacific whiteleg shrimp Penaeus (Litopenaeus) vannamei. Genes 11:94. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11010094
Bertran K, Thomas C, Guo X, Bublot M, Pritchard N, Regan JT, Cox KM, Gasdaska JR, Dickey LF, Kapczynski DR, Swayne DE (2015) Expression of H5 hemagglutinin vaccine antigen in common duckweed (Lemna minor) protects against H5N1 high pathogenicity avian influenza virus challenge in immunized chickens. Vaccine 33:3456–3462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.05.076
Blasco JM, Moreno E, Muñoz PM, Conde-Álvarez R, Moriyon I (2023) A review of three decades of use of the cattle brucellosis rough vaccine Brucella abortus RB51: myths and facts. BMC Vet Res 19:211. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-023-03773-3
Bouchard SS, Murphy AK, Berry JA (2010) Non-additive dietary effects in juvenile slider turtles, Trachemys scripta. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol 155:264–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2009.11.013
Brown WY, Choct M, Pluske JR (2013) Duckweed (Landoltia punctata) in dog diets decreases digestibility but improves stool consistency. Anim Prod Sci 53:1188–1194. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN13198
Bukar AM, Jesse FFA, Abdullah CAC, Noordin MM, Lawan Z, Mangga HK, Azmi MLM (2021) Immunomodulatory strategies for parapoxvirus: current status and future approaches for the development of vaccines against Orf virus infection. Vaccines 9(11):1341
Buller H, Blokhuis H, Lokhorst K, Silberberg M, Veissier I (2020) Animal welfare management in a digital world. Animals 10:1779. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10101779
Burnett MJ, Burnett AC (2020) Therapeutic recombinant protein production in plants: challenges and opportunities. Plants People Planet 2(2):121–132. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp3.10073
Cai J, Wang S, Du H, Fan L, Yuan W, Xu Q, Ren J, Lin Q, Xiang B, Ding C, Ren T, Chen L (2023) NDV-induced autophagy enhances inflammation through NLRP3/Caspase-1 inflammasomes and the p38/MAPK pathway. Vet Res 54:43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13567-023-01174-w
Casaux ML, Neto WS, Schild CO, Costa RA, Macías-Rioseco M, Caffarena RD, Silveira CS, Aráoz V, Díaz DB, Giannitti F, Fraga M (2023) Epidemiological and clinicopathological findings in 15 fatal outbreaks of salmonellosis in dairy calves and virulence genes in the causative Salmonella enterica Typhimurium and Dublin strains. Braz J Microbiol 54:475–490. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42770-022-00898-9
Chanroj S, Jaiprasert A, Issaro N (2021) A novel technique for recombinant protein expression in duckweed (Spirodela polyrhiza) turions. J Plant Biotechnol 48:156–164. https://doi.org/10.5010/JPB.2021.48.3.156
Chantiratikul A, Chantiratikul P, Sangdee A, Maneechote U, Bunchasak C, Chinrasri O (2010) Performance and carcass characteristics of Japanese quails fed diets containing Wolffia Meal [Wolffia globosa (L). Wimm.] as a protein replacement for soybean meal. Int J Poult Sci 9:562–566. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2010.562.566
Chen TH, Liu WC, Lin CY, Liu CC, Jan JT, Spearman M, Butler M, Wu SC (2019) Glycan-masking hemagglutinin antigens from stable CHO cell clones for H5N1 avian influenza vaccine development. Biotechnol Bioeng 116:598–609. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.26810
Chin YK, Ina-Salwany MY, Zamri-Saad M, Amal MNA, Mohamad A, Lee JY, Annas S, Al-saari N (2020) Effects of skin abrasion in immersion challenge with Vibrio harveyi in Asian seabass Lates calcarifer fingerlings. Dis Aquat Organ 137:167–173. https://doi.org/10.3354/dao03435
Cid R, Bolívar J (2021) Platforms for production of protein-based vaccines: from classical to next-generation strategies. Biomolecules 11:1072. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11081072
Clark MA, Jepson MA, Hirst BH (2001) Exploiting M cells for drug and vaccine delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 50:81–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-409X(01)00149-1
Cobirka M, Tancin V, Slama P (2020) Epidemiology and classification of mastitis. Animals 10:2212. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10122212
Coughlan NE, Walsh É, Bolger P, Burnell G, O’Leary N, O’Mahoney M, Paolacci S, Wall D, Jansen MAK (2022) Duckweed bioreactors: Challenges and opportunities for large-scale indoor cultivation of Lemnaceae. J Clean Prod 336:130285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130285
Crilly JP, Evans M, Tähepõld K, Sargison N (2020) Haemonchosis: dealing with the increasing threat of the barber’s pole worm. Livestock 25:237–246. https://doi.org/10.12968/live.2020.25.5.237
Damene H, Tahir D, Diels M, Berber A, Sahraoui N, Rigouts L (2020) Broad diversity of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex strains isolated from humans and cattle in Northern Algeria suggests a zoonotic transmission cycle. Plos Negl Trop Dis 14:e0008894. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008894
Debnath N, Thakur M, Khushboo NNP, Gautam V, Kumar Yadav A, Kumar D (2022) Insight of oral vaccines as an alternative approach to health and disease management: An innovative intuition and challenges. Biotechnol Bioeng 119:327–346. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.27987
Diamos AG, Hunter JG, Pardhe MD, Rosenthal SH, Sun H, Foster BC, DiPalma MP, Chen Q, Mason HS (2020) High level production of monoclonal antibodies using an optimized plant expression system. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 7:472. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2019.00472
Du Y, Hu X, Miao L, Chen J (2022) Current status and development prospects of aquatic vaccines. Front Immunol 13:1040336. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.1040336
Duque GA, Descoteaux A (2014) Macrophage cytokines: involvement in immunity and infectious diseases. Front Immunol 5:117833. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2014.00491
Dzogbema KFX, Talaki E, Batawui KB, Dao BB (2021) Review on Newcastle disease in poultry. Int J Chem Biol Sci 15:773–789. https://doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v15i2.29
EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO), Mullins E, Bresson JL, Dalmay T, Dewhurst IC, Epstein MM, Firbank LG, Guerche P, Hejatko J, Naegeli H, Nogué F, Rostoks N, Serrano JJS, Savoini G, Veromann E, Veronesi F, Dumont AF, Moreno FJ (2022) Scientific Opinion on development needs for the allergenicity and protein safety assessment of food and feed products derived from biotechnology. EFSA J 20:e07044. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7044
Elias NA, Abu Hassan MS, Yusoff NAH, Tosin OV, Harun NA, Rahmah S, Hassan M (2023) Potential and limitation of biocontrol methods against vibriosis: a review. Aquac Int 31:2355–2398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-023-01091-x
Fagbohun OA (2022) Molecular detection and characterization of fowl pox virus in cutaneous pox in Turkeys. Afr J Biomed Res 25:373–378. https://doi.org/10.4314/ajbr.v25i3.13
Faizal A, Sembada AA, Priharto N (2021) Production of bioethanol from four species of duckweeds (Landoltia punctata, Lemna aequinoctialis, Spirodela polyrrhiza, and Wolffia arrhiza) through optimization of saccharification process and fermentation with Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Saudi J Biol Sci 28:294–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.10.002
Femeena PV, Roman B, Brennan RA (2023) Maximizing duckweed biomass production for food security at low light intensities: Experimental results and an enhanced predictive model. Environ Chall 11:100709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2023.100709
Feng Z, Li X, Fan B, Zhu C, Chen Z (2022) Maximizing the production of recombinant proteins in plants: from transcription to protein stability. Int J Mol Sci 23:13516. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232113516
Firsov A, Tarasenko I, Mitiouchkina T, Ismailova N, Shaloiko L, Vainstein A, Dolgov S (2015) High-yield expression of M2e peptide of avian influenza virus H5N1 in transgenic duckweed plants. Mol Biotechnol 57:653–661. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12033-015-9855-4
Firsov A, Tarasenko I, Mitiouchkina T, Shaloiko L, Kozlov O, Vinokurov L, Rasskazova E, Murashev A, Vainstein A, Dolgov S (2018) Expression and immunogenicity of M2e peptide of avian influenza virus H5N1 fused to ricin toxin B chain produced in duckweed plants. Front Chem 6:22. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2018.00022
Flores-Miranda MDC, Luna-González A, Cortés-Espinosa DV, Álvarez-Ruiz P, Cortés-Jacinto E, Valdez-González FJ, Escamilla-Montes R, González-Ocampo HA (2015) Effects of diets with fermented duckweed (Lemna sp.) on growth performance and gene expression in the Pacific white shrimp. Litopenaeus Vannamei Aquac Int 23:547–561. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-014-9835-x
Franconi R, Demurtas OC, Massa S (2010) Plant-derived vaccines and other therapeutics produced in contained systems. Expert Rev Vaccines 9:877–892. https://doi.org/10.1586/erv.10.91
Friso G, van Wijk KJ (2015) Posttranslational protein modifications in plant metabolism. Plant Physiol 169:1469–1487. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.15.01378
Gao Y, Pei C, Sun X, Zhang C, Li L, Kong X (2018) Plasmid pcDNA3. 1–s11 constructed based on the S11 segment of grass carp reovirus as DNA vaccine provides immune protection. Vaccine 36:3613–3621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.05.043
Gao P, Zhang S, Zhang X, Xu C, Chen L, Fan L, Ren J, Lin Q, Xiang B, Ren T (2022) S1PR1 regulates NDV-induced IL-1β expression via NLRP3/caspase-1 inflammasome. Vet Res 53:58. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13567-022-01078-1
Geraci-Yee S, Brianik CJ, Rubin E, Collier JL, Allam B (2021) Erection of a new genus and species for the pathogen of hard clams ‘Quahog Parasite Unknown’(QPX): Mucochytrium quahogii gen. nov., sp. nov. Protist 172:125793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protis.2021.125793
Gerszberg A, Hnatuszko-Konka K (2022) Compendium on food crop plants as a platform for pharmaceutical protein production. Int J Mol Sci 23:3236. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23063236
Ghattas M, Dwivedi G, Lavertu M, Alameh MG (2021) Vaccine technologies and platforms for infectious diseases: Current progress, challenges, and opportunities. Vaccines 9:1490. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9121490
Goh JXH, Tan LTH, Law JWF, Khaw KY, Ab Mutalib NS, He YW, Goh BH, Chan KG, Lee LH, Letchumanan V (2022) Insights into carbapenem resistance in Vibrio species: current status and future perspectives. Int J Mol Sci 23:12486. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232012486
Hang DT (1998) Ensiled cassava leaves and duckweed as protein sources for fattening pigs on farms in Central Vietnam. Livest Res Rural Dev 10:25
He L, Zhang A, Pei Y, Chu P, Li Y, Huang R, Liao L, Zhu Z, Wang Y (2017) Differences in responses of grass carp to different types of grass carp reovirus (GCRV) and the mechanism of hemorrhage revealed by transcriptome sequencing. BMC Genom 18:452. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-017-3824-1
Heenatigala PPM, Sun Z, Yang J, Zhao X, Hou H (2020) Expression of LamB vaccine antigen in Wolffia globosa (duck weed) against fish vibriosis. Front Immunol 11:1857. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.01857
Henchion M, Moloney AP, Hyland J, Zimmermann J, McCarthy S (2021) Trends for meat, milk and egg consumption for the next decades and the role played by livestock systems in the global production of proteins. Animal 15:100287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2021.100287
Horn ME, Woodard SL, Howard JA (2004) Plant molecular farming: systems and products. Plant Cell Rep 22:711–720. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-004-0767-1
Hu G, Do DN, Gray J, Miar Y (2020) Selection for favorable health traits: a potential approach to cope with diseases in farm animals. Animals 10:1717. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10091717
Ina-Salwany MY, Al-saari N, Mohamad A, Mursidi FA, Mohd-Aris A, Amal MNA, Kasai H, Mino S, Sawabe T, Zamri-Saad M (2019) Vibriosis in fish: a review on disease development and prevention. J Aquat Anim Health 31:3–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/aah.10045
Indarsih B, Tamsil MH (2012) Feeding diets containing different forms of duckweed on productive performance and egg quality of ducks. Trop Anim Sci J 35:128–132. https://doi.org/10.5398/medpet.2012.35.2.128
Kaur VI, Ansal MD, Dhawan A (2012) Effect of feeding duckweed (Lemna minor) based diets on the growth performance of rohu, Labeo rohita (Ham.). Indian J Anim Nutr 29:406–409
Kessler S, Harder TC, Schwemmle M, Ciminski K (2021) Influenza A viruses and zoonotic events—are we creating our own reservoirs? Viruses 13:2250. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13112250
Kgotlele T, Modise B, Nyange JF, Thanda C, Cattoli G, Dundon WG (2020) First molecular characterization of avian paramyxovirus-1 (Newcastle disease virus) in Botswana. Virus Genes 56:646–650. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11262-020-01770-4
Khandaker T, Khan MJ, Shahjalal M, Rahman MM (2007) Use of duckweed (Lemna perpusilla) as a protein source feed item in the diet of semi-scavenging Jinding layer ducks. J Poult Sci 44:314–321. https://doi.org/10.2141/jpsa.44.314
Khvatkov P, Firsov A, Shvedova A, Kozlov O, Chernobrovkina M, Pushin A, Shaloiko L, Dolgov S (2021) Wolffia arrhiza as a promising producer of recombinant hirudin. 3 Biotech 11:209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-021-02762-3
Kim TG, Yang MS (2010) Current trends in edible vaccine development using transgenic plants. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng 15:61–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12257-009-3084-2
Ko SM, Sun HJ, Oh MJ, Song IJ, Kim MJ, Sin HS, Goh CH, Kim YW, Lim PO, Lee HY, Kim SW (2011) Expression of the protective antigen for PEDV in transgenic duckweed, Lemna minor. Hortic Environ Biotechnol 52:511–515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13580-011-0007-x
Koga H, Munechika Y, Matsumoto H, Nanjoh Y, Harada K, Makimura K, Tsuboi R (2020) Guinea pig seborrheic dermatitis model of Malassezia restricta and the utility of luliconazole. Med Mycol 58:820–826. https://doi.org/10.1093/mmy/myz128
Kozlov ON, Mitiouchkina TY, Tarasenko IV, Shaloiko LA, Firsov AP, Dolgov SV (2019) Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Lemna minor L. with Hirudin and β-glucuronidase genes. Appl Biochem Microbiol 55:805–815. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0003683819080076
Krysiak K, Konkol D, Korczyński M (2021) Overview of the use of probiotics in poultry production. Animals 11:1620. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11061620
Kulkarni A, Krishnan S, Anand D, Kokkattunivarthil Uthaman S, Otta SK, Karunasagar I, Kooloth Valappil R (2021) Immune responses and immunoprotection in crustaceans with special reference to shrimp. Rev Aquac 13:431–459. https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12482
Kulshreshtha A, Sharma S, Padilla CS, Mandadi KK (2022) Plant-based expression platforms to produce high-value metabolites and proteins. Front Plant Sci 13:1043478. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1043478
Kumar SB, Arnipalli SR, Ziouzenkova O (2020) Antibiotics in food chain: The consequences for antibiotic resistance. Antibiotics 9:688. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9100688
Kumar R, Srivastava V, Baindara P, Ahmad A (2022) Thermostable vaccines: an innovative concept in vaccine development. Expert Rev Vaccines 21:811–824. https://doi.org/10.1080/14760584.2022.2053678
Kurup VM, Thomas J (2020) Edible vaccines: Promises and challenges. Mol Biotechnol 62:79–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12033-019-00222-1
LaFrentz BR, Králová S, Burbick CR, Alexander TL, Phillips CW, Griffin MJ, Waldbieser GC, García GC, Sebastião FDA, Soto E, Loch TP, Liles MR, Snekvik KR (2022) The fish pathogen Flavobacterium columnare represents four distinct species: Flavobacterium columnare, Flavobacterium covae sp. nov., Flavobacterium davisii sp. nov., and Flavobacterium oreochromis sp. nov., and emended description of Flavobacterium columnare. Syst Appl Microbiol 45:126293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.syapm.2021.126293
Lee J, Lee SK, Park JS, Lee KR (2023) Plant-made pharmaceuticals: exploring studies for the production of recombinant protein in plants and assessing challenges ahead. Plant Biotechnol Rep 17:53–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11816-023-00821-0
Li J, Jain M, Vunsh R, Vishnevetsky J, Hanania U, Flaishman M, Perl A, Edelman M (2004) Callus induction and regeneration in Spirodela and Lemna. Plant Cell Rep 22:457–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-003-0724-4
Li Y, Zhang F, Daroch M, Tang J (2016) Positive effects of duckweed polycultures on starch and protein accumulation. Biosci Rep 36:e00380. https://doi.org/10.1042/BSR20160158
Li Z, Ma Z, Li Y, Gao S, Xiao S (2020) Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus: Molecular mechanisms of attenuation and vaccines. Microb Pathog 149:104553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2020.104553
Liang HR, Li YG, Zeng WW, Wang YY, Wang Q, Wu SQ (2014) Pathogenicity and tissue distribution of grass carp reovirus after intraperitoneal administration. Virol J 11:178. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-422X-11-178
Liang Y, Yu XH, Anaokar S, Shi H, Dahl WB, Cai Y, Mollá-Morales A, Altpeter F, Ernst E, Schwender J, Martienssen RA, Shanklin J (2023) Engineering triacylglycerol accumulation in duckweed (Lemna japonica). Plant Biotechnol J 21:317–330. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.13943
Lieke T, Meinelt T, Hoseinifar SH, Pan B, Straus DL, Steinberg CE (2020) Sustainable aquaculture requires environmental-friendly treatment strategies for fish diseases. Rev Aquac 12:943–965. https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12365
Links IJ, Denholm LJ, Evers M, Kingham LJ, Greenstein RJ (2021) Is vaccination a viable method to control Johne’s disease caused by Mycobacterium avium subsp paratuberculosis? Data from 12 million ovine vaccinations and 7.6 million carcass examinations in New South Wales, Australia from 1999–2009. Plos One 16:e0246411. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246411
Lun J, Xia C, Yuan C, Zhang Y, Zhong M, Huang T, Hu Z (2014) The outer membrane protein, LamB (maltoporin), is a versatile vaccine candidate among the Vibrio species. Vaccine 32:809–815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.12.035
Marcer F, Tosi F, Franzo G, Vetri A, Ravagnan S, Santoro M, Marchiori E (2020) Updates on ecology and life cycle of Sulcascaris sulcata (Nematoda: Anisakidae) in Mediterranean grounds: molecular identification of larvae infecting edible scallops. Front Vet Sci 7:64. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00064
Matvieieva NA, Kishchenko OM, Shakhovsky AM, Kuchuk MV (2011) Agrobacterium rhizogenes-mediated transfer of tuberculosis antigens ESAT6 and Ag85B genes Lemna minor L. Biotechnol Acta 4:46–53
Miassi YE, Dossa KF (2023) Forecasting animal protein supply in Asia and Europe in light of climate change, population growth and land pressure. Trop Plants 2:22. https://doi.org/10.48130/TP-2023-0022
Mičúchová A, Piačková V, Frébort I, Korytář T (2022) Molecular farming: Expanding the field of edible vaccines for sustainable fish aquaculture. Rev Aquac 14:1978–2001. https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12683
Mu C, Vakharia VN, Zhou Y, Jiang N, Liu W, Meng Y, Li Y, Xue M, Zhang J, Zeng L, Zhong Q, Fan Y (2020) A novel subunit vaccine based on outer capsid proteins of Grass Carp Reovirus (GCRV) provides protective immunity against GCRV Infection in rare minnow (Gobiocypris rarus). Pathogens 9:945. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9110945
Naasani I (2022) Establishing the pharmacokinetics of genetic vaccines is essential for maximising their safety and efficacy. Clin Pharmacokinet 61:921–927. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40262-022-01149-8
Nascimento IP, Leite L (2012) Recombinant vaccines and the development of new vaccine strategies. Braz J Med Biol Res 45:1102–1111. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-879X2012007500142
Nelsen A, Lin CM, Hause BM (2021) Porcine parvovirus 2 is predominantly associated with macrophages in porcine respiratory disease complex. Front Vet Sci 8:726884. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.726884
Nessa MU, Rahman MA, Kabir Y (2020) Plant-produced monoclonal antibody as immunotherapy for cancer. Biomed Res Int 2020:3038564. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/3038564
Nguyen LV, Cox KM, Ke JS, Peele CG, Dickey LF (2012) Genetic engineering of a Lemna isoleucine auxotroph. Transgenic Res 21:1071–1083. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-012-9594-2
Nguyen VV, Dong HT, Senapin S, Kayansamruaj P, Pirarat N, Rung-Ruangkijkrai T, Tiawsirisup S, Rodkhum C (2020) Synergistic infection of Ichthyophthirius multifiliis and Francisella noatunensis subsp. orientalis in hybrid red tilapia (Oreochromis sp.). Microb. Pathog. 147:104369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2020.104369
Nolan JV, Bell RE, Thomson ES (2001) Duckweed as a protein source for fine-wool Merino sheep: its edibility and effects on wool yield and characteristics. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 14:507–514. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2001.507
Nunes T, Skampardonis V, Costa F, Da Conceição MA, Sperling D (2023) Cystoisospora suis in Portugal: an observational study of prevalence, management, and risk factors. Porcine Health Manag 9:34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40813-023-00328-8
Nuwarda RF, Alharbi AA, Kayser V (2021) An overview of influenza viruses and vaccines. Vaccines 9:1032. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9091032
Obembe OO, Popoola JO, Leelavathi S, Reddy SV (2011) Advances in plant molecular farming. Biotechnol Adv 29:210–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2010.11.004
Ojha R, Prajapati VK (2021) Cognizance of posttranslational modifications in vaccines: a way to enhanced immunogenicity. J Cell Physiol 236:8020–8034. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.30483
Paguia HM, Paguia RQ, Pinsel JRA, Zaballa S, Abuan AG, Corpuz MNC (2022) Effect of adding different levels of Duckweed (Lemna minor Linn.) in the diet on live body weight, Hematological traits and production cost of free-range chickens, Gallus domesticus Linn. (Black Austrolorp x Barred Playmouth Rock). Agric Sci 4:16–23. https://doi.org/10.30560/as.v4n2p16
Palma E, Tilocca B, Roncada P (2020) Antimicrobial resistance in veterinary medicine: an overview. Int J Mol Sci 21:1914. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21061914
Palmore J (2006) A clear and present danger to international security: highly pathogenic avian influenza. Def Secur Anal 22:111–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/14751790600763989
Paramasivam R, Gopal DR, Dhandapani R, Subbarayalu R, Elangovan MP, Prabhu B, Veerappan V, Nandheeswaran A, Paramasivam S, Muthupandian S (2023) Is AMR in dairy products a threat to human health? An updated review on the origin, prevention, treatment, and economic impacts of subclinical mastitis. Infect Drug Resist 16:155–178. https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S384776
Parisi G, Tulli F, Fortina R, Marino R, Bani P, Zotte AD, Angelis AD, Piccolo G, Pinotti L, Schiavone A, Terova G, Prandini A, Gasco L, Roncarati A, Danieli PP (2020) Protein hunger of the feed sector: the alternatives offered by the plant world. Ital J Anim Sci 19:1204–1225. https://doi.org/10.1080/1828051X.2020.1827993
Parvathy ST (2020) Engineering plants as platforms for production of vaccines. Am J Plant Sci 11:707–735. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2020.115052
Peterson AA, Vasylenko MY, Matvieieva NA, Kuchuk MV (2015) Accumulation of recombinant fusion protein-secretory analog of Ag85B and ESAT6 Mycobacterium tuberculosis proteins-in transgenic Lemna minor L. plants. Biotechnol Acta 8:39–47. https://doi.org/10.15407/biotech8.05.039
Ravindhiran R, Sivarajan K, Sekar JN, Murugesan R, Dhandapani K (2023) Listeria monocytogenes an emerging pathogen: a comprehensive overview on listeriosis, virulence determinants, detection, and anti-listerial interventions. Microb Ecol 86:2231–2251. https://doi.org/10.1111/cmi.13186
Rawson AM, Dempster AW, Humphreys CM, Minton NP (2023) Pathogenicity and virulence of Clostridium botulinum. Virulence 14:2205251. https://doi.org/10.1080/21505594.2023.2205251
Ritacco FV, Wu Y, Khetan A (2018) Cell culture media for recombinant protein expression in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells: History, key components, and optimization strategies. Biotechnol Prog 34:1407–1426. https://doi.org/10.1002/btpr.2706
Rival S, Wisniewski JP, Langlais A, Kaplan H, Freyssinet G, Vancanneyt G, Vunsh R, Perl A, Edelman M (2008) Spirodela (duckweed) as an alternative production system for pharmaceuticals: a case study, aprotinin. Transgenic Res 17:503–513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-007-9123-x
Rojas OJ, Liu Y, Stein HH (2014) Concentration of metabolizable energy and digestibility of energy, phosphorus, and amino acids in lemna protein concentrate fed to growing pigs. J Anim Sci 92:5222–5229. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2014-8146
Rosales-Mendoza S, Márquez-Escobar VA, González-Ortega O, Nieto-Gómez R, Arévalo-Villalobos JI (2020) What does plant-based vaccine technology offer to the fight against COVID-19? Vaccines 8:183. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines8020183
Roy P (2020) Highly efficient vaccines for Bluetongue virus and a related Orbivirus based on reverse genetics. Curr Opin Virol 44:35–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coviro.2020.05.003
Rtishchev A, Treshchalina A, Shustova E, Boravleva E, Gambaryan A (2023) An outbreak of Newcastle disease virus in the moscow region in the summer of 2022. Vet Sci 10:404. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci10060404
Sahoo A, Mandal AK, Dwivedi K, Kumar V (2020) A cross talk between the immunization and edible vaccine: current challenges and future prospects. Life Sci 261:118343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2020.118343
Salguero FJ (2020) Comparative pathology and pathogenesis of African swine fever infection in swine. Front Vet Sci 7:282. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00282
Samad M (2022) Review on mastitis in dairy lactating animals and their public health importance: the 56 years Bangladesh perspective. J Vet Med One Health Res 4:33–114. https://doi.org/10.36111//jvmohr.2022.4(2).0033
Samrot AV, Sean TC, Bhavya KS, Sahithya CS, Chan-Drasekaran S, Palanisamy R, Robinson ER, Subbiah SK, Mok PL (2021) Leptospiral infection, pathogenesis and its diagnosis—a review. Pathogens 10:145. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10020145
Schillberg S, Raven N, Spiegel H, Rasche S, Buntru M (2019) Critical analysis of the commercial potential of plants for the production of recombinant proteins. Front Plant Sci 10:720. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00720
Sembada AA, Faizal A (2019) Effect of polyculture cultivation system and addition of abscisic acid (ABA) on enhancement of starch and protein content from duckweeds. AIP Conf Proc 2120:030026. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5115630
Sembada AA, Faizal A (2022) Protein and lipid composition of duckweeds (Landoltia punctata and Wolffia arrhiza) grown in a controlled cultivation system. Asian J Plant Sci 21:637–642. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajps.2022.637.642
Sembada AA, Faizal A (2023) Characterization of starch from duckweeds and its conversion into reducing sugars via enzymatic saccharification. Asian J Plant Sci 22:130–137. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajps.2023.130.137
Sembada AA, Fukuhara T, Suzuki T, Lenggoro IW (2024) Stem cutting: a novel introduction site for transporting water-insoluble particles into tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) seedlings. Plant Physiol Biochem 206:108297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2023.108297
Serbessa TA, Geleta YG, Terfa IO (2023) Review on diseases and health management of poultry and swine. Int J Avian Wildl Biol 7:27–38. https://doi.org/10.15406/ijawb.2023.07.00187
Sevilla IA, Arnal MC, Fuertes M, Martín E, Comenge J, Elguezabal N, de Luco DF, Garrido JM (2020) Tuberculosis outbreak caused by Mycobacterium caprae in a rabbit farm in Spain. Transbound Emerg Dis 67:431–441. https://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.13366
Shi J, Zeng X, Cui P, Yan C, Chen H (2023) Alarming situation of emerging H5 and H7 avian influenza and effective control strategies. Emerg Microbes Infect 12(1):2155072. https://doi.org/10.1080/22221751.2022.2155072
Sogbesan OA, Onoja CF, Adedeji HA, Idowu TA (2015) Utilization of treated duckweed meal (Lemna pausicostata) as plant protein supplement in African mud catfish (Clarias gariepinus) juvenile diets. Fish Aquac J 6:1000141. https://doi.org/10.4172/2150-3508.1000141
Storms J, Wirth A, Vasiliadis D, Brodard I, Hamann-Thölken A, Ambros C, Moog U, Jores J, Kuhnert P, Distl O (2021) Prevalence of Dichelobacter nodosus and ovine footrot in German sheep flocks. Animals 11:1102. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11041102
Struthers JD, Lim A, Ferguson S, Lee JK, Chako C, Okwumabua O, Cuneo M, Valle AMD, Brower A (2021) Meningoencephalitis, vasculitis, and abortions caused by Chlamydia pecorum in a herd of cattle. Vet Pathol 58:549–557. https://doi.org/10.1177/0300985820985288
Su H, Van Eerde A, Rimstad E, Bock R, Branza-Nichita N, Yakovlev IA, Clarke JL (2023) Plant-made vaccines against viral diseases in humans and farm animals. Front Plant Sci 14:1170815. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1170815
Sun Y, Cheng JJ, Himmel ME, Skory CD, Adney WS, Thomas SR, Tisserat B, Nishimura Y, Yamamoto YT (2007) Expression and characterization of Acidothermus cellulolyticus E1 endoglucanase in transgenic duckweed Lemna minor 8627. Bioresour Technol 98:2866–2872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2006.09.055
Sun C, Liu M, Chang J, Yang D, Zhao B, Wang H, Zhou G, Weng C, Yu L (2020) Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein L negatively regulates foot-and-mouth disease virus replication through inhibition of viral RNA synthesis by interacting with the internal ribosome entry site in the 5′ untranslated region. J Virol 94:e00282-e320. https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.00282-20
Suppadit T, Jaturasitha S, Sunthorn N, Poungsuk P (2012) Dietary Wolffia arrhiza meal as a substitute for soybean meal: its effects on the productive performance and egg quality of laying Japanese quails. Trop Anim Health Prod 44:1479–1486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-012-0091-7
Takeyama N, Kiyono H, Yuki Y (2015) Plant-based vaccines for animals and humans: recent advances in technology and clinical trials. Ther Adv Vaccines 3:139–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/2051013615613272
Takyi E, Stevick RJ, Witkop EM, Gregg L, Chesler-Poole A, Small JM, White MM, Hudson R, Giray C, Rowley DC, Nelson DR, Gomez-Chiarri M (2024) Probiotic treatment modulates the bacterial microbiome of larval eastern oysters, Crassostrea virginica, in hatcheries. Aquaculture 583:740624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2024.740624
Tammas I, Bitchava K, Gelasakis AI (2024) Transforming aquaculture through vaccination: A review on recent developments and milestones. Vaccines 12:732. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines12070732
Tan X, Chen S, Fang Y, Liu P, Hu Z, Jin Y, Yi Z, He K, Li X, Zhao L, Wang H, Zhao H (2022) Rapid and highly efficient genetic transformation and application of interleukin-17B expressed in Duckweed as mucosal vaccine adjuvant. Biomolecules 12:1881. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom12121881
Tanuwiria UH, Mushawwir A (2020) Hematological and antioxidants responses of dairy cow fed with a combination of feed and duckweed (Lemna minor) as a mixture for improving milk biosynthesis. Biodiversitas 21:4741–4746. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d211038
Thu PTL, Huong PT, Tien VV, Ham L, Khanh T (2015) Regeneration and transformation of gene encoding the hemagglutinin antigen of the H5N1 virus in frond of duckweed (Spirodela polyrhiza L). J Agric Stud 3:48. https://doi.org/10.5296/jas.v3i1.6867
Trombetta CM, Marchi S, Montomoli E (2022) The baculovirus expression vector system: a modern technology for the future of influenza vaccine manufacturing. Expert Rev Vaccines 21:1233–1242. https://doi.org/10.1080/14760584.2022.2085565
Turlewicz-Podbielska H, Pomorska-Mól M (2021) Porcine coronaviruses: overview of the state of the art. Virol Sin 36:833–851
Valenti WC, Barros HP, Moraes-Valenti P, Bueno GW, Cavalli RO (2021) Aquaculture in Brazil: past, present and future. Aquac Rep 19:100611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aqrep.2021.100611
Wang S, He G, Liu Y, Wang Y, Ma Y, Fu C, Xu H, Hu R, Li S (2024) A P1-like MYB transcription factor boosts biosynthesis and transport of C-glycosylated flavones in duckweed. Int J Biol Macromol 277:134138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.134138
Watanabe Y, Bowden TA, Wilson IA, Crispin M (2019) Exploitation of glycosylation in enveloped virus pathobiology. Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj 1863:1480–1497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagen.2019.05.012
Wei C, Hu Z, Wang S, Tan X, Jin Y, Yi Z, He K, Zhao L, Chu Z, Fang Y, Chen S, Liu P, Zhao H (2024) An endogenous promoter LpSUT2 discovered in duckweed: a promising transgenic tool for plants. Front Plant Sci 15:1368284. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2024.1368284
Wu B, Zhang C, Qin X, Shi L, Zhao M (2019) Identification and function of penaeidin 3 and penaeidin 5 in Fenneropenaeus merguiensis. Fish Shellfish Immunol 89:623–631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2019.04.032
Xiao B, Liao X, Wang H, He J, Li C (2021) BigPEN, an antimicrobial peptide of penaeidin family from shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei with membrane permeable and DNA binding activity. Fish Shellfish Immunol 2:100034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsirep.2021.100034
Xu J, Shen Y, Zheng Y, Smith G, Sun XS, Wang D, Zhao Y, Zhang W, Li Y (2023) Duckweed (Lemnaceae) for potentially nutritious human food: a review. Food Rev Int 39:3620–3634. https://doi.org/10.1080/87559129.2021.2012800
Yadav JP, Tomar P, Singh Y, Khurana SK (2022) Insights on Mycoplasma gallisepticum and Mycoplasma synoviae infection in poultry: a systematic review. Anim Biotechnol 33:1711–1720. https://doi.org/10.1080/10495398.2021.1908316
Yamamoto YT, Rajbhandari N, Lin X, Bergmann BA, Nishimura Y, Stomp AM (2001) Genetic transformation of duckweed Lemna gibba and Lemna minor. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 37:349–353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-001-0062-6
Yang J, Zhao X, Li G, Hu S, Hou H (2021) Frond architecture of the rootless duckweed Wolffia globosa. BMC Plant Biol 21:387. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-021-03165-5
Yang L, Luo X, Sun J, Ma X, Ren Q, Wang Y, Wang W, He Y, Li Q, Han B, Yu Y, Sun J (2023) The antimicrobial potential and aquaculture wastewater treatment ability of Penaeidins 3a transgenic Duckweed. Plants 12:1715. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12081715
Yao L, Zhang H, Liu Y, Ji Q, Xie J, Zhang R, Huang L, Mei K, Wang J, Gao W (2022) Engineering of triterpene metabolism and overexpression of the lignin biosynthesis gene PAL promotes ginsenoside Rg3 accumulation in ginseng plant chassis. J Integr Plant Biol 64:1739–1754. https://doi.org/10.1111/jipb.13315
Yoshida A, Taoka KI, Hosaka A, Tanaka K, Kobayashi H, Muranaka T, Toyooka K, Oyama T, Tsuji H (2021) Characterization of frond and flower development and identification of FT and FD genes from duckweed Lemna aequinoctialis Nd. Front Plant Sci 12:2088. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.697206
Yu C, Wu M, Sun L, Li H, Xu Z, Zhang Q, Yi D, Wang L, Zhao D, Hou Y, Wu T (2024) Effect of supplementation with black soldier fly extract on intestinal function in piglets infected with porcine epidemic diarrhea virus. Animals 14:1512. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14101512
Zeng W, Bergmannc SM, Dong H, Yang Y, Wu M, Liu H, Chen Y, Li H (2021) Identification, virulence, and molecular characterization of a recombinant isolate of grass carp reovirus genotype I. Viruses 13:807. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13050807
Zhang W, Xu X, Zhang J, Ye T, Zhou Q, Xu Y, Li W, Hu Z, Shang C (2022) Discovery and characterization of a New Crustin antimicrobial peptide from Amphibalanus amphitrite. Pharmaceutics 14:413. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14020413
Zhao G, Lin Y, Du L, Guan J, Sun S, Sui H, Kou Z, Chan CCS, Guo Y, Jiang S, Zheng B, Zhou Y (2010) An M2e-based multiple antigenic peptide vaccine protects mice from lethal challenge with divergent H5N1 influenza viruses. Virol J 7:9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-422X-7-9
Zhu L, Yuan G, Wang X, Zhao T, Hou L, Li C, Jiang X, Zhang J, Zhao X, Pei C, Li L, Kong X (2022) The construction of a duckweed expression and delivery system for grass carp reovirus VP35. Aquaculture 553:738059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2022.738059
Ziegler P, Adelmann K, Zimmer S, Schmidt C, Appenroth KJ (2015) Relative in vitro growth rates of duckweeds (Lemnaceae)–the most rapidly growing higher plants. Plant Biol 17:33–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/plb.12184
Funding
This study was supported by grants Anca Awal Sembada funded by Institut Teknologi Bandung, grant number: 299/IT1.B07.5/TA/2024.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors affirm that there are no conflicts of interest, financial or personal, that could have influenced the research presented in this paper.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Sembada, A.A., Theda, Y. & Faizal, A. Duckweeds as edible vaccines in the animal farming industry. 3 Biotech 14, 222 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-024-04074-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-024-04074-8