Abstract
The endosymbionts of Symbiodiniaceae members establish an obligate relationship with most of the reef-building corals. Photosynthates of Symbiodiniaceae symbionts provide the maximum energy requirements of the host coral. Apart from the coral growth benefits, the mutual relationship extends to respond the environmental stress as well. Coral-endosymbiont mutualism is affected by various stress factors such as light, salinity, temperature, and eutrophication. However, the coral-algal symbionts adaptation to these rapid environmental changes is not much studied. Algal endosymbionts are classified into nine clades by genus level (major scleractinian corals – Clade A-D). These clades are named A to I with many subclades being presented in each clade that was identified based on the genetic marker ITS sequences, from which few are found tolerant to adverse conditions. This suggested that coral susceptibility or resistance to stress depends on the type of clade they harbor. Also, the prolonged environmental conditions may bring evolutionarily diverse clade lineages enabling corals to attain stress tolerance to temperature, UV, and high salinity. Thus, the present study may aid in understanding the coral-algal mutualistic adaptations under various stress conditions.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Corals are sessile marine invertebrate animals that belong to Phylum cnidarian. Several polyps of coral form a colony and are generally classified as hard coral and soft coral. Their average tolerant level of environmental conditions such as temperature, salinity, nitrate, phosphate, and light is 21.7–29.6 ℃, 28.7–40.4 PSU, 4.51 µmol L-1, 0.63 µmol L-1, and 450 µmol photons m-2 s-1 respectively (Guan et al. 2015). Coral reefs formed by scleractinian corals provide shelter, food, and habitat for at least 25% of known marine species with rich biodiversity (Vanwonterghem and Webster 2020). Also, promotes an economic value of 30.1–37.5 billons USD per annum through coastal protection, tourism, and fisheries (Moberg and Folke 1999; Saxena 2015; Reguero et al. 2018). Hence corals serve as food resources, and economic importance, and exhibit ecological services (Moberg and Folke 1999).
Photosynthetic dinoflagellates (Symbiodinium) of Reef corals live in the coral tissues and belong to the Symbiodiniaceae family commonly called Zooxanthellae. These dinoflagellates, form symbiosis with cnidarians such as corals, sea anemones, and jellyfish and would not exist freely in the external nutrient-poor water environment (LaJeunesse 2002). Corals and their algae hold a symbiotic association of mutualistic relationship by which both species get benefitted from each other (Suggett et al. 2017; Roth 2014). The photosynthetic components of zooxanthellae, such as glycerol, glucose, and amino acids are transferred to coral (Yellowlees et al. 2008). The corals assimilate these compounds like proteins, fats, and carbohydrates and produce calcium carbonate in the process of reef-building (Goreau et al. 1979). Through this symbiotic association, the endosymbiotic algae produce organic nutrients and transfer 95% of their energy to corals (Muscatine 1990). This photoautotrophic nutrition, performed by the endosymbiotic algae is of prime benefit to the coral host. This facilitates the inorganic carbon transport, which acts as a source of phosphate, nitrogen, and other inorganic nutrients through the host tissues. Thereby the symbiotic algae uptakes the metabolic breakdown products and CO2 from corals (Yellowlees et al. 2008). Thus, the presence of Symbiodinium species reaching densities of about several million or more per square centimeter of coral tissue aids the survival, productivity, and success of their hosts (Muscatine and Porter 1977; LaJeunesse 2002; Yellowlees et al. 2008). At the same time, climate change, especially the temperature rise combined with human dependence on reef resources damage the coral–dinoflagellate interactions leading to coral decline worldwide. However, coral species are demonstrated for more tolerant of environmental stress with the capability of developing the adaptive features among all invertebrates and dinoflagellate symbiosis (Warner et al. 1996). Hence coral growth and productivity depend on the symbiosis with its endosymbiotic dinoflagellates also known as Symbiodinium (Muscatine 1990; Muscatine and Porter 1977; Yellowlees et al. 2008). Thereupon gathering the reported facts of the coral and its Symbiodinium is pivotal and this review majorly focuses on the various clades of Symbiodinium together with their merits to its coral host.
2 Coral and dinoflagellates
In highly oligotrophic conditions, the association between the photosynthetic dinoflagellates and corals is an important key to the growth of stony corals and reef ecosystem success (Ziegler et al. 2018). Corals provide a protected environment and CO2 to algae for photosynthesis, and algae provide photosynthetic products for the coral to induce metabolic activity and cellular respiration (Suggett et al. 2017; Roth 2014). The symbiosis establishment between coral and algae was demonstrated through cellular signals such as MAMP-PRR (Microbe-Associated Molecular Pattern – Pattern Recognition Receptors) via algal glycan and host-lectin interaction (Davy et al. 2012). Cell surfaces of Symbiodinium clades A, B, D, E, and F were consistently identified with glycan residues N-Acetyl and mannose (Logan et al. 2010). Both the MAMPs are well characterized for their binding properties with PRR lectins (McGuinness et al. 2003). Similarly, three lectin types were identified with symbiotic corals such as Montastraea faveolata (Schwarz et al. 2008), Sinularia lochomodes (Jimbo et al. 2000), and Ctenactis echinata (Jimbo et al. 2010). Besides, PdC lectin from Pocillopora damicornis (Vidal-Dupiol et al. 2009) and millectin from Acropora millepora (Kvennefors et al. 2008) was elucidated for their putative involvement in symbiotic recognition Jimbo et al. 2000, 2010; Kvennefors et al. 2008; Schwarz et al. 2008; Vidal-Dupiol et al. 2009). However, cnidarians have several PRRs, apart from lectins such as Toll like receptors (TLRs), Nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain protein (NODs), scavenge receptors, and complement receptors as present in vertebrates, which could also involve in cnidarian-dinoflagellate symbiotic partnership (Davy et al. 2012). On account of these mutualistic symbiotic associations, the corals attain a high capacity to tolerate various environmental conditions (Silverstein et al. 2015). Also, the UV radiation exposures combined with thermal stress are been recognized as a major abiotic factor that leads to coral bleaching. In such instances, the mutualistic symbioses of photosynthetic dinoflagellates of some Symbiodinium clades act photoprotective by the synthesis of mycosporine-like amino acids (UV absorbing compound) (Fig. 1) (Hoegh-Guldberg and jones 1999; Rosic and Dove 2011).
In Cnidarian-algal symbioses, the symbionts are transferred to the coral host, either by vertical or horizontal transmission with each new host generation (Barneah et al. 2004). Symbionts are directly carried from parent to offspring host through vertical transmission, while in horizontal, the host progeny acquires its symbiont from the surrounding environment (Barneah et al. 2004; Byler et al. 2013). That is, the coral larvae acquire their symbiont from the environment immediately after their substrate settlement and metamorphosis. Various researches of past decades had viewed that the Symbiodinium and coral host pairings are diverse (Ziegler et al. 2018). Also, rare cryptic Symbiodinium diversity contributes to coral for their potential functions that provide environmental resilience to coral holobiont (Ziegler et al. 2018). Likewise, a study from the northern red sea had noticed that the endosymbiotic algae are highly host-specific and exhibit high thermal tolerance even in extreme conditions in that region (Osman et al. 2020). These unicellular dinoflagellates are classified into 9 clades (A-I) with subclades of distinct phylogeny based upon their ribosomal chloroplast and nuclear genes (Pochon and gates 2010; Pochon et al. 2006; Santos et al. 2002). Still every year, some aspects of Symbiodinium diversity are reported, confirming their genetic variations to be abundant and broad (LaJeunesse et al. 2018).
3 Factors affecting coral Symbiodinium and their response
Several of the planet’s ecosystems are badly impacted due to rapid climate change, destructing various key ecological processes including primary production, respiration, energy, carbon and nutrient flow through food webs, reproduction, and decomposition that affects organisms of broad range in diverse geographical distributions (Walther et al. 2002). Especially coral reefs are vastly affected due to their extreme sensitivity to prolonged UV stress, temperature stress, salinity, and eutrophication (Muscatine et al. 1998; Coles and Brown 2003; Fitt et al. 2001). Series of events that occur under UV stress include a decrease in the evolution of photosynthetic oxygen, Chlorophyll a, growth rate, carbon-nitrogen ratios, and Rubisco enzyme activity (Lesser 1996; Banazak and Trench 1995). Particularly temperatures of a few degrees higher involve significant loss of mutualistic dinoflagellates from coral tissues leading to coral bleaching (Jones and Berkelmans 2010; Porter et al. 1989). This phylogenetic incompatibility among the symbiont phylogenies and host had indicated that over evolutionary time scales such partnerships do change (Rowan and Powers 1991; LaJeunesse 2002). However, in coincidence with the adaptive radiations and persistent environmental conditions lasting for a thousand or millions of years, the Symbiodinium lineages (clades) of evolutionary divergent had acquired ecological dominance, as suggested by global phylogeographic patterns (Rowan and Powers 1991; LaJeunesse 2002). It is also been proposed that severe coral bleaching instances may hasten changes between coral populations so that individual colonies will take in thermal tolerant symbionts (Baker 2001; Baker et al. 2015). Thereupon, it was studied that Symbiodinium plays a major role in the adaptation of corals during rapid environmental changes. For example, the corals such as Acropora sp., Galaxea fascicularis, Platygyra lamellina, and Sarcophyton glaucum of the tropical and subtropical region of the northern south china were observed for their adaptation to environmental conditions (temperature and nutrient inflow) by changing Symbiodinium clades or subclades (Gong et al. 2018). To tolerate such environmental conditions, they take up a greater number of Symbiodinium clade D, which are thermal tolerant (Gong et al. 2018). Symbiodinium clade D is mostly found highly distributed in extremely hot regions (Berekelmans and Van Oppen 2006). Similarly, the corals ability in shuffling the Symbiodinium clades/types based on the environmental condition was observed in addition to the resistant Symbiodinium clades to overcome mainly seawater temperature fluctuations (LaJeunesse 2004a; Thornhill et al. 2006). Also, due to directional selection, new coral host Symbiodinium combinations may arise (Keshavmurthy et al. 2017). Likewise, the coral Porites lutea can also adapt to various environmental conditions through host-specific Symbiodinium subclades such as C15, C15.6, and C91. Also, under critical conditions such as in nuclear power plant effluents, the corals are observed to change their subclades of Symbiodinium from stress-sensitive subclades to stress-tolerant subclades (from C1 and C3 to D1a) (Keshavmurthy et al. 2014). Although the shuffling of clades to the thermal tolerance is known, field studies have not yet clearly demonstrated the maximum spread of shuffling in a location, such as all corals have the ability to shuffle symbiont types or any ecological benefits due to the new addition of symbiont association with the host (Jones and Berkelmans 2010). However, experimental analysis in Acropora millepora on the growth rates measurement revealed that corals with D type symbionts grew slower than corals with C type symbionts due to the acclimatization process to the warmer conditions by changing to more thermally tolerant type D (Jones and Berkelmans 2010).
The Symbiodiniaceae association is influenced by depth as well which is appeared to be dependent on both region and coral species. In such instances, the shallow coral communities exhibit high dinoflagellate diversity than the samples beyond 16 m depths that were observed in Belize among the coral Montastraea cavernosa. Hence these symbionts might be depth specialized communities over the depths of 40–60 m (Eckert et al. 2020). Likewise, high salinity is observed to convey extraordinarily higher thermotolerance and with an increase in salinity, the bleaching severity is reduced in high saline environments like the Persian/Arabian Gulf (PAG) and Red sea which is dependent on specific host strain and symbiont type (Gegner et al. 2017). These corals from PAG are associated with Symbiodinium thermophilum which exhibits strong local adaptation to high temperature and exceptional high salinity and this heat tolerance is lost when the corals are exposed to low salinity levels (D’Angelo et al. 2015). Similar to other stress factors, the photobiology of four different Symbiodinium is also studied for photoacclimation and thermal stress. Where the Symbiodinium of clade F isolated from the coral Meandrina meandrites had exhibited great capacity of photoacclimation with growth at high temperature and light (Robison and warner 2006).
4 Symbiodinium and clades in a scleractinian coral
Endosymbiotic algae Symbiodinium is classified into nine clades or groups by genus level by the development of molecular tools and next-generation sequencing. These clades are named A to I with many subclades being presented in each clade through the understanding of their taxonomic distribution which was identified based on the genetic marker ITS 2 sequences (Pochon and Gates 2010; Coffroth and Santos 2005). Among all the nine clades (A-I), the genus names were established recently to seven genera (A-G) (Leveque et al. 2019). The phylogenetic analysis of these Symbiodinium clades (A-G) are reported into seven genera based on their molecular, morphological, physiological, and ecological findings into Symbiodinium as clade A, Breviolum as clade B, Cladocopium as clade C, Durusdinium as clade D, Effrenium as clade E, Fugacium as clade F and Gerakladium as clade G (LaJeunesse et al. 2018). A majority of these clades such as clades A, B, C, and D (Table 1) are associated with the hard corals (Liu et al. 2018). Among them clades A to D, are majorly found in the scleractinian coral, clade E is found in Anemone (Anthopleura elegantissima), clade F is found in foraminifera (Sorites sp., Amphisorus hemprichii, Montipora verrucosa and Marginopora sp.) and rarely in scleractinian coral (Alveopora japonica), clade G is present in foraminifera (Sorites sp., Marginopora vertebralis. and M. kudakajimaensis), sponges (Cliona orientalis), octocoral (Junceella fragilis, Euplexaura nuttingi and Stereonephthya sp.) and rarely distributed in hard coral (Stylophora pistillata) and clade H (Sorites sp. and Amphisorus sp.) are found only in foraminifera (Pochon and Pawlowski 2006; Pochon et al. 2007). Each clade can be located in its particular environment conditions for instance clade A and B mostly prefers to locate in shallow-water corals (Chen et al. 2003), clade C abundantly occurs in greater depths and photic zones (Innis et al. 2018), and clade D is mainly located in the places of high thermal conditions (Thronhill et al. 2005; Chen et al. 2003). Thus, among all the endosymbiotic clades discussed, the genus Cladocopium (Clade C) is highly distributed around the reef environments LaJeunesse 2001; Magalon et al. 2007; Lien et al. 2012; Yang et al. 2012; Tong et al. 2014) (Table 1). Besides, the spatial and geographic distribution also determines the coral-algal association (Tan et al. 2020). For example, Symbiodinium (clade A), Breviolum (clade B), and Fugacium (formerly clade F) are more prevalent at higher latitudes, while Cladocopium (Clade C) is dominant in tropical Eastern-Pacific regions (Baker and Rowan 1997), while across the Caribbean Breviolum is dominant but rare or absent in the Indo-Pacific (Lewis et al. 2018).
Interestingly, more than one clade or subclade is also observed in one individual host (Table 2). The coral host Platygyra daedalea is found to harbor more than one clade such as clades A, B, and C in their tissues of samples collected in April, May, and July 2008 from the inshore and offshore reefs of the north of the Arabian Gulf (Mahmoud and Sarraf 2016). But Reports from inshore and offshore reef systems in Kuwait showed that P. daedalea suffered 100% damage in response to temperature, while the other coral species reported damages between 20 and 97% (Mahmoud and Sarraf 2016). Also, in the temperate region of Japan, the genotype clades C and D are harbored in coral Oulastrea crispata (Faviidae family) and the coral Alveopora japonica is observed to harbor clades C and F (Poritidae family). Thereby, clade C was found to dominate over 58 coral species of the region (Lien et al. 2012). In the Pacific, corals Pocillopora damicornis are harbored with subclade C1 and clade D, A (Magalon et al. 2007) (Table 2).
5 Symbiodinium and clades in octocorals
Worldwide tropical Octocorals are reported to harbor five Symbiodinium clades such as clades A, B, C, D, and G (Goulet et al. 2008) (Table 3). The clade identity of dinoflagellates in soft coral hosts (Eilat, Red sea) has been investigated in relation to their hosts mode of acquisition of symbionts (Barneah et al. 2004). That is, all hosts using vertical transmission distinctly harbored dinoflagellates belonging to clade A while those with horizontal transmission harbored endosymbionts belonging to clade C (Barneah et al. 2004). Among the other clades, clade D can tolerate high thermal conditions. Based on their distribution among corals, Symbiodinium clade C is found to be more dominant than other clades of Symbiodiniaceae (LaJeunesse et al. 2018). Australian reefs are studied to hold higher diversity of Symbiodinium clade C than the other regions and a lower density of clade D is distributed together with some of clade G (Van Oppen et al. 2005). Likewise, a higher density of Clade B is distributed in the regions of Bahamas, Panama, and Mexico. Interestingly, in the reefs of Australia both clades C and D are harbored together in the same host species such as Cladiella spp and Klyxum spp. (LaJeunesse et al. 2004a; Van Oppen et al. 2005). Also, clades B and C are harbored by octocorals Erythropodium caribaeorum and Briareum asbestinum in Barbados, Bahamas, and other tropical regions (Santos et al. 2001; Goulet and Coffroth 2004). Similarly, the octocoral Nephthea spp and Tubipora musica of Israel and Australia are observed to harbor four clades such as A, B, C, and D (Goulet et al. 2008) and two clades such as C and D (Van Oppen et al. 2005) respectively (Table 4).
6 Symbiodinium association with other species
Endosymbiotic dinoflagellate exhibits symbiotic association with other species as well, such as clams, sponges, foraminifera, sea anemones, and sea jelly. Sea anemones of northern Persian Gulf islands harbored a greater number of Symbiodinium clade C as their habitat is in the intertidal region (Moghaddam et al. 2018). Hence Symbiodinium clade C is highly tolerant to environmental conditions like higher water column temperature and direct sunlight exposure during low tide (Moghaddam et al. 2018). Marine sponges belong to the Phylum Porifera. The attractive color of the sponges represents their association with the Symbiodiniaceae family. Symbiodinium clade G is harbored by sponges of the Western Pacific and western Atlantic oceans (Ramsby et al. 2017). From the island of Guam, the Micronesia reef region has revealed a high density of Symbiodinium clades and subclades in foraminifera species (Sorites sp., Amphisorus kudakajimaensis, A. hemprichii, and Marginopora sp.). Symbiodinium clades C, D, F, G, and H are harbored in foraminifera species and many subclades are also associated with that species (Pochon et al. 2007). The study of Symbiodinium distribution in giant clams from Indonesia reported clades A, C, and D as widely distributed in giant clams. Where 42% of clams harbored multiple clades in an individual and 15% of clams had harbored various types of sub-clades from a single clade (DeBoer et al. 2012). Also, Symbiodinium clade C and D were present in high-level temperature conditions, and clade A was found in low-temperature conditions. Thus, clades C and D could tolerate high temperatures than clade A (DeBoer et al. 2012). Sea jelly is also associated with endosymbiotic algae but their clade distribution is low with the host than the other species. In the presence of Symbiodinium, sea jelly tentacles exhibit various color morphs and in their polyp stages, Sea jelly is capable to directly uptake the Symbiodinium from the water column. Thereby the sea jelly of the Red sea exclusively harbored Symbiodinium clade A1 (Lampert 2016).
7 Discussion
Coral reef ecosystems are biodiversity hotspots of huge economical value and biological diversity, providing habitats to one-third of marine species (Plaisance et al. 2011). These reef-building corals turn up for symbiosis with photosynthetic dinoflagellates (Muscatin and Porter 1977) and these endosymbiont dinoflagellates power up the coral reefs and stony coral growth (LaJeunesse et al. 2018). Corals relationship to dinoflagellates determines the system’s response to varied environmental stress, besides the reef growth (deposits of calcium carbonate) (Muscatin and Porter 1977). Their relationship is greatly sensitive to stress such as increased salinity, temperature, nutrients, and solar irradiances that diminish photosynthetic efficiency and augment reactive oxygen species generation. Which, when not being detoxified by the host ROS (Reactive oxygen species) scavengers and antioxidants, can eventually attribute to coral bleaching events due to their endosymbiont’s loss (Ochsenkuhn et al. 2017). Past research had discovered that the coral susceptibility to stress depends on the type of clade they harbor (Rosic and Dove 2011). Varied host and symbiont combinations can provide ecological advantages in different niches, as the symbiont type could influence the coral growth rate (Little et al. 2004) and their potential to get through acute stress (Baker 2001). It is suggested that the prolonged environmental conditions had brought evolutionarily diverse Symbiodinium or clade lineages (Rowan and Powers 1991; LaJeunesse 2002). Likely, coral with thermal tolerant symbiont clade D is more resistant to elevated temperatures (Berkelmans and Van Oppen 2006; Desalvo et al. 2010; Reynolds et al. 2008). The adult corals are capable of attaining increased tolerance that results from the change in the dominant Symbiodinium clade C to D in their tissues and the level of thermal tolerance gained would be around 1-1.5 °C (Berkelmans and Van Oppen 2006). This Symbiont shuffling is by the already existing type present in coral tissues and not from exogenous environmental uptake (Berkelmans and Van Oppen 2006).
Various investigations had explored the expression of heat shock proteins (Hsp70 and Hsp90) of endosymbiont as a response to thermal stress. HSPs (Heat shock proteins) are molecular chaperones that prevent cellular damage in the circumstances of environmental stress (Rosic et al. 2011). They maintain regular cellular functions such as protein folding, degradation, unfolding, transport, and aggregation (Sorensen et al. 2003), where these conserved proteins carry out cell signaling, cell differentiation, and morphogenesis, cell protection against apoptosis and stress (Beissinger and Buchner 1998; Arya et al. 2007). HSPs are up-regulated during exposure to short-term stress or elevated temperature conditions (Rosic et al. 2011). Compared to the HSPs of coral host, their algal symbiont’s HSPs holds potential superior adaptations to thermal stress (Csaszar et al. 2010). In A. millepora, a reef-building coral, their Symbiodinium genotype is evaluated to influence strongly the coral holobiont fitness by survival, growth, and thermal tolerance (Mieog et al. 2009).
The distribution of coral species is largely correlated based on prevailing temperature and light gradients. Thus, influenced by light tolerance and photosynthetic properties of coral symbionts (host-symbiont specificity) in their biogeographic distribution Iglesias-Prieto et al. 2004; LaJeunesse 2002; LaJeunesse et al. 2003; LaJeunesse et al. 2004) (Fig. 1). Hence predominant clades of the Symbiodinium phylotypes such as A, B, C, and D together with their host are observed in characteristic depths (LaJeunesse et al. 2002; Thornhill et al. 2006). Thereupon shallow-water corals are prevalent with Clade A Symbiodinium that produces the mycosporine-like amino acids (MAA) (UV protective) in abundance (Fig. 1). While other clades with depth correlation produce hospice amounts of MAA, especially, mycosporine glycine that absorbs UV-B radiations effectively (LaJeunesse et al. 2002; Banaszak et al. 2006). Mycosporine-like amino acids are water-soluble components, composed of cyclohexanone chromophores bound to amino acid residues. They are characterized to possess a maximum absorbance at UVA and UVB ranges (310–362 nm) and hold photoprotective, antioxidant scavenging and suppress singlet oxygen-induced damages (Rosic and Dove 2011; Hoegh-Guldberg and Jones 1999) (Fig. 1). Likely, photoinhibition accelerated due to elevated temperatures, which underlies bleaching in corals. In response to this, Symbiodinium of Clade A display improved competencies for alternative photosynthetic electron transport pathways. Symbiodinium of Clade A undergoes light-induced antenna complex dissociation from reaction centers of photosystem II, which promotes survival of Clade A associated cnidarians at higher light intensities (Fig. 1). Thereby conferring resistance to bleaching (Reynolds et al. 2008). Similarly, the coral-Symbiodinium associations found in the Red Sea and Persian/Arabian gulf represent coral habitats in most saline environments. Investigations of such corals and Symbiodinium had revealed that the cells exposed to higher salinity had synthesized higher levels of osmolyte floridoside called osmolyte 2-O-glycerol-α-galactopyranoside, found in both in vitro and the host coral animals (Ochsenkuhn et al. 2017). Thereby such coral and Symbiodinium cells serve a dual function as a compatible organic osmolyte and a reactive oxygen species scavenger (Ochsenkuhn et al. 2017). Also, coral Symbiodinium serves diagnostics through the lipid composition too. The lipid composition of the Symbiodinium thylakoid membrane acts as an important determinate of insensitivity to thermal stress. The lipid saturation in the thylakoid membrane reveals a critical threshold temperature that separates the sensitive species of zooxanthellae from the tolerant ones. Thus, lipid composition is a potential diagnostic of the thermally induced bleaching observed in scleractinian corals (Tchernov et al. 2004).
8 Conclusions
Coral reefs are biologically diverse and thus pose huge economical value. Relationship of coral with dinoflagellates gears their productivity. These endosymbionts are classified into several clades that serve a major role in coral sustenance under adverse conditions. They exhibit different stages of tolerance to stress. For example, Symbiodinium clades C and D that are present in a high level of temperature conditions were identified and recognized as temperature tolerant clades. At critical conditions, the corals are observed to change their subclades from stress-sensitive subclades to stress-tolerant subclades. Clade A of Symbiodinium had displayed UV protection at instances of high irradiances and some other clades are found to be osmotolerant, gained through adaptation in higher saline environmental conditions. Hence an intricate observation into the coral symbiont relationship and the implementation of in vitro transmission studies of stress-tolerant clades into coral hosts would serve beneficial to achieving coral resilience under various stress conditions.
Code availability
Not applicable.
Change history
28 June 2022
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13199-022-00852-1
References
Arya R, Mallik M, Lakhotia SC (2007) Heat shock genes—integrating cell survival and death. J Biosci 32(3):595–610
Baker AC (2001) Reef corals bleach to survive change. Nature 411(6839):765–766
Baker AC, Rowan R (1997) Diversity of symbiotic dinoflagellates (zooxanthellae) in scleractinian corals of the Caribbean and eastern Pacific. InProc 8th Int Coral Reef Symp 2:1301–1306
Baker DM, Freeman CJ, Knowlton N, Thacker RW, Kim K, Fogel ML (2015) Productivity links morphology, symbiont specificity and bleaching in the evolution of Caribbean octocoral symbioses. ISME J 9(12):2620–2629
Banaszak AT, Santos MG, LaJeunesse TC, Lesser MP (2006) The distribution of mycosporine-like amino acids (MAAs) and the phylogenetic identity of symbiotic dinoflagellates in cnidarian hosts from the Mexican Caribbean. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 337(2):131–146
Banaszak AT, Trench RK (1995) Effects of ultraviolet (UV) radiation on marine microalgal-invertebrate symbioses. I. Response of the algal symbionts in culture and in hospite. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 194:213–232.1
Barneah O, Weis VM, Perez S, Benayahu Y (2004) Diversity of dinoflagellate symbionts in Red Sea soft corals: mode of symbiont acquisition matters. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 275:89–95
Beissinger M, Buchner J (1998) How chaperones fold proteins. Biol Chem 379(3):245–259
Berkelmans R, Van Oppen MJ (2006) The role of zooxanthellae in the thermal tolerance of corals: a ‘nugget of hope for coral reefs in an era of climate change. Proc. Royal Soc. B. 273(1599):2305–12
Byler KA, Carmi-Veal M, Fine M, Goulet TL (2013) Multiple symbiont acquisition strategies as an adaptive mechanism in the coral Stylophora pistillata. PLoS ONE 8(3):e59596
Chen CA, Lam KK, Nakano Y, Tsai WS (2003) “A stable association of the stress-tolerant zooxanthellae, Symbiodinium clade D, with the low-temperature-tolerant coral, Oulastrea crispata (Scleractinia: Faviidae) in subtropical non-reefal coral communities” Zool. Stud 42(4):540–550
Coffroth MA, Santos SR (2005) Genetic diversity of symbiotic dinoflagellates in the genus Symbiodinium. Protist 156:19–34
Coles SL, Brown BE (2003) Coral bleaching—capacity for acclimatization and adaptation.“Adv. Mar. Biol. 183–223
Csaszar NB, Ralph PJ, Frankham R, Berkelmans R, van Oppen MJ (2010) Estimating the potential for adaptation of corals to climate warming. PLoS ONE 5(3):9751
Davy SK, Allemand D, Weis VM (2012) Cell biology of cnidarian-dinoflagellate symbiosis. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 76(2):229–261
D’Angelo C, Hume BC, Burt J, Smith EG, Achterberg EP, Wiedenmann J (2015) Local adaptation constrains the distribution potential of heat-tolerant Symbiodinium from the Persian/Arabian Gulf. ISME J 9(12):2551–2560
DeBoer TS, Baker AC, Erdmann MV, Jones PR, Barber PH (2012) Patterns of Symbiodinium distribution in three giant clam species across the biodiverse Bird’s Head region of Indonesia Mar. Ecol Prog Ser 444:117–132
DeSalvo MK, Sunagawa S, Fisher PL, Voolstra CR, Iglesias-Prieto R, Medina M (2010) Coral host transcriptomic states are correlated with Symbiodinium genotypes. Mol Ecol 19(6):1174–1186
Eckert RJ, Reaume AM, Sturm AB, Studivan MS, Voss JD (2020) Depth influences Symbiodiniaceae associations among Montastraea cavernosa corals on the Belize Barrier Reef. Front microbiol 11:518
Fitt WK, Brown BE, Warner ME, Dunne RP (2001) Coral bleaching: interpretation of thermal tolerance limits and thermal thresholds in tropical corals. Coral Reefs 20(1):51–65
Gegner HM, Ziegler M, Rädecker N, Buitrago-López C, Aranda M, Voolstra CR (2017) High salinity conveys thermotolerance in the coral model Aiptasia. Biol Open 6(12):1943–1948
Gong S, Chai G, Xiao Y, Xu L, Yu K, Li J, Liu F, Cheng H, Zhang F, Liao B, Li Z (2018) Flexible symbiotic associations of Symbiodinium with five typical coral species in tropical and subtropical reef regions of the northern South China Sea. Front. Microbiol. 2485
Goreau TF, Goreau NI, Goreau TJ (1979) Corals and coral reefs. Sci Am 241(2):124–137
Goulet TL, Coffroth MA (2004) The genetic identity of dinoflagellate symbionts in Caribbean octocorals. Coral Reefs 23(4):465–472
Goulet TL, Simmons C, Goulet D (2008) Worldwide biogeography of Symbiodinium in tropical octocorals. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 355:45–58
Guan Y, Hohn S, Merico A (2015) Suitable environmental ranges for potential coral reef habitats in the tropical ocean. PLoS ONE 10(6):0128831
Hoegh-Guldberg O, Jones RJ (1999) Photoinhibition and photoprotection in symbiotic dinoflagellates from reef-building corals. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 183:73–86
Iglesias-Prieto R, Beltran VH, LaJeunesse TC, Reyes-Bonilla H, Thome PE (2004) Different algal symbionts explain the vertical distribution of dominant reef corals in the eastern Pacific. Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 271(1549):1757–63
Innis T, Cunning R, Ritson-Williams R, Wall CB, Gates RD (2018) Coral color and depth drive symbiosis ecology of Montipora capitata in Kāne ‘ohe Bay, O ‘ahu, Hawai ‘i. Coral Reefs 37(2):423–430
Jimbo M, Yanohara T, Koike K, Koike K, Sakai R, Muramoto K, Kamiya H (2000) The d-galactose binding lectin of the octocoral Sinularia lochmodes: characterization and possible relationship to the symbiotic dinoflagellates. Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol 125:227–236
Jimbo M, Yamashita H, Koike K, Sakai R, Kamiya H (2010) Effects of lectin in the scleractinian coral Ctenactis echinata on symbiotic zooxanthellae. Fish Sci 76:355–363
Jones A, Berkelmans R (2010) Potential costs of acclimatization to a warmer climate: growth of a reef coral with heat tolerant vs. sensitive symbiont types. PLoS ONE 5(5):10437
Keshavmurthy S, Meng PJ, Wang JT, Kuo CY, Yang SY, Hsu CM, Gan CH, Dai CF, Chen CA (2014) Can resistant coral-Symbiodinium associations enable coral communities to survive climate change? A study of a site exposed to long-term hot water input. PeerJ 8(2):327
Keshavmurthy S, Tang KH, Hsu CM, Gan CH, Kuo CY, Soong K, Chou HN, Chen CA (2017) Symbiodinium spp. associated with scleractinian corals from Dongsha Atoll (Pratas), Taiwan, in the South China Sea. PeerJ 5:e2871
Kvennefors ECE, Leggat W, Hoegh-Guldberg O, Degnan BM, Barnes AC (2008) An ancient and variable mannose-binding lectin from the coral Acropora millepora binds both pathogens and symbionts. Dev Comp Immunol 32:1582–1592
LaJeunesse TC (2001) Investigating the biodiversity, ecology, and phylogeny of endosymbiotic dinoflagellates in the genus Symbiodinium using the ITS region: in search of a “species” level marker. J Phycol 37:866–880
LaJeunesse TJ (2002) Diversity and community structure of symbiotic dinoflagellates from Caribbean coral reefs. Mar Biol 141(2):387–400
LaJeunesse TC, Bhagooli R, Hidaka M, DeVantier L, Done T, Schmidt GW, Fitt WK, Hoegh-Guldberg O (2004a) Closely related Symbiodinium spp. differ in relative dominance in coral reef host communities across environmental, latitudinal and biogeographic gradients. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 284:147–161
LaJeunesse TC, Loh WK, Van Woesik R, Hoegh-Guldberg O, Schmidt GW, Fitt WK (2003) Low symbiont diversity in southern Great Barrier Reef corals, relative to those of the Caribbean. Limnol Oceanogr 48(5):2046–2054
LaJeunesse TC, Parkinson JE, Gabrielson PW, Jeong HJ, Reimer JD, Voolstra CR, Santos SR (2018) Systematic revision of Symbiodiniaceae highlights the antiquity and diversity of coral endosymbionts. Curr Biol 28(16):2570–2580
LaJeunesse TC, Thornhill DJ, Cox EF, Stanton FG, Fitt WK, Schmidt GW (2004b) High diversity and host specificity observed among symbiotic dinoflagellates in reef coral communities from Hawaii. Coral Reefs 23(4):596–603
Lampert KP (2016) Cassiopea and its zooxanthellae. book: The Cnidaria, past, present and future. Springer, Cham, pp 415–423
Lesser MP (1996) Elevated temperatures and ultraviolet radiation cause oxidative stress and inhibit photosynthesis in Symbiotic dinoflagellates. Limnol Oceanogr 41(2):271–283
Leveque S, Afiq-Rosli L, Ip YC, Jain SS, Huang D (2019) Searching for phylogenetic patterns of Symbiodiniaceae community structure among Indo-Pacific Merulinidae corals. PeerJ 7:e7669
Lewis AM, Chan AN, LaJeunesse TC (2018) New species of closely related endosymbiotic dinoflagellates in the Greater Caribbean have niches corresponding to host coral phylogeny. J Eukaryot Microbiol 66:469–482
Lien YT, Fukami H, Yamashita Y (2012) Symbiodinium clade C dominates zooxanthellate corals (Scleractinia) in the temperate region of Japan. Zool Sci 29(3):173–180
Little AF, Van Oppen MJ, Willis BL (2004) Flexibility in algal endosymbiosis shapes growth in reef corals. Science 304(5676):1492–1494
Logan DDK, LaFlamme AC, Weis VM, Davy SK (2010) Flow cytometric characterizaion of the cell-surface glycans of symbiotic dinoflagellates (Symbiodinium spp.). J Phycol 46:525–533
Magalon H, Flot JF, Baudry E (2007) Molecular identification of symbiotic dinoflagellates in Pacific corals in the genus Pocillopora. Coral Reefs 26(3):551–558
Mahmoud HM, Al-Sarraf M (2016) Molecular phylogeny and community fingerprinting of coral-associated Symbiodinium north of the Arabian Gulf. Mar Pollut Bull 108(1–2):94–104
McGuinness DH, Dehal PK, Pleass RJ (2003) Pattern recognition molecules and innate immunity to parasites. Trends Parasitol 19:312–319
Mieog JC, Olsen JL, Berkelmans R, Bleuler-Martinez SA, Willis BL, van Oppen MJ (2009) The roles and interactions of symbiont, host and environment in defining coral fitness. PLoS ONE 4(7):e6364
Moberg F, Folke C (1999) Ecological goods and services of coral reef ecosystems. Ecol Econ 29(2):215–233
Moghaddam S, Shokri MR, Rajabi-Maham H (2018) Clade C Symbiodinium in dominant sea anemones off Qeshm and Hengam islands in the northern Persian Gulf, Iran. Reg Stud Mar Sci 24:10–16
Muscatine L (1990) The role of symbiotic algae in carbon and energy flux in reef corals. Coral reefs 75–87
Muscatine L, Ferrier-Pages C, Blackburn A, Gates RD, Baghdasarian G, Allemand D (1998) Cell-specific density of symbiotic dinoflagellates in tropical anthozoans. Coral Reefs 17(4):329–337
Muscatine LE, Porter JW (1977) Reef corals: mutualistic symbioses adapted to nutrient-poor environments. Bioscience 27(7):454–460
Ochsenkuhn MA, Röthig T, D’Angelo C, Wiedenmann J, Voolstra CR (2017) The role of floridoside in osmoadaptation of coral-associated algal endosymbionts to high-salinity conditions. Sci Adv 3(8):e1602047
Osman EO, Suggett DJ, Voolstra CR, Pettay DT, Clark DR, Pogoreutz C, Sampayo EM, Warner ME, Smith DJ (2020) Coral microbiome composition along the northern Red Sea suggests high plasticity of bacterial and specificity of endosymbiotic dinoflagellate communities. Microbiome 8(1):1–6
Plaisance L, Caley MJ, Brainard RE, Knowlton N (2011) The diversity of coral reefs: what are we missing? PLoS ONE 6(10):e25026
Pochon X, Gates RD (2010) A new Symbiodinium clade (Dinophyceae) from Soritid foraminifera in Hawaii. Mol Phylogenet Evol 56(1):492–497
Pochon X, Pawlowski J (2006) Evolution of the soritids-Symbiodinium symbiosis. Symbiosis 42(2):77–88
Pochon X, Montoya-Burgos JI, Stadelmann B, Pawlowski J (2006) Molecular phylogeny, evolutionary rates, and divergence timing of the symbiotic dinoflagellate genus Symbiodinium. Mol Phylogenet Evol 38:20–30
Pochon X, Garcia-Cuetos L, Baker AC, Castella E, Pawlowski J (2007) One-year survey of a single Micronesian reef reveals extraordinarily rich diversity of Symbiodinium types in soritid foraminifera. Coral Reefs 26(4):867–882
Porter JW, Fitt WK, Spero HJ, Rogers CS, White MW (1989) Bleaching in reef corals: physiological and stable isotopic responses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 86(23):9342–6
Ramsby BD, Hill MS, Thornhill DJ, Steenhuizen SF, Achlatis M, Lewis AM, LaJeunesse TC (2017) Sibling species of mutualistic Symbiodinium clade G from bioeroding sponges in the western Pacific and western Atlantic oceans. J Phycol 53(5):951–960
Reguero BG, Beck MW, Agostini VN, Kramer P, Hancock B (2018) Coral reefs for coastal protection: A new methodological approach and engineering case study in Grenada. J Environ Manage 210:146–161
Reynolds JM, Bruns BU, Fitt WK, Schmidt GW (2008) Enhanced photoprotection pathways in symbiotic dinoflagellates of shallow-water corals and other cnidarians. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 105(36):13674–8
Robison JD, Warner ME (2006) Differential impacts of photoacclimation and thermal stress on the photobiology of four different phylotypes of Symbiodinium (pyrrhophyta). J Phycol 42(3):568–579
Rosic NN, Dove S (2011) Mycosporine-like amino acids from coral dinoflagellates. Appl Environ Microbiol 77(24):8478–8486
Rosic NN, Pernice M, Dove S, Dunn S, Hoegh-Guldberg O (2011) Gene expression profiles of cytosolic heat shock proteins Hsp70 and Hsp90 from symbiotic dinoflagellates in response to thermal stress: possible implications for coral bleaching. Cell Stress Chaperones 16(1):69–80
Roth MS (2014) The engine of the reef: photobiology of the coral-algal symbiosis. Front Microbiol 5:422
Santos SR, Taylor DJ, Coffroth MA (2001) Genetic comparisons of freshly isolated versus cultured symbiotic dinoflagellates: implications for extrapolating to the intact symbiosis. J Phycol 37(5):900–912
Santos SR, Taylor DJ, Kinzie Iii RA, Hidaka M, Sakai K, Coffroth MA (2002) Molecular phylogeny of symbiotic dinoflagellates inferred from partial chloroplast large subunit (23S)-rDNA sequences. Mol Phylogenet Evol 23(2):97–111
Saxena A (2015) Coral reefs and their conservation—A review. Biological and Chemical Research 187–206
Silverstein RN, Cunning R, Baker AC (2015) Change in algal symbiont communities after bleaching, not prior heat exposure, increases heat tolerance of reef corals. Glob Chang Biol 21(1):236–249
Schwarz J, Brokstein PB, Voolstra C, Terry AY, Manohar CF, Miller DJ, Szmant AM, Coffroth MA, Medina M (2008) Coral life history and symbiosis: functional genomic resources for two reef building Caribbean corals, Acropora palmata and Montastraea faveolata. BMC Genomics 9:97
Suggett DJ, Warner ME, Leggat W (2017) Symbiotic dinoflagellate functional diversity mediates coral survival under ecological crisis. Trends Ecol Evol 32(10):735–745
Tan YT, Wainwright BJ, Afiq-Rosli L, Ip YC, Lee JN, Nguyen NT, Pointing SB, Huang D (2020) Endosymbiont diversity and community structure in Porites lutea from Southeast Asia are driven by a suite of environmental variables. Symbiosis 80(3):269–277
Tchernov D, Gorbunov MY, De Vargas C, Yadav SN, Milligan AJ, Häggblom M, Falkowski PG (2004) Membrane lipids of symbiotic algae are diagnostic of sensitivity to thermal bleaching in corals Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 101(37):13531–5
Thornhill DJ, LaJeunesse TC, Kemp DW, Fitt WK, Schmidt GW (2006) Multi-year, seasonal genotypic surveys of coral-algal symbioses reveal prevalent stability or post-bleaching reversion. Mar Biol 148(4):711–722
Tonk L, Sampayo EM, Weeks S, Magno-Canto M, Hoegh-Guldberg O (2014) Correction: Host-Specific Interactions with Environmental Factors Shape the Distribution of Symbiodinium across the Great Barrier Reef. PLoS ONE 9(1). 10.1371
Van Oppen MJ, Mieog JC, Sanchez CA, Fabricius KE (2005) Diversity of algal endosymbionts (zooxanthellae) in octocorals: the roles of geography and host relationships. Mol Ecol 14(8):2403–2417
Vanwonterghem I, Webster NS (2020) Coral reef microorganisms in a changing climate. iScience 23:100972
Vidal-Dupiol J, Adjeroud M, Roger E, Foure L, Duval D, Mone Y, Tambutte C S, Zoccola D, Allemand D, Mitta G (2009) Coral bleaching under thermal stress: putative involvement of host/symbiont recognition mechanisms. BMC Physiol 9:14
Walther GR, Post E, Convey P, Menzel A, Parmesan C, Beebee TJ, Fromentin JM, Hoegh-Guldberg O, Bairlein F (2002) Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature 416(6879):389–395
Warner ME, Fitt WK, Schmidt GW (1996) The effects of elevated temperature on the photosynthetic efficiency of zooxanthellae in hospite from four different species of reef coral: a novel approach. Plant Cell Environ 19:291–299
Yang SY, Keshavmurthy S, Obura D, Sheppard CR, Visram S, Chen CA (2012) Diversity and distribution of Symbiodinium associated with seven common coral species in the Chagos Archipelago, Central Indian Ocean. PLoS ONE 7(5):e35836
Yellowlees D, Rees TA, Leggat W (2008) Metabolic interactions between algal symbionts and invertebrate hosts. Plant Cell Environ 31(5):679–694
Ziegler M, Eguíluz VM, Duarte CM, Voolstra CR (2018) Rare symbionts may contribute to the resilience of coral–algal assemblages. ISME J 12(1):161–172
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the Director, CSIR-National Institute of Oceanography for the encouragement and support. CR also thanks, the Ministry of Environment, forest and climate change (MoEFCC), Govt. of India, New Delhi, and Forest department, Principal Chief Conservator of Forests (PCCF) and Chief wildlife warden, Chennai-15, Tamil Nadu and Wildlife warden, Gulf of Mannar Marine National park, Tamil Nadu, India, for the entry and as well as for collecting the coral samples. This study was supported by the Department of Biotechnology (DBT), (Grant No. BT/PR15162/ AAQ/3/752/2015) India to Dr. CR. This is NIO contribution no. 6923.
Funding
This study was supported by the Department of Biotechnology (DBT), (Grant No. BT/PR15162/ AAQ/3/752/2015) India to Dr. CR.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
CR wrote the manuscript with input from LI and AJV. CR, LI, and AJV performed the literature search and data analysis. CR supervised this review. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest or competing interests.
Ethics approval
No animal testing was performed during this study.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ravindran, C., Lawrance, I. & Vasanth, A.J. Endosymbiotic Symbiodinium clades occurrence and influence on coral growth and resilience during stress. Symbiosis 86, 261–272 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13199-022-00846-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13199-022-00846-z