Abstract
A polysafranin/multiwall carbon nanotube-Nafion hybrid film was prepared by electropolymerizing safranin on the surface of a MWCNT-Naf/CPE. The modified electrode was evaluated as an electrochemical sensor for hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and Cu2+ in the presence of H2O2, in 0.1 M Tris buffer (pH 6.0) using cyclic and differential pulse voltammetric methods. The electrode showed a pair of well-defined and quasi-reversible redox peaks with formal potential (E°΄) = 0.290 ± 0.005 V versus Ag/AgCl corresponding to the polysafranin redox couples. The effects of the experimental variables on the electrode behavior regarding polymerization conditions, electrolyte pH, and MWCNT concentration were investigated to obtain optimum experimental conditions. The investigation of differential pulse voltammetric results showed that the polysafranin film at the modified electrode surface acts as an effective catalyst for H2O2 r and Cu2+ reduction in the presence of H2O2. Under optimum conditions, the modified electrode exhibited a linear dynamic range of 4.5–23.0 mM and a sensitivity of 17.4 ± 0.4 μA mM-1 cm‑2 toward H2O2 with a detection limit of 0.6 mM (3Sbl/m). In the presence of 17.0 mM H2O2, the electrode showed a linear response range of 1.0–80.0 μM and a sensitivity of 7.6 ± 0.2 μA μM‑1 cm‑2, with a detection limit of 0.1 μM (3Sbl/m) for Cu2+. In the next step, using differential pulse voltammetry, the response of the electrode to Cu2+ was studied in the presence of interfering metal ions that can promote Fenton’s reaction. The results showed that Fe2+, Co2+, and Al3+ produce interference at more than 5-, 2- and 10-fold ratios ([cation]/[Cu2+]) respectively.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
In recent years, fabrication and application of electrochemical sensors based on modification of electrode surfaces have increased extensively. The modification of the electrode surface with different materials such as electroactive polymers and nanomaterials leads to an increase in the effective surface area, and enhancing the electrocatalytic activity and sensitivity of the corresponding sensors [1,2,3,4]. Among the several types of electrode modifiers, polyazine dyes have received considerable attention because of their effective role in electron transfer between the electrode surface and analytes. Safranin is an azonium dye which is known as basic red 2, Safranin O, and 3,7-diamino-5-phenylphenazinium chloride. It is an electroactive polyaromatic cation and its electrochemical oxidation can lead to the formation of an electrically conducting polymer film at the electrode surface. This film has good adhesion and can be used as a redox mediator for the detection and quantification of analytes such as hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and transition metals [5, 6]. Furthermore, there is considerable attention to improving electrochemical performance of electrodes by using carbon-based nanomaterials [7,8,9,10,11]. Therefore, the simultaneous use of nanomaterials and conducting polymers synergizes the advantageous features of nanomaterials and conducting polymers which can be applied for modification of electrodes [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20].
The literature survey shows that, although there are various methods such as volumetric methods [21] and spectrophotometry [22,23,24,25] for the determination of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and transition metals, voltammetric techniques are good candidates for the development of fast, easy, sensitive, and low-cost methods to investigate hydrogen peroxide and trace amounts of important elements such as copper in aqueous solutions [26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33]. In recent years, increasing attention has been paid to the use of modified electrodes for the detection of the above-mentioned compounds because they have excellent electrical and mechanical properties. Also, they show a high sensitivity, have a low detection limit, and need short analytical time [7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20, 34,35,36,37].
In this study, we developed a novel sensor for identification and determination of hydrogen peroxide and copper (II) cation in the presence of hydrogen peroxide by electropolymerization of safranin on the surface of a carbon paste electrode modified with multiwall carbon nanotube-Nafion film (PSF/MWCNT-Naf/CPE) as the working electrode. We tried to evaluate the electrocatalytic response of the electrode toward copper (II) cation based on Fenton-type reactions. Although there are some studies on the electropolymerization of azonium dyes on different electrode surfaces and their use as electrochemical sensors [38,39,40], to the best of our knowledge, none of the studies has used PSF/MWCNT-Naf/CPE as a modified electrode for sensing hydrogen peroxide and especially trace amounts of copper (II) cation.
Experimental
Materials
All chemicals were of analytical grade and used as received. Hydrogen peroxide (30%) was purchased from Merck. Nafion (5% in ethanol) and safranin were obtained from Aldrich. All experiments were performed at 25.0 °C. Tris buffer (0.1 M, pH 6.0) was used for the preparation of all sample solutions.
Apparatus
A Zahner Zennium potentiostat/galvanostat was used for electrochemical measurements. A three-electrode cell system was used with a PSF/MWCNT-Naf/CPE as the working electrode, an Ag/AgCl electrode as a reference, and a platinum rod as a counter electrode.
Fabrication of the Working Electrode
A homogeneous carbon paste was made by hand mixing of paraffin oil and graphite powder (25:75, w/w %) and was packed into a Teflon tube (ca. 3.0 mm diameter) and smoothed on a weighing paper. Then, 10 μL of Nafion solution (1% in ethanol) containing 1.25 mg/mL multiwall carbon nanotubes which were prepared by sonication for 2 h was cast on the electrode surface and dried in an oven at 80.0 °C for 3 min. The electrode was immersed in an electrochemical cell containing safranin (5.0 mM) and Tris buffer (0.1 M, pH 6.0). The electropolymerization was performed by cyclic voltammetry in the potential range between ‑ 0.8 and + 1.2 V, for 30 cycles at a scan rate of 50.0 m Vs−1. The electrode was washed with water and dried for further use. The electrolyte solution was purged with the nitrogen gas during the electrochemical measurements, to remove dissolved oxygen.
Results and Discussion
Surface Morphology of the Modified Electrode
Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) was used to examine the surface morphology of the modified electrode in the different steps of the modification (Fig. 1). Figure 1 a and b show the electrode surface modified with a multiwall carbon nanotube film (MWCNT/CPE) and the surface modified with a multiwall carbon nanotube-Nafion film (MWCNT-Naf/CPE) respectively. As seen, the MWCNT were successfully coated by a thin layer of Nafion. However, after electropolymerization (Fig. 1c), the electrode surface showed a cloudy smooth surface. Therefore, the FESEM images showed a significant difference in the surface morphology, which confirmed the formation of a PSF film on the electrode surface.
Electropolymerization of Safranin
Figure 2a shows the cyclic voltammograms of electropolymerization of safranin on the MWCNT-Naf/CPE in a solution containing 5.0 mM of safranin at a scan rate of 50.0 m Vs−1 in the potential range between ‑ 0.8 and + 1.2 V. As seen in the inset of Fig. 2a, with increasing the number of cyclic scans up to 30 cycles, the redox peak currents gradually increase. This means that the electropolymer film is formed and accumulated on the electrode surface. Further increases in cycles showed a decrease in the redox peak currents, perhaps due to the increase in the film thickness. During the electropolymerization process and, therefore, in the presence of safranin (5.0 mM), the voltammograms showed a multiple peak profile. In this profile, the redox couple with a more negative formal potential corresponds to the reaction of the safranin monomers contained in the polymer structure. The redox couple at the more positive potentials was attributed to the redox reaction of the nitrogen atom of the -NH2 group of the safranin polymer deposited on the electrode surface. At high anodic potentials, around 1.0 V, an irreversible anodic peak is seen corresponding to the electrochemical formation of the cation radical which is followed by a chemical reaction resulting in polymerization. It is noteworthy that the cyclic voltammograms of safranin molecules at first cycle, before the initiation of polymerization process (dash line), and after the 30th cycle (solid line) are the same, which emphasizes the overlap of the monomer and polymer redox peaks [38, 39]. The safranin molecule is a phenazine compound which exhibits a remarkable delocalization of positive charge over the three nitrogen atoms including both amine groups and the nitrogen ring [40,41,42,43]. This charge distribution brings three resonance forms for safranin (cationic) dye (Fig. 2b). It is obvious that the iminium ion resonance forms can participate in redox reactions. A possible mechanism for the redox reaction of safranin monomers is shown in Fig. 2b. As seen, the electrochemical reaction is associated with a two-electron and two-proton transfer processes.
The electrochemical reaction that leads to the safranin electropolymerization can be expressed in terms of the formation of the dication radical of the safranin during the oxidation reaction. The safranin monomer as an aromatic amine has electron donor properties and a high tendency to be oxidized. Monomer oxidation takes place under the applied potential. During this process, the radical cation site is generated in the monomer molecule, thus initiating the polymerization reaction. The structural properties of the polymer, such as the length distribution and the growing branches, are related to the number of radicals. This oxidative polymerization may be considered as the formation of a covalent bond between monomer molecules with the loss of two protons (Fig. 3). Therefore, safranin electropolymerization is dependent on the pH of the safranin solution [40,41,42,43,44,45,46]. Figure 2c shows the cyclic voltammograms of the electropolymerized safranin film on the modified electrode surface, providing different safranin solution pH levels (4.0–9.0). As seen in the inset of Fig. 2c, the highest cathodic and anodic peak currents were obtained at pH 6.0. Therefore, the optimum pH value was selected as 6.0 for later studies.
Cyclic Voltammetry of PSF/MWCNT-Naf/CPE
The cyclic voltammogram of the modified electrode (PSF/MWCNT-Naf/CPE) was recorded in 0.1 M potassium chloride and 0.1 M Tris buffer at pH 6.0 with a scan rate of 100.0 m Vs−1 in the potential range of − 0.8 to 1.2 V (Fig. 4a). As seen in the figure, PSF/MWCNT-Naf/CPE shows a pair of well-defined, quasi-reversible redox peaks with a peak to peak separation (∆Ep = Epa- Epc) of 431.0 mV and the value of Ipa/Ipc equal to 0.6 which is attributed to the reduction and oxidation of the polysafranin on the electrode surface (PFSox/PFSred redox couples). The formal potential (E°΄) of the polysafranin on the electrode surface was calculated from the equation E°΄ = (Epa + Epc)/2 and the result was 290.0 ± 3.0 mV versus Ag/AgCl. No peak was observed for the CPE, MWCNT/CPE, and MWCNT-Naf/CPE in the same potential range.
To obtain the best electrochemical performance of PSF/MWCNT-Naf/CPE, the parameters including pH, scan rate, and MWCNT amount were optimized. The highest peak currents were obtained when the CPE was modified with 1.25 mg/mL MWCNT. The electrochemical response of the PSF/MWCNT-Naf/CPE is, generally, pH-dependent. Thus, the electrochemical performance of the modified electrode was investigated in different pHs of the buffer solution by the cyclic voltammetry method. As seen in Fig. 4 B1 and B3, the formal potential of the PFS shifts negatively with the increase of pH in the range of 3.0 to 8.0. The plot of formal potential versus pH shows a straight line with a slope of − 60.0 mV/pH, which indicates that the electrode reaction was accompanied by the two-electron/two-proton process [43, 45,46,47]. The best response current was achieved at a pH of about 6.0 (Fig. 4 B2). Therefore, to obtain maximum sensitivity, pH 6.0 was chosen in the subsequent experiments. The observed redox behavior can be assigned to the electropolymerized safranin molecules at the MWCNT-Naf surface. Nafion is a polymer consisting of a hydrophilic ionic component and a hydrophobic perfluorocarbon backbone, so the side chain fluorocarbon of the Nafion polymer reacts with the MWCNT surfaces and the negatively charged sulfonated groups impose to the aqueous solution. Hence, Nafion can stimulate the mobility of the cationic safranin molecules toward the modified electrode and can stabilize the resultant cationic polymer on the electrode surface (Fig. 4 C1). In these circumstances, a two-electron and two-proton process can occur on the modified electrode surface and the oxidation of the cationic polymer can lead to the formation of a dihydrophenazine-like structure (Fig. 4 C2) [40, 41, 45].
Electrocatalytic Reduction of H2O2
Figure 5 a and b exhibit the cyclic voltammograms (CVs) and differential pulse voltammograms (DPVs) of PSF/MWCNT-Naf/CPE in Tris buffer at pH 6.0 in the presence of various concentrations of H2O2, respectively. As seen in Fig. 5a, there is an increase in the reduction peak current with increasing the H2O2 concentration. The increase in the reduction peak current is accompanied by the decrease of the corresponding oxidation peak current, which is characteristic of an electrochemically catalytic reaction. Therefore, the PSF on the electrode surface can act as a potent catalyst for the reduction of H2O2 (5D). DVPs show along with increasing the concentration of H2O2 the reduction peak current of PSF (Ipc) at − 370.0 mV decreases, and two new reduction peaks at potentials 90.0 mV (Ipc1) and − 650.0 mV (Ipc2) begin to appear and increase gradually. It seems in the presence of H2O2 the product of PSF oxidation (Fig. 4 C2), being oxidized further [40], and the resulting products can be reduced at the electrode surface at the above- mentioned potentials.
The effect of varying amounts of H2O2 on Ipc1 is remarkably more than that of Ipc2 (Fig. 5b). The Ipc1 is linearly proportional to the concentration of H2O2 in the range of 4.5 to 23.0 mM with the regression equation Ipc1/μA = 1.2(± 0.3 × 10–1) × C + 15.3(± 0.4) (C in mM, R2 = 0.99) (Fig. 5c). The modified electrode shows a sensitivity of 17.5 ± 0.4 μA mM‑1 cm‑2 for H2O2. The limit of detection, Cm, was estimated by using the equation Cm = 3Sbl/m, where Sbl = 2.7 × 10–1 μA is the standard deviation of the cathodic peak current in the absence of H2O2 (10 replicates) and m is the slope of the calibration curve. Analyzing these data, we estimate that the detection limit of H2O2 is 0.6 mM. A comparison of the electroanalytical performance of PSF/MWCNT-Naf/CPE with some other previously reported modified electrodes indicated that the modified electrode has acceptable electrocatalytic activity and rapid response time toward hydrogen peroxide oxidation and reduction [48,49,50]. It is noteworthy that H2O2 showed no voltammetric peaks in the abovementioned potential window at the surface of the bare CPE (Fig. 5a). From the analytical point of view, there are many reports that present a better result than our result [3, 4, 7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16]. However, the stability and the fast response of the electrode make it suitable for investigating the mechanistic aspect of this work and also the determination of Cu2+ in the presence of hydrogen peroxide (next section).
Electrocatalytic Reduction of Cu2+
Figure 6a exhibits the cyclic voltammograms of the modified electrode in 0.1 M Tris buffer at pH 6.0 in the presence of (a) Cu2+ (0.0 μM)/H2O2 (0.0 mM), (b) Cu2+ (0.0 μM)/H2O2 (17.0 mM), (c) Cu2+ (20.8 μM)/H2O2 (17.0 mM), and (d) Cu2+ (48.7 μM)/H2O2 (17.0 mM). As the figure shows, adding Cu2+ to the buffer solution containing H2O2 (17.0 mM) leads to a more significant increase in the reduction peak current. The increase in the reduction peak current is accompanied by a decrease in the corresponding oxidation peak current. This result shows that in the presence of Cu2+, the PSF film on the electrode surface can act as a potent catalyst for the reduction of OH0 which is produced during the Fenton-like (cupro-Fenton) reaction. According to the literature, Cu2+ can convert to Cu+ and produce large amounts of OH° in the presence of excess H2O2 (Eqs. 1–4) [51, 52] (Fig. 6d). Regardless of the mechanism by which H2O2 may react with Cu2+ to form Cu+, it is possible that the obtained O2°− reacts with Cu2+ to produce Cu+ (Cu2+ + O2°− → Cu+ + O2), which means that even more Cu (I) can be formed.
In these circumstances, PSFox can accept two electrons from the electrode and two protons from the solution to change into PSFred. In the second step, PSFred is changed into PSFox by hydroxyl radicals produced from cupro-Fenton’s reaction. Therefore, the increasing Cu2+ ion concentration causes an increase in the amount of PSFox species and, finally, enhances the reduction peak current. It is noteworthy that the hydrogen peroxide concentrations above 17.00 mM did not affect the electrode response toward Cu2+. Figure 6b shows the differential pulse voltammetric investigation of Cu2+ on the surface of the modified electrode in the presence of H2O2 with more details. Here too, the product of the reaction of PSF with H2O2 shows two reduction peaks (Fig. 4 C2), and the currents of both reduction peaks, Ipc1 and Ipc2, are increased by increasing the Cu2+ concentration. Ipc1 is more strongly affected by varying Cu2+ concentrations than Ipc2 and the intensity of Ipc1 is linearly proportional to the Cu2+ concentration in the range of 1.0 to 80.0 μM with the regression equation Ipc1/μA = 0.5 (± 0.1 × 10–1) × C + 118.0 (± 0.4) (C in mM, R2 = 0.99) (Fig. 6c). The modified electrode exhibits a sensitivity of 7.6 ± 0.2 μA μM‑1 cm‑2 for Cu2+. The limit of detection, Cm, was estimated by using the equation Cm = 3Sbl/m, where Sbl = 0.1 × 10–1 μA is the standard deviation of the cathodic peak current in the absence of Cu2+ (10 replicates) and m is the slope of the calibration curve. With the analysis of these data, we estimated that the detection limit of Cu2+ was 0.1 μM. It is noteworthy that Cu2+ showed no voltammetric peaks for the Cu2+ ions in the above mentioned potential window at the surface of the bare CPE. Table 1 exhibits the comparison of detection limit and dynamic linear range values of the modified electrode for Cu2+ and some literature values [52,53,54,55,56]. As seen in the figure, the method has a lower limit of linear response toward Cu2+ than some other reports in the literature. To evaluate the application of the modified electrode, some Cu2+ samples were determined by the standard addition method. The Cu2+ concentrations were confirmed by atomic absorption spectroscopy. The results presented in Table 2 seem to be satisfactory.
Interferences Study
The response of the electrode to Cu2+ (36 μM) in the presence of metal ions that can promote Fenton reaction (such as Fe2+, Co2+, and Al3+) was examined by the differential pulse voltammetry technique. The maximum amount of the cations that can cause an error of up to 5% on the peak current of Cu2+ (Ipc1) was considered the maximum tolerance level. As seen in Table 3, Fe2+, Co2+, and Al3+ have interferences at the ratios ([cation]/[Cu2+]) more than 5-, 2-, and 10-fold respectively.
Stability, Reproducibility, and Repeatability
The stability of the modified electrode was investigated by cyclic voltammetry in the potential range of − 0.8 to 1.2 V. Results showed that after 20 cycles, the cathodic and anodic peak potentials remained nearly unchanged while the anodic and cathodic peak currents reduced by 1.7% and 0.7% respectively. Furthermore, results showed the cathodic peak current decreased to about 93% of its first value after 2 days.
The reproducibility of the electrode was estimated by preparing five electrodes under the same conditions. The relative standard deviation (% R.S.D.) was 5.3% for an average of 322.6 μA for the cathodic peak current.
The repeatability of the modified electrode was examined by measuring the cathodic current toward 17.0 mM H2O2 and 48.7 μM Cu2+ in the presence of 17.0 mM of hydrogen peroxide. The relative standard deviations for three successive measurements were 4.8% and 3.2% respectively.
Conclusions
In this work, the electropolymerization technique was applied to construct a hybrid conductive film of PSF/MWCNT-Naf at CPE. The FESEM images revealed the formation of PSF. Results demonstrated that the PSF/MWCNT-Naf/CPE can act as an electrochemical sensor for the detection of H2O2 and trace amounts of copper (II) cation in the presence of H2O2. The proposed electrochemical sensor exhibited fast response, low cost, high sensitivity, stability, and simplicity in fabrication and manipulation. So, the development of this new method for the analysis of H2O2 and trace amounts of copper (II) cation is beneficial, especially with regard to some properties of the method such as cost effectiveness, fast response, and safety.
References
V.S. Manikandan, B. Sidhureddy, A. Thiruppathi, A. Chen, Sensitive electrochemical detection of caffeic acid in wine based on fluorine-doped graphene oxide. Sensors 19(7), 1604 (2019)
R. Zhang, W. Chen Biosens, Recent advances in graphene-based nanomaterials for fabricating electrochemical hydrogen peroxide sensors. Bioelectron. 89(Pt 1), 249–268 (2017)
A. Manivel, S. Anandan, J. Solid State Electrochem. 15, 153 (2010)
H.W. Siao, S.M. Chen, K.C. Lin, J. Solid State Electrochem. 15, 1121 (2010)
R. Herrero, R. Guidelli, Adsorption and reduction kinetics of safranine T in self-assembled phospholipid monolayers deposited on mercury. J. Electroanal. Chem. 425(1-2), 87–95 (1997)
R. Pauliukaite, M.E. Ghica, M.M. Barsan, C.M.A. Brett, Phenazines and polyphenazines in electrochemical sensors and biosensors. Anal. Lett. 43(10-11), 1588–1608 (2010)
Y. Li, Y. Li, Y. Yang, A new amperometric H2O2 biosensor based on nanocomposite films of chitosan–MWNTs, hemoglobin, and silver nanoparticles. J. Solid State Electrochem. 16(3), 1133–1140 (2012)
A. Afraz, A.A. Rafati, A. Hajian, Analytical sensing of hydrogen peroxide on Ag nanoparticles–multiwalled carbon nanotube-modified glassy carbon electrode. J. Solid State Electrochem. 17(7), 2017–2025 (2013)
J.V. Da Silva, D.M. Pimentel, D.E.P. Souto, R. de Cassia Silva Luz, F.S. Damos, J. Solid State Electrochem. 17, 2795 (2013)
S. Nalini, S. Nandini, S. Shanmugam, S.E. Neelagund, J.S. Melo, G.S. Suresh, J. Solid State Electrochem. 18, 685 (2013)
M.S. Randjelović, M.Z. Momčilović, D. Enke, V. Mirčeski, Electrochemistry of hydrogen peroxide reduction reaction on carbon paste electrodes modified by Ag- and Pt-supported carbon microspheres. J. Solid State Electrochem. 23(4), 1257–1267 (2019)
X. Liu, L. Luo, Y. Ding, Y. Xu, F. Li, J. Solid State Electrochem. 15, 447 (2010)
J. Wang, L. Cui, H. Yin, J. Dong, S. Ai, J. Solid State Electrochem. 16, 1545 (2011)
L. Wang, H. Zhu, H. Hou, Z. Zhang, X. Xio, Y. Song, J. Solid State Electrochem. 16, 1693 (2011)
R. Wu, X. Chen, J. Hu, J. Solid State Electrochem. 16, 1975 (2011)
Y. Wang, H. Zhang, D. Yao, J. Pu, Y. Zhang, X. Gao, Y. Sun, J. Solid State Electrochem. 17, 881 (2012)
P. Prabhu, R.S. Babu, S.S. Narayanan, J. Solid State Electrochem. 18, 883 (2013)
W.L. Hao, H.X. Li, C.Y. Shen, S.L. Liu, J. Solid State Electrochem. 18, 1041 (2013)
B.P. Crulhas, N.P. Ramos, G.R. Castro, V.A. Pedrosa, Detection of hydrogen peroxide releasing from prostate cancer cell using a biosensor. J. Solid State Electrochem. 20(9), 2427–2433 (2016)
K.G. Nikolaev, V. Maybeck, E. Neumann, Y.E. Ermolenko, A. Offenhausser, Y.G. Mourzina, J. Solid State Electrochem. 22, 1023 (2017)
M.I. Prodromidis, C.D. Stalikas, P.T. Veltsistas, M.I. Karayannis, Spectrophotometric kinetic determination of copper(II) trace amounts based on its catalytic effect on the reaction of the reduced 2,6-dichlorophenolindophenol and hydrogen peroxide. Talanta 41(10), 1645–1649 (1994)
Y.Y. Petrova, M.K. Beklemishev, N.A. Bazhanova, A.A. Druzhinin, I.F. Dolmanova, Determination of copper by its catalytic effect on the oxidation of hydroquinone by hydrogen peroxide on supports. J. Anal. Chem. 55(3), 284–290 (2000)
A. Yeşilkaya, A. Yeĝin, G. Yücel, Y. Alicigüzel, T.A. Aksu, Continuous monitoring of hydroperoxide-induced peroxidation in human erythrocytes by low-level chemiluminescence. Int. J. Clin. Lab Res. 26(1), 60–68 (1996)
A.N. Baga, G.R.A. Johnson, N.B.R.A. Nazhat, Saadalla-Nazhat, Anal. Chim. Acta 204, 349–353 (1988)
K. Helrach, Official Methods of Analysis, 15th edn. (Arlington, AOAC, 1990), Sec. 965.33
D. Jin, K. Sakthivel, S. Gandhi, B.T. Huy, Y.I. Lee, An improved non-enzymatic hydrogen peroxide sensor based on europium functionalized inorganic hybrid material—evaluation of optical and electrochemical properties. Sensor Actuat. B-Chem. 237, 81–89 (2016)
Y. Jiang, J.V. Hunt, S.P. Wolff, Ferrous ion oxidation in the presence of xylenol orange for detection of lipid hydroperoxide in low density lipoprotein. Anal. Biochem. 202(2), 384–389 (1992)
K. Ma, F.R. van de Voort, A.A. Ismail, H. Zhuo, B. Cheng, Monitoring peroxide value in fatliquor manufacture by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 77(6), 681–685 (2000)
H. Ruttinger, A. Radschuweit, Determination of peroxides by capillary zone electrophoresis with amperometric detection. J. Chromatogr. A 868(1), 127–134 (2000)
C.W. Zhang, Oloman, J. Appl. Electrochem. 35(10), 945–953 (2005)
P. Westbroek, J. Hakuzimana, E. Gasana, P. Lombaert, P. Kiekens, Voltammetric detection of hydrogen peroxide in teeth whitening gels. Sensors Actuators B Chem. 124(2), 317–322 (2007)
I. Švancara, K. Vytřas, J. Barek, J. Zima, Carbon Paste Electrodes in Modern Electroanalysis. Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 31(4), 311–345 (2001)
B. Uslu, S.A. Ozkan, Electroanalytical application of carbon based electrodes to the pharmaceuticals. Anal. Lett. 40(5), 817–853 (2007)
L. Zou, Y. Li, W. Zhao, S. Zhang, B. Ye, J. Solid State Electrochem. 16, 505 (2011)
Y.Q. Tian, H.Q. Luo, N.B. Li, J. Solid State Electrochem. 16, 529 (2011)
R. Ansari, A.F. Delavar, A. Aliakbar, A. Mohammad-Khan, J. Solid State Electrochem. 16, 869 (2011)
H. Shen, J.E. Mark, C.J. Seliskar, H.B. Mark Jr., W.R. Heineman, Stripping voltammetry of copper and lead using gold electrodes modified with self-assembled monolayers. J. Solid State Electrochem. 1(3), 241–247 (1997)
R. Pauliukaite, M.E. Ghica, M. Barsan, C.M.A. Brett, Characterisation of poly(neutral red) modified carbon film electrodes; application as a redox mediator for biosensors. J. Solid State Electrochem. 11(7), 899–908 (2007)
G. Inzelt, E. Csahók, Electrochemical Quartz Crystal Microbalance Studies of the Formation and Redox Behavior of Poly(Neutral Red) Electrodes. Electroanalysis 11(10-11), 744–748 (1999)
G. Cirić-Marjanović, N.V. Blinova, M. Trchová, J. Stejskal, J. Phys. Chem. B 111, 2188 (2007)
R. Pauliukaite, A. Selskiene, A. Malinauskas, C.M.A. Brett, Electrosynthesis and characterisation of poly(safranine T) electroactive polymer films. Thin Solid Films 517(18), 5435–5441 (2009)
A. Taher, F. Majidi, A. Mohadesi, Electrochemical and electrocatalytic behaviors of Safranin O/Nafion film deposited on the glassy carbon electrode. Russ. J. Electrochem. 45(10), 1156–1161 (2009)
M.M. Barsan, M.E. Ghica, C.M.A. Brett, Electrochemical sensors and biosensors based on redox polymer/carbon nanotube modified electrodes: A review. Anal. Chim. Acta 881, 1–23 (2015)
A.A. Karyakin, E.E. Karyakina, H.L. Schmidt, Electropolymerized azines: a new group of electroactive polymers. Electroanalysis 11(3), 149–155 (1999)
A.A. Karyakin, E.E. Karyakina, W. Schumann, H.L. Schmidt, Electropolymerized azines: Part II. In a search of the best electrocatalyst of NADH oxidation. Electroanalysis 11(8), 553–557 (1999)
W.J. Albery, A.R. Mount, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 185, 1189 (1989)
S. Shahrokhian, M. Ghalkhani, Simultaneous voltammetric detection of ascorbic acid and uric acid at a carbon-paste modified electrode incorporating thionine–nafion ion-pair as an electron mediator. Electrochim. Acta 51(13), 2599–2606 (2006)
J.S. Easow, T. Selvaraju, Unzipped catalytic activity of copper in realizing bimetallic Ag@Cu nanowires as a better amperometric H2O2 sensor. Electrochim. Acta 112, 648–654 (2013)
J. Zhou, Y. Zhao, J. Bao, D. Huo, H. Fa, X. Shen, C. Hou, One-step electrodeposition of Au-Pt bimetallic nanoparticles on MoS 2 nanoflowers for hydrogen peroxide enzyme-free electrochemical sensor. Electrochim. Acta 250, 152–158 (2017)
K. Kim, K. Lee, S. So, S. Cho, M. Lee, K. You, J. Moon, T. Song, ECS J Solid State Sci. Technol. 7, 91 (2018)
A.N. Pham, G. Xing, C.J. Miller, T.D. Waite, Fenton-like copper redox chemistry revisited: hydrogen peroxide and superoxide mediation of copper-catalyzed oxidant production. J. Catal. 301, 54–64 (2013)
B. Feier, I. Băjan, I. Fizeșan, D. Floner, C. Cristea, F. Geneste, R. Săndulescu, Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 10, 121 (2015)
X. Dai, R.G. Compton, Determination of copper in the presence of various amounts of arsenic with L-cysteine modified gold electrodes. Electroanalysis 17(20), 1835–1840 (2005)
I. Cesarino, G. Marino, J. do Rosario Matos, E.T.G. Cavalheiro, Talanta 75, 15 (2008)
M. Nasiri-Majd, M.A. Taher, H. Fazelirad, Preparation and application of a simple electrochemical sensor for the determination of copper in some real and standard samples. Ionics 22(2), 289–296 (2016)
H.B. Noh, K.S. Lee, P. Chandra, M.S. Won, Y.B. Shim, Electrochim. Acta 61 (2012)
Acknowledgments
We gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the Research Council of Persian Gulf University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sayahpour, M., Hashemnia, S. & Mokhtari, Z. Preparation and Assessment of a Polysafranin/Multiwall Carbon Nanotube-Nafion Hybrid Film–Modified Carbon Paste Electrode and Its Performance as an Easy Sensing Probe for H2O2 and Cu2+. Electrocatalysis 12, 91–100 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12678-020-00629-4
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12678-020-00629-4