Abstract
Weissella strains have been the subject of much research over the last 5 years because of the genus’ technological and probiotic potential. Certain strains have attracted the attention of the pharmaceutical, medical, and food industries because of their ability to produce antimicrobial exopolysaccharides (EPSs). Moreover, Weissella strains are able to keep foodborne pathogens in check because of the bacteriocins, hydrogen peroxide, and organic acids they can produce; all listed have recognized pathogen inhibitory activities. The Weissella genus has also shown potential for treating atopic dermatitis and certain cancers. W. cibaria, W. confusa, and W. paramesenteroides are particularly of note because of their probiotic potential (fermentation of prebiotic fibers) and their ability to survive in the gastrointestinal tract. It is important to note that most of the Weissella strains with these health-promoting properties have been shown to be save safe, due to the absence or the low occurrence of virulence or antibiotic-resistant genes. A large number of scientific studies continue to report on and to support the use of Weissella strains in the food and pharmaceutical industries. This review provides an overview of these studies and draws conclusions for future uses of this rich and previously unexplored genus.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Advances in molecular biology can be credited with the discovery of the Weissella genus. Collins et al. [1] reported that strains with very similar phenotypic characteristics that had previously been included in the Leuconostoc genus exhibited different DNA profiles from other bacteria in the group. The authors used 16S rRNA sequences to study Weissella. They found that certain strains demonstrated specific features that were phylogenetically closer to Leuconostoc paramesenteroides than others. Collins et al. [1] recommended that L. paramesenteroides, a new species isolated from fermented sausages, and certain heterofermentative lactobacilli be classified as a new genus, Weissella.
The Weissella genus belongs to the Firmicutes phylum, Bacilli class, the Lactobacillales order, and the Leuconostocaceae family. Weissella bacteria are closely related to other lactic acid bacteria (LAB) genera. Fusco et al. [2] reported significant difficulty in separating the Weissella genus from other LAB, particularly from Leuconostoc species. Weissella species morphology may differ within the genus. The short rods with rounded to tapered ends or coccoid shapes that typify Weissella species are similar to Leuconostoc, Oenococcus, and streptococci [1]. Nevertheless, some Weissella species can present pleomorphisms under stress conditions. Cells can be present alone, in pairs, or even in small chains [1, 3]. Currently, 25 Weissella species have been determined: W. viridescens, [4], W. paramesenteroides [5], W. confusa [1], W. kandleri [6], W. halotolerans [7], W. minor [7], W. hellenica [1], W. thailandensis [8], W. soli [9], W. cibaria [10], W. koreensis[11], W. ghanensis [12], W. beninenses [13], W. fabaria [14], W. ceti [15], W. fabalis [16], W. oryzae[17], W. diestrammenae [18], W. uvarum [19], W. cryptocerci [20], W. bombi [21], W. jogaejeotgali [22], W. kimchi [23], W. muntiaci [24], and W. sagaensis [25]. A clear, well-documented summary of Weissella taxonomy and ecology can be found in Fusco et al. [2]. Although Weissella remains a relatively new genus compared with other LAB, it has been the focus of research in the past 5 years and has attracted a strong interest from the food industry. Specific Weissella strains have been studied for their ability to produce (i) antimicrobial compounds like bacteriocins and hydrogen peroxide and (ii) exopolysaccharides (EPSs) and diacetyl. The latter are of major importance to dairy applications [26,27,28,29]. Different strains have been isolated from artisanally produced foods, which demonstrate the contributing role Weissella plays in the foods’ characteristic features. Other studies have highlighted Weissella strains’ ability to survive in the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) and even grow in the gut. Both of these attributes suggest the use of Weissella species as beneficial applied probiotics [30,31,32].
The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the Weissella genus and present the latest research and findings from the past 5 years. The paper presents the most recent techniques and approaches used in Weissella identification and characterization. It also covers the bacteria genus’ potential health benefits and its main technological features which are of interest to the food industry.
Weissella Species Identification and Characterization
The past 5 years have seen the development of new methods for identifying Weissella species. They now make it possible to distinguish Weissella species from other closely related LAB. The polyphasic identification method and sequencing and analysis of the 16S and 23S rRNA genes are two new molecular-based identification methods that allow for rapid differentiation between Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, Pediococcus pentosaceus, and Weissella confusa [33]. Complete genome sequence analysis using bioinformatic analysis can be used to describe metabolic routes and to predict potential uses for the identified strains [34,35,36,37,38]. These methods are the foundation of modern microbial taxonomy, as are matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight method (MALDI-TOF) and database mass spectrometry [39, 40]. One recent study has shown that the colony morphology of W. confusa can change according to the adopted culture media and incubation conditions. W. confusa’s morphology can vary from rod-shaped coccobacilli—with characteristic, small, cream-colored colonies gathered in single, short or long chains—to a large, irregularly shaped, transparent morphology that lacks characteristic chain cell organization [41]. Weissella strains can also thrive in high-sugar niches and produce large amounts of dextran [41]. Weissella strains’ behavior in different substrates is key to differentiating them from other LAB.
Genomic and metatranscriptomic methods have been used to assess the metabolic and fermentative traits of W. koreensis during the kimchi fermentation process. This has led to the characterization of metabolic pathways for certain carbohydrates fermented by W. koreensis. These include D-glucose, D-mannose, D-lactose, L-malate, D-xylose, L-arabinose, D-ribose, N-acetyl-glucosamine, and gluconate [42]. The determination of carbohydrate metabolic pathways makes it possible to predict how specific Weissella substrates will ferment, as well as pinpoint those which promote higher cell multiplication rates. It also allows for an estimation in type and quantity of products generated by the fermentation process. With this information, it is possible to predict the ecosystems where Weissella will survive and thus potential food and pharmaceutical applications for specific species.
Rizzello et al. [43] delved into Weissella genus metabolism by focusing on W. cibaria and W. confusa strains. The resulting data showed that W. cibaria and W. confusa. were able to both produce phytase and use phytic acid, thus counteracting an anti-nutritional factor in legumes. The two strains were also able to reduce the raffinose oligosaccharide (RFO) concentrations of α-galactosides raffinose, verbascose, and stachyoserafinose. RFO concentrations represent another anti-nutritional factor in vegetables, especially fava beans. When W. cibaria and W. confusa strains undergo the formation process, RFO hydrolysis enables galactose production. [43]. Legumes such as fava beans, peas, and lentils are a good source of vegetable proteins. Their anti-nutritional factors include saponins, condensed tannins, and protease inhibitors. α-Galactosides and phytic acid [44] have been shown to inhibit them. Fermentation and its subsequent reduction of these anti-nutritional factors would allow these foods to be used as new protein sources for both humans and animals. These new protein sources could in turn be used to develop new products in the food industry.
Many Weissella strains have been isolated from fermented products such as kimchi, pozol, jeotgal, and ogi [33, 39, 42, 45]. These strains have been characterized in terms of the carbon source they use and the compounds they can produce. While studying carbon source metabolism, López-Hernández et al. [45] observed that strains W. cibaria, W. confusa, and W. paramesenteroides were able to metabolize D-xylose, glucose, D-fructose, D-mannose, sucrose, and D-maltose. Some strains were also able to use ribose and esculin ferric citrate. Others were able to use galactose, metabolize cellobiose, and demonstrate β-glucosidase and β-galactosidase activity. The latter is a desirable characteristic in probiotic microorganisms, as β-glucosidase breaks down certain compounds and makes them easier for the body to absorb. Anthocyanins, which have antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties, are among these compounds [46].
New identification methods have allowed for rapid and accurate identification of Weissella strains and reduced the risk of misidentification. Characterizing Weissella strains based on their metabolic pathways opens up the possibilities for their use in the medical and food production sectors.
Beneficial Properties of Weissella
Once the metabolic pathways of Weissella have been characterized, isolated strains can be studied for use in the pharmaceutical and food industries. Weissella isolates have beneficial, probiotic features and are able to produce EPS. These make them an important bacteria in both pharmaceutical and food production sectors. Abriouel et al. [47] described the technological, functional, and pathogenic potential of Weissella genus applications in the food industry, but their review only covered research carried out before 2015. Below, our review presents and discusses the primary benefits of Weissella based on these areas of study.
Health Benefits of Weissella
Few studies in the past 5 years have examined the effects of Weissella strains on human health [48,49,50]. Some research has evaluated their effects on mice [51,52,53,54,55], gerbils [56], and beagles [57]. Most studies have demonstrated how Weissella’s probiotic characteristics and antimicrobial properties may offer health benefits. Only two strains of W. cibaria have been studied for their probiotic potential for humans. W. cibaria JW15 was studied because of how it affects cytokine and immunoglobulin natural killer cell activity, and W. cibaria CMU has been the subject of research because of its oral epithelial cell adhesion and oral colonization; W. cibaria CMU’s antibacterial activity against Fusobacterium nucleatum and Streptococcus mutans [48,49,50] represents another important species feature. A recent study found that immune functions were enhanced by an increase in natural killer cell activity for subjects who consumed probiotic W. cibaria capsules [50]. Moreover, oral ingestion of W. cibaria CMU can help to reduce halitosis and microbiota numbers in the gingival sulcus, thus improving oral health [48, 49].
Fonseca et al. [56] tested strains of Bifidobacterium longum and W. paramesenteroides to assess their probiotic potential and their impact on parasite load in gerbils. They observed the positive effect these two strains had in reducing the parasitic load of animals infected with Giardia. Strains of W. cibaria have been studied as a way to reduce cancer treatment drug side effects in mice [55]. W. cibaria strains were shown to assist in the recovery of lymphocytes, hemoglobins, and platelet levels that drop when cyclosporamide (an anti-cancer agent) is administered. Cyclosporamide is widely used in the treatment of acute and chronic leukemia, lymphoma, and a number of autoimmune diseases [55]. W. cibaria strains also proved to be efficient in treating atopic dermatitis when administered orally to mice. W. cibaria improved the clinical symptoms of lesions, such as erythema/hemorrhage, edema/excoriation, erosion, scarring/dryness, and lichenification [54]. In yet another study, W. cibaria was shown to reduce the destruction of periodontal tissue in mice and also protected against alveolar bone destruction in mice. W. cibaria co-aggregates with periodontal bacteria to produce hydrogen peroxide and bacteriocins that inhibit the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines [58]. Although clinical studies using mice are an effective research technique, these studies cannot reliably predict the outcome of human studies [59]. Further study is needed to determine the health benefits of Weissella strains for humans.
Although there have been few human or animal studies using Weissella strains in vitro research indicates a potential for future use as antimicrobial agents (Table 1) and probiotics (Table 2). Further study on animals and/or humans is necessary to prove their efficiency as a functional species. The W. confusa DD_A7 strain has been shown to be a natural alternative prophylactic agent against multidrug-resistant (MDR) ESBL (extended-spectrum β-lactamase) positive E. coli bacteria [27, 29]. W. confusa has also been shown to be effective destroying Listeria monocytogenes (ATCC 7644), Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 12600), Salmonella Typhimurium (ATCC 43174), Bacillus cereus (ATCC 13061), and E. coli O157: H7 (ATCC 43889) pathogens. Several studies have shown that the supernatant from of W. confusa culture weakened the membrane of the pathogen E. coli O157: H7 (ATCC 43889) and damaged the integrity of its DNA [27, 29]. Another study which paired W. viridescens with high-pressure processing showed strong results when it came to protecting ready-to-eat salads from L. monocytogenes. The research showed that high pressure applied to the weakened pathogen membranes which then facilitated the antimicrobial activity produced by the W. viridescens strain [60].
Recent in vitro studies have shown that W. cibaria, W. koreensis, W. confusa, and W. paramesenteroides strains are strong candidates for probiotic applications [30, 32, 61,62,63,64]. The survival of these strains in the GIT and their tolerance levels when in contact with bile and acids are important factors for intestinal colonization and pathogen protection. W. paramesenteroides has also been shown to form a biofilm which facilitates mucin adherence. It uses fructooligosaccharides (FOS) and galactooligosaccharides (GOS) as prebiotic fibers to the form of compounds that can survive the gut microbiome. W. paramesenteroides has also demonstrated antimicrobial activity against E. coli and S. aureus [62]. In another study, Anandharaj et al. [30] demonstrated that Weissella species may help reduce cholesterol due to its ability to use cholesterol from de Man, Rogosa and Sharpe (MRS) agar with added Oxgall and water-soluble cholesterol. Cholesterol reduction is common in probiotic microorganisms isolated from the intestine [65,66,67]. Interestingly, Kim et al. [58] found that using the W. cibaria D30 probiotic strain in fermented Inula britannica created a product with improved anti-inflammatory capacity.
W. confusa and W. cibaria—isolated from Plaa Som Fug—have also been shown to produce folate. Folate, or Vitamin B9, plays an important role in DNA replication, repair, and methylation. It can also act as an antioxidant [68]. Folate is important for immune and nervous system functions because it plays an integral part in the synthesis of neurotransmitters in the central nervous system [69]. This is especially the case during the early stages of uterine growth and development.
Extensive research has been carried out on Weissella genus antimicrobial activity and its potential use of strains as probiotics. However, other beneficial compounds produced by Weissella, including vitamins, have only been touched on in research thus far.
EPS Production by Weissella
EPSs are extracellular macromolecules that have potential applications in the food, medical, and pharmaceutical industries. It has been shown that Weissella strains can produce these molecules, and EPS production has been the focus of several Weissella studies (Table 3). EPS production has been primarily documented for W. confusa and W. cibaria strains, with dextran as the dominant EPS produced by the strains. Structurally, dextran molecules are highly linear. They are formed by α-1,6-linked glucose residues with branches linked to α-1,2, α-1,3, or α-1,4. The α-1,2 bonds are representative of prebiotic properties because they are resistant to adverse GIT conditions and can help to modulate the intestinal microbiota [41, 70,71,72]. EPS produced by LAB are generally recognized as safe (GRAS), which means they can be used in foods, prebiotics, and medical applications.
Of the LAB Weissella species, W. cibaria and W. confusa are the most important EPS producers, which is why research has focused on them and their production, purification, and characterization [41, 71,72,73,74,75,76]. Some studies have proposed ways to optimize EPS production and to test different parameters, such as the effects of different temperatures and substrates. Hu and Gänzel [71] showed that W. cibaria strains grew faster at 30 °C, but oligosaccharide production was higher at temperatures at or below 20 °C. The greatest dextran production occurred at 15 °C.
The physicochemical properties of bacteria-produced EPS are an important factor for functionality and use. Devi et al. [73] carried out physicochemical characterizations of galactan EPS produced by a W. confusa strain. They showed that the EPS displayed a high oil absorption capacity, strong emulsifying activity, and an emulsion kinetic stability of up to 15 days. These results supported the theory that galactan EPS may be a good candidate as an emulsifier in forming long-term colloidal systems in food, pharmaceutical, and cosmetic products. Other studies have shown that several Weissella strains use a dextransucrase enzyme to produce dextran. This enzyme has been the focus of isolation and purification studies for the production of EPS [77, 78] and caffeic acids [79]. Dextransucrase produced by a W. confusa strain has been shown to synthesize a rare oligosaccharide called isomelezitose. This oligosaccharide has a potent nutraceutical effect due to its ability to promote bifidobacteria growth in the colon [78].
The EPS produced by LAB have antifungal [80], anti-inflammatory, and immunomodulatory properties [51] that may be of great interest to the medical sector. EPS can also act as antioxidants [26, 28, 51, 76] and help probiotics survive passage through the GIT [81]. The linear EPS galactan produced by the W. confusa strain shows strong potential for encapsulation technology that is used to deliver bioactive compounds, probiotics, and drugs. The EPS produced by a W. confusa strain was shown to inhibit the multiplication of Candida albicans and was able to destroy up to 70% of the biofilm formed by this pathogen [80]. This suggests that it could be a promising candidate for use in antifungal treatments. Another recent study showed that W. confusa can produce mannan, an EPS made up of only monomeric units of mannose. This EPS displayed antibiofilm activity against pathogenic bacteria such as S. aureus, L. monocytogenes, S. enterica, and S. typhi. It also demonstrated potential as an antioxidant compound [61].
EPS may also have prebiotic properties. This is the case for the EPS produced by the W. cibaria strain isolated from pomelos (Citrus maximum) grown in India [82]. To be categorized as a prebiotic compound, the EPS carbohydrates must demonstrate higher metabolization levels from probiotic bacteria than from enteric bacteria present in the intestine. Dextran produced by W. cibaria was shown to stimulate the growth of L. plantarum, L. acidophilus, B. animalis, B. bifidum, and B. infantis more than E. coli and E. aerogenes [82]. This activity confirmed its classification as a prebiotic compound.
In the food industry, EPS can be used to improve the rheological characteristics and texture of fermented products. EPS can also play a role as an emulsifier and stabilizer [28, 74, 81]. EPS-producing LABs can be used as starter or secondary cultures in the production of fermented products such as yogurt [83]. The use of these cultures leads to the production of EPS in situ, where they act as natural thickeners and can eliminate the need for artificial additives [76]. Weissella strains have been used to ferment quinoa-based yogurt [84] and fruit juices [85, 86]. The EPS produced can improve the sensory characteristics of such products. One example: Orange juice concentrate was used to produce oligosaccharides. Then, after a fermentation process involving the sucrose present in the juice itself, a drink was obtained with reduced a sugar content and specific acidity and sweetness levels [85, 86].
EPS are also of interest to the frozen dough industry, as they can modify the texture and improve the end product characteristics of frozen and thawed doughs. Studies have shown that dextrans produced by different microorganisms have different functionalities. For instance, dextran produced by the W. cibaria strain demonstrated a greater ability to reinforce gelling properties compared with dextran produced by L. pseudomesenteroides when the strains were mixed with fava bean (Vicia faba L.) protein isolate [87, 88]. Weissella EPS has also been shown to improve the characteristics of wheat gluten during dough freezing and thawing. In general, the freezing-thawing process leads to an increase in water loss, a decrease in gluten viscoelasticity, and changes in water mobility and distribution. During freezing and thawing, the continuous structure of gluten is destroyed by mechanical damage caused when ice recrystallizes. An addition of W. confuse-produced EPS to doughs helped the gluten to maintain its qualities and structural integrity during the freezing-thawing process. This makes Weissella EPS promising cryoprotectant candidates for the frozen dough industry [86].
Weissella as an Emerging Pathogen
Weissella isolates with potential health benefits must also be assessed for any adverse effects. Testing is standard procedure for isolates to be used as food supplements and starter cultures to determine if they harbor virulent or antibiotic-resistant genes, even when the negative effects are not active or apparent. [89]. If or when any noxious genetic properties are present in the isolate genome, they represent a health risk because they may be transferred to other bacteria present in the food matrix or gut [90,91,92].
Although many LAB cultures found in foods and are considered safe, the biosafety of new cultures must be established before they can be used in food production [93]. Most of the studies carried out to determine Weissella strains’ probiotic potential also evaluate the strains’ health risks. These assessments include tests for hemolytic capacity and resistance to antibiotics, PCR detection of virulence genes, and biogenic amine production [94,95,96]. Kang et al. [97] assessed the safety of W. cibaria CMU and CMS1 when used for oral care probiotics. Their results confirmed the strain is resistant to vancomycin and kanamycin (antibiotics) and that the resistance is intrinsic to the genus. They also demonstrated that the antibiotic resistance of W. cibaria CMU was not transferred to recipient strains. This was confirmed by the fact that no homology for a conjugative transposon integron-specific gene was present, i.e., there was no trace of antibiotic resistance genes in either chromosomal or plasmid DNA samples. They found that the strain had negative results for β-hemolysis, mucin degradation, and platelet aggregation tests. The strain also tested negative for various toxic secondary metabolites [97].
Until now, Weissella strains have only been associated with “weissellosis,” a disease that affects rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). The disease leads to the septicemia the fish and can cause important economic losses on fish farms. “Weissellosis” is caused by a specific species, the W. ceti [98,99,100]. Because certain Weissella strains are resistant to antibiotics such as vancomycin, teicoplanin, ceftazidime, and sulfamethoxazole, human infections remain a possibility. These would primarily affect immunocompromised patients [3, 101]. It should be noted, however, that even generally recognized probiotic strains may cause health complications. Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG and L. helveticus are two examples of this [102, 103].
Even though there are few cases of this genus causing disease in humans or animals, recent studies have evaluated the safety of Weissella use in foods. Any strain considered for use in fermented foods must be approved by government regulatory commissions. Although Brazil, the USA, and European Union countries do not have specific legislation for the production of new types of yeast, they do have recommendations. In the USA, for example, some cultures are classified as safe and suitable for human consumption while others are classified as GRAS and must apply for approval from the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) [104].
In 2011, some Weissella species, including W. confusa, were added to the International Dairy Federation (IDF) inventory, a list of microorganisms allowed in food fermentation processes. The German Committee for Biological Agents has also placed W. confusa in Risk Group 1 for microorganism that are unlikely to cause human diseases [105]. W. confusa’s important technological potential as a source of probiotics and other health benefits have led to two studies that address the microorganism’s safety [105, 106]. Cupi, Elvig-Jørgensen [106] carried out a series of toxicity tests which included genotoxicity, skin irritation, eye irritation, and sub-chronic oral toxicity in rats. They found that the W. confusa strain did not show any toxic effects and therefore can be used as a safe, direct-feed microbial product for animals. Kang et al. [97] showed that W. cibaria strains could be granted GRAS status in the future because: (i) they do not have antibiotic-resistant genes, (ii) they lack antibiotic resistance transferability, (iii) their genomic sequences do not include virulent genes related to pathogenic bacteria, and (iv) they tested negative for most virulent factors (β-hemolysis, mucin degradation, etc.) and for toxic metabolic production (ammonia production, β-glucuronidase activity, etc.).
Although many studies have demonstrated the safety of Weissella, the genus has not yet been included in the Qualified Presumption of Safety (QPS) list published by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) [107]. Research on W. cibaria and W. confusa has been carried out to this end [96]. To be granted the QPS status, a microorganism must meet the following criteria: (i) its taxonomic identity must be well defined, (ii) the available body of knowledge must be enough to establish its safety, (iii) the lack of pathogenic properties must be established and substantiated, and (iv) its intended use must be clearly described [107].
Conclusion
Over the past 5 years, the Weissella genus has been the focus of many studies due to its strong potential as a probiotic that could be used in both the food and pharmaceutical industries. Weissella strains’ probiotic potential is attributed to its remarkable ability to survive passage through the GIT, produce antimicrobial substances for a variety of pathogens, and promote the formation of compounds that stimulate the gut microbiome. The ability of some Weissella strains to produce large amounts of EPS represents another major attribute, as EPS have prebiotic properties. Weissella EPS production also demonstrates the strains’ potential as a natural thickener for foods, among other possibilities.
Moreover, recent studies have demonstrated that Weissella strains do not have antibiotic-resistant genes and they generally test negative for virulent factors. Thus, there is a low probability that the genus could cause foodborne diseases or carry on virulent genes that may be transferred to other bacteria pathogens.
References
Collins MD, Samelis J, Metaxopoulos J, Wallbanks S (1993) Taxonomic studies on some leuconostoc-like organisms from fermented sausages: description of a new genus Weissella for the Leuconostoc paramesenteroides group of species. J Appl Bacteriol 75:595–603. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.1993.tb01600.x
Fusco V, Quero GM, Cho GS et al (2015) The genus Weissella: taxonomy, ecology and biotechnological potential. Front Microbiol 6:22. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00155
Huys G, Leisner J, Björkroth J (2012) The lesser LAB gods: Pediococcus, Leuconostoc, Weissella, Carnobacterium, and affiliated genera. In: Lahtinen S, Ouwehand AC, Salminen S, Von WA (eds) Lactic Acid Bacteria, Microbiological and Funcional Aspects, fouth. Taylor & Francis Group, New York, pp 94–112
Niven CF, Evans JB (1957) Lactobacillus viridescens nov. spec., a heterofermentative species that produces a green discoloration of cured meat pigments. J Bacteriol 73:758–759
Garvie EI (1967) The growth factor and amino acid requirements of species of the genus Leuconostoc, including Leuconostoc paramesenteroides (sp. nov.) and Leuconostoc oenos. J Gen Microbiol 48:439–447. https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-48-3-439
Holzapfel WH, Van WEP (1982) Lactobacillus kandleri sp. nov., a new species of the subgenus Betabacterium, with glycine in the peptidoglycan. Zentralblatt für Bakteriol Mikrobiol und Hyg I Abt Orig C Allg Angew und ökologische Mikrobiol 3:495–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0721-9571(82)80007-0
Kandler O, Schillinger U, Weiss N (1983) Lactobacillus halotolerans sp. nov., nom. rev. and Lactobacillus minor sp. nov., nom. rev. Syst Appl Microbiol 4:280–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0723-2020(83)80056-3
Tanasupawat S, Shida O, Okada S (2016) Weissella thailandensis sp. nov., isolated from fermented fish in Thailand. 023838:1479–1485
Magnusson J, Jonsson H, Schnurer J, Roos S (2002) Weissella soli sp. nov., a lactic acid bacterium isolated from soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 52:831–834. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.02015-0
Björkroth KJ, Schillinger U, Geisen R et al (2002) Taxonomic study of Weissella confusa and description of Weissella cibaria sp. nov., detected in food and clinical samples. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 52:141–148. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-52-1-141
Lee J-S, Lee KC, Ahn J-S et al (2002) Weissella koreensis sp. nov., isolated from kimchi. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 52:1257–1261
De Bruyne K, Camu N, Lefebvre K et al (2008) Weissella ghanensis sp. nov., isolated from a Ghanaian cocoa fermentation. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 58:2721–2725. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.65853-0
Padonou SW, Schillinger U, Nielsen DS et al (2010) Weissella beninensis sp. nov., a motile lactic acid bacterium from submerged cassava fermentations, and emended description of the genus Weissella. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 60:2193–2198. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.014332-0
De Bruyne K, Camu N, De Vuyst L, Vandamme P (2010) Weissella fabaria sp. nov., from a Ghanaian cocoa fermentation. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 60:1999–2005. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.019323-0
Vela AI, Fernández A, de Quirós YB et al (2011) Weissella ceti sp. nov., isolated from beaked whales (Mesoplodon bidens). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 61:2758–2762. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.028522-0
Snauwaert I, Papalexandratou Z, De Vuyst L, Vandamme P (2013) Characterization of strains of Weissella fabalis sp. nov. and Fructobacillus tropaeoli from spontaneous cocoa bean fermentations. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 63:1709–1716. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.040311-0
Tohno M, Kitahara M, Inoue H et al (2013) Weissella oryzae sp. nov., isolated from fermented rice grains. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 63:1417–1420. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.043612-0
Oh SJ, Shin N-R, Hyun D-W et al (2013) Weissella diestrammenae sp. nov., isolated from the gut of a camel cricket (Diestrammena coreana). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 63:2951–2956. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.047548-0
Nisiotou A, Dourou D, Filippousi M-E et al (2014) Weissella uvarum sp. nov., isolated from wine grapes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 64:3885–3890. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.066209-0
Heo J, Hamada M, Cho H et al (2019) Weissella cryptocerci sp. nov., isolated from gut of the insect Cryptocercus kyebangensis. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 69:2801–2806. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.003564
Praet J, Meeus I, Cnockaert M et al (2015) Novel lactic acid bacteria isolated from the bumble bee gut : Convivina intestini gen. nov., sp. nov., Lactobacillus bombicola sp. nov., and Weissella bombi sp. nov. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, J Microbiol 107:1337–1349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-015-0429-z
Lee S, Ku H, Ahn M et al (2015) Weissella jogaejeotgali sp. nov., isolated from jogae jeotgal, a traditional Korean fermented seafood. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 65:4674–4681. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.000631
Choi H, Cheigh C, Kim S et al (2002) Weissella kimchii sp. nov., a novel lactic acid bacterium from kimchi. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 52:507–511
Lin S-T, Wang L-T, Wu Y-C et al (2020) Weissella muntiaci sp. nov., isolated from faeces of Formosan barking deer (Muntiacus reevesi). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 70:1578–1584
Li YQ, Tian WL, Gu CT (2020) Weissella sagaensis sp. nov., isolated from traditional Chinese yogurt. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 70:2485–2492
Adesulu-Dahunsi AT, Sanni AI, Jeyaram K (2018) Production, characterization and in vitro antioxidant activities of exopolysaccharide from Weissella cibaria GA44. LWT - Food Sci Technol 87:432–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2017.09.013
Dey DK, Koo BG, Sharma C, Kang SC (2019) Characterization of Weissella confusa DD_A7 isolated from kimchi. LWT - Food Sci Technol 111:663–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2019.05.089
Benhouna IS, Heumann A, Rieu A et al (2019) Exopolysaccharide produced by Weissella confusa: chemical characterisation, rheology and bioactivity. Int Dairy J 90:88–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2018.11.006
Dey DK, Khan I, Kang SC (2019) Anti-bacterial susceptibility profiling of Weissella confusa DD _ A7 against the multidrug-resistant ESBL-positive E. coli. Microb Pthogenes 128:119–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2018.12.048
Anandharaj M, Sivasankari B, Santhanakaruppu R et al (2015) Determining the probiotic potential of cholesterol-reducing Lactobacillus and Weissella strains isolated from gherkins (fermented cucumber) and south Indian fermented koozh. Res Microbiol 166:428–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resmic.2015.03.002
Yu H-S, Lee N-K, Choi A-J et al (2019) Antagonistic and antioxidant effect of probiotic Weissella cibaria JW15. Food Sci Biotechnol 28:851–855. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-018-0519-6
Xia Y, Qin S, Shen Y (2019) Probiotic potential of Weissella strains isolated from horse feces. Microb Pathog 132:117–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2019.04.032
Adesulu-Dahunsi AT, Sanni AI, Jeyaram K (2017) Rapid differentiation among Lactobacillus, Pediococcus and Weissella species from some Nigerian indigenous fermented foods. LWT - Food Sci Technol 77:39–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2016.11.007
Shin J, Oh G, Bang M et al (2020) Complete genome sequence of Weissella cibaria strain BM2, isolated from Korean kimchi. Microbiol Resour Announc 9:10–11
Månberger A, Verbrugghe P, Guðmundsdóttir EE et al (2020) Taxogenomic assessment and genomic characterisation of Weissella cibaria strain 92 able to metabolise oligosaccharides derived from dietary fibres. Sci Rep 10:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-62610-x
Falasconi I, Fontana A, Patrone V et al (2020) Genome-assisted characterization of Lactobacillus fermentum, Weissella cibaria, and Weissella confusa strains isolated from sorghum as starters for sourdough fermentation. Microorganisms 8:1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8091388
Patrone V, Al-Surrayai T, Romaniello F et al (2020) Integrated phenotypic-genotypic analysis of candidate probiotic Weissella cibaria strains isolated from dairy cows in Kuwait. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-020-09715-x
Mun SY, Chang HC (2020) Characterization of Weissella koreensis sk isolated from kimchi fermented at low temperature (Around 0◦ C) based on complete genome sequence and corresponding phenotype. Microorganisms 8:1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8081147
Kim E, Cho Y, Lee Y et al (2017) A proteomic approach for rapid identification of Weissella species isolated from Korean fermented foods on MALDI-TOF MS supplemented with an in-house database. Int J Food Microbiol 243:9–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.11.027
Nacef M, Chevalier M, Chollet S et al (2017) MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry for the identi fi cation of lactic acid bacteria isolated from a French cheese : the Maroilles. Int J Food Microbiol 247:2–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.07.005
Heperkan ZD, Bolluk M, Bülbül S (2020) Structural analysis and properties of dextran produced by Weissella confusa and the effect of different cereals on its rheological characteristics. Int J Biol Macromol 143:305–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.12.036
Jeong SE, Chun BH, Kim KH et al (2018) Genomic and metatranscriptomic analyses of Weissella koreensis reveal its metabolic and fermentative features during kimchi fermentation. Food Microbiol 76:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2018.04.003
Rizzello CG, Coda R, Wang Y et al (2019) Characterization of indigenous Pediococcus pentosaceus, Leuconostoc kimchii, Weissella cibaria and Weissella confusa for faba bean bioprocessing. Int J Food Microbiol 302:24–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2018.08.014
Alcázar-Valle M, Lugo-Cervantes E, Mojica L et al (2020) Bioactive compounds, antioxidant activity, and antinutritional content of legumes: a comparison between four Phaseolus Species. Molecules 25:3528
López-Hernández M, Rodríguez-Alegría ME, López-Munguía A, Wacher C (2018) Evaluation of xylan as carbon source for Weissella spp., a predominant strain in pozol fermentation. LWT - Food Sci Technol 89:192–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2017.10.030
Cheng JR, Liu XM, Chen ZY et al (2016) Mulberry anthocyanin biotransformation by intestinal probiotics. Food Chem 213:721–727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.07.032
Abriouel H, Lerma LL, del Casado Muñoz MC et al (2015) The controversial nature of the Weissella genus: Technological and functional aspects versus whole genome analysis-based pathogenic potential for their application in food and health. Front Microbiol 6:1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.01197
Kang MS, Lee DS, Lee SA et al (2020) Effects of probiotic bacterium Weissella cibaria CMU on periodontal health and microbiota: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. BMC Oral Health 20:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-01231-2
Lee DS, Lee SA, Kim M et al (2020) Reduction of halitosis by a tablet containing Weissella cibaria CMU: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J Med Food 23:649–657. https://doi.org/10.1089/jmf.2019.4603
Lee YJ, Lee A, Yoo HJ et al (2018) Supplementation with the probiotic strain Weissella cibaria JW15 enhances natural killer cell activity in nondiabetic subjects. J Funct Foods 48:153–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2018.07.009
Adebayo-Tayo B, Ishola R, Oyewunmi T (2018) Characterization, antioxidant and immunomodulatory potential on exopolysaccharide produced by wild type and mutant Weissella confusa strains. Biotechnol Reports 19:e00271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.btre.2018.e00271
Elshaghabee FMF, Ghadimi D, Habermann D et al (2020) Effect of oral administration of Weissella confusa on fecal and plasma ethanol concentrations, lipids and glucose metabolism in Wistar rats fed high fructose and fat diet. Hepatic Med Evid Res 12:93–106
Kim HY, Bae WY, Yu HS et al (2020) Inula britannica fermented with probiotic Weissella cibaria D30 exhibited anti-inflammatory effect and increased viability in RAW 264.7 cells. Food Sci Biotechnol 29:569–578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-019-00690-w
Lim SK, Kwon M-S, Lee J et al (2017) Weissella cibaria WIKIM28 ameliorates atopic dermatitis-like skin lesions by inducing tolerogenic dendritic cells and regulatory T cells in BALB/c mice. Sci Rep 7:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep40040
Park HE, Lee WK (2018) Immune enhancing effects of Weissella cibaria JW15 on BALB/c mice immunosuppressed by cyclophosphamide. J Funct Foods 49:518–525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2018.09.003
Fonseca JF, Alvim LB, Nunes C et al (2019) Probiotic effect of Bifidobacterium longum 51A and Weissella paramesenteroides WpK4 on gerbils infected with Giardia lamblia. J Appl Microbiol 127:1184–1191. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.14338
Do K, Park H, Kang M et al (2019) Effects of Weissella cibaria CMU on halitosis and calculus, plaque, and gingivitis indices in beagles. J Vet Dent 36:135–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0898756419872562
Kim J, Jung BH, Lee JH et al (2020) Effect of Weissella cibaria on the reduction of periodontal tissue destruction in mice. J Periodontol 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/jper.19-0288
Perlman RL (2016) Mouse models of human disease: an evolutionary perspective. Evol Med Public Heal 2016:170–176. https://doi.org/10.1093/emph/eow014
Stratakos AC, Linton M, Tessema GT et al (2016) Effect of high pressure processing in combination with Weissella viridescens as a protective culture against Listeria monocytogenes in ready-to-eat salads of different pH. Food Control 61:6–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.09.020
Lakra AK, Domdi L, Hanjon G et al (2020) Some probiotic potential of Weissella confusa MD1 and Weissella cibaria MD2 isolated from fermented batter. LWT - Food Sci Technol 125:109261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2020.109261
Pabari K, Pithva S, Kothari C et al (2020) Evaluation of probiotic properties and prebiotic utilization potential of Weissella paramesenteroides isolated from fruits. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins 12:1126–1138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-019-09630-w
Sharma S, Kandasamy S, Kavitake D, Shetty PH (2018) Probiotic characterization and antioxidant properties of Weissella confusa KR780676, isolated from an Indian fermented food. LWT - Food Sci Technol 97:53–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2018.06.033
Silva MS, Ramos CL, González-Avila M et al (2017) Probiotic properties of Weissella cibaria and Leuconostoc citreum isolated from tejuino – a typical Mexican beverage. LWT - Food Sci Technol 86:227–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2017.08.009
Ait Seddik H, Bendali F, Cudennec B, Drider D (2017) Anti-pathogenic and probiotic attributes of Lactobacillus salivarius and Lactobacillus plantarum strains isolated from feces of Algerian infants and adults. Res Microbiol 168:244–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resmic.2016.12.003
Cavalcante RGS, de Albuquerque TMR, de Luna Freire MO et al (2019) The probiotic Lactobacillus fermentum 296 attenuates cardiometabolic disorders in high fat diet-treated rats. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 29:1408–1417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.numecd.2019.08.003
Liang X, Lv Y, Zhang Z et al (2020) Study on intestinal survival and cholesterol metabolism of probiotics. LWT - Food Sci Technol 124:109–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2020.109132
Deatraksa J, Sunthornthummas S, Rangsiruji A et al (2018) Isolation of folate-producing Weissella spp. from Thai fermented fish (Plaa Som Fug). LWT - Food Sci Technol 89:388–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2017.11.016
Hsieh YC, Chou LS, Lin CH et al (2019) Serum folate levels in bipolar disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Psychiatry 19:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-019-2269-2
Bounaix MS, Gabriel V, Morel S et al (2009) Biodiversity of exopolysaccharides produced from sucrose by sourdough lactic acid bacteria. J Agric Food Chem 57:10889–10897. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf902068t
Hu Y, Gänzle MG (2018) Effect of temperature on production of oligosaccharides and dextran by Weissella cibaria 10 M. Int J Food Microbiol 280:27–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2018.05.003
Kanimozhi J, Ganesh Moorthy I, Sivashankar R, Sivasubramanian V (2017) Optimization of dextran production by Weissella cibaria NITCSK4 using response surface methodology-genetic algorithm based technology. Carbohydr Polym 174:103–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.06.021
Devi PB, Kavitake D, Shetty PH (2016) Physico-chemical characterization of galactan exopolysaccharide produced by Weissella confusa KR780676. Int J Biol Macromol 93:822–828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.09.054
Ye G, Chen Y, Wang C et al (2018) Purification and characterization of exopolysaccharide produced by Weissella cibaria YB-1 from pickle Chinese cabbage. Int J Biol Macromol 120:1315–1321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.09.019
Yu Y-J, Chen Z, Chen PT, Ng I-S (2018) Production, characterization and antibacterial activity of exopolysaccharide from a newly isolated Weissella cibaria under sucrose effect. J Biosci Bioeng 126:769–777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiosc.2018.05.028
Zhu Y, Wang C, Jia S et al (2018) Purification, characterization and antioxidant activity of the exopolysaccharide from Weissella cibaria SJ14 isolated from Sichuan paocai. Int J Biol Macromol 115:820–828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.04.067
Baruah R, Deka B, Goyal A (2017) Purification and characterization of dextransucrase from Weissella cibaria RBA12 and its application in in vitro synthesis of prebiotic oligosaccharides in mango and pineapple juices. LWT - Food Sci Technol 84:449–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2017.06.012
Shi Q, Juvonen M, Hou Y et al (2016) Lactose- and cellobiose-derived branched trisaccharides and a sucrose-containing trisaccharide produced by acceptor reactions of Weissella confusa dextransucrase. Food Chem 190:226–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.05.090
Nolte J, Kempa A, Schlockermann A et al (2019) Glycosylation of caffeic acid and structural analogues catalyzed by novel glucansucrases from Leuconostoc and Weissella species. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol 19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2019.101114
Rosca I, Petrovici AR, Peptanariu D et al (2018) Biosynthesis of dextran by Weissella confusa and its in vitro functional characteristics. Int J Biol Macromol 107:1765–1772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.10.048
Kavitake D, Devi PB, Shetty PH (2016) Characterization of a novel galactan produced by Weissella confusa KR780676 from an acidic fermented food. Int J Biol Macromol 86:681–689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.01.099
Baruah R, Maina NH, Katina K et al (2016) Functional food applications of dextran from Weissella cibaria RBA12 from pummelo (Citrus maxima). Int J Food Microbiol 242:124–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.11.012
Zannini E, Waters DM, Coffey A, Arendt EK (2016) Production, properties, and industrial food application of lactic acid bacteria-derived exopolysaccharides. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 100:1121–1135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-015-7172-2
Zannini E, Jeske S, Lynch KM, Arendt EK (2018) Development of novel quinoa-based yoghurt fermented with dextran producer Weissella cibaria MG1. Int J Food Microbiol 268:19–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2018.01.001
Rolim PM, Hu Y, Gänzle MG (2019) Sensory analysis of juice blend containing isomalto-oligosaccharides produced by fermentation with Weissella cibaria. Food Res Int 124:86–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2018.08.089
Tang X, Zhang B, Huang W et al (2019) Hydration, water distribution and microstructure of gluten during freeze thaw process: Role of a high molecular weight dextran produced by Weissella confusa QS813. Food Hydrocoll 90:377–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2018.10.025
Xu Y, Pitkänen L, Maina NH et al (2018) Interactions between fava bean protein and dextrans produced by Leuconostoc pseudomesenteroides DSM 20193 and Weissella cibaria Sj 1b. Carbohydr Polym 190:315–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.02.082
Xu Y, Wang Y, Coda R et al (2017) In situ synthesis of exopolysaccharides by Leuconostoc spp. and Weissella spp. and their rheological impacts in fava bean flour. Int J Food Microbiol 248:63–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2017.02.012
Mathur S, Singh R (2005) Antibiotic resistance in food lactic acid bacteria - a review. Int J Food Microbiol 105:281–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2005.03.008
Toomey N, Bolton D, Fanning S (2010) Characterisation and transferability of antibiotic resistance genes from lactic acid bacteria isolated from Irish pork and beef abattoirs. Res Microbiol 161:127–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resmic.2009.12.010
Džidić S, Šušković J, Kos B (2008) Antibiotic resistance mechanisms in bacteria: biochemical and genetic aspects. Food Technol Biotechnol 46:11–21
Ammor MS, Belén Flórez A, Mayo B (2007) Antibiotic resistance in non-enterococcal lactic acid bacteria and bifidobacteria. Food Microbiol 24:559–570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2006.11.001
Perin LM, Miranda RO, Todoroc SD et al (2014) Virulence, antibiotic resistance and biogenic amines of bacteriocinogenic lactococci and enterococci isolated from goat milk. Int J Food Microbiol 185:121–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2014.06.001
Fhoula I, Rehaiem A, Najjari A et al (2018) Functional probiotic assessment and in vivo cholesterol-lowering efficacy of Weissella sp. associated with arid lands living-hosts. Biomed Res Int 2018:11 pages. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1654151
Mortezaei F, Royan M, Noveirian HA et al (2020) In vitro assessment of potential probiotic characteristics of indigenous Lactococcus lactis and Weissella oryzae isolates from rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss Walbaum). J Appl Microbiol 129:1004–1019. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.14652
Quattrini M, Korcari D, Ricci G, Fortina MG (2019) A polyphasic approach to characterize Weissella cibaria and Weissella confusa strains. J Appl Microbiol 128:500–512. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.14483
Kang MS, Yeu JE, Hong SP (2019) Safety evaluation of oral care probiotics Weissella cibaria CMU and CMS1 by phenotypic land genotypic analysis. Int J Mol Sci 20:22 pages. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20112693
Figueiredo SP, Boari CA, de Souza Costa Sobrinho P et al (2015) Características do leite cru e do queijo Minas artesanal do Serro em diferentes meses. Arch Vet Sci 20:68–82. https://doi.org/10.5380/avs.v20i1.37243
Ortega JCC, Fajardo R, Irgang R et al (2018) Isolation characterization, virulence potential of Weissella ceti responsible for weissellosis outbreak in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) cultured in Mexico. Transbound Emerg Dis 65:1401–1407. https://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.12978
Welch TJ, Good CM (2013) Mortality associated with weissellosis (Weissella sp.) in USA farmed rainbow trout: potential for control by vaccination. Aquaculture 388–391:122–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2013.01.021
Aberkane S, Didelot MN, Carrière C et al (2017) Bactériémie à Weissella confusa: un pathogène opportuniste sous-estimé. Med Mal Infect 47:297–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medmal.2017.02.001
Freedman SB, Williamson-Urquhart S, Farion KJ et al (2018) Multicenter trial of a combination probiotic for children with gastroenteritis. N Engl J Med 379:2015–2026. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1802597
Schnadower D, Tarr PI, Casper T et al (2018) Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG versus placebo for acute gastroenteritis in children. N Engl J Med 379:2002–2014. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1802598
Laulund S, Wind A, Derkx PMF, Zuliani V (2017) Regulatory and safety requirements for food cultures. Microorganisms 5:28. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms5020028
Sturino JM (2018) Literature-based safety assessment of an agriculture- and animal-associated microorganism: Weissella confusa. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 95:142–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2018.03.013
Cupi D, Elvig-Jørgensen SG (2019) Safety assessment of Weissella confusa – a direct-fed microbial candidate. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 107:104414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2019.104414
Panel EB, Koutsoumanis K, Allende A et al (2019) The list of QPS status recommended biological agents for safety risk assessments carried out by EFSA. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.3336268
Tenea GN, Hurtado P, Ortega C (2020) A novel Weissella cibaria strain UTNGt21O isolated from wild solanum quitoense fruit: genome sequence and characterization of a peptide with highly inhibitory potential toward Gram-negative bacteria. Foods 9(9):1242. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9091242
Pelyuntha W, Chaiyasut C, Kantachote D, Sirilun S (2020) Organic acids and 2,4-Di-tert-butylphenol: major compounds of Weissella confusa WM36 cell-free supernatant against growth, survival and virulence of Salmonella Typhi. PeerJ 8:e8410. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8410
Lakra AK, Domdi L, Tilwani YM, Arul V (2020) Physicochemical and functional characterization of mannan exopolysaccharide from Weissella confusa MD1 with bioactivities. Int J Biol Macromol 143:797–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.09.139
Funding
This work was supported by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq, Brasília, DF, Brazil), Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES, Brasília, DF, Brazil), and Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil). Research at Lille University is supported by CPER/FEDER Alibiotech grant 2016-2021.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Teixeira, C.G., Fusieger, A., Milião, G.L. et al. Weissella: An Emerging Bacterium with Promising Health Benefits. Probiotics & Antimicro. Prot. 13, 915–925 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-021-09751-1
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-021-09751-1