1 Correction to: Rare Met. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12598-021-01815-z

In the original publication, Fig. 5 was published with few mistakes. The correct version of Fig. 5 is given in this correction.

Fig. 5
figure 5

a H2 evolution rate of samples; b cycle stability of 6Cu–TiO2; c free energy versus reaction coordinates of TiO2 and 6Cu–TiO2 and (inset) 3D differential charge density of 6Cu–TiO2; d 2D differential charge density of 6Cu–TiO2, where yellow and blue colors represent positive and negative, respectively