Introduction

The meiofaunal family Nerillidae Levinsen, 1883 consists of 51 described species classified into 15 genera bearing seven to nine segments (Worsaae 2014). Nearly all species are known from marine or brackish environments from throughout the world (except for Antarctica), occurring from the intertidal zone to abyssal depths (Worsaae and Kristensen 2005; Worsaae and Rouse 2009). The only described freshwater species is Troglochaetus beranecki Delachaux, 1921, which has been found in both hyporheic and subterranean localities throughout the Northern Hemisphere (Jouin 1973; Morselli et al. 1998; Pennak 1971; Plesa 1977; Sambugar 2004; Särkkä and Mäkela 1998). Although members of the Nerillidae are found in varying environments, the highest diversity is found within interstitial habitats (Worsaae 2005a). Remarkably, several nerillids are found in numerous types of marine subterranean environments, including both marine and anchialine caves (Curini-Galletti et al. 2012; Martínez et al. 2009; Núñez et al. 1997; Sterrer and Iliffe 1982; Tilzer 1970; Worsaae et al. 2009).

Whereas marine caves hold high levels of exchange with the surrounding oceanic waters, anchialine caves are characterized by the presence of density-stratified water bodies of varying salinities, often steeply separated by haloclines, which are only challenged by subterranean tidal currents (Iliffe and Kornicker 2009; Gerovasileiou et al. 2016). Photosynthetic primary production in anchialine caves is limited to inland entrance pools, and the organic matter present in these cave systems may enter the system with marine tidal oscillations and percolation from overlying soil layers or be locally produced by chemoautotrophic bacteria (Gonzalez et al. 2011; Brankovits et al. 2017). Despite these specific ecological conditions, anchialine caves are inhabited by a comparatively rich and diverse fauna, characterized by high levels of endemism (Iliffe and Bishop 2009; Martínez et al. 2016).

Anchialine cave-exclusive species are termed stygobites and usually present a set of common adaptations collectively called “troglomorphisms,” which typically include the absence or reduction of eyes and pigmentation, elongation of body appendages, ability to endure starvation, and decreased metabolic rates (Iliffe and Bishop 2009). Crustaceans typically dominate the anchialine fauna, but recent studies have revealed an increased number of specialized lineages of annelids exclusive to caves, although only some of these can be characterized as stygobites (Gerovasileiou et al. 2016). For instance, several nerillids have been recorded in anchialine caves throughout the Caribbean, Bermuda, and the Canary Islands, but most of these records correspond to genera often found in the ocean and comprise benthic species morphologically similar to their marine relatives (Sterrer and Iliffe 1982; Núñez et al. 1997; Worsaae et al. 2009). In contrast, the only described species of Longipalpa, herein designated by the new name Speleonerilla saltatrix (Worsaae et al. 2004), presents a highly divergent morphology and a unique lifestyle compared to the remaining species of the family (Worsaae et al. 2004; Worsaae 2005a, b). Instead of gliding among the sand grains while feeding on detritus as most interstitial nerillids, S. saltatrix propels through the water column of anchialine caves by ciliary motion of their densely ciliated paired pygidial lobes, while using a pair of extremely long lateroventral palps to feed on suspended organic matter (Worsaae et al. 2004). Due to these unique adaptations for a swimming lifestyle, it is unlikely that S. saltatrix can survive outside of caves given the stronger currents and predators of the open marine waters; the species hereof representing a highly specialized, stygobitic nerillid.

While S. saltatrix has been so far the only described member of the genus, cave diving exploration in several unconnected localities throughout the Caribbean and the Canary Islands has yielded disparate new records of Speleonerilla. In this study, we describe three new species of Speleonerilla combining light, scanning electron, and confocal laser scanning microscopy, while reporting two additional populations for which only limited material was available and full descriptions could not be conducted. We also present the first phylogeny of the genus based on four molecular markers collected from all available material. These results are combined to discuss putative morphological adaptations of Speleonerilla to anchialine cave environments, as well as proposing alternative pathways for the diversification of this enigmatic group of microscopic, stygobitic annelids on both sides of the Atlantic.

Materials and methods

Collecting and processing of samples

Samples were collected from five different cave localities: the limestone caves Cherokee Road Extension Blue Hole “Magical Sinkhole” (Abaco, Bahamas), Casimba El Brinco (Ciénaga de Zapata, Matanzas, Cuba), Hoyo Verde (Gibara, Holguín, Cuba), and Cenote 27 Steps “Sistema Ah Kax Ha (Otra Avicola)” (Akumal, Quintana Roo, México). These caves are all characterized by high stratification in their water column, including freshwater, brackish, and saltwater layers separated by steep haloclines associated with redox layers and chemoautotrophic bacterial production (e.g., Gonzalez et al. 2011). In contrast, La Corona lava tube (Lanzarote, Canary Islands, Spain) is poorly stratified, lacks significant amounts of freshwater, and is affected by noticeable tidal currents bringing organic matter into the system (Wilkens et al. 2009).

All samples were collected using conical plankton nets with a diameter of 20–30 cm and a mesh size of 60 or 300 μm. Nets were towed by cave divers both within and below the halocline of each cave. Animals were sorted and photographed alive in the field using a Nikon D300 mounted on an Olympus SZX16 stereomicroscope. Prior to fixation, all animals were anesthetized with a 1:1 isotonic solution of MgCl2 and seawater.

Morphological examinations

Morphology was assessed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM), and light microscopy (LM).

Specimens examined using SEM were fixed in a solution of 2% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer (for 24 h at 4°C, and transferred to 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer), post-fixed in 2% osmium tetroxide (1 h), rinsed in Milli-Q water, dehydrated through an ascending ethanol series from 20 to 100%, and transferred to 100% acetone. Specimens in acetone were then critical point-dried, mounted on aluminum stubs, sputter-coated with platinum palladium (high resolution sputter coater JFC-2300HR), and examined with a JEOL JSM-6335F field emission scanning electron microscope at the Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen.

Specimens examined with CLSM were fixed using 2% paraformaldehyde in phosphate buffer solution with 0.2 M of sucrose (PFA, for 24 h at 4°C). Fixed specimens were subsequently rinsed over 4 h in phosphate buffer (PBS with 0.2 M sucrose) and stored at 4°C after the addition of 0.05% NaN3. Before immunostaining, specimens were preincubated for 1 h in PTA (PBS containing 0.1% Triton X-100 and 0.25% bovine serum albumin). Samples were then incubated in the primary antibody (monoclonal mouse anti-acetylated α-tubulin; T6793, Sigma; dilution 1:200 in PTA) for ca. 16 h at room temperature, washed six times over 2 h in PBS, and incubated in secondary antibodies (anti-mouse cyanamine (CY5), 115-175-062, Jackson ImmunoResearch; dilution 1:400) for ca. 16 h in the dark at room temperature. Specimens were then washed six times over 2 h and incubated with DAPI (2201.08, Sigma; dilution 1:100) or CYBR-green (S4438, Sigma; dilution 1:100). Stained specimens were mounted between two coverslips with Fluoromount-G (Southern Biotech) or Vectashield (Vector Laboratories). Specimens mounted in Fluoromount-G were stored 24 h at 4 °C and then at least 24 h at −20°C prior to CLSM. Specimens mounted in Vectashield were analyzed with CLSM immediately after mounting. Preparations were investigated with an Olympus Fluoview FV-1000 CLSM (Worsaae Lab, University of Copenhagen, Denmark), with Fluoview v4.0 software. Maximum intensity projection of z-stacks and various rendering analyses were conducted with Imaris 7.7 (Bitplane Scientific Software).

Light microscopy observations were done both on glutaraldehyde- and paraformaldehyde-fixed specimens mounted in glycerol. Measurements and photographs were taken using an OLYMPUS DP73 camera mounted on an Olympus IX70 inverted compound microscope equipped with CellSens Entry v.1.9 software. Measurements were taken from scaled SEM or CLSM pictures using ImageJ 1.47v (Schneider et al. 2012) and Olympus CellSens Entry v.1.9 software.

All types (holo- and paratypes, both on stubs and mounted in glycerol) are deposited at the Natural History Museum Denmark (NHMD-218142–NHMD-21855, NHMD-218167–NHMD-218182).

Molecular analyses

Six species of Speleonerilla and four nerillid outgroups were included in the phylogenetic analyses (see Table 1). DNA was extracted using a Qiagen DNeasy Tissue and Blood kit following the protocols provided by the manufacturer. DNA elution (~ 100–160 μL) was repeated twice to maximize the amount of DNA yielded. Ribosomal markers 18S rRNA (ca. 1800 bp) and 28S rRNA (ca. 1100 bp), as well as the protein coding markers cytochrome c-oxidase subunit I (COI, ca. 650 bp), and histone 3 (H3, ca. 330 bp) were amplified. Primers for 18S rRNA included 18S-1F/18S-5R (Giribet et al. 1996), G51/G747 (Hillis and Dixon 1991; Ibrahim et al. 2011), and G952/G944 (Cohen et al. 2004; Lovejoy and Potvin 2011); for 28S rRNA, it included primers G758/G1275 (Brown et al. 1999; Markmann 2000); primers for COI included LCO1490/HCO2198 (Folmer et al. 1994) and dgLCO1490/dgHCO2198 (Meyer 2003); and primers for histone 3 included H3aF/H3aR (Colgan et al. 1998). Polymerase chain reactions (PCR) followed a profile optimized during previous studies (see above) and used a Bio-Rad S100 Thermal Cycler. Amplified products were resolved in agarose gels, purified using EZNA Cycle-Pure kit (Omega Bio-tek), and sequenced by Macrogen Europe. Quality assessments of chromatograms and contig assemblages were done using Sequencher v. 4.10.1 (GeneCodes Corporation), and all contigs were subsequently blasted to check for contamination.

Table 1 Data obtained for Speleonerilla spp. and four outgroups of the phylogenetic analyses

Sequences for each gene were visualized using BioEdit (Hall 1999) and aligned using the MAFFT online platform (Katoh et al. 2010). Protein coding genes COI and H3 were translated into amino acids and checked for indels and stop codons in Mesquite v.3.5. The interactive refinement algorithm Q-INS-I (Katoh and Toh 2008) was selected for alignments of 18S rRNA and 28S rRNA, as it incorporates information on the secondary structure of each ribosomal gene. The option “nwildcard” was selected for both cases, as it does not designate missing data as gaps. Gene fragments COI and H3 were constant in length and therefore trivial in alignment, but we checked for directionality using the quick interactive refinement algorithm L-INS-I (Katoh et al. 2005). Individual gene datasets were concatenated using Sequence Matrix (Vaidya et al. 2011).

Concatenated molecular datasets were analyzed using maximum likelihood and Bayesian methods. Maximum likelihood (ML) partitioned analyses were conducted using RAxML version 7.2.8 (Stamatakis 2006). A default general time reversible model with corrections for a discrete gamma distribution (GTR + Γ) was specified for each partition. Nodal support was estimated via nonparametric bootstrapping (Felsenstein 1985) with 1000 replicates and a GTR + Γ model. Bayesian analyses (BA) were performed using MrBayes version 3.2.5 (Ronquist and Huelsenbeck 2003). Datasets were run with four independent analyses using four chains (three heated and one cold) for 60 million generations, with sampling every 1000 generations. Burnin was set to 20 million. Convergence of all Monte Carlo Markov chain runs was assessed using TRACER v1.6.0 (Rambaut and Drummond 2007). Prior to Bayesian analyses, jModelTest (Posada 2008) was used to infer the optimal evolutionary model for each gene, which was selected using the corrected Akaike information criterion (AICc) (Posada and Buckley 2004). A GTR + Γ and a proportion of invariable sites (GTR + I + Γ) were selected for 18S rRNA, 28S rRNA, and COI, while a GTR model with gamma distribution (GTR + Γ) was implemented for H3. All analyses were run on the CIPRES science gateway (Miller et al. 2010).

Results

Family Nerillidae Levinsen, 1883

Genus Speleonerilla Worsaae, Sterrer & Iliffe, 2018. Speleonerilla is new replacement name for Longipalpa Worsaae, Sterrer & Iliffe, 2004 [preoccupied: Longipalpa Pagenstecher, 1900 (Insecta: Lepidoptera) (see Pagenstecher,1900)]. ZooBank number: urn:lsid:zoobank.org: act:92DDA88E-8A3C-4A3F-B13E-211DC0576F17.

Emended diagnosis (from Worsaae et al. 2004)

Nerillids with eight or nine chaetigerous segments. Prostomium with two very long cirriform ventrolateral palps (equal to body length), no eyes, three short antennae. Pygidium with two filiform cirri, a dorso-terminal anus between two unique, densely ciliated lobes. All segments with long compound chaetae. Each body segment with transverse ventral and dorsal rows containing up to eight ciliary tufts. Two or three pairs of segmental nephridia opening in segments III and IV, or III, IV, and V. Hermaphroditic with one or two pairs of spermioducts opening in segments VII, or VI and VII, and one pair of oviducts opening in segment VIII.

Remarks

A new generic name, Speleonerilla nov. nom., is here proposed in order to eliminate the homonymy between the genera Longipalpa Pagenstecher, 1900, junior synonymy of Bytharia Walker, 1865 (Geometridae, Lepidoptera) (see Walker, 1865) and Longipalpa Worsaae, Sterrer and Iliffe, 2004 (Nerillidae, Annelida).

Speleonerilla calypso sp. n.

Figures 1, 2, and 3; Tables 1, 2, 3, and 4

Fig. 1
figure 1

Speleonerilla calypso sp. n. Light microscopy images of a the entire specimen with both palps in dorsal view; b detail of parapodial cirrus on segment V; c detail of chaetae with shaft, extension shaft and blade; d detail of glandular cells on dorsal surface of segments III–IV; e maximum intensity projection of CLSM image stack showing segmentally arranged nephridia, oviducts, and spermioducts in ventrolateral view (pink—acetylated α-tubulin-like immunoreactivity, cyan—DAPI). bl, chaetal blade; cec, cirumesophageal connective; cs, chaetal shaft; eg, egg; es, extension shaft; gc, glandular cells; ne1–3, nephridium 1–3; od, oviduct; pa, palps; pc, parapodial cirrus; pl, pygidial lobe; sd, spermioduct; vlnv, ventrolateral nerve cord; I–VIII, segments I–VIII

Fig. 2
figure 2

Speleonerilla calypso sp. n. Scanning electron micrographs of a entire specimen (both palps lost) in dorsal view; b prostomium with three dorsal antennae, dorsal view; c peristomium, ventral view; d prostomium with anterior field of sensory cilia (as), antero-dorsal view; e mapping of as; f dorsal view of palp; g detail of palp. an, anterior field of sensory cilia; bl, chaetal blade; cs, chaetal shaft; ct, cilary tufts; dt, dorsal ciliary tufts; la, lateral antenna; lc, prostomial lateral ciliation; ma, median antenna; mo, mouth; pa, palps; pc, parapodial cirri; pl, pydigial lobe; po, posterior field of sensory cilia; pr, prostomium; rc, rudimental cirrus; vt, ventral ciliary tufts; I–VIII, segments I–VIII

Fig. 3
figure 3

Speleonerilla calypso sp. n. Scanning electron micrographs of a neuropodial chateal lobe on segment I, ventral view (all chaetae lost); b neuropodial chaetal lobe on segment II in dorsolateral view; c four dorsal ciliary tufts on segment III; d segments VII–VIII with gonopores and parapodial cirrus, lateral view; e segments VII–VIII with ventral ciliary band and ventral gonopores; f posterior body with terminal pygidigial lobes and ciliary tufts. ct, cilary tufts; gp, gonopore; nec, neurochaetae (chaetal holes, since chaetae are missing); nl, neuropodial chaetal lobe; noc, notopodial chaetae (chaetal holes, since chaetae are missing); pc, parapodial cirri; pl, pydigial lobe; vb, ventral ciliary band; II–VIII, segments II–VIII

Table 2 Measurements and morphometric characters of Speleonerilla spp.
Table 3 Comparison of the main characteristics of Speleonerilla spp.
Table 4 Speleonerilla spp. distance matrix of all genes sequenced

Type material

Holotype (NHMD-218142) on SEM stub, 501 μm long, Cherokee Road Extension Blue Hole “Magical Sinkhole,” Bahamas, Abaco Island, water column, 15–20 m depth, 26.3755–77.1041, December 2008 (Coll: B.C. Gonzalez & T.M. Iliffe). Paratypes: 20 from the same collecting trip as holotype with nine specimens (NHMD-218143) placed on the same SEM stub as holotype, one specimen placed on separate SEM stub (NHMD-218144), nine specimens mounted in glycerol as permanent whole mounts (NHMD-218145–NHMD-218153); two additional whole mounts (for CLSM, NHMD-21854, NHMD-21855) from the same locality as holotype but collected 11 March 2017 (Coll: T.M. Iliffe, L. Ballou & J. Olesen). ZooBank number: urn:lsid:zoobank.org: act:DA703609-D0F9-4FDF-B933-AFE28333E89E.

Diagnosis

Speleonerilla with eight segments. Parapodium with up to 15 compound chaetae per fascicle. Rudimental cirri on segment I. Parapodial interramal cirri on segments III–VIII. Neuropodial chaetal lobes on segments II–VIII. Three pairs of nephridia opening in segments III, IV, and V. Hermaphroditic with one pair of spermioducts and one pair of oviducts opening in segments VII and VIII, respectively.

Etymology

The species is named after the dance calypso, which originated in Trinidad & Tobago and later spread to other Caribbean Islands, including the Bahamas.

Description

All measurements from holotype, numbers given in parentheses from paratypes; most measures are from SEM preparations (see Table 2). Body with eight chaetigerous segments (Fig. 1a and 2a), 501 μm long (464–895 μm, n = 17), 167 μm wide including parapodia (142–298 μm, n = 17), 126 μm excluding parapodia (86–218 μm, n = 17). Segments I–IV equal in length, segments V–VIII decreasing in length posteriorly, pygidium shortest, 24 μm (16–36 μm, n = 9).

Prostomium short and rounded (Figs. 1a and 2a), 60 μm long (26–60 μm, n = 13), 43 μm wide (43–110 μm, n = 10), with two thread-like ventrolateral palps (Figs. 1a and 2f) and three short antennae (Fig. 2a–c). Palps maximum 425 μm long (400–620 μm, n = 9), lateral antennae maximum 29 μm long (26–35 μm, n = 10), median antenna 17 μm long (16–22 μm, n = 3). Eyes absent. Nuchal organs appear as round elevated bulges on lateral sides of prostomium situated between palps and parapodia of segment I (not shown). Large glandular cells line midgut wall (Fig. 1d).

Segment I with uniramous parapodia, 36 μm long (24–50 μm, n = 12), segments II–VIII with biramous parapodia, maximum 34 μm long (24–52 μm, n = 10) (Figs. 1a and 2a). Rudimental parapodial cirri (Fig. 2c) on segment I, 23 μm long (7–23 μm, n = 7). Interramal parapodial cirri on segments III–VIII (Figs. 1a, 2a, and 3d), maximum 60 μm long (43–77 μm, n = 14); parapodial cirri cylindrical and slightly increasing in length toward pygidium (Fig. 2a). Parapodial cirri with glandular oval cells throughout (Fig. 1b). Neuropodial chaetal lobe on segments II–VIII (Fig. 3b), absent on segment I.

Pygidium short, with two lobes (Figs. 1a, 2a, and 3f), 36 μm long (19–52 μm, n = 14), each with two projections and dense ciliation (Fig. 3f). Pygidial cirri not observed, but two scars visible with SEM (Fig. 3f).

All chaetae compound (Figs. 1c and 2a); shafts with small pointed distal extension, 2 μm long (2–3 μm, n = 5). Alternating pocket-like structures projecting outwards along shaft margins. Blades lacking ornamentation. Segment I, with 14 chaetae per fascicle (10–14, n = 6); segments II–VIII each with dorsal and ventral fascicles of up to 15 (9–15, n = 3) and up to 14 chaetae (7–14, n = 4). Shaft maximum 137 μm long (137–189 μm, n = 10), blade maximum 24 μm long (19–41 μm, n = 10); total length maximum 161 μm (161–216 μm, n = 11).

Prostomium with paired lateral ciliary bands extending laterally between bases of each lateral antenna and insertion of palp (Fig. 2b). Prostomium with anterior field of sensory cilia arranged in an X pattern anterior of the antennae (Fig. 2d, e); posterior to the median antenna with field of several individual cilia (Fig. 2b). Two dense tufts of cilia present on each ventrolateral side of ventral mouth ciliary field (Fig. 2c).

Palps with ventral and frontal longitudinal ciliary bands extending from the insertion to the tip of the palp (Fig. 2c, f). Palp ventral ciliary band consists of tufts with > 25 cilia, up to 18 μm long (not observed in holotype; n = 1) and spaced 8 μm apart (Fig. 2f). Palp frontal ciliary band consists of individually arranged, presumably sensory, cilia. Few individual cilia (~ 4), 7 μm long, are found scattered between both bands (Fig. 2g).

Dorsal body ciliation consisting of transverse rows of ciliary tufts (up to four) on segments I–VIII at the level of parapodia (Fig. 3c). Each tuft with more than 50 motile cilia. Ventral body surface with dense ciliation, consisting of mouth ciliation (Fig. 2c), a narrow midventral ciliary band extending from mouth to anus, continuing dorsally atop pygidium, and transverse rows of four–eight ciliary tufts at each segment (Fig. 3b, d, e, Table 2). Additional single ventral ciliary tufts on each ventrolateral side, between prostomium and segment I (Fig. 2c) and between segments I and II (not shown) (Table 2).

Hermaphroditic. Nephridia and gonoducts investigated using CLSM (Fig. 1e). Three pairs of segmental nephridia, running dorsoventrally, parallel to ventral nerve cord, nephridiopores opening ventrally in segments III, IV, and V near segment borders. Enteronephridia not observed. One pair of relatively straight spermioducts, opening in segment VII and one pair of straight oviducts opening in segment VIII. Two pairs of gonopores also observed with SEM (Fig. 3d, e).

Distribution and habitat

Cherokee Road Extension Blue Hole “Magical Sinkhole,” Abaco Island, Bahamas. Inland anchialine blue hole with depths over 100 m. Halocline at 15–20 m with strong hydrogen sulfide layer (Gonzalez et al. 2011).

Remarks

Speleonerilla calypso sp. n. differs from S. saltatrix (Worsaae et al. 2004; Worsaae and Müller 2004) in the presence of one additional pair of nephridia opening on segment V, rudimental cirri on segment I, and more abundant and longer neurochaetae (Table 3). This species most closely resembles S. salsa sp. n. but differs by a longer maximum length, presence of rudimental cirri on segment I, and slightly more and longer chaetae. Genetic distances to the other species of the genus are summarized in Table 4.

Speleonerilla salsa sp. n.

Figures 4, 5, and 6; Tables 1, 2, 3, and 4

Fig. 4
figure 4

Speleonerilla salsa sp. n. Light microscopy images of a live specimen with one palp; b whole specimen (both palps lost) in ventral view; c detail of prostomium with two lateral antennae; d segments V–VIII with egg; e maximum intensity projection of CLSM image stack showing segmentally arranged nephridia, oviducts, and spermioducts in ventrolateral view (pink—acetylated α-tubulin-like immunoreactivity, cyan—DAPI). bl, chaetal blade; cs, chaetal shaft; eg, egg; es, extension shaft; la, lateral antenna; ne1–3, segmental nephridia; od, oviduct; pa, palp; pc, parapodial cirri; pl, pydigial lobe; pr, prostomium; sd, spermioduct; I–VIII, segments I–VIII

Fig. 5
figure 5

Speleonerilla salsa sp. n. Scanning electron micrographs of a whole specimen (both palps lost) in ventral view; b whole specimen in lateral view (dorsal side up); c prostomium with palp in lateral view; d closer view of palp; e dorsal view of prosotomium and nuchal organs. an, anterior field of sensory cilia; ch, chaetae; la, lateral antenna; lc, prostomial lateral ciliation; ma, median antenna; mo, mouth; nec, neurochaetae (chaetal holes, since chaetae are missing); nl, neuropodial chaetal lobe; no, nuchal organs; noc, notopodial chaetae (chaetal holes, since chaetae are missing); pa, palps; pc, parapodial cirrus; pl, pydigial lobe; po, posterior field of sensory cilia; pr, prostomium; vb, ventral ciliary band; vt, ventral ciliary tufts; I–VIII, segments I–VIII

Fig. 6
figure 6

Speleonerilla salsa sp. n. Scanning electron micrographs of a prostomium in ventrolateral view; b detail of segment II with neuropodial chaetal lobe in lateral view; c detail of pygidium with pygidial lobes and scars from pygidial cirrus, posterior view; d detail of chaetae with shaft, extension of shaft, and blade; e closer view of chaetal blade. bl, chaetal blade; cl, chaetal lobe; cs, chaetal shaft; ct, cilary tufts; es, extension shaft; nec, neurochaetae (chaetal holes, since chaetae are missing); nl, neuropodial chaetal lobe; no, nuchal organs; noc, notopodial chaetae (chaetal holes, since chaetae are missing); pl, pydigial lobe; pr, prostomium; py, pygidial cirrus; vb, ventral ciliary band; I–VIII, segments I–VIII

Type material

Holotype (NHMD-218173) on SEM stub, 411 μm long, Casimba El Brinco, Cuba, water column, 20–30 m, 22.076/− 81.056, November 2014 (Coll. A. Martínez & B.C. Gonzalez). Paratypes: three specimens (NHMD-218174) on the same SEM stub as holotype, and eight specimens as whole mounts (in glycerol) (NHMD-218175–NHMD-218182), the same collecting trip as holotype. One specimen lost in the process. ZooBank number: urn:lsid:zoobank.org: act:33B37943-4F2F-44C6-A545-8DC97980E52E.

Diagnosis

Speleonerilla with eight segments. Parapodium with up to 13 compound chaetae per fascicle. Parapodial interramal cirri on segments III–VIII. No rudimental cirri on segment I. Neuropodial chaetal lobes from segments I–VIII. Three pairs of segmental nephridia opening in segments III, IV, and V. Hermaphroditic with one pair of spermioducts opening in segment VII, and one pair of oviducts in segment VIII.

Etymology

The species is named after the dance salsa, the musical roots of which lie in Eastern Cuba.

Description

All measurements from holotype, numbers given in parentheses from paratypes. Most measurements taken from SEM preparations (see Table 2). Body with eight chaetigerous segments (Figs. 4a and 5a, b), 411 μm long (411–733 μm, n = 12), 158 μm wide including parapodia (125–221 μm, n = 12), 117 μm excluding parapodia (116–121 μm, n = 4). Segments I–IV longest, segments V–VIII decreasing in length posteriorly, pygidium shortest, 28 μm (8–29 μm, n = 11).

Prostomium short and rounded (Figs. 4a and 5e), 36 μm long (33–76 μm, n = 10), 47 μm wide (47–130 μm, n = 10), with two thread-like ventrolateral palps (Fig. 5c) and three short antennae (Figs. 4a, b and 5e). Palps, maximum 373 μm long (absent on holotype; n = 1); lateral antennae, maximum 30 μm long (21–39 μm, n = 7), median antenna, broken in holotype (17–18 μm, n = 2). Eyes absent. Nuchal organs appear as round elevated bulges on each lateral side of prostomium, situated between palps and parapodia of segment I (Figs. 5e and 6a).

Parapodia on segment I, uniramous (15–41 μm, n = 8, measurements from paratypes only), parapodia on segments II–VIII, biramous, 24 μm long (14–34 μm, n = 7). Interramal parapodial cirri on segments III–VIII (Fig. 5a), maximum 48 μm long (34–64 μm, n = 7); parapodial cirri cylindrical and slightly increasing in length toward pygidium (Fig. 5a, b). Neuropodial chaetal lobe on segments I–VIII (Figs. 5b and 6a).

Pygidium short, with two relatively long pygidial lobes (Figs. 4a, 5a, b, and 6b, c), 48 μm long (19–48 μm, n = 7), each with two projections and dense ciliation (Fig. 6b, c). Pygidial cirri not observed, scars visible with SEM (Fig. 6c).

All chaetae compound, straight (Figs. 5b and 6d); shafts with small pointed distal extension (Fig. 6d), 3 μm (2–4 μm, n = 4). Alternating pocket-like structure projecting outwards along shaft margins. Blades without ornamentation (Fig. 6e). Segment I with up to 13 chaetae per fascicle (n = 2); segments II–VIII with ventral fascicles of up to 13 neuropodial chaetae (n = 2) and dorsal fascicle with up to 10 notochaetae (n = 2). Shaft maximum 86 μm long (70–105 μm, n = 6), blade maximum 26 μm long (15–34 μm, n = 5); total length maximum 122 μm (59–184 μm, n = 9).

'Prostomial ciliation comprise two ciliated areas, anterior and posterior to median antenna, respectively, consisting of individual cilia, and paired lateral ciliary bands extending from each lateral antenna to the insertion of the palps (Fig. 5e).

Palps with ventral and frontal longitudinal bands extending from the insertion to the tip of the palp (Fig. 5c). Palp ventral ciliary band consists of tufts of more than 50 cilia, up to 17 μm long (not observed in holotype; n = 1) and spaced ca. 17 μm apart (Fig. 5c, d). Palp frontal ciliary band consists of individually arranged, presumably sensory, cilia. Few individual cilia are found scattered between both bands (Fig. 5d).

Dorsal transverse rows of up to four ciliary tufts across segments II–VIII at the level of the parapodia; each tuft with more than 50 motile cilia. Ventral body surface with dense ciliation, consisting of mouth ciliation, a midventral ciliary band extending to dorsal anus on pygidium (Fig. 6c), and transverse rows of four–eight ciliary tufts at the level of parapodia (see Table 2). A single additional ventral ciliary tuft present between prostomium and segment I and between segments I and II, on each ventrolateral side (Fig. 6a).

Hermaphroditic. Nephridia and gonoducts investigated using CLSM (Fig. 4d). Three pairs of segmental nephridia running dorsoventrally, parallel to ventral nerve cord, nephridiopores opening ventrally in segments III, IV, and V near segment borders. Enteronephridia not observed. One pair of spermioducts, relatively straight, opening in segment VII; one pair of gonoducts opening in segment VIII.

Distribution and habitat

Casimba El Brinco, Ciénaga de Zapata, Matanzas, South Cuba. Anchialine limestone cave, with a halocline at 5–8 m depth and a total depth of 80 m.

Remarks

Speleonerilla salsa sp. n. differs from S. saltatrix in having one additional pair of nephridia opening in segment V and more and longer neurochaetae (Table 3). It most closely resembles S. calypso sp. n. but differs by a shorter maximum length, absence of rudimental cirri on segment I, and by having fewer, shorter chaetae. Genetic distances to the other species of the genus are summarized in Table 4.

Speleonerilla isa sp. n.

Figures 7, 8, and 9; Tables 1, 2, 3, and 4

Type material

Fig. 7
figure 7

Speleonerilla isa sp. n. Light microscopy images of a whole specimen with both palps in dorsal view; b prostomium and segment I with nuchal organs and rudimental cirri; c detail of interramal parapodial cirrus on segment IV; d maximum intensity projection of CLSM image stack showing segmentally arranged nephridia, oviducts, and spermioducts in ventrolateral view (pink—acetylated α-tubulin-like immunoreactivity, cyan—DAPI). ch, chaetae; gc, glandular cells; ne1–3, segmental nephridia; no, nuchal organs; od, oviduct; pa, palps; pc, parapodial cirrus; pl, pygidial lobe; pr, prostomium; rc, rudimental cirrus; sd1–2, spermioduct; vb, ventral ciliary band; I–XI, segments I–IX

Fig. 8
figure 8

Speleonerilla isa sp. n. Scanning electron micrographs of a whole specimen (both palps lost) in dorsal view; b prostomium with scars from lateral and median antennae, antero-dorsal view; c anterior view of prostomium showing anterior field of sensory cilia (as); d mapping of as; e prostomium and segments I–III in lateral view; f segments I–III in lateral view; g segment I with rudimental cirrus in ventral view. an, anterior field of sensory cilia; ch, chaetae; ct, ciliary tufts; la, lateral antenna; lc, prostomial lateral ciliation; ma, median antenna; no, nuchal organs; pa, palps; pc, parapodial cirri; pl, pydigial lobe; po, posterior field of sensory cilia; pr, prostomium; rc, rudimental cirri; I–XI, segments I–IX

Fig. 9
figure 9

Speleonerilla isa sp. n. Scanning electron micrographs of a ciliary tufts on segments VI–VII in dorsal view; b segments VIII–IX in dorsal view; c chaetae with shaft, extension of shaft, and blade. bl, chaetal blade; cs, chaetal shaft; ct, cilary tufts; es, extension shaft; pl, pydigial lobe; VI–XI, segments VI–IX

Holotype (NHMD-218167) on SEM stub, 391 μm long, Túnel de la Atlántida, Lanzarote, water column, 2–20 m, 29.157051/− 13.430459, October 2011 (Coll. A. Martínez, E. Domínguez, L. E. Cañadas, B. C. Gonzalez, K. Worsaae). Paratypes: five specimens as permanent whole mounts (in glycerol, NHMD-218168–NHMD-218172)), the same collecting site as holotype, collected October 2011 and April 2014 (Coll. A. Martínez, E. Domínguez, L. E. Cañadas, B. C. Gonzalez, K. Worsaae). ZooBank number: urn:lsid:zoobank.org: act:DAE63780-D1B2-4EF3-8F38-1CED31ADEFB7.

Diagnosis

Speleonerilla with nine segments. Parapodia with up to 12 compound chaetae in each fascicle. Parapodia on segments II–IX, well-developed and biramous, up to 11 compound chaetae per fascicle. Rudimental cirri present on segment I, parapodial cirri from segments II–IX. Neuropodial chaetal lobes from segments IV–IX. Pygidium with densely ciliated, paired pygidial lobes and long filiform pygidial cirri. Dorsal transverse rows of up to six tufts per segment. Three pairs of nephridia opening in segments III, IV, and V. Hermaphroditic with two pairs of long, angled spermioducts opening in segments VI and VII, and one pair of oviducts opening in segment VIII. All gonopores placed ventromedian (rather than ventrolateral).

Etymology

The species is named after the Canarian traditional folk dance “isa” from Lanzarote.

Description

All measurements from holotype, numbers given in parentheses from paratypes. Most measurements taken from SEM preparations (see Table 2). Body with nine chaetigerous segments (Figs. 7a and 8a), 391 μm long (329–580 μm, n = 6), 109 μm wide including parapodia (109–186 μm, n = 6), 73 μm wide excluding parapodia (73–140 μm, n = 5). Segment decreasing in length posteriorly, pygidium shortest, 24 μm (24–28 μm, n = 2).

Prostomium short and rounded (Fig. 7a, b), 40 μm long (26–50 μm, n = 4), 55 μm wide (37–64 μm, n = 4), with two thread-like ventrolateral palps and three short antennae. Palps maximum 253 μm long (229–380 μm, n = 3) (Fig. 7a); lateral antennae maximum 46 μm long (absent in holotype; n = 1), median antenna 55 μm (absent in holotype; n = 1) (Fig. 8a, b). Eyes absent. Nuchal organs paired, appear as a round elevated bulge on each lateral side of prostomium, between palps and parapodia of segment I (Fig. 8a).

Parapodia on segment I, uniramous, 19 μm long (19–23 μm, n = 2), parapodia on segments II–IX, maximum 18 μm long (14–27 μm, n = 4). Rudimental parapodial cirri on segment I (Fig. 8a, e–g), 7 μm (7–8 μm, n = 2). Interramal parapodial cirri on segments II–IX maximum 43 μm long (21–92 μm, n = 4); parapodial cirri cylindrical and slightly increasing in length toward pygidium (Fig. 8a). Parapodial cirri with glandular oval cells throughout (Fig. 7c). Neuropodial chaetal lobe, segments IV–IX.

Pygidium short, with two pygidial lobes (Fig. 7a), 11 μm long (11–17 μm, n = 4), each with two projections and dense ciliation. Long filiform pygidial cirri observed on live specimen, scars visible with SEM.

All chaetae compound, straight (Fig. 8a); shaft with small pointed distal extension (Fig. 9c), 3 μm (n = 2). Alternating pocket-like structures projecting outwards along shaft margins. Blades lacking ornamentation. Segment I with maximum 12 chaetae per fascicle (n = 3); segments II–IX, each with dorsal and ventral fascicles of maximum 11 and 9 chaetae (n = 1). Shaft maximum 113 μm long (84–113 μm, n = 3), blade maximum 20 μm long (20–36 μm, n = 3); total length maximum 122 μm (120–131 μm, n = 4).

Prostomium with paired lateral ciliary bands extending from each lateral antenna to insertion of palps. Prostomial anterior field of sensory cilia with transverse row of individual sensory cilia, dorsal to lateral antennae, and a secondary curved row above them (Fig. 8c, d). Prostomial posterior field of sensory cilia posterior of median antenna with several individual cilia (Fig. 8b–d). Two lateral ciliary tufts present on each lateral side of prostomium (Fig. 8b).

Palps with ventral and frontal longitudinal bands extending from insertion to tip of palp. Palp ventral ciliary band consists of tufts of more than 30 cilia, up to 9 μm long (not observed in holotype; n = 1). Palp frontal ciliary band consists of individually arranged, presumably sensory cilia. Few individual cilia are found scattered between both bands.

Dorsal transverse rows at the level of parapodia, each with up to six ciliary tufts (see Table 2) (Fig. 9a); each tuft with more than 50 motile cilia. Ventral mouth area heavily ciliated, continuing into narrow midventral ciliary band, extending to anus, and dorsally atop pygidium (Figs. 8a and 9b). Ventral rows of up to eight ciliary tufts, aligned with parapodia (Fig. 8f). A single additional ciliary tuft present on each ventrolateral side, between prostomium and segment I (not shown) and between segments I and II (Fig. 8g).

Hermaphroditic. Nephridia and gonoducts investigated using CLSM (Fig. 7d). Three pairs of segmental nephridia, running dorsoventrally, parallel to ventral nerve cord, opening ventrally on segments III, IV, and V. Enteronephridia not observed. Two pairs of spermioducts and one pair of oviducts, initiating dorsally, perpendicular to ventral nerve cord, bending 110° toward ventral midline, where they open on segments VI, VII, and VIII.

Distribution and habitat

Túnel de la Atlántida, La Corona lava tube, Lanzarote, Canary Islands. Lava tube with no conspicuous halocline, 2–15 m deep, almost no sediment. Mainly collected at entrance pool of Túnel de la Atlántida (Martínez et al. 2016).

Remarks

Speleonerilla isa sp. n. differs markedly from the Caribbean species of Speleonerilla by having nine segments (versus eight), two pairs (versus one) of spermioducts that open in a common midventral opening (versus two separate ventrolateral openings), and parapodial cirri present on all segments (see Table 3). Genetic distances to the other species of the genus are summarized in Table 4.

Phylogenetic analyses

Maximum likelihood and Bayesian analyses of our four concatenated markers (Table 1) yielded identical topologies but with varying maximum likelihood bootstrap values (MLB) and Bayesian posterior probabilities (BPP) (Fig. 10). A monophyletic clade including all species of Speleonerilla was recovered in both analyses but not with full support (BPP/MLB: 0.84/99). The geographically distant S. isa was found to branch off next to a fully supported clade with the remaining species of Speleonerilla. The internal relationships of the Caribbean and Bermudian species are poorly supported, except for the fully supported nesting of the south Cuban species, S. salsa with S. saltatrix from Bermuda.

Fig. 10
figure 10

Phylogenetic relationships of Speleonerilla spp. Tree topology based on concatenated gene dataset of four markers (COI, 18S, 28S, H3). Tree topologies were similar between maximum likelihood and Bayesian analyses. Only nodal support of Bayesian posterior probabilities (BPP) ≥ 0.5 and maximum likelihood bootstrap (MLB) ≥ 50 are presented. Nodes not recovered or with low support are represented by a dash (-). Asterisks (*) denote BPP = 1.0 and MLB = 100. Summary of the species and genes included in this phylogeny are listed in Table 1. Drawing of Speleonerilla saltatrix (Worsaae et al. 2004), scale bar 100 μm

Discussion

Morphological features of Speleonerilla

All new species of Speleonerilla possess similar, extremely long flexible palps and ciliated lobular projections of the pygidium, such as described for S. saltatrix, hereof established to represent unique synapomorphies of all members of the genus. It seems unlikely that the pygidial lobes are modifications of the last segment or pygidial cirri (Worsaae et al. 2004), since they are also present in S. isa having nine segments and the easily shed pygidial cirri (or scars hereof) are now found in all new species in addition to the pygidial lobes. We also observed morphological and genetic differences, distinguishing them from S. saltatrix. Speleonerilla isa from La Corona lava tube in Lanzarote deviates the most, as it possesses nine segments and two pairs of spermioducts (with midventral openings) and it was consistently recovered as sister group of the remaining Speleonerilla. This phylogenetic position and multiple morphological differences could justify the placement of S. isa in a different genus. However, we preferred to keep it within Speleonerilla in order to avoid the description of a monotypic genus, which otherwise would present several of the same unique features (e.g., palps, lobes) characterizing Speleonerilla.

Secondary adaptations to suspension feeding

The presence of long ciliated palps, a body with transverse rows of ciliary tufts, and ciliated pygidial lobes facilitate swimming and suspension-feeding behavior in all species of the genus. In vitro observations of live S. saltatrix collected with plankton nets in the shallow, small entrance pool of Roadside Cave, Bermuda, revealed exceptional swimming skills compared to other nerillids (Worsaae et al. 2004, 2009) and indicated a semi- or fully swimming (holopelagic) lifestyle. Subsequent cave diving collecting of the here described additional species from larger water bodies with further distances to the bottom confirms that species of Speleonerilla are fully specialized to live up in the water column of anchialine caves, sometimes near the halocline. This grants access to the detritus and bacteria carried by tidal currents or caught within the haloclines of anchialine caves. The here presented collections in Northeast Cuba and the Yucatán Peninsula of México revealed Speleonerilla sp. A and Speleonerilla sp. B to be found both below and above the halocline in salinities down to 5 and 0‰, respectively (Worsaae, pers. obs). This indicates a further adaptive ability of Speleonerilla to cope with fast and drastically changing salinities (from 5 to 35‰ over short distances).

Colonization of the water column in anchialine systems

Species of Speleonerilla described herein have been collected from caves with very different morphology, geological age, history, and hydrology (Iliffe and Bishop 2009), although they are all being categorized as anchialine (Stock et al. 1986). The mid-Atlantic island of Bermuda sits atop an extinct Meso-Cenozoic seamount capped with Pleistocene limestone (Coates et al. 2013). The broad flat-topped platforms of the Bahamas archipelago, Cuba, and Yucatán Peninsula consist of thick layers of shallow water carbonates overlying crust associated with the opening of the North Atlantic basin in the Middle Jurassic (Williams et al. 1988; Bauer-Gottwein et al. 2011). Bermudian and Caribbean caves are near to the coast in Pleistocene age limestone. Coincidently, all four of these localities have well-developed brackish and saltwater layers separated by a halocline, where organic matter accumulates favoring the growth of chemoautotrophic bacteria that provides food into the system. In contrast, the Lanzarote lava tube is of geologically recent and strictly volcanic in origin, with the cave lacking significant amounts of fresh or brackish water and exhibiting only a slight drop in salinity related to the tidal cycle (Wilkens et al. 2009). Despite of the lack of haloclines, the high porosity of the surrounding volcanic material and strong tidal currents favor the flow of suspended organic matter, preventing its deposition. In spite of the differences, the hydrology in all of these investigated cave systems supports a constant supply of suspended food sources, making the water column a more generous food niche than the nutrient-poor sediment layers (Pohlman et al. 1997; Iliffe et al. 2000; Martínez et al. 2016, 2017; Brankovits et al. 2017), which may be the driving force behind the radical evolutionary changes of the Speleonerilla morphology compared to other nerillids.

Other lineages of suspension-feeding animals have colonized the water column of the lava tube, including various groups of copepods, ostracods, amphipods, and thermosbaenaceans (Martínez et al. 2016). Among annelids, secondary adaptations toward swimming and suspension feeding are also found in the protodrilid Megadrilus pelagicus Martínez et al. 2017, endemic from Lanzarote and belonging to an otherwise interstitial genus (Martínez et al. 2015). Live observations of this species in aquaria and from inside the cave revealed them drifting in the water column upheld by the antiplectic metachronal beating of specialized ciliary bands (Martínez et al. 2017). Likewise, several macrofaunal cave annelids belonging to benthic marine lineages have also evolved swimming capabilities using muscular movements, e.g., the presumed suspension feeder Speleobregma lanzaroteum Bertelsen, 1986 of the family Scalibregmatidae (Martínez et al. 2012, 2013). The presence of all these suspension-feeding annelids possibly favors pelagicism of otherwise benthic, predatory species, such as the scale worms Pelagomacellicephala and Gesiella (Gonzalez et al. 2017, 2018a, b).

Diversification of the genus Speleonerilla

In the present study, members of Speleonerilla have been found at both sides of the Atlantic. The only species discovered in the East Atlantic, S. isa, was recovered as sister branch to the West Atlantic clade. This relationship is congruent with the morphological differences found between S. isa and the Caribbean clade. Many animal lineages exclusive from anchialine caves show similar disjunct distribution patterns to Speleonerilla, with representatives at both sides of the Atlantic and the Indo-Pacific (e.g., remipedes, thermosbaenaceans, leptanthurid isopods, atyids of the so-called TST clade, and thaumatociprid ostracods; Kornicker and Iliffe 1998; Koenemann et al. 2007; Koenemann et al. 2009; Page et al. 2018; Jurado-Rivera et al. 2017). The extremely disjunct distribution patterns of these taxa have been proposed to be a consequence of cave colonization during the Mesozoic, followed by vicariance (e.g., Stock 1981; Iliffe et al. 1984; Notenboom 1991; Humphreys 1993; Holsinger 1994; Koenemann and Holsinger 1999). However, the presence of several stygobites in geologically recent caves, such as Lanzarote, Christmas Island, or Bermuda (Sket and Iliffe 1980; Iliffe et al. 1983, 1984; Brankovits et al. 2017), and recent phylogenetic analyses (Botello et al. 2013; Jurado-Rivera et al. 2017) imply that dispersal may also have been involved. The deep sea has been classically suggested as a migratory pathway, as many of these cave-exclusive lineages exhibit deep-sea affinities (Hart et al. 1985; Gonzalez et al. 2017, 2018b), or alternatively larval dispersal throughout the open ocean may have been involved (Kano and Kase 2004; Jurado-Rivera et al. 2017). Without a molecular clock, our topology of Speleonerilla could be explained by any of these evolutionary scenarios, or a combination thereof.

The relationships among the West Atlantic species of Speleonerilla are poorly resolved, and the few resolved nodes do not reflect the geographical distances. Although this may be due to the lack of resolution of the markers, these markers seem appropriate to resolve the relationships among the remaining genera and species of Nerillidae (Worsaae and Martínez, unpublished). This suggest that either the lack of sampling in the Caribbean and Bermuda area and/or a rapid diversification process connected to the colonization of caves is reducing the resolution of our analyses, warranting further research throughout the Caribbean.