Abstract
Background
The liver manifestations of Alagille syndrome (ALGS) are highly variable, and factors affecting its prognosis are poorly understood. We asked whether the composition of bile acids in ALGS patients with good clinical outcomes differs from that in patients with poor outcomes and whether bile acids could be used as prognostic biomarkers.
Methods
Blood for bile acid profiling was collected from genetically confirmed JAG1-associated ALGS patients before one year of age. A good prognosis was defined as survival with native liver and total bilirubin (TB) < 85.5 μmol/L, while a poor prognosis was defined as either liver transplantation, death from liver failure, or TB ≥ 85.5 μmol/L at the last follow-up.
Results
We found that the concentrations of two poly-hydroxylated bile acids, tauro‐2β,3α,7α,12α-tetrahydroxylated bile acid (THBA) and glyco-hyocholic acid (GHCA), were significantly increased in patients with good prognosis compared to those with poor prognosis [area under curve (AUC) = 0.836 and 0.782, respectively] in the discovery cohort. The same trend was also observed in the molar ratios of GHCA to glyco- chenodeoxycholic acid (GCDCA) and tetrahydroxylated bile acid (THCA) to tauro-chenodeoxycholic acid (TCDCA) (both AUC = 0.836). A validation cohort confirmed these findings. Notably, tauro‐2β,3α,7α,12α-THBA achieved the highest prediction accuracy of 88.00% (92.31% sensitivity and 83.33% specificity); GHCA at > 607.69 nmol/L was associated with native liver survival [hazard ratio: 13.03, 95% confidence interval (CI): (2.662–63.753), P = 0.002].
Conclusions
We identified two poly-hydroxylated bile acids as liver prognostic biomarkers of ALGS patients. Enhanced hydroxylation of bile acids may result in better clinical outcomes.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Alagille syndrome (ALGS, OMIM 118,450) is a multisystem autosomal dominant developmental disorder that is caused by pathogenic variants in either Jagged 1 (JAG1) or NOTCH2, with JAG1 variants accounting for approximately 95% of diagnosed cases [1,2,3,4,5]. It potentially leads to end-stage liver diseases requiring liver transplantation [6]. The poor prognosis of ALGS poses a substantial burden on clinical management, as well as on families and society economically and emotionally.
With highly variable clinical manifestations and outcomes and the lack of obvious correlation between genotype and phenotype [2], potential biomarkers indicating the liver prognosis of ALGS are urgently needed [7]. Previously, Kamath et al. reported that in some cases of ALGS, total bilirubin levels fell rapidly between 12 and 24 months of age, and the decrease may be associated with better outcomes [8]. However, to our knowledge, earlier (before one-year-old age) prognostic biomarkers that are important for the precision management of ALGS have not been reported to date.
Bile acids are amphipathic molecules essential for multiple physiological functions, such as lipid and energy homeostasis [9, 10]. However, hydrophobic bile acids at high concentrations are inherently cytotoxic and can induce inflammatory stress in the liver or intestines [11,12,13]. Hydroxylation and conjugation through amidation with glycine and taurine or esterification with sulfuric acids and glucuronic acids increase their hydrophilicity, representing two efficient mechanisms of bile acid detoxification [14, 15]. The compositions and relative hydrophobicity of different bile acids in biological materials can be analyzed by ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography coupled to multiple-reaction monitoring–mass spectrometry (UPLC-MRM-MS) [16].
Hydroxylation can increase hydrophilicity and decrease the toxicity of bile acids. Poly-hydroxylated bile acids, such as trihydrocylated, including muricholic acids (MCA) and hyocholic acid (HCA), or tetrahydroxy bile acid (THBA), are highly hydrophilic bile acids compared to human primary bile acid, chenodeoxycholic acid. Glyco-hyocholic bile acid (GHCA), glycine-conjugated HCA, is decreased in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and associated with disease severity [17]. In biliary stenosis, GHCA was decreased in malignant stenosis compared to benign stenosis and controls [18]. No report on GHCA in cholestatic disorders has yet been published.
THBAs are usually not detectable or are only present in trace amounts in healthy humans, but they are often detected in the serum and urine of cholestatic patients and mouse models. It has been speculated that THBA may act as a hepatoprotective agent in alleviating cholestatic stress [19,20,21,22,23]. In 2001, Wang et al. reported the presence of a large amount of THBAs in Bsep−/− mice, which displayed only very mild cholestasis in contrast to human BSEP (ABCB11) deficiency that results in fatal childhood disease, i.e., progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis type 2 (PFIC 2). THBAs are proposed to protect mutant mice from severe cholestatic damage [24]. A follow-up study of Mdr 2−/− and Bsep−/− double knockout mice showed that increased hydrophilic bile acids, such as MCA, THBAs, and reduced cholic acid, prevented liver damage caused by the Mdr2−/− genotype, which typically presented with progressive liver damage due to severe cholangitis [25]. In a preliminary study in infants with intrahepatic cholestasis of mixed etiologies, a high level of THBAs in urine was observed to be associated with good clinical outcomes [21]. In a more focused study of cholestasis patients, in comparison with 35 healthy controls, some THBAs and tauro-THBAs were found to be elevated along with significantly reduced hydrophobicity of the bile acid pools in plasma of PFIC 2 and genetically undiagnosed cholestasis patients [20]. In a follow-up study of a subset of PFIC 2 patients who underwent partial internal biliary diversion, Liu et al. observed that changes in the level of THBAs were well correlated with disease relief and recurrence, which implies a potential use for poly-hydroxylated bile acids as prognostic indicators [26].
Since bile acids play a key role in cholestatic diseases, we aimed to investigate in the present study whether poly-hydroxylated bile acids could be potential liver prognostic biomarkers of ALGS outcomes.
Methods
Study design
Serum or plasma samples for bile acid profiling were clinical specimens collected from genetically confirmed JAG1-associated ALGS patients before one year of age. These specimens were the leftover samples from clinical tests, which were deposited in biobanks in Jinshan Hospital (Shanghai, China) and Children's Hospital of Fudan University (Shanghai, China) according to ethics approvals (No. 2014-13-01 in Jinshan Hospital and No. 2015-178 in Children's Hospital of Fudan University). The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Children’s Hospital of Fudan University (Shanghai, China) (No. 2017-99) following the ethical standards of the Helsinki Declaration of 1964, as revised in 2000. Informed consent to participate in the study was obtained from participants or their parent or legal guardian in the case of children under 16 years old. The selection of patients and samples is outlined in Fig. 1. If one patient had more than one specimen collected before the age of one year, the earliest specimen was used. Samples collected from 01 January 2015 to 30 December 2017 were enrolled as the discovery cohort, and those collected from 01 January 2018 to 31 October 2020 were enrolled as the validation cohort.
Subjects and grouping
The clinical diagnosis of ALGS was made by standard clinical criteria [3]: the presence of bile duct paucity and at least three major clinical features or at least four of six major clinical features (cholestasis, cardiac murmur, skeletal abnormalities, ocular abnormalities, a characteristic face, and renal abnormalities) in the absence of paucity of bile ducts. Only patients with confirmed JAG1 pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants were enrolled in this study. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) received the Kasai procedure; (2) patients who were alive with their native liver and less than one year old in the last follow-up or lost to follow-up before the age of one year, and (3) samples that were not available in the biobank. All patients received standard medical care, including ursodeoxycholic acid, supplementation with fat-soluble vitamins, and cholestyramine if needed.
The patient's prognosis was assessed according to both clinical data and liver function tests at the last follow-up, which were collected from the medical electronic record system or the parents of the patients. A good prognosis was defined as patients satisfying both of the following criteria: (1) survival with their native liver, and (2) total bilirubin (TB) < 85.5 μmol/L. Poor prognosis was defined if either of the following events occurred: (1) received liver transplantation or died of liver failure [27], and (2) TB ≥ 85.5 μmol/L.
According to the above criteria, 21 ALGS patients with JAG1 mutations were enrolled in the discovery cohort. Among them, 11 were grouped as having a good prognosis, including six patients without jaundice and five with mild jaundice at the last follow-up. They were sampled at a median age of 7.8 months with an interquartile of 6.1 months to 10.7 months. The last follow-up was at a median age of three years four months (interquartile one year 10 months to five years five months). The other 10 were grouped as poor prognosis, including two who died before one-year-old, five received liver transplantation at ages of one year five months to two years seven months, and three lived with severe jaundice with the last follow-up at ages four years five months, three years 10 months, and six years two months, respectively. They were sampled at a median age of 7.9 months (interquartile 5.8 months to 11.25 months).
Totally 25 ALGS patients were enrolled in the validation cohort. Among them, 12 were grouped as having a good prognosis with a median sampling age of 4.5 months (interquartile 3.8 months to 4.6 months). Among them, nine patients lived without jaundice, and three lived with mild jaundice at the last follow-up, with a median age of two years seven months and an interquartile range of two years three months to four years. Thirteen were grouped as poor prognosis with a median sampling age at 6.4 months (interquartile 5.2 months to 9.5 months), among which 10 lived with severe jaundice after follow-up to a median age of three years and interquartile two years to four years nine months, one received liver transplantation at six months of age, and two died at the ages of nine months and two years 10 months. The demographic data and follow-up details of these patients are presented in Supplementary Table 1.
Sample collection and specimen preparation
Plasma from ALGS patients in the discovery cohort was separated from EDTA‐treated peripheral blood by centrifugation, and serum was collected. The samples were aliquoted, lyophilized, and stored at – 80 °C until bile acid analysis. The samples of the validation cohort were from frozen plasma or serum deposited in the biobanks.
Bile acid analysis
Bile acid analysis was performed by ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography coupled to multiple-monitoring reaction-mass spectrometry (UPLC/MRM‐MS) according to the procedures as well as LC and MS operating parameters as previously described [16]. Briefly, bile acids in plasma or serum were extracted with a mixture of methanol/acetonitrile (1:1, v/v), followed by cleanup and enrichment by reversed-phase solid-phase extraction with the use of polymeric Strata-X cartridges (33 µm, 60 mg/1 mL, Phenomenx Inc. CA). Reversed-phase (C18) UPLC/MRM‐MS with negative ion detection was used to separate and quantitate bile acids in the samples of the discovery cohort, which was carried out at the University of Victoria‐Genome British Columbia Proteomics Centre. Quantitation of bile acids in the samples of the validation cohort was performed at the Institutes of Biomedical Sciences of Fudan University. In total, 83 bile acids, including primary BAs [cholic acid, (CA); chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA)] and secondary BAs [deoxycholic acid (DCA); lithocholic acid (LCA); ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA)], and their metabolites in the classes of unconjugated, glycine-conjugated (glyco-), taurine-conjugated (tauro-), sulfated and glucuronidated BAs, together with a few keto-/diketo-BAs, unconjugated and taurine-conjugated THBAs, were quantified, with the use of their standard substances for the preparation of linearly regressed, internal standard calibration curves. Totally 14 deuterium-labeled bile acids were used as internal standards for accurate quantitation. For the BAs for which none of their isotope-labeling internal standards were available, glyco-CDCA-d4 was used as a common internal standard.
Total bile acids (TBA) are the sum of all detected bile acids. The total sulfated, and glyco- and tauro-bile acids were calculated by adding the concentrations of the corresponding conjugated forms in each category. For example, concentrations of CA 3-sulfate, DCA 3-sulfate, CDCA 3-sulfate, and LCA 3-sulfate were summed as the total of bile acid sulfates. The concentrations of unconjugated and conjugated CA and CDCA and those of unconjugated and conjugated DCA and LCA were summed as the total of primary and secondary bile acids, respectively. The percentages of individual BAs among the total of its category, the molar ratio of secondary BAs to primary BAs, and the molar ratio of total tauro-BAs to total glyco-BAs were also calculated. The molar ratios of conjugated to corresponding unconjugated BAs were used to reflect the specific metabolism processes, including hydroxylation [(GHCA:glyco- chenodeoxycholic acid (GCDCA) and tauro-hyocholic acid (THCA):tauro-chenodeoxycholic acid (TCDCA)], glyco-conjugation [glyco-cholic acid (GCA):CA, GCDCA:CDCA, glycol-ursodeoxycholic acid (GUDCA):UDCA, etc.], tauro-conjugation [tauro-cholic acid (TCA):CA, TCDCA: CDCA, tauro-ursodeoxycholic acid (TUDCA):UDCA, etc.], sulfonation [cholic acid-sulfate (CAS):CA, chenodeoxycholic acid-sulfate (CDCAS):CDCA, lithocholic acid-sulfate (LCAS):LCA, etc.], glucuronidation (CDCA-glu:CDCA), carbon shortening from C24 to C23 BAs (nor-CA:CA, nor-UDCA:UDCA, nor-THBA:THBA) and oxide reduction (7-keto-LCA:LCA) [20].
Statistical analysis
Median and interquartile range (IQR) for quantitative indexes are presented. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to determine the difference in the indexes between the two groups. Prognostic biomarkers were selected via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Youden's index was used to define the optimal cut-off value. Fisher’s exact test was used to test the predicted efficacy of biomarkers in the validation cohort. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was conducted to determine whether bile acids were independently associated with native liver survival. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to display survival curves. Graphs were generated using GraphPad Prism (version 8.0, GraphPad Software Inc.). Statistical significance was considered at P < 0.05 bilaterally.
Results
Bile acid profiles in the discovery cohort
The concentrations of individual bile acids in the good prognosis versus poor prognosis patients in the discovery cohort are presented in Table 1. Totally 83 bile acids were analyzed for each patient. GHCA in the good prognosis group showed higher concentrations than that in the poor prognosis group (median and IQR: 1168.03 nmol/L, 692.83–1863.72 nmol/L vs. 557.90 nmol/L, 339.18–1002.53 nmol/L, P = 0.036), and a similar trend was found in tauro‐2β,3α,7α,12α-THBA (91.73 nmol/L, IQR: 52.07–298.87 nmol/L vs. 51.60 nmol/L, IQR: 34.72–69.77 nmol/L, P = 0.013). Other polyhydroxylated bile acids, such as THCA (P = 0.099), tauro-3α,6α,7α,12α-THBA (P = 0.061), and tauro-3α,6β,7α,12α-THBA (P = 0.099), also showed trends similar to those of GHCA and tauro‐2β,3α,7α,12α-THBA, with borderline significance. No significant difference was observed in the concentrations of other bile acids except 3-oxo-CA.
To explore the overall metabolic process of bile acids, the concentrations of individual bile acids were summed according to their different categories (Supplementary Table 2). The concentration of total tauro-THBAs in the good prognosis group (3607.11 nmol/L, 1851.66–4506.49 nmol/L) was significantly higher than that in the poor prognosis group (1022.25 nmol/L, 749.59–1629.08 nmol/L; P = 0.001). No significant differences were observed in other categories, as well as the molar ratios of tauro-BAs to glyco-BAs and the secondary BAs to the primary BAs between these two patient groups.
To analyze in more detail the role of bile acid modification in these two groups of patients, the respective molar ratios of individual bile acids, conjugated versus unconjugated bile acids, and some atypical modifications versus unmodified forms were examined (Table 2). The process of hydroxylation (GHCA:GCDCA, THCA:TCDCA) was significantly enhanced in patients with a good prognosis compared to patients with a poor prognosis (P = 0.013 and 0.010, respectively). No significant differences were observed in the processes of sulfonation, taurine or glycine conjugation, glucuronidation, or oxide reduction between the two groups.
Bile acid profiles in the validation cohort
To determine whether the results observed in the discovery cohort could be reproduced, the same set of bile acids was profiled in a validation cohort of another 25 JAG1-variant confirmed patients. The difference in polyhydroxylated bile acids, including GHCA, THCA, and three tauro-THBAs (tauro-3α,6α,7α,12α-THBA, tauro-3α,6β,7α,12α-THBA and tauro-2β,3α,7α,12α-THBA), between the two different prognostic groups was confirmed and even more pronounced in the validation cohort (Table 3). Additionally, the molar ratios of GHCA to GCDCA and THCA to TCDCA as indicators of the bile acid metabolism process via hydroxylation were significantly higher in the good prognosis group than in the poor prognosis group. However, no significant difference was observed for 3-oxo-CA between the two prognosis groups in the validation cohort.
Selection and validation of Alagille syndrome prognostic biomarkers
We then focused on poly-hydroxylated bile acids to determine if they could be used as biomarkers to predict the outcomes of young (one-year-old or less) ALGS patients. The variables with P value < 0.05 and area under the curve (AUC) > 0.7, both in the discovery and validation cohorts, were included as the candidates (Table 4). Poly-hydroxylated bile acids, GHCA and tauro-2β,3α,7α,12α-THBA, and the molar ratios of GHCA to GCDCA and THCA to TCDCA were initially enrolled.
Optimal cutoffs (GHCA: 607.69 nmol/L, tauro-2β,3α,7α,12α-THBA: 79.88 nmol/L, GHCA:GCDCA: 0.0220, and THCA:TCDCA: 0.0762) were determined using the Youden index in the discovery cohort (Table 4), and these values were applied to predict prognostic outcomes in the validation cohort. The results are shown in Table 5, where tauro‐2β,3α,7α,12α-THBA achieved an accuracy of 88.00% (92.31% sensitivity and 83.33% specificity), and the molar ratio of THCA to TCDCA achieved a prediction accuracy of 84.00% (100% sensitivity and 67.67% specificity) in the validation cohort.
Univariable and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models
Next, statistical tests of the poly-hydroxylated bile acids (GHCA, THCA, and three tauro-THBAs) and the derivative indexes (GHCA:GCDCA and THCA:TCDCA) by Cox proportional hazard model analysis were used to assess their associations with native liver survivability in the two cohorts using the optimal cutoff values determined above (Table 4). Univariable analysis showed that the concentrations of GHCA, THCA, tauro‐3α,6β,7α,12α-THBA, tauro-2β,3α,7α,12α-THBA, and the ratio of THCA to TCDCA affected native liver survival (Table 6 and Fig. 2), while multivariable analysis indicated that the GHCA concentration was the single independent factor influencing native liver survival [hazard ratio: 13.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.662–63.753, P = 0.002] (Table 6). The ALGS patients with blood GHCA concentrations lower than 607.69 nmol/L had a significantly higher death and/or transplantation rate (7/13 died or received liver transplantation at a median age of one year) than patients with GHCA concentrations higher than 607.69 nmol/L (2/33 received liver transplantation at one year five months old and two years two months old, respectively).
Discussion
To our knowledge, no in-depth bile acid profiling in ALGS patients has been reported previously. The present study focused on analyzing the profiles of bile acids, especially poly-hydroxylated bile acids, in ALGS patients with different clinical outcomes to explore the potential liver prognostic indicators of the disease. We took advantage of a relatively large cohort of patients with follow-up data and a comprehensive panel of different bile acids, including multiple bile acids in the classes of unconjugated THBAs and tauro-THBAs, and used a well-developed bile acid profiling method [16]. We discovered that some poly-hydroxylated bile acids could serve as excellent prognostic biomarkers, and enhanced bile acid poly-hydroxylation may have the ability to predict a good prognosis of ALGS.
Increased hydroxylation makes the bile acid pool more hydrophilic, which is believed to be a common compensatory response observed in animals and patients experiencing cholestatic stress [19]. THBAs, bile acids with four hydroxyl groups, and MCA, bile acids with three hydroxyl groups, in their molecular structures, have been found to be greatly elevated in Bsep−/− mice, and the expression of high levels of such bile acids prevented the progressive liver pathology associated with the Mdr2−/− mutation [25]. Taurine conjugates are the major form of bile acid conjugation in mice [16, 28] and are often elevated in cholestatic human patients [20, 26, 29, 30]. We successfully quantified six new synthetic tauro-THBAs in this study. Consistent with the previous findings that the levels of tauro-THBAs, THCA, and GHCA were increased in patients with ABCB11 deficiency and patients with undiagnosed cholestasis [20], we found that the levels of tauro- or glyco-conjugated polyhydroxylated bile acids in ALGS patients were also increased (compared to those in healthy controls determined by the same methodology in ref 20). The poly-hydroxylated bile acids in ALGS were mainly in tauro- or glyco- conjugated forms rather than unconjugated forms (Supplementary Table 2). More importantly, we observed and verified that higher blood levels of tauro-2β,3α,7α,12α-THBA and GHCA are associated with a better liver and overall prognosis of patients. Both conjugation and hydroxylation are common pathways of bile acid metabolism for increased hydrophilicity and cellular detoxification of hydrophobic bile acids [15]. However, in this study, we found no difference in the molar ratios of bile acid conjugation, such as glyco- to tauro-conjugation or sulfonation, in the ALGS patients associated with outcomes. This suggests that the processes of glyco-, tauro-conjugation, and sulfonation may not be involved in the differentiation of cholestatic responses in ALGS, as often seen in other forms of cholestasis in humans [20, 26, 29]. However, we observed and verified that the molar ratios GHCA to GCDCA and THCA to TCDCA were associated with different prognosis outcomes in this study, indicating that the enhanced bile acid poly-hydroxylation in ALGS patients may contribute to better clinical outcomes and survivability, which was consistent with the results in a cholestasis mouse model by Wang et al. [25]. It is therefore assumed that the high concentration of bile acids in ALGS patients due to cholestasis induces bile acid detoxification by producing poly-hydroxylated bile acids, which are more hydrophilic and less cytotoxic than the usual bile acids found in the control population [19].
One limitation of this study is that we were not able to compare the mRNA expression profiles of hydroxylases in the liver tissue of ALGS patients with different outcomes, as we did not have liver tissues from patients with a good prognosis. In Mdr 2−/− and Bsep−/− mice, it was observed that the process of hydroxylation is enhanced by the up-regulation of hydroxylases [25]. Meanwhile, more studies are warranted to explore whether poly-hydroxylated bile acids can be used as prognostic biomarkers for other forms of cholestasis or cholestatic liver diseases, especially the more prevalent entities, primary biliary cholangitis or primary sclerosing cholangitis, to extend the use of these biomarkers.
The current study has clinical relevance. The presentations and survivability of ALGS patients vary widely [1]. Some severely affected patients require liver transplantation, while others survive and even thrive with the native liver [6]. Unavoidably, some patients die while waiting for a suitable donor. An accurate prognostic biomarker(s) could help to triage patients to more appropriate treatments. The finding that lower levels of blood poly-hydroxylated bile acids indicated poor prognosis with high rates of mortality or liver transplantation implied that more aggressive treatment and more comprehensive management could be clinically applied. The current findings provide some leads for future medical therapeutic development of ALGS. They raise the possibility that enhancing poly-hydroxylation of bile acids might be an effective therapeutic target for patients with cholestasis. In conclusion, the findings from this study indicate that the blood level of two poly-hydroxylated bile acids as liver prognostic biomarkers of ALGS patients: tauro-2β,3α,7α,12α-THBA in ALGS patients before one year of age could be an excellent prognostic biomarker and that GHCA can predict native liver survival of such patients. The increased polyhydroxylated bile acids and enhanced hydroxylation process associated with good clinical outcomes may point to a potential therapeutic target.
Data availability statement
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files. And the primary data would be available on request from the authors.
References
Kamath BM, Ye W, Goodrich NP, Loomes KM, Romero R, Heubi JE, et al. Outcomes of childhood cholestasis in alagille syndrome: results of a multicenter observational study. Hepatol Commun. 2020;4:387–98.
Gilbert MA, Bauer RC, Rajagopalan R, Grochowski CM, Chao G, McEldrew D, et al. Alagille syndrome mutation update: comprehensive overview of JAG1 and NOTCH2 mutation frequencies and insight into missense variant classification. Hum Mutat. 2019;40:2197–220.
Kamath BM, Piccoli DA. Liver disease in children. 3rd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2007.
Kamath BM, Bason L, Piccoli DA, Krantz ID, Spinner NB. Consequences of JAG1 mutations. J Med Genet. 2003;40:891–5.
Spinner NB, Colliton RP, Crosnier C, Krantz ID, Hadchouel M, Meunier-Rotival M. Jagged1 mutations in alagille syndrome. Hum Mutat. 2001;17:18–33.
Kamath BM, Baker A, Houwen R, Todorova L, Kerkar N. Systematic review: the epidemiology, natural history, and burden of Alagille syndrome. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2018;67:148–56.
Emerick KM, Rand EB, Goldmuntz E, Krantz ID, Spinner NB, Piccoli DA. Features of Alagille syndrome in 92 patients: frequency and relation to prognosis. Hepatology. 1999;29:822–910.
Mouzaki M, Bass LM, Sokol RJ, Piccoli DA, Quammie C, Loomes KM, et al. Early life predictive markers of liver disease outcome in an international, multicentre cohort of children with Alagille syndrome. Liver Int. 2016;36:755–60.
Chiang JYL. Bile acid metabolism and signaling in liver disease and therapy. Liver Res. 2017;1:3–9.
Monte MJ, Marin JJ, Antelo A, Vazquez-Tato J. Bile acids: chemistry, physiology, and pathophysiology. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15:804–16.
Hofmann AF, Hagey LR. Key discoveries in bile acid chemistry and biology and their clinical applications: history of the last eight decades. J Lipid Res. 2014;55:1553–95.
Wang R, Sheps JA, Ling V. ABC transporters, bile acids, and inflammatory stress in liver cancer. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2011;12:636–46.
Fickert P, Wagner M. Biliary bile acids in hepatobiliary injury - what is the link? J Hepatol. 2017;67:619–31.
Alnouti Y. Bile acid sulfation: a pathway of bile acid elimination and detoxification. Toxicol Sci. 2009;108:225–46.
Morita SY, Ikeda Y, Tsuji T, Terada T. Molecular mechanisms for protection of hepatocytes against bile salt cytotoxicity. Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo). 2019;67:333–40.
Han J, Liu Y, Wang R, Yang J, Ling V, Borchers CH. Metabolic profiling of bile acids in human and mouse blood by LC-MS/MS in combination with phospholipid-depletion solid-phase extraction. Anal Chem. 2015;87:1127–36.
Caussy C, Hsu C, Singh S, Bassirian S, Kolar J, Faulkner C, et al. Serum bile acid patterns are associated with the presence of NAFLD in twins, and dose-dependent changes with increase in fibrosis stage in patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2019;49:183–93.
Rejchrt S, Hroch M, Repak R, Fejfar T, Douda T, Kohoutova D, et al. Investigation of 23 bile acids in liver bile in benign and malignant biliary stenosis: a pilot study. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2019;2019:5371381.
Sheps JA, Wang R, Wang J, Ling V. The protective role of hydrophilic tetrahydroxylated bile acids (THBA). Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Biol Lipids. 2021;1866:158925.
Liu T, Wang RX, Han J, Hao CZ, Qiu YL, Yan YY, et al. Comprehensive bile acid profiling in hereditary intrahepatic cholestasis: genetic and clinical correlations. Liver Int. 2018;38:1676–85.
Lee CS, Kimura A, Wu JF, Ni YH, Hsu HY, Chang MH, et al. Prognostic roles of tetrahydroxy bile acids in infantile intrahepatic cholestasis. J Lipid Res. 2017;58:607–14.
Fuchs CD, Paumgartner G, Wahlstrom A, Schwabl P, Reiberger T, Leditznig N, et al. Metabolic preconditioning protects BSEP/ABCB11(-/-) mice against cholestatic liver injury. J Hepatol. 2017;66:95–101.
Megaraj V, Iida T, Jungsuwadee P, Hofmann AF, Vore M. Hepatobiliary disposition of 3alpha,6alpha,7alpha,12alpha-tetrahydroxy-cholanoyl taurine: a substrate for multiple canalicular transporters. Drug Metab Dispos. 2010;38:1723–30.
Wang R, Salem M, Yousef IM, Tuchweber B, Lam P, Childs SJ, et al. Targeted inactivation of sister of P-glycoprotein gene (spgp) in mice results in nonprogressive but persistent intrahepatic cholestasis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:2011–6.
Wang R, Sheps JA, Liu L, Han J, Chen PSK, Lamontagne J, et al. Hydrophilic bile acids prevent liver damage caused by lack of biliary phospholipid in Mdr2(-/-) mice. J Lipid Res. 2019;60:85–97.
Liu T, Wang RX, Han J, Qiu YL, Borchers CH, Ling V, et al. Changes in plasma bile acid profiles after partial internal biliary diversion in PFIC2 patients. Ann Transl Med. 2020;8:185.
Warner S, Kelly DA. Liver failure in pediatric gastrointestinal and liver disease (sixth edition). Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2021.
Zheng J, Ye C, Hu B, Yang H, Yao Q, Ma J, et al. Bile acid profiles in bile and feces of obese mice by a high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Biotechnol Appl Biochem. 2021;68:1332–41.
Mao F, Liu T, Hou X, Zhao H, He W, Li C, et al. Increased sulfation of bile acids in mice and human subjects with sodium taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide deficiency. J Biol Chem. 2019;294:11853–62.
Bathena SP, Mukherjee S, Olivera M, Alnouti Y. The profile of bile acids and their sulfate metabolites in human urine and serum. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2013;942–3:53–62.
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful for the support of the families we have studied, and would also like to thank the referring physicians, nurses, and technical staff. We thank Prof. Ying-Jie Zheng (yjzheng@fudan.edu.cn) as an independent statistician for his statistical guidance. This research was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2021YFC 2700800), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81741056, 81873543), and the Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (20YF1402900).
Funding
National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2021YFC 2,700,800 to J-S W. National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81741056 to WJS). National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81873543 to WJS). Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (20YF1402900 to T L).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
WMX, HJ, and LT contributed equally to this paper. WMX: data curation, formal analysis, investigation, project administration, software, validation, visualization, writing–original draft. HJ: formal analysis, methodology, software, writing–review and editing. LT: conceptualization, funding acquisition, project administration. WRX: writing–review and editing. LLT: data curation. LZD: data curation. YJC: formal analysis, methodology. LLL: data curation. LY: data curation. XXB: data curation. GJY: data curation. LSY: data curation. ZL: formal analysis, methodology, software. LV: writing–review and editing. WJS: conceptualization, funding acquisition, project administration, supervision, writing–original draft, writing–review and editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
No financial or non-financial benefits have been received or will be received from any party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article.
Ethical approval
The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Children’s Hospital of Fudan University (Shanghai, China) (No. 2017-99) following the ethical standards of the institutional committee on human experimentation and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1964, as revised in 2000. Informed consent to participate in the study has been obtained from participants or their parent or legal guardian in the case of children under 16.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, MX., Han, J., Liu, T. et al. Poly-hydroxylated bile acids and their prognostic roles in Alagille syndrome. World J Pediatr 19, 652–662 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12519-022-00676-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12519-022-00676-5