Abstract
This study deals with planktic foraminiferal biostratigraphy of the Oligocene-Pliocene successions in the offshore Well A1-89 of the Sirt Basin. One hundred and forty-one ditch cutting samples covering the interval from 1050ft to 9000ft have been analyzed for this study. Fifty-five planktic foraminifera taxa belonging to seventeen genera have been identified. Ten planktic foraminiferal biozones have been recognized herein based on the integration of Bolli and Saunders’s (1985), Berggren et al.(1995), Steininger et al. (GSSP 1997), and Wade et al. (2011), zonal schemes. In descending order, they are Sphaeroidinellopsis seminulina (Zanclean-Piacenzian); Praeorbulina sicana (Burdigalian-Langhian); Globigerinoides bisphericus (Burdigalian); Globigerinatella sp./Catapsydrax dissimilis (Burdigalian); Globigerinoides primordius (Aquitanian); Paragloborotaliakugleri (Aquitanian); Globigerina ciperoensis ciperoensis (Chattian);Globorotalia opima opima (Chattian); Globigerina ampliapertura (Rupelian);Cassigerinella chipolensis/Pseudohastigerina micra (Rupelian). The Oligocene/Miocene boundary is found to be conformable and placed at the top of the Globigerina ciperoensis ciperoensis Biozone. However, the Miocene/Pliocene boundary is unconformable and placed at the top of the Praeorbulina sicana Biozone. Additionally, the established biozones have been regionally correlated with their equivalents in Tunisia and Egypt.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The use of planktic foraminiferal biostratigraphy in the oil industry appeared in the middle of the nineteenth century in the USA and spread quickly through the main oil-producing parts of the world (Stainforth et al. 1975). This has resulted in recognition of their usefulness for precise dating, well-to-well correlations, and sedimentary basin analysis to facilitate interpretation and prediction of critical geologic structures and location of oil accumulations (Stainforth et al. 1975; Bolli and Saunders 1985; Berggren et al. 1995). The Sirt Basin in the north-central part of Libya represents the youngest sedimentary basin and has been interpreted to be an extensional continental rift basin and is referred to as part of the Tethyan rift system (Ahlbrandt 2002). There are several published studies related to the foraminiferal biostratigraphy in the onshore of Sirt Basin (e.g., Berggren 1969, 1974; Eliagoubi and Powell 1980; Muftah 1991; Duronio et al., 1991: Barbieri 1994, 1996; Ashour 1996; Tshakreen et al. 2002; Tshakreen and Gasinski 2004; Tshakreen et al. 2017; Abdulsamad et al. 2019), and most of these studies have been concentrated on the older intervals (Cretaceous and early Paleogene). On the contrary, the planktic foraminiferal biostratigraphic studies in offshore are limited in general, especially those concerning the Oligocene–Pliocene interval. Further east in Egypt some studies concerning Oligo-Miocene planktonic foraminiferal biozones have been published such as (Cherif et al. 1993; Ouda 1998; Boukhary et al. 2012; Hewaidy et al. 2012, 2013; Zakaria et al. 2019). Meanwhile in Tunisia (Hooyberghs and El Ghali 1990; Riahi et al. 2010, 2015; Belayouni et al. 2012, 2013) covering the Oligo-Miocene sections. On the other hand, the Pliocene planktic biozones were studied by Ouda (1998) and Yaakoub et al. (2017) in Egypt and Tunisia, respectively. However, presently, there is a tendency to study the Oligocene, Miocene, and younger horizons at the Libyan offshore from a biostratigraphic point of view, especially after the discoveries of gas fields in the eastern Mediterranean offshore. The current study deals with the study of Oligocene to Pliocene planktic foraminifera retrieved from the Sirt Basin Offshore Well A1-89, which is located near the center of the offshore part of Ajdabiyah Trough in Sirt Basin at Lat. 31° 06′ 22″ N and Long. 19° 50′ 01.00″E (Fig. 1). The examination of the studied samples led to the recovery of many well-preserved planktic foraminifers, and this provides an excellent tool for the taxonomy and biostratigraphy approaches. The objectives of this paper are the following: (1) establishing the planktic foraminiferal biozones and correlating them with equivalent biozones recorded in Tunisia and Egypt and (2) delineating and analyzing the stage boundaries (Oligocene–Miocene and Miocene-Pliocene boundaries).
Materials, methods, and depository
The studied offshore Well Al-89 has no cores or sidewall core samples; therefore, this study has been performed based only on ditch cutting samples covering the interval from 1050 to 9000 ft. These samples are provided by the exploration division management of Arabian Gulf Oil Company (AGOCO). One hundred and forty-one samples with a 50′ apart interval form the raw material of this work. The samples are crushed gently by pestle and mortar then washed using a gentle current of tap water through a 63-µm mesh sieve (British standard mesh). The residue then was dried on a hotplate at 70 °C. Finally, the dried residue of every sample is examined under a stereoscopic microscope, and the planktic foraminifers were picked up into micropaleontological slides and then identified based on their morphologic features. Fifty-five taxa have been identified and mounted on numbered slides. Selected specimens were photographed using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) at the Department of Geoscience in the University of Indiana Pennsylvania. All foraminiferal slides including the diagnostic species are labeled and deposited in the micropaleontology section of the Department of Earth Sciences, University of Benghazi in Libya.
Lithostratigraphy
The studied succession in well A1-89 is represented by a sequence of carbonate and fine clastic rocks ranging in age from early Oligocene to early Pliocene with a total thickness of about 7950 ft. These successions were deposited in a deep marine environment, displaying different rock types and microfossils assemblages in comparison to the co-eval rock units in Sirt Basin and Al Jabal al Akhdar areas, which are deposited in relatively shallower marine settings. Due to the several unmatched stratigraphic nomenclatures used in Sirte Basin and Al Jabal al Akhdar region by different oil companies and several institutes for the Oligocene and younger rock units. Therefore, the stratigraphic column of AGOCO geologists is adopted herein. This stratigraphic column is assembled using the provided data from AGOCO which included the Well-A1-89 log and ditch cutting samples (Fig. 2). This column was differentiated into the following subdivisions based on the lithological changes and fossil contents in ascending order:
Oligocene sequence
The Oligocene sequence occupies the interval from 4650 to 9000 ft, and they are subdivided into four lithological units: unit 1 (850 ft. thick) is composed of an alternation of subfissile, dark gray, medium-hard shale interbedded with calcareous claystone with a thin streak of slightly chalky limestone, grades upward into unit 2 (2400 ft. thick) which composed of gray, medium-hard, highly calcareous claystone, containing thin streaks of creamy, medium-hard argillaceous limestone at the upper part, followed by unit 3 (400 ft. thick) which composed of yellowish-green, medium-hard, argillaceous limestone. The uppermost Oligocene unit 4 (650 ft. thick) is composed of green, medium-hard calcareous claystone interbedded at the top with thick beds of greenish-gray, soft shale (see Fig. 2).
Miocene sequence
The Miocene rocks occupy the interval from 1850 to 4650 ft and rest conformably on the Oligocene sequence and subdivided into two lithological units: unit 1 (1800 ft. thick) is composed of cream, medium-hard, argillaceous limestone interbedded with gray, medium-hard, calcareous claystone with thin streaks of gray, soft, and fissile shale. The upper Miocene unit 2 (1050 ft. thick) is composed of gray, soft to medium-hard, calcareous claystone interbedded with yellowish-brown, hard, marly, and silty dolostone (see Fig. 2).
Pliocene sequence
The Pliocene sequence spans the interval from 1050 to 1850 ft. It rests unconformably on the Middle Miocene sediments and consists of green, soft, silty, calcareous claystone interbedded with cream, soft marly limestone (see Fig. 2).
Biostratigraphy
The zonation schemes of Bolli and Saunders (1985), Berggren et al. (1995), and Steininger et al. (GSSP 1997) for the Oligocene-Early Miocene successions as well as Wade et al. (2011) and Iaccarino (1985), for younger successions, have been followed in this study due to the reported diagnostic taxa and the geographical position of the studied site. All the studied samples are ditch cuttings (i.e., collected during drilling in open hole conditions), and the contamination due to the caving problem is a major challenge in such biostratigraphic study. Therefore highest occurrence (HO) (= the first downhole appearance (FDA) of the diagnostic species was used to recognize the boundaries of each biozone. Many biostratigraphers consider the highest occurrence (HO) of diagnostic taxa more applicable and reliable for biostratigraphic analysis in ditch cuttings samples (e.g., Iaccarino and Salvatorini 1982; Lin et al. 2004; Li et al. 2007). The species of stratigraphic value are photographed and shown on (Fig. 3). The vertical stratigraphic distribution of the identified species throughout the studied succession led to the establishment of ten planktic foraminiferal biozones (i.e., four Oligocene biozones, five Miocene biozones, and one Pliocene biozone) which are illustrated in (Figs. 4 and 5). These biozones are correlated with their equivalents biozones recorded in the neighboring countries, “Tunisia and Egypt.”
Biostratigraphy of the studied well
Sphaeroidinellopsis seminulina s.l. Acme biozone (N18) early Pliocene (Zanclean)
Definition
Interval from lowest occurrence (LO) of prominent open marine conditions in the Mediterranean after the Late Miocene salinity crisis to the LO of Globorotalia margaritae (Iaccarino 1985). This biozone corresponds to Sphaeroidinellopsis spp. Acme biozone according to earlier studies of Cita (1973, 1975, 1976).
Remarks
The upper boundary of this biozone in this study is defined at the depth 1050, and its lower boundary is defined by the highest occurrence (HO) of Praeorbulina spp. and covers the interval from 1050 to 1850′. This biozone is characterized by a predominance of planktic foraminifers in great diversity with excellent preservation. The associated planktic foraminiferal taxa in this biozone include Sphaeroidinellopsis disjuncta, Ss. sphaeroides, Sphaeroidinella dehiscens, Orbulina universa, O. bilobata, O. suturalis, Globigerinoides obliquus obliquus, Gds. obliquus extremus, Gds. sacculifer, Gds. trilobus, Gds. immaturus, Gds. ruber, Gds. quadrilobatus, Globigerina praebulloides praebulloides, Gg. praebulloides occlusa, Gg. falconensis, Globigerinita naparimaensis, Ggt. incrusta, Zeaglobigerina woodi woodi, Globigerinella obesa, and Globoquadrina dehiscens (Fig. 5).
Geographical correlation
This biozone is equivalent to Sphaeroidinellopsis seminulina s.l. biozone recorded by Ouda (1998) from the Pliocene strata in the Sallum hole-1well in the northern part of the Western Desert of Egypt. However, in Tunisia, this biozone is equivalent to Sphaeroidinellopsis spp. Acme biozone recorded by Moissette et al. (2010) from Raf Raf Formation at Oued Galaa section in northern Tunisia.
Praeorbulina sicana lowest occurrence biozone (M5) middle Miocene (Burdigalian-Langhian)
.
Definition
Interval from the LO of Praeorbulina sicana to the LO of Orbulina suturalis (Wade et al. 2011).
According to the Mediterranean biozonation scheme of Iaccarino (1985), this biozone was called Praeorbulina glomerosa biozone.
Remarks
The upper boundary of this biozone is defined herein, by the HO of the Praeorbulina sicana, P. glomerosa, and P. transitoria; however, the lower boundary of this biozone is defined by the absence of all Praeorbulina spp. and covers the interval from 1850 to 2150′. This biozone is characterized by a predominance of planktic foraminifers with great diversity and excellent preservation. The associated planktic foraminiferal taxa include Praeorbulina transitoria, P. sicana, Sphaeroidinellopsis disjuncta, Orbulina suturalis, O. universa, O. bilobata, Globigerinoides obliquus obliquus, Gds. sacculifer, Gds. trilobus, Gds. immaturus, Gds. ruber, Gds. subquadratus, Gds. quadrilobatus, Gds. bisphericus, Paragloborotalia mayeri, Pg. siakensis, Pg. continuosa, Globigerinella obesa, Dentoglobigerina altispira altispira, Globoquadrina dehiscens, Globigerinita naparimaensis, Ggt. incrusta, Globigerina praebulloides praebulloides, Gg. praebulloides occlusa, Gg. falconensis, and Zeaglobigerina woodi woodi (Fig. 5).
Geographical correlation
This biozone is equivalent to Praeorbulina glomerosa biozone of Hewaidy et al. (2013) from the lower part of the Sidi Salem Formation in the onshore Qantara-2 well and offshore wells PFMD2RBIS and Helm-1 in the eastern Nile Delta of Egypt. However, in Tunisia, this biozone is equivalent to Globigerinoides sicanus/Praeorbulina glomerosa biozone of Hooyberghs (1973, 1977) and Hooyberghs and El Ghali (1990) from Oued Hammam Formation at Oued Sidi Hamouda section in central Tunisia.
Globigerinoides bisphericus Partial-Range biozone (M4) early Miocene (Burdigalian)
Definition
Interval from the HO of Catapsydrax dissimilis to the LO of Praeorbulina sicana (Wade et al. 2011).
According to the Mediterranean biozonation scheme of Iaccarino (1985), this biozone is called Globigerinoides trilobus biozone.
Remarks
The upper boundary of this biozone is defined herein with care, by the approximate absence of Praeorbulina sicana, P. glomerosa, and P. transitoria due to the nature of ditch cutting samples; this boundary is approximate. The lower boundary is defined by the HO of Catapsydrax dissimilis and covers the interval from 2150to 2400′. This biozone is characterized by a great abundance of planktic foraminifers with great diversity and moderate to excellent preservation. The associated planktic foraminiferal taxa in this biozone include Praeorbulina sicana, Globigerinoides obliquus obliquus, Gds. obliquus extremus, Gds. sacculifer, Gds. immaturus Gds. ruber, Gds. subquadratus, Gds. quadrilobatus, Paragloborotalia mayeri, Pg. continuosa, Pg. siakensis, Globigerinella obesa, Dentoglobigerina altispira altispira, Globoquadrina dehiscens, Globigerinita naparimaensis, Ggt. incrusta, Sphaeroidinellopsis disjuncta, Globigerina praebulloides, Gg. falconensis, and Zeaglobigerina woodi woodi (Fig. 5).
Geographical correlation
This biozone is equivalent to the Praeorbulina sicana biozone of Hewaidy et al. (2013) from Qantara Formation at wells Qantara-2 and PFMD2RBIS in the eastern Nile Delta area. However, in Tunisia, this biozone is equivalent to the N6–N7 biozone of Blow (1969) recorded by Glacon and Rouvier (1967) and Belayouni et al. (2013) from Babouch Member at Babouch and Cap-Serrat areas.
Globigerinatella sp./Catapsydrax dissimilis concurrent-range biozone (M3) early Miocene (Burdigalian)
Definition
Concurrent range of the nominate taxa between the LO of Globigerinatella sp. and the HO of Catapsydrax dissimilis (Wade et al. 2011).
According to the Mediterranean biozonation scheme of Iaccarino (1985), this biozone is called Globigerinoides altiaperturus/Catapsydrax dissimilis sub-biozone.
Remarks
The upper boundary of this biozone in the present study is defined by the HO of the zonal marker Catapsydrax dissimilis. However, the lower boundary is defined by the highest occurrence (HO) of Globigerina primordius and covers the interval from 2400 to 2900′. This biozone is characterized by a super-abundance of planktic foraminifers with high diversity and excellent preservation. The associated planktic foraminiferal taxa include Globigerinoides obliquus obliquus, Gds. sacculifer, Gds. trilobus, Gds. immaturus, Gds. subquadratus, Gds. altiaperturus, Gds. quadrilobatus, Paragloborotalia mayeri, Pg. continuosa, Pg. siakensis, Dentoglobigerina altispira altispira, Globoquadrina venezuelana, Gq. euapertura, Gq. dehiscens, Globigerina praebulloides, Gg. falconensis, Gg. ouachitaensis gnaucki, Zeaglobigerina woodi woodi, Globigerinita naparimaensis, Ggt. incrusta, Globigerinella praesiphonifera, and Ggl. obesa (Fig. 5).
Geographical correlation
This biozone is equivalent to Catapsydrax dissimilis biozone recorded by Hewaidy et al. (2013) from Qantara Formation at offshore wells PFMD2RBIS and Helm-1 in the eastern Nile Delta area. However, in Tunisia, this biozone is equivalent to Catapsydrax dissimilis biozone recorded by Riahi et al. (2010) from the upper part of Zouza Member at the Balta-Bou Goutrane section in the Balta–Bougoutrane area in northern Tunisia.
Globigerinoides primordius highest-occurence biozone (N4) early Miocene (Aquitanian)
Definition
This biozone is defined in this study as the interval from the HO of Globorotalia kugleri to the HO of the zonal marker Globigerinoides primordius. On the other hand, this biozone is equivalent to the Globigerinoides primordius concurrent-range biozone (N4) of (Blow 1969; emended by Bolli and Saunders 1985), who defined it as interval from the LO of frequent Globigerinoides primordius/trilobus s.l. to HO of Globorotalia kugleri.
According to the Mediterranean biozonation scheme of Iaccarino (1985), this biozone was called Globoquadrina dehiscens sub-biozone of Globoquadrina dehiscens dehiscens/Catapsydrax dissimilis biozone.
Remarks
The upper boundary of this biozone is defined herein, by the HO of the zonal marker Globigerinoides primordius while the lower boundary is defined by the HO of Paragloborotalia kugleri and covers the interval from 2900 to 4350′. This biozone is characterized by the predominance of planktic foraminifers with high diversity, and excellent preservation. The associated planktic foraminiferal taxa include Globigerinoides sacculifer, Gds. trilobus, Gds. immaturus, Paragloborotalia mayeri, Pg. siakensis, Dentoglobigerina altispira altispira, Globoquadrina venezuelana, Gq. euapertura, Globigerina praebulloides, Gg. falconensis, Gg. ouachitaensis gnaucki, Zeaglobigerina woodi woodi, Globigerinita naparimaensis, Catapsydrax dissimlis, Globigerinella praesiphonifera, Ggl. obesa, and rare Cassigerinella chipolensis (Fig. 5). Berggren et al. (1995) claimed that this biozone is a part of Paraglobolotaria kugleri biozone (M1a).
Geographical correlation
This biozone is well correlated to Globigerinoides primordius biozone (N4) recorded by Hewaidy et al. (2012) from the upper part of the Nukhul Formation at Wadi Baba in the southwest Sinai Peninsula. However, in Tunisia, this biozone is equivalent to Globigerinoides primordius biozone as recorded by Riahi et al. (2010) from the upper part of Zouza Member at Tebaba and El Gassa–Msid sections in the East of Jebel Zouza in northern Tunisia.
Paragloborotalia kugleri total range biozone (M1) early Miocene (Aquitanian)
Definition
Total range of the Paragloborotalia kugleri (Berggren et al. 1983).
According to the Mediterranean biozonation scheme of Iaccarino (1985), this biozone was called Globoquadrina dehiscens sub-biozone of Globoquadrina dehiscens dehiscens/Catapsydrax dissimilis biozone.
Remarks
The upper boundary of this biozone is defined herein, by the HO of the zonal marker Paragloborotalia kugleri, and the lower boundary is defined by the HO of Globigerina ciperoensis ciperoensis and covers the interval from 4350 to 4650′. This biozone is characterized by a low abundance of planktic foraminifers with moderate diversity and low frequencies with moderate preservation. The associated planktonic foraminiferal taxa include Globigerinoides primordius, Globoquadrina venezuelana, Gq. euapertura, Globigerina tripartita, Gg. praebulloides, Gg. ouachitaensis gnaucki, Zeaglobigerina woodi woodi, Catapsydrax dissimilis, and Cassigerinella chipolensis (Fig. 5). Berggren et al. 1995 and Steininger et al. 1997 of GSSP project raised this biozone to be Aquitanian (early Miocene) rather than Chattian (late Oligocene). Herein, the Paragloborotalia kugleri biozone is adopted as Early Miocene following Steininger et al. (1997).
Geographical correlation
This biozone is equivalent to Paragloborotalia kugleri biozone, recorded by Hewaidy et al. (2013) from the lower part of the Qantarah Formation in the Qantara-2 well, offshore wells PFMD2RBIS, and Helm-1 well in the eastern Nile Delta of Egypt. However, in Tunisia, this biozone is equivalent to (N4 Zone of Blow 1969) biozone recorded by Riahi et al. (2015) from the Numidian Formation in northern Tunisia.
Globigerina ciperoensis ciperoensis highest-occurrence biozone (P22) late Oligocene (Chattian)
Definition
Biostratigraphic interval characterized by the partial range of the nominate taxon between the HO of Paragloborotalia opima opima and the LO of Globorotalia kugleri s.s (Cushman and Stainforth 1945; emended by Bolli 1957; P22 of Berggren and Miller 1988).
Remarks
The upper boundary of this biozone is defined herein, by the HO of the zonal marker Globigerina ciperoensis ciperoensis; however, the lower boundary is defined by the HO of Paragloborotalia opima opima and covers the interval from 4650 to 5750′. This biozone is characterized by a low abundance of planktic foraminifers with moderate diversity and moderate to good preservation. The associated planktic foraminiferal taxa include Paragloborotalia opima nana, Globoquadrina venezuelana, Gq. euapertura, Globigerina tripartita, Gg. praebulloides, Gg. ouachitaensis gnaucki, and Cassigerinella chipolensis (Fig. 5).
Geographical correlation
This biozone is equivalent to Globigerina ciperoensis biozone (P22), recorded by Hewaidy et al. (2014) from the lowermost part of the Nukhul Formation at Wadi Wasit section in west-central Sinai of Egypt. However, in Tunisia, this biozone is well correlated with the lower part of Globigerina ciperoensis biozone recorded by Belayouni et al. (2012) from the intermediate interval in the sub-Numidian succession at Zahret-Mediene area in northwestern Tunisia.
Globorotalia opima opima highest-occurrence biozone (P21) late Oligocene (Chattian)
Definition
Total range of the zonal marker Globorotalia opima opima, from its LO to its HO (Bolli 1957).
Remarks
The upper boundary of this biozone in the present study is defined by the HO of the zonal marker Paragloborotalia opima opima and its lower boundary is defined by the HO of Globigerina ampliapertura and covers the interval from 5750 to 6450′. This biozone is characterized by common planktic foraminifers of low diversity and moderate preservation. The associated planktic foraminiferal taxa include Paragloborotalia opima nana, Globigerina ciperoensis ciperoensis, Gg. tripartita, Globoquadrina euapertura, and Cassigerinella chipolensis (Fig. 5).
Geographical correlation
This biozone is well correlated with the Globorotalia opima opima biozone, recorded by Cherif et al. (1993) from the lower part of the Qantarah Formation at the wells Temsah-II, San El Hagar-lX, and Boughaz-l in the Isthmus of Suez and the North-Eastern reach of the Nile Delta of Egypt. However, in Tunisia, this biozone is equivalent to the Globorotalia opima opima biozone recorded by Riahi et al. (2010) from the lower part of Zouza Member at the Tebaba section in the east of Jebel Zouza in northern Tunisia.
Globigerina ampliapertura highest-occurrence biozone (P19-P20) early Oligocene (Rupelian).
Definition
Partial range of the zonal marker, between the HO of Pseudohastigerina micra and the LO of Globorotalia opima opima (Bolli 1957; redefined by Bolli 1966).
Remarks
The upper boundary of this biozone in the present study is defined by the HO of the zonal marker Globigerina ampliapertura and its lower boundary is defined by the HO of Pseudohastigerina micra and covers the interval from 6450 to 7450′. This biozone is characterized by an abundance of planktic foraminifers with moderate diversity and moderate preservation. The associated planktic foraminiferal taxa in this biozone include Globigerina ciperoensis ciperoensis, Gg. tripartita, Gg. cryptomphala, Globoquadrina euapertura, Gq. venezuelana, Subbotina linaperta, S. eocaena, S. angiporoides, Paragloborotalia opima nana, Cassigerinella chipolensis, and Catapsydrax dissimilis (Fig. 5).
Geographical correlation
This biozone is reported by Ouda (1998) from the lower part of the Dabaa Formation at the subsurface sections north of Qattarah depression in the northern part of the Western Desert of Egypt. However, in Tunisia, this biozone was reported by Riahi et al. (2010) from the lower part of Zouza Member at Tebaba and El Gassa–Msid sections in the East of Jebel Zouza in northern Tunisia.
Cassigerinella chipolensis/Pseudohastigerina micra Concurrent-Range biozone (P18) early Oligocene (Rupelian).
Definition
Joint occurrence of the two biozonal markers from the LO of Cassigerinella chipolensis to the HO of the Pseudohastigerina micra (Blow and Banner 1962; renamed by Bolli 1966).
Remark
It is the oldest biozone defined in the present study, and its upper boundary is defined by the HO of the zonal marker Pseudohastigerina micra, as well as the associated species Subbotina angiporoides, S. linaperta, and S. eocaena. The lower boundary, however, cannot be delineated herein. This biozone covers the interval from 7450 to 9000′. This biozone is characterized by an abundance of planktic foraminifers with high diversity and excellent preservation. The associated planktic foraminiferal taxa include Globigerina ciperoensis ciperoensis, Gg. tripartita, Gg. cf. taburiensis, Gg. cryptomphala, Globoquadrina venezuelana, Gq. euapertura, Paragloborotalia opima nana, Subbotina linaperta, S. eocaena, S. angiporoides, and Catapsydrax dissimilis (Fig. 5).
Geographical correlation
This biozone is equivalent to the Pseudohastigerina spp. biozone recorded by Ouda (1998) from the lower part of the Dabaa Formation at the subsurface sections north of Qattarah depression in the northern part of the western desert of Egypt. However, in Tunisia, this biozone is equivalent to the Pseudohastigerina naguewichiensis biozone (O1) recorded by Yaakoub et al. (2017) from the upper part of Souar Formation at Menzel Bou Zelfa and Jhaff sections in northeastern Tunisia.
The O/M boundary
The O/M boundary is a good example of an interval that has not undergone any significant environmental changes; also, the biotic turnover is very low (extension and organization) within all microfossils, especially in planktic foraminifera (Spezzaferri 1994). The O/M boundary worldwide lacked widely applicable correlation tools in the Chattian stratotype itself. The Aquitanian stratotype contains planktic foraminiferal assemblage suggesting foraminiferal biozone N4 and lower portion of N5 of Blow (1969). The boundary can be recognized within the top part of the foraminiferal Zone P22 of Cushman and Stainforth (1945) and Berggren et al. (1995). Many planktic foraminiferal biostratigraphers place the O/M boundary at the base of Aquitanian stage, or the first occurrence datum of the Paragloborotalia kugleri Interval biozone in tropical areas (Bizon and Bizon 1972; Bizon 1979; Cita and Premoli Silva 1968), and informally based on the first occurrence datum of the early Miocene Globoquadrina dehiscens dehiscens in Mediterranean region (Jenkins 1966, 1971; Berggren and Andurer 1973; Keller 1980; Kennett and Srinivasan 1983; Iaccarino and Salvatorini 1982; Iaccarino 1985; Di Stefano et al. 2008). However, a different point of view placed this boundary with the top of the Paragloborotalia kugleri biozone of Bolli (1957) at the LO of Globigerinoides primordius as presented by Bolli and Saunders (1985). Furthermore, the diversification of the genus Globigerinoides is an additional event to recognize the O/M boundary (Spezzaferri 1994). The O/M boundary in the present study placed at the top of the Globigerina ciperoensis ciperoensis biozone according to Berggren and Miller (1988) and Berggren et al. (1995) based on the integrated magnetostratigraphy and planktic foraminiferal stratigraphy in comparison with the eustatic sea-level chart of Haq et al. (1988). The HO of the Globigerina ciperoensis ciperoensis and the associated Oligocene planktic taxa defines the top of the Oligocene as it correlates with the end of Chron C6Cn2r (= 23.800 Ma) proposed by (Steininger 1994; Steininger et al. 1997) that delineates the O/M boundary. However, the Miocene planktic foraminifers Globigerinoides and Paragloborotalia dominate the lower Miocene interval. This suggests that the sedimentation in Well A1-89 is continuous with no break, marking a conformable contact. However, across this boundary, remarkable changes in diversity, abundance, and preservation of foraminiferal assemblage are observed. It is obvious to mention that the Miocene foraminiferal assemblage, which typified by the occurrence of Globigerinoides spp. (Speezaferri 1994) at this level was more diverse and abundant with excellent preservation than the Oligocene foraminiferal suit. Elsewhere, these changes were also reported at the O/M boundary in Egypt by Hewaidy et al. (2012, 2014) as well.
The M/P boundary
The Miocene/Pliocene (M/P) boundary, according to Cita (1975), is corresponding to the LO of the permanent open marine condition in the Mediterranean after regression and dryness of the sea. Biostratigraphically, the boundary in the tropical areas can be recognized within the top portion of the Neogloboquadrina duetertiri biozone at the LO of Globorotalia margaritae (Bolli 1957, 1966, 1970; Bolli and Premoli Silva 1973); also, the boundary is placed at the top part of Globorotalia tumida- Sphaeroidinella subdehiscens biozone at the LO of Sphaeroidinella dehiscens (Blow and Banner 1966; Blow 1969). In the temperate regions, the boundary is defined at the top of Globorotalia conomiozea biozone at the first evolutionary occurrence of Globorotalia puncticulata (Kennett 1973). During the 1960s and 1970s, many Pliocene foraminiferal biozonations of the Mediterranean have been proposed (Cita and Premoli-Silva 1968; Cita 1973; Bizon and Bizon 1972; Cita 1975; Bizon 1979; Borsetti et al. 1979; Colalongo et al. 1982; Iaccarino and Salvatorini 1982) and most of them were summarized by Iaccarino (1985). The M/P boundary in the present study is placed at the top of Praeorbulina sicana biozone of Wade et al. (2011). The boundary herein well A1-89 is defined by the HO of Praeorbulina sicana with co-occurrences of Praeorbulina transitoria, Praeorbulina glomerosa, Globigerinoides bisphericus, and Orbulina suturalis. The presence of the latter species indicates the absence of Orbulina suturalis (M6) biozone of Wade et al. (2011). Generally, in the Well A1-89, the M/P unconformity represents the biozones from PL2 (Globorotalia margaritae) to M6 (Orbulina suturalis) and indicates a long-term unconformity. We suggest the reason to be tectonically induced, probably linked to the events occurring in the Hellenic subduction where Cyrenaica and Sirt Basin tectonic agenda matches the geodynamic evolution of the Hellenic domain, as suggested by (Arsenikos et al. 2013).
A similar hiatus has been reported locally in the Cyrenician offshore Well A1/NC120 by Duronio et al. (1991), where the Pliocene strata rest unconformably on Middle Miocene one with a complete absence of Late Miocene (Tortonian-Messinian), and have ascribed this hiatus to an uplifting phase affecting northern Cyrenica during the Late Miocene. This hiatus is also reported from offshore of northwestern Egypt by Ouda (1998). Furthermore, Ouda and Obaidallah (1995) report this hiatus from the Nile delta and they attribute it to the tectonic rifting of the Arabian plate from the African plate. However, in the offshore Well B1-NC35A study, Hinte et al. (1991) assumed that there was no tectonic event and the sea gradually lowered for 50 m and then suddenly dropped to more than 450 m, which later returned to normal, some movement being allowed as the result of continued compaction of the underlying section and of the isostatic effect of unloading and reloading by the water column (Hinte et al. 1991). During the Messinian salinity crisis (MSC), as defined by Hsu et al. (1973), the Mediterranean Sea shrank to a few hypersaline pools and northeastern Africa was connected to Europe by a salt desert (Hsü et al. 1973a, b). This extraordinary event allows the accumulation of thick evaporitic deposits as reported in exposures of Cyrenica in northeast Libya (El Hawat and Shelmani 1993). However, in the As Sahabi area, the large gypseum crystals infilling polygonal desiccated fractures at two stratigraphical horizons in the Lower Member (P) of the Sahabi Formation (De Heinzelin and El Arnauti 1982; Muftah et al. 2008). The evaporates are not deposited in the offshore studied well A1-89 together with underneath rocks during Serravalian and Tortonian times. Mascle and Mascle (2019) claimed the reason for this MSC is due to some parameters, including deep outflows of salty water, paleogeographical reconstruction of the Messinian basins, and their syntectonic origin. This MSC event, supported by the water balance of the Mediterranean, was quite deficient through the Strait of Gibraltar and a thick evaporite sequence.
Conclusions
1-The Oligocene–Pliocene successions in the offshore Well-A1-89 in Sirt Basin have been subjected to planktic foraminiferal biostratigraphy. Ten planktic foraminiferal biozones from Piacenzian–Rupelian have been established within the studied succession following Bolli and Saunders’s (1985), Iaccarino (1985), Berggren et al. (1995), Steininger et al. (GSSP 1997), and Wade et al. (2011) zonal schemes; in descending order, they are Sphaeroidinellopsis seminulina s.l. biozone, Praeorbulina sicana biozone, Globigerinoides bisphericus biozone, Globigerinatella sp./Catapsydrax dissimilis biozone, Globigerinoides primordius biozone, Paragloborotalia kugleri biozone, Globigerina ciperoensis ciperoensis biozone, Globorotalia opima opima biozone, Globigerina ampliapertura biozone, and Cassigerinella chipolensis/Pseudohastigerina micra biozone.
2-The established biozones are correlated with the equivalent biozones introduced by (Hooyberghs 1973, 1977; Riahi et al. 2010, 2015; Moissette et al. 2010; Belayouni et al. 2012, 2013; Yaakoub et al. 2017), which includes Pseudohastigerina naguewichiensis, Globigerina ampliapertura, Globorotalia opima opima, Globigerina ciperoensis, Globigerinoides primordius, Catapsydrax dissimilis, Globigerinoides sicanus/Praeorbulina glomerosa, and Sphaeroidinellopsis spp. biozones in the Tunisian sections. However, in Egypt are correlated with the equivalent biozones introduced by (Cherif et al. 1993; Ouda 1998; Hewaidy et al. 2012, 2013, 2014), which includes Pseudohastigerina spp., Globigerina ampliapertura, Globorotalia opima opima, Globigerina ciperoensis, Paragloborotalia kugleri, Globigerinoides primordius, Catapsydrax dissimilis, Praeorbulina sicana, Praeorbulina glomerosa, and Sphaeroidinellopsis spp. biozones.
3-The O/M boundary in the present study is placed at the top of the Globigerina ciperoensis ciperoensis biozone of Berggren et al. (1995), as defined by the HO of the Globigerina ciperoensis ciperoensis. However, the Miocene planktic foraminifera (Globigernoides and Paragloborotalia) dominate the lower Miocene interval. This led to suggest that the sedimentation in Well A1-89 is continuous with no break, marking a conformable contact.
4-The M/P boundary in the well A1-89 placed at the top of Praeorbulina sicana biozone of Wade et al. (2011). The nature of this boundary in this study is a long-term unconformity surface as defined by the lack of almost all the middle and late Miocene biozones that were established by Wade et al. (2011). This hiatus was similarly reported by Duronio et al. (1991) in the well A1/NC120 in the offshore Cyrenica, Libya. Meanwhile, in Egypt, this hiatus was reported by Ouda and Obaidalla (1995) as well as Ouda (1998) from the Nile delta, and from northwestern offshore, respectively.
Availability of data and materials
Not applicable.
Code availability
Not applicable.
Change history
23 February 2022
Springer Nature’s version of this paper was updated to fix the word spacing in Abstract section.
References
Abdulsamad EO, Tmalla FA, Bu-Argoub FM (2019) Biostratigraphy of Palaeocene to Miocene Foraminifera in concession 65, SE Sirt Basin, Libya, Libyan. J Sci Technol 9(1):46–52
Ahlbrandt TS (2002) The Sirte Basin Provinces of Libya, Sirte-Zelten total petroleum system. US Geological Survey Bulletin 2202-F, pp 1–29
Arsenikos S, de Lamotte DF, Chamot-Rooke N, Mohn G, Bonneau MC, Blanpied C (2013) Mechanism and timing of tectonic inversion in Cyrenaica (Libya): integration in the geodynamics of the East Mediterranean. Tectonophysics 608:319–329
Ashour MM (1996) Microbiostratigraphical analysis of the Campanian–Maastrichtian strata in some wells in Sirt Basin. In: The Geology of Sirt Basin. Salem MJ, Mouzughi AJ, Hammuda OS (eds) 1:243–264
Barbieri R (1994) Foraminiferal paleoenvironmental constraints in the Sirt-Shale (Late Campanian-Early Maastrichtian) transgressive succession of the Hameimat Basin, Northern Libya. Cretaceous Res 15(5):625–644
Barbieri R (1996) Micropaleontology of the Rakab Group (Cenomanian to early Maastrichtian) in the Hameimat Basin, northern Libya. In: Geology of Sirt Basin, 1st symposium on the sedimentary basins of Libya 1:185–194
Belayouni H, Guerrera F, Martin-Martin M, Serrano F (2012) Stratigraphic update of the Cenozoic Sub-Numidian formations of the Tunisian Tell (North Africa): Tectonic/sedimentary evolution and correlations along the Maghrebian Chain. J Afr Earth Sc 64:48–64
Belayouni H, Guerrera F, Martin-Martin M, Serrano F (2013) Paleogeographic and geodynamic Miocene evolution of the Tunisian Tell (Nu midi an and Post-Nu midi a Successions): bearing with the Maghrebian Chain. Int J Earth Sci 102:831–855
Berggren WA (1969) Biostratigraphy and planktonic foraminiferal zonation of the Tertiary system of the Sirte Basin of Libya, North Africa. In: Brönnimann P., Renz H. (Eds.), Proceedings of the First International Conference on Planktonic Microfossils, Leiden, EJ Brill pp 104–120
Berggren WA (1974) Paleocene benthic foraminifera1 biostratigraphy, biogeography, and paleoecology of Libya and Mali. Micropaleontology 20(4):449–465
Berggren WA, Andurer M (1973) Late Paleogene (Oligocene) and -Neogene Planktonic foraminiferal biostratigraphy of the Atlantic Ocean (Lat. 30°N to Lat. 30°8). Riv Italiana Paleontol Stratigr 79(3):337–392
Berggren WA, Hamilton N, Johnson DA, Pujol C, Weiss W, Weiss P, Cepek P, Gombos AM Jr (1983) Magnetobiostratigraphy of Deep Sea Drilling Project Leg 72, Sites 515–518, Rio Grande Rise (South Atlantic). Init Rep Deep Sea Drilling Proj 72:939–948
Berggren WA, Kent D, Swisher CC, Aubry MP (1995) A revised Cenozoic geochronology and chronostratigraphy. In Berggren WA, Kent, DV, Aubry, MP, and Hardenbol, J (Eds.), Geochronology, Time Scales and Global Stratigraphic Correlation. Spec. Publ.—SEPM 54:129–212
Berggren WA, Miller KG (1988) Paleogene tropical planktonic foraminiferal biostratigraphy and magnetobiochronology. Micropaleontology 34:362–380
Bizon G (1979) Planktonic foraminifera. In: Report of the working group on Micropaleontology. 7th International Congress of Mediterranean Neogene, Athens ( Edited by Bizon, G.et.al.).Annals Geologiques Pays Helleniques pp 1340–1343
Bizon G, Bizon JJ (1972) Atlas des principaux foraminifers planktoniques du basin Mediterranean. Oligocene – Quaternairee Editions Technique, Paris p 316
Blow WH (1969) Late Middle Eocene to recent planktonic foraminiferal biostratigraphy. Proceedings of First International Conference on Planktonic Microfossils, Geneve 1:199-422
Blow WH, Banner FT (1962) The Tertiary (Upper Eocene to Aquitanian) Globigerinaceae. In: Fundamentals of mid-tertiary stratigraphical correlation. E. F. Eames, F.T Banner, W.H. Blow and W.J. Clarke Eds., Cambridge University Press, London Part 2 pp 61–151
Bolli HM (1957) Planktonic foraminifera from Oligo-Miocene Cipero and Lengua Formation of Trinidad. U S Nat Mus Bull 215:97–123
Bolli HM (1966) Zonation of Cretaceous to Pliocene Marine Sediments Based on Planktonic Foraminifera. Bol Inf Asoc Venez 9(1):1–32
Bolli HM (1970) The foraminifera of sites 23–31, leg 4. In: Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Program, R.G. Bader, R.D. Gerard et al. (Eds.), Washington (U.S. Government Printing Office) 4:577–643
Bolli HM, Premoli Silva I (1973) Oligocene to Recent planktonic foraminifera and stratigraphy of the Leg 15 sites in the Caribbean Sea. In: N.T Edgar, J.B Saunders, et al., (eds.).- deep sea drilling project Initial Reports, Washington D.C 15:475–498
Bolli HM, Saunders JB (1985) Oligocene to Holocene low latitude Planktic foraminifera. In: H.M. Bolli, J.B. Saunders and K. Perch-Nielsen (Eds.), Plankton Stratigraphy: New York, Cambridge University Press pp 155–262
Borsetti AM, Cati F, Colalongo ML, Sartoni S (1979) Biostratigraphy and absolute ages of the Italian Neogene. Ann. Geol. Hellen.7 International Congress Mediterranean Neogene, Athens pp 183–197
Boukhary M, Abd Naby A, Faris M, Morsi A (2012) Plankton stratigraphy of the Early and Middle Miocene Kareem and Rudeis Formations in the central part of the Gulf of Suez, Egypt.- Historical Biology 24(1):49–62
Cherif OH, El-Sheikh H, Mohamed S (1993) Planktonic foraminifera and chronostratigraphy of the Oligo-Miocene in some wells in the isthmus of Suez and the North-Eastern reach of the Nile Delta, Egypt. J Afr Earth Sci 16(4):499–511
Cita MB (1973) Pliocene biostratigraphy and chronostratigraphy. In: W.B.F., RYAN, K.J HS et al. (edits).- Init. Rep. DSDP, Washington D.C 13:1343–1379
Cita MB (1975) The Miocene/Pliocene boundary: history and definition. In: SAITO, T., & BUCKLE, L.H. (edits.): Late Neogene epoch boundaries.- Micropaleontology (Spec. Publ.) 1–30
Cita MB (1976) Planktonic foraminiferal biostratigraphy of the Mediterranean Neogene. Progress in Micropaleontology, Special Publication, Micropaleontology Press, the American Museum of Natural History, New York p 47–68
Cita MB, Silva PI (1968) Evolution of the planktonic foraminiferal assemblages in the stratigraphic interval between the type-Langhian and type-Tortonian and biozonation of the Miocene of Piedmont. Giordano Geologia (2) 35(3):1–39
Colalongo ML, Dondi L, D’Onofrio S, Iaccarino S (1982) Schema biostratigrafico a Foraminiferi per il Pliocene e il basso Pleistocene nell’Appennino settentrionale e nella Pianura Padana. In: Guida alla geologia del margine appenninico padano. G. Cremonini and F. Ricci Lucchi (Eds.) pp 121–122
Cushman JA, Stainforth RM (1945) The Foraminifera of the Cipero Marl Formation of Trinidad, British West Indies. Contrib Cushman Lab For Res 14:3–75
De Heinzelin J, El-Arnauti A (1982) Stratigraphy and geological history of the Sahabi and related formations. Garyounis Sci Bull Spec Issue 4:5–12
Di Stefano A, Foresi LM, Lirer F, Iaccarino SM, Turco E, Amore FO, Mazzei R, Morabito S, Salvatorini G, Aziz HA (2008) Calcareous plankton high-resolution biomagnetostratigraphy for Langhian of the Mediterranean Area. Riv Ital Paleontol Stratigr 114(1):51–76
Duronio P, Dakshe A, Bellini E (1991) Stratigraphy of the offshore Cyrenaica (Libya). Third Symposium on the Geology of Libya. Salem MJ, Hammuda OS, Eliagoubi BA. Elsevier, Amsterdam 4:1589-1620
El Hawat AS, Shelmani MA (1993) Short notes and guidebook on the geology of Al Jabal al Akhdar, Cyrenaica, NE Libya. Earth Sciences Society of Libya (ESSL), Special publication, Tripoli, p 70
Eliagoubi BA, Powell JD (1980) Biostratigraphy and palaeoenvironment of Upper Cretaceous (Maastrichtian) foraminifera of North-central and Northwestern Libya. In: The Geology of Libya, (eds. M. J. Salem and M. T. Busrewil) 1:137–153
Haq BU, Hardenbol J, Vail PR (1988) Mesozoic and Cenozoic chronostratigraphy and cycles of sea-level change. SEPM Spec Publ 42:71–108
Hewaidy AA, Farouk S, Ayyad HM (2012) Nukhul Formation in Wadi Baba, southwest Sinai Peninsula, Egypt. Geoarabia 17(1):103–120
Hewaidy AA, Sallam MM, Khalifa MF (2013) Miocene calcareous foraminifera of the Nile Delta Area, Egypt. Egypt J Paleontol 13:121–171
Hewaidy A, Farouk S, Ayyad HM (2014) Integrated biostratigraphy of the Upper Oligocene-Middle Miocene successions in west-central Sinai, Egypt. J Afr Earth Sci 100:379–400
Hinte JE , Colin, Lehmann R (1991) Micropaleontologic event of the Messinian event at Esso Libya Inc. Well B1-NC35A on the Pelagian Platform. Third Symposium on the Geology of Libya. Salem MJ, Hammuda OS, Eliagoubi BA (eds) Elsevier, Amsterdam 1:205-243
Hooyberghs HJF (1973) Les foraminifères planctoniques de la formation del’oued Hammam, une nouvelle unité lithologique en Tunisie d’âge langhieninférieur. Ann Mines Géol Tunis 26:319–335
Hooyberghs HJF (1977) Stratigraphie Van de Olig–Miocene Pliocene afzettigen in het N.E. Van Tunisie, meteen Bijzondere Studie Van de planktonische Foraminiferen. These. vol. 1. Katholieke Universiteit te Leuven pp 409
Hooyberghs HJF, El Ghali A (1990) Planktonic foraminifers of the Oued Hammam, Aïn Grab, and Mahmoud formations in Central Tunisia.Catalog number: 56 (TUN) Notes duservice Geologique 56:41–67
Hsü KD, Cita MB, Ryan WBF (1973a) The origin of the Mediterranean evaporites. In: W.B.F. Ryan (ed.): Initial Rep. Deep Sea Drill. Proj 13:1201–1231
Hsü KJ, Ryan WBF, Cita MB (1973b) Late Miocene desiccation of the Mediterranean. Nature 242:20–244
Iaccarino SM (1985) Mediterranean Miocene and Pliocene planktic foraminifera. In: Bolli HB, Saunders HM, Perch-Nielsen JB (eds) Plankton Stratigraphy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 283–314
Iaccarino SM, Salvatorini G (1982) A framework of planktonic foraminiferal biostratigraphy for Early Miocene to Late Pliocene Mediterranean area.Paleontology Stratigraphy 2:115–125
Jenkins DG (1966) Planktonic foraminiferal zones and new taxa from the Danian to lower Miocene of New Zealand. NZ J Geol Geophys 8(6):1088–1126
Jenkins DG (1971) New Zealand Cenozoic planktonic foraminifera. N Z Geol Surv Paleontol Bull 42:1–278
Keller G (1980) Planktonic foraminiferal faunas of the equatorial Pacific suggest Early Miocene origin of present oceanic circulation. Mar Micropaleontol 6:269–295
Kennett JP (1973) Middle and Late Cenozoic planktonic foraminiferal biostratigraphy of the southwest pacific- DSDP Leg 21. Initial Report from Deep-sea drilling Projet. 21 pp 575-640
Kennett JP, Srinivasan MS (1983) Neogene planktonic foraminifera. Hutchinson Ross Publishing Company, A phylogenetic Atlas, p 265
Li Q, Zheng F, Liu C (2007) Stratigraphic events across the Oligocene/Miocene boundary. Mar Geol Q Geol 27(5):57–64
Lin J, Zhang J, Jiang S, Wang S, Xu B, Wei M (2004) The Neogene foraminiferal stratigraphy of the LH-19-4-1 borehole, Pearl River Mouth Basin, South China Sea. J Stratigr 28(2):120–125
Mascle G, Mascle J (2019) The Messinian salinity legacy: 50 years later. Mediterr Geosci Rev 1:5–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42990-019-0002-5
Moissette P, Cornée JJ, Mannaï TB, Rabhi MC, André JP, Koskeridou E, Méon H (2010) The western edge of the Mediterranean Pelagian Platform: a Messinian mixed siliciclastic–carbonate ramp in northern Tunisia. Paleogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 285:85–103
Muftah AM (1991) Foraminiferal biostratigraphy and paleoenvironment analysis of the upper cretaceous and lower tertiary sequence of the well A1-41, Sirt Basin, Libya: Masters 1991, University College London, Long-Project Report, London p 100
Muftah AM, Salloum FM, El-Shawaihdi MH, Al-Faitouri MS (2008) A contribution to the stratigraphy of formations of the Sahabi area, Sirt Basin, Libya. In: Boaz NT, El-Arnauti A, Pavlakis P, Salem, MJ (Eds.), Circum Mediterranean geology and biotic evolution during the Neogene period: the perspective from Libya, Garyounis Scientific Bulletin, Special Issue 5:33–45
Ouda Kh, Obaidalla NA (1995) The geological evolution of the Nile Delta area during the Oligocene-Miocene. Egypt J Geol 39(1):77–111
Ouda Kh (1998) Mid-late tertiary foraminiferal events and stratigraphic hiatuses in Egypt. N Jahrbuch Geol Paleontol Abh 209(2):145–215
Riahi S, Soussi M, Boukhalfa K, Ben Ismail-Lattrache K, Stow DAV, Khomsi S, Bedir M (2010) Stratigraphy, sedimentology and structure of the Nu midi a Flysch thrust belt in northern Tunisia. J Afr Earth Sc 57:109–129
Riahi S, Soussi M, Ben Ismail-Lattrache K (2015) Age, Internal stratigraphic architecture and structural style of the Oligocene-Miocene Numidian formation of Northern Tunisia. Ann Soc Geol Pol 85:345–370
Spezzferri S (1994) Planktonic foraminiferal biostratigraphy and taxonomy of the Oligocene and lower Miocene in the oceanic record An Overview. Palaeontogr Ital 81:1–187
Stainforth RM, Lamb JL, Luterbacher HP, Beard JH, Jeffords RM (1975) Cenozoic planktonic foraminiferal zonation and characteristics of index forms. Univ Kansas Paleontol Contrib 62:425
Steininger FE (1994) Proposal for the global stratotype section and point (GSSP) for the base of the Neogene (the Palaeogene/Neogene boundary), International Commission on Stratigraphy, Subcommission on Neogene Stratigraphy; Working Group on the Palaeogene/Neogene Boundary: Vienna, Institute for Paleontology, University of Vienna p 41
Steininger FF, Aubry MP, Berggren WA, Biolzi M, Borsetti AM, Brzobohaty R, Cartlidge JE, Cati F, Cor!eld R, Gelati R, Iacarrino S, Mödden C, Napoleone D, Nolf F, Ottner B, Reichenbacher B, Rögl F, Roetzel R, Spezzaferri S, Tateo F, Villa G, Wielandt U, Zevenboom D, Zorn I (1997) The global stratotype section and point the GSSP for the base of the Neogene (the Paleogene/Neogene boundary). Episodes 20:23–28
Tmalla FA (1996) Latest Maastrichtian to Paleogene planktonic foraminiferal biostratigraphy of well A1a-NC29A, Northern Sirt Basin. Libya. In: The Geology of Sirt Basin. Salem MJ, Mouzughi AJ, Hammuda OS (eds) 2:195–232
Tshakreen SO, Gasiñski MA, Jerzykiewicz T (2002) Late Cretaceous and Early Paleogene foraminiferids of the Western Sirt Basin (WSB, Libya). In: Esseweca Conference, Paleogeographical, Paleoecological, Paleoclimatical Development of Central Europe. Michalik J et al. (eds) pp 83–84
Tshakreen SO, Gasinski MA (2004) Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary problem in Libya: the occurrence of the foraminiferal species Abathomphalus mayaroensis (Bolli) in the Western Sirt Basin. Geol Q 48(1):77–82
Tshakreen SO, Gasinski MA, Machaniec E, Mącznik A (2017) Campanian-Maastrichtian foraminiferal stratigraphy and palaeoenvironment of the Lower Tar Member in the Wadi Tar section, Western Sirte Basin (Libya). Ann Soc Geol Pol 87:349–362
Wade BS, Pearson PN, Berggren WA, Pälike H (2011) Review and revision of Cenozoic tropical planktonic foraminiferal biostratigraphy and calibration to the geomagnetic polarity and astronomical time scale. Earth Sci Rev 104:111–142
Yaakoub NK, Grira C, Mtimet M, Negra MH, Molina E (2017) Planktic foraminiferal biostratigraphy, paleoecology and chronostratigraphy across the Eocene/Oligocene boundary in northern Tunisia. J Afr Earth Sc 125:126–136
Zakaria A, Ela N, Mohamed SA (2019) Biostratigraphy and sequence stratigraphy of the Oligocene succession, offshore Nile Delta, southeastern Mediterranean, Egypt, and its paleoenvironmental implications.- AAPG Bull 103(11):2597–2625
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to the exploration division management of the Arabian Gulf Oil Company (AGOCO) and staff members for their generous help in providing us with all the data required for this work, in specific Mr. Khalifa Ashahomi. The help of the geological laboratory of the Arabian Gulf Oil Company (AGOCO) in preparing the samples is deeply appreciated. Thanks are also extended to the Department of Geoscience at the University of Indiana Pennsylvania in the USA for the SEM Photography of the selected specimens.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Attila Ciner
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hassi, M.F.E., Muftah, A.M., Abdulsamad, E.O. et al. Planktic foraminiferal biostratigraphy of the Oligocene–Pliocene successions in the offshore well A1-89, Sirt Basin, Libya. Arab J Geosci 15, 246 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-09412-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-09412-1