Abstract
Objective
To evaluate the genomic and immune characteristics of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion (ex20ins) mutations from a retrospective dataset with molecular spectrum, tumor mutational burden (TMB), and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, as well as to evaluate the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).
Methods
A total of 283 patients with EGFR ex20ins mutations who were diagnosed with NSCLC at our hospital from August 2013 to September 2020 were enrolled in this single-center retrospective study.
Results
Among the 283 patients with EGFR ex20ins mutations, 182 patients received next-generation sequencing (NGS) test, and 51 different subtypes of insertion variants were recorded. The most common mutations were A767_V769dup (21.4%), S768_D770dup (19.2%) and A763_Y764insFQEA (7.1%). The most common co-occurring mutations were EGFR amplification (37.9%), TP53 mutation (35.0%) and PIK3CA mutation (8.7%). PD-L1 status was available for 141 patients, and 75.9% (107/141) of these samples showed negative PD-L1 expression. In the 36 cases with TMB tested by NGS, the median TMB was 4.6 mutations/Mb. Then 12 patients received ICIs monotherapy or combination therapy. No severe adverse events were observed.
Conclusion
Low PD-L1 expression and TMB were observed in NSCLC patients harboring EGFR ex20ins mutations. Further investigations are needed to confirm the therapeutic sensitivity of ICIs in this subgroup of EGFR mutations.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The advance in our understanding of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) superfamily has led to the development of molecular subgroups of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and novel therapies besides traditional surgery and chemoradiotherapy [1]. As for EGFR gene mutations, the deletion of the inner frame in exon 19 and a point mutation (L858R) in exon 21 are the most commonly EGFR activating mutations which account for 85% of patients with EGFR mutations [2]. Both mutations confer high sensitivity to small-molecule EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) such as erlotinib, gefitinib, afatinib, osimertinib, and dacomitinib [2]. Currently, approximately 8.2% of EGFR mutations in NSCLC are classified as uncommon subtypes, such as G719X, L861Q, S768I and EGFR exon 20 insertions (ex20ins), and their outcomes are not quite the same [3, 4]. Ex20ins mutations account for up to 4% of all EGFR mutations [5] and define a distinct subset of lung adenocarcinoma, which are characterized by a poor response to the first and second-generation EGFR TKIs such as gefitinib, erlotinib and afatinib [5,6,7,8], with a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 2.7 months and a median overall survival of 9.2 months [7]. Therefore, the development of an EGFR TKI that can more effectively target NSCLC with EGFR ex20ins mutations is of paramount importance. Osimertinib and novel EGFR inhibitors such as Mobocertinib (TAK788) or poziotinib have demonstrated pre-clinical activity in vitro against EGFR ex20ins [9,10,11]. Furthermore, they have been reported clinical activity and efficacy in this uncommon mutation subtype [12,13,14]. Up to now, only EGFR/c-Met double anti-rybrevant (amivantamab-VMJW, JNJ-6732) has been accelerated approval for the treatment of NSCLC patients harboring EGFR ex20ins mutations who have progressed after platinum-based chemotherapy by the U.S. FDA [15]. However, as the first-line treatment, conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy might be a better option for this mutation similar to the treatment of EGFR wild-type NSCLC [2, 16]. Therefore, in addition to molecular targeted drugs, it is very important to determine the clinical characteristics and new treatment strategies of these patients.
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have dramatically changed the therapeutic landscape for patients with NSCLC, especially those without sensitizing EGFR mutations or ALK translocations [17,18,19]. However, patients with EGFR positive NSCLC do not derive a significant benefit from ICIs therapy [20,21,22]. Furthermore, it is unclear whether such treatment is also without benefit in patients with uncommon EGFR mutations including EGFR ex20ins [3]. The EGFR exon 20 mutation (T790M excluded) patients demonstrated relatively higher PFS and objective response rate (ORR) to immunotherapy than those with common EGFR (PFS: 4.0 vs. 1.9 months; ORR: 19% vs. 0%; P < 0.05) [23]. While a real-world data from China do not suggest additional clinical benefit of ICIs for EGFR ex20ins mutations [24]. Since only a subset of patients with lung cancer respond to ICIs, it is necessary to develop clinically practical tools to identify the subset of patients most likely to derive clinical benefit [25]. The Food and Drug Administration has approved programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression as predictive biomarker in NSCLC [17], whereas EGFR mutation appears to be a negative predictive factor [25, 26]. Tumor mutational burden (TMB) is also a predictive biomarker in several tumor types including NSCLC patients treated with ICIs [25].
Evidence about the efficacy of ICIs in NSCLC harboring EGFR ex20ins mutations is scarce [3, 26]. Therefore, it is important to further explore the clinical features and treatment response of such patients. Hence, this study was designed to evaluate the genomic and immune characteristics of NSCLC patients with EGFR ex20ins mutations from a retrospective dataset with molecular spectrum, TMB, and PD-L1 expression, as well as to evaluate the efficacy of ICIs.
Materials and methods
Patients
A total of 283 patients with EGFR ex20ins mutations who were diagnosed with NSCLC at our hospital from August 2013 to September 2020 were enrolled in this retrospective study. The patients’ clinical data were obtained from electronic medical record database, including age, gender, histological subtype, the levels of PD‐L1 expression in tumors, genomic status, TMB, disease stage, ECOG score and smoking status. The tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging at diagnosis was classified using version 8th of the TNM staging system. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University.
The median age of the patients was 59 years old, with a range of 25–90 years old. Among them, 130 patients (45.9%) were male and 153 patients (54.1%) were female. In addition, 70 patients (24.7%) were smokers, and 200 patients (70.7%) were non-smokers. Furthermore, 220 patients (77.7%) had a good Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (score 0 or 1) at the onset of the disease. Histological examination revealed that the cohort consisted of 94.0% (266/283) adenocarcinoma samples and 6.0% (17/283) non-adenocarcinoma samples. Meanwhile, 76 patients (26.8%) were diagnosed with stage I–II, 190 patients (67.1%) were diagnosed with stage III–IV, while the stage of 17 patients (6.0%) were not documented. Clinical demographics of this cohort was shown in Table 1.
Genomic analysis
Over the course of time of this study, 184 patients received targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) to determine the genomic status by physician’s choices, and the tumor specimen of the remaining 99 patients were tested by real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) through direct sequencing of EGFR from exon 18 to exon 21 by physician’s choices. TMB was tested by NGS in 36 individuals which was characterized as the number of somatic base substitution or indel alterations per megabase (Mb) per previously described method [27].
Tumor PD‐L1 analysis
Tumor tissues from core biopsies, surgically resected samples, or cytological specimens were used to perform PD-L1 immunohistochemistry testing. PD-L1 immunohistochemistry was graded by a tumor proportion score (TPS) system. PD-L1 TPS, which is the percentage of tumor cells showing partial or complete membrane staining, was calculated.
Immunotherapy
Outcomes from ICIs (Pembrolizumab, Nivolumab, Camrelizumab, Sintilimab or Toripalimab) as single agents or in combination with chemotherapy or angiogenesis inhibitor were captured. Efficacy of ICIs based on the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 was evaluated. The adverse events were evaluated according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.03).
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS® software, version 25 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA). Descriptive statistics summarized the patients’ characteristics including the median, frequency, and percentage for categorical variables. The Chi square test was used to compare categorical characteristics. When P < 0.05, the difference was statistically significant.
Results
Genomic analysis
Over the course of time of this study, all the patients received targeted NGS or RT-PCR by physician’s choices. Of note, 182 patients had specific and available data of amino acid sequence changes by NGS testing, while 2 patients had no available data of amino acid sequence changes by NGS. The remaining 99 patients had unknown amino acid sequence changes because insertion mutations were identified just by RT-PCR testing. A total of 51 different subtypes of insertion variants were recorded (Fig. 1). Most commonly were A767_V769dup (39/182, 21.4%), S768_D770dup (35/182, 19.2%), A763_Y764insFQEA (13/182, 7.1%), H773_V774insAH (8/182, 4.4%) and N771_H773dup (8/182, 4.4%) (Fig. 2). Among the 103 EGFR ex20ins cases with co-occurring genetic alterations, EGFR amplifications were the most common genetic alterations and were detected in 37.9% (39/103) of the samples. TP53 alterations were detected in 35.0% (36/103) of the samples. PIK3CA mutations were detected in 8.7% (9/103) of the tested samples. MET amplification mutations were detected in 6.8% (7/103) of the tested samples (Fig. 3). Of note, among all patients, three patients harbored additional EGFR activating mutations (2 of EGFR 19del and 1 of EGFR L858R).
PD-L1expression and TMB
PD-L1 was found to be located on the membrane of tumor cells. PD-L1 status was available for 141 patients. In this study, membrane PD-L1 expression on tumor cells was defined by TPSs of ≤ 1%, 1%–49%, and ≥ 50%, respectively. In addition, 75.9% (107/141) of the samples showed negative PD-L1 expression, and 24.1% (34/141) of the NSCLC patients showed positive PD-L1 expression including two cases with a PD-L1 TPS of less than 1%. Moreover, 23 cases showed PD-L1 TPS of 1%-49%, 5 cases showed PD-L1 TPS of no less than 50%, and 4 cases with positive PD-L1 expression showed no detailed percentage. There were no significant differences between PD-L1 expression and clinical parameters including age, gender, smoking status, ECOG score, histological subtype or TNM stage (P > 0.05; Table 2). In the 36 cases with TMB tested by NGS, the average TMB of EGFR ex20ins was low (mean 5.3, median 4.6, range between 0.8 and 13.8 mutations/Mb), among which only 2 cases were more than 10 mutations/Mb [1].
Outcomes and adverse events with ICIs
The treatment information was collected until December 2020. Of the 283 patients with EGFR ex20ins mutations of NSCLC, 12 patients received ICIs monotherapy or combined with other agents (chemotherapy or angiogenesis inhibitor) when the disease developed into stage IV (Sintilimab n = 7, Camrelizumab n = 2, Toripalimab n = 2, Pembrolizumab n = 1). Three patients received ICIs as first-line therapy, six patients received ICIs as second-line therapy, and all these patients received platinum-based chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab as a first-line drug treatment. Three patients received ICIs as more than third-line therapy. All these three patients received at least one cytotoxic chemotherapy regimen including platinum-based chemotherapy with or without angiogenesis inhibitor (bevacizumab or anlotinib) as prior treatment. Among these three patients, two individuals received EGFR-TKI after chemotherapy, including one treated with osimertinib (P11) and one treated with poziotinib (P12) (Table 3). Among the 12 patients treated with ICIs, no patients achieved complete response, 2 patients achieved partial response, 8 patients achieved stable disease, 1 patient achieved progressive disease, and 1 patient was unevaluable when treated with ICIs (Fig. 4). The PFS ranged from 1.5 months to 5 months. Grade 1 reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation occurred in one patient, and immune-related adverse events of all grades of other patients were not documented in the electronic medical record database.
Discussion
In this study, the largest known dataset of EGFR ex20ins NSCLC of 283 cases were presented. In terms of clinical characteristics, the majority of these patients (67.1%) were at advanced stage III–IV when they were diagnosed. EGFR ex20ins appeared to be associated with non-smoking status. This is in line with the study of Wu et al. that uncommon EGFR mutations are more common among never-smokers [5].
Among the 182 patients received NGS test with recorded subtypes of insertion variants, we identified 51 unique molecular subtypes of EGFR ex20ins while Riess et al. identified 64 unique subtypes who reported 263 cases of EGFR ex20ins from the Foundation Medicine Inc database [27]. The most frequently molecular subtypes occurring were A767_V769dup (21.4%) and S768_D770dup (19.2%) represent about 40% of all detected EGFR ex20ins variants in our series, the frequency of these two subtypes was similar with Riess’s study [27]. EGFR ex20ins mutations induce a steric hindrance of the drug-binding pocket, which prevents binding of EGFR TKI [28]. However, not all EGFR ex20ins mutations have the same degree of resistance, and based on preclinical and clinical data, EGFR ex20ins A763_Y7764insFQEA is generally considered the unique variant sensitive to first or second generation EGFR TKI [27, 29]. This mutation was the third most common molecular subtype and comprised 7.1% (13/182) of all EGFR ex20ins in this study. These data suggested that knowledge of the specific EGFR ex20ins variant might have potential clinical implications for making treatment decisions and promote the exploration of efficacy of conventional TKI or even potent newer generation EGFR TKIs.
Although almost all EGFR ex20ins mutations are mutually exclusive with other mutations, in our dataset, more than half of (103/182) patients tested by NGS had co-existing genetic alterations [28]. EGFR amplification was the most common co-occurring mutation in this study like Riess’s report [27]. TP53 alteration was the second most common co-mutation detected in 35.0% (36/103) of the samples, which indicated a decreased efficacy of EGFR TKI in NSCLC patients [30]. Some series have reported co-occurring genomic alterations affecting mutations in CDKN2A and CDKN2B (22% and 16%, respectively), NKX2-1 (14%), RB1 (11%) [27] and PIK3CA [24, 31, 32]. While those above co-existing genetic alterations were tested with less than 10% of our samples. Of note, 3 (3/103, 3%) patients were detected with EGFR 19del or 21 L858R mutation in this study. Similarly, only 0.6% of Chinese NSCLC patients harboring EGFR ex20ins had co-occurrence of a common sensitizing EGFR mutations in a real-world study [24]. However, one cohort in Hispanic patients reported that up to one-third of EGFR ex20ins NSCLC shared a common EGFR sensitizing mutation, which conferred a better prognosis [32]. The information of different EGFR ex20ins variants and different co-mutations indicated the different efficacy to EGFR TKI, thus we need further and arduous exploration to overcome the resistance. Despite the complexity and limitations, results from clinical trials with selective EGFR ex20ins TKI have been eagerly awaited and they represent an important progress towards the identification of an effective therapeutic option for NSCLC patients with EGFR ex20ins, an area of high unmet medical need [28].
Besides the progress of EGFR TKI, ICI with PD-1 or PD-L1 antibodies has revolutionized the treatment of NSCLC and improved survival outcomes for many lung cancer patients [17]. PD-L1 expression and TMB are the most studied and validated predictive biomarkers that respond to ICIs [33]. Higher PD-L1 expression in tumor cells is correlated with higher response rate to anti–PD-1/PD-L1 therapy in NSCLC [26]. In this study, PD-L1 expression was positive in 24.1% (34/141) samples, which was lower than Chen et al. of 49.0% (24/49) thatin tumor cells of EGFR ex20ins [3]. Furthermore, the PD-L1 positive expression (24.1%) of EGFR ex20ins was higher than that of mutant-type EGFR (18.4%) but lower than that of wild-type EGFR (39.1%) [34]. The positive PD-L1 expression in EGFR ex20ins lung tumors ranges from 1 to 90%. Although majority patients’ PD-L1 expression were negative, high PD-L1 expression (≥ 50%) occurred in five cases were also discovered. In addition to PD-L1 expression, TMB also appears to be associated with clinical benefit to PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies, potentially relating to an increase in neoantigen specific T-cell activity [27]. In the limited number of 36 patients with TMB testing, the median TMB was as low as 4.6 mutations/Mb, which was higher than that of common sensitizing EGFR mutations (3.6/Mb), while lower than that of wild-type EGFR patients (8.1/Mb) [35]. Smoking is associated with increased mutation load of multiple distinct mutational signatures in different cancers types including lung adenocarcinoma [36]. Low TMB of EGFR ex20ins in this study likely reflected non-tobacco associated carcinogenesis, while there was no significant correlation between PD-L1 expression and smoking status. Although low PD-L1 expression [18, 19] or low TMB [37] in the presence of oncogenic driver mutations should not preclude ICI efficacy, it suggests comparable lack of benefit to single agent PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies in EGFR ex20ins NSCLC, as in NSCLC harboring more common EGFR mutations, maybe combination with other agents such as chemotherapy or angiogenesis inhibitor is an effective therapeutic strategy.
In the 283 cases, only limited 12 patients received ICIs or combined with chemotherapy or angiogenesis inhibitor. However, this is the largest reported dataset of EGFRex20ins NSCLC who received ICIs. Conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy was still the main therapy of these 12 patients. Tumor regression of only two patients who received combined ICIs as first-line therapy achieved partial response. In the remaining nine patients who received ICIs as second-line therapy or more than second-line therapy, the tumor size was not significantly reduced. Eight patients achieved stable disease, and one patient achieved progressive disease. This indicated a better effect on objective response for combined treatment naive than previously treated patients [19, 38]. As for adverse events, no severe immune related adverse events or super-progression were observed, so ICIs may be a choice for EGFR ex20ins’ patients. Due to the small sample size and heterogeneous regimens, additional studies are necessary to further evaluate the efficacy of ICIs in the EGFR exon20ins population. Maybe combination therapy is better, indeed it remains unknown whether ICI monotherapy or in combination could be suitable in this subset of patients as EGFR mutant tumors were excluded from randomized phase III clinical trials assessing the role of ICIs in first-line setting of advanced NSCLC patients [19, 39].
There are still some limitations in this study. As a retrospective analysis, the number of patients received ICIs was limited and immunotherapy regimens of patients were heterogeneous. Moreover, information about PD-L1 expression and TMB of every patient who received ICIs were inadequate, and we did not analyze the value of PD-L1 expression and TMB in guiding the application of ICIs. Whether the different subtypes of insertion variants or co-existing genetic alterations will affect the efficacy of immunotherapy is also need to be determined. Hence, future prospective investigation is necessary to explore the best time or mode of ICIs and biomarkers for EGFR ex20ins NSCLC patients.
Data availability
All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
Sridhar SS, Seymour L, Shepherd FA. Inhibitors of epidermal-growth-factor receptors: a review of clinical research with a focus on non-small-cell lung cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2003;4:397–406.
Ettinger DS, Wood DE, Aisner DL, Akerley W, Bauman J, Chirieac LR, D’Amico TA, DeCamp MM, Dilling TJ, Dobelbower M, Doebele RC, Govindan R, Gubens MA, Hennon M, Horn L, Komaki R, Lackner RP, Lanuti M, Leal TA, Leisch LJ, Lilenbaum R, Lin J, Loo BW Jr, Martins R, Otterson GA, Reckamp K, Riely GJ, Schild SE, Shapiro TA, Stevenson J, Swanson SJ, Tauer K, Yang SC, Gregory K, Hughes M. Non-small cell lung cancer, version 5.2017 NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2017;15:504–35.
Chen K, Cheng G, Zhang F, Zhu G, Xu Y, Yu X, Huang Z, Fan Y. PD-L1 expression and T cells infiltration in patients with uncommon EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer and the response to immunotherapy. Lung Cancer. 2020;142:98–105.
De Pas T, Toffalorio F, Manzotti M, Fumagalli C, Spitaleri G, Catania C, Delmonte A, Giovannini M, Spaggiari L, de Braud F, Barberis M. Activity of epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with non-small cell lung cancer harboring rare epidermal growth factor receptor mutations. J Thorac Oncol. 2011;6:1895–901.
Wu JY, Yu CJ, Chang YC, Yang CH, Shih JY, Yang PC. Effectiveness of tyrosine kinase inhibitors on “uncommon” epidermal growth factor receptor mutations of unknown clinical significance in non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17:3812–21.
Yasuda H, Kobayashi S, Costa DB. EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations in non-small-cell lung cancer: preclinical data and clinical implications. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13:e23–31.
Yang JC, Sequist LV, Geater SL, Tsai CM, Mok TS, Schuler M, Yamamoto N, Yu CJ, Ou SH, Zhou C, Massey D, Zazulina V, Wu YL. Clinical activity of afatinib in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring uncommon EGFR mutations: a combined post-hoc analysis of LUX-Lung 2, LUX-Lung 3, and LUX-Lung 6. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:830–8.
Kuiper JL, Hashemi SMS, Thunnissen E, Snijders PJF, Grünberg K, Bloemena E, Sie D, Postmus PE, Heideman DAM, Smit EF. Non-classic EGFR mutations in a cohort of Dutch EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients and outcomes following EGFR-TKI treatment. Br J Cancer. 2016;115:1504–12.
Floc’h N, Martin MJ, Riess JW, Orme JP, Staniszewska AD, Ménard L, Cuomo ME, O’Neill DJ, Ward RA, Finlay MRV, McKerrecher D, Cheng M, Vang DP, Burich RA, Keck JG, Gandara DR, Mack PC, Cross DAE. Antitumor activity of osimertinib, an irreversible mutant-selective EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in NSCLC Harboring EGFR Exon 20 insertions. Mol Cancer Ther. 2018;17:885–96.
Robichaux JP, Elamin YY, Tan Z, Carter BW, Zhang S, Liu S, Li S, Chen T, Poteete A, Estrada-Bernal A, Le AT, Truini A, Nilsson MB, Sun H, Roarty E, Goldberg SB, Brahmer JR, Altan M, Lu C, Papadimitrakopoulou V, Politi K, Doebele RC, Wong KK, Heymach JV. Mechanisms and clinical activity of an EGFR and HER2 exon 20-selective kinase inhibitor in non-small cell lung cancer. Nat Med. 2018;24:638–46.
Gonzalvez F, Vincent S, Baker TE, Gould AE, Li S, Wardwell SD, Nadworny S, Ning Y, Zhang S, Huang WS, Hu Y, Li F, Greenfield MT, Zech SG, Das B, Narasimhan NI, Clackson T, Dalgarno D, Shakespeare WC, Fitzgerald M, Chouitar J, Griffin RJ, Liu S, Wong KK, Zhu X, Rivera VM. Mobocertinib (TAK-788): a targeted inhibitor of EGFR Exon 20 insertion mutants in non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Discov. 2021;11:1672–87.
van Veggel B, Santos JFVMR, Hashemi SMS, Paats MS, Monkhorst K, Heideman DAM, Groves M, Radonic T, Smit EF, Schuuring E, van der Wekken AJ, de Langen AJ. Osimertinib treatment for patients with EGFR exon 20 mutation positive non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2020;141:9–13.
Heymach J, Negrão M, Robichaux J, Carter BW. A Phase II Trial of Poziotinib in EGFR and HER2 exon 20 mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). J Thorac Oncol. 2018;13:S323–4.
Riely GJ, Neal JW, Camidge DR, Spira AI, Piotrowska Z, Costa DB, Tsao AS, Patel JD, Gadgeel SM, Bazhenova L, Zhu VW, West HL, Mekhail T, Gentzler RD, Nguyen D, Vincent S, Zhang S, Lin J, Bunn V, Jin S, Li S, Jänne PA. Activity and safety of mobocertinib (TAK-788) in previously treated non-small cell lung cancer with EGFR Exon 20 insertion mutations from a phase I/II trial. Cancer Discov. 2021;11:1688–99.
Syed YY. Amivantamab: first approval. Drugs. 2021;81:1349–53.
Zhang T, Wan B, Zhao Y, Li C, Liu H, Lv T, Zhan P, Song Y. Treatment of uncommon EGFR mutations in non-small cell lung cancer: new evidence and treatment. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2019;8:302–16.
Reck M, Rodríguez-Abreu D, Robinson AG, Hui R, Csőszi T, Fülöp A, Gottfried M, Peled N, Tafreshi A, Cuffe S, O’Brien M, Rao S, Hotta K, Leiby MA, Lubiniecki GM, Shentu Y, Rangwala R, Brahmer JR. Pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy for PD-L1-positive non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:1823–33.
Gandhi L, Rodríguez-Abreu D, Gadgeel S, Esteban E, Felip E, De Angelis F, Domine M, Clingan P, Hochmair MJ, Powell SF, Cheng SY, Bischoff HG, Peled N, Grossi F, Jennens RR, Reck M, Hui R, Garon EB, Boyer M, Rubio-Viqueira B, Novello S, Kurata T, Gray JE, Vida J, Wei Z, Yang J, Raftopoulos H, Pietanza MC, Garassino MC. Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:2078–92.
Gadgeel S, Rodríguez-Abreu D, Speranza G, Esteban E, Felip E, Dómine M, Hui R, Hochmair MJ, Clingan P, Powell SF, Cheng SY, Bischoff HG, Peled N, Grossi F, Jennens RR, Reck M, Garon EB, Novello S, Rubio-Viqueira B, Boyer M, Kurata T, Gray JE, Yang J, Bas T, Pietanza MC, Garassino MC. Updated analysis from KEYNOTE-189: pembrolizumab or placebo plus pemetrexed and platinum for previously untreated metastatic nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38:1505–17.
Rittmeyer A, Barlesi F, Waterkamp D, Park K, Ciardiello F, von Pawel J, Gadgeel SM, Hida T, Kowalski DM, Dols MC, Cortinovis DL, Leach J, Polikoff J, Barrios C, Kabbinavar F, Frontera OA, De Marinis F, Turna H, Lee JS, Ballinger M, Kowanetz M, He P, Chen DS, Sandler A, Gandara DR. Atezolizumab versus docetaxel in patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (OAK): a phase 3, open-label, multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2017;389:255–65.
Lee CK, Man J, Lord S, Links M, Gebski V, Mok T, Yang JC. Checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer-a meta-analysis. J Thorac Oncol. 2017;12:403–7.
Borghaei H, Paz-Ares L, Horn L, Spigel DR, Steins M, Ready NE, Chow LQ, Vokes EE, Felip E, Holgado E, Barlesi F, Kohlhäufl M, Arrieta O, Burgio MA, Fayette J, Lena H, Poddubskaya E, Gerber DE, Gettinger SN, Rudin CM, Rizvi N, Crinò L, Blumenschein GR Jr, Antonia SJ, Dorange C, Harbison CT, Graf Finckenstein F, Brahmer JR. Nivolumab versus docetaxel in advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:1627–39.
Negrao M, Reuben A, Robichaux JP, Le X, Nilsson M, Wu T, Zhang JH, Landry L, Roarty E, Rinsurongkawong W, Swisher S, Simon GR, Futreal A, Glisson BS, Zhang JJ, Heymach J. Association of EGFR and HER-2 exon 20 mutations with distinct patterns of response to immune checkpoint blockade in non-small cell lung cancer. J Cli Oncol. 2018;36:9052.
Yang G, Li J, Xu H, Yang Y, Yang L, Xu F, Xia B, Zhu VW, Nagasaka M, Yang Y, Li Y, Qiu W, Ying J, Ou SI, Wang Y. EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations in Chinese advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients: Molecular heterogeneity and treatment outcome from nationwide real-world study. Lung Cancer. 2020;145:186–94.
Rizvi H, Sanchez-Vega F, La K, Chatila W, Jonsson P, Halpenny D, Plodkowski A, Long N, Sauter JL, Rekhtman N, Hollmann T, Schalper KA, Gainor JF, Shen R, Ni A, Arbour KC, Merghoub T, Wolchok J, Snyder A, Chaft JE, Kris MG, Rudin CM, Socci ND, Berger MF, Taylor BS, Zehir A, Solit DB, Arcila ME, Ladanyi M, Riely GJ, Schultz N, Hellmann MD. Molecular determinants of response to anti-programmed cell death (PD)-1 and anti-programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) blockade in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer profiled with targeted next-generation sequencing. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:633–41.
Herbst RS, Baas P, Kim DW, Felip E, Pérez-Gracia JL, Han JY, Molina J, Kim JH, Arvis CD, Ahn MJ, Majem M, Fidler MJ, de Castro G, Garrido M, Lubiniecki GM, Shentu Y, Im E, Dolled-Filhart M, Garon EB. Pembrolizumab versus docetaxel for previously treated, PD-L1-positive, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (KEYNOTE-010): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016;387:1540–50.
Riess JW, Gandara DR, Frampton GM, Madison R, Peled N, Bufill JA, Dy GK, Ou SI, Stephens PJ, McPherson JD, Lara PN Jr, Burich RA, Ross JS, Miller VA, Ali SM, Mack PC, Schrock AB. Diverse EGFR Exon 20 insertions and co-occurring molecular alterations identified by comprehensive genomic profiling of NSCLC. J Thorac Oncol. 2018;13:1560–8.
Remon J, Hendriks LEL, Cardona AF, Besse B. EGFR exon 20 insertions in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a new history begins. Cancer Treat Rev. 2020;90:102105.
Yasuda H, Park E, Yun CH, Sng NJ, Lucena-Araujo AR, Yeo WL, Huberman MS, Cohen DW, Nakayama S, Ishioka K, Yamaguchi N, Hanna M, Oxnard GR, Lathan CS, Moran T, Sequist LV, Chaft JE, Riely GJ, Arcila ME, Soo RA, Meyerson M, Eck MJ, Kobayashi SS, Costa DB. Structural, biochemical, and clinical characterization of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion mutations in lung cancer. Sci Transl Med. 2013;5:216ra177.
Aggarwal C, Davis CW, Mick R, Thompson JC, Ahmed S, Jeffries S, Bagley S, Gabriel P, Evans TL, Bauml JM, Ciunci C, Alley E, Morrissette JJD, Cohen RB, Carpenter EL, Langer CJ. Influence of TP53 mutation on survival in pateints with advanced EGFR-Mutant non-small-cell lung cancer. JCO Precis Oncol. 2018;2018:PO.18.00107.
Arcila ME, Nafa K, Chaft JE, Rekhtman N, Lau C, Reva BA, Zakowski MF, Kris MG, Ladanyi M. EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations in lung adenocarcinomas: prevalence, molecular heterogeneity, and clinicopathologic characteristics. Mol Cancer Ther. 2013;12:220–9.
Cardona AF, Rojas L, Zatarain-Barrón ZL, Freitas HC, Granados ST, Castillo O, Oblitas G, Corrales L, Castro CD, Ruiz-Patiño A, Martín C, Pérez MA, González L, Chirinos L, Vargas C, Carranza H, Otero J, Rodriguez J, Rodriguez J, Archila P, Lema M, Acosta Madiedo J, Karachaliu N, Wills B, Pino LE, de Lima V, Rosell R, Arrieta O. EGFR exon 20 insertion in lung adenocarcinomas among Hispanics (geno12-CLICaP). Lung Cancer. 2018;125:265–72.
Negrao MV, Lam VK, Reuben A, Rubin ML, Landry LL, Roarty EB, Rinsurongkawong W, Lewis J, Roth JA, Swisher SG, Gibbons DL, Wistuba II, Papadimitrakopoulou V, Glisson BS, Blumenschein GR Jr, Lee JJ, Heymach JV, Zhang J. PD-L1 expression, tumor mutational burden, and cancer gene mutations are stronger predictors of benefit from immune checkpoint blockade than HLA class I genotype in non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2019;14:1021–31.
Takada K, Toyokawa G, Tagawa T, Kohashi K, Shimokawa M, Akamine T, Takamori S, Hirai F, Shoji F, Okamoto T, Oda Y, Maehara Y. PD-L1 expression according to the EGFR status in primary lung adenocarcinoma. Lung Cancer. 2018;116:1–6.
Chen K, Pan G, Cheng G, Zhang F, Xu Y, Huang Z, Fan Y. Immune microenvironment features and efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in non-small cell lung cancer patients with EGFR or HER2 exon 20 insertions. Thorac Cancer. 2021;12:218–26.
Alexandrov LB, Ju YS, Haase K, Van Loo P, Martincorena I, Nik-Zainal S, Totoki Y, Fujimoto A, Nakagawa H, Shibata T, Campbell PJ, Vineis P, Phillips DH, Stratton MR. Mutational signatures associated with tobacco smoking in human cancer. Science. 2016;354:618–22.
Vokes N, Jimenez Alguilar E, Adeni A, Umeton R, Sholl L, Rizvi H, Hellmann M, Awad M, Van Allen E. Efficacy and genomic correlates of response to anti-PD1/PD-L1 blockade in non-small cell lung cancers harboring targetable oncogenes. J Thoracic Oncol. 2018;13:S422.
Leighl NB, Hellmann MD, Hui R, Carcereny E, Felip E, Ahn MJ, Eder JP, Balmanoukian AS, Aggarwal C, Horn L, Patnaik A, Gubens M, Ramalingam SS, Lubiniecki GM, Zhang J, Piperdi B, Garon EB. Pembrolizumab in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (KEYNOTE-001): 3-year results from an open-label, phase 1 study. Lancet Respir Med. 2019;7:347–57.
Mok TSK, Wu YL, Kudaba I, Kowalski DM, Cho BC, Turna HZ, Castro G Jr, Srimuninnimit V, Laktionov KK, Bondarenko I, Kubota K, Lubiniecki GM, Zhang J, Kush D, Lopes G. Pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy for previously untreated, PD-L1-expressing, locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (KEYNOTE-042): a randomised, open-label, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2019;393:1819–30.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
Funding information is not applicable.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
DG and XL designed the study and prepared the first draft of the paper. XL is guarantor. QG and SH contributed to the acquisition of the data. HZ and SG were responsible for statistical analysis of the data. QG and SH were responsible for interpretation of data. All authors revised the paper critically for intellectual content and approved the final version. All authors agree to be accountable for the work and to ensure that any questions relating to the accuracy and integrity of the paper are investigated and properly resolved.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethics approval
The study received the support of the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Geng, D., Guo, Q., Huang, S. et al. Clinical and molecular characteristics of epidermal growth factor receptor exon 20 insertion mutations in non-small-cell lung cancer. Clin Transl Oncol 24, 379–387 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-021-02701-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-021-02701-x