Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Correction to: Neuroinformatics (2023) 21:549–563
The original version of this article unfortunately contained mistakes.
NiftyMIC, MIALSRTK and SVRTK comparison in terms of fetal brain reconstructions quality. Each bar and whisker represent the average and standard deviation consensus among the two raters’ assessments for each quality scale (bad, poor, acceptable, and excellent), respectively
The original article has been corrected.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The online version of the original article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1007/s12021-023-09635-5.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Ciceri, T., Squarcina, L., Pigoni, A. et al. Correction to: Geometric Reliability of Super-Resolution Reconstructed Images from Clinical Fetal MRI in the Second Trimester. Neuroinform 21, 669 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12021-023-09642-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12021-023-09642-6