Process improvement efforts across the entire continuum of surgical care are accelerating due to the continued shift from traditional fee-for-service to episode-based payment. Notably for orthopaedics, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) recently implemented the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) model in 67 metropolitan areas in the United States [3]. The CJR model involves reimbursement over the entire episode of care—from the decision to operate, to the acute perioperative phase, and throughout postdischarge recovery. The goal of this CMS pilot is to improve the value of care delivered (defined as outcomes that matter to patients per healthcare dollar spent) for its beneficiaries undergoing primary total hip or knee replacement [8]. Hospitals participating in CJR are accountable for patient outcomes and costs over the entire episode of surgical care, starting at the time of the anchor hospital admission and ending 90 days after the initial hospital discharge.

In response to this major process improvement opportunity, we developed the Preoperative Assessment and Global Optimization (PASS-GO) [12] program, which delivers integrated and coordinated care across the entire surgical care continuum, from before surgery throughout at least the initial 90 days postdischarge. Briefly, our nascent PASS-GO program seeks to improve value by identifying and addressing patient risk factors prior to total joint replacement surgery. The PASS-GO program has evolved to include a focus on reducing complications and unplanned escalation of care after surgery and hospital discharge. We can accomplish this by implementing direct patient care touch points—occurring after hospital discharge—by a nurse navigator in our telemedicine-based Command Center (Fig. 1). As such, we have renamed the program Perioperative Assessment and Global Optimization.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The incorporation of the Perioperative Assessment and Global Optimization (PASS-GO) Clinic and Transitions across Levels of Care (TLC) Service within the perioperative surgical home model. (Published with permission from Thomas R. Vetter MD, MPH).

Poor coordination of care, along with inadequate communication both among providers and with patients and families, can result in provider and/or patient deviations from standardized clinical care pathways [2, 5]. These care deviations are especially likely during transitions of care, and can lead to avoidable emergency department visits and hospital readmissions. Improving transitional care, defined as “a set of actions designed to ensure the coordination and continuity of healthcare as patients transfer between different locations or different levels of care within the same location” [2, 5], can reduce these potential events and improve the healthcare experience for patients and their families [11].

To improve coordination and outcomes across the entire total joint replacement episode of care, our healthcare system is also introducing a novel perioperative Transitions across Levels of Care (TLC) Service. This TLC Service expands upon our existing conventional, internal medicine-based inpatient comanagement services by promoting greater collaboration, communication, and teamwork among the surgeon, anesthesiologist, hospitalist, intensivist, and other key members of the healthcare team [13], particularly during transitions across all the elements (Fig. 2) of perioperative care.

Fig. 2
figure 2

The Transitions across Levels of Care (TLC) Service seeks to promote enhanced coordination of care and communication within all the elements of the entire perioperative continuum of care. (Published with permission from Thomas R. Vetter MD, MPH).

Just like our PASS-GO Program [12], our TLC Service involves substantial process of care reengineering, demands leadership in change management, and requires additional human and operational resources. While these initiatives have worked in our setting because of a commitment to developing a learning health system model that is focused on optimizing value delivered to patients, the principles in play here are generalizable elsewhere because they have been developed and piloted in a variety of different practice settings [1, 4, 9].

Our TLC Service focuses on our preoperatively identified sicker, frailer, higher risk, and more socioeconomically vulnerable patients. The specific goals of our TLC Service include: (1) Reducing complications by meeting the greater, complex care needs of these higher intensity patients, (2) fewer avoidable emergency department visits and hospital readmissions, (3) more judicious, and thus cost-effective, use of postacute care facilities and services, including a skilled nursing facility, inpatient rehabilitation facility, or long-term acute care hospital, and (4) an overall improved patient and family experience.

This novel service relies upon frequent interdisciplinary team huddles [10] to assure better communication and direct information transfer (hand-offs) among care providers [7], and to more consistently convey patient and family member questions and concerns to the surgeon. It applies standardized criteria for discharge to each level of postacute care and a corresponding, preferred local facility; the service then reinforces and tracks this mutually agreed upon patient trajectory. It also facilitates timely access to, and consistently correct use of, prescribed acute and chronic medications before and after discharge.

Our TLC Service includes formal postdischarge transition care management, which is delivered via timely face-to-face clinic or virtual telemedicine visit(s) with an anesthesiologist or internist shortly after initial hospital discharge. This separately reimbursable transition care management is indicated with a pre-existing, moderate-to-high complexity medical and/or psychosocial condition (such as patients with oxygen-dependent chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, high-dose chronic opioid use, or low socioeconomic resources) or the postoperative development of a new medical and/or psychosocial condition.

Our TLC Service plans, monitors, and maintains organizational accountability for all postoperative admissions to a skilled nursing facility, inpatient rehabilitation facility, or long-term acute care hospital, as well as strongly preferable initial home healthcare and rehabilitation. This discharge disposition is predicated on: (1) The patient’s preoperative Risk Assessment and Prediction Tool score [6] and (2) an assessment of the patient’s home setting, including the assured presence of a copilot caregiver (family member or close friend). This postdischarge care coordination and quality assurance effort is undertaken primarily by a social worker (transitions coach) who is embedded within our PASS-GO Program and TLC Service. However, our TLC Service physician leaders also regularly communicate directly with their physician counterparts, especially in establishing and reinforcing performance expectations as well as addressing a given facility’s recurrent escalations and other variances in postdischarge care.

We recognize that a new service like ours will have its share of limitations. Three potential major pitfalls of our TLC Service include: (1) Setting unrealistic goals and metrics—then initially over-promising and under-delivering to all our key stakeholders, (2) inadvertently confusing patients as to the important role played by the surgeon; and (3) unintentionally disenfranchising and alienating our community-based primary care physicians.

We are in the midst of a proof-of-concept, clinical pilot of our PASS-GO Program and TLC Service. Our initially targeted subset of lower extremity joint replacement surgeons, practicing at three distinct hospitals within our affiliated health system, have readily embraced this new approach to patient care. Of 163 scheduled total hip and knee arthroplasty patients, 100% have been successfully comanaged across the perioperative continuum from a standardized preoperative telephonic risk screening and selective medical optimization through individualized postdischarge disposition planning, implementation and monitoring. We plan to roll these programs out at two other hospitals and engage an increasing number of largely community-based orthopaedic surgeons.

We will rigorously evaluate whether this new approach, which incorporates not only individualized risk assessment and corresponding medical optimization, but also enhanced coordination across transitions of care, can successfully increase standardization of care for patients, leading to improved safety, higher quality care, greater patient and provider satisfaction, lower costs, and thus greater value of care delivered to our patients.