Abstract
The assessment of the completeness of earthquake catalogs is a prerequisite for studying the patterns of seismic activity. In traditional approaches, the minimum magnitude of completeness (MC) is employed to evaluate catalog completeness, with events below MC being discarded, leading to the underutilization of the data. Detection probability is a more detailed measure of the catalog’s completeness than MC; its use results in better model compatibility with data in seismic activity modeling and allows for more comprehensive utilization of seismic observation data across temporal, spatial, and magnitude dimensions. Using the magnitude–rank method I and Maximum Curvature (MAXC) methods, we analyzed temporal variations in earthquake catalog completeness, finding that MC stabilized after 2010, which closely coincides with improvements in monitoring capabilities and the densification of seismic networks. Employing the probability-based magnitude of completeness (PMC) and entire magnitude range (EMR) methods, grounded in distinct foundational assumptions and computational principles, we analyzed the 2010–2023 earthquake catalog for the northern margin of the Ordos Block, aiming to assess the detection I probability of earthquakes and the completeness of the earthquake catalog. The PMC method yielded the detection probability distribution for 76 stations in the distance–magnitude space. A scoring metric was designed based on station detection capabilities for small earthquakes in the near field. From the detection probabilities of stations, we inferred detection probabilities of the network for different magnitude ranges and mapped the spatial distribution of the probability-based completeness magnitude. In the EMR method, we employed a segmented model fitted to the observed data to determine the detection probability and completeness magnitude for every grid point in the study region. We discussed the sample dependency and low-magnitude failure phenomena of the PMC method, noting the potential overestimation of detection probabilities for lower magnitudes and the underestimation of MC in areas with weaker monitoring capabilities. The results obtained via the two methods support these hypotheses. The assessment results indicate better monitoring capabilities on the eastern side of the study area but worse on the northwest side. The spatial distribution of network monitoring capabilities is uneven, correlating with the distribution of stations and showing significant differences in detection capabilities among different stations. The truncation effects of data and station selection affected the evaluation results at the edges of the study area. Overall, both methods yielded detailed descriptions of the earthquake catalog, but careful selection of calculation parameters or adjustments based on the strengths of different methods is necessary to correct potential biases.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Amorese, D., 2007, Applying a change-point detection method on frequency-magnitude distributions: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 97(5), 1742–1749.
Bi, J. M., Song, C., Cao, F. Y., 2023, Activity characteristics of significant earthquake swarms in the Bohai Rim region: Applied Geophysics, 20(1), 100–115.
Cao, A., Gao, S.S., 2002, Temporal variation of seismic b-values beneath northeastern Japan island arc: Geophysical Research Letters, 29(9), 48-41–48-43.
Conover, W. J., 1999, Practical nonparametric statistics: John Wiley & Sons.
D’Alessandro, A., Luzio, D., D’Anna, G., et al., 2011, Seismic Network Evaluation through Simulation: An Application to the Italian National Seismic Network: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 101(3): 1213–1232.
Gao, L. X., Hou, D., Li, J., et al., 2016, Movement characteristics and present seismic activity of Ordos Block: Geodesy and Geodynamics, 7(6): 451–458.
Goertz-Allmann, B. P., Wiemer, S., 2013, Geomechanical modeling of induced seismicity source parameters and implications for seismic hazard assessment: Geophysics, 78(1), KS25–KS39.
Gomberg, J., Seismicity and detection/location threshold in the southern Great Basin seismic network: Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 1991, 96(B10): 16401–16414.
Gong, W. C., Chen, H. Y., Gao, Y. J., et al., 2024, A test on methods for MC estimation and spatial-temporal distribution of b-value in the eastern Tibetan Plateau: Frontiers in Earth Science, 12, 1335938.
Gutenberg, B., Richter, C. F., 1944, Frequency of earthquakes in California: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 34(4), 185–188.
Hainzl, S., 2016, Rate-dependent incompleteness of earthquake catalogs: Seismological Research Letters, 87(2A): 337–344.
Hainzl, S., 2022, ETAS-approach accounting for short-term incompleteness of earthquake catalogs: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 112(1), 494–507.
Huang, Y. L., Zhou, S. Y., Zhuang, J. C., 2016. Numerical tests on catalog-based methods to estimate magnitude of completeness: Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese), 59(4), 1350–1358.
Jiang, C. S., Fang, L. H., Han, L. B., et al., 2015. Assessment of earthquake detection capability for the seismic array: A case study of the Xichang seismic array: Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese), 58(3), 832–843.
Jiang, C. S., Wu, Z. L., 2011. Intermediate-term medium-range Accelerating Moment Release (AMR) priori to the 2010 Yushu MS7.1 earthquake: Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese), 54(6), 1501–1510.
Kagan, Y. Y., 2004, Short-term properties of earthquake catalogs and models of earthquake source, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 94(4), 1207–1228.
Kvœrna, T., Ringdal, F., 1999, Seismic threshold monitoring for continuous assessment of global detection capability: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 89(4): 946–959.
Leptokaropoulos, K. M., Adamaki, A. K., Roberts, R. G., et al., 2018, Impact of magnitude uncertainties on seismic catalogue properties: Geophysical Journal International, 213(2), 940–951.
Li, Z. C., Huang, Q. H., 2014. Assessment of detectability of the Capital-circle Seismic Network by using the probability-based magnitude of completeness (PMC) method: Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese), 57(8), 2584–2593.
Liu, F., Jiang, C. S., Zhang, F., et al., 2013. Monitoring capacity of seismic network in Inner Mongolia region based on EMR method: Earth Science(in Chinese), 38(6), 1356–1362.
Liu, F., Jiang, C. S., Zhang, F., et al., 2014. A study on detection capability of the Inner Mongolia regional seismic network: Acta Seismologica Sinica (in Chinese), 36(5), 919–929.
Liu, R. F., Gao, J. C., Chen, Y. T., et al., 2008, Construction and development of digital seismograph networks in China: Earthquake Science 21(5), 535–541.
Lombardi, A. M., 2021, A normalized distance test for co-determining the completeness magnitude and b-value of earthquake catalogs: Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 126(3), e2020JB021242.
Martinsson, J., Jonsson, A., 2018, A new model for the distribution of observable earthquake magnitudes and applications to b-value estimation: IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 15(6), 833–837.
Mignan, A., Jiang, C. S., Zechar, J. D., et al., 2013, Completeness of the Mainland China Earthquake Catalog and Implications for the Setup of the China Earthquake Forecast Testing Center: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 103(2A): 845–859.
Mignan, A., Werner, M. J., Wiemer, S., et al., 2011, Bayesian Estimation of the Spatially Varying Completeness Magnitude of Earthquake Catalogs: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 101(3), 1371–1385.
Mignan, A., Woessner, J., 2012, Theme IV—understanding seismicity catalogs and their problems: Community online resource for statistical seismicity analysis.
Mizrahi, L., Nandan, S., Wiemer, S., 2021, Embracing data incompleteness for better earthquake forecasting: Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 126(12), e2021JB022379.
Nanjo, K. Z., Schorlemmer, D., Woessner, J., et al., 2010, Earthquake detection capability of the Swiss Seismic Network: Geophysical Journal International, 181(3), 1713–1724.
Omi, T., Ogata, Y., Hirata, Y., et al., 2014, Estimating the ETAS model from an early aftershock sequence: Geophysical Research Letters, 41(3), 850–857.
Pavlenko, V. A., Zavyalov, A.D., 2022, Comparative analysis of the methods for estimating the magnitude of completeness of earthquake catalogs, Izvestiya: Physics of the Solid Earth, 58(1), 89–105.
Ram, K. T., Harihar, P., Daya, S., 2022, Spatio-temporal distribution of earthquake occurrence in Eastern Himalaya and vicinity (26° N–31° N and 87° E–98° E) based on b-value and fractal dimension: Applied Geophysics, 19(3), 458–469.
Rydelek, P. A., Sacks, I. S., 1989, Testing the completeness of earthquake catalogues and the hypothesis of self-similarity: Nature, 337(6204), 251–253.
Schorlemmer, D., Hirata, N., Ishigaki, Y., et al., 2018, Earthquake detection probabilities in Japan: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 108(2), 702–717.
Schorlemmer, D., Woessner, J., 2008, Probability of Detecting an Earthquake: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 98(5), 2103–2117.
Wang, Y. W., Jiang, C. S., Liu, F., et al., 2017. Assessment of earthquake monitoring capability and score of seismic station detection capability in China Seismic Network (2008–2015): Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese), 60(7), 2767–2778.
Wiemer, S., Wyss, M., 2000, Minimum magnitude of completeness in earthquake catalogs: Examples from Alaska, the western United States, and Japan: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 90(4), 859–869.
Woessner, J., Wiemer, S., 2005, Assessing the Quality of Earthquake Catalogues: Estimating the Magnitude of Completeness and Its Uncertainty: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 95(2), 684–698.
Xu, X. W., Wu, X. Y., Yu, G. H., et al., 2017. Seismogeological signatures for identifying M≥7.0 earthquake risk areas and their preliminary application in mainland China: Seismology and Geology (in Chinese), 39(2), 219–275.
Zhou, Y. J., Zhou, S. Y., Zhuang, J. C., 2018, A test on methods for MC estimation based on earthquake catalog: Earth and Planetary Physics, 2(2), 150–162.
Zhuang, J. C., 2011, Next-day earthquake forecasts for the Japan region generated by the ETAS model: Earth, Planets and Space, 63(3), 207–216.
Zúñiga, F. R., Wyss, M., 1995, Inadvertent changes in magnitude reported in earthquake catalogs: Their evaluation through b-value estimates: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 85(6): 1858–1866.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Director Fund of the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region Seismological Bureau (No. 2023GG02, 2023MS05) and the Inner Mongolia Natural Science Foundation General Project (No. 2024MS04021). The study utilized the National Unified Official Catalogue provided by the China Earthquake Networks Center.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research project is funded by Director Fund of the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region Seismological Bureau (No. 2023GG02, 2023MS05) and the Inner Mongolia Natural Science Foundation (No. 2024MS04021)
Zhang Fan received his Master’s degree in Statistics from Inner Mongolia University of Finance and Economics in 2014. He is currently employed at the Inner Mongolia Seismic Station of the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region Seismological Bureau. Since September 2019, he has been pursuing a Ph.D. at the School of Control and Computer Engineering at North China Electric Power University. His main research interests include earthquake prediction and machine learning.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, F., Yang, XZ. & Cui, FZ. Earthquake detection probabilities and completeness magnitude in the northern margin of the Ordos Block. Appl. Geophys. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11770-024-1128-1
Received:
Revised:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11770-024-1128-1