Abstract
Aim
To explore associations between phenotypic traits and polymorphisms in the DRB1 and GALNT6 gene in Nellore, Deccani and Kenguri sheep naturally infected with Haemonchus contortus.
Materials and Methods
Blood and faecal samples were collected to evaluate fecal worm egg counts (FEC), packed cell volume (PCV), hemoglobin (Hb), eosinophilia and for DNA isolation.
Results
Animals were grouped into susceptible and resistant groups based on EPG counts. FEC and circulating eosinophilia were higher in a susceptible group. Log FEC was negatively correlated (P < 0.01) with PCV, and Hb estimates. The second exon of DRB1 and intron variant of GALNTL6 genes were amplified from DNA samples of resistant and susceptible sheep. Characterization of Ovar-DRB1 amplicon by RFLP revealed two genotypes (‘bb’ and ‘ab’). The genotype frequencies differed significantly between both groups (P < 0.05). The ‘bb’ genotypes had higher (P < 0.05) log FEC value than ‘ab’ genotypes and ‘b’ allele was linked with susceptibility to haemonchosis in sheep. The mean FEC of Nellore sheep was high indicating susceptibility of the breed and also in which the frequency of ‘b’ allele was more compared to the other two breeds. OVAR-DRB1 genotypes associated with FEC did not affect PCV and Hb. PCR–RFLP assay developed to determine the genotypes with respect to SNP rs424521894 of GALNTL6 revealed monomorphic nature at the locus in the breeds studied.
Conclusion
MHC polymorphism could be used as a genetic marker for the selection of sheep resistant to H. contortus. However, a more intensive study, involving controlled infections and other GALNTL6 SNPs may be enforced to make any decisive assertion.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Haemonchus contortus, one of the pathogenic gastrointestinal nematodes (GIN) is an important health restraint in sheep production in India causing significant economic losses. Chemotherapy is the first line of defense against H. contortus infections due to the lack of commercial vaccines. Yet, widespread use and abuse of anthelmintics led to the development of anthelmintic-resistant parasites throughout the world [17] and forced a search for alternatives to chemotherapy. Selecting sheep, which are genetically resistant to H. contortus, is one of the viable alternative strategies because it is long lasting [38].
Host resistance to GIN is a moderately heritable trait [11] and is measurable through the performance of individuals after parasite challenges by phenotypic traits such as packed cell volume (PCV), serum antibodies, peripheral eosinophilia, FAMACHA visual indicator scores of anaemia and fecal egg counts (FEC). Use of both FEC and PCV values as indicators of GIN infections is limited because of the inability to store samples for a long time and laborious procedure of examination. However, FEC is far less invasive to measure and is the preferred method in most studies. Recognizing genetic markers related to disease resistance would probably improve the selection.
It is hypothesized that inherited GIN resistance is polygenic and related to immune system resistance [1]. Variation within these genes is related to resistance or susceptibility to H. contortus infection in sheep. Polymorphisms related to the DRB locus of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) and interferon gamma (IFNγ) genes have been the most frequently reported markers associated with H. contortus infection. The MHC genes are highly polymorphic [18] and play an important role in presenting processed antigen to host T-lymphocytes, causing T cell activation and consequent immunological cascade of events building host immunity. The polymorphism of MHC-DRB1 gene in sheep has been studied as a genetic marker for resistance to H. contortus [32]. Goats susceptible to H. contortus infection showed up regulation of IFNγ [30].
Recent genome-wide studies stated that not only immune mechanisms are important determinants of host resistance but also the genes involved in the gastrointestinal mucus production (MUC or GALNT), and hemostasis (TAL1 or PPAP2B or LRP8) regulation may also simulate [5]. Mucin biosynthesis plays an important role in gastric mucosal protection, acting as a barrier and triggering swift parasite expulsion. Exploration of genetic variation either within specific regions of the genome or more specifically in candidate genes involved in these pathways may help to identify a set of DNA markers significantly associated with parasite resistance characteristics. The effects of these established gene markers on phenotypic traits such as FEC and PCV are measured to select resistant individuals. The study is aimed to assess the resistance status of sheep against H. contortus using phenotypic traits such as FEC, peripheral eosinophilia and PCV in relation to variation in the genomic region of immune pathway and mucus production.
Materials and Methods
Sample Collection
Sheep (excluding the advance pregnant ewes and lambs up to 4 months age) grazed freely in native pastural land were included in the study to maximize and confirm the likelihood of natural parasite infection. Nellore sheep (n = 95) maintained at the sheep farm of Livestock Farm Complex, NTR College of Veterinary Science, Gannavaram, Andhra Pradesh, Deccani (n = 28) and Kenguri sheep (n = 34) maintained at sheep farm in Bidar district, Karnataka were included in the study. Faecal samples were collected directly from the rectum of 157 sheep in plastic zip-lock bags and were brought to the laboratory for further processing. From each animal, blood was also collected into a sterile vaccutainer containing K3 EDTA under aseptic conditions for haematological parameters estimation and genomic DNA extraction on the same day. The samples were labeled and transported to the laboratory in an ice-packed container immediately.
Phenotyping of Animals
FEC, PCV, hemoglobin (Hb) and eosinophil count were performed for the phenotyping of animals. FEC measurements for strongyle eggs were determined by floating the faeces samples in zinc sulphate (d = 1.33) solution on McMaster slide and counting the eggs. The results were interpreted as eggs per gram (epg) of faeces. Two chambers of McMaster slide were counted for each sample and their mean was considered for analysis. The presence of H. contortus was determined by culturing the pooled faecal samples and subsequent third-stage larvae identification.
PCV and Hb were determined using the standard Wintrobe’s tube method and Sahil’s hemoglobinometer respectively, on the same day of collection. Blood smears were stained with Leishman’s stain and differential leukocyte counts (DLC) were carried out by battlement method. An absolute eosinophil count was estimated from the DLC and TLC values. The counts were expressed as a number of cells per microliter of blood.
Genotyping of Animals
DNA was isolated from each blood sample (500 μL) using a modified high salt method [22]. The exon 2 of Ovar-DRB1 gene was amplified using the primers and cycling conditions of Sankhyan et al. [27]. A total of 15 μL reaction mixture containing 30 ng DNA template, 5 pm of each primer, and 7.5 μL of master mix (Green dye PCR master mix (2x), Takara) was set up for amplification.
The polypeptide N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase like-6 (GALNTL6) gene of sheep was amplified using the forward (5′ -AGACATACCTGGGACCACTTC-3′) and reverse (5′ -CCCACTCTTAGCAACCCCATAG-3) primers that were designed using Primer Quest tool of Integrated DNA Technologies against an intronic variant of GALNTL6 gene capturing the SNP rs424521894 identified as having significant association with parasite resistance in sheep from the genome-wide association studies (GWAS) [2]. The amplification reaction comprised of an initial denaturation of 5 min at 94 °C, followed by 35 cycles of 94 °C for 45 s, 60 °C for 40 s and 72 °C for 60 s with a final extension of 7 min at 72 °C. A negative control was run along with the samples at every PCR setup. PCR amplicons were analysed on 2% (w/v) agarose gel containing ethidium bromide (0.5 µg/mL) and visualized under a UV transilluminator (Omega Fluor™ Plus Documentation Systems, BioExpress, USA).
RFLP was employed to detect the polymorphic patterns and thus genotype the sheep at the Ovar-DRB1and GALNTL6 (polypeptide N-acetyl galactosaminyl transferase-like 6) genes. The PCR amplicons of Ovar-DRB1genewere digested using REase PstI (5 U) (Himedia, Mumbai) with the appropriate buffer at 37 °C for 16 h. whereas the PCR amplicons of GALNTL6 gene were digested using REaseAluI (10 U) (Himedia, Mumbai) with the appropriate buffer at the same conditions. The digested products were analyzed on 2% agarose gel to observe the polymorphic patterns and thus the genotypes of the Ovar-DRB1 and GALNTL6 genes. To monitor PstI enzyme activity the PCR product of 285 bp without restriction enzyme was used as positive control. To monitor AluI enzyme activity the PCR product of 543 bp without restriction enzyme was used as internal control. A 485 bp PCR product of TLR1 (F: 5′-TTTAGCAGCCTTTCCATACT-3′, R: 5′-CAGAATCGTGCCCACTATATGA-3′) selected from department laboratory archives having a known cleavage site for AluI is used as positive control. Negative control was a mix inoculated with ultrapure water in substitution of PCR product and enzyme was used.
Statistical Analysis
The descriptive statistics were derived on FEC, PCV, and Hb. Normalcy of the data was assessed with the Shapiro-Wilks test, kurtosis and skewness analyses conducted in SPSS17. The FEC data of this study was observed to be not normally distributed and showed positive skewness. As a result, a logarithmic transformation [LFEC = log10(FEC + 200)] was applied to normalize the FEC before analysis. No transformation was necessary for PCV, or Hb.
Genotypic and allelic frequencies were assessed for each candidate gene in each population [13]. Population genetic parameters including gene heterozygosity (He), polymorphism information content (PIC), and effective allele numbers (Ne) were calculated [3, 24]. A generalized linear model (GLM) was tested using the SPSS17 software to determine associations between SNP and phenotypic indicator, as measured by FEC/PCV/Hb. The statistical model was: y = µ + B + G + e, where y is the trait measured upon, μ is the overall population mean, B is fixed effects of breed and G is genotype, which was tested for an association with LFEC/PCV/Hb, and e is a residual error. Statistical analyses were performed, at a 5% significance level. All the graphs were plotted using the online version of chart maker [31].
Results
Phenotypic Data for Haemonchosis Status
The phenotypic indicator traits were assessed in 157 sheep (Supplementary material I). The faecal cultures revealed the presence of exclusively H. contortus infective larvae in the studied sheep. Hence, for EPG estimation only the strongyle eggs were counted. Sheep were grouped into high FEC (> 500 EPG; n = 119) and low FEC (0–500; n = 38) groups based on EPG counts corresponding to susceptible and resistant groups, respectively. The mean value of FEC in resistant sheep was lower (48.7 ± 14.3 epg) than in susceptible sheep (2675.2 ± 280.6 epg). The mean of log-transformed FEC (LFEC) was 3.3 ± 0.1 and 2.4 ± 0.1 in susceptible and resistant sheep, respectively. Among breeds, Nellore sheep had the highest log FEC than Deccani and Kenguri sheep. The mean value of eosinophilia was high in susceptible sheep with a significantly higher level of FEC.
The mean value of PCV and Hb in resistant sheep was high compared to that of susceptible sheep. The distribution of FEC, PCV and Hb among resistant and susceptible populations is depicted in Supplementary material II: Fig. 1–3. Log FEC was negatively correlated (P < 0.01) with PCV (0.71), and Hb (0.73) estimates. However, the correlation between PCV and Hb was positive (P < 0.01) in all sheep (0.95).
Genotyping of Ovar-DRB1 and GALNTL6 Genes
The amplification of Ovar-DRB1 gene and GALNTL6 gene by PCR yielded the expected fragment of 285 bp and 543 bp, respectively. Oligonucleotide primers did not yield PCR products with the negative control. Following digestion of Ovar-DRB1amplicons with REase PstI, two patterns were observed, one with 226 bp, 44 bp and 15 bp, and the second with 270 bp, 226 bp, 44 bp and 15 bp fragment which were referred to ‘bb’ (homozygous) and ‘ab’ (heterozygous) genotypes, respectively (Fig. 1). ‘aa’ (homozygous) pattern was not observed. The Renase PstI recognizes the nucleotide sequence CTGCA↓G.
Considering the whole population together, the ‘bb’ genotype frequency was found to be non-significantly (P > 0.05) more (0.78) compared to that of ‘ab’ genotypes and the frequency of ‘b’ allele (0.89) was more than ‘a’ allele (0.11). Minor allele frequency (MAF) across the breeds was ranging between 0.09 and 0.16. The expected and observed genotypic frequencies for DRB1exon2/PstI locus in the sheep groups were almost similar and were consistent with Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (P > 0.05) (Table 1). The observed heterozygosity value was in accordance with the expected heterozygosity (Supplementary material I). The PIC values are indicative of low polymorphism (0.15–0.23) in all the populations studied. Fixation index is −0.10 to −0.19.
With the significant influence of rs424521894 (GALNTL6) on resistance to GIN, the restriction enzyme (AluI) was identified to determine the SNP, thus enabling to screen sheep population by RFLP. Digestion of PCR fragment of GALNTL6 with REase AluI, undigested single fragment (543 bp) referred to “aa’ genotype (Fig. 2) was observed.
Association of Ovar-DRB1 Genotypes and Breeds with Infection Traits
Least squares means and standard deviations for FEC, PCV and Hb levels involving breed and DRB1 polymorphs as independent factors are shown in Table 2. The overall mean log FEC in the sampled sheep was 2089 ± 0.04. The pattern of distribution of FEC among the DRB genotypes of sheep is portrayed in Fig. 3. The ‘bb’ genotypes had significantly (P < 0.05) higher log FEC value than ‘ab’ genotypes. The mean FEC of Nellore sheep was high (P < 0.01) compared to Deccani and Kenguri breeds. No differences were observed in FEC between Deccani and Kenguri sheep (P > 0.05). The PCV and Hb was highest in the Deccani breed and statistically significant differences in mean PCV (P < 0.01) and Hb (P < 0.05) were observed among breeds. Eosinophil count is more in a susceptible group (0–7) than in the resistant group (0–2). The pattern of distribution of eosinophil, FEC, PCV and Hb among the DRB genotypes of sheep is portrayed in Supplementary material II: Fig. 4–6.
Considering the significant association of genotypes with log FEC the distribution pattern of genotypes between susceptible (high FEC group) and resistant (low FEC group) sheep were verified. The ‘ab’ and ‘bb’ genotype frequency in the resistant group was 0.32 (n = 12) and 0.68 (n = 26) and the corresponding values in the susceptible group were 0.19 (n = 23) and 0.81 (n = 96). The ‘a’ and ‘b’ allele frequencies in the resistant group were 0.16 and 0.84, respectively, and 0.1 and 0.9 respectively, in the susceptible group. Both the groups were in accordance with Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium. The genotype and allele frequencies between resistant and susceptible group was subjected to chi-square analysis. The genotype frequencies differed significantly (χ2 = 4.45; df = 2) between both groups (P < 0.05). As GLM analysis (Table 2) revealed a difference (P < 0.01) in mean log FEC among breeds, the data was subjected to analysis to test for the significant difference in genotype and allele frequencies between the breeds (Table 3). The genotype frequencies of Nellore sheep differed significantly (P < 0.05) with Deccani.
Characterization of GALNTL6 with PCR–RFLP revealed an undigested single fragment (543 bp) referred to “aa’ genotypes. Since monomorphic no further association studies could be conducted for the investigated SNP.
Discussion
Selection of resistant sheep mostly relies on indirect criteria including a number of nematode eggs passed in the sheep faeces (FEC), PCV and less commonly eosinophilia. It can be evaluated by both challenge and natural infections, but natural infection is better and more feasible while the heritability of infection based on FEC and PCV was greater with natural infection. For example, Red Maasai showed a better response to natural infection compared with experimental infection with H. contortus. Among phenotypic indicators, FEC has been the phenotype of choice to evaluate resistance in sheep experiencing similar parasite challenge as it is correlated to worm burden [20]. Variation in FEC of studied sheep could be because of a number of factors such as hypobiosis of larvae, suppression of egg production or marked differences in the proportion of female and male worms.
Haemonchus contortus is a blood-feeding parasite causing anaemia an important clinical sign; thence PCV percentage is another useful marker [34] and is negatively correlated with FEC. In the studied sheep, FEC was negatively correlated (P < 0.01) with PCV, and Hb estimates [9, 19]. Low values for PCV are therefore commonly associated with high FEC due to the sucking of large amounts of blood from the abomasum by worms. PCV has also been reported to be higher in resistant breeds infected with H. contortus than in susceptible breeds [23].
Eosinophilia has been reported to be another indicator of parasite infection and naturally resistant breeds; Red Maasai and Scottish Blackface had high circulating eosinophil counts indicating a negative correlation with FEC [33]. Contrary, the association between resistance to H. contortus and eosinophilia in sheep did not indicate an inverse relationship [15]. No significant correlation between FEC and eosinophil counts in resistant Romney lambs [26] was found. Current results showed that eosinophilia is more pronounced in susceptible sheep with a significantly higher level of FEC. The eosinophilia appeared to be related to the level of infection instead of the resistance status. Confirming the present findings, FEC and circulating eosinophilia were higher (P < 0.05) in susceptible Creole kids [4] however, from a phenotypic view, the relationship was insignificant. The differences shown between eosinophilia and FEC may be associated with the species of parasite involved, though genetic variation in the ability to mount eosinophil response after parasite infection is evidenced in mice [36]. Anyhow, the contradictory results demonstrate that peripheral eosinophilia is not a reliable indicator of parasite burden in sheep.
Identification of genes responsible for parasite resistance could enhance the precision of genomic prediction that in turn resulting genetic improvement for the FEC trait. Characterization of Ovar-DRB1 with REase PstI two genotypes and two distinct DRB1 alleles were observed, indicating polymorphism at the loci [35]. However, three genotypes for the same region were observed in a population of Raeini Cashmere goats [3] and small ruminant breeds of North India [27]. The difference in fragment pattern and number of alleles could be due to the variation in the length of nucleotide sequences and the restriction enzymes used. The frequency of ‘bb’ genotypes and ‘b’ allele was high in the entire sheep population under study. Contrary to the present observations, ‘ab’ (70.5%) genotype (restriction site was alike, but genotype was referred as ‘A1A2’) and ‘a’ allele was frequent in Iranian sheep [35].
The studied sheep exhibited low variation (PIC = 0.15–0.23) at the Ovar-DRB1 locus similar to the populations of Suffolk and Texel sheep [29]. Fixation index in the studied groups is indicative of heterozygote excess suggesting avoidance of inbreeding that might have occurred in the population. Heterozygotes recognize parasitic antigens more probably than homozygotes, hence susceptibility to worms may be influenced not simply by the effects of a particular gene as well as by individual MHC heterozygosity [25]. Wild-derived mice, which were MHC heterozygotes did not display better resistance to Salmonella or better survival in semi-natural enclosures [16]. Reduced heterozygosity may be a signature of selection in sheep for resistance to haemonchosis and trypanosomosis [37]. This obvious inconsistency could be partly explained by heterozygous animals being more likely to possess either ‘‘resistance’’ or ‘‘susceptibility’’ alleles. These results emphasize the importance of studies on wild, outbred species.
The ‘bb’ genotypes had significantly higher log FEC value, hence ‘b’ allele is linked with susceptibility to haemonchosis in sheep which was further supported by the observation of increased frequency of ‘bb’ genotypes in the high FEC group. Moreover, difference (P < 0.05) in genotype frequency between high and low FEC groups clearly stated the association of ‘b’ allele with high FEC. Homozygosity at the Ovar-DRB1 locus impair the ability to respond effectively to disease [28]. The Ovar-DRB1 locus was associated with low FEC in sheep infected with H. contortus [12]. However, the absence of an association between Ovar-DRB1 alleles and FEC was observed in Texel sheep [29], due to the absence of linkage disequilibrium.
The mean FEC of Nellore sheep was high (Table 2) specifying the susceptibility of the breed and also in which the frequency of ‘b’ allele was more compared to Deccani and Kenguri breeds. The difference in FEC between these breeds may be attributed to the different allele profile at the DRB1 locus. The present results validated the evidence of an observation of the association of ‘b’ allele with increased FEC in Iranian sheep [35]. Though higher mean PCV and Hb was observed in ‘ab’ genotype sheep, the difference was not significant (P > 0.05). GWAS in a Red Maasai X Dropper back cross population revealed that genotypes associated with FEC did not affect PVC [6]. Similarly, the effect of genotypes on log FEC was found statistically significant at DRB1 exon 2, without association with PCV [30]. Consequently, selection for resistance to H. contortus infection has been based predominately on FEC [8], with the main objective of reducing FEC.
Gastrointestinal mucus and its constituents, mucins are found to be crucial in protecting the gut against enteric pathogens. Previous studies noticed that host-derived mucus was found to be present in the intestine of the nematode parasites themselves [21] and parasite feeding and motility were restricted when larvae were co-cultured with sheep intestinal mucus [10]. On this account, mucin is regarded to be the first line of host defense against invading pathogens and is an essential anti-parasite effector molecules [14].
The GALNTL6 gene is a member of a highly conserved family of proteins and is accountable for the synthesis of mucin-type O-glycans. PCR–RFLP assay was developed to genotype the sheep with respect to SNP rs424521894 of GALNTL6 that revealed monomorphic nature in the breeds studied. Several genes from this family, such as GALNT1, GALNT4 and GALNT8, have also been reported as being of importance for sheep resistance to GIN infections [5]. GALNTL6 harbours the most significant SNP (rs424521894) detected by GWAS analysis [2] and contains haplotype block6 (107.33–107.38 Mbp), the only haplotype block having a significant effect on parasite resistance.
MHC polymorphism has a crucial role in parasite resistance or susceptibility in sheep and could be used as genetic markers to assist selection and improve parasite resistance to H. contortus. Screening of H. contortus FEC under natural infection is informative because it agrees with typical conditions in the production environment. Ovar-DRB1 genotypes associated with FEC did not cause significant differences in PCV nor Hb in the studied sheep. However, more intensive studies, involving controlled infections coupled with clinical parasitology and other GALNTL6 SNPs may be required to make any conclusive statement as host resistance to internal nematode parasites is likely to be controlled by a number of loci of moderate to small effects.
References
Aguerre S, Jacquiet P, Brodier H, Bournazel JP, Grisez C, Prévot F, Moreno CR (2018) Resistance to gastrointestinal nematodes in dairy sheep: genetic variability and relevance of artificial infection of nucleus rams to select for resistant ewes on farms. Vet Parasitol 256:16–23
Al Kalaldeh M, Gibson J, Lee SH, Gondro C, Van Der Werf JH (2019) Detection of genomic regions underlying resistance to gastrointestinal parasites in Australian sheep. Genet Sel Evol 51:1–18
Baghizadeh A, Bahaaddini M, Mohamadabadi MR, Askari N (2009) Allelic variations in exon 2 of Caprine MHC class II DRB3 gene in Raeini Cashmere goat. Am-Eurasian J Agric Environ Sci 6:454–459
Bambou JC, González-García E, De la Chevrotière C, Arquet R, Vachiéry N, Mandonnet N (2009) Peripheral immune response in resistant and susceptible Creole kids experimentally infected with Haemonchuscontortus. Small Rumin Res 82:34–39
Benavides MV, Sonstegard TS, Van Tassell C (2016) Genomic regions associated with sheep resistance to gastrointestinal nematodes. Trends Parasitol 32:470–480
Benavides MV, Sonstegard TS, Kemp S, Mugambi JM, Gibson JP, Baker RL, Van Tassell C (2015) Identification of novel loci associated with gastrointestinal parasite resistance in a Red Maasai x Dorper backcross population. PLoS ONE 10:e0122797
Botstein D, White RL, Skolnick M, Davis RW (1980) Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Am J Hum Genet 32:314
Carracelas B, Navajas EA, Vera B, Ciappesoni G (2022) Genome-wide association study of parasite resistance to gastrointestinal nematodes in Corriedale sheep. Genes 13:1548
Chauhan KK, Rout PK, Singh PK, Mandal A, Singh HN, Roy R, Singh SK (2003) Susceptibility to natural gastro-intestinal nematode infection in different physiological stages in Jamunapari and Barbari goats in the semi-arid tropics. Small Rumin Res 50:219–223
Douch PG, Harrison GB, Buchanan LL, Greer KS (1983) In vitro bioassay of sheep gastrointestinal mucus for nematode paralysing activity mediated by substances with some properties characteristic of SRS-A. Int J Parasitol 13:207–212
Eady SJ, Woolaston RR, Mortimer SI, Lewer RP, Raadsma HW, Swan AA, Ponzoni PRW (1996) Resistance to nematode parasites in Merino sheep: sources of genetic variation. Aust J Agric Res 47:895–915
Estrada-Reyes ZM, Tsukahara Y, Goetsch AL, Gipson TA, Sahlu T, Puchala R, Mateescu RG (2018) Effect of Ovar-DRA and Ovar-DRB 1 genotype in small ruminants with haemonchosis. Parasite Immunol 40:e12534
Falconer DS (1996) Introduction to quantitative genetics. Pearson Education India, Noida
Hasnain SZ, Gallagher AL, Grencis RK, Thornton DJ (2013) A new role for mucins in immunity: insights from gastrointestinal nematode infection. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 45:364–374
Hohenhaus MA, Outteridge PM (1995) The immunogenetics of resistance toTrichostrongylus colubriformis and Haemonchus contortus parasites in sheep. Br Vet J 151:119–140
Ilmonen P, Penn DJ, Damjanovich K, Morrison L, Ghotbi L, Potts WK (2007) Major histocompatibility complex heterozygosity reduces fitness in experimentally infected mice. Genetics 176:2501–2508
Kaplan RM, Vidyashankar AN (2012) An inconvenient truth: global warming and anthelmintic resistance. Vet Parasitol 186:70–78
Konnai S, Nagaoka Y, Takesima S, Onuma M, Aida Y (2003) DNA typing for ovine MHC DRB1 using polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP). J Dairy Sci 86(10):3362–3365
MacKinnon KM, Zajac AM, Kooyman FN, Notter DR (2010) Differences in immune parameters are associated with resistance to Haemonchuscontortus in Caribbean hair sheep. Parasite Immunol 32:484–493
Marshall K, Maddox JF, Lee SH, Zhang Y, Kahn L, Graser HU, Gondro C, Walkden-Brown SW, van der Werf JH (2009) Genetic mapping of quantitative trait loci for resistance to Haemonchuscontortus in sheep. Anim Genet 40:262–272
Miller HR, Huntley JF, Wallace GR (1981) Immune exclusion and mucus trapping during the rapid expulsion of Nippostrongylusbrasiliensis from primed rats. Immunol 44:419
Montgomery GW, Sise J (1990) Extraction of DNA from sheep white blood cells. New Zealand J Agric Res 33(3):437–441
Mugambi JM, Audho JO, Baker RL (2005) Evaluation of the phenotypic performance of a Red Maasai and Dorper double backcross resource population: natural pasture challenge with gastro-intestinal nematode parasites. Small Rumin Res 56:239–251
Nei M, Roychoudhury A (1974) Sampling variances of heterozygosity and genetic distance. Genetics 76:379–390
Oliver MK, Telfer S, Piertney SB (2009) Major histocompatibility complex (MHC) heterozygote superiority to natural multi-parasite infections in the water vole (Arvicola terrestris). Proc Biol Sci 276(1659):1119–1128
Pernthaner A, Stankiewicz M, Bisset SA, Jonas WE, Cabaj W, Pulford HD (1995) The immune responsiveness of Romney sheep selected for resistance or susceptibility to gastrointestinal nematodes: lymphocyte blastogenic activity, eosinophilia and total white blood cell counts. Int J Parasitol 25:523–529
Sankhyan V, Thakur YP, Dogra PK (2019) Genotyping of MHC class II DRB3 gene using PCR-RFLP and DNA sequencing in small ruminant breeds of Western Himalayan state of Himachal Pradesh, India. Indian J Anim Res 53:1551–1558
Sauermann U, Stahl-Hennig C, Stolte N, Mühl T, Krawczak M, Spring M, Fuchs D, Kaup FJ, Hunsmann G, Sopper S (2000) Homozygosity for a conserved MHC class II DQ-DRB haplotype is associated with rapid disease progression in simian immunodeficiency virus—infected macaques: results from a prospective study. J Infect Dis 182:716–724
Sayers G, Good B, Hanrahan JP, Ryan M, Angles JM, Sweeney T (2005) Major histocompatibility complex DRB1 gene: its role in nematode resistance in suffolk and texel sheep breeds. Parasitol 131:403–409
Shrivastava K, Kumar P, Khan MF, Sahoo NR, Prakash O, Kumar A, Panigrahi M, Chauhan A, Bhushan B, Prasad A, Nasir A, Patel BHM (2018) Exploring the molecular basis of resistance/susceptibility to mixed natural infection of Haemonchus contortus in tropical Indian goat breed. Vet Parasitol 262:6–10
Statistics Kingdom (2017) Available from: http://www.statskingdom.com/170median_mann_whitney.html.
Stear A, Ali AOA, Brujeni GN, Buitkamp J, Donskow-Łysoniewska K, Fairlie-Clarke K, Groth D, Isa NMM, Stear MJ (2019) Identification of the amino acids in the major histocompatibility complex class II region of Scottish Blackface sheep that are associated with resistance to nematode infection. Int J Parasitol 49:797–804
Stear MJ, Murray M (1994) Genetic resistance to parasitic disease: particularly of resistance in ruminants to gastrointestinal nematodes. Vet Parasitol 54:161–176
Taylor MA, Hunt KR, Wilson CA, Quick JM (1990) Clinical observations, diagnosis and control of Haemonchus contortus infections in periparturient ewes. Vet Rec 126:555–556
Valilou RH, Rafat SA, Notter DR, Shojda D, Moghaddam G, Nematollahi A (2015) Fecal egg counts for gastrointestinal nematodes are associated with a polymorphism in the MHC-DRB1 gene in the Iranian Ghezel sheep breed. Front Genet 6:105
Wakelin D, Donachie AM (1983) Genetic control of eosinophilia mouse strain variation in response to antigens of parasite origin. Clin Exp Immunol 51:239
Yaro M, Munyard KA, Morgan E, Allcock RJN, Stear MJ, Groth DM (2019) Analysis of pooled genome sequences from Djallonke and Sahelian sheep of Ghana reveals co-localisation of regions of reduced heterozygosity with candidate genes for disease resistance and adaptation to a tropical environment. BMC Genom 20:1–14
Zvinorova PI, Halimani TE, Muchadeyi FC, Matika O, Riggio V, Dzama K (2016) Breeding for resistance to gastrointestinal nematodes–the potential in low-input/output small ruminant production systems. Vet Parasitol 225:19–28
Acknowledgements
The authors are thankful to the Dean, Sri Venkateswara Veterinary University, Tirupati for the facilities provided.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Dr. RP: Conceptualization, methodology, investigation, final analysis; Dr. SC: Conceptualization, original draft preparation; Dr. SK: Methodology, final analysis; Dr. JC: Supervision; Dr. RKP: Review and editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
The present study does not involve any animal testing or experimental studies with animals. Ethical review and approval were not warranted for this study, as the faecal material and blood samples collected for routine diagnostic screening were included in the study. The samples were collected aseptically from sheep by a qualified veterinarian after written informed consent from the organization / owners following the applicable guidelines for the care and use of animals.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Pratap, R., Chennuru, S., Krovvidi, S. et al. Putative SNPs in Ovar-DRB1 and GALNTL6 Genes Conferring Susceptibility to Natural Infection of Haemonchus Contortus in Southern Indian Sheep. Acta Parasit. 69, 583–590 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11686-023-00778-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11686-023-00778-8